Download png, svg
AI explanation
Firefighters had more time to curate stunning desktop backgrounds amidst the reduction in fiery incidents, leading to an overall decline in the need to seek out aesthetically pleasing wallpapers online.Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image where a surrealist landscape features a charming suburban home in Massachusetts as the focal point. Inside the cozy house, a computer screen displays a stunning desktop background, casting a warm glow in the living room. In the tranquil neighborhood outside, a small fire is visible, suggesting an unsettling act of arson as someone sets fire to a pile of fallen leaves. The juxtaposition of the peaceful interior and the ominous outdoor scene creates a sense of mystery and tension. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Arson in Massachusetts and Google searches for 'desktop background'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Brutalism Surrealism High-tech Voxel art Cyberpunk
ChatGPT: Surrealism
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Arson in Massachusetts and Google searches for 'desktop background' together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a quiet neighborhood in Massachusetts, a cozy home with a beautiful desktop background displays on the computer screen in the living room. Outside, a small fire burns as someone sets fire to a pile of leaves, indicating an act of arson.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Surrealism ] and depicting this scene: In a quiet neighborhood in Massachusetts, a cozy home with a beautiful desktop background displays on the computer screen in the living room. Outside, a small fire burns as someone sets fire to a pile of leaves, indicating an act of arson. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image where a surrealist landscape features a charming suburban home in Massachusetts as the focal point. Inside the cozy house, a computer screen displays a stunning desktop background, casting a warm glow in the living room. In the tranquil neighborhood outside, a small fire is visible, suggesting an unsettling act of arson as someone sets fire to a pile of fallen leaves. The juxtaposition of the peaceful interior and the ominous outdoor scene creates a sense of mystery and tension.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Arson in Massachusetts caused desktop background (Google searches for 'desktop background') to decrease.
AI academic paper
Ablaze in the Bay State: The Correlation Between Arson and Searches for 'Desktop Background' The Journal of Pyromaniacal Studies Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Massachusetts and Google searches for 'desktop background'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Rhyme words in the title.
Your research team used data from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9613012 and p < 0.01 for 2007 to 2022.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Ablaze in the Bay State: The Correlation Between Arson and Searches for 'Desktop Background'
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper examines the intriguing relationship between arson incidents in Massachusetts and the frequency of Google searches for 'desktop background' over a span of 15 years. Drawing from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends, our study delves into the enigmatic link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.
The findings, much like a well-timed dad joke, bring a surprising twist. Our analysis reveals a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9613012 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2007 to 2022. This correlation stands out like a flamingo in a flock of pigeons, prompting further investigation into the factors driving this unexpected connection.
The implications of this correlation are not to be brushed off like ashes. While the exact nature of the relationship remains shrouded in mystery, our study sheds light on a potentially unsuspected influence on arson patterns in the Bay State. As we move forward, it is important for policymakers and researchers to consider the seemingly whimsical yet influential factors at play, such as the allure of aesthetically pleasing desktop backgrounds in the digital age. After all, when it comes to uncovering unusual correlations, this research uncovers sparks of insight that are, quite literally, fire.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Massachusetts and Google searches for 'desktop background'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Ablaze in the Bay State: The Correlation Between Arson and Searches for 'Desktop Background'
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper examines the intriguing relationship between arson incidents in Massachusetts and the frequency of Google searches for 'desktop background' over a span of 15 years. Drawing from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends, our study delves into the enigmatic link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.
The findings, much like a well-timed dad joke, bring a surprising twist. Our analysis reveals a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9613012 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2007 to 2022. This correlation stands out like a flamingo in a flock of pigeons, prompting further investigation into the factors driving this unexpected connection.
The implications of this correlation are not to be brushed off like ashes. While the exact nature of the relationship remains shrouded in mystery, our study sheds light on a potentially unsuspected influence on arson patterns in the Bay State. As we move forward, it is important for policymakers and researchers to consider the seemingly whimsical yet influential factors at play, such as the allure of aesthetically pleasing desktop backgrounds in the digital age. After all, when it comes to uncovering unusual correlations, this research uncovers sparks of insight that are, quite literally, fire.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the saying goes, "Where there's smoke, there's fire." In the realm of research, our team has taken this adage quite literally as we delved into the smoldering world of arson incidents in the Bay State. However, though our investigation ignited curiosity, we ended up fanning the flames of discovery in unexpected directions. Our study has uncovered a correlation that can best be described as "hot" - we're not just talking about the heat from arson, but also the scorching relationship between arson incidents in Massachusetts and the frequency of Google searches for 'desktop background.'
It is often said that research can be a bit of a gamble, like betting on the likelihood of a cat igniting a candle with its curiosity. In this case, our bet paid off. Our analysis has unearthed a correlation coefficient so strong, it’s as if statistical significance and the association between arson in Massachusetts and searches for 'desktop background' were tied together like a pair of mismatched socks. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9613012 and a p-value that's nigh impossible to ignore, our findings have set the world of correlation studies ablaze.
What could possibly account for this seemingly bizarre association, you may wonder? Could it be that individuals, after searching for the perfect desktop background, find themselves so captivated by the beauty of nature or awe-inspiring scenery that they are less likely to engage in arson? Or perhaps there's a subliminal message in those vibrant desktop images, steering individuals away from arson and towards creating fires of creativity in their workspaces? The possibilities are as fascinating and mysterious as trying to solve a Rubik's cube blindfolded, but our findings beckon further exploration.
The implications of this correlation are as unexpected as discovering a well-done steak in a vegetarian restaurant. While the direct link between 'desktop background' searches and arson remains as elusive as a particularly sneaky cat, our study speaks to the importance of considering unforeseen influences on behavior. As researchers, it is essential to keep our eyes open for sparks of insight, no matter how unconventional they may seem. After all, in the world of science, uncovering unforeseen correlations could be the kindling that sets the fire of innovation ablaze.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Massachusetts and Google searches for 'desktop background'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Ablaze in the Bay State: The Correlation Between Arson and Searches for 'Desktop Background'
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper examines the intriguing relationship between arson incidents in Massachusetts and the frequency of Google searches for 'desktop background' over a span of 15 years. Drawing from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends, our study delves into the enigmatic link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.
The findings, much like a well-timed dad joke, bring a surprising twist. Our analysis reveals a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9613012 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2007 to 2022. This correlation stands out like a flamingo in a flock of pigeons, prompting further investigation into the factors driving this unexpected connection.
The implications of this correlation are not to be brushed off like ashes. While the exact nature of the relationship remains shrouded in mystery, our study sheds light on a potentially unsuspected influence on arson patterns in the Bay State. As we move forward, it is important for policymakers and researchers to consider the seemingly whimsical yet influential factors at play, such as the allure of aesthetically pleasing desktop backgrounds in the digital age. After all, when it comes to uncovering unusual correlations, this research uncovers sparks of insight that are, quite literally, fire.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the saying goes, "Where there's smoke, there's fire." In the realm of research, our team has taken this adage quite literally as we delved into the smoldering world of arson incidents in the Bay State. However, though our investigation ignited curiosity, we ended up fanning the flames of discovery in unexpected directions. Our study has uncovered a correlation that can best be described as "hot" - we're not just talking about the heat from arson, but also the scorching relationship between arson incidents in Massachusetts and the frequency of Google searches for 'desktop background.'
It is often said that research can be a bit of a gamble, like betting on the likelihood of a cat igniting a candle with its curiosity. In this case, our bet paid off. Our analysis has unearthed a correlation coefficient so strong, it’s as if statistical significance and the association between arson in Massachusetts and searches for 'desktop background' were tied together like a pair of mismatched socks. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9613012 and a p-value that's nigh impossible to ignore, our findings have set the world of correlation studies ablaze.
What could possibly account for this seemingly bizarre association, you may wonder? Could it be that individuals, after searching for the perfect desktop background, find themselves so captivated by the beauty of nature or awe-inspiring scenery that they are less likely to engage in arson? Or perhaps there's a subliminal message in those vibrant desktop images, steering individuals away from arson and towards creating fires of creativity in their workspaces? The possibilities are as fascinating and mysterious as trying to solve a Rubik's cube blindfolded, but our findings beckon further exploration.
The implications of this correlation are as unexpected as discovering a well-done steak in a vegetarian restaurant. While the direct link between 'desktop background' searches and arson remains as elusive as a particularly sneaky cat, our study speaks to the importance of considering unforeseen influences on behavior. As researchers, it is essential to keep our eyes open for sparks of insight, no matter how unconventional they may seem. After all, in the world of science, uncovering unforeseen correlations could be the kindling that sets the fire of innovation ablaze.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Several studies have delved into the complex topic of arson patterns and their potential drivers. Smith et al., in "Examining Arson Incidents in Massachusetts," conducted a comprehensive analysis of arson incidents in the Bay State from 2000 to 2015, focusing on demographic, socioeconomic, and environmental factors. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones, in "Behavioral Influences on Arson," explored the psychological and behavioral aspects influencing arson perpetration, considering variables such as impulsivity, aggression, and psychiatric disorders among perpetrators.
Now, let's dive into the intersection of unconventional correlations and unexpected influences. In "The Unlikely Connect: An Exploration of Seemingly Unrelated Trends," Lorem and Ipsum navigated the curious territory of ostensibly unconnected phenomena and the potential threads that tie them together.
Turning to non-fiction works, books such as "The Subconscious Universe: Uncovering Hidden Influences" by John A. Smith and "Outliers: The Story of Success" by Malcolm Gladwell present thought-provoking perspectives on the hidden forces that shape human behavior and decision-making, offering valuable insight into the intricacies of seemingly unrelated phenomena.
On a more light-hearted note, the fictitious works "The Secret Life of Desktop Backgrounds" by Jane Doe and "Arson & Aesthetics: Unraveling the Visual Charms" by John Smith, though not grounded in reality, playfully engage with the intriguing idea of aesthetic influences on behavior, posing imaginative scenarios that entertain the possibility of desktop backgrounds exerting an unexpected sway.
Furthermore, films such as "Inferno Search: The Arson Mystery" and "Aesthetic Alibis" offer cinematic explorations of the perplexing connection between arson in Massachusetts and the allure of visually captivating desktop backgrounds, weaving thrilling narratives that captivate the imagination while skirting the edges of plausibility.
In the following section, we will uncover the unexpected twists and turns of our own research findings, shedding light on the enigmatic correlation between arson incidents in Massachusetts and the frequency of Google searches for 'desktop background.' But first, let's take a moment to appreciate the lighter side of correlation research with a dad joke: Why do computer desktops make terrible thieves? Because they always get caught in the background!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Massachusetts and Google searches for 'desktop background'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends . You used data from 2007 to 2022
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Ablaze in the Bay State: The Correlation Between Arson and Searches for 'Desktop Background'
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper examines the intriguing relationship between arson incidents in Massachusetts and the frequency of Google searches for 'desktop background' over a span of 15 years. Drawing from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends, our study delves into the enigmatic link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.
The findings, much like a well-timed dad joke, bring a surprising twist. Our analysis reveals a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9613012 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2007 to 2022. This correlation stands out like a flamingo in a flock of pigeons, prompting further investigation into the factors driving this unexpected connection.
The implications of this correlation are not to be brushed off like ashes. While the exact nature of the relationship remains shrouded in mystery, our study sheds light on a potentially unsuspected influence on arson patterns in the Bay State. As we move forward, it is important for policymakers and researchers to consider the seemingly whimsical yet influential factors at play, such as the allure of aesthetically pleasing desktop backgrounds in the digital age. After all, when it comes to uncovering unusual correlations, this research uncovers sparks of insight that are, quite literally, fire.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the saying goes, "Where there's smoke, there's fire." In the realm of research, our team has taken this adage quite literally as we delved into the smoldering world of arson incidents in the Bay State. However, though our investigation ignited curiosity, we ended up fanning the flames of discovery in unexpected directions. Our study has uncovered a correlation that can best be described as "hot" - we're not just talking about the heat from arson, but also the scorching relationship between arson incidents in Massachusetts and the frequency of Google searches for 'desktop background.'
It is often said that research can be a bit of a gamble, like betting on the likelihood of a cat igniting a candle with its curiosity. In this case, our bet paid off. Our analysis has unearthed a correlation coefficient so strong, it’s as if statistical significance and the association between arson in Massachusetts and searches for 'desktop background' were tied together like a pair of mismatched socks. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9613012 and a p-value that's nigh impossible to ignore, our findings have set the world of correlation studies ablaze.
What could possibly account for this seemingly bizarre association, you may wonder? Could it be that individuals, after searching for the perfect desktop background, find themselves so captivated by the beauty of nature or awe-inspiring scenery that they are less likely to engage in arson? Or perhaps there's a subliminal message in those vibrant desktop images, steering individuals away from arson and towards creating fires of creativity in their workspaces? The possibilities are as fascinating and mysterious as trying to solve a Rubik's cube blindfolded, but our findings beckon further exploration.
The implications of this correlation are as unexpected as discovering a well-done steak in a vegetarian restaurant. While the direct link between 'desktop background' searches and arson remains as elusive as a particularly sneaky cat, our study speaks to the importance of considering unforeseen influences on behavior. As researchers, it is essential to keep our eyes open for sparks of insight, no matter how unconventional they may seem. After all, in the world of science, uncovering unforeseen correlations could be the kindling that sets the fire of innovation ablaze.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To unravel the curious connection between arson in Massachusetts and Google searches for 'desktop background', we employed a combination of rigorous statistical analysis and a pinch of quirky creativity. Our data, gathered from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends, spanned the years 2007 to 2022. We then dived head-first into the labyrinthine world of correlation analysis, treating the data with the care and precision of a scientist crafting the perfect pun – not too forced, but with just the right amount of wit.
First, we cross-validated the arson incident data with the frequency of 'desktop background' searches using robust statistical methods. It was crucial for us to ensure that the relationship wasn't just a fluke – after all, we didn’t want to jump to conclusions like a kangaroo on a pogo stick. Armed with our trusty statistical software, we harnessed the power of correlation coefficients and p-values to make sense of the data. It was like trying to solve a puzzle with pieces that kept changing shape, but we were determined to crack the code.
With the precision of a surgeon and the enthusiasm of a dad telling a pun, we executed time-series analysis to explore the dynamic interplay between arson incidents and 'desktop background' searches over the 15-year period. This allowed us to observe how the correlation evolved over time, uncovering patterns that were as unexpected as finding a four-leaf clover in a field of statistical noise. We also applied sophisticated regression models to untangle the web of potential confounding variables, ensuring that our findings didn’t go up in smoke like a poorly constructed metaphor.
Once we had our results in hand, we interrogated them with the scrutiny of a detective solving a particularly perplexing case. We scrutinized the strength of the correlation coefficient and subjected the p-value to a level of scrutiny that would make a character from a murder mystery novel proud. We then compared our findings to existing literature, much like a bibliophile comparing famous quotes, seeking to place our discovery in the broader landscape of unexpected correlations in the annals of research.
Lastly, we incorporated sensitivity analysis to test the robustness of our findings, scrutinizing our results from every angle like a connoisseur inspecting a fine work of art. We were intent on leaving no stone unturned, knowing that the pursuit of knowledge sometimes requires a touch of madcap dedication.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Massachusetts and Google searches for 'desktop background'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends .
For the time period 2007 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9613012, r-squared of 0.9241001, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Ablaze in the Bay State: The Correlation Between Arson and Searches for 'Desktop Background'
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper examines the intriguing relationship between arson incidents in Massachusetts and the frequency of Google searches for 'desktop background' over a span of 15 years. Drawing from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends, our study delves into the enigmatic link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.
The findings, much like a well-timed dad joke, bring a surprising twist. Our analysis reveals a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9613012 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2007 to 2022. This correlation stands out like a flamingo in a flock of pigeons, prompting further investigation into the factors driving this unexpected connection.
The implications of this correlation are not to be brushed off like ashes. While the exact nature of the relationship remains shrouded in mystery, our study sheds light on a potentially unsuspected influence on arson patterns in the Bay State. As we move forward, it is important for policymakers and researchers to consider the seemingly whimsical yet influential factors at play, such as the allure of aesthetically pleasing desktop backgrounds in the digital age. After all, when it comes to uncovering unusual correlations, this research uncovers sparks of insight that are, quite literally, fire.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As the saying goes, "Where there's smoke, there's fire." In the realm of research, our team has taken this adage quite literally as we delved into the smoldering world of arson incidents in the Bay State. However, though our investigation ignited curiosity, we ended up fanning the flames of discovery in unexpected directions. Our study has uncovered a correlation that can best be described as "hot" - we're not just talking about the heat from arson, but also the scorching relationship between arson incidents in Massachusetts and the frequency of Google searches for 'desktop background.'
It is often said that research can be a bit of a gamble, like betting on the likelihood of a cat igniting a candle with its curiosity. In this case, our bet paid off. Our analysis has unearthed a correlation coefficient so strong, it’s as if statistical significance and the association between arson in Massachusetts and searches for 'desktop background' were tied together like a pair of mismatched socks. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9613012 and a p-value that's nigh impossible to ignore, our findings have set the world of correlation studies ablaze.
What could possibly account for this seemingly bizarre association, you may wonder? Could it be that individuals, after searching for the perfect desktop background, find themselves so captivated by the beauty of nature or awe-inspiring scenery that they are less likely to engage in arson? Or perhaps there's a subliminal message in those vibrant desktop images, steering individuals away from arson and towards creating fires of creativity in their workspaces? The possibilities are as fascinating and mysterious as trying to solve a Rubik's cube blindfolded, but our findings beckon further exploration.
The implications of this correlation are as unexpected as discovering a well-done steak in a vegetarian restaurant. While the direct link between 'desktop background' searches and arson remains as elusive as a particularly sneaky cat, our study speaks to the importance of considering unforeseen influences on behavior. As researchers, it is essential to keep our eyes open for sparks of insight, no matter how unconventional they may seem. After all, in the world of science, uncovering unforeseen correlations could be the kindling that sets the fire of innovation ablaze.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis revealed a striking correlation between arson incidents in Massachusetts and the frequency of Google searches for 'desktop background' from 2007 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.9613012 indicates a remarkably strong connection, akin to finding a perfect pun in a sea of ordinary jokes. This finding suggests that there may be more than meets the eye when it comes to the factors influencing arson patterns in the Bay State.
The r-squared value of 0.9241001 further corroborates the robustness of the correlation, comparable to the reliability of a well-constructed research instrument. This high r-squared value underlines the substantial proportion of variation in arson incidents that can be explained by the frequency of searches for 'desktop background,' leaving little room for doubt regarding the strength of this association.
As the scatterplot in Fig. 1 demonstrates, the data points form a clear, upward trend, resembling the unmistakable pattern of a perfectly executed dad joke – one that draws a chuckle with every repetition. The linear relationship depicted in the figure leaves little room for skepticism about the clear connection between these two variables.
The statistical significance of the correlation, with a p-value of less than 0.01, is as glaring as a flame in the dark, compelling attention and demanding further scrutiny. This p-value underscores the unlikelihood of the observed correlation occurring due to random chance, reinforcing the need to explore the potential mechanisms underlying this unexpected relationship.
In summary, the results of our analysis illuminate a puzzling yet substantial association between arson incidents in Massachusetts and Google searches for 'desktop background.' This serendipitous finding not only ignites curiosity but also offers compelling evidence for the influence of seemingly unrelated variables on criminal behavior. This correlation, much like a well-crafted dad joke, leaves us with more questions than answers, urging further exploration of the intriguing interplay between digital aesthetics and real-world behavior.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Massachusetts and Google searches for 'desktop background'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Ablaze in the Bay State: The Correlation Between Arson and Searches for 'Desktop Background'
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper examines the intriguing relationship between arson incidents in Massachusetts and the frequency of Google searches for 'desktop background' over a span of 15 years. Drawing from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends, our study delves into the enigmatic link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.
The findings, much like a well-timed dad joke, bring a surprising twist. Our analysis reveals a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9613012 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2007 to 2022. This correlation stands out like a flamingo in a flock of pigeons, prompting further investigation into the factors driving this unexpected connection.
The implications of this correlation are not to be brushed off like ashes. While the exact nature of the relationship remains shrouded in mystery, our study sheds light on a potentially unsuspected influence on arson patterns in the Bay State. As we move forward, it is important for policymakers and researchers to consider the seemingly whimsical yet influential factors at play, such as the allure of aesthetically pleasing desktop backgrounds in the digital age. After all, when it comes to uncovering unusual correlations, this research uncovers sparks of insight that are, quite literally, fire.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Several studies have delved into the complex topic of arson patterns and their potential drivers. Smith et al., in "Examining Arson Incidents in Massachusetts," conducted a comprehensive analysis of arson incidents in the Bay State from 2000 to 2015, focusing on demographic, socioeconomic, and environmental factors. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones, in "Behavioral Influences on Arson," explored the psychological and behavioral aspects influencing arson perpetration, considering variables such as impulsivity, aggression, and psychiatric disorders among perpetrators.
Now, let's dive into the intersection of unconventional correlations and unexpected influences. In "The Unlikely Connect: An Exploration of Seemingly Unrelated Trends," Lorem and Ipsum navigated the curious territory of ostensibly unconnected phenomena and the potential threads that tie them together.
Turning to non-fiction works, books such as "The Subconscious Universe: Uncovering Hidden Influences" by John A. Smith and "Outliers: The Story of Success" by Malcolm Gladwell present thought-provoking perspectives on the hidden forces that shape human behavior and decision-making, offering valuable insight into the intricacies of seemingly unrelated phenomena.
On a more light-hearted note, the fictitious works "The Secret Life of Desktop Backgrounds" by Jane Doe and "Arson & Aesthetics: Unraveling the Visual Charms" by John Smith, though not grounded in reality, playfully engage with the intriguing idea of aesthetic influences on behavior, posing imaginative scenarios that entertain the possibility of desktop backgrounds exerting an unexpected sway.
Furthermore, films such as "Inferno Search: The Arson Mystery" and "Aesthetic Alibis" offer cinematic explorations of the perplexing connection between arson in Massachusetts and the allure of visually captivating desktop backgrounds, weaving thrilling narratives that captivate the imagination while skirting the edges of plausibility.
In the following section, we will uncover the unexpected twists and turns of our own research findings, shedding light on the enigmatic correlation between arson incidents in Massachusetts and the frequency of Google searches for 'desktop background.' But first, let's take a moment to appreciate the lighter side of correlation research with a dad joke: Why do computer desktops make terrible thieves? Because they always get caught in the background!
[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis revealed a striking correlation between arson incidents in Massachusetts and the frequency of Google searches for 'desktop background' from 2007 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.9613012 indicates a remarkably strong connection, akin to finding a perfect pun in a sea of ordinary jokes. This finding suggests that there may be more than meets the eye when it comes to the factors influencing arson patterns in the Bay State.
The r-squared value of 0.9241001 further corroborates the robustness of the correlation, comparable to the reliability of a well-constructed research instrument. This high r-squared value underlines the substantial proportion of variation in arson incidents that can be explained by the frequency of searches for 'desktop background,' leaving little room for doubt regarding the strength of this association.
As the scatterplot in Fig. 1 demonstrates, the data points form a clear, upward trend, resembling the unmistakable pattern of a perfectly executed dad joke – one that draws a chuckle with every repetition. The linear relationship depicted in the figure leaves little room for skepticism about the clear connection between these two variables.
The statistical significance of the correlation, with a p-value of less than 0.01, is as glaring as a flame in the dark, compelling attention and demanding further scrutiny. This p-value underscores the unlikelihood of the observed correlation occurring due to random chance, reinforcing the need to explore the potential mechanisms underlying this unexpected relationship.
In summary, the results of our analysis illuminate a puzzling yet substantial association between arson incidents in Massachusetts and Google searches for 'desktop background.' This serendipitous finding not only ignites curiosity but also offers compelling evidence for the influence of seemingly unrelated variables on criminal behavior. This correlation, much like a well-crafted dad joke, leaves us with more questions than answers, urging further exploration of the intriguing interplay between digital aesthetics and real-world behavior.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The findings of this study bring to light an astonishing correlation between arson incidents in Massachusetts and Google searches for 'desktop background.' While this unexpected connection may seem as out of place as a fire extinguisher in a flower shop, our results underscore the significance of exploring seemingly unrelated variables in understanding criminal behavior.
The high correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value support the premise that there is a substantial relationship between these two disparate phenomena. This result stands out like a flamingo wearing a firefighter's hat—surprising yet undeniably attention-grabbing. Moreover, our findings echo the earlier research by Lorem and Ipsum, who ventured into the realm of unusually connected trends. It seems that even the most unexpected correlations can hold remarkable weight, much like a feathered barbell.
The robustness of the correlation, as evidenced by the high r-squared value, emphasizes the considerable proportion of variation in arson incidents that can be explained by Google searches for 'desktop background.' It's as if the desktop backgrounds were playing a leading role in an unexpected drama, much like a pair of socks mysteriously disappearing in the dryer.
The scatterplot depicting the linear relationship between arson incidents and the frequency of 'desktop background' searches is striking in its clarity, reminiscent of the precision of a well-timed dad joke. It illustrates the substantial trend with a precision that would make any statistician crack a smile wider than a data set.
The statistical significance of the correlation further emphasizes the need for a more in-depth investigation into the potential mechanisms underlying this unusual relationship. It's as if the correlation is begging for us to dig deeper, much like a hidden punchline waiting to be uncovered.
Our results align with the lively imagination of Jane Doe and John Smith, who playfully entertained the idea of visual charms influencing criminal behavior. While not grounded in reality, their whimsical scenarios unexpectedly find resonance in our empirical findings. It's as if they cheekily whispered, "I told you so," from the pages of their fictitious works.
By shedding light on this seemingly peculiar correlation, our research emphasizes the importance of considering non-traditional variables in understanding criminal behavior. After all, sometimes the most unexpected variables hold the key to unraveling complex phenomena. In the words of a wise statistician, "You can't spell 'unusual' without 'usual,' but you can certainly uncover unexpected patterns in the usual."
To conclude this discussion section, we leave you with a final dad joke to ponder: Why did the statistician join a conspiracy theory group? Because he couldn't resist a good data plot twist!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Massachusetts and Google searches for 'desktop background'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Ablaze in the Bay State: The Correlation Between Arson and Searches for 'Desktop Background'
[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper examines the intriguing relationship between arson incidents in Massachusetts and the frequency of Google searches for 'desktop background' over a span of 15 years. Drawing from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends, our study delves into the enigmatic link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.
The findings, much like a well-timed dad joke, bring a surprising twist. Our analysis reveals a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9613012 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2007 to 2022. This correlation stands out like a flamingo in a flock of pigeons, prompting further investigation into the factors driving this unexpected connection.
The implications of this correlation are not to be brushed off like ashes. While the exact nature of the relationship remains shrouded in mystery, our study sheds light on a potentially unsuspected influence on arson patterns in the Bay State. As we move forward, it is important for policymakers and researchers to consider the seemingly whimsical yet influential factors at play, such as the allure of aesthetically pleasing desktop backgrounds in the digital age. After all, when it comes to uncovering unusual correlations, this research uncovers sparks of insight that are, quite literally, fire.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
As the saying goes, "Where there's smoke, there's fire." In the realm of research, our team has taken this adage quite literally as we delved into the smoldering world of arson incidents in the Bay State. However, though our investigation ignited curiosity, we ended up fanning the flames of discovery in unexpected directions. Our study has uncovered a correlation that can best be described as "hot" - we're not just talking about the heat from arson, but also the scorching relationship between arson incidents in Massachusetts and the frequency of Google searches for 'desktop background.'
It is often said that research can be a bit of a gamble, like betting on the likelihood of a cat igniting a candle with its curiosity. In this case, our bet paid off. Our analysis has unearthed a correlation coefficient so strong, it’s as if statistical significance and the association between arson in Massachusetts and searches for 'desktop background' were tied together like a pair of mismatched socks. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9613012 and a p-value that's nigh impossible to ignore, our findings have set the world of correlation studies ablaze.
What could possibly account for this seemingly bizarre association, you may wonder? Could it be that individuals, after searching for the perfect desktop background, find themselves so captivated by the beauty of nature or awe-inspiring scenery that they are less likely to engage in arson? Or perhaps there's a subliminal message in those vibrant desktop images, steering individuals away from arson and towards creating fires of creativity in their workspaces? The possibilities are as fascinating and mysterious as trying to solve a Rubik's cube blindfolded, but our findings beckon further exploration.
The implications of this correlation are as unexpected as discovering a well-done steak in a vegetarian restaurant. While the direct link between 'desktop background' searches and arson remains as elusive as a particularly sneaky cat, our study speaks to the importance of considering unforeseen influences on behavior. As researchers, it is essential to keep our eyes open for sparks of insight, no matter how unconventional they may seem. After all, in the world of science, uncovering unforeseen correlations could be the kindling that sets the fire of innovation ablaze.
[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis revealed a striking correlation between arson incidents in Massachusetts and the frequency of Google searches for 'desktop background' from 2007 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.9613012 indicates a remarkably strong connection, akin to finding a perfect pun in a sea of ordinary jokes. This finding suggests that there may be more than meets the eye when it comes to the factors influencing arson patterns in the Bay State.
The r-squared value of 0.9241001 further corroborates the robustness of the correlation, comparable to the reliability of a well-constructed research instrument. This high r-squared value underlines the substantial proportion of variation in arson incidents that can be explained by the frequency of searches for 'desktop background,' leaving little room for doubt regarding the strength of this association.
As the scatterplot in Fig. 1 demonstrates, the data points form a clear, upward trend, resembling the unmistakable pattern of a perfectly executed dad joke – one that draws a chuckle with every repetition. The linear relationship depicted in the figure leaves little room for skepticism about the clear connection between these two variables.
The statistical significance of the correlation, with a p-value of less than 0.01, is as glaring as a flame in the dark, compelling attention and demanding further scrutiny. This p-value underscores the unlikelihood of the observed correlation occurring due to random chance, reinforcing the need to explore the potential mechanisms underlying this unexpected relationship.
In summary, the results of our analysis illuminate a puzzling yet substantial association between arson incidents in Massachusetts and Google searches for 'desktop background.' This serendipitous finding not only ignites curiosity but also offers compelling evidence for the influence of seemingly unrelated variables on criminal behavior. This correlation, much like a well-crafted dad joke, leaves us with more questions than answers, urging further exploration of the intriguing interplay between digital aesthetics and real-world behavior.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our research has shed light on the flaming-hot connection between arson incidents in Massachusetts and Google searches for 'desktop background.' The correlation we've uncovered is as surprising as finding a fire extinguisher in a desert – unexpected, yet undeniably intriguing. Now we could say that arson rates in Massachusetts are all fired up by the search for the perfect desktop background. Talk about setting the screen on fire!
The implications of this correlation extend beyond the realm of statistical analysis. It prompts us to consider the myriad of influences, both rational and unexpected, that may shape human behavior. As researchers, we must remain vigilant for correlations that may seem as improbable as a penguin in the desert, as they may offer key insights into complex social phenomena.
However, we should be cautious not to venture too far into the realm of overinterpretation. After all, correlations cannot always be taken at face value, much like a cake that looks appealing but has a disappointing flavor. But this connection certainly ignites the spark of curiosity, leaving us pondering the myriad possibilities.
In the words of a classic dad joke, it seems we’ve stumbled upon the "arson-mazing" connection between seemingly disparate variables. The strength of this correlation leaves little doubt that further investigation is warranted. However, as for future research, we're confident in asserting that no further research is needed in this area. After all, we've already set the stage on fire with this discovery!
So, while the mystery of the correlation between arson and desktop backgrounds continues to smolder, we can always find comfort in knowing that, much like a well-timed dad joke, science never fails to surprise us.
[Note: The researching team sings in perfect harmony: "No more research needed here; we've already set the stage on fire!"]
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Ablaze in the Bay State: The Correlation Between Arson and Searches for 'Desktop Background'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Pyromaniacal Studies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Ablaze in the Bay State: The Correlation Between Arson and Searches for 'Desktop Background'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Center for Cognitive Fire Studies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Ablaze in the Bay State: The Correlation Between Arson and Searches for 'Desktop Background' with an abstract of This research paper examines the intriguing relationship between arson incidents in Massachusetts and the frequency of Google searches for 'desktop background' over a span of 15 years. Drawing from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends, our study delves into the enigmatic link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.
The findings, much like a well-timed dad joke, bring a surprising twist. Our analysis reveals a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9613012 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 2007 to 2022. This correlation stands out like a flamingo in a flock of pigeons, prompting further investigation into the factors driving this unexpected connection.
The implications of this correlation are not to be brushed off like ashes. While the exact nature of the relationship remains shrouded in mystery, our study sheds light on a potentially unsuspected influence on arson patterns in the Bay State. As we move forward, it is important for policymakers and researchers to consider the seemingly whimsical yet influential factors at play, such as the allure of aesthetically pleasing desktop backgrounds in the digital age. After all, when it comes to uncovering unusual correlations, this research uncovers sparks of insight that are, quite literally, fire.
ChatGPT:
arson incidents Massachusetts, Google searches "desktop background", correlation coefficient arson desktop background searches, FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, Google Trends data analysis, unexpected correlation arson searches, factors driving correlation arson desktop background, influence of desktop background searches on arson patterns Massachusetts, whimsical factors influencing arson patterns, policy implications correlation arson desktop background, surprising correlations in social phenomena
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Arson in MassachusettsDetailed data title: The arson rate per 100,000 residents in Massachusetts
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Arson in Massachusetts
Google searches for 'desktop background'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'desktop background' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
See what else correlates with Google searches for 'desktop background'
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.9241001 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 92.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'desktop background') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Arson in Massachusetts) over the 16 years from 2007 through 2022.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.1E-9. 0.0000000031459567958590400000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.96 in 3.1E-7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 317,868,320 random variables You don't actually need 317 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 15 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 15 because we have two variables measured over a period of 16 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.89, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
Arson in Massachusetts (Arson rate) | 10.6 | 10.6 | 10.7 | 10 | 8.5 | 9.3 | 7.6 | 7.1 | 5.7 | 6.5 | 5.6 | 4.3 | 4.5 | 6.3 | 4.5 | 5.3 |
Google searches for 'desktop background' (Rel. search volume) | 81.8333 | 86.5 | 75.3333 | 66.1667 | 60.3333 | 54.75 | 46.1667 | 41.9167 | 38.8333 | 30.5833 | 26.75 | 23.9167 | 22.4167 | 24.75 | 20 | 22.25 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([10.6,10.6,10.7,10,8.5,9.3,7.6,7.1,5.7,6.5,5.6,4.3,4.5,6.3,4.5,5.3,])
array_2 = np.array([81.8333,86.5,75.3333,66.1667,60.3333,54.75,46.1667,41.9167,38.8333,30.5833,26.75,23.9167,22.4167,24.75,20,22.25,])
array_1_name = "Arson in Massachusetts"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'desktop background'"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Arson in Massachusetts
- Line chart for only Google searches for 'desktop background'
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Ablaze in the Bay State: The Correlation Between Arson and Searches for 'Desktop Background'
Cheers to you for rating this correlation!
Correlation ID: 1930 · Black Variable ID: 20048 · Red Variable ID: 1462