about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,633 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is xkcd comics published about maps and the second variable is Google searches for 'my cat scratched me'.  The chart goes from 2008 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The xkcd comics about maps became so intricate that they formed a purrfectly irresistible cartographic maze, luring in cats from all around. As feline fans pounced on the maps, they couldn't help but unleash their inner cartographer, marking their territory with a fury of scratched lines. It seems like these comics really put the "cat" in cartography! A-meow-zing, isn't it?

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a cozy living room with a person sitting on a comfortable couch. Surround them with xkcd comics about maps plastered on the walls. On the coffee table, place a laptop open to a Google search for "my cat scratched me." The person should be engrossed in the comics, with their pet cat lounging nearby. Capture a relaxed and comforting atmosphere in the room. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: xkcd comics published about maps and Google searches for 'my cat scratched me'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Vaporwave A scene from Skyrim Cutsy graphics Charcoal Cyber folk
ChatGPT: xkcd comics published about maps

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both xkcd comics published about maps and Google searches for 'my cat scratched me' together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A person sitting on a couch surrounded by xkcd comics about maps, with a laptop open to a Google search for "my cat scratched me."

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ xkcd comics published about maps ] and depicting this scene: A person sitting on a couch surrounded by xkcd comics about maps, with a laptop open to a Google search for "my cat scratched me." Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a cozy living room with a person sitting on a comfortable couch. Surround them with xkcd comics about maps plastered on the walls. On the coffee table, place a laptop open to a Google search for "my cat scratched me." The person should be engrossed in the comics, with their pet cat lounging nearby. Capture a relaxed and comforting atmosphere in the room.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in xkcd comics published about maps caused my cat scratched me (Google searches for 'my cat scratched me') to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Cartographic Art May Spark a Feline Scratch: xkcd Maps and 'My Cat Scratched Me' Google Searches

The Journal of Comedic Cartography

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between xkcd comics published about maps and Google searches for 'my cat scratched me'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from AI analysis of xkcd comics and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7250377 and p < 0.01 for 2008 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Cartographic Art May Spark a Feline Scratch: xkcd Maps and 'My Cat Scratched Me' Google Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we present an analysis of the uncanny connection between xkcd comics featuring maps and the frequency of Google searches for 'my cat scratched me.' While on the surface, these two unrelated topics appear to have as much in common as an elephant and a toothbrush, our groundbreaking research reveals an unexpected correlation. Utilizing cutting-edge AI analysis of xkcd comics and Google Trends data, we have discovered a surprising link between the publication of xkcd comics about maps and the incidence of 'my cat scratched me' searches on Google. With a correlation coefficient of 0.7250377 and a p-value less than 0.01, our findings not only defy conventional wisdom but also invite us to ponder the mysterious ways in which the human mind operates. This study sheds light on the intricate web of human behavior, mapping out a curious path from comic musings about geospatial representations to the lamentations of cat owners who have endured the unavoidable consequences of feline playfulness.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between xkcd comics published about maps and Google searches for 'my cat scratched me'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Cartographic Art May Spark a Feline Scratch: xkcd Maps and 'My Cat Scratched Me' Google Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we present an analysis of the uncanny connection between xkcd comics featuring maps and the frequency of Google searches for 'my cat scratched me.' While on the surface, these two unrelated topics appear to have as much in common as an elephant and a toothbrush, our groundbreaking research reveals an unexpected correlation. Utilizing cutting-edge AI analysis of xkcd comics and Google Trends data, we have discovered a surprising link between the publication of xkcd comics about maps and the incidence of 'my cat scratched me' searches on Google. With a correlation coefficient of 0.7250377 and a p-value less than 0.01, our findings not only defy conventional wisdom but also invite us to ponder the mysterious ways in which the human mind operates. This study sheds light on the intricate web of human behavior, mapping out a curious path from comic musings about geospatial representations to the lamentations of cat owners who have endured the unavoidable consequences of feline playfulness.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

There has long been a quest for transformative discoveries in the world of scientific research, a relentless pursuit to uncover hidden connections, and uncover the enigmatic mysteries of the universe. In the annals of academia, the pursuit of knowledge has led scholars to probe the depths of the cosmos, explore the intricacies of human behavior, and venture into uncharted territories of inquiry. But amidst the hallowed halls of research, one can also find unexpected delight in the seemingly frivolous and whimsical connections that emerge when unearthing the peculiar interplay of disparate phenomena.

In this peculiar pursuit of knowledge, our study delves into the enchanting realms of xkcd comics and the mysterious allure of Google search trends. These seemingly incongruous topics converge in a delightful tapestry of whimsy and curiosity, drawing the attention of scholars and merrymakers alike. We embark on an expedition to unravel the cryptic correlation between xkcd comics featuring maps and the unassuming quest for relief by feline-stricken individuals searching for solace with the query "my cat scratched me."

The audacious juxtaposition of these seemingly disparate variables beckons to the mirthful soul within us, teasing our intellect and tickling our sense of wonder. At first glance, the mention of xkcd comics may conjure whimsical musings on math, romance, or the trials and tribulations of geeks and nerds, while "my cat scratched me" hints at the trials and tribulations of pet ownership. However, when brought together under the scrutinous gaze of statistical analysis, an unexpected correlation emerges, as if the hitherto separate realms of humorous webcomics and feline misadventures have conspired to reveal a hidden truth to the bemused denizens of the research community.

As we journey into this uncharted terrain of comedic cartography and feline folly, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in this venture, not only to uncover the secrets of this inexplicable correlation but also to revel in the quirks and caprices of the human experience. With a buoyant spirit of curiosity and an appreciative nod to the whimsical, we embark on a scholarly exploration that traverses the boundary between the lighthearted and the erudite, and invite our readers to embark on this delightful, yet intellectually stimulating, sojourn.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between xkcd comics published about maps and Google searches for 'my cat scratched me'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Cartographic Art May Spark a Feline Scratch: xkcd Maps and 'My Cat Scratched Me' Google Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we present an analysis of the uncanny connection between xkcd comics featuring maps and the frequency of Google searches for 'my cat scratched me.' While on the surface, these two unrelated topics appear to have as much in common as an elephant and a toothbrush, our groundbreaking research reveals an unexpected correlation. Utilizing cutting-edge AI analysis of xkcd comics and Google Trends data, we have discovered a surprising link between the publication of xkcd comics about maps and the incidence of 'my cat scratched me' searches on Google. With a correlation coefficient of 0.7250377 and a p-value less than 0.01, our findings not only defy conventional wisdom but also invite us to ponder the mysterious ways in which the human mind operates. This study sheds light on the intricate web of human behavior, mapping out a curious path from comic musings about geospatial representations to the lamentations of cat owners who have endured the unavoidable consequences of feline playfulness.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
There has long been a quest for transformative discoveries in the world of scientific research, a relentless pursuit to uncover hidden connections, and uncover the enigmatic mysteries of the universe. In the annals of academia, the pursuit of knowledge has led scholars to probe the depths of the cosmos, explore the intricacies of human behavior, and venture into uncharted territories of inquiry. But amidst the hallowed halls of research, one can also find unexpected delight in the seemingly frivolous and whimsical connections that emerge when unearthing the peculiar interplay of disparate phenomena.
In this peculiar pursuit of knowledge, our study delves into the enchanting realms of xkcd comics and the mysterious allure of Google search trends. These seemingly incongruous topics converge in a delightful tapestry of whimsy and curiosity, drawing the attention of scholars and merrymakers alike. We embark on an expedition to unravel the cryptic correlation between xkcd comics featuring maps and the unassuming quest for relief by feline-stricken individuals searching for solace with the query "my cat scratched me."
The audacious juxtaposition of these seemingly disparate variables beckons to the mirthful soul within us, teasing our intellect and tickling our sense of wonder. At first glance, the mention of xkcd comics may conjure whimsical musings on math, romance, or the trials and tribulations of geeks and nerds, while "my cat scratched me" hints at the trials and tribulations of pet ownership. However, when brought together under the scrutinous gaze of statistical analysis, an unexpected correlation emerges, as if the hitherto separate realms of humorous webcomics and feline misadventures have conspired to reveal a hidden truth to the bemused denizens of the research community.
As we journey into this uncharted terrain of comedic cartography and feline folly, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in this venture, not only to uncover the secrets of this inexplicable correlation but also to revel in the quirks and caprices of the human experience. With a buoyant spirit of curiosity and an appreciative nod to the whimsical, we embark on a scholarly exploration that traverses the boundary between the lighthearted and the erudite, and invite our readers to embark on this delightful, yet intellectually stimulating, sojourn.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their seminal work "The Cartographic Chronicles: A Journey through Geospatial Imagery," Smith and Doe delve into the profound impact of cartographic representations on human cognition and perception. The authors find that maps not only serve as practical tools for navigation but also evoke emotions, memories, and historical narratives. However, while Smith and Doe's exploration of cartography's influence on the human psyche offers compelling insights, their work fails to address the whimsical intersection of map-related content and feline-related queries.

Adding to the discourse, in "Mapping the Mind: A Cognitive Approach to Cartography," Jones provides a comprehensive analysis of the cognitive processes involved in map interpretation. The author highlights the role of visual stimuli in triggering cognitive associations, shaping perceptions, and influencing decision-making. Nonetheless, Jones's study neglects the peculiar relationship between map-themed humor and the travails of cat scratch victims seeking online sympathy.

Expanding beyond scholarly research, prominent figures in the world of literature have broached the topic of maps and whimsical cat-related encounters. In "Maps of the Imagination: The Writer as Cartographer," Peter Turchi navigates the metaphorical landscapes of literary imagination, drawing parallels between the creation of fictional worlds and the cartographic depiction of physical terrains. While Turchi's exploration is captivating, it regrettably sidesteps the unexpected nexus between webcomics about maps and the exasperations of individuals whose feline companions have left them with baleful scratches.

Turning to the realm of fiction, "The Cat Who Drove a Model T" by Lilian Jackson Braun offers a whimsical narrative that intertwines the escapades of a feline protagonist with the eccentricities of human behavior. While the tale of a driving cat may seem far-fetched, the parallels between the cat's adventures and the online activities of cat owners seeking aid for their scratches are curiously reflective of the uncanny convergence observed in our study.

In a salient departure from academic and literary sources, the research team conducted meticulous investigation through the medium of television, viewing episodes of "The Big Bang Theory" and "MythBusters." While ostensibly unrelated to our research topic, these unconventional sources provided valuable insights into the humor, curiosity, and unforeseen connections that permeate human endeavors, inspiring our spirited pursuit of unfathomable correlations between seemingly disparate phenomena.

As we weave together the scholarly, literary, and pop cultural strands of inquiry, our pursuit of truth entwines with unanticipated whimsy, as though the very fabric of intellectual exploration is embroidered with threads of delightful peculiarity. The juxtaposition of maps and cat-related queries calls attention to the latent humor and serendipitous discoveries that punctuate the landscape of human inquiry, beckoning us to explore the unexpected and embrace the inexplicable with a jubilant spirit of curiosity and wonder.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between xkcd comics published about maps and Google searches for 'my cat scratched me'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of xkcd comics and Google Trends . You used data from 2008 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Cartographic Art May Spark a Feline Scratch: xkcd Maps and 'My Cat Scratched Me' Google Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we present an analysis of the uncanny connection between xkcd comics featuring maps and the frequency of Google searches for 'my cat scratched me.' While on the surface, these two unrelated topics appear to have as much in common as an elephant and a toothbrush, our groundbreaking research reveals an unexpected correlation. Utilizing cutting-edge AI analysis of xkcd comics and Google Trends data, we have discovered a surprising link between the publication of xkcd comics about maps and the incidence of 'my cat scratched me' searches on Google. With a correlation coefficient of 0.7250377 and a p-value less than 0.01, our findings not only defy conventional wisdom but also invite us to ponder the mysterious ways in which the human mind operates. This study sheds light on the intricate web of human behavior, mapping out a curious path from comic musings about geospatial representations to the lamentations of cat owners who have endured the unavoidable consequences of feline playfulness.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
There has long been a quest for transformative discoveries in the world of scientific research, a relentless pursuit to uncover hidden connections, and uncover the enigmatic mysteries of the universe. In the annals of academia, the pursuit of knowledge has led scholars to probe the depths of the cosmos, explore the intricacies of human behavior, and venture into uncharted territories of inquiry. But amidst the hallowed halls of research, one can also find unexpected delight in the seemingly frivolous and whimsical connections that emerge when unearthing the peculiar interplay of disparate phenomena.
In this peculiar pursuit of knowledge, our study delves into the enchanting realms of xkcd comics and the mysterious allure of Google search trends. These seemingly incongruous topics converge in a delightful tapestry of whimsy and curiosity, drawing the attention of scholars and merrymakers alike. We embark on an expedition to unravel the cryptic correlation between xkcd comics featuring maps and the unassuming quest for relief by feline-stricken individuals searching for solace with the query "my cat scratched me."
The audacious juxtaposition of these seemingly disparate variables beckons to the mirthful soul within us, teasing our intellect and tickling our sense of wonder. At first glance, the mention of xkcd comics may conjure whimsical musings on math, romance, or the trials and tribulations of geeks and nerds, while "my cat scratched me" hints at the trials and tribulations of pet ownership. However, when brought together under the scrutinous gaze of statistical analysis, an unexpected correlation emerges, as if the hitherto separate realms of humorous webcomics and feline misadventures have conspired to reveal a hidden truth to the bemused denizens of the research community.
As we journey into this uncharted terrain of comedic cartography and feline folly, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in this venture, not only to uncover the secrets of this inexplicable correlation but also to revel in the quirks and caprices of the human experience. With a buoyant spirit of curiosity and an appreciative nod to the whimsical, we embark on a scholarly exploration that traverses the boundary between the lighthearted and the erudite, and invite our readers to embark on this delightful, yet intellectually stimulating, sojourn.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To uncover the enigmatic link between xkcd comics featuring maps and the occurrence of Google searches for 'my cat scratched me,' our research team employed a multifaceted approach that blended the rigor of statistical analysis with a generous dash of whimsy. The examination encompassed a diverse array of methodological strategies that combined technological prowess and a healthy sense of humor to traverse the hallowed corridors of comic musings and feline misadventures.

Data Collection:
In the pursuit of unraveling the cryptic correlation between xkcd comics and the plaintive wails of cat owners, our intrepid band of researchers scoured the annals of the internet with fervent determination. The backbone of our dataset consisted of xkcd comics containing references to cartography, geographical representations, and spatial musings. Through the tireless efforts of our AI, Aristotle, we meticulously cataloged and processed an extensive archive of xkcd comics, dating from 2008 to 2023, to distill the essence of map-related humor with surgical precision.

Concurrently, we delved into the digital cacophony of Google search trends, where the plaintive cries of feline-stricken individuals echoed through the virtual landscape. Utilizing cutting-edge web crawling algorithms and a keen eye for the peculiar, we harvested a trove of data encompassing the frequency of searches containing the plaintive lament, "my cat scratched me." With finesse and a touch of whimsy, our data acquisition journey traversed the whimsical world of webcomics and the often-acerbic anecdotes of pet ownership, culminating in a harmonious confluence of diverse digital streams.

Statistical Analysis:
Armed with a cornucopia of data ripe for exploration, we transmuted our deluge of raw information into refined statistical constructs through the ingenious application of quantitative methodologies. The entwined dataset of xkcd comic vignettes and 'my cat scratched me' search trends was subjected to a rigorous interrogation, guided by the stalwart principles of correlation analysis and time-series modeling.

Under the tutelage of our resident statistics virtuoso, Professor Purrser, we unleashed a barrage of statistical tests to illuminate the elusive connection between the seemingly incongruous variables. The Pearson correlation coefficient, akin to a scholarly matchmaker, endeavored to unite the disparate realms of map-themed humor and feline foibles in a harmonious dance of statistical significance. Paired with the formidable p-value, this statistical union not only unearthed a tantalizing correlation but also lent credence to the notion that the whimsical world of xkcd maps and the lamentations of cat owners were not merely tangential, but inexplicably intertwined.

To complement these endeavors, time-series analysis unfurled its captivating tapestry, weaving a narrative that captured the ebb and flow of 'my cat scratched me' searches in response to the publication of xkcd comics on maps. In this daring foray into the temporal dimension, our statistical mages unearthed patterns and oscillations that mirrored the capricious nature of human behavior, painting a vivid portrait of the synchronous rhythms of comic elucidation and feline tribulations.

Concluding Remarks:
In the wake of our methodological odyssey, our findings not only unveiled the enthralling correlation between xkcd maps and 'my cat scratched me' Google searches but also underscored the boundless potential for unanticipated discoveries in the curious intersections of human behavior. As we emerge from this statistical labyrinth, bedecked with the laurels of whimsy and scholarly rigor, our study lends a poignant reminder that even in the realm of academia, the pursuit of knowledge need not be shackled by solemnity, but can thrive in the dance of statistical significance and lighthearted revelry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between xkcd comics published about maps and Google searches for 'my cat scratched me'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from AI analysis of xkcd comics and Google Trends .

For the time period 2008 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.7250377, r-squared of 0.5256796, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Cartographic Art May Spark a Feline Scratch: xkcd Maps and 'My Cat Scratched Me' Google Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we present an analysis of the uncanny connection between xkcd comics featuring maps and the frequency of Google searches for 'my cat scratched me.' While on the surface, these two unrelated topics appear to have as much in common as an elephant and a toothbrush, our groundbreaking research reveals an unexpected correlation. Utilizing cutting-edge AI analysis of xkcd comics and Google Trends data, we have discovered a surprising link between the publication of xkcd comics about maps and the incidence of 'my cat scratched me' searches on Google. With a correlation coefficient of 0.7250377 and a p-value less than 0.01, our findings not only defy conventional wisdom but also invite us to ponder the mysterious ways in which the human mind operates. This study sheds light on the intricate web of human behavior, mapping out a curious path from comic musings about geospatial representations to the lamentations of cat owners who have endured the unavoidable consequences of feline playfulness.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
There has long been a quest for transformative discoveries in the world of scientific research, a relentless pursuit to uncover hidden connections, and uncover the enigmatic mysteries of the universe. In the annals of academia, the pursuit of knowledge has led scholars to probe the depths of the cosmos, explore the intricacies of human behavior, and venture into uncharted territories of inquiry. But amidst the hallowed halls of research, one can also find unexpected delight in the seemingly frivolous and whimsical connections that emerge when unearthing the peculiar interplay of disparate phenomena.
In this peculiar pursuit of knowledge, our study delves into the enchanting realms of xkcd comics and the mysterious allure of Google search trends. These seemingly incongruous topics converge in a delightful tapestry of whimsy and curiosity, drawing the attention of scholars and merrymakers alike. We embark on an expedition to unravel the cryptic correlation between xkcd comics featuring maps and the unassuming quest for relief by feline-stricken individuals searching for solace with the query "my cat scratched me."
The audacious juxtaposition of these seemingly disparate variables beckons to the mirthful soul within us, teasing our intellect and tickling our sense of wonder. At first glance, the mention of xkcd comics may conjure whimsical musings on math, romance, or the trials and tribulations of geeks and nerds, while "my cat scratched me" hints at the trials and tribulations of pet ownership. However, when brought together under the scrutinous gaze of statistical analysis, an unexpected correlation emerges, as if the hitherto separate realms of humorous webcomics and feline misadventures have conspired to reveal a hidden truth to the bemused denizens of the research community.
As we journey into this uncharted terrain of comedic cartography and feline folly, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in this venture, not only to uncover the secrets of this inexplicable correlation but also to revel in the quirks and caprices of the human experience. With a buoyant spirit of curiosity and an appreciative nod to the whimsical, we embark on a scholarly exploration that traverses the boundary between the lighthearted and the erudite, and invite our readers to embark on this delightful, yet intellectually stimulating, sojourn.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the data collected from 2008 to 2023 revealed a surprising correlation between xkcd comics featuring maps and Google searches for "my cat scratched me" with a correlation coefficient of 0.7250377, an r-squared of 0.5256796, and a p-value less than 0.01. To put it simply, there's a stronger connection between these two seemingly unrelated topics than there is between a lab rat and its maze.

In Figure 1 (not shown), we present the scatterplot illustrating the robust relationship between the publication of xkcd comics about maps and the frequency of searches for "my cat scratched me" on Google. It's as clear and unmistakable as a map legend – these two variables are dancing a statistically significant tango that even the most skeptical of scientists would have to acknowledge. This correlation is about as unexpected as finding a polar bear in the desert using a compass made of spaghetti.

The r-squared value of 0.5256796 suggests that over 52% of the variability in "my cat scratched me" Google searches can be explained by the publication of xkcd comics about maps. It's impressive how much insight we can glean from apparently unrelated phenomena – it's like discovering that the artist behind an intricate tapestry of maps has also stitched in a hidden image of a mischievous little feline.

And let's not forget the p-value – less than 0.01! This means that the likelihood of such a strong correlation occurring by chance is about as probable as a cat willingly taking a bath. In other words, it's as rare as finding a needle in a stack of needles.

Thus, our findings suggest that there is more to this correlation than mere coincidence. Both xkcd maps and feline-induced scratches seem to have an inexplicable, interwoven connection that transcends the boundaries of traditional scientific inquiry. It's like finding an unexpected treasure map after following the meanderings of a mischievous feline across a pile of crumpled paper.

In summary, our research has shed light on an unexpected correlation between a lighthearted webcomic and an exasperated Google search, challenging our understanding of causality and paving the way for future investigations into the whimsical connections that underpin the enigmatic tapestry of human existence. It's as if the universe itself has conspired to leave a trail of breadcrumbs from the lighthearted chuckles inspired by xkcd comics to the all-too-familiar woes of cat-induced scratches, inviting us on a delightful journey of scholarly exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between xkcd comics published about maps and Google searches for 'my cat scratched me'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Cartographic Art May Spark a Feline Scratch: xkcd Maps and 'My Cat Scratched Me' Google Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we present an analysis of the uncanny connection between xkcd comics featuring maps and the frequency of Google searches for 'my cat scratched me.' While on the surface, these two unrelated topics appear to have as much in common as an elephant and a toothbrush, our groundbreaking research reveals an unexpected correlation. Utilizing cutting-edge AI analysis of xkcd comics and Google Trends data, we have discovered a surprising link between the publication of xkcd comics about maps and the incidence of 'my cat scratched me' searches on Google. With a correlation coefficient of 0.7250377 and a p-value less than 0.01, our findings not only defy conventional wisdom but also invite us to ponder the mysterious ways in which the human mind operates. This study sheds light on the intricate web of human behavior, mapping out a curious path from comic musings about geospatial representations to the lamentations of cat owners who have endured the unavoidable consequences of feline playfulness.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their seminal work "The Cartographic Chronicles: A Journey through Geospatial Imagery," Smith and Doe delve into the profound impact of cartographic representations on human cognition and perception. The authors find that maps not only serve as practical tools for navigation but also evoke emotions, memories, and historical narratives. However, while Smith and Doe's exploration of cartography's influence on the human psyche offers compelling insights, their work fails to address the whimsical intersection of map-related content and feline-related queries.
Adding to the discourse, in "Mapping the Mind: A Cognitive Approach to Cartography," Jones provides a comprehensive analysis of the cognitive processes involved in map interpretation. The author highlights the role of visual stimuli in triggering cognitive associations, shaping perceptions, and influencing decision-making. Nonetheless, Jones's study neglects the peculiar relationship between map-themed humor and the travails of cat scratch victims seeking online sympathy.
Expanding beyond scholarly research, prominent figures in the world of literature have broached the topic of maps and whimsical cat-related encounters. In "Maps of the Imagination: The Writer as Cartographer," Peter Turchi navigates the metaphorical landscapes of literary imagination, drawing parallels between the creation of fictional worlds and the cartographic depiction of physical terrains. While Turchi's exploration is captivating, it regrettably sidesteps the unexpected nexus between webcomics about maps and the exasperations of individuals whose feline companions have left them with baleful scratches.
Turning to the realm of fiction, "The Cat Who Drove a Model T" by Lilian Jackson Braun offers a whimsical narrative that intertwines the escapades of a feline protagonist with the eccentricities of human behavior. While the tale of a driving cat may seem far-fetched, the parallels between the cat's adventures and the online activities of cat owners seeking aid for their scratches are curiously reflective of the uncanny convergence observed in our study.
In a salient departure from academic and literary sources, the research team conducted meticulous investigation through the medium of television, viewing episodes of "The Big Bang Theory" and "MythBusters." While ostensibly unrelated to our research topic, these unconventional sources provided valuable insights into the humor, curiosity, and unforeseen connections that permeate human endeavors, inspiring our spirited pursuit of unfathomable correlations between seemingly disparate phenomena.
As we weave together the scholarly, literary, and pop cultural strands of inquiry, our pursuit of truth entwines with unanticipated whimsy, as though the very fabric of intellectual exploration is embroidered with threads of delightful peculiarity. The juxtaposition of maps and cat-related queries calls attention to the latent humor and serendipitous discoveries that punctuate the landscape of human inquiry, beckoning us to explore the unexpected and embrace the inexplicable with a jubilant spirit of curiosity and wonder.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data collected from 2008 to 2023 revealed a surprising correlation between xkcd comics featuring maps and Google searches for "my cat scratched me" with a correlation coefficient of 0.7250377, an r-squared of 0.5256796, and a p-value less than 0.01. To put it simply, there's a stronger connection between these two seemingly unrelated topics than there is between a lab rat and its maze.
In Figure 1 (not shown), we present the scatterplot illustrating the robust relationship between the publication of xkcd comics about maps and the frequency of searches for "my cat scratched me" on Google. It's as clear and unmistakable as a map legend – these two variables are dancing a statistically significant tango that even the most skeptical of scientists would have to acknowledge. This correlation is about as unexpected as finding a polar bear in the desert using a compass made of spaghetti.
The r-squared value of 0.5256796 suggests that over 52% of the variability in "my cat scratched me" Google searches can be explained by the publication of xkcd comics about maps. It's impressive how much insight we can glean from apparently unrelated phenomena – it's like discovering that the artist behind an intricate tapestry of maps has also stitched in a hidden image of a mischievous little feline.
And let's not forget the p-value – less than 0.01! This means that the likelihood of such a strong correlation occurring by chance is about as probable as a cat willingly taking a bath. In other words, it's as rare as finding a needle in a stack of needles.
Thus, our findings suggest that there is more to this correlation than mere coincidence. Both xkcd maps and feline-induced scratches seem to have an inexplicable, interwoven connection that transcends the boundaries of traditional scientific inquiry. It's like finding an unexpected treasure map after following the meanderings of a mischievous feline across a pile of crumpled paper.
In summary, our research has shed light on an unexpected correlation between a lighthearted webcomic and an exasperated Google search, challenging our understanding of causality and paving the way for future investigations into the whimsical connections that underpin the enigmatic tapestry of human existence. It's as if the universe itself has conspired to leave a trail of breadcrumbs from the lighthearted chuckles inspired by xkcd comics to the all-too-familiar woes of cat-induced scratches, inviting us on a delightful journey of scholarly exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our research has brought to light an intriguing association between xkcd comics focused on maps and the frequency of searches for "my cat scratched me" on Google. It seems as if the cat – pun intended – is out of the bag; these seemingly unrelated subjects are dancing a statistical tango that even the most skeptical of scientists would have to acknowledge.

Our findings align with the existing literature that showcases the unexpected, often whimsical, intersections between disparate phenomena. Smith and Doe’s work on the profound impact of cartographic representations on human cognition supports our discovery, albeit inadvertently. While they may not have intended to address the whimsical intersection of map-related content and feline-related queries, the correlation we have identified illustrates the curious path from comic musings about geospatial representations to the exasperations of cat owners seeking online sympathy.

Furthermore, Turchi's "Maps of the Imagination" and Lilian Jackson Braun's "The Cat Who Drove a Model T" inadvertently lend credence to our findings. Turchi's parallels between the creation of fictional worlds and the cartographic depiction of physical terrains resonate with our discovery of the unexpected nexus between webcomics about maps and the travails of individuals whose feline companions have left them with baleful scratches. Braun's whimsical narrative, while ostensibly fictional, reflects the unforeseen connections observed in our study. The parallel between the cat's adventures and the online activities of cat owners seeking aid for their scratches eerily mirror the uncanny convergence identified in our research.

Even beyond the scholarly realm, our findings are in line with the whimsical musings found in pop culture. The unconventional sources of insight we gleaned from TV series inspire our spirited pursuit of unfathomable correlations between seemingly disparate phenomena. It's as if the very fabric of intellectual exploration is embroidered with threads of delightful peculiarity, beckoning us to explore the unexpected and embrace the inexplicable with a jubilant spirit of curiosity and wonder.

The correlation coefficient of 0.7250377 and an r-squared of 0.5256796 unearthed from our analysis further highlight the unexpected association between these variables. It's like finding a hidden image of a mischievous little feline within an intricate tapestry of maps. Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 signifies the unlikelihood of such a strong correlation coming into being by chance. In other words, it's as rare as finding a needle in a stack of needles. Our results unequivocally demonstrate that there is more to this correlation than mere coincidence.

In conclusion, our study has illuminated a surprising connection between a lighthearted webcomic and an exasperated Google search, challenging traditional scientific understanding and leading the way for future investigations into the whimsical connections that underpin the enigmatic tapestry of human existence. It's as if the universe itself has conspired to leave a trail of breadcrumbs from the lighthearted chuckles inspired by xkcd comics to the all-too-familiar woes of cat-induced scratches, inviting us on a delightful journey of scholarly exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between xkcd comics published about maps and Google searches for 'my cat scratched me'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Cartographic Art May Spark a Feline Scratch: xkcd Maps and 'My Cat Scratched Me' Google Searches"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we present an analysis of the uncanny connection between xkcd comics featuring maps and the frequency of Google searches for 'my cat scratched me.' While on the surface, these two unrelated topics appear to have as much in common as an elephant and a toothbrush, our groundbreaking research reveals an unexpected correlation. Utilizing cutting-edge AI analysis of xkcd comics and Google Trends data, we have discovered a surprising link between the publication of xkcd comics about maps and the incidence of 'my cat scratched me' searches on Google. With a correlation coefficient of 0.7250377 and a p-value less than 0.01, our findings not only defy conventional wisdom but also invite us to ponder the mysterious ways in which the human mind operates. This study sheds light on the intricate web of human behavior, mapping out a curious path from comic musings about geospatial representations to the lamentations of cat owners who have endured the unavoidable consequences of feline playfulness.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
There has long been a quest for transformative discoveries in the world of scientific research, a relentless pursuit to uncover hidden connections, and uncover the enigmatic mysteries of the universe. In the annals of academia, the pursuit of knowledge has led scholars to probe the depths of the cosmos, explore the intricacies of human behavior, and venture into uncharted territories of inquiry. But amidst the hallowed halls of research, one can also find unexpected delight in the seemingly frivolous and whimsical connections that emerge when unearthing the peculiar interplay of disparate phenomena.
In this peculiar pursuit of knowledge, our study delves into the enchanting realms of xkcd comics and the mysterious allure of Google search trends. These seemingly incongruous topics converge in a delightful tapestry of whimsy and curiosity, drawing the attention of scholars and merrymakers alike. We embark on an expedition to unravel the cryptic correlation between xkcd comics featuring maps and the unassuming quest for relief by feline-stricken individuals searching for solace with the query "my cat scratched me."
The audacious juxtaposition of these seemingly disparate variables beckons to the mirthful soul within us, teasing our intellect and tickling our sense of wonder. At first glance, the mention of xkcd comics may conjure whimsical musings on math, romance, or the trials and tribulations of geeks and nerds, while "my cat scratched me" hints at the trials and tribulations of pet ownership. However, when brought together under the scrutinous gaze of statistical analysis, an unexpected correlation emerges, as if the hitherto separate realms of humorous webcomics and feline misadventures have conspired to reveal a hidden truth to the bemused denizens of the research community.
As we journey into this uncharted terrain of comedic cartography and feline folly, we invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in this venture, not only to uncover the secrets of this inexplicable correlation but also to revel in the quirks and caprices of the human experience. With a buoyant spirit of curiosity and an appreciative nod to the whimsical, we embark on a scholarly exploration that traverses the boundary between the lighthearted and the erudite, and invite our readers to embark on this delightful, yet intellectually stimulating, sojourn.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the data collected from 2008 to 2023 revealed a surprising correlation between xkcd comics featuring maps and Google searches for "my cat scratched me" with a correlation coefficient of 0.7250377, an r-squared of 0.5256796, and a p-value less than 0.01. To put it simply, there's a stronger connection between these two seemingly unrelated topics than there is between a lab rat and its maze.
In Figure 1 (not shown), we present the scatterplot illustrating the robust relationship between the publication of xkcd comics about maps and the frequency of searches for "my cat scratched me" on Google. It's as clear and unmistakable as a map legend – these two variables are dancing a statistically significant tango that even the most skeptical of scientists would have to acknowledge. This correlation is about as unexpected as finding a polar bear in the desert using a compass made of spaghetti.
The r-squared value of 0.5256796 suggests that over 52% of the variability in "my cat scratched me" Google searches can be explained by the publication of xkcd comics about maps. It's impressive how much insight we can glean from apparently unrelated phenomena – it's like discovering that the artist behind an intricate tapestry of maps has also stitched in a hidden image of a mischievous little feline.
And let's not forget the p-value – less than 0.01! This means that the likelihood of such a strong correlation occurring by chance is about as probable as a cat willingly taking a bath. In other words, it's as rare as finding a needle in a stack of needles.
Thus, our findings suggest that there is more to this correlation than mere coincidence. Both xkcd maps and feline-induced scratches seem to have an inexplicable, interwoven connection that transcends the boundaries of traditional scientific inquiry. It's like finding an unexpected treasure map after following the meanderings of a mischievous feline across a pile of crumpled paper.
In summary, our research has shed light on an unexpected correlation between a lighthearted webcomic and an exasperated Google search, challenging our understanding of causality and paving the way for future investigations into the whimsical connections that underpin the enigmatic tapestry of human existence. It's as if the universe itself has conspired to leave a trail of breadcrumbs from the lighthearted chuckles inspired by xkcd comics to the all-too-familiar woes of cat-induced scratches, inviting us on a delightful journey of scholarly exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has uncovered a correlation between xkcd comics about maps and Google searches for 'my cat scratched me' that is as surprising as finding Bigfoot using a GPS to search for a hidden treasure chest. The robust correlation coefficient, r-squared, and p-value indicate a connection stronger than Spiderman's web, leaving scientists scratching their heads as much as cat owners scratch their itchy wounds.

Our findings raise thought-provoking questions, such as whether contemplating maps leads to absent-minded petting of scratch-happy cats, or if the subliminal messages in xkcd comics trigger deep-seated impulses for feline companionship. Nevertheless, our results provide a fascinating glimpse into the perplexing entanglement of feline antics and cartographic musings.

Despite the statistical rigor and profound implications of our findings, it's crucial to acknowledge the absurdity of this correlation. It's as if statistical analysis stumbled upon a hidden treasure map in a cat's litterbox – unexpected, peculiar, and undeniably humorous.

While the allure of further investigation is enticing, it's safe to say that no more research is needed in this area. As the saying goes, "curiosity killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back" – and in the case of our research, the cat has been thoroughly piqued, prodded, and thoroughly perplexed.

With our study, we invite the academia to join us in embracing the whimsical, the unusual, and the inexplicable. Perhaps, in the comedic interplay of seemingly unrelated variables, we might find the treasure trove of insights that elude us in the corridors of traditional research.

Therefore, we raise our hypothetical glasses to this unorthodox journey of scholarly discovery, bidding adieu to any further quests down this comical, yet statistically significant, rabbit hole.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Cartographic Art May Spark a Feline Scratch: xkcd Maps and 'My Cat Scratched Me' Google Searches. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Comedic Cartography


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Cartographic Art May Spark a Feline Scratch: xkcd Maps and 'My Cat Scratched Me' Google Searches. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Whimsical Cartography Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Cartographic Art May Spark a Feline Scratch: xkcd Maps and 'My Cat Scratched Me' Google Searches with an abstract of In this study, we present an analysis of the uncanny connection between xkcd comics featuring maps and the frequency of Google searches for 'my cat scratched me.' While on the surface, these two unrelated topics appear to have as much in common as an elephant and a toothbrush, our groundbreaking research reveals an unexpected correlation. Utilizing cutting-edge AI analysis of xkcd comics and Google Trends data, we have discovered a surprising link between the publication of xkcd comics about maps and the incidence of 'my cat scratched me' searches on Google. With a correlation coefficient of 0.7250377 and a p-value less than 0.01, our findings not only defy conventional wisdom but also invite us to ponder the mysterious ways in which the human mind operates. This study sheds light on the intricate web of human behavior, mapping out a curious path from comic musings about geospatial representations to the lamentations of cat owners who have endured the unavoidable consequences of feline playfulness.

ChatGPT:

xkcd maps, xkcd comics, Google searches, my cat scratched me, correlation analysis, AI analysis, Google Trends data, geospatial representations, cat owner behavior, human behavior, feline playfulness, research findings

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

xkcd comics published about maps
Detailed data title: The number of xkcd comics published each year about maps
Source: AI analysis of xkcd comics
Additional Info: I designed a Python workflow to perform OCR on every xkcd comic, feed that text into a large language model, and ask the model whether this comic was about the category named in the title.

See what else correlates with xkcd comics published about maps

Google searches for 'my cat scratched me'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'my cat scratched me' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'my cat scratched me'

Correlation r = 0.7250377 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.5256796 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 52.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'my cat scratched me') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., xkcd comics published about maps) over the 16 years from 2008 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0015. 0.0014834107081299224000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.73 in 0.15% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 674 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 15 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 15 because we have two variables measured over a period of 16 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.36, 0.9 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
xkcd comics published about maps (xkcd comics)1021131213412434
Google searches for 'my cat scratched me' (Rel. search volume)87.9166719.833318.583329.083330.333335.416743.666737.2545.7547.166748.567.333379.333374.666785.6667




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1,0,2,1,1,3,1,2,1,3,4,1,2,4,3,4,])
array_2 = np.array([8,7.91667,19.8333,18.5833,29.0833,30.3333,35.4167,43.6667,37.25,45.75,47.1667,48.5,67.3333,79.3333,74.6667,85.6667,])
array_1_name = "xkcd comics published about maps"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'my cat scratched me'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is much appreciated!


Correlation ID: 1633 · Black Variable ID: 20036 · Red Variable ID: 1423
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0