Additional Info: I designed a Python workflow to perform OCR on every xkcd comic, feed that text into a large language model, and ask the model whether this comic was about the category named in the title.
Report an error
xkcd comics published about maps correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Google searches for 'dr pepper vs mr pibb' | r=0.77 | 16yrs | No |
Cummins' stock price (CMI) | r=0.77 | 16yrs | Yes! |
Aggregate score of winning team in Copa Libertadores Finals | r=0.76 | 7yrs | No |
Google searches for 'how to apply a tourniquet' | r=0.74 | 16yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'my cat scratched me' | r=0.73 | 16yrs | Yes! |
xkcd comics published about maps also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)