Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
Report an error
Google searches for 'my cat scratched me' correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The TJX Companies' stock price (TJX) | r=0.99 | 16yrs | No |
The Coca-Cola Company's stock price (KO) | r=0.97 | 16yrs | Yes! |
Ticket prices at North American movie theaters | r=0.97 | 15yrs | No |
Average milk produced per cow in the US | r=0.97 | 15yrs | No |
US production of sour cream | r=0.96 | 14yrs | No |
Number of households headed by single fathers in the United States | r=0.96 | 14yrs | No |
US edible fishery product imports | r=0.96 | 14yrs | No |
Johnson & Johnson's stock price (JNJ) | r=0.96 | 16yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'red pill blue pill' meme | r=0.96 | 16yrs | No |
Walmart's stock price (WMT) | r=0.96 | 16yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on new cars | r=0.95 | 15yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in Psychology | r=0.95 | 11yrs | No |
USA Population | r=0.95 | 15yrs | No |
Average household spend on Christmas Gifts | r=0.91 | 15yrs | Yes! |
Pfizer's stock price (PFE) | r=0.89 | 16yrs | No |
Johnson Controls International's stock price (JCI) | r=0.88 | 16yrs | Yes! |
xkcd comics published about maps | r=0.73 | 16yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'my cat scratched me' also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)