about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,135 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Average household spend on Christmas Gifts and the second variable is Google searches for 'my cat scratched me'.  The chart goes from 2008 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The scent of the new toys and treats enticed the cat into a frenzy of gift-protecting instincts, leading to an uptick in surprise attacks on unsuspecting family members.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a holiday-themed living room with warm, cozy lighting. Show a beautifully wrapped cat toy placed next to a luxurious cat bed. Depict a family member presenting the gift to their feline friend, with the cat showing excitement and curiosity towards the toy. As the cat becomes more accustomed to the new gift, illustrate it seeking attention or playfully scratching, indicating its desire for interaction. Finally, depict the owner unintentionally neglecting the cat while busy with holiday preparations, leading the cat to express its frustration. Capture the owner later searching 'my cat scratched me' on Google for advice. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: An increase in Average household spend on Christmas Gifts causes an increase in Google searches for 'my cat scratched me' because when people buy more expensive gifts for their cats, the cats feel entitled to more attention and become more demanding, leading to an increase in scratches as they assert their dominance over their owners.. Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Realistic a Polaroid photo Concept art Hyper-realistic Data cyber art
ChatGPT: Data cyber art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. An increase in Average household spend on Christmas Gifts causes an increase in Google searches for 'my cat scratched me' because when people buy more expensive gifts for their cats, the cats feel entitled to more attention and become more demanding, leading to an increase in scratches as they assert their dominance over their owners.
ChatGPT: Imagine a cozy living room decorated for the holidays with a beautifully wrapped cat toy and a luxurious cat bed. A family member carefully presents the gift to their feline friend, who immediately becomes excited and starts playing with the toy. As the cat becomes more accustomed to the new lavish gift, it seeks more attention from its owner. The owner, occupied with holiday preparations, inadvertently gives less attention to the cat. In turn, the cat expresses its frustration by playfully scratching or asserting dominance, prompting the owner to later search 'my cat scratched me' on Google for advice.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Data cyber art ] and depicting this scene: Imagine a cozy living room decorated for the holidays with a beautifully wrapped cat toy and a luxurious cat bed. A family member carefully presents the gift to their feline friend, who immediately becomes excited and starts playing with the toy. As the cat becomes more accustomed to the new lavish gift, it seeks more attention from its owner. The owner, occupied with holiday preparations, inadvertently gives less attention to the cat. In turn, the cat expresses its frustration by playfully scratching or asserting dominance, prompting the owner to later search 'my cat scratched me' on Google for advice. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a holiday-themed living room with warm, cozy lighting. Show a beautifully wrapped cat toy placed next to a luxurious cat bed. Depict a family member presenting the gift to their feline friend, with the cat showing excitement and curiosity towards the toy. As the cat becomes more accustomed to the new gift, illustrate it seeking attention or playfully scratching, indicating its desire for interaction. Finally, depict the owner unintentionally neglecting the cat while busy with holiday preparations, leading the cat to express its frustration. Capture the owner later searching 'my cat scratched me' on Google for advice.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humerus responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Average household spend on Christmas Gifts caused my cat scratched me (Google searches for 'my cat scratched me') to increase. Make it silly.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Catty Christmas: Correlating Average Household Spend on Christmas Gifts with Google Searches for 'My Cat Scratched Me'

The Journal of Feline Festivities

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average household spend on Christmas Gifts and Google searches for 'my cat scratched me'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Demandsage and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9057093 and p < 0.01 for 2008 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Catty Christmas: Correlating Average Household Spend on Christmas Gifts with Google Searches for 'My Cat Scratched Me'

[[ABSTRACT]]
The quest to unravel the mysterious and often inexplicable connections in consumer behavior has led to inconceivable findings that extend far beyond the realm of logic. In this study, we investigated the unexpected relationship between average household expenditures on Christmas gifts and Google searches for the peculiar and perplexing query, "my cat scratched me." Utilizing data from Demandsage and Google Trends, we meticulously analyzed patterns from 2008 to 2022. Our analysis revealed a shockingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9057093, with a p-value less than 0.01, unearthing a peculiar linkage that challenges traditional economic and psychological paradigms. This research presents an intriguing and, dare we say, purrfectly unexpected connection between festive overindulgence and feline-related adversity, shedding light on the perplexing and often unexplored complexities of consumer behavior during the holiday season.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average household spend on Christmas Gifts and Google searches for 'my cat scratched me'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Catty Christmas: Correlating Average Household Spend on Christmas Gifts with Google Searches for 'My Cat Scratched Me'

[[ABSTRACT]]
The quest to unravel the mysterious and often inexplicable connections in consumer behavior has led to inconceivable findings that extend far beyond the realm of logic. In this study, we investigated the unexpected relationship between average household expenditures on Christmas gifts and Google searches for the peculiar and perplexing query, "my cat scratched me." Utilizing data from Demandsage and Google Trends, we meticulously analyzed patterns from 2008 to 2022. Our analysis revealed a shockingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9057093, with a p-value less than 0.01, unearthing a peculiar linkage that challenges traditional economic and psychological paradigms. This research presents an intriguing and, dare we say, purrfectly unexpected connection between festive overindulgence and feline-related adversity, shedding light on the perplexing and often unexplored complexities of consumer behavior during the holiday season.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

The holiday season is a time of merriment, extravagance, and, apparently, curious feline-related incidences. As consumers engage in the age-old tradition of generous gift-giving and festive revelry, it appears that our furry companions, particularly the felicitous feline variety, have a penchant for making their presence known in ways that certainly do not align with the holiday spirit. In this study, we delve into the uncharted territory of consumer behavior by examining the correlation between the average household spend on Christmas gifts and the surprisingly common phenomenon of individuals searching "my cat scratched me" on the ubiquitous search engine, Google.

Our investigation aims to uncover the unexpected connection between the yuletide propensity for extravagant shopping and the inexplicable surge in Google queries related to cat-inflicted injuries. Despite the initial absurdity of such an inquiry, the preliminary evidence from our exploratory analysis suggests a fascinating association that defies conventional economic and psychological explanations. The implications of this study extend beyond the mere whimsical nature of our findings, as they prompt a reevaluation of the underlying motivations behind consumer behavior during the festive season and present cat-related incidents as potential indicators of societal trends.

As we embark on this eccentric endeavor, it is crucial to acknowledge the inherent skepticism that may arise when considering the plausibility of a link between holiday spending and feline-induced mishaps. However, it is precisely the intersection of skepticism and open-minded curiosity that propels scientific inquiry towards the unforeseen and the improbable. With this in mind, we present our empirical investigation, which, to our collective bemusement, uncovers a correlation that challenges both reason and rationale, paving the way for further reflection and perhaps a touch of feline folly.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average household spend on Christmas Gifts and Google searches for 'my cat scratched me'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Catty Christmas: Correlating Average Household Spend on Christmas Gifts with Google Searches for 'My Cat Scratched Me'

[[ABSTRACT]]
The quest to unravel the mysterious and often inexplicable connections in consumer behavior has led to inconceivable findings that extend far beyond the realm of logic. In this study, we investigated the unexpected relationship between average household expenditures on Christmas gifts and Google searches for the peculiar and perplexing query, "my cat scratched me." Utilizing data from Demandsage and Google Trends, we meticulously analyzed patterns from 2008 to 2022. Our analysis revealed a shockingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9057093, with a p-value less than 0.01, unearthing a peculiar linkage that challenges traditional economic and psychological paradigms. This research presents an intriguing and, dare we say, purrfectly unexpected connection between festive overindulgence and feline-related adversity, shedding light on the perplexing and often unexplored complexities of consumer behavior during the holiday season.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The holiday season is a time of merriment, extravagance, and, apparently, curious feline-related incidences. As consumers engage in the age-old tradition of generous gift-giving and festive revelry, it appears that our furry companions, particularly the felicitous feline variety, have a penchant for making their presence known in ways that certainly do not align with the holiday spirit. In this study, we delve into the uncharted territory of consumer behavior by examining the correlation between the average household spend on Christmas gifts and the surprisingly common phenomenon of individuals searching "my cat scratched me" on the ubiquitous search engine, Google.
Our investigation aims to uncover the unexpected connection between the yuletide propensity for extravagant shopping and the inexplicable surge in Google queries related to cat-inflicted injuries. Despite the initial absurdity of such an inquiry, the preliminary evidence from our exploratory analysis suggests a fascinating association that defies conventional economic and psychological explanations. The implications of this study extend beyond the mere whimsical nature of our findings, as they prompt a reevaluation of the underlying motivations behind consumer behavior during the festive season and present cat-related incidents as potential indicators of societal trends.
As we embark on this eccentric endeavor, it is crucial to acknowledge the inherent skepticism that may arise when considering the plausibility of a link between holiday spending and feline-induced mishaps. However, it is precisely the intersection of skepticism and open-minded curiosity that propels scientific inquiry towards the unforeseen and the improbable. With this in mind, we present our empirical investigation, which, to our collective bemusement, uncovers a correlation that challenges both reason and rationale, paving the way for further reflection and perhaps a touch of feline folly.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The literature surrounding the relationship between consumer spending habits and unexpected internet search queries yields a range of theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence. Smith et al. (2017) explored the psychological underpinnings of impulsive buying behavior during the holiday season, shedding light on the emotional and cognitive factors that drive individuals to engage in excessive gift purchasing. Similarly, Doe (2019) delved into the cultural significance of gift-giving rituals, emphasizing the symbolic meanings and social dynamics embedded within the act of exchanging presents during festive occasions. These foundational studies established a robust framework for understanding the complexities of consumer behavior in the context of holiday festivities.

In "The Economics of Christmas" by Waldfogel (2009), the author introduced the concept of "deadweight loss of Christmas," elucidating the economic inefficiencies associated with gift-giving, whereby the value of presents received is lower than the cost incurred by the giver. Despite the serious tone of the book, one cannot help but ponder the existential plight of undesirable gifts, destined to languish in the depths of forgotten drawers and closets.

Turning to the world of fiction, "A Christmas Carol" by Charles Dickens offers a timeless depiction of holiday generosity and redemption, albeit without explicit reference to feline-related incidents. Nevertheless, the ghostly visitations and moral transformation of Ebenezer Scrooge serve as a poignant reminder of the transformative power of the holiday spirit, perhaps inspiring both heartwarming acts of kindness and the inexplicable urge to search for feline-related mishaps on the internet.

While the aforementioned sources provide valuable insights into the multifaceted nature of holiday-related expenditures and societal customs, our quest for understanding extends beyond the confines of traditional literature. In a departure from conventional research methods, the authors took an unconventional approach to the literature review, perusing an eclectic array of materials, including but not limited to holiday-themed cat memes, Santa-themed conspiracy theories, and, shall we say, curiously enlightening observations from the backs of CVS receipts. Although unorthodox, this unbounded exploration allowed for the uncanny unearthing of unforeseen connections and amusing anecdotes that undoubtedly enriched the scholarly pursuit of knowledge.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average household spend on Christmas Gifts and Google searches for 'my cat scratched me'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Demandsage and Google Trends . You used data from 2008 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Catty Christmas: Correlating Average Household Spend on Christmas Gifts with Google Searches for 'My Cat Scratched Me'

[[ABSTRACT]]
The quest to unravel the mysterious and often inexplicable connections in consumer behavior has led to inconceivable findings that extend far beyond the realm of logic. In this study, we investigated the unexpected relationship between average household expenditures on Christmas gifts and Google searches for the peculiar and perplexing query, "my cat scratched me." Utilizing data from Demandsage and Google Trends, we meticulously analyzed patterns from 2008 to 2022. Our analysis revealed a shockingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9057093, with a p-value less than 0.01, unearthing a peculiar linkage that challenges traditional economic and psychological paradigms. This research presents an intriguing and, dare we say, purrfectly unexpected connection between festive overindulgence and feline-related adversity, shedding light on the perplexing and often unexplored complexities of consumer behavior during the holiday season.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The holiday season is a time of merriment, extravagance, and, apparently, curious feline-related incidences. As consumers engage in the age-old tradition of generous gift-giving and festive revelry, it appears that our furry companions, particularly the felicitous feline variety, have a penchant for making their presence known in ways that certainly do not align with the holiday spirit. In this study, we delve into the uncharted territory of consumer behavior by examining the correlation between the average household spend on Christmas gifts and the surprisingly common phenomenon of individuals searching "my cat scratched me" on the ubiquitous search engine, Google.
Our investigation aims to uncover the unexpected connection between the yuletide propensity for extravagant shopping and the inexplicable surge in Google queries related to cat-inflicted injuries. Despite the initial absurdity of such an inquiry, the preliminary evidence from our exploratory analysis suggests a fascinating association that defies conventional economic and psychological explanations. The implications of this study extend beyond the mere whimsical nature of our findings, as they prompt a reevaluation of the underlying motivations behind consumer behavior during the festive season and present cat-related incidents as potential indicators of societal trends.
As we embark on this eccentric endeavor, it is crucial to acknowledge the inherent skepticism that may arise when considering the plausibility of a link between holiday spending and feline-induced mishaps. However, it is precisely the intersection of skepticism and open-minded curiosity that propels scientific inquiry towards the unforeseen and the improbable. With this in mind, we present our empirical investigation, which, to our collective bemusement, uncovers a correlation that challenges both reason and rationale, paving the way for further reflection and perhaps a touch of feline folly.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Our study aimed to meticulously investigate the enigmatic correlation between average household spend on Christmas gifts and the inexplicable surge in Google searches for 'my cat scratched me.' The perplexing nature of this endeavor necessitated a methodological approach that was as intricate as it was, dare we say, whimsically ponderous.

1. Data Collection:
In our pursuit of unraveling this extraordinary connection, we scoured the virtual realm, harnessing the data omnipotence of Demandsage and Google Trends. We conscientiously gathered information spanning from the year 2008 through 2022, casting a wide net to ensnare the most comprehensive representation of consumer behavior and, evidently, feline-related tribulations.

2. Festive Extrapolation Analysis:
Our team of research aficionados engaged in the complex art of festive extrapolation analysis, where we deftly dissected the average household expenditures on Christmas gifts into their elemental whimsical whimsies. By scrutinizing the ebbs and flows of festive spending, we endeavored to capture the essence of consumer indulgence during the holiday season, all while avoiding the siren call of peppermint-scented merriment that often distracts even the most steadfast researcher.

3. Feline-Focused Search Query Scrutiny:
Delving into the murky depths of data analysis, we meticulously monitored Google searches containing the cryptic and wholly unexpected query, "my cat scratched me." This search query, albeit seemingly innocuous, proved to be a reliable indicator of feline-induced mishaps, serving as a whimsical litmus test for the curious confluence of holiday exuberance and feline-related maladies.

4. Statistical Sorcery:
Armed with an arsenal of statistical incantations and convoluted computations, we unleashed the formidable power of correlation analysis upon the amalgamated data. With bated breath and a sprinkle of statistical stardust, we summoned the correlation coefficient and p-value to discern the elusive relationship between Christmas spending and feline folly. The resulting statistical cacophony bestowed upon us a correlation coefficient of 0.9057093, accompanied by a p-value less than 0.01, thus revealing a correlation so staggering that it could rival the most confounding of cat-induced capers.

5. Peer Validation:
To ensure the veracity and integrity of our findings, we subjected them to rigorous peer validation, presenting our confounding correlation to esteemed colleagues and bemusing them with the unexpected nature of our unearthed connection.

6. Ethical Considerations:
As with any groundbreaking research endeavor, we held steadfast to the tenets of ethical research conduct, ensuring the protection of feline privacy and the sanctity of holiday merriment throughout our whimsical odyssey. Any feline-related data was handled with the utmost care and reverence, acknowledging the sacredness of cats and the solemn duty of unraveling their inexplicable influence on the holiday spirit.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average household spend on Christmas Gifts and Google searches for 'my cat scratched me'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Demandsage and Google Trends .

For the time period 2008 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9057093, r-squared of 0.8203094, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Catty Christmas: Correlating Average Household Spend on Christmas Gifts with Google Searches for 'My Cat Scratched Me'

[[ABSTRACT]]
The quest to unravel the mysterious and often inexplicable connections in consumer behavior has led to inconceivable findings that extend far beyond the realm of logic. In this study, we investigated the unexpected relationship between average household expenditures on Christmas gifts and Google searches for the peculiar and perplexing query, "my cat scratched me." Utilizing data from Demandsage and Google Trends, we meticulously analyzed patterns from 2008 to 2022. Our analysis revealed a shockingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9057093, with a p-value less than 0.01, unearthing a peculiar linkage that challenges traditional economic and psychological paradigms. This research presents an intriguing and, dare we say, purrfectly unexpected connection between festive overindulgence and feline-related adversity, shedding light on the perplexing and often unexplored complexities of consumer behavior during the holiday season.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
The holiday season is a time of merriment, extravagance, and, apparently, curious feline-related incidences. As consumers engage in the age-old tradition of generous gift-giving and festive revelry, it appears that our furry companions, particularly the felicitous feline variety, have a penchant for making their presence known in ways that certainly do not align with the holiday spirit. In this study, we delve into the uncharted territory of consumer behavior by examining the correlation between the average household spend on Christmas gifts and the surprisingly common phenomenon of individuals searching "my cat scratched me" on the ubiquitous search engine, Google.
Our investigation aims to uncover the unexpected connection between the yuletide propensity for extravagant shopping and the inexplicable surge in Google queries related to cat-inflicted injuries. Despite the initial absurdity of such an inquiry, the preliminary evidence from our exploratory analysis suggests a fascinating association that defies conventional economic and psychological explanations. The implications of this study extend beyond the mere whimsical nature of our findings, as they prompt a reevaluation of the underlying motivations behind consumer behavior during the festive season and present cat-related incidents as potential indicators of societal trends.
As we embark on this eccentric endeavor, it is crucial to acknowledge the inherent skepticism that may arise when considering the plausibility of a link between holiday spending and feline-induced mishaps. However, it is precisely the intersection of skepticism and open-minded curiosity that propels scientific inquiry towards the unforeseen and the improbable. With this in mind, we present our empirical investigation, which, to our collective bemusement, uncovers a correlation that challenges both reason and rationale, paving the way for further reflection and perhaps a touch of feline folly.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data obtained from 2008 to 2022 yielded a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9057093 between average household spend on Christmas gifts and Google searches for "my cat scratched me." This correlation signifies a strong positive relationship between the two seemingly disparate variables. The r-squared value of 0.8203094 indicates that approximately 82.03% of the variance in Google searches for cat-related mishaps can be explained by the variation in holiday spending. With a p-value of less than 0.01, the correlation is considered statistically significant, further emphasizing the robustness of this unexpected association.

As highlighted in Fig. 1, the scatterplot visually represents the strong positive correlation between average household spend on Christmas gifts and Google searches for "my cat scratched me." The data points form a clear upward trend, affirming the peculiar relationship between festive shopping tendencies and feline-related adversities. It appears that as households splurge on holiday gifts, there is a noteworthy increase in individuals seeking solace from their feline companions' unanticipated affections, as evidenced by the surge in Google searches related to cat-induced injuries.

The findings from this study not only provide empirical evidence of a surprising correlation but also offer a unique lens through which to view consumer behavior during the holiday season. The unearthing of such an unexpected connection prompts contemplation on the underlying motivations and psychological underpinnings of festive spending and the proclivity for feline-related inquiries. It seems that amidst the joyous festivity of the holiday season, our feline friends have managed to leave an indelible mark on consumer behavior, quite literally, in some cases.

While the implications of these findings may raise eyebrows and elicit a fair share of bemusement, they offer an intriguing glimpse into the intricate and often unexplored interplay between consumer habits and seemingly unrelated phenomena. The purrplexing correlation uncovered in this study serves as a testament to the unending capacity for surprise and bemusement in the realm of empirical inquiry, proving that even the most improbable connections can unveil valuable insights, and perhaps a touch of lighthearted amusement, in the pursuit of understanding human behavior.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average household spend on Christmas Gifts and Google searches for 'my cat scratched me'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Catty Christmas: Correlating Average Household Spend on Christmas Gifts with Google Searches for 'My Cat Scratched Me'

[[ABSTRACT]]
The quest to unravel the mysterious and often inexplicable connections in consumer behavior has led to inconceivable findings that extend far beyond the realm of logic. In this study, we investigated the unexpected relationship between average household expenditures on Christmas gifts and Google searches for the peculiar and perplexing query, "my cat scratched me." Utilizing data from Demandsage and Google Trends, we meticulously analyzed patterns from 2008 to 2022. Our analysis revealed a shockingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9057093, with a p-value less than 0.01, unearthing a peculiar linkage that challenges traditional economic and psychological paradigms. This research presents an intriguing and, dare we say, purrfectly unexpected connection between festive overindulgence and feline-related adversity, shedding light on the perplexing and often unexplored complexities of consumer behavior during the holiday season.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The literature surrounding the relationship between consumer spending habits and unexpected internet search queries yields a range of theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence. Smith et al. (2017) explored the psychological underpinnings of impulsive buying behavior during the holiday season, shedding light on the emotional and cognitive factors that drive individuals to engage in excessive gift purchasing. Similarly, Doe (2019) delved into the cultural significance of gift-giving rituals, emphasizing the symbolic meanings and social dynamics embedded within the act of exchanging presents during festive occasions. These foundational studies established a robust framework for understanding the complexities of consumer behavior in the context of holiday festivities.
In "The Economics of Christmas" by Waldfogel (2009), the author introduced the concept of "deadweight loss of Christmas," elucidating the economic inefficiencies associated with gift-giving, whereby the value of presents received is lower than the cost incurred by the giver. Despite the serious tone of the book, one cannot help but ponder the existential plight of undesirable gifts, destined to languish in the depths of forgotten drawers and closets.
Turning to the world of fiction, "A Christmas Carol" by Charles Dickens offers a timeless depiction of holiday generosity and redemption, albeit without explicit reference to feline-related incidents. Nevertheless, the ghostly visitations and moral transformation of Ebenezer Scrooge serve as a poignant reminder of the transformative power of the holiday spirit, perhaps inspiring both heartwarming acts of kindness and the inexplicable urge to search for feline-related mishaps on the internet.
While the aforementioned sources provide valuable insights into the multifaceted nature of holiday-related expenditures and societal customs, our quest for understanding extends beyond the confines of traditional literature. In a departure from conventional research methods, the authors took an unconventional approach to the literature review, perusing an eclectic array of materials, including but not limited to holiday-themed cat memes, Santa-themed conspiracy theories, and, shall we say, curiously enlightening observations from the backs of CVS receipts. Although unorthodox, this unbounded exploration allowed for the uncanny unearthing of unforeseen connections and amusing anecdotes that undoubtedly enriched the scholarly pursuit of knowledge.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data obtained from 2008 to 2022 yielded a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9057093 between average household spend on Christmas gifts and Google searches for "my cat scratched me." This correlation signifies a strong positive relationship between the two seemingly disparate variables. The r-squared value of 0.8203094 indicates that approximately 82.03% of the variance in Google searches for cat-related mishaps can be explained by the variation in holiday spending. With a p-value of less than 0.01, the correlation is considered statistically significant, further emphasizing the robustness of this unexpected association.
As highlighted in Fig. 1, the scatterplot visually represents the strong positive correlation between average household spend on Christmas gifts and Google searches for "my cat scratched me." The data points form a clear upward trend, affirming the peculiar relationship between festive shopping tendencies and feline-related adversities. It appears that as households splurge on holiday gifts, there is a noteworthy increase in individuals seeking solace from their feline companions' unanticipated affections, as evidenced by the surge in Google searches related to cat-induced injuries.
The findings from this study not only provide empirical evidence of a surprising correlation but also offer a unique lens through which to view consumer behavior during the holiday season. The unearthing of such an unexpected connection prompts contemplation on the underlying motivations and psychological underpinnings of festive spending and the proclivity for feline-related inquiries. It seems that amidst the joyous festivity of the holiday season, our feline friends have managed to leave an indelible mark on consumer behavior, quite literally, in some cases.
While the implications of these findings may raise eyebrows and elicit a fair share of bemusement, they offer an intriguing glimpse into the intricate and often unexplored interplay between consumer habits and seemingly unrelated phenomena. The purrplexing correlation uncovered in this study serves as a testament to the unending capacity for surprise and bemusement in the realm of empirical inquiry, proving that even the most improbable connections can unveil valuable insights, and perhaps a touch of lighthearted amusement, in the pursuit of understanding human behavior.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of this study not only affirm the unexpected linkage between consumer spending during the holiday season and searches for feline-induced afflictions but also shed light on the enigmatic interplay of human behavior in response to festive indulgence. The remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9057093 between average household expenditure on Christmas gifts and Google searches for "my cat scratched me" echoes the sentiment that amidst the joyful cacophony of the yuletide season, our feline companions have managed to insinuate themselves into the fabric of consumer behavior in unforeseen ways.

Our results harmonize with prior research by Smith et al. (2017) and Doe (2019), which elucidated the emotional and cultural underpinnings of holiday shopping, thereby establishing a robust theoretical groundwork for our investigation. The unexpected connection discovered in our study adds a whimsical yet pertinent dimension to existing literature, underscoring the multifaceted and, dare we say, "claw-ver" aspects of consumer behavior during festive occasions. It is as if, in the grand tapestry of holiday extravagance, the feline presence manifests as an unexpected yet undeniable thread, weaving its way into the very fabric of our economic and psychological whims.

The results not only corroborate our initial hypotheses but also invite contemplation on the underlying motivations driving individuals to engage in extravagant gift-giving practices and seek solace from the well-documented potential hazards of feline companionship. The statistically significant correlation observed between festive spending and inquiries into feline-related mishaps suggests that as the opulence of holiday gifts increases, so does the likelihood of encounters with our capricious and, at times, sharp-clawed feline friends.

Our unorthodox literature review, which delved into unconventional sources such as holiday-themed cat memes and obscure observations from retail receipts, provided an unexpectedly fertile ground for unearthing remarkably informative and, at times, amusing insights. The unbounded pursuit of knowledge, much like an inquisitive feline, led to the discovery of the improbable yet undeniably robust relationship between holiday spending and feline-related mishaps, underscoring the whimsical and unpredictable nature of scholarly inquiry.

In summary, the unexpected correlation uncovered in this study not only challenges traditional economic and psychological paradigms but also invites a mirthful contemplation of the intricate interplay between nostalgia, consumer fervor, and our endearing yet occasionally hazardous feline companions. This study serves as a testament to the boundless capacity for surprise and amusement in empirical inquiry, reaffirming that even the most improbable connections can yield valuable insights and, of course, a touch of lighthearted delight, in the quest to understand human behavior.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Average household spend on Christmas Gifts and Google searches for 'my cat scratched me'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Catty Christmas: Correlating Average Household Spend on Christmas Gifts with Google Searches for 'My Cat Scratched Me'

[[ABSTRACT]]
The quest to unravel the mysterious and often inexplicable connections in consumer behavior has led to inconceivable findings that extend far beyond the realm of logic. In this study, we investigated the unexpected relationship between average household expenditures on Christmas gifts and Google searches for the peculiar and perplexing query, "my cat scratched me." Utilizing data from Demandsage and Google Trends, we meticulously analyzed patterns from 2008 to 2022. Our analysis revealed a shockingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9057093, with a p-value less than 0.01, unearthing a peculiar linkage that challenges traditional economic and psychological paradigms. This research presents an intriguing and, dare we say, purrfectly unexpected connection between festive overindulgence and feline-related adversity, shedding light on the perplexing and often unexplored complexities of consumer behavior during the holiday season.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The holiday season is a time of merriment, extravagance, and, apparently, curious feline-related incidences. As consumers engage in the age-old tradition of generous gift-giving and festive revelry, it appears that our furry companions, particularly the felicitous feline variety, have a penchant for making their presence known in ways that certainly do not align with the holiday spirit. In this study, we delve into the uncharted territory of consumer behavior by examining the correlation between the average household spend on Christmas gifts and the surprisingly common phenomenon of individuals searching "my cat scratched me" on the ubiquitous search engine, Google.
Our investigation aims to uncover the unexpected connection between the yuletide propensity for extravagant shopping and the inexplicable surge in Google queries related to cat-inflicted injuries. Despite the initial absurdity of such an inquiry, the preliminary evidence from our exploratory analysis suggests a fascinating association that defies conventional economic and psychological explanations. The implications of this study extend beyond the mere whimsical nature of our findings, as they prompt a reevaluation of the underlying motivations behind consumer behavior during the festive season and present cat-related incidents as potential indicators of societal trends.
As we embark on this eccentric endeavor, it is crucial to acknowledge the inherent skepticism that may arise when considering the plausibility of a link between holiday spending and feline-induced mishaps. However, it is precisely the intersection of skepticism and open-minded curiosity that propels scientific inquiry towards the unforeseen and the improbable. With this in mind, we present our empirical investigation, which, to our collective bemusement, uncovers a correlation that challenges both reason and rationale, paving the way for further reflection and perhaps a touch of feline folly.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data obtained from 2008 to 2022 yielded a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9057093 between average household spend on Christmas gifts and Google searches for "my cat scratched me." This correlation signifies a strong positive relationship between the two seemingly disparate variables. The r-squared value of 0.8203094 indicates that approximately 82.03% of the variance in Google searches for cat-related mishaps can be explained by the variation in holiday spending. With a p-value of less than 0.01, the correlation is considered statistically significant, further emphasizing the robustness of this unexpected association.
As highlighted in Fig. 1, the scatterplot visually represents the strong positive correlation between average household spend on Christmas gifts and Google searches for "my cat scratched me." The data points form a clear upward trend, affirming the peculiar relationship between festive shopping tendencies and feline-related adversities. It appears that as households splurge on holiday gifts, there is a noteworthy increase in individuals seeking solace from their feline companions' unanticipated affections, as evidenced by the surge in Google searches related to cat-induced injuries.
The findings from this study not only provide empirical evidence of a surprising correlation but also offer a unique lens through which to view consumer behavior during the holiday season. The unearthing of such an unexpected connection prompts contemplation on the underlying motivations and psychological underpinnings of festive spending and the proclivity for feline-related inquiries. It seems that amidst the joyous festivity of the holiday season, our feline friends have managed to leave an indelible mark on consumer behavior, quite literally, in some cases.
While the implications of these findings may raise eyebrows and elicit a fair share of bemusement, they offer an intriguing glimpse into the intricate and often unexplored interplay between consumer habits and seemingly unrelated phenomena. The purrplexing correlation uncovered in this study serves as a testament to the unending capacity for surprise and bemusement in the realm of empirical inquiry, proving that even the most improbable connections can unveil valuable insights, and perhaps a touch of lighthearted amusement, in the pursuit of understanding human behavior.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has unveiled an unexpectedly strong correlation between average household spend on Christmas gifts and the frequency of Google searches for the cryptic query, "my cat scratched me." While our findings may raise a few whiskers, they underscore the intricate and often unfathomable interplay between consumer behavior and the enigmatic feline predisposition for impulsive acts of affection, often at the expense of their human companions.

The purrplexing nature of this correlation prompts a reexamination of the traditional economic and psychological models, as well as the potential for a feline-induced analysis of festive consumer habits. Our research serves as a whimsical yet enlightening reminder that in the world of consumer behavior, surprises, like unexpected feline encounters, are always lurking around the corner.

As we bid adieu to this peculiar journey of discovery, it is evident that no more research is needed in this area. It appears that we have indeed scratched the surface of this uncanny correlation, leaving no feline-related stone unturned. With that, we encourage fellow researchers to embrace the unexpected, appreciate the whimsical, and remain open to the potential for further curiosity, especially when cats and Christmas gifts are involved.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Catty Christmas: Correlating Average Household Spend on Christmas Gifts with Google Searches for 'My Cat Scratched Me'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Feline Festivities


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Catty Christmas: Correlating Average Household Spend on Christmas Gifts with Google Searches for 'My Cat Scratched Me'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Association for Feline Behavior and Economics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Catty Christmas: Correlating Average Household Spend on Christmas Gifts with Google Searches for 'My Cat Scratched Me' with an abstract of The quest to unravel the mysterious and often inexplicable connections in consumer behavior has led to inconceivable findings that extend far beyond the realm of logic. In this study, we investigated the unexpected relationship between average household expenditures on Christmas gifts and Google searches for the peculiar and perplexing query, "my cat scratched me." Utilizing data from Demandsage and Google Trends, we meticulously analyzed patterns from 2008 to 2022. Our analysis revealed a shockingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9057093, with a p-value less than 0.01, unearthing a peculiar linkage that challenges traditional economic and psychological paradigms. This research presents an intriguing and, dare we say, purrfectly unexpected connection between festive overindulgence and feline-related adversity, shedding light on the perplexing and often unexplored complexities of consumer behavior during the holiday season.

ChatGPT:

average household spend, Christmas gifts, consumer behavior, Google searches, "my cat scratched me", correlation coefficient, Demandsage, Google Trends, consumer behavior during the holiday season

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Average household spend on Christmas Gifts
Detailed data title: Average Christmas Gift Expenditure
Source: Demandsage
See what else correlates with Average household spend on Christmas Gifts

Google searches for 'my cat scratched me'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'my cat scratched me' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'my cat scratched me'

Correlation r = 0.9057093 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8203094 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 82% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'my cat scratched me') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Average household spend on Christmas Gifts) over the 15 years from 2008 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.4E-6. 0.0000033720709654626490000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 0.00034% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 296,554 random variables You don't actually need 296 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 14 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 14 because we have two variables measured over a period of 15 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.73, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Average household spend on Christmas Gifts (Amount dollars)616638714764770704720830752862794846852886942
Google searches for 'my cat scratched me' (Rel. search volume)87.9166719.833318.583329.083330.333335.416743.666737.2545.7547.166748.567.333379.333374.6667




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([616,638,714,764,770,704,720,830,752,862,794,846,852,886,942,])
array_2 = np.array([8,7.91667,19.8333,18.5833,29.0833,30.3333,35.4167,43.6667,37.25,45.75,47.1667,48.5,67.3333,79.3333,74.6667,])
array_1_name = "Average household spend on Christmas Gifts"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'my cat scratched me'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 1135 · Black Variable ID: 35 · Red Variable ID: 1423
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0