Report an error
Average household spend on Christmas Gifts correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Google searches for 'my cat scratched me' | r=0.91 | 15yrs | Yes! |
US GDP per capita | r=0.89 | 14yrs | No |
Global Rice Consumption | r=0.89 | 14yrs | No |
Percentage of Americans with social media profiles | r=0.88 | 14yrs | No |
Votes for Republican Senators in Nevada | r=0.82 | 7yrs | Yes! |
Average household spend on Christmas Gifts also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)