about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,344 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Oliver and the second variable is Dominion Energy's stock price (D).  The chart goes from 2002 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

More people naming their kids Oliver resulted in a shortage of O-names for hurricanes. This led to a decrease in the frequency of named storms, reducing the likelihood of weather-related damage to Dominion Energy's infrastructure.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a Cubism-style image of a bustling playground. In the center, children are gathered around a popular boy named Oliver, participating in various activities under his leadership. Around the outskirts, a large tree with a nest of birds is visible, energetically building and maintaining their home, with the nest being powered by the fluctuating movements symbolized by Dominion Energy's stock. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: Because the name Oliver has become more popular, it has led to an increase in the consumption of olive oil. This surge in olive oil consumption has caused a higher demand for energy to power the machinery used in the production process. As a result, Dominion Energy, as a major energy supplier, has experienced a boost in stock price due to the increased demand for their services. It's truly an "olive oil" phenomenon!. Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Woodblock painting Charcoal Cubism Cute 2D animation An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'
ChatGPT: Cubism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Oliver and Dominion Energy's stock price Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Imagine a bustling playground where kids are playing and there are several groups of children. In the center of the playground, you notice a group of children surrounding a boy named Oliver, who seems to be the most popular among them, as he is the one leading the games and activities, with all the other kids looking up to him. Meanwhile, on the outskirts of the playground, you notice a large tree with a nest of birds who seem to be energetically building and maintaining their home, with the nest being powered by Dominion Energy's stock, as the fluctuating energy and effort of the birds symbolizes the stock's movement in the market.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cubism ] and depicting this scene: Imagine a bustling playground where kids are playing and there are several groups of children. In the center of the playground, you notice a group of children surrounding a boy named Oliver, who seems to be the most popular among them, as he is the one leading the games and activities, with all the other kids looking up to him. Meanwhile, on the outskirts of the playground, you notice a large tree with a nest of birds who seem to be energetically building and maintaining their home, with the nest being powered by Dominion Energy's stock, as the fluctuating energy and effort of the birds symbolizes the stock's movement in the market. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a Cubism-style image of a bustling playground. In the center, children are gathered around a popular boy named Oliver, participating in various activities under his leadership. Around the outskirts, a large tree with a nest of birds is visible, energetically building and maintaining their home, with the nest being powered by the fluctuating movements symbolized by Dominion Energy's stock.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Oliver caused Dominion Energy's stock price (D) to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Oliver Effect: A Shocking Connection to Dominion Energy's Electrifying Stock Performance

The Journal of Energy Dynamics and Financial Analysis

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Oliver and Dominion Energy's stock price (D). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9688613 and p < 0.01 for 2002 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Oliver Effect: A Shocking Connection to Dominion Energy's Electrifying Stock Performance

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the captivating correlation between the popularity of the first name Oliver and the stock price of Dominion Energy (D). Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our research team embarked on a quest to unravel the bewildering mystery surrounding this seemingly incongruous relationship. Our analysis spanned the years 2002 to 2022 and unearthed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9688613, with a significant level denoted by p < 0.01. The implications of this study not only spark curiosity but also shed light on the curious interplay between social phenomena and financial markets. Our findings, though perhaps shocking, present a compelling case for further investigation into the whimsical influence of names on stock dynamics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Oliver and Dominion Energy's stock price (D). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Oliver Effect: A Shocking Connection to Dominion Energy's Electrifying Stock Performance

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the captivating correlation between the popularity of the first name Oliver and the stock price of Dominion Energy (D). Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our research team embarked on a quest to unravel the bewildering mystery surrounding this seemingly incongruous relationship. Our analysis spanned the years 2002 to 2022 and unearthed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9688613, with a significant level denoted by p < 0.01. The implications of this study not only spark curiosity but also shed light on the curious interplay between social phenomena and financial markets. Our findings, though perhaps shocking, present a compelling case for further investigation into the whimsical influence of names on stock dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

The enthralling world of stock markets often invokes images of stern-faced traders, attentive analysts, and intense discussions about price movements. What's often overlooked, however, is the potential impact of names – not just ticker symbols, mind you, but the monikers bestowed upon humans. In this study, we embark on a journey through the labyrinth of data, seeking to unravel the curious connection between the popularity of the first name Oliver and the electrifying stock performance of Dominion Energy.

While many may consider the correlation between personal names and stock prices to be a whimsical pursuit, our investigation reveals a shockingly robust relationship that defies conventional wisdom. As we delve into the world of finance, we cannot help but marvel at the unlikely coupling of human nomenclature and market dynamics. This venture might seem akin to chasing elusive lightning bolts, but it's one that promises to enlighten our understanding of the unseen forces shaping stock valuations.

The intersection of science and serendipity often leads to unexpected discoveries, and our exploration of the "Oliver Effect" is no exception. As we unravel the threads of this enigmatic association, we invite readers to join us in a quest that is as electrifying as the stock performance we seek to understand. After all, who would have thought that a mere name could hold such sway over the financial domain? Yet, as we shall demonstrate, the correlation is not merely statistical static – it crackles with significance, compelling us to peer deeper into the interwoven tapestry of human behavior and market dynamics.

So, buckle up, dear reader, as we navigate the currents of data and statistics, sifting through the buzz of market trends and the hum of human preferences. Our findings may appear shocking at first glance, but like any good science experiment, they promise to illuminate a hitherto unexplored facet of the capricious dance between names and numbers. Let's embark on this electrifying adventure with open minds and a healthy appreciation for the unexpected – for in the realm of research, as in life, the most electrifying revelations often come from the unlikeliest sources.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Oliver and Dominion Energy's stock price (D). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Oliver Effect: A Shocking Connection to Dominion Energy's Electrifying Stock Performance

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the captivating correlation between the popularity of the first name Oliver and the stock price of Dominion Energy (D). Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our research team embarked on a quest to unravel the bewildering mystery surrounding this seemingly incongruous relationship. Our analysis spanned the years 2002 to 2022 and unearthed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9688613, with a significant level denoted by p < 0.01. The implications of this study not only spark curiosity but also shed light on the curious interplay between social phenomena and financial markets. Our findings, though perhaps shocking, present a compelling case for further investigation into the whimsical influence of names on stock dynamics.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The enthralling world of stock markets often invokes images of stern-faced traders, attentive analysts, and intense discussions about price movements. What's often overlooked, however, is the potential impact of names – not just ticker symbols, mind you, but the monikers bestowed upon humans. In this study, we embark on a journey through the labyrinth of data, seeking to unravel the curious connection between the popularity of the first name Oliver and the electrifying stock performance of Dominion Energy.
While many may consider the correlation between personal names and stock prices to be a whimsical pursuit, our investigation reveals a shockingly robust relationship that defies conventional wisdom. As we delve into the world of finance, we cannot help but marvel at the unlikely coupling of human nomenclature and market dynamics. This venture might seem akin to chasing elusive lightning bolts, but it's one that promises to enlighten our understanding of the unseen forces shaping stock valuations.
The intersection of science and serendipity often leads to unexpected discoveries, and our exploration of the "Oliver Effect" is no exception. As we unravel the threads of this enigmatic association, we invite readers to join us in a quest that is as electrifying as the stock performance we seek to understand. After all, who would have thought that a mere name could hold such sway over the financial domain? Yet, as we shall demonstrate, the correlation is not merely statistical static – it crackles with significance, compelling us to peer deeper into the interwoven tapestry of human behavior and market dynamics.
So, buckle up, dear reader, as we navigate the currents of data and statistics, sifting through the buzz of market trends and the hum of human preferences. Our findings may appear shocking at first glance, but like any good science experiment, they promise to illuminate a hitherto unexplored facet of the capricious dance between names and numbers. Let's embark on this electrifying adventure with open minds and a healthy appreciation for the unexpected – for in the realm of research, as in life, the most electrifying revelations often come from the unlikeliest sources.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The concept of names and their potential influence on various aspects of life has long intrigued scholars and laypersons alike. Smith, Jones, and Doe (2015) delved into the social implications of first names, unveiling intricate relationships between nomenclature and societal dynamics. Similarly, the work of Williams and Brown (2017) shed light on the psychological impact of names, exploring their resonance in shaping individual identities and perceptions. As we venture into the realm of stock market dynamics, the intersection of human names and financial phenomena presents a peculiar avenue for investigation.

Turning to the domain of finance, a plethora of research has illuminated the multifaceted nature of stock market behaviors. The gripping insights offered by Nobel laureate Robert J. Shiller in "Irrational Exuberance" (2000) unmasked the psychological underpinnings of market fluctuations, providing a nuanced understanding of investor sentiments and their profound effects on stock prices. Furthermore, the quantitative rigor of Malkiel's "A Random Walk Down Wall Street" (2018) has become a cornerstone for comprehending the seemingly chaotic undulations of stock market movements.

Delving into the world of fiction, the captivating narratives of financial intrigue in Tom Wolfe's "The Bonfire of the Vanities" (1987) and the mesmerizing enchantment of magical realism found in Gabriel García Márquez's "One Hundred Years of Solitude" (1967) subtly hint at the intertwined nature of societal constructs and financial phenomena. Although fictional, these works infuse a sense of wonder and fascination, mirroring the enigmatic connection we strive to untangle.

Taking a whimsical turn, it is worth noting that even unconventional sources have sparked unexpected insights. The authors, in a display of unwavering dedication to rigorous research, scrutinized the back labels of countless shampoo bottles, entertaining the possibility of serendipitously stumbling upon encoded wisdom pertaining to the enigmatic "Oliver Effect." While yielding no tangible revelations, the endeavor did reinforce the notion that scholarly inquiry often takes unconventional and, at times, comically absurd paths.

As we navigate the vast intricacies of this research landscape, it becomes evident that the interplay of names and stock dynamics transcends the traditional boundaries of scholarly inquiry. The allure of the "Oliver Effect" beckons, its unconventional charm sparking curiosity and prompting further exploration into the interwoven tapestry of human nomenclature and the capricious dance of stock valuations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Oliver and Dominion Energy's stock price (D). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2002 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Oliver Effect: A Shocking Connection to Dominion Energy's Electrifying Stock Performance

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the captivating correlation between the popularity of the first name Oliver and the stock price of Dominion Energy (D). Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our research team embarked on a quest to unravel the bewildering mystery surrounding this seemingly incongruous relationship. Our analysis spanned the years 2002 to 2022 and unearthed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9688613, with a significant level denoted by p < 0.01. The implications of this study not only spark curiosity but also shed light on the curious interplay between social phenomena and financial markets. Our findings, though perhaps shocking, present a compelling case for further investigation into the whimsical influence of names on stock dynamics.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The enthralling world of stock markets often invokes images of stern-faced traders, attentive analysts, and intense discussions about price movements. What's often overlooked, however, is the potential impact of names – not just ticker symbols, mind you, but the monikers bestowed upon humans. In this study, we embark on a journey through the labyrinth of data, seeking to unravel the curious connection between the popularity of the first name Oliver and the electrifying stock performance of Dominion Energy.
While many may consider the correlation between personal names and stock prices to be a whimsical pursuit, our investigation reveals a shockingly robust relationship that defies conventional wisdom. As we delve into the world of finance, we cannot help but marvel at the unlikely coupling of human nomenclature and market dynamics. This venture might seem akin to chasing elusive lightning bolts, but it's one that promises to enlighten our understanding of the unseen forces shaping stock valuations.
The intersection of science and serendipity often leads to unexpected discoveries, and our exploration of the "Oliver Effect" is no exception. As we unravel the threads of this enigmatic association, we invite readers to join us in a quest that is as electrifying as the stock performance we seek to understand. After all, who would have thought that a mere name could hold such sway over the financial domain? Yet, as we shall demonstrate, the correlation is not merely statistical static – it crackles with significance, compelling us to peer deeper into the interwoven tapestry of human behavior and market dynamics.
So, buckle up, dear reader, as we navigate the currents of data and statistics, sifting through the buzz of market trends and the hum of human preferences. Our findings may appear shocking at first glance, but like any good science experiment, they promise to illuminate a hitherto unexplored facet of the capricious dance between names and numbers. Let's embark on this electrifying adventure with open minds and a healthy appreciation for the unexpected – for in the realm of research, as in life, the most electrifying revelations often come from the unlikeliest sources.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

METHODOLOGY

The enthralling quest to unravel the mysterious connection between the popularity of the first name Oliver and the stock performance of Dominion Energy commenced with a meticulous curation of data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv). Our research team engaged in what could only be described as a high-voltage pursuit, mining through records from the years 2002 to 2022 to unearth the currents of correlation.

To reveal the electrifying relationship between the name Oliver and Dominion Energy's stock price (D), we deployed a potent arsenal of statistical techniques. The unabashedly shocking correlation coefficient of 0.9688613 that emerged from our analysis left us feeling a bit thunderstruck, but also with a significant level denoted by p < 0.01.

For our investigation, we flexed our quantitative muscles, utilizing an assortment of tools, including time series analysis, regression modeling, and exploratory data analysis. The interplay between human nomenclature and financial markets was subjected to a vigorous interrogation, aptly tinged with a touch of electrical humor, to discern the underlying forces at play. Our approach, though quite electrifying in itself, adhered to the principles of scientific rigor, albeit with a spark of scholarly wit.

The data, though shockingly compelling, did not reveal its secrets without a jolt or two. The journey through the hallowed halls of statistics often felt like navigating a charged maze, with each variable and coefficient crackling with potential insights. At times, it seemed as though we were decoding the currents of an electrical storm, with each flicker of data offering a tantalizing glimpse into the sparking correlations that underpin this unusual connection.

The fusion of social phenomena and financial intricacies demanded a dance of data manipulation and interpretation that was nothing short of electrifying. In the pursuit of understanding the "Oliver Effect," our methodology embraced a balance of statistical rigor and playful curiosity, akin to a lighthearted game of cat and mouse with the elusive forces guiding stock valuations.

With an eye to transparency, we wielded the tools of hypothesis testing and sensitivity analysis to ensure that our findings resisted the charge of spurious correlation. The statistical safeguards we employed grounded our study in the solid bedrock of empirical inquiry, shielding it from the shocks and jolts of misinterpreted or misleading associations. After all, in the realm of research, one must always be wary of statistical thunder and the occasional lightning bolt of false inference.

The methodology, much like a circuit diagram of intricate design, guided our investigation through an electrifying journey of numeric fusion and analytical sparks. It not only demystified the process of uncovering the Oliver-Dominion Energy correlation but also grounded our findings in the resolute principles of scientific inquiry.

So, with data in hand and sparks flying, we ventured forth, one step closer to unraveling the tangled web of influence that the name Oliver exerts on the electrifying domain of stock prices. As we present our findings, we implore our readers to find both amusement and intellectual stimulation in our methodology, for in the throes of scientific pursuit, a bit of humor often helps keep the voltage steady.

As the great inventor Thomas Edison once said, "To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk." In our case, to uncover the Oliver Effect, we needed a good imagination and a pile of data – but we assure you, dear reader, there was no junk in sight.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Oliver and Dominion Energy's stock price (D). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .

For the time period 2002 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9688613, r-squared of 0.9386922, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Oliver Effect: A Shocking Connection to Dominion Energy's Electrifying Stock Performance

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the captivating correlation between the popularity of the first name Oliver and the stock price of Dominion Energy (D). Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our research team embarked on a quest to unravel the bewildering mystery surrounding this seemingly incongruous relationship. Our analysis spanned the years 2002 to 2022 and unearthed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9688613, with a significant level denoted by p < 0.01. The implications of this study not only spark curiosity but also shed light on the curious interplay between social phenomena and financial markets. Our findings, though perhaps shocking, present a compelling case for further investigation into the whimsical influence of names on stock dynamics.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
The enthralling world of stock markets often invokes images of stern-faced traders, attentive analysts, and intense discussions about price movements. What's often overlooked, however, is the potential impact of names – not just ticker symbols, mind you, but the monikers bestowed upon humans. In this study, we embark on a journey through the labyrinth of data, seeking to unravel the curious connection between the popularity of the first name Oliver and the electrifying stock performance of Dominion Energy.
While many may consider the correlation between personal names and stock prices to be a whimsical pursuit, our investigation reveals a shockingly robust relationship that defies conventional wisdom. As we delve into the world of finance, we cannot help but marvel at the unlikely coupling of human nomenclature and market dynamics. This venture might seem akin to chasing elusive lightning bolts, but it's one that promises to enlighten our understanding of the unseen forces shaping stock valuations.
The intersection of science and serendipity often leads to unexpected discoveries, and our exploration of the "Oliver Effect" is no exception. As we unravel the threads of this enigmatic association, we invite readers to join us in a quest that is as electrifying as the stock performance we seek to understand. After all, who would have thought that a mere name could hold such sway over the financial domain? Yet, as we shall demonstrate, the correlation is not merely statistical static – it crackles with significance, compelling us to peer deeper into the interwoven tapestry of human behavior and market dynamics.
So, buckle up, dear reader, as we navigate the currents of data and statistics, sifting through the buzz of market trends and the hum of human preferences. Our findings may appear shocking at first glance, but like any good science experiment, they promise to illuminate a hitherto unexplored facet of the capricious dance between names and numbers. Let's embark on this electrifying adventure with open minds and a healthy appreciation for the unexpected – for in the realm of research, as in life, the most electrifying revelations often come from the unlikeliest sources.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our expedition through the murky depths of data has unearthed an electrifying revelation – the mind-boggling correlation between the popularity of the first name Oliver and the stock price of Dominion Energy (D). Our analysis covered the years 2002 to 2022, capturing the undulating waves of name trends and stock performance with meticulous precision.

The statistical analysis yielded a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9688613, underscoring the robust link between the name Oliver's prominence and the fluctuations in Dominion Energy's stock price. Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9386922 corroborates the strikingly strong relationship between these seemingly disparate variables, leaving us dumbfounded by the depths of this correlation.

To hammer home the significance of our findings, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides resounding support for the hypothesis that there exists, quite shockingly, a profound connection between the popularity of the name Oliver and the stock price of Dominion Energy.

Without further ado, we present our pièce de résistance – the illustrious Fig. 1, gracing the pages with its presence. Behold the scatterplot, a visual testament to the potent correlation we've uncovered. The plot depicts the undeniable co-movement of these two variables, visually exemplifying the mesmerizing dance between the name Oliver's prominence and Dominion Energy's stock price.

Intriguingly, our findings not only challenge conventional wisdom but also beckon researchers and market enthusiasts alike to contemplate the whimsical influence of names on stock dynamics. The implications of this study are not merely significant; they are positively electrifying, inviting us to ponder the boundless quirks of human behavior and its unfathomable reach into the intricate mechanisms of financial markets.

In conclusion, the spectacle of the Oliver Effect doesn't merely offer sound statistical evidence but also renders the obscure relationship between personal nomenclature and stock performance shockingly lucid. Our findings present a captivating case for further exploration, imbued with a healthy dose of wonder and a pinch of skepticism – for in the realm of research, as in the markets, the most electrifying revelations often stem from the unlikeliest sources.

But hey, who would have thought that the name Oliver could hold such sway over stock valuations? Just when you thought you had seen it all, the data unleashes yet another thunderbolt of intrigue, sparking new avenues of inquiry and reaffirming the enthralling nexus of names and numbers.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Oliver and Dominion Energy's stock price (D). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Oliver Effect: A Shocking Connection to Dominion Energy's Electrifying Stock Performance

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the captivating correlation between the popularity of the first name Oliver and the stock price of Dominion Energy (D). Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our research team embarked on a quest to unravel the bewildering mystery surrounding this seemingly incongruous relationship. Our analysis spanned the years 2002 to 2022 and unearthed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9688613, with a significant level denoted by p < 0.01. The implications of this study not only spark curiosity but also shed light on the curious interplay between social phenomena and financial markets. Our findings, though perhaps shocking, present a compelling case for further investigation into the whimsical influence of names on stock dynamics.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The concept of names and their potential influence on various aspects of life has long intrigued scholars and laypersons alike. Smith, Jones, and Doe (2015) delved into the social implications of first names, unveiling intricate relationships between nomenclature and societal dynamics. Similarly, the work of Williams and Brown (2017) shed light on the psychological impact of names, exploring their resonance in shaping individual identities and perceptions. As we venture into the realm of stock market dynamics, the intersection of human names and financial phenomena presents a peculiar avenue for investigation.
Turning to the domain of finance, a plethora of research has illuminated the multifaceted nature of stock market behaviors. The gripping insights offered by Nobel laureate Robert J. Shiller in "Irrational Exuberance" (2000) unmasked the psychological underpinnings of market fluctuations, providing a nuanced understanding of investor sentiments and their profound effects on stock prices. Furthermore, the quantitative rigor of Malkiel's "A Random Walk Down Wall Street" (2018) has become a cornerstone for comprehending the seemingly chaotic undulations of stock market movements.
Delving into the world of fiction, the captivating narratives of financial intrigue in Tom Wolfe's "The Bonfire of the Vanities" (1987) and the mesmerizing enchantment of magical realism found in Gabriel García Márquez's "One Hundred Years of Solitude" (1967) subtly hint at the intertwined nature of societal constructs and financial phenomena. Although fictional, these works infuse a sense of wonder and fascination, mirroring the enigmatic connection we strive to untangle.
Taking a whimsical turn, it is worth noting that even unconventional sources have sparked unexpected insights. The authors, in a display of unwavering dedication to rigorous research, scrutinized the back labels of countless shampoo bottles, entertaining the possibility of serendipitously stumbling upon encoded wisdom pertaining to the enigmatic "Oliver Effect." While yielding no tangible revelations, the endeavor did reinforce the notion that scholarly inquiry often takes unconventional and, at times, comically absurd paths.
As we navigate the vast intricacies of this research landscape, it becomes evident that the interplay of names and stock dynamics transcends the traditional boundaries of scholarly inquiry. The allure of the "Oliver Effect" beckons, its unconventional charm sparking curiosity and prompting further exploration into the interwoven tapestry of human nomenclature and the capricious dance of stock valuations.

[[RESULTS]]
Our expedition through the murky depths of data has unearthed an electrifying revelation – the mind-boggling correlation between the popularity of the first name Oliver and the stock price of Dominion Energy (D). Our analysis covered the years 2002 to 2022, capturing the undulating waves of name trends and stock performance with meticulous precision.
The statistical analysis yielded a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9688613, underscoring the robust link between the name Oliver's prominence and the fluctuations in Dominion Energy's stock price. Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9386922 corroborates the strikingly strong relationship between these seemingly disparate variables, leaving us dumbfounded by the depths of this correlation.
To hammer home the significance of our findings, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides resounding support for the hypothesis that there exists, quite shockingly, a profound connection between the popularity of the name Oliver and the stock price of Dominion Energy.
Without further ado, we present our pièce de résistance – the illustrious Fig. 1, gracing the pages with its presence. Behold the scatterplot, a visual testament to the potent correlation we've uncovered. The plot depicts the undeniable co-movement of these two variables, visually exemplifying the mesmerizing dance between the name Oliver's prominence and Dominion Energy's stock price.
Intriguingly, our findings not only challenge conventional wisdom but also beckon researchers and market enthusiasts alike to contemplate the whimsical influence of names on stock dynamics. The implications of this study are not merely significant; they are positively electrifying, inviting us to ponder the boundless quirks of human behavior and its unfathomable reach into the intricate mechanisms of financial markets.
In conclusion, the spectacle of the Oliver Effect doesn't merely offer sound statistical evidence but also renders the obscure relationship between personal nomenclature and stock performance shockingly lucid. Our findings present a captivating case for further exploration, imbued with a healthy dose of wonder and a pinch of skepticism – for in the realm of research, as in the markets, the most electrifying revelations often stem from the unlikeliest sources.
But hey, who would have thought that the name Oliver could hold such sway over stock valuations? Just when you thought you had seen it all, the data unleashes yet another thunderbolt of intrigue, sparking new avenues of inquiry and reaffirming the enthralling nexus of names and numbers.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The shockingly robust correlation between the popularity of the first name Oliver and the stock price of Dominion Energy (D) that we unveiled in our study has opened a Pandora's box of contemplation. Our results not only substantiate the earlier fascinations displayed in the literature review, but also magnify the peculiar allure of the "Oliver Effect."

The whimsical pronouncements by Smith, Jones, and Doe (2015) and Williams and Brown (2017) on the potential influence of names on societal dynamics and individual identities now seem eerily prescient in light of our findings. As financial researchers, we are compelled to consider the captivating notion that personal nomenclature could extend its influence onto the capricious fluctuations of stock valuations. The inexplicable charm of the "Oliver Effect" transcends the conventional boundaries of statistical inquiry, prompting us to tread the hallowed ground between numbers and nomenclature with renewed vigor and curiosity.

Our discoveries not only echo the intriguing insights of Nobel laureate Shiller and Malkiel's "random walk," but they also unfurl a startling new chapter in the grand saga of market fluctuations. As we stand agape at the resounding support provided by our statistical analyses, we are reminded of the capricious nature of the markets and the unquestionably enigmatic influence of human behavior on stock dynamics.

One cannot help but wonder, as we did when scrutinizing the back labels of shampoo bottles with dogged determination, whether the all-encompassing "Oliver Effect" might embody hidden wisdom akin to the elusive secrets of magical realism found in García Márquez's works. The playfulness of our academic endeavors might lead to bewildering discoveries, but as our results reveal, the jest is shockingly on us – there is a confluence between the popularity of the name Oliver and the electrifying undulations of Dominion Energy's stock prices.

In this enigmatic dance of names and numbers, we find ourselves intrigued and amused, with a hint of skepticism as we contemplate the profound implications of our findings. The theater of research has once again presented an electrifying revelation, inviting us to marvel at the interplay of names and financial markets and reaffirming the captivating nexus of whimsy and empirical inquiry. Who would have thought that the whimsy of nomenclature could hold sway over the capricious waves of stock valuations? It seems that, in the realm of names and numbers, the most electrifying revelations often emerge from the unlikeliest sources, sending ripples through the seemingly sober world of academic inquiry and stock market dynamics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Oliver and Dominion Energy's stock price (D). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Oliver Effect: A Shocking Connection to Dominion Energy's Electrifying Stock Performance

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the captivating correlation between the popularity of the first name Oliver and the stock price of Dominion Energy (D). Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our research team embarked on a quest to unravel the bewildering mystery surrounding this seemingly incongruous relationship. Our analysis spanned the years 2002 to 2022 and unearthed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9688613, with a significant level denoted by p < 0.01. The implications of this study not only spark curiosity but also shed light on the curious interplay between social phenomena and financial markets. Our findings, though perhaps shocking, present a compelling case for further investigation into the whimsical influence of names on stock dynamics.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The enthralling world of stock markets often invokes images of stern-faced traders, attentive analysts, and intense discussions about price movements. What's often overlooked, however, is the potential impact of names – not just ticker symbols, mind you, but the monikers bestowed upon humans. In this study, we embark on a journey through the labyrinth of data, seeking to unravel the curious connection between the popularity of the first name Oliver and the electrifying stock performance of Dominion Energy.
While many may consider the correlation between personal names and stock prices to be a whimsical pursuit, our investigation reveals a shockingly robust relationship that defies conventional wisdom. As we delve into the world of finance, we cannot help but marvel at the unlikely coupling of human nomenclature and market dynamics. This venture might seem akin to chasing elusive lightning bolts, but it's one that promises to enlighten our understanding of the unseen forces shaping stock valuations.
The intersection of science and serendipity often leads to unexpected discoveries, and our exploration of the "Oliver Effect" is no exception. As we unravel the threads of this enigmatic association, we invite readers to join us in a quest that is as electrifying as the stock performance we seek to understand. After all, who would have thought that a mere name could hold such sway over the financial domain? Yet, as we shall demonstrate, the correlation is not merely statistical static – it crackles with significance, compelling us to peer deeper into the interwoven tapestry of human behavior and market dynamics.
So, buckle up, dear reader, as we navigate the currents of data and statistics, sifting through the buzz of market trends and the hum of human preferences. Our findings may appear shocking at first glance, but like any good science experiment, they promise to illuminate a hitherto unexplored facet of the capricious dance between names and numbers. Let's embark on this electrifying adventure with open minds and a healthy appreciation for the unexpected – for in the realm of research, as in life, the most electrifying revelations often come from the unlikeliest sources.

[[RESULTS]]
Our expedition through the murky depths of data has unearthed an electrifying revelation – the mind-boggling correlation between the popularity of the first name Oliver and the stock price of Dominion Energy (D). Our analysis covered the years 2002 to 2022, capturing the undulating waves of name trends and stock performance with meticulous precision.
The statistical analysis yielded a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9688613, underscoring the robust link between the name Oliver's prominence and the fluctuations in Dominion Energy's stock price. Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9386922 corroborates the strikingly strong relationship between these seemingly disparate variables, leaving us dumbfounded by the depths of this correlation.
To hammer home the significance of our findings, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides resounding support for the hypothesis that there exists, quite shockingly, a profound connection between the popularity of the name Oliver and the stock price of Dominion Energy.
Without further ado, we present our pièce de résistance – the illustrious Fig. 1, gracing the pages with its presence. Behold the scatterplot, a visual testament to the potent correlation we've uncovered. The plot depicts the undeniable co-movement of these two variables, visually exemplifying the mesmerizing dance between the name Oliver's prominence and Dominion Energy's stock price.
Intriguingly, our findings not only challenge conventional wisdom but also beckon researchers and market enthusiasts alike to contemplate the whimsical influence of names on stock dynamics. The implications of this study are not merely significant; they are positively electrifying, inviting us to ponder the boundless quirks of human behavior and its unfathomable reach into the intricate mechanisms of financial markets.
In conclusion, the spectacle of the Oliver Effect doesn't merely offer sound statistical evidence but also renders the obscure relationship between personal nomenclature and stock performance shockingly lucid. Our findings present a captivating case for further exploration, imbued with a healthy dose of wonder and a pinch of skepticism – for in the realm of research, as in the markets, the most electrifying revelations often stem from the unlikeliest sources.
But hey, who would have thought that the name Oliver could hold such sway over stock valuations? Just when you thought you had seen it all, the data unleashes yet another thunderbolt of intrigue, sparking new avenues of inquiry and reaffirming the enthralling nexus of names and numbers.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In the grand tapestry of financial markets and human idiosyncrasies, our study has illuminated a shockingly robust correlation between the prevalence of the endearing name Oliver and the electrifying stock performance of Dominion Energy (D). The uncovering of a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9688613, coupled with a significant p-value of less than 0.01, has left us feeling positively charged with amazement. The r-squared value of 0.9386922 serves as a testament to the magnetic pull of the Oliver Effect on Dominion Energy's stock price.

As we wrap up this enlightening journey, it becomes apparent that the whimsical influence of names on stock dynamics is not simply a statical curiosity but rather a positively electrifying revelation. Our findings beckon researchers and market enthusiasts to ponder the dance between personal nomenclature and financial valuations, with a healthy dose of wonder and a pinch of skepticism. Despite the shocking nature of our discoveries, we stand firm in asserting that no further research is warranted in this area. The Oliver Effect, it seems, is a thunderbolt of intrigue best left unraveled through the passage of time.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Oliver Effect: A Shocking Connection to Dominion Energy's Electrifying Stock Performance. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Energy Dynamics and Financial Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Oliver Effect: A Shocking Connection to Dominion Energy's Electrifying Stock Performance. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Consortium for Applied Energy Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Oliver Effect: A Shocking Connection to Dominion Energy's Electrifying Stock Performance with an abstract of This study delves into the captivating correlation between the popularity of the first name Oliver and the stock price of Dominion Energy (D). Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), our research team embarked on a quest to unravel the bewildering mystery surrounding this seemingly incongruous relationship. Our analysis spanned the years 2002 to 2022 and unearthed a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9688613, with a significant level denoted by p < 0.01. The implications of this study not only spark curiosity but also shed light on the curious interplay between social phenomena and financial markets. Our findings, though perhaps shocking, present a compelling case for further investigation into the whimsical influence of names on stock dynamics.

ChatGPT:

Oliver, Dominion Energy, Stock performance, Social Security Administration data, LSEG Analytics, Refinitiv, Correlation coefficient, Financial markets, Name influence, Stock dynamics

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Oliver
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Oliver
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Oliver

Dominion Energy's stock price (D)
Detailed data title: Opening price of Dominion Energy (D) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function

See what else correlates with Dominion Energy's stock price (D)

Correlation r = 0.9688613 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9386922 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 93.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Dominion Energy's stock price (D)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Oliver) over the 21 years from 2002 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.6E-13. 0.0000000000005631829833464651
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 5.6E-11% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,775,621,830,862 random variables You don't actually need 1 trillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 20 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 20 because we have two variables measured over a period of 21 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.92, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Oliver (Babies born)11711379149717932351291736134294467154215930728794581168313076132351350613975142841470915104
Dominion Energy's stock price (D) (Stock price)3027.5431.943438.8141.8547.335.9339.142.9353.4752.3664.6177.2666.9776.5781.271.482.8875.0678.66




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1171,1379,1497,1793,2351,2917,3613,4294,4671,5421,5930,7287,9458,11683,13076,13235,13506,13975,14284,14709,15104,])
array_2 = np.array([30,27.54,31.94,34,38.81,41.85,47.3,35.93,39.1,42.93,53.47,52.36,64.61,77.26,66.97,76.57,81.2,71.4,82.88,75.06,78.66,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Oliver"
array_2_name = "Dominion Energy's stock price (D)"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is stellar!


Correlation ID: 1344 · Black Variable ID: 2770 · Red Variable ID: 1775
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0