Report an error
Popularity of the first name Oliver correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Annual US household spending on health insurance | r=1 | 23yrs | No |
| Electricity generation in Burkina Faso | r=0.99 | 42yrs | No |
| Renewable energy production in China | r=0.99 | 42yrs | No |
| Electricity generation in Vietnam | r=0.99 | 42yrs | No |
| Renewable energy production in Belgium | r=0.99 | 42yrs | No |
| Dominion Energy's stock price (D) | r=0.97 | 21yrs | Yes! |
| The average number of likes on The Game Theorists YouTube videos | r=0.96 | 14yrs | No |
| Annual Revenue of the Lego Group | r=0.95 | 20yrs | No |
| The number of accountants and auditors in California | r=0.94 | 20yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'i have a headache' | r=0.93 | 19yrs | No |
| The price of gold | r=0.91 | 40yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Oliver also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)