about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,297 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and the second variable is Google searches for 'tummy ache'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The corn just couldn't stomach all those genetic modifications, leading to a-MAIZE-ing digestive distress. It seems the GMOs were causing some cornfusion in the stomachs of Ohioans, creating a real kernel of discomfort.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Sure! Here's an enhanced image generation prompt for DALL-E 3 based on your request: Style: Cute cartoon Scene: In a vibrant field of tall, swaying corn stalks under a clear, blue sky, a few of the corn stalks sport big, goofy smiles that make them stand out. People walking through the field look puzzled and hold their tummies, while the mischievous, smiling corn gives a playful wink and a wave. Nearby, in homes, people are reaching for bottles of stomach remedies with quizzical expressions on their faces. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: Genetically modified corn in Ohio caused more tummy aches because it's like the corn was saying, "Oh, hi, I'm gonna mess with your tummy!" The GMO corn thought it was being "corny" and wanted to be the "stalk" of the town, so it provoked tummy aches as a "maize"ing prank. The GMO corn's silly antics led to people feeling "corn-fused" and reaching for the stomach remedies.. Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Cybernetic art Cute cartoon Glitch art Concept art
ChatGPT: Cute cartoon

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. Genetically modified corn in Ohio caused more tummy aches because it's like the corn was saying, "Oh, hi, I'm gonna mess with your tummy!" The GMO corn thought it was being "corny" and wanted to be the "stalk" of the town, so it provoked tummy aches as a "maize"ing prank. The GMO corn's silly antics led to people feeling "corn-fused" and reaching for the stomach remedies.
ChatGPT: Imagine a field of tall, green corn stalks swaying in the breeze under a bright blue Ohio sky. Among the regular corn, a few of the stalks have big, goofy smiles painted on them, making them stand out. People walking through the field look puzzled and hold their tummies, while the mischievous, smiling corn gives a playful wink and a wave. Within homes nearby, people are seen reaching for bottles of stomach remedies with quizzical expressions on their faces.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cute cartoon ] and depicting this scene: Imagine a field of tall, green corn stalks swaying in the breeze under a bright blue Ohio sky. Among the regular corn, a few of the stalks have big, goofy smiles painted on them, making them stand out. People walking through the field look puzzled and hold their tummies, while the mischievous, smiling corn gives a playful wink and a wave. Within homes nearby, people are seen reaching for bottles of stomach remedies with quizzical expressions on their faces. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Sure! Here's an enhanced image generation prompt for DALL-E 3 based on your request: Style: Cute cartoon Scene: In a vibrant field of tall, swaying corn stalks under a clear, blue sky, a few of the corn stalks sport big, goofy smiles that make them stand out. People walking through the field look puzzled and hold their tummies, while the mischievous, smiling corn gives a playful wink and a wave. Nearby, in homes, people are reaching for bottles of stomach remedies with quizzical expressions on their faces.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in corn grown in Ohio caused tummy ache (Google searches for 'tummy ache') to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Maize Genetics: A Corny Connection Between GMOs and Google Searches for 'Tummy Ache'

The Journal of Agri-Humor Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and Google searches for 'tummy ache'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from USDA and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9508392 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Maize Genetics: A Corny Connection Between GMOs and Google Searches for 'Tummy Ache'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the realm of corn genetics and its impact on the popular topic of stomach discomfort, as evidenced by Google searches for "tummy ache." While some might consider this research a-corn-y, we take it seriously. Using data from the USDA and Google Trends, we conducted a thorough analysis spanning from 2004 to 2023 to unearth the potential link between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and public interest in stomach-related ailments. To our surprise, a correlation coefficient of 0.9508392 and a p-value of less than 0.01 manifested, indicating a statistically significant association. So, the next time you have a tummy ache after consuming GMO corn, it might not just be a kernel of truth – it could be a real stomach-churner.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and Google searches for 'tummy ache'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Maize Genetics: A Corny Connection Between GMOs and Google Searches for 'Tummy Ache'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the realm of corn genetics and its impact on the popular topic of stomach discomfort, as evidenced by Google searches for "tummy ache." While some might consider this research a-corn-y, we take it seriously. Using data from the USDA and Google Trends, we conducted a thorough analysis spanning from 2004 to 2023 to unearth the potential link between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and public interest in stomach-related ailments. To our surprise, a correlation coefficient of 0.9508392 and a p-value of less than 0.01 manifested, indicating a statistically significant association. So, the next time you have a tummy ache after consuming GMO corn, it might not just be a kernel of truth – it could be a real stomach-churner.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The world of genetics is a fascinating one, full of twists, turns, and the occasional kernel of truth. In this study, we set out to explore the relationship between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Ohio and the frequency of Google searches for the colloquial phrase "tummy ache." While this topic may initially seem as far-fetched as finding a needle in a haystack, we were determined to separate the corn from the chaff and uncover any possible connections.

Corn, known scientifically as Zea mays, has been a staple crop in the United States for centuries. First domesticated by indigenous peoples in Central America, it has since become a ubiquitous presence in the agricultural landscapes of the Midwest, including the great state of Ohio. However, the introduction of genetically modified corn in the late 20th century brought with it a bushel of controversy. Critics of GMOs have raised concerns about their potential impact on human health, while proponents argue for their benefits in increasing crop yields and reducing the need for chemical pesticides. This ongoing debate has left the public in a bit of a maize, so to speak, regarding the potential effects of GMO corn consumption.

At the same time, the phenomenon of using Google searches as a proxy for public health concerns has blossomed faster than an untended field of corn in the summer. With the wealth of information available at our fingertips, it seems that more and more people are turning to the internet to diagnose their ailments, often leading to a virtual maze of self-diagnosis and, at times, a-maize-ing revelations.

Given the prevalence of GMOs in corn production and the widespread use of internet search engines to seek out health-related information, we believed it was high time to dig in and discover whether there might be a stomach-churning correlation between the two. So, brace yourself for a journey through the tangled stalks of maize genetics and the twisty pathways of online search trends. It's not just a-maize-ing – it's a-maize-ingly relevant.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and Google searches for 'tummy ache'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Maize Genetics: A Corny Connection Between GMOs and Google Searches for 'Tummy Ache'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the realm of corn genetics and its impact on the popular topic of stomach discomfort, as evidenced by Google searches for "tummy ache." While some might consider this research a-corn-y, we take it seriously. Using data from the USDA and Google Trends, we conducted a thorough analysis spanning from 2004 to 2023 to unearth the potential link between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and public interest in stomach-related ailments. To our surprise, a correlation coefficient of 0.9508392 and a p-value of less than 0.01 manifested, indicating a statistically significant association. So, the next time you have a tummy ache after consuming GMO corn, it might not just be a kernel of truth – it could be a real stomach-churner.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of genetics is a fascinating one, full of twists, turns, and the occasional kernel of truth. In this study, we set out to explore the relationship between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Ohio and the frequency of Google searches for the colloquial phrase "tummy ache." While this topic may initially seem as far-fetched as finding a needle in a haystack, we were determined to separate the corn from the chaff and uncover any possible connections.
Corn, known scientifically as Zea mays, has been a staple crop in the United States for centuries. First domesticated by indigenous peoples in Central America, it has since become a ubiquitous presence in the agricultural landscapes of the Midwest, including the great state of Ohio. However, the introduction of genetically modified corn in the late 20th century brought with it a bushel of controversy. Critics of GMOs have raised concerns about their potential impact on human health, while proponents argue for their benefits in increasing crop yields and reducing the need for chemical pesticides. This ongoing debate has left the public in a bit of a maize, so to speak, regarding the potential effects of GMO corn consumption.
At the same time, the phenomenon of using Google searches as a proxy for public health concerns has blossomed faster than an untended field of corn in the summer. With the wealth of information available at our fingertips, it seems that more and more people are turning to the internet to diagnose their ailments, often leading to a virtual maze of self-diagnosis and, at times, a-maize-ing revelations.
Given the prevalence of GMOs in corn production and the widespread use of internet search engines to seek out health-related information, we believed it was high time to dig in and discover whether there might be a stomach-churning correlation between the two. So, brace yourself for a journey through the tangled stalks of maize genetics and the twisty pathways of online search trends. It's not just a-maize-ing – it's a-maize-ingly relevant.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In the realm of agricultural genetics, the impact of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) on human health has been a topic of prolific research and lively debate. Smith et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of existing studies on the safety of GMO consumption, concluding that there is currently no substantial evidence to suggest adverse effects on human health. On the other hand, Doe and Jones (2018) presented a longitudinal study examining the potential long-term consequences of GMO consumption, raising concerns about its impact on gastrointestinal function.

As we pivot to the corn-centric context of our investigation, it is essential to acknowledge the groundbreaking work of "GMOs and You: A Digestible Guide" by Dr. Amy Cornwell, which provides a comprehensive overview of the science and controversies surrounding genetically modified crops. Furthermore, "The Corn Conundrum: A Kernel of Truth" by Dr. Harold Maize sheds light on the historical, cultural, and scientific dimensions of corn cultivation, offering a-maize-ing insights.

Turning to more fictional contributions, "Children of the Corn" by Stephen King presents a chilling narrative set amidst the vast cornfields of Nebraska, offering a gripping tale of supernatural horrors and unsettling mysteries. Similarly, "The Corn Identity" by Robert Ludlum introduces a thrilling espionage plot with a protagonist entangled in a web of intrigue and corn-related conspiracies.

In the realm of cinema, our scholarly pursuits led us to movies such as "Field of Dreams," where the intersection of cornfields and unfulfilled desires takes center stage. Additionally, "The Wizard of Oz" merits attention for its iconic yellow brick road, which wouldn't be complete without the presence of a certain maize-related element.

While these references may seem like a-maize-ing diversions, they serve to exemplify the diverse cultural and literary landscape in which corn has been featured. Our study seeks to navigate through this amalgamation of real and fictional representations to shed light on the very real connection between GMO corn and public interest in gastrointestinal discomfort, as indicated by Google searches for 'tummy ache'. Let's dive deep into the kernel of this research and see what pops up.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and Google searches for 'tummy ache'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Maize Genetics: A Corny Connection Between GMOs and Google Searches for 'Tummy Ache'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the realm of corn genetics and its impact on the popular topic of stomach discomfort, as evidenced by Google searches for "tummy ache." While some might consider this research a-corn-y, we take it seriously. Using data from the USDA and Google Trends, we conducted a thorough analysis spanning from 2004 to 2023 to unearth the potential link between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and public interest in stomach-related ailments. To our surprise, a correlation coefficient of 0.9508392 and a p-value of less than 0.01 manifested, indicating a statistically significant association. So, the next time you have a tummy ache after consuming GMO corn, it might not just be a kernel of truth – it could be a real stomach-churner.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of genetics is a fascinating one, full of twists, turns, and the occasional kernel of truth. In this study, we set out to explore the relationship between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Ohio and the frequency of Google searches for the colloquial phrase "tummy ache." While this topic may initially seem as far-fetched as finding a needle in a haystack, we were determined to separate the corn from the chaff and uncover any possible connections.
Corn, known scientifically as Zea mays, has been a staple crop in the United States for centuries. First domesticated by indigenous peoples in Central America, it has since become a ubiquitous presence in the agricultural landscapes of the Midwest, including the great state of Ohio. However, the introduction of genetically modified corn in the late 20th century brought with it a bushel of controversy. Critics of GMOs have raised concerns about their potential impact on human health, while proponents argue for their benefits in increasing crop yields and reducing the need for chemical pesticides. This ongoing debate has left the public in a bit of a maize, so to speak, regarding the potential effects of GMO corn consumption.
At the same time, the phenomenon of using Google searches as a proxy for public health concerns has blossomed faster than an untended field of corn in the summer. With the wealth of information available at our fingertips, it seems that more and more people are turning to the internet to diagnose their ailments, often leading to a virtual maze of self-diagnosis and, at times, a-maize-ing revelations.
Given the prevalence of GMOs in corn production and the widespread use of internet search engines to seek out health-related information, we believed it was high time to dig in and discover whether there might be a stomach-churning correlation between the two. So, brace yourself for a journey through the tangled stalks of maize genetics and the twisty pathways of online search trends. It's not just a-maize-ing – it's a-maize-ingly relevant.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To address the pressing question of whether GMO use in corn grown in Ohio is associated with increased Google searches for "tummy ache," we employed a multi-faceted and multi-grain approach. Our methodology combined data gathering, statistical analysis, and a dash of whimsy to navigate the complex terrain of maize genetics and internet search behavior.

Data Collection:
We acquired data on GMO corn cultivation in Ohio from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). This involved sifting through a proverbial mountain of data, akin to separating the kernels from the cob, to pinpoint the prevalence of GMO corn cultivation in the state from 2004 to 2023. Meanwhile, information on Google search trends for "tummy ache" was obtained from the Google Trends platform. Our team of researchers meticulously combed through this data, navigating its ebb and flow like a river winding through a cornfield, to uncover patterns and trends over the same time period.

Statistical Analysis:
With our data in hand, we set out to disentangle the potential relationship between GMO corn cultivation and Google searches for stomach-related discomfort. Utilizing the power of statistical software, we performed a rigorous correlation analysis, treating the data with the care and attention one would give to shucking an ear of corn. We calculated correlation coefficients, p-values, and confidence intervals with the precision of a skilled agronomist evaluating crop yields. Our goal was to unearth any statistically significant associations that might shed light on the entwined paths of GMO corn and tummy ache searches.

Control Variables:
To ensure the robustness of our findings, we took into account a range of variables that could influence the relationship between GMO corn and online searches for stomach ailments. These included factors such as overall internet usage, changes in health awareness, and fluctuations in the popularity of corn-related recipes that could cause a kernel of confusion in our analysis.

Expert Consultation:
In our quest to leave no kernel unturned, we consulted with experts in the fields of genetics, agricultural science, and digital trends. These consultations provided valuable insights and perspectives, helping us to navigate the labyrinth of GMO impacts and internet search behavior with the wisdom of those who have traversed many a corn maze.

Sensitivity Analysis:
Recognizing the potential for variability in our data, we conducted sensitivity analyses to explore the robustness of our results. We charted our way through different time frames and geographic regions, testing the resilience of our findings like a farmer assessing the sturdiness of a corn stalk in a summer storm.

Ethical Considerations:
In the spirit of academic integrity and ethical research practices, we upheld the highest standards of transparency and honesty in our data analysis. We remained mindful of the potential implications of our findings on public perceptions of GMOs and health, ensuring that our exploration of maize genetics and stomach-related online queries remained grounded in academic rigor.

In summary, our methodology involved a rigorous and comprehensive approach to untangle the potential connection between GMO use in Ohio-grown corn and the frequency of internet searches for stomach discomfort. By employing a blend of data analysis, statistical rigor, and expert consultation, we aimed to navigate the convoluted pathways of maize genetics and online search behavior to reveal any tantalizing correlations. So, buckle up for a journey through the stalks and searches – it's not just research, it's a-maize-ing.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and Google searches for 'tummy ache'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.9508392, r-squared of 0.9040951, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Maize Genetics: A Corny Connection Between GMOs and Google Searches for 'Tummy Ache'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the realm of corn genetics and its impact on the popular topic of stomach discomfort, as evidenced by Google searches for "tummy ache." While some might consider this research a-corn-y, we take it seriously. Using data from the USDA and Google Trends, we conducted a thorough analysis spanning from 2004 to 2023 to unearth the potential link between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and public interest in stomach-related ailments. To our surprise, a correlation coefficient of 0.9508392 and a p-value of less than 0.01 manifested, indicating a statistically significant association. So, the next time you have a tummy ache after consuming GMO corn, it might not just be a kernel of truth – it could be a real stomach-churner.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of genetics is a fascinating one, full of twists, turns, and the occasional kernel of truth. In this study, we set out to explore the relationship between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Ohio and the frequency of Google searches for the colloquial phrase "tummy ache." While this topic may initially seem as far-fetched as finding a needle in a haystack, we were determined to separate the corn from the chaff and uncover any possible connections.
Corn, known scientifically as Zea mays, has been a staple crop in the United States for centuries. First domesticated by indigenous peoples in Central America, it has since become a ubiquitous presence in the agricultural landscapes of the Midwest, including the great state of Ohio. However, the introduction of genetically modified corn in the late 20th century brought with it a bushel of controversy. Critics of GMOs have raised concerns about their potential impact on human health, while proponents argue for their benefits in increasing crop yields and reducing the need for chemical pesticides. This ongoing debate has left the public in a bit of a maize, so to speak, regarding the potential effects of GMO corn consumption.
At the same time, the phenomenon of using Google searches as a proxy for public health concerns has blossomed faster than an untended field of corn in the summer. With the wealth of information available at our fingertips, it seems that more and more people are turning to the internet to diagnose their ailments, often leading to a virtual maze of self-diagnosis and, at times, a-maize-ing revelations.
Given the prevalence of GMOs in corn production and the widespread use of internet search engines to seek out health-related information, we believed it was high time to dig in and discover whether there might be a stomach-churning correlation between the two. So, brace yourself for a journey through the tangled stalks of maize genetics and the twisty pathways of online search trends. It's not just a-maize-ing – it's a-maize-ingly relevant.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

After painstakingly harvesting data from the USDA and Google Trends, we unearthed some corny, yet compelling results. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9508392, with an r-squared value of 0.9040951, and a p-value of less than 0.01. It seems the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and public interest in tummy-related troubles is not just a husk.

Figure 1 displays the scatterplot that unequivocally illustrates the robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The data points form a pattern so clear, you'd think we plucked it straight from the rows of a meticulously maintained cornfield. It’s almost as if the GMO corn and tummy aches are locked in an ear-resistible tango, performing a dance of distress that’s hard to miss.

This finding may leave some feeling a bit corn-fused, but the evidence speaks for itself. The statistical significance of the correlation suggests that GMO corn may indeed be causing more than just a-MAIZE-ing yields – it could also be contributing to some real stomach discomfort. So, the next time you reach for that cob of GMO corn, remember that it might not just be your taste buds getting a workout – your stomach might join in on the action too.

In conclusion, our results provide compelling evidence that GMO use in corn grown in Ohio is intricately linked to the public's concern for stomach ailments. It's a revelation that may leave some feeling as queasy as that leftover corn on the cob in the fridge, but it's a crucial step in understanding the potential impact of GMOs on human health. Let's hope that in the future, the world of corn genetics can provide more kernels of wisdom without leaving our stomachs in a twist.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and Google searches for 'tummy ache'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Maize Genetics: A Corny Connection Between GMOs and Google Searches for 'Tummy Ache'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the realm of corn genetics and its impact on the popular topic of stomach discomfort, as evidenced by Google searches for "tummy ache." While some might consider this research a-corn-y, we take it seriously. Using data from the USDA and Google Trends, we conducted a thorough analysis spanning from 2004 to 2023 to unearth the potential link between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and public interest in stomach-related ailments. To our surprise, a correlation coefficient of 0.9508392 and a p-value of less than 0.01 manifested, indicating a statistically significant association. So, the next time you have a tummy ache after consuming GMO corn, it might not just be a kernel of truth – it could be a real stomach-churner.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In the realm of agricultural genetics, the impact of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) on human health has been a topic of prolific research and lively debate. Smith et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of existing studies on the safety of GMO consumption, concluding that there is currently no substantial evidence to suggest adverse effects on human health. On the other hand, Doe and Jones (2018) presented a longitudinal study examining the potential long-term consequences of GMO consumption, raising concerns about its impact on gastrointestinal function.
As we pivot to the corn-centric context of our investigation, it is essential to acknowledge the groundbreaking work of "GMOs and You: A Digestible Guide" by Dr. Amy Cornwell, which provides a comprehensive overview of the science and controversies surrounding genetically modified crops. Furthermore, "The Corn Conundrum: A Kernel of Truth" by Dr. Harold Maize sheds light on the historical, cultural, and scientific dimensions of corn cultivation, offering a-maize-ing insights.
Turning to more fictional contributions, "Children of the Corn" by Stephen King presents a chilling narrative set amidst the vast cornfields of Nebraska, offering a gripping tale of supernatural horrors and unsettling mysteries. Similarly, "The Corn Identity" by Robert Ludlum introduces a thrilling espionage plot with a protagonist entangled in a web of intrigue and corn-related conspiracies.
In the realm of cinema, our scholarly pursuits led us to movies such as "Field of Dreams," where the intersection of cornfields and unfulfilled desires takes center stage. Additionally, "The Wizard of Oz" merits attention for its iconic yellow brick road, which wouldn't be complete without the presence of a certain maize-related element.
While these references may seem like a-maize-ing diversions, they serve to exemplify the diverse cultural and literary landscape in which corn has been featured. Our study seeks to navigate through this amalgamation of real and fictional representations to shed light on the very real connection between GMO corn and public interest in gastrointestinal discomfort, as indicated by Google searches for 'tummy ache'. Let's dive deep into the kernel of this research and see what pops up.

[[RESULTS]]
After painstakingly harvesting data from the USDA and Google Trends, we unearthed some corny, yet compelling results. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9508392, with an r-squared value of 0.9040951, and a p-value of less than 0.01. It seems the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and public interest in tummy-related troubles is not just a husk.
Figure 1 displays the scatterplot that unequivocally illustrates the robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The data points form a pattern so clear, you'd think we plucked it straight from the rows of a meticulously maintained cornfield. It’s almost as if the GMO corn and tummy aches are locked in an ear-resistible tango, performing a dance of distress that’s hard to miss.
This finding may leave some feeling a bit corn-fused, but the evidence speaks for itself. The statistical significance of the correlation suggests that GMO corn may indeed be causing more than just a-MAIZE-ing yields – it could also be contributing to some real stomach discomfort. So, the next time you reach for that cob of GMO corn, remember that it might not just be your taste buds getting a workout – your stomach might join in on the action too.
In conclusion, our results provide compelling evidence that GMO use in corn grown in Ohio is intricately linked to the public's concern for stomach ailments. It's a revelation that may leave some feeling as queasy as that leftover corn on the cob in the fridge, but it's a crucial step in understanding the potential impact of GMOs on human health. Let's hope that in the future, the world of corn genetics can provide more kernels of wisdom without leaving our stomachs in a twist.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings corroborate the prior research exploring the intersection of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and human health. Smith et al. (2015) laid the groundwork by conducting a comprehensive meta-analysis, concluding that GMO consumption does not pose substantial risks to human health. While their study focused on a broad spectrum of GMOs, our research aimed to zoom in on the specific context of GMO corn and its potential connection to gastrointestinal discomfort.

Doe and Jones (2018) added a nuanced layer to the discourse by highlighting concerns about the long-term impact of GMO consumption on gastrointestinal function. Our results echo these concerns, suggesting a tangible association between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and public interest in stomach-related ailments. It seems GMO corn may be causing more than just a stir in the agricultural landscape – it might be stirring up some stomach troubles too.

Turning to the literature review, while the inclusion of popular culture may initially seem like a kernel of comic relief in a serious academic pursuit, these references offer valuable insights into the cultural significance of corn and its presence in the public imagination. Our study, in its serious pursuit of scientific inquiry, sought to bridge the gap between scientific discourse and cultural representation, recognizing that corn's significance extends beyond its agricultural and genetic dimensions.

The statistical significance of the correlation coefficient in our results underscores the potential impact of GMO use in corn on public health concerns. As we embark on further investigations, it's essential to continue unraveling the intricacies of this relationship and consider the broader implications for public health policy and consumer awareness. Like a cornstalk reaching for the sun, our research aims to shed light on the interplay between agricultural practices, genetic modification, and human well-being. So, as we navigate this maize of research, let's remain open to the ear-resistible insights that may emerge.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and Google searches for 'tummy ache'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Maize Genetics: A Corny Connection Between GMOs and Google Searches for 'Tummy Ache'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the realm of corn genetics and its impact on the popular topic of stomach discomfort, as evidenced by Google searches for "tummy ache." While some might consider this research a-corn-y, we take it seriously. Using data from the USDA and Google Trends, we conducted a thorough analysis spanning from 2004 to 2023 to unearth the potential link between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and public interest in stomach-related ailments. To our surprise, a correlation coefficient of 0.9508392 and a p-value of less than 0.01 manifested, indicating a statistically significant association. So, the next time you have a tummy ache after consuming GMO corn, it might not just be a kernel of truth – it could be a real stomach-churner.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of genetics is a fascinating one, full of twists, turns, and the occasional kernel of truth. In this study, we set out to explore the relationship between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Ohio and the frequency of Google searches for the colloquial phrase "tummy ache." While this topic may initially seem as far-fetched as finding a needle in a haystack, we were determined to separate the corn from the chaff and uncover any possible connections.
Corn, known scientifically as Zea mays, has been a staple crop in the United States for centuries. First domesticated by indigenous peoples in Central America, it has since become a ubiquitous presence in the agricultural landscapes of the Midwest, including the great state of Ohio. However, the introduction of genetically modified corn in the late 20th century brought with it a bushel of controversy. Critics of GMOs have raised concerns about their potential impact on human health, while proponents argue for their benefits in increasing crop yields and reducing the need for chemical pesticides. This ongoing debate has left the public in a bit of a maize, so to speak, regarding the potential effects of GMO corn consumption.
At the same time, the phenomenon of using Google searches as a proxy for public health concerns has blossomed faster than an untended field of corn in the summer. With the wealth of information available at our fingertips, it seems that more and more people are turning to the internet to diagnose their ailments, often leading to a virtual maze of self-diagnosis and, at times, a-maize-ing revelations.
Given the prevalence of GMOs in corn production and the widespread use of internet search engines to seek out health-related information, we believed it was high time to dig in and discover whether there might be a stomach-churning correlation between the two. So, brace yourself for a journey through the tangled stalks of maize genetics and the twisty pathways of online search trends. It's not just a-maize-ing – it's a-maize-ingly relevant.

[[RESULTS]]
After painstakingly harvesting data from the USDA and Google Trends, we unearthed some corny, yet compelling results. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9508392, with an r-squared value of 0.9040951, and a p-value of less than 0.01. It seems the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and public interest in tummy-related troubles is not just a husk.
Figure 1 displays the scatterplot that unequivocally illustrates the robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The data points form a pattern so clear, you'd think we plucked it straight from the rows of a meticulously maintained cornfield. It’s almost as if the GMO corn and tummy aches are locked in an ear-resistible tango, performing a dance of distress that’s hard to miss.
This finding may leave some feeling a bit corn-fused, but the evidence speaks for itself. The statistical significance of the correlation suggests that GMO corn may indeed be causing more than just a-MAIZE-ing yields – it could also be contributing to some real stomach discomfort. So, the next time you reach for that cob of GMO corn, remember that it might not just be your taste buds getting a workout – your stomach might join in on the action too.
In conclusion, our results provide compelling evidence that GMO use in corn grown in Ohio is intricately linked to the public's concern for stomach ailments. It's a revelation that may leave some feeling as queasy as that leftover corn on the cob in the fridge, but it's a crucial step in understanding the potential impact of GMOs on human health. Let's hope that in the future, the world of corn genetics can provide more kernels of wisdom without leaving our stomachs in a twist.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In the tangle of maize genetics and the maze of online search trends, our findings have shucked the notion of GMO corn's innocence. The robust correlation between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and the public's interest in tummy troubles cannot be dismissed as mere cornspiracy. It seems that GMO corn not only delivers a-MAIZE-ing yields but also a stomach-churning experience that may leave you feeling more than just a little husky.

As we bid adieu to this twisty journey through the cornfields of research, we have harvested a kernel of truth. Our results have buttered up the belief that GMO corn may indeed be causing some real stomach discomfort. So, the next time you're at the dinner table contemplating a serving of GMO corn, tread cautiously, for your stomach might just have a cornundrum awaiting it. It's not just GMO – it's stomach-MO!

In this light, further research in this area seems about as necessary as a scarecrow in a field of plastic corn – in other words, not at all. Let's pop the corn and call this kernel of wisdom popped.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Maize Genetics: A Corny Connection Between GMOs and Google Searches for 'Tummy Ache'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agri-Humor Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Maize Genetics: A Corny Connection Between GMOs and Google Searches for 'Tummy Ache'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Crop Genetics and Digestive Health


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Maize Genetics: A Corny Connection Between GMOs and Google Searches for 'Tummy Ache' with an abstract of In this study, we delved into the realm of corn genetics and its impact on the popular topic of stomach discomfort, as evidenced by Google searches for "tummy ache." While some might consider this research a-corn-y, we take it seriously. Using data from the USDA and Google Trends, we conducted a thorough analysis spanning from 2004 to 2023 to unearth the potential link between GMO use in corn grown in Ohio and public interest in stomach-related ailments. To our surprise, a correlation coefficient of 0.9508392 and a p-value of less than 0.01 manifested, indicating a statistically significant association. So, the next time you have a tummy ache after consuming GMO corn, it might not just be a kernel of truth – it could be a real stomach-churner.

ChatGPT:

Maize genetics, GMOs, corn genetics, stomach discomfort, tummy ache, Google searches, USDA data, GMO corn, Ohio, correlation coefficient, statistical association

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn grown in Ohio
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in Ohio genetically modified with both Bt and HT
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in Ohio

Google searches for 'tummy ache'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'tummy ache' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'tummy ache'

Correlation r = 0.9508392 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9040951 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 90.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'tummy ache') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in Ohio) over the 20 years from 2004 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.3E-10. 0.0000000001331858353135225000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.95 in 1.3E-8% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 7,508,305,952 random variables You don't actually need 7 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.88, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
GMO use in corn grown in Ohio (GMO corn %)1252037353637436369686666707671708076
Google searches for 'tummy ache' (Rel. search volume)11.7512.751718.7521.666727.534.833342.66675155.58336065.416769.083371.166777.916782.583383.583.583390.590.9




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1,2,5,20,37,35,36,37,43,63,69,68,66,66,70,76,71,70,80,76,])
array_2 = np.array([11.75,12.75,17,18.75,21.6667,27.5,34.8333,42.6667,51,55.5833,60,65.4167,69.0833,71.1667,77.9167,82.5833,83.5,83.5833,90.5,90.9,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in Ohio"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'tummy ache'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation rating is out of this world!


Correlation ID: 1297 · Black Variable ID: 748 · Red Variable ID: 1345
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0