Download png, svg
AI explanation
As butter consumption increased, so did the number of buttery smooth business transactions, churning out profits and greasing the wheels of the local economy. The correlation is udderly undeniable - more butter, more economic power in the Washington metro area.
Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image of a vibrant farmer's market in the Washington metro area, where sticks of butter from local farms are the center of attention. Show the tables bustling with people eagerly purchasing and using the butter. Surrounding vendors selling flowers, fruits, and vegetables experience a surge in sales as the aroma of freshly baked goods made with butter fills the air. Local cafes and bakeries are packed with customers, and the entire area is buzzing with economic activity as the demand for butter continues to rise. The scene should capture the magical and bustling atmosphere of the farmer's market in an artful and visually enchanting way. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: Butter Believe It: How Butter Consumption Boosted the Washington Metro Area's Economic Output In a turn of events that could only be described as a 'spread' of good fortune, a recent study has revealed a surprising correlation between increased butter consumption and a rise in the economic output of the Washington metro area. It seems that as butter sales 'spread' like wildfire, so too did the economic prosperity of the region, 'churning' out impressive growth figures. Analysts are now calling it the "Butter Effect" and recommending a 'butter' safe than sorry approach to economic planning.. Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Psychedelic Cyber folk Data cyber art Magic realism High-tech
ChatGPT: Magic realism
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. Butter Believe It: How Butter Consumption Boosted the Washington Metro Area's Economic Output In a turn of events that could only be described as a 'spread' of good fortune, a recent study has revealed a surprising correlation between increased butter consumption and a rise in the economic output of the Washington metro area. It seems that as butter sales 'spread' like wildfire, so too did the economic prosperity of the region, 'churning' out impressive growth figures. Analysts are now calling it the "Butter Effect" and recommending a 'butter' safe than sorry approach to economic planning.
ChatGPT: Imagine a bustling farmer's market in the Washington metro area, where tables are filled with sticks of butter, fresh from the farm. People are eagerly purchasing and using the butter, and as they do, the surrounding vendors selling flowers, fruits, and vegetables experience a surge in sales. The aroma of freshly baked goods made with butter fills the air, and local cafes and bakeries are packed with customers. The entire area is buzzing with economic activity as the demand for butter continues to rise.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Magic realism ] and depicting this scene: Imagine a bustling farmer's market in the Washington metro area, where tables are filled with sticks of butter, fresh from the farm. People are eagerly purchasing and using the butter, and as they do, the surrounding vendors selling flowers, fruits, and vegetables experience a surge in sales. The aroma of freshly baked goods made with butter fills the air, and local cafes and bakeries are packed with customers. The entire area is buzzing with economic activity as the demand for butter continues to rise. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image of a vibrant farmer's market in the Washington metro area, where sticks of butter from local farms are the center of attention. Show the tables bustling with people eagerly purchasing and using the butter. Surrounding vendors selling flowers, fruits, and vegetables experience a surge in sales as the aroma of freshly baked goods made with butter fills the air. Local cafes and bakeries are packed with customers, and the entire area is buzzing with economic activity as the demand for butter continues to rise. The scene should capture the magical and bustling atmosphere of the farmer's market in an artful and visually enchanting way.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Butter consumption caused Economic output of Washington metro area to increase.
AI academic paper
 |
Spreading Wealth: The Butter-ly Effect on the Economic Churn in the Washington Metro Area Journal of Economic Entomology Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Economic output of Washington metro area. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.
Your research team used data from USDA and Statista to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9783201 and p < 0.01 for 2001 to 2021.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Spreading Wealth: The Butter-ly Effect on the Economic Churn in the Washington Metro Area
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the uncharted territory of butter consumption and its impact on the economic output of the Washington metro area. While the relationship between butter and economic productivity may initially seem outlandish, our findings unveil surprising connections that cannot be buttered up. Utilizing data from the USDA and Statista, we conducted a correlation analysis for the period of 2001 to 2021. The results reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9783201, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our analysis suggests that there may indeed be a link between butter consumption and economic output in the Washington metro area, offering food for thought in understanding the dairy dynamics of economic growth.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Economic output of Washington metro area. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Spreading Wealth: The Butter-ly Effect on the Economic Churn in the Washington Metro Area
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the uncharted territory of butter consumption and its impact on the economic output of the Washington metro area. While the relationship between butter and economic productivity may initially seem outlandish, our findings unveil surprising connections that cannot be buttered up. Utilizing data from the USDA and Statista, we conducted a correlation analysis for the period of 2001 to 2021. The results reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9783201, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our analysis suggests that there may indeed be a link between butter consumption and economic output in the Washington metro area, offering food for thought in understanding the dairy dynamics of economic growth.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The bustling urban landscape of the Washington metro area is home to a myriad of economic activities, from government operations to bustling commercial enterprises. As researchers, it is our duty to churn out new insights that can spread light on the mechanisms underlying economic growth. In this vein, we turn our attention to the unassuming dairy product – butter. Our study aims to unravel the potential butter-ly effect on the economic churn in this thriving metropolitan region.
Now, one might be inclined to butter us up with enticing tales of the exalted virtues of butter. However, we must not let ourselves be swayed by its creamy temptations and instead apply a sharp, analytical lens to the subject at hand. Our exploration of the curious connection between butter consumption and economic output sets out to churn the waters of conventional economic wisdom.
The initial reaction to the proposition of butter influencing economic activity may understandably be one of skepticism. After all, the buttery smoothness of this hypothesis might seem too good to be true. However, it is precisely when a hypothesis seems too good to be true that we must proceed with statistical rigor to separate margarine of error from the creamy truth.
The methodology of our study draws from a blend of agricultural and economic data, which we have meticulously whipped into shape for analysis. We have utilized data from the USDA to obtain butter consumption figures and economic statistics pertaining to the Washington metro area. Meanwhile, numbers concerning GDP, employment, and other economic indicators have been sourced from reputable data repositories, avoiding any sourceness in our data compilation.
Our analysis dances between the data points, seeking not to churn out trivial findings, but rather to butter up our understanding of the interplay between butter consumption and economic productivity. The correlation analysis we present spans the fruitful period from 2001 to 2021, allowing us to butter up a rich dataset that captures the economic ebb and flow of the region. The insights gleaned from these analyses have the potential to illuminate a path towards a better understanding of the economic churn and the hidden forces at play.
As we delve into the data and present our findings, we invite the reader to approach this study with an open mind, ready to embrace the unexpected and perhaps even to spread their understanding of the economic churn a little bit thinner – or should we say, butter? By doing so, we hope to contribute to the growing body of knowledge that enriches our understanding of the eclectic factors that shape economic activity.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Economic output of Washington metro area. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Spreading Wealth: The Butter-ly Effect on the Economic Churn in the Washington Metro Area
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the uncharted territory of butter consumption and its impact on the economic output of the Washington metro area. While the relationship between butter and economic productivity may initially seem outlandish, our findings unveil surprising connections that cannot be buttered up. Utilizing data from the USDA and Statista, we conducted a correlation analysis for the period of 2001 to 2021. The results reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9783201, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our analysis suggests that there may indeed be a link between butter consumption and economic output in the Washington metro area, offering food for thought in understanding the dairy dynamics of economic growth.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The bustling urban landscape of the Washington metro area is home to a myriad of economic activities, from government operations to bustling commercial enterprises. As researchers, it is our duty to churn out new insights that can spread light on the mechanisms underlying economic growth. In this vein, we turn our attention to the unassuming dairy product – butter. Our study aims to unravel the potential butter-ly effect on the economic churn in this thriving metropolitan region.
Now, one might be inclined to butter us up with enticing tales of the exalted virtues of butter. However, we must not let ourselves be swayed by its creamy temptations and instead apply a sharp, analytical lens to the subject at hand. Our exploration of the curious connection between butter consumption and economic output sets out to churn the waters of conventional economic wisdom.
The initial reaction to the proposition of butter influencing economic activity may understandably be one of skepticism. After all, the buttery smoothness of this hypothesis might seem too good to be true. However, it is precisely when a hypothesis seems too good to be true that we must proceed with statistical rigor to separate margarine of error from the creamy truth.
The methodology of our study draws from a blend of agricultural and economic data, which we have meticulously whipped into shape for analysis. We have utilized data from the USDA to obtain butter consumption figures and economic statistics pertaining to the Washington metro area. Meanwhile, numbers concerning GDP, employment, and other economic indicators have been sourced from reputable data repositories, avoiding any sourceness in our data compilation.
Our analysis dances between the data points, seeking not to churn out trivial findings, but rather to butter up our understanding of the interplay between butter consumption and economic productivity. The correlation analysis we present spans the fruitful period from 2001 to 2021, allowing us to butter up a rich dataset that captures the economic ebb and flow of the region. The insights gleaned from these analyses have the potential to illuminate a path towards a better understanding of the economic churn and the hidden forces at play.
As we delve into the data and present our findings, we invite the reader to approach this study with an open mind, ready to embrace the unexpected and perhaps even to spread their understanding of the economic churn a little bit thinner – or should we say, butter? By doing so, we hope to contribute to the growing body of knowledge that enriches our understanding of the eclectic factors that shape economic activity.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The researchers examining the potential link between butter consumption and economic output in the Washington metro area are not the first to venture into unconventional territory in the realm of economic studies. Smith and colleagues (2010) explored the impact of cocoa bean production on the economic growth of a small island nation, demonstrating that even seemingly niche agricultural commodities can exert unexpected influences on economic dynamics. Similarly, Doe et al. (2015) investigated the relationship between avocado consumption and real estate prices in California, unearthing a surprisingly strong connection that left many scratching their heads in disbelief. Jones (2018) delved into the world of wine production and its effects on tourism, showcasing how the subtle nuances of regional cuisine can shape broader economic trends.
Before delving into the more playful connections, it is important to acknowledge some more serious contributions to the literature. In "Dairy Economics: Theory and Policy" by Agricultural and Applied Economics Association (2019), the authors delve into the intricate economic mechanisms of dairy production and consumption, providing a comprehensive overview of the dairy industry's economic significance. Additionally, "The Economics of Food and Agricultural Markets" by Andrew Barkley (2017) offers a thorough examination of the factors influencing food markets, including the role of various food products in regional and national economies.
Turning to the world of fiction, the novel "The Butter Battle Book" by Dr. Seuss (1984) provides a whimsical exploration of the absurdity of human conflict through a seemingly trivial disagreement over buttering bread. While this work may not directly address the economic implications of butter, it serves as a reminder of the potential for seemingly inconsequential matters to escalate into substantial issues with far-reaching consequences.
In the realm of animated television, "The Magic School Bus" and its episode titled "The Biscuit and Butter Expedition" introduce young viewers to the sheer delight of dairy products while casually promoting the virtues of curiosity and scientific exploration. Likewise, "Tom and Jerry" featuring numerous episodes centering around the comedic mishaps involving butter, consistently providing a source of delight for viewers of all ages. These lighthearted references serve as a reminder of the diverse ways in which butter permeates popular culture, intertwining with economic themes in unexpected yet delightful ways.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Economic output of Washington metro area. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Statista . You used data from 2001 to 2021
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Spreading Wealth: The Butter-ly Effect on the Economic Churn in the Washington Metro Area
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the uncharted territory of butter consumption and its impact on the economic output of the Washington metro area. While the relationship between butter and economic productivity may initially seem outlandish, our findings unveil surprising connections that cannot be buttered up. Utilizing data from the USDA and Statista, we conducted a correlation analysis for the period of 2001 to 2021. The results reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9783201, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our analysis suggests that there may indeed be a link between butter consumption and economic output in the Washington metro area, offering food for thought in understanding the dairy dynamics of economic growth.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The bustling urban landscape of the Washington metro area is home to a myriad of economic activities, from government operations to bustling commercial enterprises. As researchers, it is our duty to churn out new insights that can spread light on the mechanisms underlying economic growth. In this vein, we turn our attention to the unassuming dairy product – butter. Our study aims to unravel the potential butter-ly effect on the economic churn in this thriving metropolitan region.
Now, one might be inclined to butter us up with enticing tales of the exalted virtues of butter. However, we must not let ourselves be swayed by its creamy temptations and instead apply a sharp, analytical lens to the subject at hand. Our exploration of the curious connection between butter consumption and economic output sets out to churn the waters of conventional economic wisdom.
The initial reaction to the proposition of butter influencing economic activity may understandably be one of skepticism. After all, the buttery smoothness of this hypothesis might seem too good to be true. However, it is precisely when a hypothesis seems too good to be true that we must proceed with statistical rigor to separate margarine of error from the creamy truth.
The methodology of our study draws from a blend of agricultural and economic data, which we have meticulously whipped into shape for analysis. We have utilized data from the USDA to obtain butter consumption figures and economic statistics pertaining to the Washington metro area. Meanwhile, numbers concerning GDP, employment, and other economic indicators have been sourced from reputable data repositories, avoiding any sourceness in our data compilation.
Our analysis dances between the data points, seeking not to churn out trivial findings, but rather to butter up our understanding of the interplay between butter consumption and economic productivity. The correlation analysis we present spans the fruitful period from 2001 to 2021, allowing us to butter up a rich dataset that captures the economic ebb and flow of the region. The insights gleaned from these analyses have the potential to illuminate a path towards a better understanding of the economic churn and the hidden forces at play.
As we delve into the data and present our findings, we invite the reader to approach this study with an open mind, ready to embrace the unexpected and perhaps even to spread their understanding of the economic churn a little bit thinner – or should we say, butter? By doing so, we hope to contribute to the growing body of knowledge that enriches our understanding of the eclectic factors that shape economic activity.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To commence our exploration of the curious correlation between butter consumption and economic output in the Washington metro area, we conducted a methodologically rich and dairy-detailed analysis. Our approach began by churning through copious amounts of data sourced from the USDA and Statista, as we sought to melt away any uncertainty surrounding our variables.
The first step in our methodological butter-churn was to gather extensive data on butter consumption within the Washington metro area. Utilizing information from the USDA’s greasy details on butter production and consumption, we amassed a rich dairy dataset spanning the years 2001 to 2021. The meticulous documentation of butter consumption patterns allowed us to form a buttery smooth foundation for our analysis, ensuring we didn’t spread ourselves too thin when examining the economic churning of the region.
In parallel, our research team meticulously retrieved economic statistics that reflected the financial froth of the Washington metro area. Hopping from Statista to various other reputable data repositories, we extracted data on the GDP, employment figures, and other economic indicators. This comprehensive compilation process was a veritable whirlwind – but we knew that without a detailed breakdown of the economic churn, our analysis could curdle into a statistical nightmare.
With our data shimmering under the statistical spotlight, we indulged in a correlation analysis that churned through the numbers with the precision of a butter knife. This analysis revealed a notably high correlation coefficient of 0.9783201 – a figure so striking that it would make even the most ardent butter enthusiast’s heart melt. Furthermore, the p-value yielded by our statistical jugglery clocked in at less than 0.01, firmly anchoring the significance of the relationship between butter consumption and economic output. It was a statistical delight we could spread and savor!
As we wade through the statistical churn, it is important to note that our methodology ensured that all data was sampled and analyzed with the utmost attention to detail. We wouldn’t want to leave a single chunk of uncertainty floating in the analytical churn, after all. Our butter-laden journey was guided by the pursuit of scientific rigor, ensuring that we churned through our data with the precision and care it deserved.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Economic output of Washington metro area. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Statista .
For the time period 2001 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9783201, r-squared of 0.9571103, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Spreading Wealth: The Butter-ly Effect on the Economic Churn in the Washington Metro Area
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the uncharted territory of butter consumption and its impact on the economic output of the Washington metro area. While the relationship between butter and economic productivity may initially seem outlandish, our findings unveil surprising connections that cannot be buttered up. Utilizing data from the USDA and Statista, we conducted a correlation analysis for the period of 2001 to 2021. The results reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9783201, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our analysis suggests that there may indeed be a link between butter consumption and economic output in the Washington metro area, offering food for thought in understanding the dairy dynamics of economic growth.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The bustling urban landscape of the Washington metro area is home to a myriad of economic activities, from government operations to bustling commercial enterprises. As researchers, it is our duty to churn out new insights that can spread light on the mechanisms underlying economic growth. In this vein, we turn our attention to the unassuming dairy product – butter. Our study aims to unravel the potential butter-ly effect on the economic churn in this thriving metropolitan region.
Now, one might be inclined to butter us up with enticing tales of the exalted virtues of butter. However, we must not let ourselves be swayed by its creamy temptations and instead apply a sharp, analytical lens to the subject at hand. Our exploration of the curious connection between butter consumption and economic output sets out to churn the waters of conventional economic wisdom.
The initial reaction to the proposition of butter influencing economic activity may understandably be one of skepticism. After all, the buttery smoothness of this hypothesis might seem too good to be true. However, it is precisely when a hypothesis seems too good to be true that we must proceed with statistical rigor to separate margarine of error from the creamy truth.
The methodology of our study draws from a blend of agricultural and economic data, which we have meticulously whipped into shape for analysis. We have utilized data from the USDA to obtain butter consumption figures and economic statistics pertaining to the Washington metro area. Meanwhile, numbers concerning GDP, employment, and other economic indicators have been sourced from reputable data repositories, avoiding any sourceness in our data compilation.
Our analysis dances between the data points, seeking not to churn out trivial findings, but rather to butter up our understanding of the interplay between butter consumption and economic productivity. The correlation analysis we present spans the fruitful period from 2001 to 2021, allowing us to butter up a rich dataset that captures the economic ebb and flow of the region. The insights gleaned from these analyses have the potential to illuminate a path towards a better understanding of the economic churn and the hidden forces at play.
As we delve into the data and present our findings, we invite the reader to approach this study with an open mind, ready to embrace the unexpected and perhaps even to spread their understanding of the economic churn a little bit thinner – or should we say, butter? By doing so, we hope to contribute to the growing body of knowledge that enriches our understanding of the eclectic factors that shape economic activity.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our correlation analysis between butter consumption and economic output in the Washington metro area reveal an intriguingly strong relationship. Over the period of 2001 to 2021, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.9783201. This strikingly high correlation coefficient suggests that as butter consumption fluctuated, so too did the economic output of this bustling region. It appears that the economic churn of the Washington metro area could indeed be influenced by the spreadable goodness of butter.
Further bolstering the robustness of this relationship, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was calculated to be 0.9571103. This means that a whopping 95.71% of the variability in economic output can be explained by changes in butter consumption. It is quite rare to see such a high r-squared value in social science research, so we are utterly butterly delighted by this finding.
More importantly, the p-value associated with this correlation was found to be less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship. This means that the likelihood of observing such a strong correlation by random chance is as slim as a pat of butter. It's clear that the correlations we observed are no mere imitation butter, but the real, statistically significant deal.
In Fig. 1, we present a scatterplot depicting the clear, linear relationship between butter consumption and economic output in the Washington metro area. The data points hug the regression line like butter on toast, leaving little doubt about the strength of this relationship. It's as if the statistical gods have generously spread out the butter across our scatterplot, leaving no room for doubt about the connectivity of these variables.
Overall, our findings shed light on the potential impact of butter consumption on the economic churn of the Washington metro area. It seems that the butter-ly effect may be more than just a flaky hypothesis, but a genuine factor to consider when analyzing economic growth in this region. These results present a golden opportunity for future research to further churn the buttery mysteries underlying economic activity and perhaps even inspire a more spread-out approach to economic analysis.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Economic output of Washington metro area. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Spreading Wealth: The Butter-ly Effect on the Economic Churn in the Washington Metro Area
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the uncharted territory of butter consumption and its impact on the economic output of the Washington metro area. While the relationship between butter and economic productivity may initially seem outlandish, our findings unveil surprising connections that cannot be buttered up. Utilizing data from the USDA and Statista, we conducted a correlation analysis for the period of 2001 to 2021. The results reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9783201, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our analysis suggests that there may indeed be a link between butter consumption and economic output in the Washington metro area, offering food for thought in understanding the dairy dynamics of economic growth.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The researchers examining the potential link between butter consumption and economic output in the Washington metro area are not the first to venture into unconventional territory in the realm of economic studies. Smith and colleagues (2010) explored the impact of cocoa bean production on the economic growth of a small island nation, demonstrating that even seemingly niche agricultural commodities can exert unexpected influences on economic dynamics. Similarly, Doe et al. (2015) investigated the relationship between avocado consumption and real estate prices in California, unearthing a surprisingly strong connection that left many scratching their heads in disbelief. Jones (2018) delved into the world of wine production and its effects on tourism, showcasing how the subtle nuances of regional cuisine can shape broader economic trends.
Before delving into the more playful connections, it is important to acknowledge some more serious contributions to the literature. In "Dairy Economics: Theory and Policy" by Agricultural and Applied Economics Association (2019), the authors delve into the intricate economic mechanisms of dairy production and consumption, providing a comprehensive overview of the dairy industry's economic significance. Additionally, "The Economics of Food and Agricultural Markets" by Andrew Barkley (2017) offers a thorough examination of the factors influencing food markets, including the role of various food products in regional and national economies.
Turning to the world of fiction, the novel "The Butter Battle Book" by Dr. Seuss (1984) provides a whimsical exploration of the absurdity of human conflict through a seemingly trivial disagreement over buttering bread. While this work may not directly address the economic implications of butter, it serves as a reminder of the potential for seemingly inconsequential matters to escalate into substantial issues with far-reaching consequences.
In the realm of animated television, "The Magic School Bus" and its episode titled "The Biscuit and Butter Expedition" introduce young viewers to the sheer delight of dairy products while casually promoting the virtues of curiosity and scientific exploration. Likewise, "Tom and Jerry" featuring numerous episodes centering around the comedic mishaps involving butter, consistently providing a source of delight for viewers of all ages. These lighthearted references serve as a reminder of the diverse ways in which butter permeates popular culture, intertwining with economic themes in unexpected yet delightful ways.
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our correlation analysis between butter consumption and economic output in the Washington metro area reveal an intriguingly strong relationship. Over the period of 2001 to 2021, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.9783201. This strikingly high correlation coefficient suggests that as butter consumption fluctuated, so too did the economic output of this bustling region. It appears that the economic churn of the Washington metro area could indeed be influenced by the spreadable goodness of butter.
Further bolstering the robustness of this relationship, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was calculated to be 0.9571103. This means that a whopping 95.71% of the variability in economic output can be explained by changes in butter consumption. It is quite rare to see such a high r-squared value in social science research, so we are utterly butterly delighted by this finding.
More importantly, the p-value associated with this correlation was found to be less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship. This means that the likelihood of observing such a strong correlation by random chance is as slim as a pat of butter. It's clear that the correlations we observed are no mere imitation butter, but the real, statistically significant deal.
In Fig. 1, we present a scatterplot depicting the clear, linear relationship between butter consumption and economic output in the Washington metro area. The data points hug the regression line like butter on toast, leaving little doubt about the strength of this relationship. It's as if the statistical gods have generously spread out the butter across our scatterplot, leaving no room for doubt about the connectivity of these variables.
Overall, our findings shed light on the potential impact of butter consumption on the economic churn of the Washington metro area. It seems that the butter-ly effect may be more than just a flaky hypothesis, but a genuine factor to consider when analyzing economic growth in this region. These results present a golden opportunity for future research to further churn the buttery mysteries underlying economic activity and perhaps even inspire a more spread-out approach to economic analysis.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The results of our analysis undeniably unveil a strikingly strong relationship between butter consumption and economic output in the Washington metro area. The correlation coefficient of 0.9783201 points to a connection that is as smooth as melted butter, indicating that changes in butter consumption are closely intertwined with fluctuations in economic productivity. These findings not only support our initial hypothesis but also resonate with prior research that has explored the unexpected influence of seemingly niche agricultural commodities on economic dynamics. Our study brings to light the butter-ly effect, demonstrating that butter consumption may indeed play a substantial role in shaping the economic churn of this bustling region.
The remarkably high coefficient of determination (r-squared) further solidifies the robustness of this relationship, explaining a whopping 95.71% of the variability in economic output. In the realms of statistics, such a high r-squared value is akin to finding a golden ticket in a sea of data, signifying the rare and treasured nature of this observation. The statistically significant p-value also bolsters the credibility of our findings, indicating that the likelihood of observing such a strong correlation by random chance is as slim as finding a dairy-free substitute for butter that tastes just as good.
Our findings not only contribute to the burgeoning field of niche agricultural commodity economics but also underscore the need to embrace a more holistic approach to economic analysis. While the whimsical nature of our research topic may invite a chuckle, it prompts a broader reflection on the interconnected web of factors that shape economic trends. Just as avocado consumption has been linked to real estate prices in California, and wine production has influenced tourism, our study adds a creamy layer to the understanding of how seemingly innocuous agricultural products may ripple through the economic fabric of a region.
As we consider the significance of butter in our everyday lives, from enriching pastries to adding flavor to savory dishes, it becomes evident that our study uncovers a nuanced layer of economic interconnectedness. Perhaps it is time to adopt a more spread-out approach to economic analysis, one that embraces the seemingly trivial yet influential factors that contribute to economic activity. While the butter-ly effect may initially appear as whimsical as a humorous anecdote, it carries the weight of statistical evidence that cannot be churned away.
In conclusion, our research provides a compelling foundation for further exploration of the butter-ly effect on economic dynamics, offering a rich field of study that holds both academic intrigue and potentially lucrative implications. It seems that our findings have indeed spread light on the butter-ly mysteries underlying economic activity, beckoning future research to explore the buttery goodness that transcends the confines of culinary delight and delves into the economic churn of regional productivity.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Economic output of Washington metro area. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Spreading Wealth: The Butter-ly Effect on the Economic Churn in the Washington Metro Area
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the uncharted territory of butter consumption and its impact on the economic output of the Washington metro area. While the relationship between butter and economic productivity may initially seem outlandish, our findings unveil surprising connections that cannot be buttered up. Utilizing data from the USDA and Statista, we conducted a correlation analysis for the period of 2001 to 2021. The results reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9783201, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our analysis suggests that there may indeed be a link between butter consumption and economic output in the Washington metro area, offering food for thought in understanding the dairy dynamics of economic growth.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
The bustling urban landscape of the Washington metro area is home to a myriad of economic activities, from government operations to bustling commercial enterprises. As researchers, it is our duty to churn out new insights that can spread light on the mechanisms underlying economic growth. In this vein, we turn our attention to the unassuming dairy product – butter. Our study aims to unravel the potential butter-ly effect on the economic churn in this thriving metropolitan region.
Now, one might be inclined to butter us up with enticing tales of the exalted virtues of butter. However, we must not let ourselves be swayed by its creamy temptations and instead apply a sharp, analytical lens to the subject at hand. Our exploration of the curious connection between butter consumption and economic output sets out to churn the waters of conventional economic wisdom.
The initial reaction to the proposition of butter influencing economic activity may understandably be one of skepticism. After all, the buttery smoothness of this hypothesis might seem too good to be true. However, it is precisely when a hypothesis seems too good to be true that we must proceed with statistical rigor to separate margarine of error from the creamy truth.
The methodology of our study draws from a blend of agricultural and economic data, which we have meticulously whipped into shape for analysis. We have utilized data from the USDA to obtain butter consumption figures and economic statistics pertaining to the Washington metro area. Meanwhile, numbers concerning GDP, employment, and other economic indicators have been sourced from reputable data repositories, avoiding any sourceness in our data compilation.
Our analysis dances between the data points, seeking not to churn out trivial findings, but rather to butter up our understanding of the interplay between butter consumption and economic productivity. The correlation analysis we present spans the fruitful period from 2001 to 2021, allowing us to butter up a rich dataset that captures the economic ebb and flow of the region. The insights gleaned from these analyses have the potential to illuminate a path towards a better understanding of the economic churn and the hidden forces at play.
As we delve into the data and present our findings, we invite the reader to approach this study with an open mind, ready to embrace the unexpected and perhaps even to spread their understanding of the economic churn a little bit thinner – or should we say, butter? By doing so, we hope to contribute to the growing body of knowledge that enriches our understanding of the eclectic factors that shape economic activity.
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our correlation analysis between butter consumption and economic output in the Washington metro area reveal an intriguingly strong relationship. Over the period of 2001 to 2021, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.9783201. This strikingly high correlation coefficient suggests that as butter consumption fluctuated, so too did the economic output of this bustling region. It appears that the economic churn of the Washington metro area could indeed be influenced by the spreadable goodness of butter.
Further bolstering the robustness of this relationship, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was calculated to be 0.9571103. This means that a whopping 95.71% of the variability in economic output can be explained by changes in butter consumption. It is quite rare to see such a high r-squared value in social science research, so we are utterly butterly delighted by this finding.
More importantly, the p-value associated with this correlation was found to be less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship. This means that the likelihood of observing such a strong correlation by random chance is as slim as a pat of butter. It's clear that the correlations we observed are no mere imitation butter, but the real, statistically significant deal.
In Fig. 1, we present a scatterplot depicting the clear, linear relationship between butter consumption and economic output in the Washington metro area. The data points hug the regression line like butter on toast, leaving little doubt about the strength of this relationship. It's as if the statistical gods have generously spread out the butter across our scatterplot, leaving no room for doubt about the connectivity of these variables.
Overall, our findings shed light on the potential impact of butter consumption on the economic churn of the Washington metro area. It seems that the butter-ly effect may be more than just a flaky hypothesis, but a genuine factor to consider when analyzing economic growth in this region. These results present a golden opportunity for future research to further churn the buttery mysteries underlying economic activity and perhaps even inspire a more spread-out approach to economic analysis.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our study has churned up some truly surprising findings regarding the potential link between butter consumption and economic output in the Washington metro area. The remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9783201 suggests a relationship so strong, it might just butter your bread. Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9571103 indicates that changes in butter consumption explain a staggering 95.71% of the variability in economic output, leaving only a slim margin for doubt, much like scraping the last bits of butter from the wrapper.
The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 definitively spreads the notion that this relationship is not just a margarine of error, but a veritable slice of statistical truth. Our findings, while initially met with skepticism, have managed to pan out and reveal a robust connection that cannot be easily spread thin.
Despite the rich data we have churned through, it is important to note that correlation does not imply causation. While our results strongly support the notion that butter consumption may be associated with economic output in the Washington metro area, we must resist the temptation to jump to hasty conclusions and avoid being overly buttered up by our own findings.
This study opens the door to a whole new realm of research exploring the implications of butter consumption on economic dynamics. However, in the spirit of good humor, we dare say that further studies on this topic may cause a slippery slope into a quagmire of dairy-based economic theories, and it may be best to leave this particular field of research as rich and creamy as it is.
In the end, we believe that no further research is needed to prove the undeniable connection between butter consumption and economic output in the Washington metro area. Our findings have indeed spread a great deal of light on the matter, leaving us with a sense of buttery satisfaction. As the saying goes, the proof of the butter is in the pudding, or should we say, the pudding is in the proof of the butter?
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Spreading Wealth: The Butter-ly Effect on the Economic Churn in the Washington Metro Area. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
Journal of Economic Entomology
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Spreading Wealth: The Butter-ly Effect on the Economic Churn in the Washington Metro Area. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Institute for Dairy Economics and Butter Studies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Spreading Wealth: The Butter-ly Effect on the Economic Churn in the Washington Metro Area with an abstract of This study delves into the uncharted territory of butter consumption and its impact on the economic output of the Washington metro area. While the relationship between butter and economic productivity may initially seem outlandish, our findings unveil surprising connections that cannot be buttered up. Utilizing data from the USDA and Statista, we conducted a correlation analysis for the period of 2001 to 2021. The results reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9783201, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. Our analysis suggests that there may indeed be a link between butter consumption and economic output in the Washington metro area, offering food for thought in understanding the dairy dynamics of economic growth.
ChatGPT:
butter consumption, economic productivity, Washington metro area, USDA data, Statista, correlation analysis, economic output, dairy dynamics, butter consumption impact, economic churn
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Butter consumptionDetailed data title: Per capita consumption of Butter in the US
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with Butter consumption
Economic output of Washington metro area
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with Economic output of Washington metro area
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.9571103 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 95.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Economic output of Washington metro area) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Butter consumption) over the 21 years from 2001 through 2021.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.9E-14. 0.0000000000000187413418842728
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.98 in 1.9E-12% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 53,357,972,239,927 random variables You don't actually need 53 trillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 20 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 20 because we have two variables measured over a period of 21 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.95, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
| 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | |
| Butter consumption (Pounds per person) | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 5 | 5 | 4.9 | 5.4 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 5.5 | 5.6 | 5.7 | 5.7 | 6 | 6.2 | 6.3 | 6.5 |
| Economic output of Washington metro area (Dollars) | 2.6332E+14 | 2.793E+14 | 2.9692E+14 | 3.2231E+14 | 3.4736E+14 | 3.6526E+14 | 3.8305E+14 | 3.9744E+14 | 4.05E+14 | 4.2605E+14 | 4.3876E+14 | 4.4874E+14 | 4.558E+14 | 4.697E+14 | 4.8841E+14 | 5.0836E+14 | 5.2526E+14 | 5.4759E+14 | 5.6738E+14 | 5.6426E+14 | 6.075E+14 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4.3,4.4,4.5,4.5,4.5,4.7,4.7,5,5,4.9,5.4,5.5,5.5,5.5,5.6,5.7,5.7,6,6.2,6.3,6.5,])
array_2 = np.array([2.6332E+14,2.793E+14,2.9692E+14,3.2231E+14,3.4736E+14,3.6526E+14,3.8305E+14,3.9744E+14,4.05E+14,4.2605E+14,4.3876E+14,4.4874E+14,4.558E+14,4.697E+14,4.8841E+14,5.0836E+14,5.2526E+14,5.4759E+14,5.6738E+14,5.6426E+14,6.075E+14,])
array_1_name = "Butter consumption"
array_2_name = "Economic output of Washington metro area"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Butter consumption
- Line chart for only Economic output of Washington metro area
- The spurious research paper: Spreading Wealth: The Butter-ly Effect on the Economic Churn in the Washington Metro Area
Your dedication to rating warms my heart!
Correlation ID: 1172 · Black Variable ID: 557 · Red Variable ID: 166
