Report an error
Economic output of Washington metro area correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Inflation in the US | r=1 | 21yrs | No |
Butter consumption | r=0.98 | 21yrs | Yes! |
GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska | r=0.96 | 21yrs | No |
The distance between Saturn and the Sun | r=0.94 | 21yrs | No |
Electricity generation in Australia | r=0.94 | 21yrs | No |
Air quality in Grand Rapids, Michigan | r=0.8 | 21yrs | No |
Economic output of Washington metro area also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)