about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,139 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables and the second variable is McDonald's stock price (MCD).  The chart goes from 2002 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

As households spent more on fruits and vegetables, they started to feel healthier and more conscious of their food choices. This led to a decrease in fast food consumption, making people less likely to visit McDonald's. With fewer customers, McDonald's had to innovate and improve their menu by offering healthier options and revamping their marketing. This ultimately boosted their sales and investor confidence, causing an increase in McDonald's stock price. Who would've thought that kale and a rising stock price could be related?

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Data cyber art ] Generate an image where a graph on the left shows a steady increase in annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables. On the right, another graph depicts a decrease in McDonald's stock price (MCD). In the background, a McDonald's restaurant is seen undergoing renovations to offer healthier options. People are shown walking past, carrying bags of fresh produce and smiling as they make healthier food choices. The scene should be vibrant and futuristic, with a focus on the juxtaposition of healthier eating habits and business trends. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables and McDonald's stock price (MCD). Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cubism Woodblock painting Data cyber art A scene from Skyrim Minimalism
ChatGPT: Data cyber art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables and McDonald's stock price (MCD), in the following situation: As households spent more on fruits and vegetables, they started to feel healthier and more conscious of their food choices. This led to a decrease in fast food consumption, making people less likely to visit McDonald's. With fewer customers, McDonald's had to innovate and improve their menu by offering healthier options and revamping their marketing. This ultimately boosted their sales and investor confidence, causing an increase in McDonald's stock price. Who would've thought that kale and a rising stock price could be related?. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the scene, a graph shows a steady increase in annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables. Next to it, another graph depicts a decrease in McDonald's stock price (MCD). Meanwhile, in the background, a McDonald's restaurant is seen undergoing renovations to offer healthier options as people are shown walking past, carrying bags of fresh produce and smiling as they make healthier food choices.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Data cyber art ] and depicting this scene: In the scene, a graph shows a steady increase in annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables. Next to it, another graph depicts a decrease in McDonald's stock price (MCD). Meanwhile, in the background, a McDonald's restaurant is seen undergoing renovations to offer healthier options as people are shown walking past, carrying bags of fresh produce and smiling as they make healthier food choices. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Data cyber art ] Generate an image where a graph on the left shows a steady increase in annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables. On the right, another graph depicts a decrease in McDonald's stock price (MCD). In the background, a McDonald's restaurant is seen undergoing renovations to offer healthier options. People are shown walking past, carrying bags of fresh produce and smiling as they make healthier food choices. The scene should be vibrant and futuristic, with a focus on the juxtaposition of healthier eating habits and business trends.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables caused McDonald's stock price (MCD) to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Peeling Back the Layers: A Fruitful Study of the Relationship Between US Household Spending on Fruits and Vegetables and McDonald's Stock Price

Journal of Gastronomical Economics

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables and McDonald's stock price (MCD). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9856601 and p < 0.01 for 2002 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Peeling Back the Layers: A Fruitful Study of the Relationship Between US Household Spending on Fruits and Vegetables and McDonald's Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper examines the surprisingly juicy interplay between annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables and the stock price of McDonald's (MCD). Using a combination of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we conducted a thorough analysis from 2002 to 2022. Our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.9856601 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong connection between these seemingly unrelated factors. Our results add some zest to the field of finance and nutrition, shedding light on the unexpected influence of produce consumption on the fast-food industry. So, whether you're peeling bananas or peeling back stock market data, it seems that there may be more connections between fruits, veggies, and golden arches than initially meets the eye.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables and McDonald's stock price (MCD). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Peeling Back the Layers: A Fruitful Study of the Relationship Between US Household Spending on Fruits and Vegetables and McDonald's Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper examines the surprisingly juicy interplay between annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables and the stock price of McDonald's (MCD). Using a combination of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we conducted a thorough analysis from 2002 to 2022. Our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.9856601 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong connection between these seemingly unrelated factors. Our results add some zest to the field of finance and nutrition, shedding light on the unexpected influence of produce consumption on the fast-food industry. So, whether you're peeling bananas or peeling back stock market data, it seems that there may be more connections between fruits, veggies, and golden arches than initially meets the eye.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of finance and nutrition has long been a topic of interest, with researchers and analysts peeling back the layers of various factors to gain a better understanding of consumer behavior and market dynamics. In recent years, the focus on healthy eating and sustainable living has steered attention towards the consumption of fruits and vegetables, while the financial world continues to keep a watchful eye on the stock performance of industry giants such as McDonald's. Uniting these seemingly incongruent elements is the crux of our investigation, as we delve into the relationship between annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables and the stock price of McDonald's (MCD).

As researchers, we are accustomed to sowing the seeds of knowledge, harvesting data, and juicing out meaningful insights from statistical analyses. The interplay between consumer behavior and stock performance is often likened to a delicate dance, with each movement potentially influencing the other in a symphony of market dynamics. While the correlation between seemingly divergent factors may initially seem as unlikely as comparing apples to oranges, our findings suggest there may be more to this relationship than meets the eye.

What initially began as a speculative inquiry into the potential impact of produce consumption on the fast-food industry has metamorphosed into a compelling case of how stocks and stalks, markets and markets, and seeds and securities may intertwine in ways previously overlooked. Therefore, as we peel away the layers of this interplay, we aim not only to broaden our understanding of consumer choices and market trends but also to offer a refreshing perspective that adds some crunch to the traditional understanding of financial analysis.

Join us as we embark on this fruitful journey, dissecting the data with precision and seeking the ripest insights to shed light on the unexpected ties between fruits, veggies, and golden arches. After all, whether we're crunching numbers or crunching carrots, it's clear that the allure of financial analysis extends far beyond the traditional stock metrics, reminding us that in the garden of data, there may be more fruit for thought than we ever anticipated.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables and McDonald's stock price (MCD). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Peeling Back the Layers: A Fruitful Study of the Relationship Between US Household Spending on Fruits and Vegetables and McDonald's Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper examines the surprisingly juicy interplay between annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables and the stock price of McDonald's (MCD). Using a combination of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we conducted a thorough analysis from 2002 to 2022. Our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.9856601 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong connection between these seemingly unrelated factors. Our results add some zest to the field of finance and nutrition, shedding light on the unexpected influence of produce consumption on the fast-food industry. So, whether you're peeling bananas or peeling back stock market data, it seems that there may be more connections between fruits, veggies, and golden arches than initially meets the eye.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of finance and nutrition has long been a topic of interest, with researchers and analysts peeling back the layers of various factors to gain a better understanding of consumer behavior and market dynamics. In recent years, the focus on healthy eating and sustainable living has steered attention towards the consumption of fruits and vegetables, while the financial world continues to keep a watchful eye on the stock performance of industry giants such as McDonald's. Uniting these seemingly incongruent elements is the crux of our investigation, as we delve into the relationship between annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables and the stock price of McDonald's (MCD).
As researchers, we are accustomed to sowing the seeds of knowledge, harvesting data, and juicing out meaningful insights from statistical analyses. The interplay between consumer behavior and stock performance is often likened to a delicate dance, with each movement potentially influencing the other in a symphony of market dynamics. While the correlation between seemingly divergent factors may initially seem as unlikely as comparing apples to oranges, our findings suggest there may be more to this relationship than meets the eye.
What initially began as a speculative inquiry into the potential impact of produce consumption on the fast-food industry has metamorphosed into a compelling case of how stocks and stalks, markets and markets, and seeds and securities may intertwine in ways previously overlooked. Therefore, as we peel away the layers of this interplay, we aim not only to broaden our understanding of consumer choices and market trends but also to offer a refreshing perspective that adds some crunch to the traditional understanding of financial analysis.
Join us as we embark on this fruitful journey, dissecting the data with precision and seeking the ripest insights to shed light on the unexpected ties between fruits, veggies, and golden arches. After all, whether we're crunching numbers or crunching carrots, it's clear that the allure of financial analysis extends far beyond the traditional stock metrics, reminding us that in the garden of data, there may be more fruit for thought than we ever anticipated.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The initial groundwork for our investigation touches upon the work of Smith (2010) and Doe (2015), who, in their respective studies, explored the intricate relationship between consumer spending habits and stock performance within the context of the fast-food industry. Their analyses provide a solid foundation for our exploration, laying the fertile ground for our in-depth examination of the connection between the annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables and the stock price of McDonald's (MCD). However, while these studies bring forth valuable insights, our examination aims to add some zest and flavor to the existing literature, peeling back layers that have yet to be fully uncovered.

Moving beyond the conventional financial and economic perspectives, Jones (2018) introduces a novel approach to understanding market behavior through the lens of dietary patterns and public health. This innovative line of inquiry inspires our study, as we seek to intertwine the worlds of finance and nutrition in an unconventional manner, prompting a thorough exploration of the potential ripple effects stemming from increased household spending on fruits and vegetables.

In "Fruits and Veggies: A Financial Feast," Lorem and Ipsum (2020) draw attention to the evolving landscape of consumer preferences and the subsequent impact on the fast-food industry. Their examination delves into the nuances of dietary shifts and their implications on market trends, setting the stage for our investigation into the interconnectedness of produce consumption and the stock performance of McDonald's.

On a more whimsical note, the fictional works of "The Big Mac Mysteries" by Agatha Christie and "The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck" subtly weave themes of gastronomy and commerce, offering a playful parallel to our serious academic pursuits. These novels invite readers to ponder the multifaceted intersection between food choices and economic landscapes, reminding us that even in works of fiction, the bond between dietary habits and financial paradigms remains an intriguing area of contemplation.

Furthermore, our exploration is also informed by childhood influences, with cartoons such as "The Magic School Bus: Inside the Digestive System" and "VeggieTales" instilling in us an early curiosity about the intricate relationship between nutrition and societal dynamics. While these childhood favorites may seem lighthearted, they planted the seeds of curiosity that have blossomed into our rigorous academic inquiry, offering a reminder that sometimes the most unexpected sources contribute to our scholarly endeavors.

As we delve into the layers of existing literature, we are reminded of the timeless wisdom imparted by the Chiquita Banana jingle and the McDonald's jingle, serving as melodic reminders of the enduring impact of consumer culture on financial markets. These seemingly innocuous cultural markers underline the profound influence of branding and consumer choices on market performance, melding the worlds of finance and nutrition in an unexpected cacophony of influences.

In considering this diverse array of influences, it becomes apparent that the interplay between fruit and finance, vegetables and volatility, may yield insights that transcend the usual rhetoric of stock analyses. Therefore, armed with the collective wisdom of scholarly studies, fiction, pop culture, and childhood nostalgia, we embark on our quest to unravel the unexpected ties between produce consumption and the golden arches, adding some juiciness to the conversation surrounding financial analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables and McDonald's stock price (MCD). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2002 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Peeling Back the Layers: A Fruitful Study of the Relationship Between US Household Spending on Fruits and Vegetables and McDonald's Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper examines the surprisingly juicy interplay between annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables and the stock price of McDonald's (MCD). Using a combination of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we conducted a thorough analysis from 2002 to 2022. Our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.9856601 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong connection between these seemingly unrelated factors. Our results add some zest to the field of finance and nutrition, shedding light on the unexpected influence of produce consumption on the fast-food industry. So, whether you're peeling bananas or peeling back stock market data, it seems that there may be more connections between fruits, veggies, and golden arches than initially meets the eye.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of finance and nutrition has long been a topic of interest, with researchers and analysts peeling back the layers of various factors to gain a better understanding of consumer behavior and market dynamics. In recent years, the focus on healthy eating and sustainable living has steered attention towards the consumption of fruits and vegetables, while the financial world continues to keep a watchful eye on the stock performance of industry giants such as McDonald's. Uniting these seemingly incongruent elements is the crux of our investigation, as we delve into the relationship between annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables and the stock price of McDonald's (MCD).
As researchers, we are accustomed to sowing the seeds of knowledge, harvesting data, and juicing out meaningful insights from statistical analyses. The interplay between consumer behavior and stock performance is often likened to a delicate dance, with each movement potentially influencing the other in a symphony of market dynamics. While the correlation between seemingly divergent factors may initially seem as unlikely as comparing apples to oranges, our findings suggest there may be more to this relationship than meets the eye.
What initially began as a speculative inquiry into the potential impact of produce consumption on the fast-food industry has metamorphosed into a compelling case of how stocks and stalks, markets and markets, and seeds and securities may intertwine in ways previously overlooked. Therefore, as we peel away the layers of this interplay, we aim not only to broaden our understanding of consumer choices and market trends but also to offer a refreshing perspective that adds some crunch to the traditional understanding of financial analysis.
Join us as we embark on this fruitful journey, dissecting the data with precision and seeking the ripest insights to shed light on the unexpected ties between fruits, veggies, and golden arches. After all, whether we're crunching numbers or crunching carrots, it's clear that the allure of financial analysis extends far beyond the traditional stock metrics, reminding us that in the garden of data, there may be more fruit for thought than we ever anticipated.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To peel back the layers of the relationship between annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables and the stock price of McDonald's (MCD), we employed a mix of numerical analyses that were as refreshing as a chilled fruit salad on a scorching summer day. Data for annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables was collected from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, providing a bountiful harvest of information spanning the years 2002 to 2022. The stock price data for McDonald's (MCD) was obtained from LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), allowing us to crunch numbers that exhibited a level of flavor not commonly associated with financial data.

Our research team carefully handpicked statistical methods that had a certain zest to them, ensuring that our study would not only be rigorous but also ripe with analytical robustness. To examine the relationship between these seemingly incongruent variables, we first calculated the annual household spending on fruits and vegetables as a percentage of total annual household expenditure, creating a delectable index that reflected the fruity slice of consumer spending habits.

Next, we utilized robust statistical software to churn out a pear-fect correlation analysis, measuring the strength and direction of the relationship between annual household spending on fruits and vegetables and McDonald's stock price. The use of advanced regression analysis allowed us to sieve through the data for potential confounding factors and ensure that our findings were as crisp and clean as a freshly washed head of lettuce.

Moreover, to ensure that our findings were not mere banana skins standing in the way of drawing meaningful conclusions, we included a series of sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of our results across various time periods and market conditions. After all, we aimed to leave no stone unturned, no seed uneaten, and no curveball unpeeled in our quest to uncover the unexpected correlations in this deliciously intriguing relationship.

In addition to the substantial quantitative analyses, we also conducted a qualitative exploration of cultural and consumer trends, examining the evolving attitudes towards healthy eating and how these may influence the stock performance of fast-food chains. This holistic approach allowed us to garnish our findings with a nuanced understanding of the broader socioeconomic landscape.

Thus, armed with statistical prowess and a profound appreciation for the complexities of consumer behavior and market dynamics, our methodology baked together a mouthwatering mix of quantitative and qualitative techniques. By employing a diverse range of analytical tools and approaches, we aimed to serve up findings that not only satisfied the appetite for robust evidence but also left a tangy aftertaste of insight into the intertwined relationship between fruits, veggies, and the golden arches.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables and McDonald's stock price (MCD). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .

For the time period 2002 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9856601, r-squared of 0.9715258, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Peeling Back the Layers: A Fruitful Study of the Relationship Between US Household Spending on Fruits and Vegetables and McDonald's Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper examines the surprisingly juicy interplay between annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables and the stock price of McDonald's (MCD). Using a combination of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we conducted a thorough analysis from 2002 to 2022. Our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.9856601 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong connection between these seemingly unrelated factors. Our results add some zest to the field of finance and nutrition, shedding light on the unexpected influence of produce consumption on the fast-food industry. So, whether you're peeling bananas or peeling back stock market data, it seems that there may be more connections between fruits, veggies, and golden arches than initially meets the eye.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of finance and nutrition has long been a topic of interest, with researchers and analysts peeling back the layers of various factors to gain a better understanding of consumer behavior and market dynamics. In recent years, the focus on healthy eating and sustainable living has steered attention towards the consumption of fruits and vegetables, while the financial world continues to keep a watchful eye on the stock performance of industry giants such as McDonald's. Uniting these seemingly incongruent elements is the crux of our investigation, as we delve into the relationship between annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables and the stock price of McDonald's (MCD).
As researchers, we are accustomed to sowing the seeds of knowledge, harvesting data, and juicing out meaningful insights from statistical analyses. The interplay between consumer behavior and stock performance is often likened to a delicate dance, with each movement potentially influencing the other in a symphony of market dynamics. While the correlation between seemingly divergent factors may initially seem as unlikely as comparing apples to oranges, our findings suggest there may be more to this relationship than meets the eye.
What initially began as a speculative inquiry into the potential impact of produce consumption on the fast-food industry has metamorphosed into a compelling case of how stocks and stalks, markets and markets, and seeds and securities may intertwine in ways previously overlooked. Therefore, as we peel away the layers of this interplay, we aim not only to broaden our understanding of consumer choices and market trends but also to offer a refreshing perspective that adds some crunch to the traditional understanding of financial analysis.
Join us as we embark on this fruitful journey, dissecting the data with precision and seeking the ripest insights to shed light on the unexpected ties between fruits, veggies, and golden arches. After all, whether we're crunching numbers or crunching carrots, it's clear that the allure of financial analysis extends far beyond the traditional stock metrics, reminding us that in the garden of data, there may be more fruit for thought than we ever anticipated.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The findings of our research reveal a strikingly strong correlation between annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables and the stock price of McDonald's (MCD). Over the period from 2002 to 2022, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.9856601, indicating an almost "a-peeling" relationship between these two variables. Additionally, the r-squared value of 0.9715258 suggests that a whopping 97.15% of the variation in McDonald's stock price can be explained by changes in household spending on fruits and veggies. It's almost as if every dollar spent on apples and carrots had an uncanny influence on the value of those golden arches.

The connection between these seemingly unrelated factors is crystal clear, and the strength of the relationship is robust with a p-value less than 0.01, signifying that this strong correlation is not a mere statistical fluke. It's as if the financial market and the produce section of the supermarket have been sharing secrets, whispering implications, and exchanging significant glances behind our backs.

Our visual representation of this relationship, depicted in Fig. 1, shows a striking scatterplot of the data points forming a near-perfect linear relationship between annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables and McDonald's stock price. This striking visual depiction is bananas! It's a berry good reminder that the world of numbers and graphs can be just as fruitful and flavorful as a summer fruit salad.

Our results not only offer a fresh perspective on the dynamics of consumer spending and stock performance but also highlight the potential impact of healthy eating habits on the fast-food industry. It seems that healthy choices and investment portfolios may share more in common than one might initially expect. As we digest these findings, it's clear that the financial world isn't just about "dough," but also about the "lettuce" and the "greens."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables and McDonald's stock price (MCD). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Peeling Back the Layers: A Fruitful Study of the Relationship Between US Household Spending on Fruits and Vegetables and McDonald's Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper examines the surprisingly juicy interplay between annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables and the stock price of McDonald's (MCD). Using a combination of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we conducted a thorough analysis from 2002 to 2022. Our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.9856601 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong connection between these seemingly unrelated factors. Our results add some zest to the field of finance and nutrition, shedding light on the unexpected influence of produce consumption on the fast-food industry. So, whether you're peeling bananas or peeling back stock market data, it seems that there may be more connections between fruits, veggies, and golden arches than initially meets the eye.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The initial groundwork for our investigation touches upon the work of Smith (2010) and Doe (2015), who, in their respective studies, explored the intricate relationship between consumer spending habits and stock performance within the context of the fast-food industry. Their analyses provide a solid foundation for our exploration, laying the fertile ground for our in-depth examination of the connection between the annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables and the stock price of McDonald's (MCD). However, while these studies bring forth valuable insights, our examination aims to add some zest and flavor to the existing literature, peeling back layers that have yet to be fully uncovered.
Moving beyond the conventional financial and economic perspectives, Jones (2018) introduces a novel approach to understanding market behavior through the lens of dietary patterns and public health. This innovative line of inquiry inspires our study, as we seek to intertwine the worlds of finance and nutrition in an unconventional manner, prompting a thorough exploration of the potential ripple effects stemming from increased household spending on fruits and vegetables.
In "Fruits and Veggies: A Financial Feast," Lorem and Ipsum (2020) draw attention to the evolving landscape of consumer preferences and the subsequent impact on the fast-food industry. Their examination delves into the nuances of dietary shifts and their implications on market trends, setting the stage for our investigation into the interconnectedness of produce consumption and the stock performance of McDonald's.
On a more whimsical note, the fictional works of "The Big Mac Mysteries" by Agatha Christie and "The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck" subtly weave themes of gastronomy and commerce, offering a playful parallel to our serious academic pursuits. These novels invite readers to ponder the multifaceted intersection between food choices and economic landscapes, reminding us that even in works of fiction, the bond between dietary habits and financial paradigms remains an intriguing area of contemplation.
Furthermore, our exploration is also informed by childhood influences, with cartoons such as "The Magic School Bus: Inside the Digestive System" and "VeggieTales" instilling in us an early curiosity about the intricate relationship between nutrition and societal dynamics. While these childhood favorites may seem lighthearted, they planted the seeds of curiosity that have blossomed into our rigorous academic inquiry, offering a reminder that sometimes the most unexpected sources contribute to our scholarly endeavors.
As we delve into the layers of existing literature, we are reminded of the timeless wisdom imparted by the Chiquita Banana jingle and the McDonald's jingle, serving as melodic reminders of the enduring impact of consumer culture on financial markets. These seemingly innocuous cultural markers underline the profound influence of branding and consumer choices on market performance, melding the worlds of finance and nutrition in an unexpected cacophony of influences.
In considering this diverse array of influences, it becomes apparent that the interplay between fruit and finance, vegetables and volatility, may yield insights that transcend the usual rhetoric of stock analyses. Therefore, armed with the collective wisdom of scholarly studies, fiction, pop culture, and childhood nostalgia, we embark on our quest to unravel the unexpected ties between produce consumption and the golden arches, adding some juiciness to the conversation surrounding financial analysis.

[[RESULTS]]
The findings of our research reveal a strikingly strong correlation between annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables and the stock price of McDonald's (MCD). Over the period from 2002 to 2022, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.9856601, indicating an almost "a-peeling" relationship between these two variables. Additionally, the r-squared value of 0.9715258 suggests that a whopping 97.15% of the variation in McDonald's stock price can be explained by changes in household spending on fruits and veggies. It's almost as if every dollar spent on apples and carrots had an uncanny influence on the value of those golden arches.
The connection between these seemingly unrelated factors is crystal clear, and the strength of the relationship is robust with a p-value less than 0.01, signifying that this strong correlation is not a mere statistical fluke. It's as if the financial market and the produce section of the supermarket have been sharing secrets, whispering implications, and exchanging significant glances behind our backs.
Our visual representation of this relationship, depicted in Fig. 1, shows a striking scatterplot of the data points forming a near-perfect linear relationship between annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables and McDonald's stock price. This striking visual depiction is bananas! It's a berry good reminder that the world of numbers and graphs can be just as fruitful and flavorful as a summer fruit salad.
Our results not only offer a fresh perspective on the dynamics of consumer spending and stock performance but also highlight the potential impact of healthy eating habits on the fast-food industry. It seems that healthy choices and investment portfolios may share more in common than one might initially expect. As we digest these findings, it's clear that the financial world isn't just about "dough," but also about the "lettuce" and the "greens."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings not only add a juicy layer to the existing literature on consumer spending and stock performance but also serve as a fruitful reminder of the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate elements. The "a-peeling" relationship between annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables and the stock price of McDonald's (MCD) aligns with previous research by Smith and Doe, emphasizing the far-reaching impact of consumer behavior on the financial world. Much like a well-balanced fruit salad, our study blends these fields together, effectively demonstrating the significant influence of produce consumption on the fast-food industry's market dynamics.

The robust correlation coefficient and high r-squared value observed in our analysis coincides with the "fruitful feast" theory postulated by Lorem and Ipsum, underscoring the potential ripple effects of dietary shifts on market trends. It appears that the financial market and the produce section of the supermarket have been sharing more than just shelf space, as our results support the notion that increased household spending on fruits and vegetables may indeed have a notable impact on the performance of McDonald's stock. It's as if every apple and carrot purchase carries its weight in golden arches' stock price, reminding us that finance isn't just about numbers; it's also about the crunch of fresh produce.

Furthermore, the strong correlation highlighted in our study resonates with the themes presented in fictional works such as "The Big Mac Mysteries" and "The Grapes of Wrath," where gastronomy and commerce intertwine in unexpected ways. The enduring cultural markers represented by the Chiquita Banana and McDonald's jingles mirror the profound influence of consumer preferences on market performance, enriching our understanding of the multifaceted relationship between dietary habits and financial paradigms. In essence, our findings resonate with these offbeat influences, shedding light on the intricate and often whimsical connections between fruit, veggies, and stock prices.

Our results contribute to a broader comprehension of the complex factors at play in market dynamics, emphasizing that the financial world isn't just about "dough"; it's about the "lettuce" and the "greens" too. As we peel back the layers of this tantalizing relationship, we encourage further exploration into the unexpected connections that hide beneath the surface of conventional economic analyses. After all, the financial market and fruit baskets may have more in common than initially meets the eye, reminding us that a deeper understanding of these relationships is indeed a fruitful endeavor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables and McDonald's stock price (MCD). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Peeling Back the Layers: A Fruitful Study of the Relationship Between US Household Spending on Fruits and Vegetables and McDonald's Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper examines the surprisingly juicy interplay between annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables and the stock price of McDonald's (MCD). Using a combination of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we conducted a thorough analysis from 2002 to 2022. Our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.9856601 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong connection between these seemingly unrelated factors. Our results add some zest to the field of finance and nutrition, shedding light on the unexpected influence of produce consumption on the fast-food industry. So, whether you're peeling bananas or peeling back stock market data, it seems that there may be more connections between fruits, veggies, and golden arches than initially meets the eye.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of finance and nutrition has long been a topic of interest, with researchers and analysts peeling back the layers of various factors to gain a better understanding of consumer behavior and market dynamics. In recent years, the focus on healthy eating and sustainable living has steered attention towards the consumption of fruits and vegetables, while the financial world continues to keep a watchful eye on the stock performance of industry giants such as McDonald's. Uniting these seemingly incongruent elements is the crux of our investigation, as we delve into the relationship between annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables and the stock price of McDonald's (MCD).
As researchers, we are accustomed to sowing the seeds of knowledge, harvesting data, and juicing out meaningful insights from statistical analyses. The interplay between consumer behavior and stock performance is often likened to a delicate dance, with each movement potentially influencing the other in a symphony of market dynamics. While the correlation between seemingly divergent factors may initially seem as unlikely as comparing apples to oranges, our findings suggest there may be more to this relationship than meets the eye.
What initially began as a speculative inquiry into the potential impact of produce consumption on the fast-food industry has metamorphosed into a compelling case of how stocks and stalks, markets and markets, and seeds and securities may intertwine in ways previously overlooked. Therefore, as we peel away the layers of this interplay, we aim not only to broaden our understanding of consumer choices and market trends but also to offer a refreshing perspective that adds some crunch to the traditional understanding of financial analysis.
Join us as we embark on this fruitful journey, dissecting the data with precision and seeking the ripest insights to shed light on the unexpected ties between fruits, veggies, and golden arches. After all, whether we're crunching numbers or crunching carrots, it's clear that the allure of financial analysis extends far beyond the traditional stock metrics, reminding us that in the garden of data, there may be more fruit for thought than we ever anticipated.

[[RESULTS]]
The findings of our research reveal a strikingly strong correlation between annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables and the stock price of McDonald's (MCD). Over the period from 2002 to 2022, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.9856601, indicating an almost "a-peeling" relationship between these two variables. Additionally, the r-squared value of 0.9715258 suggests that a whopping 97.15% of the variation in McDonald's stock price can be explained by changes in household spending on fruits and veggies. It's almost as if every dollar spent on apples and carrots had an uncanny influence on the value of those golden arches.
The connection between these seemingly unrelated factors is crystal clear, and the strength of the relationship is robust with a p-value less than 0.01, signifying that this strong correlation is not a mere statistical fluke. It's as if the financial market and the produce section of the supermarket have been sharing secrets, whispering implications, and exchanging significant glances behind our backs.
Our visual representation of this relationship, depicted in Fig. 1, shows a striking scatterplot of the data points forming a near-perfect linear relationship between annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables and McDonald's stock price. This striking visual depiction is bananas! It's a berry good reminder that the world of numbers and graphs can be just as fruitful and flavorful as a summer fruit salad.
Our results not only offer a fresh perspective on the dynamics of consumer spending and stock performance but also highlight the potential impact of healthy eating habits on the fast-food industry. It seems that healthy choices and investment portfolios may share more in common than one might initially expect. As we digest these findings, it's clear that the financial world isn't just about "dough," but also about the "lettuce" and the "greens."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has peeled back the layers of the relationship between annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables and the stock price of McDonald's (MCD) to reveal a surprisingly robust correlation. Our findings underscore the undeniable connection between consumers crunching on carrots and the well-being of those golden arches. The "a-peeling" correlation coefficient and r-squared value have left us with a fruit salad of insights, showcasing the influence of healthy eating habits on the ever-fluctuating realm of stock prices. It seems that whether you're tossing a salad or analyzing stock market data, there's more to the financial world than meets the eye, and as of now, no further research is needed in this area. We've certainly had our fill of the fruitful connection between fruits, veggies, and the fast-food industry!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Peeling Back the Layers: A Fruitful Study of the Relationship Between US Household Spending on Fruits and Vegetables and McDonald's Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Gastronomical Economics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Peeling Back the Layers: A Fruitful Study of the Relationship Between US Household Spending on Fruits and Vegetables and McDonald's Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Nutrition and Financial Markets Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Peeling Back the Layers: A Fruitful Study of the Relationship Between US Household Spending on Fruits and Vegetables and McDonald's Stock Price with an abstract of This research paper examines the surprisingly juicy interplay between annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables and the stock price of McDonald's (MCD). Using a combination of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we conducted a thorough analysis from 2002 to 2022. Our findings reveal a significant correlation coefficient of 0.9856601 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong connection between these seemingly unrelated factors. Our results add some zest to the field of finance and nutrition, shedding light on the unexpected influence of produce consumption on the fast-food industry. So, whether you're peeling bananas or peeling back stock market data, it seems that there may be more connections between fruits, veggies, and golden arches than initially meets the eye.

ChatGPT:

US household spending, fruits and vegetables, McDonald's stock price, correlation coefficient, Bureau of Labor Statistics, LSEG Analytics, Refinitiv, finance and nutrition, produce consumption, fast-food industry, stock market data, connections between fruits and vegetables, golden arches

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables
Detailed data title: Average annual household spend on fruits and vegetables
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
See what else correlates with Annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables

McDonald's stock price (MCD)
Detailed data title: Opening price of McDonald's (MCD) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function

See what else correlates with McDonald's stock price (MCD)

Correlation r = 0.9856601 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9715258 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 97.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., McDonald's stock price (MCD)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables) over the 21 years from 2002 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.8E-16. 0.0000000000000003800218468550
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.99 in 3.8E-14% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,631,427,662,056,379 random variables You don't actually need 2 quadrillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 20 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 20 because we have two variables measured over a period of 21 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.96, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables (Household spend)55253556155259260065765667971573175175676978383785887697710331099
McDonald's stock price (MCD) (Stock price)26.4716.1724.9531.634.2943.6559.4862.3862.6377.1101.3389.496.8194.13117.25121.86173.73175.41198214.49269.49




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([552,535,561,552,592,600,657,656,679,715,731,751,756,769,783,837,858,876,977,1033,1099,])
array_2 = np.array([26.47,16.17,24.95,31.6,34.29,43.65,59.48,62.38,62.63,77.1,101.33,89.4,96.81,94.13,117.25,121.86,173.73,175.41,198,214.49,269.49,])
array_1_name = "Annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables"
array_2_name = "McDonald's stock price (MCD)"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're a rater extraordinaire!


Correlation ID: 4139 · Black Variable ID: 19896 · Red Variable ID: 1576
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0