Report an error
Annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| McDonald's stock price (MCD) | r=0.99 | 21yrs | Yes! |
| Renewable energy production in United States | r=0.98 | 22yrs | No |
| Number of households headed by single fathers in the United States | r=0.96 | 22yrs | No |
| Fossil fuel use in India | r=0.96 | 22yrs | No |
| SAP SE's stock price (SAP) | r=0.96 | 21yrs | No |
| The Southern Company's stock price (SO) | r=0.96 | 21yrs | No |
| Caterpillar's stock price (CAT) | r=0.95 | 21yrs | No |
| Lululemon's stock price (LULU) | r=0.95 | 15yrs | No |
| Emerson Electric Co.'s stock price (EMR) | r=0.93 | 21yrs | Yes! |
| Air quality in Boston | r=0.9 | 23yrs | No |
| Chipotle Mexican Grill's stock price (CMG) | r=0.9 | 16yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on fruits and vegetables also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)