about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,410 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Butter consumption and the second variable is BlackRock's stock price (BLK).  The chart goes from 2002 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As butter consumption increased, so did the demand for baked goods. This led to a spike in happiness levels, prompting people to make impulsive but strangely successful investments in BlackRock, ultimately driving up the stock price. Who knew that spreading the love for butter could churn out such unexpected financial prosperity for BlackRock shareholders? Remember, the bread might be the real dough-maker, but butter seemingly has a knack for turning stock portfolios into a spread worth savoring.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a bustling kitchen scene where people are spreading generous amounts of butter on freshly baked bread and muffins. The butter is melting and creating a tempting aroma that fills the air. Next to it, overlay an image of a busy stock exchange where the BlackRock's stock price ticker rises steadily. In the background, morph a melting plastic bottle into the BlackRock logo, depicting the shift in investor focus towards sustainable investments. The imagery should be vivid and visually captivating. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Butter consumption and BlackRock's stock price (BLK). Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Realistic Pop art Photorealism a funny image macro Art nouveau
ChatGPT: a funny image macro

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Butter consumption and BlackRock's stock price (BLK), in the following situation: Because with more people eating butter, there's less margarine consumption, leading to a decrease in demand for synthetic oils, which are used in the production of plastics, pushing investors towards more sustainable investments like BlackRock.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling kitchen, people are spreading generous amounts of butter on freshly baked bread and muffins. The butter is melting and creating a tempting aroma that fills the air. Meanwhile, in a busy stock exchange, the BlackRock's stock price ticker rises steadily as investors shift their focus towards sustainable investments, with the image of a melting plastic bottle morphing into the BlackRock logo.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a funny image macro ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling kitchen, people are spreading generous amounts of butter on freshly baked bread and muffins. The butter is melting and creating a tempting aroma that fills the air. Meanwhile, in a busy stock exchange, the BlackRock's stock price ticker rises steadily as investors shift their focus towards sustainable investments, with the image of a melting plastic bottle morphing into the BlackRock logo. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a bustling kitchen scene where people are spreading generous amounts of butter on freshly baked bread and muffins. The butter is melting and creating a tempting aroma that fills the air. Next to it, overlay an image of a busy stock exchange where the BlackRock's stock price ticker rises steadily. In the background, morph a melting plastic bottle into the BlackRock logo, depicting the shift in investor focus towards sustainable investments. The imagery should be vivid and visually captivating.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Butter consumption caused BlackRock's stock price (BLK) to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Butter and BlackRock: A Budding Bromance?

The Journal of Financial Affairs and Dairy Relations

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and BlackRock's stock price (BLK). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9238025 and p < 0.01 for 2002 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Butter and BlackRock: A Budding Bromance?

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the unlikely partnership between butter consumption and the stock price of BlackRock (BLK), the world's largest asset management firm. With utmost seriousness and a hint of skepticism, we examined the data from the USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) from the period of 2002 to 2021 to unravel the seemingly absurd correlation between these two variables. Our findings revealed a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9238025 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a robust relationship between butter and BlackRock’s stock price. Our results beckon further investigation into the "spread" of financial influences and the "buttering up" of the market. We hope this study serves as a friendly reminder to always consider the "butterfly effect" in financial research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and BlackRock's stock price (BLK). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Butter and BlackRock: A Budding Bromance?

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the unlikely partnership between butter consumption and the stock price of BlackRock (BLK), the world's largest asset management firm. With utmost seriousness and a hint of skepticism, we examined the data from the USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) from the period of 2002 to 2021 to unravel the seemingly absurd correlation between these two variables. Our findings revealed a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9238025 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a robust relationship between butter and BlackRock’s stock price. Our results beckon further investigation into the "spread" of financial influences and the "buttering up" of the market. We hope this study serves as a friendly reminder to always consider the "butterfly effect" in financial research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the realm of financial analysis, the pursuit of uncovering unexpected relationships between disparate variables can yield fascinating insights. It is within this spirit of inquiry that we turn our attention to the apparent association between butter consumption and the stock price of BlackRock (BLK). On the surface, this correlation may seem as incongruous as a lactose-intolerant cow, but as we embark on this curious journey, we are reminded of the words of Louis Pasteur: "In the field of observation, chance favors only the prepared mind." With a touch of whimsy and a dash of skepticism, let us delve into the uncharted territory where margarine meets market analysis.

The butter market, not typically associated with high finance, and the stock price of BlackRock, an emblem of global asset management, seem an unlikely pair. However, as we saunter into the realm of statistical analysis, armed with butter knives and line graphs, we cannot help but ponder the richness of the relationship lurking beneath the surface. The trivialities of existence often unfold in the most unexpected facets of life, akin to a statistical regression's uncanny ability to unveil hidden patterns.

As we savored the data compiled by the USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) from 2002 to 2021, it became apparent that the numbers were churning, much like butter in a churn. Amidst the spreadsheets and the spreads, a correlation coefficient of 0.9238025 emerged, enrapturing our senses with the allure of improbable connections. The statistical significance of our findings, with a p-value of less than 0.01, beckoned us to contemplate the profound implications of this unanticipated intertwining of butter consumption and the movements of BlackRock's stock price.

This study represents a cautious foray into the quirky confluence of butter and finance, a veritable odd couple thrust into the limelight of statistical scrutiny. Our findings, while undeniably eyebrow-raising, urge us to approach the intricate dance of market dynamics with open minds and a readiness to embrace the unexpected. It is our hope that this research, albeit an unconventional romp through the annals of financial analysis, serves as a gentle nudge to engage in whimsical contemplation of the often unforeseen "buttery" influences permeating the vast landscape of market forces. After all, what is research if not an intrepid exploration of the "butterfly effect" in the complex tapestry of statistical revelations?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and BlackRock's stock price (BLK). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Butter and BlackRock: A Budding Bromance?

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the unlikely partnership between butter consumption and the stock price of BlackRock (BLK), the world's largest asset management firm. With utmost seriousness and a hint of skepticism, we examined the data from the USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) from the period of 2002 to 2021 to unravel the seemingly absurd correlation between these two variables. Our findings revealed a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9238025 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a robust relationship between butter and BlackRock’s stock price. Our results beckon further investigation into the "spread" of financial influences and the "buttering up" of the market. We hope this study serves as a friendly reminder to always consider the "butterfly effect" in financial research.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of financial analysis, the pursuit of uncovering unexpected relationships between disparate variables can yield fascinating insights. It is within this spirit of inquiry that we turn our attention to the apparent association between butter consumption and the stock price of BlackRock (BLK). On the surface, this correlation may seem as incongruous as a lactose-intolerant cow, but as we embark on this curious journey, we are reminded of the words of Louis Pasteur: "In the field of observation, chance favors only the prepared mind." With a touch of whimsy and a dash of skepticism, let us delve into the uncharted territory where margarine meets market analysis.
The butter market, not typically associated with high finance, and the stock price of BlackRock, an emblem of global asset management, seem an unlikely pair. However, as we saunter into the realm of statistical analysis, armed with butter knives and line graphs, we cannot help but ponder the richness of the relationship lurking beneath the surface. The trivialities of existence often unfold in the most unexpected facets of life, akin to a statistical regression's uncanny ability to unveil hidden patterns.
As we savored the data compiled by the USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) from 2002 to 2021, it became apparent that the numbers were churning, much like butter in a churn. Amidst the spreadsheets and the spreads, a correlation coefficient of 0.9238025 emerged, enrapturing our senses with the allure of improbable connections. The statistical significance of our findings, with a p-value of less than 0.01, beckoned us to contemplate the profound implications of this unanticipated intertwining of butter consumption and the movements of BlackRock's stock price.
This study represents a cautious foray into the quirky confluence of butter and finance, a veritable odd couple thrust into the limelight of statistical scrutiny. Our findings, while undeniably eyebrow-raising, urge us to approach the intricate dance of market dynamics with open minds and a readiness to embrace the unexpected. It is our hope that this research, albeit an unconventional romp through the annals of financial analysis, serves as a gentle nudge to engage in whimsical contemplation of the often unforeseen "buttery" influences permeating the vast landscape of market forces. After all, what is research if not an intrepid exploration of the "butterfly effect" in the complex tapestry of statistical revelations?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In the vast expanse of scholarly literature, the intersection of butter consumption and stock prices intersects a web of eccentric and unexpected discourses. Initially, the correlation seems as enigmatic as a Rubik's Cube submerged in a tub of margarine. However, as we wade through the murky waters of financial analysis, we encounter enlightening perspectives that lend themselves to a rich tapestry of inquiry unlike any other.

Smith et al. (2018) examined the socioeconomic factors influencing dietary habits and stumbled upon an intriguing anomaly. Their findings suggested a peculiar uptick in butter consumption coinciding with periods of bullish activity in the stock market. While their study's ostensible focus was on dietary trends, the authors couldn't help but toast to the remarkable synchronicity between buttery indulgence and financial exuberance.

Doe and Jones (2020) expounded upon the ripple effects of consumer behavior on market dynamics, with a particular emphasis on seemingly unrelated products. Their work notably delved into the uncharted territory where spreadsheets and spreads collide, portraying the interplay of consumer sentiment and stock price movements. Amidst their discourse on consumer psychology, the authors inadvertently churned out intriguing observations regarding the uncanny convergence of butter consumption and stock market gyrations.

Turning to the realm of non-fiction literature, "The Economics of Butter" by John Smithwick provides a comprehensive overview of global butter production, consumption patterns, and market influences. While the book doesn't explicitly touch upon the financial sphere, its nuanced exploration of butter's economic reverberations offers a compelling backdrop for understanding the seemingly inexplicable relationship between butter and BlackRock's stock price.

Likewise, "Butter: A Cultural History" by Elaine Khosrova delves into the multifaceted facets of butter, ranging from its culinary significance to its historical implications. While not inherently tied to financial analyses, the book's insightful portrayal of butter's pervasive influence in various domains inadvertently invites contemplation on its potential impact on market forces and stock prices.

Shifting gears to the world of fiction, "Spread Thin: A Financial Fable" by A. Hedgefund whimsically weaves a tale of intrigue and whimsy centered around a mystical butter churn that mysteriously influences the stock prices of fictitious conglomerates. While the narrative may be more whimsical than scholarly, it embodies the underlying sentiment driving our earnest pursuit of uncovering the mysterious rapport between butter consumption and BlackRock's stock price.

Furthermore, social media chatter has provided anecdotal accounts of individuals correlating their butter-buying habits with stock market movements, albeit in jest. A post by @FinancialFoodie on Twitter humorously elucidates, "Buy butter to butter up your portfolio – it's the toast of Wall Street!" While such musings may be lighthearted quips, they underscore the pervasive allure of linking everyday choices to financial outcomes, inadvertently shining a comically earnest light on our study's peculiar subject matter.

In the wake of these diverse literary and anecdotal sources, our investigation steers into uncharted territory, guided by the whimsy of unlikely correlations and the earnest pursuit of unraveling the "butterfly effect" in the enigmatic world of financial analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and BlackRock's stock price (BLK). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2002 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Butter and BlackRock: A Budding Bromance?

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the unlikely partnership between butter consumption and the stock price of BlackRock (BLK), the world's largest asset management firm. With utmost seriousness and a hint of skepticism, we examined the data from the USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) from the period of 2002 to 2021 to unravel the seemingly absurd correlation between these two variables. Our findings revealed a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9238025 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a robust relationship between butter and BlackRock’s stock price. Our results beckon further investigation into the "spread" of financial influences and the "buttering up" of the market. We hope this study serves as a friendly reminder to always consider the "butterfly effect" in financial research.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of financial analysis, the pursuit of uncovering unexpected relationships between disparate variables can yield fascinating insights. It is within this spirit of inquiry that we turn our attention to the apparent association between butter consumption and the stock price of BlackRock (BLK). On the surface, this correlation may seem as incongruous as a lactose-intolerant cow, but as we embark on this curious journey, we are reminded of the words of Louis Pasteur: "In the field of observation, chance favors only the prepared mind." With a touch of whimsy and a dash of skepticism, let us delve into the uncharted territory where margarine meets market analysis.
The butter market, not typically associated with high finance, and the stock price of BlackRock, an emblem of global asset management, seem an unlikely pair. However, as we saunter into the realm of statistical analysis, armed with butter knives and line graphs, we cannot help but ponder the richness of the relationship lurking beneath the surface. The trivialities of existence often unfold in the most unexpected facets of life, akin to a statistical regression's uncanny ability to unveil hidden patterns.
As we savored the data compiled by the USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) from 2002 to 2021, it became apparent that the numbers were churning, much like butter in a churn. Amidst the spreadsheets and the spreads, a correlation coefficient of 0.9238025 emerged, enrapturing our senses with the allure of improbable connections. The statistical significance of our findings, with a p-value of less than 0.01, beckoned us to contemplate the profound implications of this unanticipated intertwining of butter consumption and the movements of BlackRock's stock price.
This study represents a cautious foray into the quirky confluence of butter and finance, a veritable odd couple thrust into the limelight of statistical scrutiny. Our findings, while undeniably eyebrow-raising, urge us to approach the intricate dance of market dynamics with open minds and a readiness to embrace the unexpected. It is our hope that this research, albeit an unconventional romp through the annals of financial analysis, serves as a gentle nudge to engage in whimsical contemplation of the often unforeseen "buttery" influences permeating the vast landscape of market forces. After all, what is research if not an intrepid exploration of the "butterfly effect" in the complex tapestry of statistical revelations?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To uncover the enigmatic relationship between butter consumption and BlackRock's stock price, our research team embarked on a whimsical yet rigorous journey into the world of statistical analysis. With a twinkle in our eyes and an unrelenting pursuit of scholarly investigation, we employed an assortment of data collection and analytical methods that would make even the most stoic of statisticians crack a smile.

First and foremost, we scoured the depths of the internet, traversing through an array of datasets and financial reports like brave explorers seeking treasure in uncharted territory. Our quest eventually led us to the treasure troves of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the esteemed LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), where we unearthed a bounty of delectable data on butter consumption and the fluctuations of BlackRock's stock price from the year 2002 to 2021.

As we ventured into the peculiar domain of statistical analysis, we dappled our methodology with a concoction of quantitative techniques that could rival the complexity of a molecular gastronomy recipe. We meticulously calculated the correlation coefficient between butter consumption and BlackRock's stock price, utilizing a mathematical alchemy that would make Gauss himself nod in approval. Our statistical arsenal also featured the formidable p-value, brandished with a flourish to measure the significance of the unearthed correlation – a test as crucial to our inquiry as a sous chef taste-testing a béchamel sauce.

The olfactory essence of our findings permeated the air as our data danced across the spreadsheets like butter on a sizzling griddle. We swiftly identified a correlation coefficient of 0.9238025, a number that felt as euphoric as discovering a perfectly ripe avocado in a sea of unripened fruits. Tucked beneath this tantalizing coefficient lay a p-value of less than 0.01, signaling to us that this apparent dalliance between butter consumption and BlackRock's stock price was not merely a statistical fling but a bonafide relationship demanding contemplation.

As we reflect upon the labyrinthine twists and turns of our research methodology, our hearts swell with the certainty that our analytical odyssey has not only shed light on this curious correlation but has also infused the austere halls of financial analysis with a dash of whimsy and an unmistakable aroma of freshly churned butter.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and BlackRock's stock price (BLK). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .

For the time period 2002 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9238025, r-squared of 0.8534111, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Butter and BlackRock: A Budding Bromance?

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the unlikely partnership between butter consumption and the stock price of BlackRock (BLK), the world's largest asset management firm. With utmost seriousness and a hint of skepticism, we examined the data from the USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) from the period of 2002 to 2021 to unravel the seemingly absurd correlation between these two variables. Our findings revealed a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9238025 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a robust relationship between butter and BlackRock’s stock price. Our results beckon further investigation into the "spread" of financial influences and the "buttering up" of the market. We hope this study serves as a friendly reminder to always consider the "butterfly effect" in financial research.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the realm of financial analysis, the pursuit of uncovering unexpected relationships between disparate variables can yield fascinating insights. It is within this spirit of inquiry that we turn our attention to the apparent association between butter consumption and the stock price of BlackRock (BLK). On the surface, this correlation may seem as incongruous as a lactose-intolerant cow, but as we embark on this curious journey, we are reminded of the words of Louis Pasteur: "In the field of observation, chance favors only the prepared mind." With a touch of whimsy and a dash of skepticism, let us delve into the uncharted territory where margarine meets market analysis.
The butter market, not typically associated with high finance, and the stock price of BlackRock, an emblem of global asset management, seem an unlikely pair. However, as we saunter into the realm of statistical analysis, armed with butter knives and line graphs, we cannot help but ponder the richness of the relationship lurking beneath the surface. The trivialities of existence often unfold in the most unexpected facets of life, akin to a statistical regression's uncanny ability to unveil hidden patterns.
As we savored the data compiled by the USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) from 2002 to 2021, it became apparent that the numbers were churning, much like butter in a churn. Amidst the spreadsheets and the spreads, a correlation coefficient of 0.9238025 emerged, enrapturing our senses with the allure of improbable connections. The statistical significance of our findings, with a p-value of less than 0.01, beckoned us to contemplate the profound implications of this unanticipated intertwining of butter consumption and the movements of BlackRock's stock price.
This study represents a cautious foray into the quirky confluence of butter and finance, a veritable odd couple thrust into the limelight of statistical scrutiny. Our findings, while undeniably eyebrow-raising, urge us to approach the intricate dance of market dynamics with open minds and a readiness to embrace the unexpected. It is our hope that this research, albeit an unconventional romp through the annals of financial analysis, serves as a gentle nudge to engage in whimsical contemplation of the often unforeseen "buttery" influences permeating the vast landscape of market forces. After all, what is research if not an intrepid exploration of the "butterfly effect" in the complex tapestry of statistical revelations?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The quantitative analysis of the relationship between butter consumption and BlackRock's stock price yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9238025, indicative of a strong positive relationship between the two variables. This surprising finding suggests that as butter consumption increased, so did the stock price of BlackRock. Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was calculated to be 0.8534111, signifying that approximately 85.34% of the variation in BlackRock's stock price could be explained by changes in butter consumption. The statistical significance of this correlation was confirmed, with a p-value of less than 0.01, reinforcing the robustness of the observed relationship.

Figure 1, a scatterplot representing the association between butter consumption and BlackRock's stock price, vividly illustrates the compelling correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables. The scatterplot illuminates the upward trend, affirming the synchronous movements of butter consumption and BlackRock's stock price over the evaluated period.

This unexpected correlation, despite its initial incredulity, underscores the idiosyncrasies of financial markets and the mercurial nature of consumer behavior. The significant relationship discovered in this investigation invites a deeper exploration of the intricate mechanisms driving market dynamics and emphasizes the need to scrutinize seemingly unrelated factors in financial analysis. Our results prompt a reconsideration of conventional wisdom and an appreciation for the unanticipated interplay of diverse influences on market performance. As we churn through the implications of this peculiar correlation, we are reminded that in the world of finance, even the most unexpected pairings can reveal insights as rich and complex as a decadent buttery spread.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and BlackRock's stock price (BLK). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Butter and BlackRock: A Budding Bromance?

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the unlikely partnership between butter consumption and the stock price of BlackRock (BLK), the world's largest asset management firm. With utmost seriousness and a hint of skepticism, we examined the data from the USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) from the period of 2002 to 2021 to unravel the seemingly absurd correlation between these two variables. Our findings revealed a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9238025 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a robust relationship between butter and BlackRock’s stock price. Our results beckon further investigation into the "spread" of financial influences and the "buttering up" of the market. We hope this study serves as a friendly reminder to always consider the "butterfly effect" in financial research.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In the vast expanse of scholarly literature, the intersection of butter consumption and stock prices intersects a web of eccentric and unexpected discourses. Initially, the correlation seems as enigmatic as a Rubik's Cube submerged in a tub of margarine. However, as we wade through the murky waters of financial analysis, we encounter enlightening perspectives that lend themselves to a rich tapestry of inquiry unlike any other.
Smith et al. (2018) examined the socioeconomic factors influencing dietary habits and stumbled upon an intriguing anomaly. Their findings suggested a peculiar uptick in butter consumption coinciding with periods of bullish activity in the stock market. While their study's ostensible focus was on dietary trends, the authors couldn't help but toast to the remarkable synchronicity between buttery indulgence and financial exuberance.
Doe and Jones (2020) expounded upon the ripple effects of consumer behavior on market dynamics, with a particular emphasis on seemingly unrelated products. Their work notably delved into the uncharted territory where spreadsheets and spreads collide, portraying the interplay of consumer sentiment and stock price movements. Amidst their discourse on consumer psychology, the authors inadvertently churned out intriguing observations regarding the uncanny convergence of butter consumption and stock market gyrations.
Turning to the realm of non-fiction literature, "The Economics of Butter" by John Smithwick provides a comprehensive overview of global butter production, consumption patterns, and market influences. While the book doesn't explicitly touch upon the financial sphere, its nuanced exploration of butter's economic reverberations offers a compelling backdrop for understanding the seemingly inexplicable relationship between butter and BlackRock's stock price.
Likewise, "Butter: A Cultural History" by Elaine Khosrova delves into the multifaceted facets of butter, ranging from its culinary significance to its historical implications. While not inherently tied to financial analyses, the book's insightful portrayal of butter's pervasive influence in various domains inadvertently invites contemplation on its potential impact on market forces and stock prices.
Shifting gears to the world of fiction, "Spread Thin: A Financial Fable" by A. Hedgefund whimsically weaves a tale of intrigue and whimsy centered around a mystical butter churn that mysteriously influences the stock prices of fictitious conglomerates. While the narrative may be more whimsical than scholarly, it embodies the underlying sentiment driving our earnest pursuit of uncovering the mysterious rapport between butter consumption and BlackRock's stock price.
Furthermore, social media chatter has provided anecdotal accounts of individuals correlating their butter-buying habits with stock market movements, albeit in jest. A post by @FinancialFoodie on Twitter humorously elucidates, "Buy butter to butter up your portfolio – it's the toast of Wall Street!" While such musings may be lighthearted quips, they underscore the pervasive allure of linking everyday choices to financial outcomes, inadvertently shining a comically earnest light on our study's peculiar subject matter.
In the wake of these diverse literary and anecdotal sources, our investigation steers into uncharted territory, guided by the whimsy of unlikely correlations and the earnest pursuit of unraveling the "butterfly effect" in the enigmatic world of financial analysis.

[[RESULTS]]
The quantitative analysis of the relationship between butter consumption and BlackRock's stock price yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9238025, indicative of a strong positive relationship between the two variables. This surprising finding suggests that as butter consumption increased, so did the stock price of BlackRock. Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was calculated to be 0.8534111, signifying that approximately 85.34% of the variation in BlackRock's stock price could be explained by changes in butter consumption. The statistical significance of this correlation was confirmed, with a p-value of less than 0.01, reinforcing the robustness of the observed relationship.
Figure 1, a scatterplot representing the association between butter consumption and BlackRock's stock price, vividly illustrates the compelling correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables. The scatterplot illuminates the upward trend, affirming the synchronous movements of butter consumption and BlackRock's stock price over the evaluated period.
This unexpected correlation, despite its initial incredulity, underscores the idiosyncrasies of financial markets and the mercurial nature of consumer behavior. The significant relationship discovered in this investigation invites a deeper exploration of the intricate mechanisms driving market dynamics and emphasizes the need to scrutinize seemingly unrelated factors in financial analysis. Our results prompt a reconsideration of conventional wisdom and an appreciation for the unanticipated interplay of diverse influences on market performance. As we churn through the implications of this peculiar correlation, we are reminded that in the world of finance, even the most unexpected pairings can reveal insights as rich and complex as a decadent buttery spread.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of this study have led to a veritable spread of interpretations and possibilities, emphasizing the unforeseen complexities lurking within the ostensibly mundane realms of butter consumption and stock market dynamics. As we delve into the implications of our findings, we find ourselves toast-ing to the unexpected avenues of inquiry that emerge from this peculiar correlation.

Our study's unearthing of a robust correlation coefficient between butter consumption and BlackRock's stock price serves as a testament to the adage, "Where there's a will, there's a way." Just as butter seamlessly integrates into a well-whisked batter, our results underscore the seemingly seamless integration of butter and BlackRock's stock price movements. This finding not only reaffirms the curious observations made by Smith et al. (2018) and Doe and Jones (2020), but also thrusts this unlikely correlation into the limelight of empirical validation.

While our discovery may seem as unlikely as finding a stockbroker at a dairy farm, the statistically significant relationship between these variables challenges us to expand our understanding of market influences and consumer behaviors. As we savor the magnitude of the correlation coefficient, we are reminded of the richness and complexity of financial markets, akin to the layers of a delectable croissant.

The scatterplot vividly depicts the tandem dance of butter consumption and BlackRock's stock price, akin to the synchronized steps of a butter-churning dance troupe. This visual representation not only captures the essence of our findings but also elucidates the harmonious interplay between these two seemingly disparate entities.

Our investigation stands as a beacon, illuminating the need to embrace the whimsy of unconventional correlations in financial analysis. Just as a dollop of butter elevates the flavor profile of a dish, the unexpected relationship uncovered in this study elevates our appreciation for the intricate tapestry of market dynamics. As we strive to make sense of this unorthodox correlation, we are reminded of the quote, "The greatest ideas are often found in the unlikeliest of places."

In conclusion, this study contributes to a burgeoning field of research that embraces the serendipitous nature of unexpected correlations and the interplay of the most surprising variables in financial analyses. It invites future exploration and inquiry into this paradoxical partnership between butter consumption and BlackRock's stock price, hinting at a rich landscape of potential insights awaiting discovery. Indeed, in the ever-unpredictable realm of financial analyses, even the most seemingly trivial factors may hold the key to unlocking valuable insights as uncommonly delightful as an exquisitely buttered scone.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and BlackRock's stock price (BLK). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Butter and BlackRock: A Budding Bromance?

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the unlikely partnership between butter consumption and the stock price of BlackRock (BLK), the world's largest asset management firm. With utmost seriousness and a hint of skepticism, we examined the data from the USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) from the period of 2002 to 2021 to unravel the seemingly absurd correlation between these two variables. Our findings revealed a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9238025 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a robust relationship between butter and BlackRock’s stock price. Our results beckon further investigation into the "spread" of financial influences and the "buttering up" of the market. We hope this study serves as a friendly reminder to always consider the "butterfly effect" in financial research.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the realm of financial analysis, the pursuit of uncovering unexpected relationships between disparate variables can yield fascinating insights. It is within this spirit of inquiry that we turn our attention to the apparent association between butter consumption and the stock price of BlackRock (BLK). On the surface, this correlation may seem as incongruous as a lactose-intolerant cow, but as we embark on this curious journey, we are reminded of the words of Louis Pasteur: "In the field of observation, chance favors only the prepared mind." With a touch of whimsy and a dash of skepticism, let us delve into the uncharted territory where margarine meets market analysis.
The butter market, not typically associated with high finance, and the stock price of BlackRock, an emblem of global asset management, seem an unlikely pair. However, as we saunter into the realm of statistical analysis, armed with butter knives and line graphs, we cannot help but ponder the richness of the relationship lurking beneath the surface. The trivialities of existence often unfold in the most unexpected facets of life, akin to a statistical regression's uncanny ability to unveil hidden patterns.
As we savored the data compiled by the USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) from 2002 to 2021, it became apparent that the numbers were churning, much like butter in a churn. Amidst the spreadsheets and the spreads, a correlation coefficient of 0.9238025 emerged, enrapturing our senses with the allure of improbable connections. The statistical significance of our findings, with a p-value of less than 0.01, beckoned us to contemplate the profound implications of this unanticipated intertwining of butter consumption and the movements of BlackRock's stock price.
This study represents a cautious foray into the quirky confluence of butter and finance, a veritable odd couple thrust into the limelight of statistical scrutiny. Our findings, while undeniably eyebrow-raising, urge us to approach the intricate dance of market dynamics with open minds and a readiness to embrace the unexpected. It is our hope that this research, albeit an unconventional romp through the annals of financial analysis, serves as a gentle nudge to engage in whimsical contemplation of the often unforeseen "buttery" influences permeating the vast landscape of market forces. After all, what is research if not an intrepid exploration of the "butterfly effect" in the complex tapestry of statistical revelations?

[[RESULTS]]
The quantitative analysis of the relationship between butter consumption and BlackRock's stock price yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9238025, indicative of a strong positive relationship between the two variables. This surprising finding suggests that as butter consumption increased, so did the stock price of BlackRock. Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was calculated to be 0.8534111, signifying that approximately 85.34% of the variation in BlackRock's stock price could be explained by changes in butter consumption. The statistical significance of this correlation was confirmed, with a p-value of less than 0.01, reinforcing the robustness of the observed relationship.
Figure 1, a scatterplot representing the association between butter consumption and BlackRock's stock price, vividly illustrates the compelling correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables. The scatterplot illuminates the upward trend, affirming the synchronous movements of butter consumption and BlackRock's stock price over the evaluated period.
This unexpected correlation, despite its initial incredulity, underscores the idiosyncrasies of financial markets and the mercurial nature of consumer behavior. The significant relationship discovered in this investigation invites a deeper exploration of the intricate mechanisms driving market dynamics and emphasizes the need to scrutinize seemingly unrelated factors in financial analysis. Our results prompt a reconsideration of conventional wisdom and an appreciation for the unanticipated interplay of diverse influences on market performance. As we churn through the implications of this peculiar correlation, we are reminded that in the world of finance, even the most unexpected pairings can reveal insights as rich and complex as a decadent buttery spread.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has unveiled a peculiar yet robust correlation between butter consumption and the stock price of BlackRock (BLK). The statistically significant relationship, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9238025 and a p-value of less than 0.01, has left us buttered with excitement and eggs-tremely eager to spread the word about these "buttery" financial conundrums. The r-squared value of 0.8534111 further emphasizes the importance of butter as a determinant of BlackRock's stock price, suggesting that over 85% of the variations in the latter can be explained by changes in the former.

The implications of our findings could churn the finance world into a frenzy, with potential consequences for derivative markets and risk management strategies. While this correlation may appear to be as outlandish as a cow jumping over the moon, it undeniably raises questions about the mystical influence of dairy delights on the machinations of global finance.

As we draw the curtain on this investigation, it is clear that no further research is needed in this area. The bond between butter and BlackRock is as strong as a fine French brie, and any additional study might just be over-egg-citing the findings. In the whimsical world of financial analysis, sometimes the most bizarre connections churn out the most fascinating insights, reminding us that in the land of statistics, every data point has its own story to spread.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Butter and BlackRock: A Budding Bromance?. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Financial Affairs and Dairy Relations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Butter and BlackRock: A Budding Bromance?. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Culinary and Financial Fusion Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Butter and BlackRock: A Budding Bromance? with an abstract of In this study, we delve into the unlikely partnership between butter consumption and the stock price of BlackRock (BLK), the world's largest asset management firm. With utmost seriousness and a hint of skepticism, we examined the data from the USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) from the period of 2002 to 2021 to unravel the seemingly absurd correlation between these two variables. Our findings revealed a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9238025 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a robust relationship between butter and BlackRock’s stock price. Our results beckon further investigation into the "spread" of financial influences and the "buttering up" of the market. We hope this study serves as a friendly reminder to always consider the "butterfly effect" in financial research.

ChatGPT:

butter consumption, BlackRock stock price, asset management firm, USDA data, LSEG Analytics, Refinitiv, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, financial influences, butterfly effect, market dynamics

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Butter consumption
Detailed data title: Per capita consumption of Butter in the US
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with Butter consumption

BlackRock's stock price (BLK)
Detailed data title: Opening price of BlackRock (BLK) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function

See what else correlates with BlackRock's stock price (BLK)

Correlation r = 0.9238025 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8534111 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 85.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., BlackRock's stock price (BLK)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Butter consumption) over the 20 years from 2002 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.2E-9. 0.0000000062221953580938395000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 6.2E-7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 160,714,980 random variables You don't actually need 160 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.81, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Butter consumption (Pounds per person)4.44.54.54.54.74.7554.95.45.55.55.55.65.75.766.26.36.5
BlackRock's stock price (BLK) (Stock price)41.7839.5853.1577.01109.48152.9216.8133236.05191.52183.65210.62315.38357.98333.04384.62518.78386.28510730.6




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4.4,4.5,4.5,4.5,4.7,4.7,5,5,4.9,5.4,5.5,5.5,5.5,5.6,5.7,5.7,6,6.2,6.3,6.5,])
array_2 = np.array([41.78,39.58,53.15,77.01,109.48,152.9,216.8,133,236.05,191.52,183.65,210.62,315.38,357.98,333.04,384.62,518.78,386.28,510,730.6,])
array_1_name = "Butter consumption"
array_2_name = "BlackRock's stock price (BLK)"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the correlation whisperer we needed!


Correlation ID: 3410 · Black Variable ID: 557 · Red Variable ID: 1636
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0