about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,356 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Annual US household spending on beef and the second variable is Boston Scientific's stock price (BSX).  The chart goes from 2002 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As households spent more on beef, they also invested in more comfortable couches to enjoy their meaty meals, leading to a surge in demand for Boston Scientific's heartburn and acid reflux medications, which boosted the company's stock price. Remember, a happy tummy makes for a happy stock market!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image of a TIME magazine cover that portrays a vibrant American neighborhood with families enjoying a summer barbecue in their backyard. The scene exudes a warm, inviting atmosphere with sizzling steaks on the grill and people gathered around, laughing and conversing. In the distance, a digital billboard displays the rising stock price of Boston Scientific (BSX), symbolizing the optimistic sentiment of investors. Feel free to also integrate elements that evoke a sunny, cheerful ambiance, such as blue skies, lush greenery, and the comforting scent of mouthwatering beef. The image should capture the essence of a joyous, communal gathering against the backdrop of economic vitality. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Annual US household spending on beef and Boston Scientific's stock price (BSX). Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cute cartoon Futuristic A TIME magazine cover image An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Realistic
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Annual US household spending on beef and Boston Scientific's stock price (BSX), in the following situation: Because the increase in Annual US household spending on beef led to a surge in carnivorous satisfaction, boosting the overall mood of the nation and inspiring investors to bid up Boston Scientific's stock price in anticipation of healthier, steak-loving consumers.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling American neighborhood, families gather in their backyard for hearty barbecues, grilling sizzling steaks and enjoying the warmth of the summer sun. As the aroma of mouthwatering beef wafts through the air, the sound of joyful laughter and contented conversation fills the scene. Meanwhile, on a digital billboard in the distance, the stock price of Boston Scientific (BSX) steadily climbs higher, mirroring the upbeat and optimistic sentiment of investors confident in the healthy appetite for beef.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling American neighborhood, families gather in their backyard for hearty barbecues, grilling sizzling steaks and enjoying the warmth of the summer sun. As the aroma of mouthwatering beef wafts through the air, the sound of joyful laughter and contented conversation fills the scene. Meanwhile, on a digital billboard in the distance, the stock price of Boston Scientific (BSX) steadily climbs higher, mirroring the upbeat and optimistic sentiment of investors confident in the healthy appetite for beef. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image of a TIME magazine cover that portrays a vibrant American neighborhood with families enjoying a summer barbecue in their backyard. The scene exudes a warm, inviting atmosphere with sizzling steaks on the grill and people gathered around, laughing and conversing. In the distance, a digital billboard displays the rising stock price of Boston Scientific (BSX), symbolizing the optimistic sentiment of investors. Feel free to also integrate elements that evoke a sunny, cheerful ambiance, such as blue skies, lush greenery, and the comforting scent of mouthwatering beef. The image should capture the essence of a joyous, communal gathering against the backdrop of economic vitality.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Annual US household spending on beef caused Boston Scientific's stock price (BSX) to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Beef Relief: A Correlational Grief in Household Spending and BSX Belief

The Journal of Culinary Economics and Food Psychology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on beef and Boston Scientific's stock price (BSX). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8414061 and p < 0.01 for 2002 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Beef Relief: A Correlational Grief in Household Spending and BSX Belief

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the belly of the beast to explore the relationship between Annual US household spending on beef and the stock price of Boston Scientific (BSX). Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we sought to unravel the mystery behind these seemingly disparate entities. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8414061 and a significance level of p < 0.01, our findings suggest a strong positive association between the two variables from 2002 to 2022. While we refrain from making any hasty conclusions, this unexpected connection may offer a tender morsel of insight for both economists and carnivorous investors alike.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on beef and Boston Scientific's stock price (BSX). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Beef Relief: A Correlational Grief in Household Spending and BSX Belief

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the belly of the beast to explore the relationship between Annual US household spending on beef and the stock price of Boston Scientific (BSX). Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we sought to unravel the mystery behind these seemingly disparate entities. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8414061 and a significance level of p < 0.01, our findings suggest a strong positive association between the two variables from 2002 to 2022. While we refrain from making any hasty conclusions, this unexpected connection may offer a tender morsel of insight for both economists and carnivorous investors alike.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The interplay between consumer behavior and stock price movements has long been a subject of fascination for researchers and practitioners alike. In this paper, we delve into a beefy matter - the connection between Annual US household spending on beef and the stock price of Boston Scientific (BSX). While this pairing may seem as incongruous as a vegetarian at a barbecue joint, our initial analysis has uncovered a surprisingly robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Hold your appetite, dear readers, as we embark on a journey to untangle the beefy mystery and sizzle the stakes in the world of finance and consumption.

The correlation between consumer spending and stock prices has been a regular source of interest for economists and investors. Past studies have examined various consumer spending categories, ranging from household goods to entertainment, but the specific connection between beef consumption and the stock price of Boston Scientific has remained largely uncharted territory. Yet, as curious academic gastronomes, we could not resist the temptation to explore this uncharted territory and chew through the data to uncover any unexpected correlations or tender morsels of insight.

Before we embark on this journey, it is essential to acknowledge the novelty of this inquiry. While financial analysts may quip about "bringing home the bacon," our study aims to determine if bringing home the beef may also have tangible implications, not just for the dinner table but for the stock market as well. However, as the saying goes, "the proof of the pudding is in the eating," and we must rigorously examine the evidence before indulging in any succulent conclusions.

We sincerely hope that this analysis will offer a fresh perspective, a rare medium well done, for both seasoned investors and those with a raw appetite for economic phenomena. So, let us slice through the data and season our findings with a sprinkle of statistical significance, as we unravel the enigmatic link between beefy spending and stock market beefiness.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on beef and Boston Scientific's stock price (BSX). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Beef Relief: A Correlational Grief in Household Spending and BSX Belief

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the belly of the beast to explore the relationship between Annual US household spending on beef and the stock price of Boston Scientific (BSX). Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we sought to unravel the mystery behind these seemingly disparate entities. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8414061 and a significance level of p < 0.01, our findings suggest a strong positive association between the two variables from 2002 to 2022. While we refrain from making any hasty conclusions, this unexpected connection may offer a tender morsel of insight for both economists and carnivorous investors alike.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The interplay between consumer behavior and stock price movements has long been a subject of fascination for researchers and practitioners alike. In this paper, we delve into a beefy matter - the connection between Annual US household spending on beef and the stock price of Boston Scientific (BSX). While this pairing may seem as incongruous as a vegetarian at a barbecue joint, our initial analysis has uncovered a surprisingly robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Hold your appetite, dear readers, as we embark on a journey to untangle the beefy mystery and sizzle the stakes in the world of finance and consumption.
The correlation between consumer spending and stock prices has been a regular source of interest for economists and investors. Past studies have examined various consumer spending categories, ranging from household goods to entertainment, but the specific connection between beef consumption and the stock price of Boston Scientific has remained largely uncharted territory. Yet, as curious academic gastronomes, we could not resist the temptation to explore this uncharted territory and chew through the data to uncover any unexpected correlations or tender morsels of insight.
Before we embark on this journey, it is essential to acknowledge the novelty of this inquiry. While financial analysts may quip about "bringing home the bacon," our study aims to determine if bringing home the beef may also have tangible implications, not just for the dinner table but for the stock market as well. However, as the saying goes, "the proof of the pudding is in the eating," and we must rigorously examine the evidence before indulging in any succulent conclusions.
We sincerely hope that this analysis will offer a fresh perspective, a rare medium well done, for both seasoned investors and those with a raw appetite for economic phenomena. So, let us slice through the data and season our findings with a sprinkle of statistical significance, as we unravel the enigmatic link between beefy spending and stock market beefiness.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between consumer behavior and stock price movements has been the subject of extensive research in both the economic and financial domains. Smith et al. (2016) and Doe et al. (2018) have delved into the intricate dance between consumer spending habits and stock market fluctuations, revealing the nuanced connections that underpin these seemingly unrelated realms. However, our research seeks to spice things up by exploring a particularly unconventional pairing - the annual US household spending on beef and the stock price of Boston Scientific (BSX).

While the existing literature has focused on more conventional consumer expenditure categories, we seek to tenderize this discourse by examining the beef market's potential influence on the stock performance of a medical devices company. Our study aims to bridge the gap between the carnivorous pursuits of households and the financial performance of a company operating in the healthcare industry, potentially uncovering a rare medium to well-done relationship that has been overlooked in previous research endeavors.

As we endeavor to unfurl the connection between beefy spending and BSX belief, it is prudent to acknowledge the potential whimsy of our inquiry. However, as the great thinker Shakespeare once mused, "All the world's a stage, and all the men and women merely players," we are merely players in the grand theater of academic research, seeking to bring forth a symphony of statistical evidence and financial insight for our discerning audience.

Turning to more formal literature, "Beefonomics: The Economics of Beef Consumption" by Jones (2017) sheds light on the economic dynamics of beef consumption, offering a comprehensive analysis of consumer behavior and market trends within the meat industry. This scholarly work provided us with a solid conceptual foundation as we embarked on our own investigation into the potential ramifications of beef spending on stock market dynamics.

In a similar vein, "The Bull and the Bear: A Comparative Analysis of Animal Market Metaphors" by Brown (2019) offers a thought-provoking exploration of animal-based metaphors in financial discourse. While not directly related to our specific research question, the metaphorical richness of this work prompted us to reflect on the potential symbolism inherent in our research topic. Could the beef market be a bullish indicator for the stock price of Boston Scientific, or are we merely chasing after red herrings in our pursuit of financial analogies?

Venturing into the realm of fiction, "The Tender Cuts Mystery" by Agatha Beefy (2015) presents a delightful culinary-themed detective story that, although fictional, sparked our creativity and imagination as we sought to unravel the mysteries lurking within our dataset. As we pored over regression analyses and financial statements, we couldn't help but draw parallels between our own investigatory endeavors and the whimsical world of literary sleuths embroiled in culinary conundrums.

On a more lighthearted note, the animated series "Beefy and the Stock Market Bulls" provided unexpected inspiration with its comical depiction of a team of bovine investors navigating the complexities of financial markets. While the show may cater to a younger audience, its portrayal of the beef industry and stock market dynamics offered a refreshing perspective on the intersection of beef-related themes and financial matters.

Our foray into these diverse literary and visual realms has served as a rich source of inspiration, infusing our research with a dash of creativity and humor amidst the rigors of empirical analysis. As we proceed to elucidate our findings, we invite readers to join us in this beef-laden expedition, where statistical significance and investment intrigue converge in a carnivorous spectacle of scholarly inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on beef and Boston Scientific's stock price (BSX). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2002 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Beef Relief: A Correlational Grief in Household Spending and BSX Belief

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the belly of the beast to explore the relationship between Annual US household spending on beef and the stock price of Boston Scientific (BSX). Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we sought to unravel the mystery behind these seemingly disparate entities. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8414061 and a significance level of p < 0.01, our findings suggest a strong positive association between the two variables from 2002 to 2022. While we refrain from making any hasty conclusions, this unexpected connection may offer a tender morsel of insight for both economists and carnivorous investors alike.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The interplay between consumer behavior and stock price movements has long been a subject of fascination for researchers and practitioners alike. In this paper, we delve into a beefy matter - the connection between Annual US household spending on beef and the stock price of Boston Scientific (BSX). While this pairing may seem as incongruous as a vegetarian at a barbecue joint, our initial analysis has uncovered a surprisingly robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Hold your appetite, dear readers, as we embark on a journey to untangle the beefy mystery and sizzle the stakes in the world of finance and consumption.
The correlation between consumer spending and stock prices has been a regular source of interest for economists and investors. Past studies have examined various consumer spending categories, ranging from household goods to entertainment, but the specific connection between beef consumption and the stock price of Boston Scientific has remained largely uncharted territory. Yet, as curious academic gastronomes, we could not resist the temptation to explore this uncharted territory and chew through the data to uncover any unexpected correlations or tender morsels of insight.
Before we embark on this journey, it is essential to acknowledge the novelty of this inquiry. While financial analysts may quip about "bringing home the bacon," our study aims to determine if bringing home the beef may also have tangible implications, not just for the dinner table but for the stock market as well. However, as the saying goes, "the proof of the pudding is in the eating," and we must rigorously examine the evidence before indulging in any succulent conclusions.
We sincerely hope that this analysis will offer a fresh perspective, a rare medium well done, for both seasoned investors and those with a raw appetite for economic phenomena. So, let us slice through the data and season our findings with a sprinkle of statistical significance, as we unravel the enigmatic link between beefy spending and stock market beefiness.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the relationship between Annual US household spending on beef and the stock price of Boston Scientific (BSX), a multifaceted and interdisciplinary approach was employed. Data on annual household beef spending was obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, while Boston Scientific's stock price information was procured from LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv). The chosen time frame for data collection spanned from 2002 to 2022, allowing for a comprehensive analysis of the two variables over a 20-year period.

The first step in our methodology involved meticulously gathering annual household beef spending data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. This process involved sifting through a veritable pasture of information to extract the relevant spending figures. We then meticulously combed through historical stock price data for Boston Scientific, focusing on daily closing prices, to construct a comprehensive dataset that mirrored the duration of our study period.

Once the data was corralled, we undertook a rigorous process of data cleaning and normalization to ensure the accuracy and consistency of our dataset. This involved identifying and addressing any outliers or errors that could potentially skew the analysis. Like expert butchers, we carefully trimmed away any excess fat from the dataset, ensuring that only the prime cuts of data were used for our analysis.

The next step in our methodology involved the application of statistical techniques to explore the potential relationship between beef spending and Boston Scientific's stock price. A robust correlation analysis was conducted to quantify the degree of association between the two variables. Our statistical analysis involved calculating the correlation coefficient and evaluating its significance level to ascertain the strength and direction of the relationship.

Furthermore, to account for potential confounding variables and external factors that could influence our findings, a multivariate regression analysis was performed. This allowed us to assess the impact of beef spending on BSX stock prices while controlling for other relevant economic indicators and market forces. This approach enabled us to slice through the layers of complexity and isolate the specific influence of beef spending on the stock price of Boston Scientific.

It is important to note that in our pursuit of academic and intellectual thoroughness, our methodology also incorporated sensitivity analyses and robustness checks to validate the stability of our findings. These analyses served as a safeguard against any statistical rump roast or tenderloin-tainted conclusions, ensuring the reliability and integrity of our results.

In summary, our methodological approach combined meticulous data collection, rigorous statistical analyses, and a determination to cut through the fat of uncertainty to uncover the potential connection between beef spending and BSX stock prices. The following section will present the succulent findings of our investigation, offering a rare and juicy insight into this unexplored intersection of consumer consumption and market dynamics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on beef and Boston Scientific's stock price (BSX). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .

For the time period 2002 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8414061, r-squared of 0.7079642, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Beef Relief: A Correlational Grief in Household Spending and BSX Belief

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the belly of the beast to explore the relationship between Annual US household spending on beef and the stock price of Boston Scientific (BSX). Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we sought to unravel the mystery behind these seemingly disparate entities. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8414061 and a significance level of p < 0.01, our findings suggest a strong positive association between the two variables from 2002 to 2022. While we refrain from making any hasty conclusions, this unexpected connection may offer a tender morsel of insight for both economists and carnivorous investors alike.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The interplay between consumer behavior and stock price movements has long been a subject of fascination for researchers and practitioners alike. In this paper, we delve into a beefy matter - the connection between Annual US household spending on beef and the stock price of Boston Scientific (BSX). While this pairing may seem as incongruous as a vegetarian at a barbecue joint, our initial analysis has uncovered a surprisingly robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Hold your appetite, dear readers, as we embark on a journey to untangle the beefy mystery and sizzle the stakes in the world of finance and consumption.
The correlation between consumer spending and stock prices has been a regular source of interest for economists and investors. Past studies have examined various consumer spending categories, ranging from household goods to entertainment, but the specific connection between beef consumption and the stock price of Boston Scientific has remained largely uncharted territory. Yet, as curious academic gastronomes, we could not resist the temptation to explore this uncharted territory and chew through the data to uncover any unexpected correlations or tender morsels of insight.
Before we embark on this journey, it is essential to acknowledge the novelty of this inquiry. While financial analysts may quip about "bringing home the bacon," our study aims to determine if bringing home the beef may also have tangible implications, not just for the dinner table but for the stock market as well. However, as the saying goes, "the proof of the pudding is in the eating," and we must rigorously examine the evidence before indulging in any succulent conclusions.
We sincerely hope that this analysis will offer a fresh perspective, a rare medium well done, for both seasoned investors and those with a raw appetite for economic phenomena. So, let us slice through the data and season our findings with a sprinkle of statistical significance, as we unravel the enigmatic link between beefy spending and stock market beefiness.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The heart of our investigation lay in scrutinizing the relationship between Annual US household spending on beef and Boston Scientific's stock price (BSX) over the period from 2002 to 2022. Our analysis revealed a robust correlation between these seemingly distinct variables, with a coefficient of 0.8414061. This suggests a strong positive association, providing food for thought for both financial enthusiasts and carnivorous investors.

Further bolstering the strength of this relationship, the r-squared value of 0.7079642 indicates that a significant portion of the variability in BSX stock price can be explained by changes in beef spending. In other words, it seems that beefy spending habits exert a considerable influence on the stock market's leanings toward Boston Scientific.

The p-value of less than 0.01 provides additional weight to our findings, indicating that the correlation between annual beef spending and BSX stock price is indeed statistically significant. This is not a rare rump roast abandoned in the freezer – the evidence supports the plausibility of a genuine connection, rather than a fluke occurrence.

Additionally, a scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually demonstrates the pronounced relationship between annual beef spending and BSX stock price. The points are tightly clustered around a positively sloped line, clearly illustrating the beefy influence of consumer spending on the stock market's perceptions of Boston Scientific.

In conclusion, our findings present a rare medley of data that unveils an unexpected, yet substantial link between beef consumption and stock market dynamics. While this may appear as an odd pairing, the evidence speaks for itself, serving up a delectable surprise for researchers and investors alike. This correlation offers a tender morsel of thought, perhaps encouraging a more meaty approach to understanding the financial world.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on beef and Boston Scientific's stock price (BSX). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Beef Relief: A Correlational Grief in Household Spending and BSX Belief

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the belly of the beast to explore the relationship between Annual US household spending on beef and the stock price of Boston Scientific (BSX). Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we sought to unravel the mystery behind these seemingly disparate entities. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8414061 and a significance level of p < 0.01, our findings suggest a strong positive association between the two variables from 2002 to 2022. While we refrain from making any hasty conclusions, this unexpected connection may offer a tender morsel of insight for both economists and carnivorous investors alike.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between consumer behavior and stock price movements has been the subject of extensive research in both the economic and financial domains. Smith et al. (2016) and Doe et al. (2018) have delved into the intricate dance between consumer spending habits and stock market fluctuations, revealing the nuanced connections that underpin these seemingly unrelated realms. However, our research seeks to spice things up by exploring a particularly unconventional pairing - the annual US household spending on beef and the stock price of Boston Scientific (BSX).
While the existing literature has focused on more conventional consumer expenditure categories, we seek to tenderize this discourse by examining the beef market's potential influence on the stock performance of a medical devices company. Our study aims to bridge the gap between the carnivorous pursuits of households and the financial performance of a company operating in the healthcare industry, potentially uncovering a rare medium to well-done relationship that has been overlooked in previous research endeavors.
As we endeavor to unfurl the connection between beefy spending and BSX belief, it is prudent to acknowledge the potential whimsy of our inquiry. However, as the great thinker Shakespeare once mused, "All the world's a stage, and all the men and women merely players," we are merely players in the grand theater of academic research, seeking to bring forth a symphony of statistical evidence and financial insight for our discerning audience.
Turning to more formal literature, "Beefonomics: The Economics of Beef Consumption" by Jones (2017) sheds light on the economic dynamics of beef consumption, offering a comprehensive analysis of consumer behavior and market trends within the meat industry. This scholarly work provided us with a solid conceptual foundation as we embarked on our own investigation into the potential ramifications of beef spending on stock market dynamics.
In a similar vein, "The Bull and the Bear: A Comparative Analysis of Animal Market Metaphors" by Brown (2019) offers a thought-provoking exploration of animal-based metaphors in financial discourse. While not directly related to our specific research question, the metaphorical richness of this work prompted us to reflect on the potential symbolism inherent in our research topic. Could the beef market be a bullish indicator for the stock price of Boston Scientific, or are we merely chasing after red herrings in our pursuit of financial analogies?
Venturing into the realm of fiction, "The Tender Cuts Mystery" by Agatha Beefy (2015) presents a delightful culinary-themed detective story that, although fictional, sparked our creativity and imagination as we sought to unravel the mysteries lurking within our dataset. As we pored over regression analyses and financial statements, we couldn't help but draw parallels between our own investigatory endeavors and the whimsical world of literary sleuths embroiled in culinary conundrums.
On a more lighthearted note, the animated series "Beefy and the Stock Market Bulls" provided unexpected inspiration with its comical depiction of a team of bovine investors navigating the complexities of financial markets. While the show may cater to a younger audience, its portrayal of the beef industry and stock market dynamics offered a refreshing perspective on the intersection of beef-related themes and financial matters.
Our foray into these diverse literary and visual realms has served as a rich source of inspiration, infusing our research with a dash of creativity and humor amidst the rigors of empirical analysis. As we proceed to elucidate our findings, we invite readers to join us in this beef-laden expedition, where statistical significance and investment intrigue converge in a carnivorous spectacle of scholarly inquiry.

[[RESULTS]]
The heart of our investigation lay in scrutinizing the relationship between Annual US household spending on beef and Boston Scientific's stock price (BSX) over the period from 2002 to 2022. Our analysis revealed a robust correlation between these seemingly distinct variables, with a coefficient of 0.8414061. This suggests a strong positive association, providing food for thought for both financial enthusiasts and carnivorous investors.
Further bolstering the strength of this relationship, the r-squared value of 0.7079642 indicates that a significant portion of the variability in BSX stock price can be explained by changes in beef spending. In other words, it seems that beefy spending habits exert a considerable influence on the stock market's leanings toward Boston Scientific.
The p-value of less than 0.01 provides additional weight to our findings, indicating that the correlation between annual beef spending and BSX stock price is indeed statistically significant. This is not a rare rump roast abandoned in the freezer – the evidence supports the plausibility of a genuine connection, rather than a fluke occurrence.
Additionally, a scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually demonstrates the pronounced relationship between annual beef spending and BSX stock price. The points are tightly clustered around a positively sloped line, clearly illustrating the beefy influence of consumer spending on the stock market's perceptions of Boston Scientific.
In conclusion, our findings present a rare medley of data that unveils an unexpected, yet substantial link between beef consumption and stock market dynamics. While this may appear as an odd pairing, the evidence speaks for itself, serving up a delectable surprise for researchers and investors alike. This correlation offers a tender morsel of thought, perhaps encouraging a more meaty approach to understanding the financial world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study have brought to light a connection between annual US household spending on beef and the stock price of Boston Scientific (BSX) that warrants further consideration. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8414061, as well as the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, underscore the substantial nature of this relationship. Our results align with prior research on the interplay between consumer behavior and stock market dynamics, as well as the broader implications of market trends on specific industries.

Returning to the literature review, the playful exploration of animal-based metaphors in financial discourse by Brown (2019) takes on newfound significance in the context of our findings. The "Bull and the Bear" metaphor, often employed in financial analysis, has traditionally been associated with market optimism and pessimism, respectively. However, our research introduces a novel addition to this menagerie of market symbols – the beef market. While on its surface, this addition may appear whimsical, the empirical evidence suggests that the beef industry holds tangible implications for the stock price of BSX. This adds a new layer of nuance to the animal market metaphor, expanding the lexicon of symbolic representations in financial discourse.

Moreover, the insights gleaned from "The Tender Cuts Mystery" by Agatha Beefy (2015) have, in a surprising turn of events, shed light on a genuine mystery lurking within our dataset. While our research may lack the dramatic flair and culinary intrigue of a fictional detective story, the unexpected correlation between beef spending and stock performance has elevated our investigation to a real-life enigma waiting to be unraveled. Through disciplined statistical analysis, we have unraveled the threads of this mystery, revealing a substantive relationship that carries meaningful implications for both economic and investment considerations.

The television series "Beefy and the Stock Market Bulls," although initially encountered in a lighthearted context, has served as a prescient foreshadowing of the tangible intersection between the beef industry and financial markets. As the animated bovine investors navigated the complexities of market dynamics, little did we anticipate that our own research endeavors would lead us to a convergence of statistical significance and investment intrigue in the form of beef consumption and BSX stock price. This unexpected alignment underscores the boundless avenues through which inspiration can materialize in scholarly inquiry, reminding us that even the most unconventional sources may hold kernels of relevance to empirical investigations.

In summary, our findings lend credence to the unassuming yet potent influence of consumer behavior in shaping stock market movements, particularly with regard to Boston Scientific. While the coalescence of beef spending and BSX stock price may initially appear as an incongruous pairing, our evidence attests to the tangible impact that consumer habits in the beef market can exert on the financial performance of a specific company. As we resist the temptation to overcook our conclusions, the sizzle of this unexpected linkage invites further exploration and contemplation, serving as a friendly reminder that the world of economic phenomena is indeed a rare medium to well-done pursuit.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on beef and Boston Scientific's stock price (BSX). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Beef Relief: A Correlational Grief in Household Spending and BSX Belief

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the belly of the beast to explore the relationship between Annual US household spending on beef and the stock price of Boston Scientific (BSX). Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we sought to unravel the mystery behind these seemingly disparate entities. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8414061 and a significance level of p < 0.01, our findings suggest a strong positive association between the two variables from 2002 to 2022. While we refrain from making any hasty conclusions, this unexpected connection may offer a tender morsel of insight for both economists and carnivorous investors alike.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The interplay between consumer behavior and stock price movements has long been a subject of fascination for researchers and practitioners alike. In this paper, we delve into a beefy matter - the connection between Annual US household spending on beef and the stock price of Boston Scientific (BSX). While this pairing may seem as incongruous as a vegetarian at a barbecue joint, our initial analysis has uncovered a surprisingly robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Hold your appetite, dear readers, as we embark on a journey to untangle the beefy mystery and sizzle the stakes in the world of finance and consumption.
The correlation between consumer spending and stock prices has been a regular source of interest for economists and investors. Past studies have examined various consumer spending categories, ranging from household goods to entertainment, but the specific connection between beef consumption and the stock price of Boston Scientific has remained largely uncharted territory. Yet, as curious academic gastronomes, we could not resist the temptation to explore this uncharted territory and chew through the data to uncover any unexpected correlations or tender morsels of insight.
Before we embark on this journey, it is essential to acknowledge the novelty of this inquiry. While financial analysts may quip about "bringing home the bacon," our study aims to determine if bringing home the beef may also have tangible implications, not just for the dinner table but for the stock market as well. However, as the saying goes, "the proof of the pudding is in the eating," and we must rigorously examine the evidence before indulging in any succulent conclusions.
We sincerely hope that this analysis will offer a fresh perspective, a rare medium well done, for both seasoned investors and those with a raw appetite for economic phenomena. So, let us slice through the data and season our findings with a sprinkle of statistical significance, as we unravel the enigmatic link between beefy spending and stock market beefiness.

[[RESULTS]]
The heart of our investigation lay in scrutinizing the relationship between Annual US household spending on beef and Boston Scientific's stock price (BSX) over the period from 2002 to 2022. Our analysis revealed a robust correlation between these seemingly distinct variables, with a coefficient of 0.8414061. This suggests a strong positive association, providing food for thought for both financial enthusiasts and carnivorous investors.
Further bolstering the strength of this relationship, the r-squared value of 0.7079642 indicates that a significant portion of the variability in BSX stock price can be explained by changes in beef spending. In other words, it seems that beefy spending habits exert a considerable influence on the stock market's leanings toward Boston Scientific.
The p-value of less than 0.01 provides additional weight to our findings, indicating that the correlation between annual beef spending and BSX stock price is indeed statistically significant. This is not a rare rump roast abandoned in the freezer – the evidence supports the plausibility of a genuine connection, rather than a fluke occurrence.
Additionally, a scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually demonstrates the pronounced relationship between annual beef spending and BSX stock price. The points are tightly clustered around a positively sloped line, clearly illustrating the beefy influence of consumer spending on the stock market's perceptions of Boston Scientific.
In conclusion, our findings present a rare medley of data that unveils an unexpected, yet substantial link between beef consumption and stock market dynamics. While this may appear as an odd pairing, the evidence speaks for itself, serving up a delectable surprise for researchers and investors alike. This correlation offers a tender morsel of thought, perhaps encouraging a more meaty approach to understanding the financial world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation has proven to be quite the beefy endeavor, unveiling a surprisingly robust association between Annual US household spending on beef and Boston Scientific's stock price (BSX). The correlation coefficient of 0.8414061, akin to a well-marbled cut, indicates a strong positive link, leaving no room for veggie-tabled doubt. The statistical significance, with a p-value of less than 0.01, further supports the notion that this connection is no mere mincemeat of happenstance, but a substantial finding worthy of rare recognition.

This unexpected rendezvous between beef and BSX stock price may provide a fresh perspective for investors, reminding them that in the world of finance, one must always be prepared to steak their claim in uncharted territories. After all, as the famous economist John Maynard Keynes said, "It's better to be roughly right than precisely wrong," and our findings certainly seem to be hitting the bullseye of financial relevance.

As much as we would relish the opportunity to delve further into the beefy mysteries of stock market influences, we dare say that this particular topic has been thoroughly seared, rested, and is now ready to be devoured by the academic and investment communities. There's no need to beat a dead horse – or a dead cow, for that matter – as the evidence has been grilled, and the aroma of this correlation leaves little room for debate.

In the grand scheme of investment delicacies, our findings may encourage a more carnivorous approach to understanding consumer preferences and their impact on stock markets, reminding investors that sometimes, one must simply "meat" their financial fate. With this, we declare that no further research is needed in this area, and we invite fellow researchers and investors to "steak" their interests in other uncharted territories of financial and consumer behavior.

After all, in the words of the great philosopher Epicurus, "We should look for someone to eat and drink with before looking for something to eat and drink." And in the world of finance, it seems that beef may indeed be the perfect pairing to stock market success. Cheers to that!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Beef Relief: A Correlational Grief in Household Spending and BSX Belief. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Culinary Economics and Food Psychology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Beef Relief: A Correlational Grief in Household Spending and BSX Belief. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for the Advancement of Culinary and Cultural Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Beef Relief: A Correlational Grief in Household Spending and BSX Belief with an abstract of In this paper, we delve into the belly of the beast to explore the relationship between Annual US household spending on beef and the stock price of Boston Scientific (BSX). Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we sought to unravel the mystery behind these seemingly disparate entities. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8414061 and a significance level of p < 0.01, our findings suggest a strong positive association between the two variables from 2002 to 2022. While we refrain from making any hasty conclusions, this unexpected connection may offer a tender morsel of insight for both economists and carnivorous investors alike.

ChatGPT:

Beef consumption, Household spending, Stock price, Boston Scientific, BSX, Correlation, Correlational study, Bureau of Labor Statistics, LSEG Analytics, Refinitiv, Economic impact, Consumer behavior, Investment analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Annual US household spending on beef
Detailed data title: Average annual household spend on beef
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
See what else correlates with Annual US household spending on beef

Boston Scientific's stock price (BSX)
Detailed data title: Opening price of Boston Scientific (BSX) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function

See what else correlates with Boston Scientific's stock price (BSX)

Correlation r = 0.8414061 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7079642 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 70.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Boston Scientific's stock price (BSX)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Annual US household spending on beef) over the 21 years from 2002 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.8E-6. 0.0000017591646114647650000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.84 in 0.00018% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 568,452 random variables You don't actually need 568 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 20 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 20 because we have two variables measured over a period of 21 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.64, 0.93 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Annual US household spending on beef (Household spend)231246265228236216239226217223226219232245244253253270296293317
Boston Scientific's stock price (BSX) (Stock price)11.921.3636.973424.5617.2811.657.728.867.575.425.8612.0213.2918.1621.7224.9434.6545.536.0842.59




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([231,246,265,228,236,216,239,226,217,223,226,219,232,245,244,253,253,270,296,293,317,])
array_2 = np.array([11.9,21.36,36.97,34,24.56,17.28,11.65,7.72,8.86,7.57,5.42,5.86,12.02,13.29,18.16,21.72,24.94,34.65,45.5,36.08,42.59,])
array_1_name = "Annual US household spending on beef"
array_2_name = "Boston Scientific's stock price (BSX)"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your dedication to rating warms my heart!


Correlation ID: 3356 · Black Variable ID: 19889 · Red Variable ID: 1662
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0