Report an error
Annual US household spending on beef correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Bachelor's degrees awarded in information sciences | r=0.97 | 10yrs | No |
| Mastercard's stock price (MA) | r=0.97 | 16yrs | No |
| Wind power generated in Kazakhstan | r=0.96 | 16yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'why do i have a migraine' | r=0.96 | 19yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'takeout near me' | r=0.93 | 18yrs | No |
| Votes for Democratic Senators in Idaho | r=0.92 | 6yrs | Yes! |
| Google searches for 'avocado toast' | r=0.91 | 15yrs | No |
| Votes for the Republican Presidential candidate in New York | r=0.9 | 6yrs | No |
| Amazon.com's stock price (AMZN) | r=0.88 | 21yrs | No |
| Boston Scientific's stock price (BSX) | r=0.84 | 21yrs | Yes! |
| Google searches for 'how to move to europe' | r=0.84 | 19yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on beef also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)