about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,033 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Master's degrees awarded in Architecture and the second variable is Asthma prevalence in American children.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2019, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of Master's degrees awarded in Architecture and related services decreased, there were fewer professionals available to design those mind-blowingly avant-garde, ultra-modern buildings. With less cutting-edge architecture pushing the boundaries of structural design, there was a noticeable absence of impossibly intricate, astoundingly bizarre, and, let's face it, utterly perplexing buildings. As a result, children across America were no longer left breathless and wheezing in awe at the sight of these architectural marvels, leading to a decrease in asthma prevalence. It's a wheeze-ically complex relationship, but it seems that as the architectural world scaled back on mind-bending creations, little lungs could finally breathe a sigh of relief.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie: Under a clear blue sky, a vibrant town is brought to life with colorful buildings and joyful green spaces. Children are seen playing in lush, open parks, surrounded by trees and blooming flowers. The town exudes a sense of community and happiness, as families enjoy the fresh, clean air together. In the distance, a small graduation ceremony is taking place, where individuals are being awarded their Master's degrees in Architecture and related services. The scene captures the beauty of a town thriving with nature and the spirit of accomplishment. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Master's degrees awarded in Architecture and related services and Asthma prevalence in American children. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Whimsical illustration Voxel art An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Futuristic
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Master's degrees awarded in Architecture and related services and Asthma prevalence in American children, in the following situation: As fewer architects were educated, there were fewer buildings being designed and constructed, leading to less exposure to potentially asthma-inducing building materials and allergens, resulting in a decrease in asthma prevalence among American children.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a town with fewer architects, there are fewer buildings being designed and constructed. As a result, there are more open green spaces and parks throughout the town. Children are playing outdoors in these green spaces without being exposed to potential asthma-inducing building materials and allergens. The prevalence of asthma among American children in the town has decreased, and more children are seen playing happily in the fresh, open air. Meanwhile, a few individuals are being awarded Master's degrees in Architecture and related services at a small graduation ceremony.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie ] and depicting this scene: In a town with fewer architects, there are fewer buildings being designed and constructed. As a result, there are more open green spaces and parks throughout the town. Children are playing outdoors in these green spaces without being exposed to potential asthma-inducing building materials and allergens. The prevalence of asthma among American children in the town has decreased, and more children are seen playing happily in the fresh, open air. Meanwhile, a few individuals are being awarded Master's degrees in Architecture and related services at a small graduation ceremony. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie: Under a clear blue sky, a vibrant town is brought to life with colorful buildings and joyful green spaces. Children are seen playing in lush, open parks, surrounded by trees and blooming flowers. The town exudes a sense of community and happiness, as families enjoy the fresh, clean air together. In the distance, a small graduation ceremony is taking place, where individuals are being awarded their Master's degrees in Architecture and related services. The scene captures the beauty of a town thriving with nature and the spirit of accomplishment.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Master's degrees awarded in Architecture and related services caused Asthma prevalence in American children to decrease. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Big Blueprints: Unearthing the Asthma-Architect Connection in American Children

The Journal of Pediatric Pulmonary Phenomena

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Architecture and related services and Asthma prevalence in American children. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and National Center for Health Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9718919 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2019.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Big Blueprints: Unearthing the Asthma-Architect Connection in American Children

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the surprising link between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Architecture and related services and the prevalence of asthma among American children. Drawing on data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the National Center for Health Statistics, we sought to wheeze out the truth behind this seemingly unlikely association. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9718919 and a p-value of less than 0.01 between the two variables, spanning the years 2012 to 2019. It's as if the architectural blueprints are leaving our little ones feeling a bit "blue" with an air of asthma. Our research adds a breath of fresh air to the dialogue on childhood asthma, shedding light on a curious juncture between the built environment and respiratory health. This work holds promise in stimulating further inquiry into the intersections of design and public health, offering a blueprint for future investigations into the curious connections beneath our noses. And who knows, maybe this research could inspire architects to create "breathtaking" structures!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Architecture and related services and Asthma prevalence in American children. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Big Blueprints: Unearthing the Asthma-Architect Connection in American Children

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the surprising link between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Architecture and related services and the prevalence of asthma among American children. Drawing on data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the National Center for Health Statistics, we sought to wheeze out the truth behind this seemingly unlikely association. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9718919 and a p-value of less than 0.01 between the two variables, spanning the years 2012 to 2019. It's as if the architectural blueprints are leaving our little ones feeling a bit "blue" with an air of asthma. Our research adds a breath of fresh air to the dialogue on childhood asthma, shedding light on a curious juncture between the built environment and respiratory health. This work holds promise in stimulating further inquiry into the intersections of design and public health, offering a blueprint for future investigations into the curious connections beneath our noses. And who knows, maybe this research could inspire architects to create "breathtaking" structures!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the world of research, one often stumbles upon unexpected connections, like finding out that the number of Master's degrees awarded in Architecture and related services may have an inhale-able impact on the prevalence of asthma among American children. It's a breath of fresh air to uncover such surprising links, especially when they initially seem as unlikely as a dad joke at a scientific conference. Speaking of which, did you hear about the statistician who drowned in a river with an average depth of 3 feet? He must have taken the mean too seriously! As we embark on this research journey, let's delve into the intriguing world of childhood asthma and architectural blueprints.

Our investigation sprouted from a seed of curiosity about the potential relationship between the built environment and respiratory health. This quirky exploration goes beyond mere number-crunching; it's an attempt to bridge the gap between the concrete structures of the physical world and the ethereal breaths of our little ones. It's almost as if we're playing a real-life game of "Where's Waldo," except in this case, we're seeking the hidden relationships amidst the data points. It's like looking for the statistical needle in a haystack, only this needle might help us sew together a clearer picture of childhood asthma prevention. Why did the statistician get cold during the walk? Because he forgot to wear his "degrees"!

As we embark on this investigation, we stand on the shoulders of giants before us – the researchers who ventured into uncharted territories to unravel the mysteries of our world. We follow in the footsteps of the statistical daredevils who braved the wilds of data analysis to bring order to the chaos of variables and coefficients. They waded through rivers of p-values and trekked across mountains of standard deviations, all in pursuit of truth. Perhaps they even threw in an odd dad joke or two to lighten the daunting world of academia. After all, why should researchers have all the fun?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Architecture and related services and Asthma prevalence in American children. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Big Blueprints: Unearthing the Asthma-Architect Connection in American Children

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the surprising link between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Architecture and related services and the prevalence of asthma among American children. Drawing on data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the National Center for Health Statistics, we sought to wheeze out the truth behind this seemingly unlikely association. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9718919 and a p-value of less than 0.01 between the two variables, spanning the years 2012 to 2019. It's as if the architectural blueprints are leaving our little ones feeling a bit "blue" with an air of asthma. Our research adds a breath of fresh air to the dialogue on childhood asthma, shedding light on a curious juncture between the built environment and respiratory health. This work holds promise in stimulating further inquiry into the intersections of design and public health, offering a blueprint for future investigations into the curious connections beneath our noses. And who knows, maybe this research could inspire architects to create "breathtaking" structures!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the world of research, one often stumbles upon unexpected connections, like finding out that the number of Master's degrees awarded in Architecture and related services may have an inhale-able impact on the prevalence of asthma among American children. It's a breath of fresh air to uncover such surprising links, especially when they initially seem as unlikely as a dad joke at a scientific conference. Speaking of which, did you hear about the statistician who drowned in a river with an average depth of 3 feet? He must have taken the mean too seriously! As we embark on this research journey, let's delve into the intriguing world of childhood asthma and architectural blueprints.
Our investigation sprouted from a seed of curiosity about the potential relationship between the built environment and respiratory health. This quirky exploration goes beyond mere number-crunching; it's an attempt to bridge the gap between the concrete structures of the physical world and the ethereal breaths of our little ones. It's almost as if we're playing a real-life game of "Where's Waldo," except in this case, we're seeking the hidden relationships amidst the data points. It's like looking for the statistical needle in a haystack, only this needle might help us sew together a clearer picture of childhood asthma prevention. Why did the statistician get cold during the walk? Because he forgot to wear his "degrees"!
As we embark on this investigation, we stand on the shoulders of giants before us – the researchers who ventured into uncharted territories to unravel the mysteries of our world. We follow in the footsteps of the statistical daredevils who braved the wilds of data analysis to bring order to the chaos of variables and coefficients. They waded through rivers of p-values and trekked across mountains of standard deviations, all in pursuit of truth. Perhaps they even threw in an odd dad joke or two to lighten the daunting world of academia. After all, why should researchers have all the fun?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The investigation of the link between Master's degrees awarded in Architecture and related services and the prevalence of asthma among American children has attracted the attention of researchers in recent years. In "Blueprints and Breathing: A Statistical Analysis," Smith et al. explore the potential impact of environmental factors, such as architectural design, on respiratory health outcomes. Their study raises thought-provoking questions about the unseen influence of the built environment on childhood asthma. Can the housing design really leave our little ones breathless, or are these findings just a lot of hot air?

Why don't we ever tell secrets on a farm? Because the potatoes have eyes and the corn has ears! Taking a closer look at the literature reveals intriguing insights from Doe and Jones in "Structural Design and Pediatric Respiratory Health." The authors delve into the intricate interactions between architectural attributes and indoor air quality, pointing to potential avenues for mitigating asthma triggers in the home environment. It seems the blueprints may hold more than just design aspirations – they might also hold the breaths of our children. It's like a who-dun-it mystery, except the culprit might just be lurking in the floor plan!

Shifting gears slightly, "The Architecture of Breathing: A Design Perspective" by Lorem Ipsum examines the psychological impact of spatial layout on children's respiratory well-being. The author uncovers the potential of architectural interventions to promote healthier breathing habits, proposing innovative approaches to architectural design that could literally "breathe" new life into asthma prevention strategies. Perhaps a well-designed building can be a breath of fresh air in more ways than one.

Connecting to the fictitious realm, the classic novel "The Asthmatic Architect" by Edgar A. Inspiration explores the trials and tribulations of an architect grappling with the challenges of respiratory health while striving to create awe-inspiring structures. While fictional, the narrative offers poignant reflections on the delicate balance between artistic expression and physical well-being in the architectural domain. It's almost as if the protagonist is trying to "draw" a balance between their love for architecture and their lung capacity.

Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! Turning to the world of films, "Breathe: The Architect's Tale" is a cinematic exploration of the bond between architectural ingenuity and respiratory health. This visually stunning tale follows the journey of an architect seeking to forge a connection between their artistic vision and the well-being of the community. It's a heartwarming yet wheezy depiction of the profound impact that architectural decisions can have on the breaths of our society.

As we navigate through the multidimensional landscape of literature on this topic, it becomes evident that the relationship between architectural factors and childhood asthma is as complex as it is surprisingly intriguing. These diverse perspectives invite us to ponder the profound yet often overlooked ways in which the design of our surroundings can shape our respiratory destinies. Will architects now need to consider asthma as well as asthetics?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Architecture and related services and Asthma prevalence in American children. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and National Center for Health Statistics . You used data from 2012 to 2019

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Big Blueprints: Unearthing the Asthma-Architect Connection in American Children

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the surprising link between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Architecture and related services and the prevalence of asthma among American children. Drawing on data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the National Center for Health Statistics, we sought to wheeze out the truth behind this seemingly unlikely association. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9718919 and a p-value of less than 0.01 between the two variables, spanning the years 2012 to 2019. It's as if the architectural blueprints are leaving our little ones feeling a bit "blue" with an air of asthma. Our research adds a breath of fresh air to the dialogue on childhood asthma, shedding light on a curious juncture between the built environment and respiratory health. This work holds promise in stimulating further inquiry into the intersections of design and public health, offering a blueprint for future investigations into the curious connections beneath our noses. And who knows, maybe this research could inspire architects to create "breathtaking" structures!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the world of research, one often stumbles upon unexpected connections, like finding out that the number of Master's degrees awarded in Architecture and related services may have an inhale-able impact on the prevalence of asthma among American children. It's a breath of fresh air to uncover such surprising links, especially when they initially seem as unlikely as a dad joke at a scientific conference. Speaking of which, did you hear about the statistician who drowned in a river with an average depth of 3 feet? He must have taken the mean too seriously! As we embark on this research journey, let's delve into the intriguing world of childhood asthma and architectural blueprints.
Our investigation sprouted from a seed of curiosity about the potential relationship between the built environment and respiratory health. This quirky exploration goes beyond mere number-crunching; it's an attempt to bridge the gap between the concrete structures of the physical world and the ethereal breaths of our little ones. It's almost as if we're playing a real-life game of "Where's Waldo," except in this case, we're seeking the hidden relationships amidst the data points. It's like looking for the statistical needle in a haystack, only this needle might help us sew together a clearer picture of childhood asthma prevention. Why did the statistician get cold during the walk? Because he forgot to wear his "degrees"!
As we embark on this investigation, we stand on the shoulders of giants before us – the researchers who ventured into uncharted territories to unravel the mysteries of our world. We follow in the footsteps of the statistical daredevils who braved the wilds of data analysis to bring order to the chaos of variables and coefficients. They waded through rivers of p-values and trekked across mountains of standard deviations, all in pursuit of truth. Perhaps they even threw in an odd dad joke or two to lighten the daunting world of academia. After all, why should researchers have all the fun?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unearth the mysterious connection between Master's degrees awarded in Architecture and related services and the prevalence of asthma in American children, we engaged in a statistical safari across the plains of data from the years 2012 to 2019. Using a shovel of curiosity and a compass of determination, we gathered information from the National Center for Education Statistics and the National Center for Health Statistics, navigating the treacherous landscapes of Excel spreadsheets and bar graphs. It was a real data-digging expedition, but as they say, when in doubt, take the data by the horns!

Our first step on this mathematical odyssey involved calculating the number of Master's degrees awarded in Architecture and related services, harking back to the ancient art of counting without falling asleep. We examined the annual reports from the National Center for Education Statistics, being careful not to get lost in the labyrinth of degree titles and academic jargon. We also cross-referenced this with the growth of new architectural firms, attempting to capture the architectural zeitgeist and its potential impact on asthma rates. After all, it's not every day you come across a field where blueprints are a matter of life and breath.

Moving on to the realm of asthma prevalence, we navigated through the thickets of statistical surveys and research papers, learning to distinguish between a wheeze and a cough in the data. We scrutinized the National Center for Health Statistics' treasure trove of asthma prevalence figures, donning our metaphorical detective hats in pursuit of the elusive culprit behind the heightened rates of childhood asthma. Alas, the journey through these datasets was no walk in the park, but rather a statistical obstacle course with asthma triggers lurking around every bar chart corner.

After extracting the necessary data, we conducted a series of statistical acrobatics to disentangle the relationship between Master's degrees in Architecture and related services and childhood asthma prevalence. We harnessed the power of correlation coefficients to unravel the threads connecting the two variables, employing the time-tested method of scatter plots to visualize the dance of the data points. It was a wild statistical tango, but with some fancy footwork and a dash of statistical pizzazz, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9718919 - a revelation that left us feeling breathless but not asthmatic.

Concluding this whirlwind tour through the numerical wilderness, we subjected our findings to the formidable gauntlet of hypothesis testing, evaluating whether the observed correlation between architectural aspirations and asthma prevalence was a mere statistical fluke or a genuine phenomenon. With a p-value of less than 0.01, our results emerged from this statistical crucible with flying colors, signifying a robust connection that begged further exploration. It's as if the statistical stars aligned to shine a spotlight on this unexpected convergence of architecture and respiratory health.

In the grand tradition of academic inquiry, we acknowledge the limitations of our study, for no statistical odyssey is without its hidden caverns and unexplored territories. Nonetheless, our research brings a lungful of fresh air to the discourse on childhood asthma, paving the way for future investigations into the subtle interplay between the built environment and the breaths of the next generation. And who knows, maybe our findings will inspire architects to build even "airier" structures!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Architecture and related services and Asthma prevalence in American children. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and National Center for Health Statistics .

For the time period 2012 to 2019, you found a correlation 0.9718919, r-squared of 0.9445738, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Big Blueprints: Unearthing the Asthma-Architect Connection in American Children

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the surprising link between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Architecture and related services and the prevalence of asthma among American children. Drawing on data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the National Center for Health Statistics, we sought to wheeze out the truth behind this seemingly unlikely association. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9718919 and a p-value of less than 0.01 between the two variables, spanning the years 2012 to 2019. It's as if the architectural blueprints are leaving our little ones feeling a bit "blue" with an air of asthma. Our research adds a breath of fresh air to the dialogue on childhood asthma, shedding light on a curious juncture between the built environment and respiratory health. This work holds promise in stimulating further inquiry into the intersections of design and public health, offering a blueprint for future investigations into the curious connections beneath our noses. And who knows, maybe this research could inspire architects to create "breathtaking" structures!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the world of research, one often stumbles upon unexpected connections, like finding out that the number of Master's degrees awarded in Architecture and related services may have an inhale-able impact on the prevalence of asthma among American children. It's a breath of fresh air to uncover such surprising links, especially when they initially seem as unlikely as a dad joke at a scientific conference. Speaking of which, did you hear about the statistician who drowned in a river with an average depth of 3 feet? He must have taken the mean too seriously! As we embark on this research journey, let's delve into the intriguing world of childhood asthma and architectural blueprints.
Our investigation sprouted from a seed of curiosity about the potential relationship between the built environment and respiratory health. This quirky exploration goes beyond mere number-crunching; it's an attempt to bridge the gap between the concrete structures of the physical world and the ethereal breaths of our little ones. It's almost as if we're playing a real-life game of "Where's Waldo," except in this case, we're seeking the hidden relationships amidst the data points. It's like looking for the statistical needle in a haystack, only this needle might help us sew together a clearer picture of childhood asthma prevention. Why did the statistician get cold during the walk? Because he forgot to wear his "degrees"!
As we embark on this investigation, we stand on the shoulders of giants before us – the researchers who ventured into uncharted territories to unravel the mysteries of our world. We follow in the footsteps of the statistical daredevils who braved the wilds of data analysis to bring order to the chaos of variables and coefficients. They waded through rivers of p-values and trekked across mountains of standard deviations, all in pursuit of truth. Perhaps they even threw in an odd dad joke or two to lighten the daunting world of academia. After all, why should researchers have all the fun?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis yielded a compelling correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Architecture and related services and the prevalence of asthma in American children. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.9718919, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's as if every architectural degree added a wheezy touch to the air for our youngsters. This finding surpasses the initial surprise; it's as if we stumbled upon an unexpected blueprint that designs our understanding of public health.

To add a visual dimension to our discovery, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot displaying the robust correlation between the two variables. The cluster of data points forms a silhouette that proposes a connection between the architecture and the wheeze. It's almost as if the plot itself is trying to draw our attention to an architectural link to asthma, one data point at a time.

Moreover, our analysis uncovered an r-squared value of 0.9445738, indicating that the variation in asthma prevalence in American children could be explained by the number of Master's degrees awarded in Architecture and related services. This result pinpoints the architectural brush strokes that color the canvas of childhood respiratory health.

The significance of our findings was further underscored by the p-value of less than 0.01. This value signifies the strength of the relationship we unveiled, providing statistical evidence that cannot be merely brushed off. So, what did the researcher say to the statistician? "Stop making up 'p-values'; tell me the truth!"

In conclusion, our results shed light on an unexpected linkage between the field of architecture and the prevalence of asthma in American children. This discovery has the potential to breathe new life into the discourse on childhood respiratory health, offering an innovative angle for further exploration. Our findings leave us inhaling the realization that perhaps it's not just the skyscrapers that are reaching for the sky – it's the scattered data points in our plot too.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Architecture and related services and Asthma prevalence in American children. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Big Blueprints: Unearthing the Asthma-Architect Connection in American Children

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the surprising link between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Architecture and related services and the prevalence of asthma among American children. Drawing on data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the National Center for Health Statistics, we sought to wheeze out the truth behind this seemingly unlikely association. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9718919 and a p-value of less than 0.01 between the two variables, spanning the years 2012 to 2019. It's as if the architectural blueprints are leaving our little ones feeling a bit "blue" with an air of asthma. Our research adds a breath of fresh air to the dialogue on childhood asthma, shedding light on a curious juncture between the built environment and respiratory health. This work holds promise in stimulating further inquiry into the intersections of design and public health, offering a blueprint for future investigations into the curious connections beneath our noses. And who knows, maybe this research could inspire architects to create "breathtaking" structures!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The investigation of the link between Master's degrees awarded in Architecture and related services and the prevalence of asthma among American children has attracted the attention of researchers in recent years. In "Blueprints and Breathing: A Statistical Analysis," Smith et al. explore the potential impact of environmental factors, such as architectural design, on respiratory health outcomes. Their study raises thought-provoking questions about the unseen influence of the built environment on childhood asthma. Can the housing design really leave our little ones breathless, or are these findings just a lot of hot air?
Why don't we ever tell secrets on a farm? Because the potatoes have eyes and the corn has ears! Taking a closer look at the literature reveals intriguing insights from Doe and Jones in "Structural Design and Pediatric Respiratory Health." The authors delve into the intricate interactions between architectural attributes and indoor air quality, pointing to potential avenues for mitigating asthma triggers in the home environment. It seems the blueprints may hold more than just design aspirations – they might also hold the breaths of our children. It's like a who-dun-it mystery, except the culprit might just be lurking in the floor plan!
Shifting gears slightly, "The Architecture of Breathing: A Design Perspective" by Lorem Ipsum examines the psychological impact of spatial layout on children's respiratory well-being. The author uncovers the potential of architectural interventions to promote healthier breathing habits, proposing innovative approaches to architectural design that could literally "breathe" new life into asthma prevention strategies. Perhaps a well-designed building can be a breath of fresh air in more ways than one.
Connecting to the fictitious realm, the classic novel "The Asthmatic Architect" by Edgar A. Inspiration explores the trials and tribulations of an architect grappling with the challenges of respiratory health while striving to create awe-inspiring structures. While fictional, the narrative offers poignant reflections on the delicate balance between artistic expression and physical well-being in the architectural domain. It's almost as if the protagonist is trying to "draw" a balance between their love for architecture and their lung capacity.
Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! Turning to the world of films, "Breathe: The Architect's Tale" is a cinematic exploration of the bond between architectural ingenuity and respiratory health. This visually stunning tale follows the journey of an architect seeking to forge a connection between their artistic vision and the well-being of the community. It's a heartwarming yet wheezy depiction of the profound impact that architectural decisions can have on the breaths of our society.
As we navigate through the multidimensional landscape of literature on this topic, it becomes evident that the relationship between architectural factors and childhood asthma is as complex as it is surprisingly intriguing. These diverse perspectives invite us to ponder the profound yet often overlooked ways in which the design of our surroundings can shape our respiratory destinies. Will architects now need to consider asthma as well as asthetics?

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis yielded a compelling correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Architecture and related services and the prevalence of asthma in American children. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.9718919, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's as if every architectural degree added a wheezy touch to the air for our youngsters. This finding surpasses the initial surprise; it's as if we stumbled upon an unexpected blueprint that designs our understanding of public health.
To add a visual dimension to our discovery, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot displaying the robust correlation between the two variables. The cluster of data points forms a silhouette that proposes a connection between the architecture and the wheeze. It's almost as if the plot itself is trying to draw our attention to an architectural link to asthma, one data point at a time.
Moreover, our analysis uncovered an r-squared value of 0.9445738, indicating that the variation in asthma prevalence in American children could be explained by the number of Master's degrees awarded in Architecture and related services. This result pinpoints the architectural brush strokes that color the canvas of childhood respiratory health.
The significance of our findings was further underscored by the p-value of less than 0.01. This value signifies the strength of the relationship we unveiled, providing statistical evidence that cannot be merely brushed off. So, what did the researcher say to the statistician? "Stop making up 'p-values'; tell me the truth!"
In conclusion, our results shed light on an unexpected linkage between the field of architecture and the prevalence of asthma in American children. This discovery has the potential to breathe new life into the discourse on childhood respiratory health, offering an innovative angle for further exploration. Our findings leave us inhaling the realization that perhaps it's not just the skyscrapers that are reaching for the sky – it's the scattered data points in our plot too.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings provide a breath of fresh air in the realm of public health research, unveiling a compelling association between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Architecture and related services and the prevalence of asthma in American children. It seems the architectural blueprints are leaving a wheezy touch on the respiratory health of our youngsters. This unexpected revelation could prompt a reimagining of the intersections between design, built environment, and respiratory outcomes. It's as if the very air we breathe is being shaped by the strokes of architectural education – who would've thought that blueprints could hold the "asthma-atic" potential?

Our results align with prior research by Smith et al., who postulated the influence of environmental factors, including architectural design, on respiratory health outcomes. It's becoming increasingly clear that the housing design might actually be leaving our little ones breathless, and it's not just a lot of hot air after all. Moreover, the whimsically named study by Doe and Jones emphasizing the potential role of architectural attributes in determining indoor air quality is finding unexpected support in our findings. It seems the blueprints might indeed hold the breaths of our children. So as we dig deeper into the data, it turns out that the culprit might just be lurking in the floor plan after all!

But wait, there's more! Lorem Ipsum's study on the psychological impact of spatial layout on respiratory well-being resonates with our own conclusions. The potential of architectural interventions to promote healthier breathing habits might not just be a pipe dream – it could literally "breathe" new life into asthma prevention strategies. It's as if a well-designed building can be a breath of fresh air in more ways than one, offering a breeze of hope for innovative approaches to public health interventions. So, looks like architects now indeed need to consider asthma as well as aesthetics; who would've thought that calculating R-squared values could lead to R-E-S-P-I-R-E!

In essence, our findings highlight the need for a more holistic approach to public health, one that transcends traditional boundaries and embraces the multifaceted impact of the built environment on respiratory well-being. Our research offers a peek into the unexpected ways in which seemingly disparate fields can converge to shape the health landscape. As we ponder the profound yet often overlooked ways in which our surroundings can color our respiratory destinies, it's time to give a wheezy round of applause to the intersections between architecture and asthma. It's not just the skyscrapers reaching for the sky; it's the scattered data points in our plot too, painting a picture of the unseen artistry of public health and design.

In the words of our fictional friend, the asthmatic architect, "It's not just the buildings that need to breathe, it's the statistics too!" And with that, we inhale the realization that we've truly uncovered a breath-taking nexus between the architectural world and the breaths of our society.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Architecture and related services and Asthma prevalence in American children. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Big Blueprints: Unearthing the Asthma-Architect Connection in American Children

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the surprising link between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Architecture and related services and the prevalence of asthma among American children. Drawing on data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the National Center for Health Statistics, we sought to wheeze out the truth behind this seemingly unlikely association. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9718919 and a p-value of less than 0.01 between the two variables, spanning the years 2012 to 2019. It's as if the architectural blueprints are leaving our little ones feeling a bit "blue" with an air of asthma. Our research adds a breath of fresh air to the dialogue on childhood asthma, shedding light on a curious juncture between the built environment and respiratory health. This work holds promise in stimulating further inquiry into the intersections of design and public health, offering a blueprint for future investigations into the curious connections beneath our noses. And who knows, maybe this research could inspire architects to create "breathtaking" structures!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the world of research, one often stumbles upon unexpected connections, like finding out that the number of Master's degrees awarded in Architecture and related services may have an inhale-able impact on the prevalence of asthma among American children. It's a breath of fresh air to uncover such surprising links, especially when they initially seem as unlikely as a dad joke at a scientific conference. Speaking of which, did you hear about the statistician who drowned in a river with an average depth of 3 feet? He must have taken the mean too seriously! As we embark on this research journey, let's delve into the intriguing world of childhood asthma and architectural blueprints.
Our investigation sprouted from a seed of curiosity about the potential relationship between the built environment and respiratory health. This quirky exploration goes beyond mere number-crunching; it's an attempt to bridge the gap between the concrete structures of the physical world and the ethereal breaths of our little ones. It's almost as if we're playing a real-life game of "Where's Waldo," except in this case, we're seeking the hidden relationships amidst the data points. It's like looking for the statistical needle in a haystack, only this needle might help us sew together a clearer picture of childhood asthma prevention. Why did the statistician get cold during the walk? Because he forgot to wear his "degrees"!
As we embark on this investigation, we stand on the shoulders of giants before us – the researchers who ventured into uncharted territories to unravel the mysteries of our world. We follow in the footsteps of the statistical daredevils who braved the wilds of data analysis to bring order to the chaos of variables and coefficients. They waded through rivers of p-values and trekked across mountains of standard deviations, all in pursuit of truth. Perhaps they even threw in an odd dad joke or two to lighten the daunting world of academia. After all, why should researchers have all the fun?

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis yielded a compelling correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Architecture and related services and the prevalence of asthma in American children. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.9718919, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's as if every architectural degree added a wheezy touch to the air for our youngsters. This finding surpasses the initial surprise; it's as if we stumbled upon an unexpected blueprint that designs our understanding of public health.
To add a visual dimension to our discovery, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot displaying the robust correlation between the two variables. The cluster of data points forms a silhouette that proposes a connection between the architecture and the wheeze. It's almost as if the plot itself is trying to draw our attention to an architectural link to asthma, one data point at a time.
Moreover, our analysis uncovered an r-squared value of 0.9445738, indicating that the variation in asthma prevalence in American children could be explained by the number of Master's degrees awarded in Architecture and related services. This result pinpoints the architectural brush strokes that color the canvas of childhood respiratory health.
The significance of our findings was further underscored by the p-value of less than 0.01. This value signifies the strength of the relationship we unveiled, providing statistical evidence that cannot be merely brushed off. So, what did the researcher say to the statistician? "Stop making up 'p-values'; tell me the truth!"
In conclusion, our results shed light on an unexpected linkage between the field of architecture and the prevalence of asthma in American children. This discovery has the potential to breathe new life into the discourse on childhood respiratory health, offering an innovative angle for further exploration. Our findings leave us inhaling the realization that perhaps it's not just the skyscrapers that are reaching for the sky – it's the scattered data points in our plot too.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]
In wrapping up our investigation, it's clear that the link between Master's degrees in Architecture and the prevalence of asthma in American children is no air-y fairy tale. Our findings suggest that, much like the Tower of Pisa, this connection leans in a direction that demands attention. It appears that the architectural blueprints are not only shaping buildings but also shaping the respiratory health of our young ones. It's almost as if every diploma adds another draft of wheezy air to the mix. We may have uncovered a correlation coefficient, but it seems that the real design is in the way architecture influences the breaths of our children.
As we close the windows on this study, we bring a breath of fresh air to the dialogue on childhood asthma, challenging the notion that only known variables dictate respiratory health. It's as if we've stumbled upon an architectural anomaly, like finding a blueprint for breathing in the lego set of life.
So, why did the statistician get a pet parrot to help with data analysis? To teach it to squawk "p-value, p-value!" It's not just the statistical significance, but the practical implications of our findings that make us breathe easier. Our research adds a refreshing twist to the understanding of childhood asthma, and it highlights the pressing need to consider the built environment as more than just bricks and mortar – but a potential trigger for respiratory distress.
It's like we've unearthed a treasure trove of statistical artifacts, revealing a connection that invites both surprise and curiosity. It's almost as if we've found an unexpected puzzle piece in a jigsaw of variables. But, unlike most jigsaw puzzles, this one seems to have missing pieces, and that's okay. Because, as we leap from this investigation, it's clear that there's no need for further research in this area. The connection between architecture degrees and childhood asthma prevalence needs no additional airtime; it's already a well-ventilated area of study!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Big Blueprints: Unearthing the Asthma-Architect Connection in American Children. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Pediatric Pulmonary Phenomena


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Big Blueprints: Unearthing the Asthma-Architect Connection in American Children. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Pediatric Environmental Engineering


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Big Blueprints: Unearthing the Asthma-Architect Connection in American Children with an abstract of This paper delves into the surprising link between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Architecture and related services and the prevalence of asthma among American children. Drawing on data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the National Center for Health Statistics, we sought to wheeze out the truth behind this seemingly unlikely association. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9718919 and a p-value of less than 0.01 between the two variables, spanning the years 2012 to 2019. It's as if the architectural blueprints are leaving our little ones feeling a bit "blue" with an air of asthma. Our research adds a breath of fresh air to the dialogue on childhood asthma, shedding light on a curious juncture between the built environment and respiratory health. This work holds promise in stimulating further inquiry into the intersections of design and public health, offering a blueprint for future investigations into the curious connections beneath our noses. And who knows, maybe this research could inspire architects to create "breathtaking" structures!

ChatGPT:

Master's degrees in Architecture, asthma prevalence in American children, National Center for Education Statistics, National Center for Health Statistics, correlation between architecture degrees and childhood asthma, built environment and respiratory health, design and public health intersections

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Master's degrees awarded in Architecture
Detailed data title: Master's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions in Architecture and related services
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Master's degrees awarded in Architecture

Asthma prevalence in American children
Detailed data title: Percent of children 5-17 years old in the US who have asthma
Source: National Center for Health Statistics
See what else correlates with Asthma prevalence in American children

Correlation r = 0.9718919 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9445738 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 94.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Asthma prevalence in American children) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Master's degrees awarded in Architecture) over the 8 years from 2012 through 2019.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.4E-5. 0.0000543543424745654700000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 0.0054% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 18,398 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 7 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 7 because we have two variables measured over a period of 8 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.85, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20122013201420152016201720182019
Master's degrees awarded in Architecture (Degrees awarded)84488095804880067991788372917311
Asthma prevalence in American children (Percent of children)10.79.910.29.8109.98.98.6




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([8448,8095,8048,8006,7991,7883,7291,7311,])
array_2 = np.array([10.7,9.9,10.2,9.8,10,9.9,8.9,8.6,])
array_1_name = "Master's degrees awarded in Architecture"
array_2_name = "Asthma prevalence in American children"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Cheers to you for rating this correlation!


Correlation ID: 3033 · Black Variable ID: 1312 · Red Variable ID: 1135
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0