about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,812 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in cotton in Louisiana and the second variable is The Bank of Nova Scotia's stock price (BNS).  The chart goes from 2003 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As GMO cotton production in Louisiana soared, the demand for cotton swelled, leading to higher revenues for clothing companies. This prompted investors to buy more stocks, including those of The Bank of Nova Scotia, because they saw the potential for "seeding" their portfolios with profits in the growing textile industry.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Cute cartoon ] An adorable group of anthropomorphic cotton plants with smiling faces stand proudly in a vast, sunlit field in Louisiana. Instead of the usual fluffy white fibers, their bolls are bursting with crisp dollar bills. Nearby, a team of cute, wide-eyed scientists in white lab coats looks on in amazement. Meanwhile, a digital stock ticker displays The Bank of Nova Scotia's (BNS) stock price, showing a steady rise as the cotton cash floods the market. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in cotton in Louisiana and The Bank of Nova Scotia's stock price (BNS). Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Celtic art Surrealism Cyberpunk Cute cartoon Art nouveau
ChatGPT: Cute cartoon

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in cotton in Louisiana and The Bank of Nova Scotia's stock price (BNS), in the following situation: Because the R&D team in Louisiana genetically modified the cotton to produce money instead of fibers. As a result, The Bank of Nova Scotia's stock price increased due to a sudden influx of cotton cash.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a vast cotton field in Louisiana, the plants stand tall, their leaves shimmering in the sunlight. But instead of fluffy white fibers, the cotton bolls on the plants are bursting with crisp dollar bills. A group of scientists in white lab coats looks on in amazement. Meanwhile, on a digital stock ticker, The Bank of Nova Scotia's stock price (BNS) is displayed, showing a steady rise as the cotton cash floods the market.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cute cartoon ] and depicting this scene: In a vast cotton field in Louisiana, the plants stand tall, their leaves shimmering in the sunlight. But instead of fluffy white fibers, the cotton bolls on the plants are bursting with crisp dollar bills. A group of scientists in white lab coats looks on in amazement. Meanwhile, on a digital stock ticker, The Bank of Nova Scotia's stock price (BNS) is displayed, showing a steady rise as the cotton cash floods the market. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Cute cartoon ] An adorable group of anthropomorphic cotton plants with smiling faces stand proudly in a vast, sunlit field in Louisiana. Instead of the usual fluffy white fibers, their bolls are bursting with crisp dollar bills. Nearby, a team of cute, wide-eyed scientists in white lab coats looks on in amazement. Meanwhile, a digital stock ticker displays The Bank of Nova Scotia's (BNS) stock price, showing a steady rise as the cotton cash floods the market.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in cotton in Louisiana caused The Bank of Nova Scotia's stock price (BNS) to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Seedy Business: Unraveling the Interwoven Threads of GMO Cotton and The Bank of Nova Scotia's Stock Price

The Journal of Economic Botany and Financial Markets

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Louisiana and The Bank of Nova Scotia's stock price (BNS). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8876164 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Seedy Business: Unraveling the Interwoven Threads of GMO Cotton and The Bank of Nova Scotia's Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the unlikely relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton production in Louisiana and the stock price of The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS). Our research team, eager to unravel this curious connection, harnessed data from the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to conduct a thorough analysis spanning the period from 2003 to 2022.

Our findings revealed a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8876164 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a strong association between the two seemingly distinct entities. While some may find this relationship "un-boll-weevil-able," our results point to a genuine link that cannot be dismissed as mere happenstance.

It seems that the economic forces at play are as twisted and tangled as a strand of cotton harvested from genetically modified crops. Our findings prompt us to dig deeper into this peculiar association, shedding light on a facet of the market that may have otherwise remained hidden amidst the rows of cotton plants. After all, it never hurts to have a "fiber" of knowledge about unusual correlations!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Louisiana and The Bank of Nova Scotia's stock price (BNS). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Seedy Business: Unraveling the Interwoven Threads of GMO Cotton and The Bank of Nova Scotia's Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the unlikely relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton production in Louisiana and the stock price of The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS). Our research team, eager to unravel this curious connection, harnessed data from the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to conduct a thorough analysis spanning the period from 2003 to 2022.

Our findings revealed a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8876164 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a strong association between the two seemingly distinct entities. While some may find this relationship "un-boll-weevil-able," our results point to a genuine link that cannot be dismissed as mere happenstance.

It seems that the economic forces at play are as twisted and tangled as a strand of cotton harvested from genetically modified crops. Our findings prompt us to dig deeper into this peculiar association, shedding light on a facet of the market that may have otherwise remained hidden amidst the rows of cotton plants. After all, it never hurts to have a "fiber" of knowledge about unusual correlations!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As the old saying goes, "when life gives you cotton, make connections – even if they seem a bit 'tangential' at first glance." In line with this adage, our curiosity was piqued by the unexpected interplay between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton production in Louisiana and the stock price of The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS). This unorthodox pairing led us on a statistical escapade to untangle the threads of this seedy business – pun intended.

While this association may seem as unlikely as finding a needle in a haystack, the diligent planting of data seeds and careful cultivation of statistical crops has yielded a bountiful harvest of insights. Our study, spanning nearly two decades, utilized data from the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to conduct a rigorous analysis aimed at deciphering the mysterious correlation between the growth of GMO cotton and fluctuations in the stock market.

In the world of statistics, uncovering a correlation coefficient of 0.8876164 is like stumbling upon a rare, genetically modified flower – it's statistically significant and a bit unexpected at the same time. To put it simply, it's like finding the square root of a negative number – real, but complex. Our findings not only reveal a substantial link between these seemingly disparate variables but also prompt us to question the deeper economic vines that intertwine them.

While some may view this relationship as akin to mixing oil and water, our research suggests that these seemingly unrelated elements are stirringly connected, much like the swirling, tangled strands of a cotton candy machine. Our empirical journey promises to unravel the enigma of this curious connection, shedding light on the obscure corners of the stock market and agricultural landscapes alike. After all, approaching research with humor is like conducting experiments with a "laugh-tube" – it not only lightens the atmosphere but also fosters out-of-the-box thinking.

In the realm of statistics, where significance levels and p-values reign supreme, our findings stand as a testament to the remarkable nature of unexpected associations. As we delve further into our results, it becomes clear that unraveling the intricate dance between GMO cotton and stock prices requires more than just a cursory examination – it demands a meticulous dissection akin to separating cotton fibers from their seeds. After all, in the world of research, combining humor and curious correlations is akin to mixing a "punny" caption and an unexpected discovery – the result is always worth the read.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Louisiana and The Bank of Nova Scotia's stock price (BNS). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Seedy Business: Unraveling the Interwoven Threads of GMO Cotton and The Bank of Nova Scotia's Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the unlikely relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton production in Louisiana and the stock price of The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS). Our research team, eager to unravel this curious connection, harnessed data from the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to conduct a thorough analysis spanning the period from 2003 to 2022.

Our findings revealed a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8876164 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a strong association between the two seemingly distinct entities. While some may find this relationship "un-boll-weevil-able," our results point to a genuine link that cannot be dismissed as mere happenstance.

It seems that the economic forces at play are as twisted and tangled as a strand of cotton harvested from genetically modified crops. Our findings prompt us to dig deeper into this peculiar association, shedding light on a facet of the market that may have otherwise remained hidden amidst the rows of cotton plants. After all, it never hurts to have a "fiber" of knowledge about unusual correlations!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the old saying goes, "when life gives you cotton, make connections – even if they seem a bit 'tangential' at first glance." In line with this adage, our curiosity was piqued by the unexpected interplay between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton production in Louisiana and the stock price of The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS). This unorthodox pairing led us on a statistical escapade to untangle the threads of this seedy business – pun intended.
While this association may seem as unlikely as finding a needle in a haystack, the diligent planting of data seeds and careful cultivation of statistical crops has yielded a bountiful harvest of insights. Our study, spanning nearly two decades, utilized data from the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to conduct a rigorous analysis aimed at deciphering the mysterious correlation between the growth of GMO cotton and fluctuations in the stock market.
In the world of statistics, uncovering a correlation coefficient of 0.8876164 is like stumbling upon a rare, genetically modified flower – it's statistically significant and a bit unexpected at the same time. To put it simply, it's like finding the square root of a negative number – real, but complex. Our findings not only reveal a substantial link between these seemingly disparate variables but also prompt us to question the deeper economic vines that intertwine them.
While some may view this relationship as akin to mixing oil and water, our research suggests that these seemingly unrelated elements are stirringly connected, much like the swirling, tangled strands of a cotton candy machine. Our empirical journey promises to unravel the enigma of this curious connection, shedding light on the obscure corners of the stock market and agricultural landscapes alike. After all, approaching research with humor is like conducting experiments with a "laugh-tube" – it not only lightens the atmosphere but also fosters out-of-the-box thinking.
In the realm of statistics, where significance levels and p-values reign supreme, our findings stand as a testament to the remarkable nature of unexpected associations. As we delve further into our results, it becomes clear that unraveling the intricate dance between GMO cotton and stock prices requires more than just a cursory examination – it demands a meticulous dissection akin to separating cotton fibers from their seeds. After all, in the world of research, combining humor and curious correlations is akin to mixing a "punny" caption and an unexpected discovery – the result is always worth the read.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Several studies have examined the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agricultural production and various economic indicators. Smith et al., in "Agricultural Economics," found a positive correlation between the adoption of GMOs and increased yields, highlighting the potential economic benefits of such technology. However, Doe's work in "Journal of Market Analysis" suggests a need for caution, as the impact of GMOs on market prices remains a subject of debate.

Novel correlations, such as the one explored in this study, often invite skepticism and disbelief. However, Jones and colleagues, in "Economic Perspectives," emphasize the importance of exploring unconventional connections, as they may unveil hidden patterns that defy conventional wisdom. As our investigation ventured into uncharted territory, we encountered a plethora of unexpected findings that would make even the most seasoned statistician do a double take – it's a statistical "plot twist"!

Turning to non-fiction literature, works such as "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "Seeds of Change" by Jennifer A. Thomson provide insights into the complexities of agricultural practices and the broader implications of genetic modification. However, it was the fictitious realm that unexpectedly shed light on the seemingly improbable link between GMO cotton and stock prices. Books such as "Cotton Malone Series" by Steve Berry and "The Banker's Wife" by Cristina Alger, while not directly related to our research, added an air of mystery and intrigue to our exploration of this unusual connection. It's as if Sherlock Holmes decided to investigate a statistical mystery – elementary, my dear data analyst!

In our quest for understanding, we turned to popular television shows such as "Mad Money with Jim Cramer" and "America's Test Kitchen" for inspiration. While these programs may not directly address the correlation between GMO cotton and stock prices, they provided valuable insights into financial trends and agricultural innovations. Who knew that binge-watching financial news and cooking segments could be part of serious academic research? It's an unexpected blend of Wall Street and cotton fields – a "stockbroker stew," if you will.

In a research landscape filled with serious analyses and rigorous methodologies, our study aims to inject a bit of levity and creativity, reminding fellow researchers that even the most unlikely connections can yield valuable insights. After all, uncovering unexpected correlations is like finding a hidden treasure – it's both thrilling and a bit "punny"!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Louisiana and The Bank of Nova Scotia's stock price (BNS). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2003 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Seedy Business: Unraveling the Interwoven Threads of GMO Cotton and The Bank of Nova Scotia's Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the unlikely relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton production in Louisiana and the stock price of The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS). Our research team, eager to unravel this curious connection, harnessed data from the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to conduct a thorough analysis spanning the period from 2003 to 2022.

Our findings revealed a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8876164 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a strong association between the two seemingly distinct entities. While some may find this relationship "un-boll-weevil-able," our results point to a genuine link that cannot be dismissed as mere happenstance.

It seems that the economic forces at play are as twisted and tangled as a strand of cotton harvested from genetically modified crops. Our findings prompt us to dig deeper into this peculiar association, shedding light on a facet of the market that may have otherwise remained hidden amidst the rows of cotton plants. After all, it never hurts to have a "fiber" of knowledge about unusual correlations!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the old saying goes, "when life gives you cotton, make connections – even if they seem a bit 'tangential' at first glance." In line with this adage, our curiosity was piqued by the unexpected interplay between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton production in Louisiana and the stock price of The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS). This unorthodox pairing led us on a statistical escapade to untangle the threads of this seedy business – pun intended.
While this association may seem as unlikely as finding a needle in a haystack, the diligent planting of data seeds and careful cultivation of statistical crops has yielded a bountiful harvest of insights. Our study, spanning nearly two decades, utilized data from the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to conduct a rigorous analysis aimed at deciphering the mysterious correlation between the growth of GMO cotton and fluctuations in the stock market.
In the world of statistics, uncovering a correlation coefficient of 0.8876164 is like stumbling upon a rare, genetically modified flower – it's statistically significant and a bit unexpected at the same time. To put it simply, it's like finding the square root of a negative number – real, but complex. Our findings not only reveal a substantial link between these seemingly disparate variables but also prompt us to question the deeper economic vines that intertwine them.
While some may view this relationship as akin to mixing oil and water, our research suggests that these seemingly unrelated elements are stirringly connected, much like the swirling, tangled strands of a cotton candy machine. Our empirical journey promises to unravel the enigma of this curious connection, shedding light on the obscure corners of the stock market and agricultural landscapes alike. After all, approaching research with humor is like conducting experiments with a "laugh-tube" – it not only lightens the atmosphere but also fosters out-of-the-box thinking.
In the realm of statistics, where significance levels and p-values reign supreme, our findings stand as a testament to the remarkable nature of unexpected associations. As we delve further into our results, it becomes clear that unraveling the intricate dance between GMO cotton and stock prices requires more than just a cursory examination – it demands a meticulous dissection akin to separating cotton fibers from their seeds. After all, in the world of research, combining humor and curious correlations is akin to mixing a "punny" caption and an unexpected discovery – the result is always worth the read.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To delve into the enigmatic connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton production in Louisiana and the stock price of The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS), our research team embarked on a statistical odyssey that would make even Odysseus proud. Our data cultivation process involved harvesting information from the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), which, contrary to popular belief, did not require us to don overalls and wield a statistical scythe.

To kick things off, we gathered historical data on GMO cotton usage in Louisiana from 2003 to 2022. As we waded through the sea of data, we were reminded of the old adage: "Statistics are like sausages – it's better not to see them being made." However, we remained undeterred, never losing sight of our research goals amidst the statistical meat grinder.

Next, we set our sights on The Bank of Nova Scotia's stock price (BNS) and meticulously extracted market data corresponding to the same timeframe. This process bore resemblance to tending a statistical garden – sowing the seeds of data, watering them with diligence, and hoping for a bountiful harvest of insights.

Not content with stopping at mere data collection, we employed sophisticated statistical techniques to scrutinize the relationship between these disparate variables. Our methods included regression analysis, correlation tests, and principle component analysis, which some might liken to unleashing a statistical whirlwind on the market and agricultural landscapes. It was akin to performing a high-stakes statistical tango, all in pursuit of uncovering the hidden choreography between GMO cotton and stock prices.

Moreover, we employed advanced econometric models to assess the impact of GMO cotton usage on fluctuations in The Bank of Nova Scotia's stock price. This was akin to combining the precision of a Swiss watch with the unpredictability of statistical probabilities – a unique fusion that redefined the boundaries of economic analysis.

Finally, our analysis was subjected to rigorous sensitivity tests and robustness checks to ensure the reliability and validity of our findings. This process was reminiscent of conducting an empirical stress test on our statistical hypotheses – ensuring that they could weather any storm of skepticism and scrutiny.

In summary, our methodological approach was not all statistical "biz-casual" – it was a carefully orchestrated symphony of data collection, rigorous analysis, and meticulous validation. After all, in the realm of research, unraveling the unexpected threads of correlation demands both scientific rigor and a sprinkle of statistical wit.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Louisiana and The Bank of Nova Scotia's stock price (BNS). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .

For the time period 2003 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8876164, r-squared of 0.7878629, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Seedy Business: Unraveling the Interwoven Threads of GMO Cotton and The Bank of Nova Scotia's Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the unlikely relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton production in Louisiana and the stock price of The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS). Our research team, eager to unravel this curious connection, harnessed data from the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to conduct a thorough analysis spanning the period from 2003 to 2022.

Our findings revealed a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8876164 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a strong association between the two seemingly distinct entities. While some may find this relationship "un-boll-weevil-able," our results point to a genuine link that cannot be dismissed as mere happenstance.

It seems that the economic forces at play are as twisted and tangled as a strand of cotton harvested from genetically modified crops. Our findings prompt us to dig deeper into this peculiar association, shedding light on a facet of the market that may have otherwise remained hidden amidst the rows of cotton plants. After all, it never hurts to have a "fiber" of knowledge about unusual correlations!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As the old saying goes, "when life gives you cotton, make connections – even if they seem a bit 'tangential' at first glance." In line with this adage, our curiosity was piqued by the unexpected interplay between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton production in Louisiana and the stock price of The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS). This unorthodox pairing led us on a statistical escapade to untangle the threads of this seedy business – pun intended.
While this association may seem as unlikely as finding a needle in a haystack, the diligent planting of data seeds and careful cultivation of statistical crops has yielded a bountiful harvest of insights. Our study, spanning nearly two decades, utilized data from the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to conduct a rigorous analysis aimed at deciphering the mysterious correlation between the growth of GMO cotton and fluctuations in the stock market.
In the world of statistics, uncovering a correlation coefficient of 0.8876164 is like stumbling upon a rare, genetically modified flower – it's statistically significant and a bit unexpected at the same time. To put it simply, it's like finding the square root of a negative number – real, but complex. Our findings not only reveal a substantial link between these seemingly disparate variables but also prompt us to question the deeper economic vines that intertwine them.
While some may view this relationship as akin to mixing oil and water, our research suggests that these seemingly unrelated elements are stirringly connected, much like the swirling, tangled strands of a cotton candy machine. Our empirical journey promises to unravel the enigma of this curious connection, shedding light on the obscure corners of the stock market and agricultural landscapes alike. After all, approaching research with humor is like conducting experiments with a "laugh-tube" – it not only lightens the atmosphere but also fosters out-of-the-box thinking.
In the realm of statistics, where significance levels and p-values reign supreme, our findings stand as a testament to the remarkable nature of unexpected associations. As we delve further into our results, it becomes clear that unraveling the intricate dance between GMO cotton and stock prices requires more than just a cursory examination – it demands a meticulous dissection akin to separating cotton fibers from their seeds. After all, in the world of research, combining humor and curious correlations is akin to mixing a "punny" caption and an unexpected discovery – the result is always worth the read.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton production in Louisiana and The Bank of Nova Scotia's stock price (BNS) from 2003 to 2022 yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8876164, indicating a strong positive relationship between the two variables. This substantial correlation may just make you want to (cotton) pick a stock!

The r-squared value of 0.7878629 further accentuates the significance of this connection, suggesting that approximately 78.79% of the variability in BNS stock price can be explained by the changes in the use of GMO cotton in Louisiana. This result is quite "seed-ling" considering the unexpected nature of the relationship.

The p-value of less than 0.01 adds to the robustness of our findings, indicating that the observed correlation is highly statistically significant and not merely a "fluff" of coincidence. It seems that the link between GMO cotton and BNS stock price is as strong as the fibers that make up a bale of cotton!

Fig. 1 visually illustrates the noteworthy correlation between the use of GMO cotton in Louisiana and BNS stock price. The scatterplot resembles a carefully woven pattern, highlighting the tight bond between these two ostensibly unrelated variables. It's as if the data points are threads in the fabric of our analysis - a true "textile" for success!

In conclusion, the results of our investigation suggest a compelling association between GMO cotton use in Louisiana and fluctuations in The Bank of Nova Scotia's stock price. This unexpected and noteworthy finding warrants further exploration, as it unravels an intriguing aspect of the economic landscape that might otherwise have remained concealed. After all, sometimes the most "punny" connections yield the most groundbreaking insights in research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Louisiana and The Bank of Nova Scotia's stock price (BNS). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Seedy Business: Unraveling the Interwoven Threads of GMO Cotton and The Bank of Nova Scotia's Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the unlikely relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton production in Louisiana and the stock price of The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS). Our research team, eager to unravel this curious connection, harnessed data from the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to conduct a thorough analysis spanning the period from 2003 to 2022.

Our findings revealed a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8876164 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a strong association between the two seemingly distinct entities. While some may find this relationship "un-boll-weevil-able," our results point to a genuine link that cannot be dismissed as mere happenstance.

It seems that the economic forces at play are as twisted and tangled as a strand of cotton harvested from genetically modified crops. Our findings prompt us to dig deeper into this peculiar association, shedding light on a facet of the market that may have otherwise remained hidden amidst the rows of cotton plants. After all, it never hurts to have a "fiber" of knowledge about unusual correlations!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Several studies have examined the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agricultural production and various economic indicators. Smith et al., in "Agricultural Economics," found a positive correlation between the adoption of GMOs and increased yields, highlighting the potential economic benefits of such technology. However, Doe's work in "Journal of Market Analysis" suggests a need for caution, as the impact of GMOs on market prices remains a subject of debate.
Novel correlations, such as the one explored in this study, often invite skepticism and disbelief. However, Jones and colleagues, in "Economic Perspectives," emphasize the importance of exploring unconventional connections, as they may unveil hidden patterns that defy conventional wisdom. As our investigation ventured into uncharted territory, we encountered a plethora of unexpected findings that would make even the most seasoned statistician do a double take – it's a statistical "plot twist"!
Turning to non-fiction literature, works such as "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "Seeds of Change" by Jennifer A. Thomson provide insights into the complexities of agricultural practices and the broader implications of genetic modification. However, it was the fictitious realm that unexpectedly shed light on the seemingly improbable link between GMO cotton and stock prices. Books such as "Cotton Malone Series" by Steve Berry and "The Banker's Wife" by Cristina Alger, while not directly related to our research, added an air of mystery and intrigue to our exploration of this unusual connection. It's as if Sherlock Holmes decided to investigate a statistical mystery – elementary, my dear data analyst!
In our quest for understanding, we turned to popular television shows such as "Mad Money with Jim Cramer" and "America's Test Kitchen" for inspiration. While these programs may not directly address the correlation between GMO cotton and stock prices, they provided valuable insights into financial trends and agricultural innovations. Who knew that binge-watching financial news and cooking segments could be part of serious academic research? It's an unexpected blend of Wall Street and cotton fields – a "stockbroker stew," if you will.
In a research landscape filled with serious analyses and rigorous methodologies, our study aims to inject a bit of levity and creativity, reminding fellow researchers that even the most unlikely connections can yield valuable insights. After all, uncovering unexpected correlations is like finding a hidden treasure – it's both thrilling and a bit "punny"!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton production in Louisiana and The Bank of Nova Scotia's stock price (BNS) from 2003 to 2022 yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8876164, indicating a strong positive relationship between the two variables. This substantial correlation may just make you want to (cotton) pick a stock!
The r-squared value of 0.7878629 further accentuates the significance of this connection, suggesting that approximately 78.79% of the variability in BNS stock price can be explained by the changes in the use of GMO cotton in Louisiana. This result is quite "seed-ling" considering the unexpected nature of the relationship.
The p-value of less than 0.01 adds to the robustness of our findings, indicating that the observed correlation is highly statistically significant and not merely a "fluff" of coincidence. It seems that the link between GMO cotton and BNS stock price is as strong as the fibers that make up a bale of cotton!
Fig. 1 visually illustrates the noteworthy correlation between the use of GMO cotton in Louisiana and BNS stock price. The scatterplot resembles a carefully woven pattern, highlighting the tight bond between these two ostensibly unrelated variables. It's as if the data points are threads in the fabric of our analysis - a true "textile" for success!
In conclusion, the results of our investigation suggest a compelling association between GMO cotton use in Louisiana and fluctuations in The Bank of Nova Scotia's stock price. This unexpected and noteworthy finding warrants further exploration, as it unravels an intriguing aspect of the economic landscape that might otherwise have remained concealed. After all, sometimes the most "punny" connections yield the most groundbreaking insights in research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The robust correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton production in Louisiana and The Bank of Nova Scotia's stock price (BNS) unearthed in our study has sown the seeds of curiosity and contemplation among both researchers and market analysts. Our findings not only corroborate the earlier research asserting the potential economic impact of GMOs but add a silky layer of nuance by revealing their unexpected association with stock prices.

Our results echo the sentiments espoused by Smith et al., whose work illuminated the positive link between GMO adoption and increased agricultural yields. It appears that the economic repercussions of GMO adoption extend beyond the fields and into the stock market, providing a wealth of insights into the far-reaching influence of this technology. It's as if GMOs are the ultimate multitaskers – boosting yields in the soil and stock prices on Wall Street!

Likewise, our findings subtly nod to Jones and colleagues' emphasis on exploring unconventional connections. The unexpected correlation between GMO cotton and stock prices is akin to stumbling upon a scientific Easter egg, challenging the conventional wisdom of economic analysis. It's almost as if we've discovered a new "genetic" mutation in the fabric of market dynamics – a delightfully unexpected plot twist, indeed!

The statistical significance and strong correlation coefficient align with our predecessors' assertions, reinforcing the validity of our findings. The p-value of less than 0.01 serves as a resounding "statistically significant" stamp, signaling that the observed relationship is no mere statistical anomaly but a genuine thread woven into the fabric of economic influences. Perhaps GMOs are not just genetically modified organisms but also "groundbreaking market orchestrators"!

Additionally, our study's unearthing of this unusual association adds a touch of intrigue to the research landscape. It's as if we've unearthed a buried treasure of statistical curiosity, reminiscent of a Sherlock Holmes mystery with a statistical twist. The unexpected fusion of agriculture and finance has us all questioning the boundaries of research exploration, showing that even the most divergent topics can lead to unexpected "bales" of knowledge.

In summary, our investigation has not only shed light on the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate economic variables but has also unearthed a fertile ground for further exploration. The "punny" connections found in our research serve as a delightful reminder that, in the world of statistical analysis, the most unexpected correlations can yield the most illuminating insights.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Louisiana and The Bank of Nova Scotia's stock price (BNS). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Seedy Business: Unraveling the Interwoven Threads of GMO Cotton and The Bank of Nova Scotia's Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the unlikely relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton production in Louisiana and the stock price of The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS). Our research team, eager to unravel this curious connection, harnessed data from the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to conduct a thorough analysis spanning the period from 2003 to 2022.

Our findings revealed a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8876164 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a strong association between the two seemingly distinct entities. While some may find this relationship "un-boll-weevil-able," our results point to a genuine link that cannot be dismissed as mere happenstance.

It seems that the economic forces at play are as twisted and tangled as a strand of cotton harvested from genetically modified crops. Our findings prompt us to dig deeper into this peculiar association, shedding light on a facet of the market that may have otherwise remained hidden amidst the rows of cotton plants. After all, it never hurts to have a "fiber" of knowledge about unusual correlations!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As the old saying goes, "when life gives you cotton, make connections – even if they seem a bit 'tangential' at first glance." In line with this adage, our curiosity was piqued by the unexpected interplay between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton production in Louisiana and the stock price of The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS). This unorthodox pairing led us on a statistical escapade to untangle the threads of this seedy business – pun intended.
While this association may seem as unlikely as finding a needle in a haystack, the diligent planting of data seeds and careful cultivation of statistical crops has yielded a bountiful harvest of insights. Our study, spanning nearly two decades, utilized data from the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to conduct a rigorous analysis aimed at deciphering the mysterious correlation between the growth of GMO cotton and fluctuations in the stock market.
In the world of statistics, uncovering a correlation coefficient of 0.8876164 is like stumbling upon a rare, genetically modified flower – it's statistically significant and a bit unexpected at the same time. To put it simply, it's like finding the square root of a negative number – real, but complex. Our findings not only reveal a substantial link between these seemingly disparate variables but also prompt us to question the deeper economic vines that intertwine them.
While some may view this relationship as akin to mixing oil and water, our research suggests that these seemingly unrelated elements are stirringly connected, much like the swirling, tangled strands of a cotton candy machine. Our empirical journey promises to unravel the enigma of this curious connection, shedding light on the obscure corners of the stock market and agricultural landscapes alike. After all, approaching research with humor is like conducting experiments with a "laugh-tube" – it not only lightens the atmosphere but also fosters out-of-the-box thinking.
In the realm of statistics, where significance levels and p-values reign supreme, our findings stand as a testament to the remarkable nature of unexpected associations. As we delve further into our results, it becomes clear that unraveling the intricate dance between GMO cotton and stock prices requires more than just a cursory examination – it demands a meticulous dissection akin to separating cotton fibers from their seeds. After all, in the world of research, combining humor and curious correlations is akin to mixing a "punny" caption and an unexpected discovery – the result is always worth the read.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton production in Louisiana and The Bank of Nova Scotia's stock price (BNS) from 2003 to 2022 yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.8876164, indicating a strong positive relationship between the two variables. This substantial correlation may just make you want to (cotton) pick a stock!
The r-squared value of 0.7878629 further accentuates the significance of this connection, suggesting that approximately 78.79% of the variability in BNS stock price can be explained by the changes in the use of GMO cotton in Louisiana. This result is quite "seed-ling" considering the unexpected nature of the relationship.
The p-value of less than 0.01 adds to the robustness of our findings, indicating that the observed correlation is highly statistically significant and not merely a "fluff" of coincidence. It seems that the link between GMO cotton and BNS stock price is as strong as the fibers that make up a bale of cotton!
Fig. 1 visually illustrates the noteworthy correlation between the use of GMO cotton in Louisiana and BNS stock price. The scatterplot resembles a carefully woven pattern, highlighting the tight bond between these two ostensibly unrelated variables. It's as if the data points are threads in the fabric of our analysis - a true "textile" for success!
In conclusion, the results of our investigation suggest a compelling association between GMO cotton use in Louisiana and fluctuations in The Bank of Nova Scotia's stock price. This unexpected and noteworthy finding warrants further exploration, as it unravels an intriguing aspect of the economic landscape that might otherwise have remained concealed. After all, sometimes the most "punny" connections yield the most groundbreaking insights in research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has "unraveled" a surprisingly robust correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton production in Louisiana and the stock price of The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS). It seems that the economic seeds sown in the agricultural fields of Louisiana have indeed borne fruit in the stock market – a true "commodity" of unexpected connections!

Our findings, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8876164 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, have sown the seeds for further exploration into this "GMO-mathical" relationship. It appears that delving into the realm of GMO cotton and its impact on stock prices is not only fruitful but also "bale-ing" us over with its unexpected significance.

This peculiar connection, much like a well-crafted dad joke, demands attention and further investigation. However, as much as we'd love to keep "picking" at this topic, our research leads us to assert that no more inquiry is needed in this area - we've certainly stitched together enough evidence to "cotton" on to this intriguing association!

After all, in the world of statistics, where the "knit"work of correlations often leads to unexpected patterns, our study has woven a narrative as unique as a DNA strand, shedding light on the hidden links between cotton cultivation and stock market dynamics. It's been a "ginned" pleasure to delve into this seedy business, and we leave it in the hands of future researchers to continue the thread of inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Seedy Business: Unraveling the Interwoven Threads of GMO Cotton and The Bank of Nova Scotia's Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Economic Botany and Financial Markets


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Seedy Business: Unraveling the Interwoven Threads of GMO Cotton and The Bank of Nova Scotia's Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Agricultural Economics and Global Finance (SAEGF)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Seedy Business: Unraveling the Interwoven Threads of GMO Cotton and The Bank of Nova Scotia's Stock Price with an abstract of In this study, we delve into the unlikely relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton production in Louisiana and the stock price of The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS). Our research team, eager to unravel this curious connection, harnessed data from the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to conduct a thorough analysis spanning the period from 2003 to 2022.

Our findings revealed a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8876164 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, suggesting a strong association between the two seemingly distinct entities. While some may find this relationship "un-boll-weevil-able," our results point to a genuine link that cannot be dismissed as mere happenstance.
It seems that the economic forces at play are as twisted and tangled as a strand of cotton harvested from genetically modified crops. Our findings prompt us to dig deeper into this peculiar association, shedding light on a facet of the market that may have otherwise remained hidden amidst the rows of cotton plants. After all, it never hurts to have a "fiber" of knowledge about unusual correlations!

ChatGPT:

GMO cotton, Bank of Nova Scotia stock price, Louisiana cotton production, genetically modified organisms, USDA data, LSEG Analytics, Refinitiv, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, economic forces, market correlations, cotton production analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in cotton in Louisiana
Detailed data title: Percent of cotton planted in Louisiana genetically modified with both Bt and HT
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in cotton in Louisiana

The Bank of Nova Scotia's stock price (BNS)
Detailed data title: Opening price of The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function

See what else correlates with The Bank of Nova Scotia's stock price (BNS)

Correlation r = 0.8876164 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7878629 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 78.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The Bank of Nova Scotia's stock price (BNS)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in cotton in Louisiana) over the 20 years from 2003 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.8E-7. 0.0000001794400892640141000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.89 in 1.8E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 5,572,891 random variables You don't actually need 5 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.73, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in cotton in Louisiana (GMO cotton %)9193959496989395979798999998999999999999
The Bank of Nova Scotia's stock price (BNS) (Stock price)16.8225.4433.9939.8544.8250.7327.1147.5157.8550.6459.0462.5556.3639.8256.164.5849.5156.653.6170.73




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([91,93,95,94,96,98,93,95,97,97,98,99,99,98,99,99,99,99,99,99,])
array_2 = np.array([16.82,25.44,33.99,39.85,44.82,50.73,27.11,47.51,57.85,50.64,59.04,62.55,56.36,39.82,56.1,64.58,49.51,56.6,53.61,70.73,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in cotton in Louisiana"
array_2_name = "The Bank of Nova Scotia's stock price (BNS)"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm grateful for your review!


Correlation ID: 2812 · Black Variable ID: 806 · Red Variable ID: 1710
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0