about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,589 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The distance between Jupiter and Venus and the second variable is Points Scored by the losing team in the Super Bowl.  The chart goes from 1975 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the gravitational pull between the two distant planets fluctuates, it creates a ripple effect on the Earth's atmosphere. This cosmic dance somehow results in a small but measurable boost in the losing team's morale, leading to slightly better performance on the field. It's like the universe's way of saying, "Hey, it's okay to lose, here's a little extra cosmic energy to soften the blow!"

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image of a serene field at night, where friends are gathered using binoculars to observe the night sky. In the distance, Jupiter and Venus are visible, glittering brightly with the distance between them clearly evident. Additionally, include a game of football played under the floodlights, with one team scoring a touchdown in the final seconds, adding to their points tally in the Super Bowl. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The distance between Jupiter and Venus and Points Scored by the losing team in the Super Bowl. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: a Polaroid photo Concept art Data cyber art Art nouveau A scene from Skyrim
ChatGPT: A scene from Skyrim

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The distance between Jupiter and Venus and Points Scored by the losing team in the Super Bowl together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A group of friends gathers in a large field, using binoculars to observe the night sky. Jupiter and Venus are visible, glittering brightly with the distance between them clearly evident. Meanwhile, in the background, a game of football is being played under the floodlights. The losing team scores a touchdown in the final seconds, adding to their points tally in the Super Bowl.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A scene from Skyrim ] and depicting this scene: A group of friends gathers in a large field, using binoculars to observe the night sky. Jupiter and Venus are visible, glittering brightly with the distance between them clearly evident. Meanwhile, in the background, a game of football is being played under the floodlights. The losing team scores a touchdown in the final seconds, adding to their points tally in the Super Bowl. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image of a serene field at night, where friends are gathered using binoculars to observe the night sky. In the distance, Jupiter and Venus are visible, glittering brightly with the distance between them clearly evident. Additionally, include a game of football played under the floodlights, with one team scoring a touchdown in the final seconds, adding to their points tally in the Super Bowl.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The distance between Jupiter and Venus caused Points Scored by the losing team in the Super Bowl to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.05)
Looking to the Stars: The Celestial Anomaly of Jupiter, Venus, and Super Bowl Defeat

The Astrological Journal of Interplanetary Anomalies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Jupiter and Venus and Points Scored by the losing team in the Super Bowl. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Caclculated using Astropy and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.3383857 and p < 0.05 for 1975 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Looking to the Stars: The Celestial Anomaly of Jupiter, Venus, and Super Bowl Defeat

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the peculiar relationship between the distance separating Jupiter and Venus as observed in the night sky and the total points scored by the losing team in the Super Bowl. The inspiration for this research stemmed from a lighthearted conversation among colleagues, where someone jokingly questioned if the gravitational pull of outer planets could potentially influence the outcome of a football game (or vice versa). To our surprise, our analysis utilizing data from Astropy and Wikipedia revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.3383857 and p < 0.05 for the years spanning from 1975 to 2022. Remarkably, this celestial anomaly seems to have a slight but statistically significant connection to the performance of the losing team in the Super Bowl.

This unexpected discovery serves as a reminder that sometimes, the universe's influence can extend far beyond the reach of our comprehension. It also conjures up a cheesy dad joke: "Why did the losing quarterback spend so much time staring at the stars? He was trying to find a celestial explanation for his team's defeat!" The findings of this study may prompt further investigation into the mysterious interplay between astronomical phenomena and earthly events, leaving us pondering whether the "eyes in the sky" are secretly influencing athletic outcomes.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Jupiter and Venus and Points Scored by the losing team in the Super Bowl. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Looking to the Stars: The Celestial Anomaly of Jupiter, Venus, and Super Bowl Defeat

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the peculiar relationship between the distance separating Jupiter and Venus as observed in the night sky and the total points scored by the losing team in the Super Bowl. The inspiration for this research stemmed from a lighthearted conversation among colleagues, where someone jokingly questioned if the gravitational pull of outer planets could potentially influence the outcome of a football game (or vice versa). To our surprise, our analysis utilizing data from Astropy and Wikipedia revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.3383857 and p < 0.05 for the years spanning from 1975 to 2022. Remarkably, this celestial anomaly seems to have a slight but statistically significant connection to the performance of the losing team in the Super Bowl.

This unexpected discovery serves as a reminder that sometimes, the universe's influence can extend far beyond the reach of our comprehension. It also conjures up a cheesy dad joke: "Why did the losing quarterback spend so much time staring at the stars? He was trying to find a celestial explanation for his team's defeat!" The findings of this study may prompt further investigation into the mysterious interplay between astronomical phenomena and earthly events, leaving us pondering whether the "eyes in the sky" are secretly influencing athletic outcomes.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Introduction

The realm of scientific inquiry often leads us into uncharted territories, where the boundaries of plausibility are tested and unexpected connections can emerge. It is in this spirit of open-minded exploration that we delved into the curious convergence of celestial bodies and athletic competition. As the old adage goes, "When the moon hits your eye like a big pizza pie, that's amore"—or in our case, that's science! Similarly, we pondered, can the celestial dance between Jupiter and Venus have an impact on the gridiron battleground of the Super Bowl? It sounds like a punchline to a cosmic joke, but our investigation has unveiled some intriguing insights.

In the world of statistical analysis, researchers often seek to uncover correlations between seemingly disparate variables. From the heights of the Himalayas to the depths of the Mariana Trench, from the subatomic particle to the expanding universe, every facet of existence can potentially be linked through the lens of statistical inquiry. It's a mystery, wrapped in a p-value, inside an enigma! So, with the methodology of astrophysical observation and the rigor of statistical analysis at our disposal, we embarked on a quest to unearth the potential connection between the distance separating Jupiter and Venus and the fate of the losing team in the biggest event in American football.

Without a doubt, the harmonious alignment of celestial bodies has captured the imagination of humanity for eons. From the theorems of ancient astronomers to the spacefaring aspirations of modern civilization, the allure of the stars remains undiminished. We're inclined to say that the strong pull of gravitational forces might even rival the allure of bad puns—like, "Why don't astronomers ever play hide and seek? Because good luck hiding when you're always being observed!" But we recognize the gravity of our study and the unexpected implications it may hold.

As we embark on this cosmic journey of discovery, it's worth considering the narrative potential inherent in the confluence of the otherworldly and the terrestrial. The drama of a celestial ballet influencing the course of a football contest may seem too extraordinary to believe, like a quarterback attempting a Hail Mary pass from Saturn. However, if our findings reveal a tangible link, it would mean that the stars themselves have a stake in the outcome of our earthly games. It brings to mind the classic dad joke: "Why did the football coach go to outer space? To improve his team's astro-nomical performance!"

In the following sections, we present our methodology, findings, and implications, shedding light on the surprising correlation between distant planets and the realm of athletic competition. After all, science has always been about pushing boundaries, challenging assumptions, and, most importantly, finding the humor in the unexpected. Let's boldly go where football statisticians have never gone before!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Jupiter and Venus and Points Scored by the losing team in the Super Bowl. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Looking to the Stars: The Celestial Anomaly of Jupiter, Venus, and Super Bowl Defeat

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the peculiar relationship between the distance separating Jupiter and Venus as observed in the night sky and the total points scored by the losing team in the Super Bowl. The inspiration for this research stemmed from a lighthearted conversation among colleagues, where someone jokingly questioned if the gravitational pull of outer planets could potentially influence the outcome of a football game (or vice versa). To our surprise, our analysis utilizing data from Astropy and Wikipedia revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.3383857 and p < 0.05 for the years spanning from 1975 to 2022. Remarkably, this celestial anomaly seems to have a slight but statistically significant connection to the performance of the losing team in the Super Bowl.

This unexpected discovery serves as a reminder that sometimes, the universe's influence can extend far beyond the reach of our comprehension. It also conjures up a cheesy dad joke: "Why did the losing quarterback spend so much time staring at the stars? He was trying to find a celestial explanation for his team's defeat!" The findings of this study may prompt further investigation into the mysterious interplay between astronomical phenomena and earthly events, leaving us pondering whether the "eyes in the sky" are secretly influencing athletic outcomes.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
The realm of scientific inquiry often leads us into uncharted territories, where the boundaries of plausibility are tested and unexpected connections can emerge. It is in this spirit of open-minded exploration that we delved into the curious convergence of celestial bodies and athletic competition. As the old adage goes, "When the moon hits your eye like a big pizza pie, that's amore"—or in our case, that's science! Similarly, we pondered, can the celestial dance between Jupiter and Venus have an impact on the gridiron battleground of the Super Bowl? It sounds like a punchline to a cosmic joke, but our investigation has unveiled some intriguing insights.
In the world of statistical analysis, researchers often seek to uncover correlations between seemingly disparate variables. From the heights of the Himalayas to the depths of the Mariana Trench, from the subatomic particle to the expanding universe, every facet of existence can potentially be linked through the lens of statistical inquiry. It's a mystery, wrapped in a p-value, inside an enigma! So, with the methodology of astrophysical observation and the rigor of statistical analysis at our disposal, we embarked on a quest to unearth the potential connection between the distance separating Jupiter and Venus and the fate of the losing team in the biggest event in American football.
Without a doubt, the harmonious alignment of celestial bodies has captured the imagination of humanity for eons. From the theorems of ancient astronomers to the spacefaring aspirations of modern civilization, the allure of the stars remains undiminished. We're inclined to say that the strong pull of gravitational forces might even rival the allure of bad puns—like, "Why don't astronomers ever play hide and seek? Because good luck hiding when you're always being observed!" But we recognize the gravity of our study and the unexpected implications it may hold.
As we embark on this cosmic journey of discovery, it's worth considering the narrative potential inherent in the confluence of the otherworldly and the terrestrial. The drama of a celestial ballet influencing the course of a football contest may seem too extraordinary to believe, like a quarterback attempting a Hail Mary pass from Saturn. However, if our findings reveal a tangible link, it would mean that the stars themselves have a stake in the outcome of our earthly games. It brings to mind the classic dad joke: "Why did the football coach go to outer space? To improve his team's astro-nomical performance!"
In the following sections, we present our methodology, findings, and implications, shedding light on the surprising correlation between distant planets and the realm of athletic competition. After all, science has always been about pushing boundaries, challenging assumptions, and, most importantly, finding the humor in the unexpected. Let's boldly go where football statisticians have never gone before!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The curious relationship between the distance separating Jupiter and Venus and the outcome of the Super Bowl has intrigued researchers for years. In "Astrophysical Journal," Smith and colleagues investigated the potential impact of planetary positions on earthly events, prompting further inquiry into the interplay between celestial phenomena and human activities. Similarly, Doe and Jones, in "Astronomy and Astrophysics," delved into the astrological patterns that might influence sporting events, raising questions about the cosmic forces at play in the realm of athletics.

Turning to non-fiction literature, "The Planets" by Dava Sobel offers a comprehensive exploration of the celestial bodies within our solar system, providing insights into the gravitational interactions and orbital dynamics that govern planetary alignments. Likewise, "Cosmos" by Carl Sagan delves into the profound influence of the cosmos on human perception and culture, offering a thought-provoking perspective on the potential connections between celestial events and earthly affairs.

In the realm of fiction, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams presents a whimsical narrative of space exploration and cosmic absurdity, reminding readers that the universe is full of surprises and unexpected connections. Additionally, "Good Omens" by Neil Gaiman and Terry Pratchett weaves a tale of celestial prophecies and otherworldly interventions, blurring the boundaries between the mundane and the cosmic in a comically captivating manner.

Drawing inspiration from the world of board games, the celestial-themed strategy game "Twilight Struggle" incorporates geopolitical tensions and global influence, reflecting the intricate dance of powers on the world stage—a concept that resonates with the celestial influence on earthly events in our study. Furthermore, the celestial navigation in the game "Ticket to Ride: Rails & Sails" highlights the significance of spatial relationships and strategic positioning, mirroring the complexity of planetary alignments and their potential impact on human endeavors.

With the celestial and terrestrial realms colliding in unexpected ways, our literature review has revealed a trove of diverse perspectives and narratives that encapsulate the mysterious interplay between the cosmos and human activities. As we delve deeper into this cosmic odyssey, our findings may just illuminate the celestial influences lurking behind the touchdowns and interceptions of the Super Bowl, leaving us to wonder: "Why did the astronaut bring a football with him to space? He wanted to have a celestial 'ball' game!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Jupiter and Venus and Points Scored by the losing team in the Super Bowl. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Caclculated using Astropy and Wikipedia . You used data from 1975 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Looking to the Stars: The Celestial Anomaly of Jupiter, Venus, and Super Bowl Defeat

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the peculiar relationship between the distance separating Jupiter and Venus as observed in the night sky and the total points scored by the losing team in the Super Bowl. The inspiration for this research stemmed from a lighthearted conversation among colleagues, where someone jokingly questioned if the gravitational pull of outer planets could potentially influence the outcome of a football game (or vice versa). To our surprise, our analysis utilizing data from Astropy and Wikipedia revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.3383857 and p < 0.05 for the years spanning from 1975 to 2022. Remarkably, this celestial anomaly seems to have a slight but statistically significant connection to the performance of the losing team in the Super Bowl.

This unexpected discovery serves as a reminder that sometimes, the universe's influence can extend far beyond the reach of our comprehension. It also conjures up a cheesy dad joke: "Why did the losing quarterback spend so much time staring at the stars? He was trying to find a celestial explanation for his team's defeat!" The findings of this study may prompt further investigation into the mysterious interplay between astronomical phenomena and earthly events, leaving us pondering whether the "eyes in the sky" are secretly influencing athletic outcomes.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
The realm of scientific inquiry often leads us into uncharted territories, where the boundaries of plausibility are tested and unexpected connections can emerge. It is in this spirit of open-minded exploration that we delved into the curious convergence of celestial bodies and athletic competition. As the old adage goes, "When the moon hits your eye like a big pizza pie, that's amore"—or in our case, that's science! Similarly, we pondered, can the celestial dance between Jupiter and Venus have an impact on the gridiron battleground of the Super Bowl? It sounds like a punchline to a cosmic joke, but our investigation has unveiled some intriguing insights.
In the world of statistical analysis, researchers often seek to uncover correlations between seemingly disparate variables. From the heights of the Himalayas to the depths of the Mariana Trench, from the subatomic particle to the expanding universe, every facet of existence can potentially be linked through the lens of statistical inquiry. It's a mystery, wrapped in a p-value, inside an enigma! So, with the methodology of astrophysical observation and the rigor of statistical analysis at our disposal, we embarked on a quest to unearth the potential connection between the distance separating Jupiter and Venus and the fate of the losing team in the biggest event in American football.
Without a doubt, the harmonious alignment of celestial bodies has captured the imagination of humanity for eons. From the theorems of ancient astronomers to the spacefaring aspirations of modern civilization, the allure of the stars remains undiminished. We're inclined to say that the strong pull of gravitational forces might even rival the allure of bad puns—like, "Why don't astronomers ever play hide and seek? Because good luck hiding when you're always being observed!" But we recognize the gravity of our study and the unexpected implications it may hold.
As we embark on this cosmic journey of discovery, it's worth considering the narrative potential inherent in the confluence of the otherworldly and the terrestrial. The drama of a celestial ballet influencing the course of a football contest may seem too extraordinary to believe, like a quarterback attempting a Hail Mary pass from Saturn. However, if our findings reveal a tangible link, it would mean that the stars themselves have a stake in the outcome of our earthly games. It brings to mind the classic dad joke: "Why did the football coach go to outer space? To improve his team's astro-nomical performance!"
In the following sections, we present our methodology, findings, and implications, shedding light on the surprising correlation between distant planets and the realm of athletic competition. After all, science has always been about pushing boundaries, challenging assumptions, and, most importantly, finding the humor in the unexpected. Let's boldly go where football statisticians have never gone before!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To explore the potential relationship between the distance separating Jupiter and Venus and the performance of the losing team in the Super Bowl, we employed a combination of astrological and statistical methods. Our research team pored over a plethora of celestial data from Astropy and consulted the annals of Super Bowl statistics from various reliable sources. We then engaged in a series of whimsical rituals, including wearing football helmets adorned with tiny telescopes and conducting statistical analyses under the (metaphorical) watchful eyes of the planets. As Dad always says, "When doing research, it's important to keep an open mind and always carry a telescope, just in case any celestial correlations come into view!"

First, we computed the average distance between Jupiter and Venus during the timeframe of each Super Bowl, taking into account the precise positions of these celestial bodies. The painstaking task of aligning our data with the galactic coordinates was akin to a space-faring game of "connect the dots." It was as if the planets were winking at us, as if to say, "We hold the keys to football fate… or so it seems!"

Next, we meticulously compiled the total points scored by the losing team in each Super Bowl game, carefully noting the thrilling victories and heartbreaking defeats that unfolded under the spectacle of stadium lights. It was a bit like tracking the cosmic collisions of rogue asteroids – except in this case, the asteroids were footballs, and the galactic collisions were touchdowns (or lack thereof).

With our celestial and gridiron data in hand, we then enlisted the assistance of statistical software to calculate the correlation coefficient and assess the significance of any observed relationship. This process involved navigating through a cosmic tangle of data points, where the spirit of statistical significance shimmered like a distant quasar, beckoning us to unlock its secrets. As our analysis unfolded, whispers of statistical significance seemed to emanate from the depths of space itself, as if the stars were conspiring to reveal their cosmic connection to the losing teams. It was like playing a game of heavenly Sudoku, with the planets and statistical variables aligning in unexpected, tantalizing patterns.

Furthermore, we conducted a series of robustness checks, ensuring that our findings remained steadfast in the face of potential confounding variables and cosmic interferences. We applied various testing methods to verify the consistency of our results, akin to the relentless pursuit of a cosmic truth that refuses to be obscured by the nebulous clouds of uncertainty. In the end, our statistical analyses stood tall and unyielding, much like a celestial body resilient against the gravitational forces of skepticism.

Lastly, we incorporated various control measures, accounting for earthly sporting dynamics and astral interplay, to tease out the genuine astronomical influence on Super Bowl outcomes. The task was reminiscent of balancing cosmic scales, attempting to discern whether the celestial forces held sway over the outcome of earthly conquests. Our methodology was as precise as an astronaut's aim, honed on the stars above and the pigskins below.

In summary, our methodology involved a harmonious blend of astrological awareness and statistical scrutiny, infused with the humor and curiosity befitting of such an eccentric inquiry. Like a quarterback eyeing the stars for a passing route, we navigated the cosmos and the gridiron with equal doses of determination and wonder, discovering unexpected correlations that intertwine the celestial and the terrestrial. For, in the grand cosmic dance of existence, even the most improbable connections can hold kernels of truth, awaiting intrepid investigators to reveal their esoteric secrets.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Jupiter and Venus and Points Scored by the losing team in the Super Bowl. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Caclculated using Astropy and Wikipedia .

For the time period 1975 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.3383857, r-squared of 0.1145049, and p < 0.05.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Looking to the Stars: The Celestial Anomaly of Jupiter, Venus, and Super Bowl Defeat

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the peculiar relationship between the distance separating Jupiter and Venus as observed in the night sky and the total points scored by the losing team in the Super Bowl. The inspiration for this research stemmed from a lighthearted conversation among colleagues, where someone jokingly questioned if the gravitational pull of outer planets could potentially influence the outcome of a football game (or vice versa). To our surprise, our analysis utilizing data from Astropy and Wikipedia revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.3383857 and p < 0.05 for the years spanning from 1975 to 2022. Remarkably, this celestial anomaly seems to have a slight but statistically significant connection to the performance of the losing team in the Super Bowl.

This unexpected discovery serves as a reminder that sometimes, the universe's influence can extend far beyond the reach of our comprehension. It also conjures up a cheesy dad joke: "Why did the losing quarterback spend so much time staring at the stars? He was trying to find a celestial explanation for his team's defeat!" The findings of this study may prompt further investigation into the mysterious interplay between astronomical phenomena and earthly events, leaving us pondering whether the "eyes in the sky" are secretly influencing athletic outcomes.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Introduction
The realm of scientific inquiry often leads us into uncharted territories, where the boundaries of plausibility are tested and unexpected connections can emerge. It is in this spirit of open-minded exploration that we delved into the curious convergence of celestial bodies and athletic competition. As the old adage goes, "When the moon hits your eye like a big pizza pie, that's amore"—or in our case, that's science! Similarly, we pondered, can the celestial dance between Jupiter and Venus have an impact on the gridiron battleground of the Super Bowl? It sounds like a punchline to a cosmic joke, but our investigation has unveiled some intriguing insights.
In the world of statistical analysis, researchers often seek to uncover correlations between seemingly disparate variables. From the heights of the Himalayas to the depths of the Mariana Trench, from the subatomic particle to the expanding universe, every facet of existence can potentially be linked through the lens of statistical inquiry. It's a mystery, wrapped in a p-value, inside an enigma! So, with the methodology of astrophysical observation and the rigor of statistical analysis at our disposal, we embarked on a quest to unearth the potential connection between the distance separating Jupiter and Venus and the fate of the losing team in the biggest event in American football.
Without a doubt, the harmonious alignment of celestial bodies has captured the imagination of humanity for eons. From the theorems of ancient astronomers to the spacefaring aspirations of modern civilization, the allure of the stars remains undiminished. We're inclined to say that the strong pull of gravitational forces might even rival the allure of bad puns—like, "Why don't astronomers ever play hide and seek? Because good luck hiding when you're always being observed!" But we recognize the gravity of our study and the unexpected implications it may hold.
As we embark on this cosmic journey of discovery, it's worth considering the narrative potential inherent in the confluence of the otherworldly and the terrestrial. The drama of a celestial ballet influencing the course of a football contest may seem too extraordinary to believe, like a quarterback attempting a Hail Mary pass from Saturn. However, if our findings reveal a tangible link, it would mean that the stars themselves have a stake in the outcome of our earthly games. It brings to mind the classic dad joke: "Why did the football coach go to outer space? To improve his team's astro-nomical performance!"
In the following sections, we present our methodology, findings, and implications, shedding light on the surprising correlation between distant planets and the realm of athletic competition. After all, science has always been about pushing boundaries, challenging assumptions, and, most importantly, finding the humor in the unexpected. Let's boldly go where football statisticians have never gone before!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The empirical analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation (r = 0.3383857, r-squared = 0.1145049, p < 0.05) between the distance separating Jupiter and Venus in the night sky and the points scored by the losing team in the Super Bowl over the period from 1975 to 2022. This unexpected connection may prompt a cosmic rethink of the factors influencing athletic outcomes, leaving us with a celestial puzzle that could make even the most seasoned astrophysicist scratch their head. It's almost as mind-blowing as the thought of what astronauts use to stay in touch with their relatives: "Spacebook"!

The scatterplot depicted in Fig. 1 visually encapsulates the statistical relationship we uncovered between the celestial bodies and the gridiron drama. It's a sight to behold, much like a shooting star in the night sky or a running back sprinting for the end zone. The plot not only demonstrates the positive correlation between the variables but also hints at the cosmic dance underlying this peculiar phenomenon. It's a bit like a galactic game of catch—except the players are gas giants and the ball is, well, statistical significance.

Our findings introduce an added layer of intrigue to the age-old debate of cosmic determinism versus human agency. Could it be that the gravitational interplay of Jupiter and Venus exerts a subtle influence on the fortunes of football teams, guiding the trajectory of the pigskin and the fate of touchdowns? It's a question that reverberates through the annals of both astrophysics and sports fandom, reminding us that the universe is vast, mysterious, and occasionally whimsical in its machinations. A lot like trying to explain to aliens why Earth has "super" bowls but no "hyper" utensils!

In conclusion, the unexpected correlation we unearthed tantalizes the scientific imagination and underscores the immeasurable depths of the cosmos. It's a reminder that even in the realm of empirical analysis, humor and curiosity can synergize to produce unexpected revelations. After all, who knew that the zoologist and the astronomer often tell similar jokes? They both aim for the most universal laughter! This study paves the way for further exploration into the enigmatic relationship between celestial occurrences and terrestrial events, inviting researchers to gaze skyward with renewed intrigue and perhaps a touch of cosmic whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Jupiter and Venus and Points Scored by the losing team in the Super Bowl. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Looking to the Stars: The Celestial Anomaly of Jupiter, Venus, and Super Bowl Defeat

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the peculiar relationship between the distance separating Jupiter and Venus as observed in the night sky and the total points scored by the losing team in the Super Bowl. The inspiration for this research stemmed from a lighthearted conversation among colleagues, where someone jokingly questioned if the gravitational pull of outer planets could potentially influence the outcome of a football game (or vice versa). To our surprise, our analysis utilizing data from Astropy and Wikipedia revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.3383857 and p < 0.05 for the years spanning from 1975 to 2022. Remarkably, this celestial anomaly seems to have a slight but statistically significant connection to the performance of the losing team in the Super Bowl.

This unexpected discovery serves as a reminder that sometimes, the universe's influence can extend far beyond the reach of our comprehension. It also conjures up a cheesy dad joke: "Why did the losing quarterback spend so much time staring at the stars? He was trying to find a celestial explanation for his team's defeat!" The findings of this study may prompt further investigation into the mysterious interplay between astronomical phenomena and earthly events, leaving us pondering whether the "eyes in the sky" are secretly influencing athletic outcomes.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The curious relationship between the distance separating Jupiter and Venus and the outcome of the Super Bowl has intrigued researchers for years. In "Astrophysical Journal," Smith and colleagues investigated the potential impact of planetary positions on earthly events, prompting further inquiry into the interplay between celestial phenomena and human activities. Similarly, Doe and Jones, in "Astronomy and Astrophysics," delved into the astrological patterns that might influence sporting events, raising questions about the cosmic forces at play in the realm of athletics.
Turning to non-fiction literature, "The Planets" by Dava Sobel offers a comprehensive exploration of the celestial bodies within our solar system, providing insights into the gravitational interactions and orbital dynamics that govern planetary alignments. Likewise, "Cosmos" by Carl Sagan delves into the profound influence of the cosmos on human perception and culture, offering a thought-provoking perspective on the potential connections between celestial events and earthly affairs.
In the realm of fiction, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams presents a whimsical narrative of space exploration and cosmic absurdity, reminding readers that the universe is full of surprises and unexpected connections. Additionally, "Good Omens" by Neil Gaiman and Terry Pratchett weaves a tale of celestial prophecies and otherworldly interventions, blurring the boundaries between the mundane and the cosmic in a comically captivating manner.
Drawing inspiration from the world of board games, the celestial-themed strategy game "Twilight Struggle" incorporates geopolitical tensions and global influence, reflecting the intricate dance of powers on the world stage—a concept that resonates with the celestial influence on earthly events in our study. Furthermore, the celestial navigation in the game "Ticket to Ride: Rails & Sails" highlights the significance of spatial relationships and strategic positioning, mirroring the complexity of planetary alignments and their potential impact on human endeavors.
With the celestial and terrestrial realms colliding in unexpected ways, our literature review has revealed a trove of diverse perspectives and narratives that encapsulate the mysterious interplay between the cosmos and human activities. As we delve deeper into this cosmic odyssey, our findings may just illuminate the celestial influences lurking behind the touchdowns and interceptions of the Super Bowl, leaving us to wonder: "Why did the astronaut bring a football with him to space? He wanted to have a celestial 'ball' game!"

[[RESULTS]]
The empirical analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation (r = 0.3383857, r-squared = 0.1145049, p < 0.05) between the distance separating Jupiter and Venus in the night sky and the points scored by the losing team in the Super Bowl over the period from 1975 to 2022. This unexpected connection may prompt a cosmic rethink of the factors influencing athletic outcomes, leaving us with a celestial puzzle that could make even the most seasoned astrophysicist scratch their head. It's almost as mind-blowing as the thought of what astronauts use to stay in touch with their relatives: "Spacebook"!
The scatterplot depicted in Fig. 1 visually encapsulates the statistical relationship we uncovered between the celestial bodies and the gridiron drama. It's a sight to behold, much like a shooting star in the night sky or a running back sprinting for the end zone. The plot not only demonstrates the positive correlation between the variables but also hints at the cosmic dance underlying this peculiar phenomenon. It's a bit like a galactic game of catch—except the players are gas giants and the ball is, well, statistical significance.
Our findings introduce an added layer of intrigue to the age-old debate of cosmic determinism versus human agency. Could it be that the gravitational interplay of Jupiter and Venus exerts a subtle influence on the fortunes of football teams, guiding the trajectory of the pigskin and the fate of touchdowns? It's a question that reverberates through the annals of both astrophysics and sports fandom, reminding us that the universe is vast, mysterious, and occasionally whimsical in its machinations. A lot like trying to explain to aliens why Earth has "super" bowls but no "hyper" utensils!
In conclusion, the unexpected correlation we unearthed tantalizes the scientific imagination and underscores the immeasurable depths of the cosmos. It's a reminder that even in the realm of empirical analysis, humor and curiosity can synergize to produce unexpected revelations. After all, who knew that the zoologist and the astronomer often tell similar jokes? They both aim for the most universal laughter! This study paves the way for further exploration into the enigmatic relationship between celestial occurrences and terrestrial events, inviting researchers to gaze skyward with renewed intrigue and perhaps a touch of cosmic whimsy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study indeed shed light on the unexpected correlation between the distance separating Jupiter and Venus and the performance of the losing team in the Super Bowl. Much like a solar eclipse, this correlation adds a dash of cosmic flair to the football field, prompting us to ponder the mysterious influence of celestial bodies on earthly events. It's like the universe is saying, "I've got 99 problems, but a statistician ain't one!"

Our results bolster the prior research by Smith and colleagues, who first posited the idea of planetary positions impacting terrestrial happenings. Just as a comet streaks across the night sky, our analysis streaked past expectations, revealing a statistically significant link between the position of outer planets and the outcome of a sporting event. This correlation is as surprising as a surprise two-point conversion, leaving us with an unexpected celestial touchdown.

Drawing parallels from the literary world, the cosmic connections we uncovered resonate with the whimsical narrative in "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy." In the same way that Arthur Dent navigates the cosmos with bemused wonder, we navigate the statistical landscape with a sense of cosmic curiosity. It's as if the universe is playing a game of "cosmic catch" with statistics, challenging our preconceived notions and cosmic coincidences.

Furthermore, our findings harken back to the celestial-themed strategy game "Twilight Struggle," where global influence mirrors the intricate dance of powers on the world stage. In our research, it seems that the dance of celestial bodies may also have a hand in shaping earthly outcomes, akin to a cosmic quarterback orchestrating a last-minute drive.

The positive correlation we uncovered not only adds a touch of celestial whimsy to the sporting arena but also invites further exploration into the intricate interplay between astronomical phenomena and earthly events. It's like trying to explain gravitational forces to someone unfamiliar with science: a universal challenge with a cosmic punchline.

In light of these revelations, we encourage fellow researchers to join us in peering through the cosmic looking glass, embracing the unexpected connections that may emerge between the astronomical and the everyday. After all, the universe's sense of humor may just be its most universal language. And maybe, just maybe, the proverbial stars are aligning for an astrologically-inclined Super Bowl victory!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The distance between Jupiter and Venus and Points Scored by the losing team in the Super Bowl. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Looking to the Stars: The Celestial Anomaly of Jupiter, Venus, and Super Bowl Defeat

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the peculiar relationship between the distance separating Jupiter and Venus as observed in the night sky and the total points scored by the losing team in the Super Bowl. The inspiration for this research stemmed from a lighthearted conversation among colleagues, where someone jokingly questioned if the gravitational pull of outer planets could potentially influence the outcome of a football game (or vice versa). To our surprise, our analysis utilizing data from Astropy and Wikipedia revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.3383857 and p < 0.05 for the years spanning from 1975 to 2022. Remarkably, this celestial anomaly seems to have a slight but statistically significant connection to the performance of the losing team in the Super Bowl.

This unexpected discovery serves as a reminder that sometimes, the universe's influence can extend far beyond the reach of our comprehension. It also conjures up a cheesy dad joke: "Why did the losing quarterback spend so much time staring at the stars? He was trying to find a celestial explanation for his team's defeat!" The findings of this study may prompt further investigation into the mysterious interplay between astronomical phenomena and earthly events, leaving us pondering whether the "eyes in the sky" are secretly influencing athletic outcomes.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Introduction
The realm of scientific inquiry often leads us into uncharted territories, where the boundaries of plausibility are tested and unexpected connections can emerge. It is in this spirit of open-minded exploration that we delved into the curious convergence of celestial bodies and athletic competition. As the old adage goes, "When the moon hits your eye like a big pizza pie, that's amore"—or in our case, that's science! Similarly, we pondered, can the celestial dance between Jupiter and Venus have an impact on the gridiron battleground of the Super Bowl? It sounds like a punchline to a cosmic joke, but our investigation has unveiled some intriguing insights.
In the world of statistical analysis, researchers often seek to uncover correlations between seemingly disparate variables. From the heights of the Himalayas to the depths of the Mariana Trench, from the subatomic particle to the expanding universe, every facet of existence can potentially be linked through the lens of statistical inquiry. It's a mystery, wrapped in a p-value, inside an enigma! So, with the methodology of astrophysical observation and the rigor of statistical analysis at our disposal, we embarked on a quest to unearth the potential connection between the distance separating Jupiter and Venus and the fate of the losing team in the biggest event in American football.
Without a doubt, the harmonious alignment of celestial bodies has captured the imagination of humanity for eons. From the theorems of ancient astronomers to the spacefaring aspirations of modern civilization, the allure of the stars remains undiminished. We're inclined to say that the strong pull of gravitational forces might even rival the allure of bad puns—like, "Why don't astronomers ever play hide and seek? Because good luck hiding when you're always being observed!" But we recognize the gravity of our study and the unexpected implications it may hold.
As we embark on this cosmic journey of discovery, it's worth considering the narrative potential inherent in the confluence of the otherworldly and the terrestrial. The drama of a celestial ballet influencing the course of a football contest may seem too extraordinary to believe, like a quarterback attempting a Hail Mary pass from Saturn. However, if our findings reveal a tangible link, it would mean that the stars themselves have a stake in the outcome of our earthly games. It brings to mind the classic dad joke: "Why did the football coach go to outer space? To improve his team's astro-nomical performance!"
In the following sections, we present our methodology, findings, and implications, shedding light on the surprising correlation between distant planets and the realm of athletic competition. After all, science has always been about pushing boundaries, challenging assumptions, and, most importantly, finding the humor in the unexpected. Let's boldly go where football statisticians have never gone before!

[[RESULTS]]
The empirical analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation (r = 0.3383857, r-squared = 0.1145049, p < 0.05) between the distance separating Jupiter and Venus in the night sky and the points scored by the losing team in the Super Bowl over the period from 1975 to 2022. This unexpected connection may prompt a cosmic rethink of the factors influencing athletic outcomes, leaving us with a celestial puzzle that could make even the most seasoned astrophysicist scratch their head. It's almost as mind-blowing as the thought of what astronauts use to stay in touch with their relatives: "Spacebook"!
The scatterplot depicted in Fig. 1 visually encapsulates the statistical relationship we uncovered between the celestial bodies and the gridiron drama. It's a sight to behold, much like a shooting star in the night sky or a running back sprinting for the end zone. The plot not only demonstrates the positive correlation between the variables but also hints at the cosmic dance underlying this peculiar phenomenon. It's a bit like a galactic game of catch—except the players are gas giants and the ball is, well, statistical significance.
Our findings introduce an added layer of intrigue to the age-old debate of cosmic determinism versus human agency. Could it be that the gravitational interplay of Jupiter and Venus exerts a subtle influence on the fortunes of football teams, guiding the trajectory of the pigskin and the fate of touchdowns? It's a question that reverberates through the annals of both astrophysics and sports fandom, reminding us that the universe is vast, mysterious, and occasionally whimsical in its machinations. A lot like trying to explain to aliens why Earth has "super" bowls but no "hyper" utensils!
In conclusion, the unexpected correlation we unearthed tantalizes the scientific imagination and underscores the immeasurable depths of the cosmos. It's a reminder that even in the realm of empirical analysis, humor and curiosity can synergize to produce unexpected revelations. After all, who knew that the zoologist and the astronomer often tell similar jokes? They both aim for the most universal laughter! This study paves the way for further exploration into the enigmatic relationship between celestial occurrences and terrestrial events, inviting researchers to gaze skyward with renewed intrigue and perhaps a touch of cosmic whimsy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has shed light on the surprising link between the distance separating Jupiter and Venus and the points scored by the losing team in the Super Bowl, providing evidence that the celestial bodies may exert a cosmic influence on gridiron outcomes. It's as if the quarterbacks are secretly taking advice from the stars – talk about a "hail planetary" pass! Through our statistical analysis, we have uncovered a correlation that may very well expand our understanding of the interconnectedness between the universe and human competitions.

Our findings offer a celestial twist to the often-mundane world of sports statistics, reminding us that even the most unlikely variables can bear some cosmic weight. It's like discovering that the football field is not just a battleground for athletes, but also a stage for the subtle dance of the planets. One might say that the losing team's fate is literally written in the stars – or at least in our regression models! This study has opened a celestial floodgate of curiosity and potential for further investigation into the profound implications of interstellar influence on earthly events.

As we reflect on the findings, one cannot help but appreciate the serendipitous harmony of the cosmos and the peculiar allure of the statistical outliers. It's a bit like finding a shooting star in a data set – unexpected, yet undeniably enchanting. The statistical relationship we have uncovered is a testament to the intricate tapestry of the universe, where even the most mundane occurrences may bear the faint imprint of the celestial ballet. It's a bit like discovering a constellation in an unexpected place – a delightful surprise that prompts a cosmic rethink of the everyday.

In light of these revelatory findings, we assert that further research in this area is... well, astronomical! Our study has brought to the forefront a captivating cosmic conundrum that beckons for continued exploration. However, we must resist the pull of endless astronomical and statistical rabbit holes and acknowledge that perhaps the stars have aligned just enough for us to bask in the glow of this celestial revelation. After all, who needs more research when the heavens have already granted us a statistical starburst?

In the words of astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson, "The universe is under no obligation to make sense to you." But in the realm of statistical anomalies, sometimes the universe just can't resist throwing us a cosmic curveball!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Looking to the Stars: The Celestial Anomaly of Jupiter, Venus, and Super Bowl Defeat. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Astrological Journal of Interplanetary Anomalies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Looking to the Stars: The Celestial Anomaly of Jupiter, Venus, and Super Bowl Defeat. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Planetary Phenomena Research and Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Looking to the Stars: The Celestial Anomaly of Jupiter, Venus, and Super Bowl Defeat with an abstract of In this study, we investigate the peculiar relationship between the distance separating Jupiter and Venus as observed in the night sky and the total points scored by the losing team in the Super Bowl. The inspiration for this research stemmed from a lighthearted conversation among colleagues, where someone jokingly questioned if the gravitational pull of outer planets could potentially influence the outcome of a football game (or vice versa). To our surprise, our analysis utilizing data from Astropy and Wikipedia revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.3383857 and p < 0.05 for the years spanning from 1975 to 2022. Remarkably, this celestial anomaly seems to have a slight but statistically significant connection to the performance of the losing team in the Super Bowl.
This unexpected discovery serves as a reminder that sometimes, the universe's influence can extend far beyond the reach of our comprehension. It also conjures up a cheesy dad joke: "Why did the losing quarterback spend so much time staring at the stars? He was trying to find a celestial explanation for his team's defeat!" The findings of this study may prompt further investigation into the mysterious interplay between astronomical phenomena and earthly events, leaving us pondering whether the "eyes in the sky" are secretly influencing athletic outcomes.

ChatGPT:

Jupiter, Venus, Super Bowl defeat, celestial anomaly, correlation coefficient, Astropy, Wikipedia, losing team, football game outcome, outer planets, gravitational pull, data analysis, astronomical phenomena, athletic outcomes, interplay, celestial influence, universe, Super Bowl performance

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The distance between Jupiter and Venus
Detailed data title: The average distance between Jupiter and Venus as measured on the first day of each month
Source: Caclculated using Astropy
Additional Info: I wrote a Python script using Astropy to calculate the distance between the named planets on the first day of each month for every year.

See what else correlates with The distance between Jupiter and Venus

Points Scored by the losing team in the Super Bowl
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Points Scored by the losing team in the Super Bowl

Correlation r = 0.3383857 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.1145049 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 11.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Points Scored by the losing team in the Super Bowl) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The distance between Jupiter and Venus) over the 48 years from 1975 through 2022.

p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.019. 0.0186490288891850780000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.34 in 1.9% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 54 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 47 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 47 because we have two variables measured over a period of 48 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.06, 0.57 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
197519761977197819791980198119821983198419851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
The distance between Jupiter and Venus (Planetary distance (AU))4.844995.121185.0165.281755.340645.408875.556395.336915.507735.09515.273084.867435.116424.898925.204545.18465.381565.478625.403715.555285.216615.379194.943615.157864.836965.145185.035245.325525.360725.435975.550215.326025.470465.05585.235554.840645.122134.913265.251915.216115.425455.488175.409545.526635.183825.333514.907155.14356
Points Scored by the losing team in the Super Bowl (Points scored)617141031191021179161020101610192417132617212419167172129211017142317251731824102833320920




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4.84499,5.12118,5.016,5.28175,5.34064,5.40887,5.55639,5.33691,5.50773,5.0951,5.27308,4.86743,5.11642,4.89892,5.20454,5.1846,5.38156,5.47862,5.40371,5.55528,5.21661,5.37919,4.94361,5.15786,4.83696,5.14518,5.03524,5.32552,5.36072,5.43597,5.55021,5.32602,5.47046,5.0558,5.23555,4.84064,5.12213,4.91326,5.25191,5.21611,5.42545,5.48817,5.40954,5.52663,5.18382,5.33351,4.90715,5.14356,])
array_2 = np.array([6,17,14,10,31,19,10,21,17,9,16,10,20,10,16,10,19,24,17,13,26,17,21,24,19,16,7,17,21,29,21,10,17,14,23,17,25,17,31,8,24,10,28,33,3,20,9,20,])
array_1_name = "The distance between Jupiter and Venus"
array_2_name = "Points Scored by the losing team in the Super Bowl"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!


Correlation ID: 2589 · Black Variable ID: 1968 · Red Variable ID: 540
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0