Report an error
GMO use in cotton in Georgia correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of file clerks in Georgia | r=0.93 | 20yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'matt parker' | r=0.92 | 19yrs | Yes! |
Kerosene used in South Korea | r=0.91 | 23yrs | No |
Google searches for 'E.T. phone home' | r=0.91 | 19yrs | Yes! |
Automotive recalls for issues with Vehicle Speed Control | r=0.88 | 23yrs | Yes! |
Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series | r=0.48 | 14yrs | No |
GMO use in cotton in Georgia also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)