about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,884 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in cotton in Georgia and the second variable is Automotive recalls for issues with Vehicle Speed Control.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

As the demand for non-GMO cotton in Georgia increased, farmers had to resort to old-fashioned manual labor, leading to a surplus of highly skilled workers. Some of these workers, with nimble fingers honed from picking cotton, found jobs in the automotive industry. Their dexterity and precision in assembling vehicles inadvertently led to fewer defects in the vehicle speed control system. It's a case of nature-friendly farming cultivating a new breed of speed control experts!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Image Generation Prompt: Generate an image that showcases a futuristic cybernetic scene set in a sprawling Georgia cotton field. In the foreground, a high-tech tractor with advanced GMO cotton seed technology is being replaced by a traditional, non-GMO seed planter. As the tractor moves through the field, the cotton plants grow taller and healthier without interference-causing fibers. In the background, depict a line of cars at an automotive factory smoothly moving off the production line, with their speed control systems functioning flawlessly. Contrast this seamless process with the previous recalls due to speed control issues. Emphasize the fusion of nature and technology through a cybernetic art style, while keeping the visual depiction sleek and immersive. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in cotton in Georgia and Automotive recalls for issues with Vehicle Speed Control. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Oragami Cybernetic art Photorealism Whimsical illustration Oragami
ChatGPT: Cybernetic art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in cotton in Georgia and Automotive recalls for issues with Vehicle Speed Control, in the following situation: Because the decrease in GMO use in cotton led to a reduction in the production of cotton fibers that were inadvertently causing interference with vehicle speed control sensors. This decrease allowed for a smoother and more controlled operation of the vehicle speed control systems, thereby reducing the number of automotive recalls related to speed control issues.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a sprawling Georgia cotton field, a tractor equipped with the latest GMO cotton seed technology is being replaced by a traditional, non-GMO seed planter. As the tractor moves through the field, the cotton plants grow taller and healthier without the interference-causing fibers. In the background, a line of cars at an automotive factory is moving smoothly off the production line, their speed control systems functioning flawlessly. This seamless process is in stark contrast to the previous recalls due to speed control issues.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cybernetic art ] and depicting this scene: In a sprawling Georgia cotton field, a tractor equipped with the latest GMO cotton seed technology is being replaced by a traditional, non-GMO seed planter. As the tractor moves through the field, the cotton plants grow taller and healthier without the interference-causing fibers. In the background, a line of cars at an automotive factory is moving smoothly off the production line, their speed control systems functioning flawlessly. This seamless process is in stark contrast to the previous recalls due to speed control issues. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Image Generation Prompt: Generate an image that showcases a futuristic cybernetic scene set in a sprawling Georgia cotton field. In the foreground, a high-tech tractor with advanced GMO cotton seed technology is being replaced by a traditional, non-GMO seed planter. As the tractor moves through the field, the cotton plants grow taller and healthier without interference-causing fibers. In the background, depict a line of cars at an automotive factory smoothly moving off the production line, with their speed control systems functioning flawlessly. Contrast this seamless process with the previous recalls due to speed control issues. Emphasize the fusion of nature and technology through a cybernetic art style, while keeping the visual depiction sleek and immersive.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in GMO use in cotton in Georgia caused Automotive recalls for issues with Vehicle Speed Control to decrease. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Genetically Modified Cotton and Cruise Control: An Unlikely Pair

The Journal of Agricultural Genetics and Behavioral Engineering

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Georgia and Automotive recalls for issues with Vehicle Speed Control. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from USDA and US DOT to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8782491 and p < 0.01 for 2000 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Genetically Modified Cotton and Cruise Control: An Unlikely Pair"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper aims to investigate the unexpected correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in the state of Georgia and automotive recalls related to issues with vehicle speed control. It presents findings from an analysis of data collected from the USDA and US DOT, covering the years 2000 to 2022. Our research team uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8782491 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong association between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The implications of this surprising connection are both thought-provoking and, dare we say, "cotton-picking curious." We invite readers to delve into the details of our findings, which may just shift their gears on the intersection of agricultural biotechnology and automotive engineering.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Georgia and Automotive recalls for issues with Vehicle Speed Control. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Genetically Modified Cotton and Cruise Control: An Unlikely Pair"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper aims to investigate the unexpected correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in the state of Georgia and automotive recalls related to issues with vehicle speed control. It presents findings from an analysis of data collected from the USDA and US DOT, covering the years 2000 to 2022. Our research team uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8782491 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong association between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The implications of this surprising connection are both thought-provoking and, dare we say, "cotton-picking curious." We invite readers to delve into the details of our findings, which may just shift their gears on the intersection of agricultural biotechnology and automotive engineering.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

One might think that the world of genetically modified cotton and automotive technology exist in separate spheres, as different as night and day, or perhaps as varied as, well, cotton and cars. Yet, in the expansive landscape of agricultural biotechnology and mechanical engineering, sometimes the unexpected arises, much like a rogue weed amidst fields of neatly cultivated crops.

In this study, we delve into the curious case of genetically modified cotton in the cotton-rich state of Georgia and its peculiar connection to automotive recalls for issues with vehicle speed control. It's as if we stumbled upon a hidden thread, woven into the fabric of these two distinct domains, ultimately unraveled for all to inspect.

The research seeks to validate and make sense of this unlikely association, offering a statistically robust analysis of data collected from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Department of Transportation (DOT). Through a rigorous examination spanning the years 2000 to 2022, our findings reveal a surprising correlation, leaving us to ponder whether there's "more to this than meets the eye," much like a well-crafted cotton-picking pun.

As we proceed, we encourage readers to buckle up and embrace the unpredictable journey ahead as we unravel the mystery behind this seemingly inexplicable intersection of genetically modified cotton and cruise control. After all, in the world of academia, it's not every day that we stumble upon such an unconventional pairing, prompting us to question whether there truly is "something in the air," or perhaps, in the biological makeup of our cotton fields.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Georgia and Automotive recalls for issues with Vehicle Speed Control. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Genetically Modified Cotton and Cruise Control: An Unlikely Pair"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper aims to investigate the unexpected correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in the state of Georgia and automotive recalls related to issues with vehicle speed control. It presents findings from an analysis of data collected from the USDA and US DOT, covering the years 2000 to 2022. Our research team uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8782491 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong association between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The implications of this surprising connection are both thought-provoking and, dare we say, "cotton-picking curious." We invite readers to delve into the details of our findings, which may just shift their gears on the intersection of agricultural biotechnology and automotive engineering.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
One might think that the world of genetically modified cotton and automotive technology exist in separate spheres, as different as night and day, or perhaps as varied as, well, cotton and cars. Yet, in the expansive landscape of agricultural biotechnology and mechanical engineering, sometimes the unexpected arises, much like a rogue weed amidst fields of neatly cultivated crops.
In this study, we delve into the curious case of genetically modified cotton in the cotton-rich state of Georgia and its peculiar connection to automotive recalls for issues with vehicle speed control. It's as if we stumbled upon a hidden thread, woven into the fabric of these two distinct domains, ultimately unraveled for all to inspect.
The research seeks to validate and make sense of this unlikely association, offering a statistically robust analysis of data collected from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Department of Transportation (DOT). Through a rigorous examination spanning the years 2000 to 2022, our findings reveal a surprising correlation, leaving us to ponder whether there's "more to this than meets the eye," much like a well-crafted cotton-picking pun.
As we proceed, we encourage readers to buckle up and embrace the unpredictable journey ahead as we unravel the mystery behind this seemingly inexplicable intersection of genetically modified cotton and cruise control. After all, in the world of academia, it's not every day that we stumble upon such an unconventional pairing, prompting us to question whether there truly is "something in the air," or perhaps, in the biological makeup of our cotton fields.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The unexpected link between genetically modified cotton in Georgia and automotive recalls for issues with vehicle speed control has left many researchers scratching their heads, much like a perplexing case of sudden crop failure or a mysterious engine malfunction. The literature on this intersection of agricultural biotechnology and automotive engineering is as sparse as a cotton field in winter, but a few studies have touched upon related topics.

Smith and Doe (2010) examined the impact of GMO cotton adoption on agricultural practices and found significant increases in yield and pest resistance. Meanwhile, Jones (2015) explored the complexities of vehicle speed control systems and their susceptibility to malfunctions, revealing a multitude of factors at play in the engineering and regulation of automotive technology. These studies offer valuable insights into the individual components of our curious correlation, but they don't quite bridge the gap between cotton and cruise control.

Turning to non-fiction books, "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan provides a comprehensive exploration of the modern food industry, including the role of genetically modified crops in agriculture. Similarly, "Faster: The Acceleration of Just About Everything" by James Gleick delves into the culture and technology of speed, though it focuses on the societal implications rather than the mechanics of automotive recalls.

Fiction also offers its share of tangentially related works. In "Cotton Malone" novels by Steve Berry, the protagonist's adventures may not directly involve GM cotton, but they do take readers on thrilling journeys that, not unlike our research, unravel unexpected mysteries. On the automotive side, the classic "Christine" by Stephen King presents a chilling tale of a possessed car, reminding us that the world of vehicles can be as enigmatic as a genetically modified crop.

In a somewhat unconventional research approach, our team also ventured into the realm of children's cartoons and stumbled upon "Cars," an animated film that anthropomorphizes automobiles. While Lightning McQueen and Mater may not provide scientific insights, their antics did offer a momentary distraction from the complexities of our investigation.

As we wade through this eclectic mix of literature and culture, we remain committed to unraveling the enigma of genetically modified cotton and cruise control. After all, as much as we appreciate a good pun, we're eager to bring clarity to this unexpected pairing, even if it means digging through literature as deeply as a root in a cotton field.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Georgia and Automotive recalls for issues with Vehicle Speed Control. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and US DOT . You used data from 2000 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Genetically Modified Cotton and Cruise Control: An Unlikely Pair"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper aims to investigate the unexpected correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in the state of Georgia and automotive recalls related to issues with vehicle speed control. It presents findings from an analysis of data collected from the USDA and US DOT, covering the years 2000 to 2022. Our research team uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8782491 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong association between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The implications of this surprising connection are both thought-provoking and, dare we say, "cotton-picking curious." We invite readers to delve into the details of our findings, which may just shift their gears on the intersection of agricultural biotechnology and automotive engineering.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
One might think that the world of genetically modified cotton and automotive technology exist in separate spheres, as different as night and day, or perhaps as varied as, well, cotton and cars. Yet, in the expansive landscape of agricultural biotechnology and mechanical engineering, sometimes the unexpected arises, much like a rogue weed amidst fields of neatly cultivated crops.
In this study, we delve into the curious case of genetically modified cotton in the cotton-rich state of Georgia and its peculiar connection to automotive recalls for issues with vehicle speed control. It's as if we stumbled upon a hidden thread, woven into the fabric of these two distinct domains, ultimately unraveled for all to inspect.
The research seeks to validate and make sense of this unlikely association, offering a statistically robust analysis of data collected from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Department of Transportation (DOT). Through a rigorous examination spanning the years 2000 to 2022, our findings reveal a surprising correlation, leaving us to ponder whether there's "more to this than meets the eye," much like a well-crafted cotton-picking pun.
As we proceed, we encourage readers to buckle up and embrace the unpredictable journey ahead as we unravel the mystery behind this seemingly inexplicable intersection of genetically modified cotton and cruise control. After all, in the world of academia, it's not every day that we stumble upon such an unconventional pairing, prompting us to question whether there truly is "something in the air," or perhaps, in the biological makeup of our cotton fields.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the intriguing entanglement between genetically modified cotton in Georgia and automotive recalls for vehicle speed control issues, our research team employed a multi-faceted approach that could rival the complexities of untangling a particularly knotty bale of cotton. We initially scoured the vast expanse of the internet, sifting through an abundance of data sources like intrepid treasure hunters seeking the elusive link between these seemingly incongruous phenomena. Our primary sources of data were the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Department of Transportation (DOT), known to us affectionately as the "bouquet" of this research endeavor.

Our investigation encompassed the years 2000 to 2022, a span of time that witnessed the evolution and proliferation of both genetically modified cotton and automotive technologies. We must note that our data collection process involved meticulous attention to detail and thorough scrutiny, much akin to inspecting the integrity of finely spun yarn. We scrutinized agricultural records, automotive manufacturing reports, cotton cultivation standards, and vehicle speed control specifications, aiming to capture the nuances and idiosyncrasies that might shed light on this unlikely association.

To analyze the wealth of data gathered, we employed statistical methods that could make even the most complicated calculus problem seem as simple as 1 + 1. Our statistical analysis included measures of correlation, effectively determining the strength and direction of the relationship between the prevalence of GMO cotton in Georgia and the occurrence of automotive recalls related to vehicle speed control. We calculated correlation coefficients that could be described as "positively electric," and p-values that begged the question, "is this for real?" This allowed us to discern whether there was a fiendish correlation lurking behind the scenes or a mere statistical fluke.

In addition, we utilized regression models that would make a car enthusiast's heart race, developing predictive equations to model the interaction between GMO cotton presence and automotive recalls. The interplay between these variables was as intricate as the internal workings of a high-performance engine, and our models aimed to capture this complexity with precision.

Furthermore, we delved into geographical analyses, examining the spatial distribution of GMO cotton cultivation in Georgia and its proximity to the epicenters of automotive recall clusters. This spatial approach revealed geographic patterns that raised the eyebrow of even the most seasoned cartographer, prompting us to ponder whether there was a "hidden GPS signal" guiding the convergence of these disparate elements.

Our methodological concoction, while certainly eclectic, was designed to navigate the rapids of uncertainty and reveal the underlying patterns that might illuminate the enigmatic connection between genetically modified cotton and automotive recalls for vehicle speed control issues. We proceeded with all the buoyancy of a well-crafted pun, hoping to carve a path through this tangled underbrush, ultimately emerging with a clearer understanding of this improbable, yet undeniably intriguing correlation. And now, with our methodologies laid bare, we invite readers to fasten their seat belts and prepare for the riveting voyage through the outlandish world of GMO cotton and automotive enigmas.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Georgia and Automotive recalls for issues with Vehicle Speed Control. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and US DOT .

For the time period 2000 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8782491, r-squared of 0.7713215, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Genetically Modified Cotton and Cruise Control: An Unlikely Pair"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper aims to investigate the unexpected correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in the state of Georgia and automotive recalls related to issues with vehicle speed control. It presents findings from an analysis of data collected from the USDA and US DOT, covering the years 2000 to 2022. Our research team uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8782491 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong association between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The implications of this surprising connection are both thought-provoking and, dare we say, "cotton-picking curious." We invite readers to delve into the details of our findings, which may just shift their gears on the intersection of agricultural biotechnology and automotive engineering.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
One might think that the world of genetically modified cotton and automotive technology exist in separate spheres, as different as night and day, or perhaps as varied as, well, cotton and cars. Yet, in the expansive landscape of agricultural biotechnology and mechanical engineering, sometimes the unexpected arises, much like a rogue weed amidst fields of neatly cultivated crops.
In this study, we delve into the curious case of genetically modified cotton in the cotton-rich state of Georgia and its peculiar connection to automotive recalls for issues with vehicle speed control. It's as if we stumbled upon a hidden thread, woven into the fabric of these two distinct domains, ultimately unraveled for all to inspect.
The research seeks to validate and make sense of this unlikely association, offering a statistically robust analysis of data collected from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Department of Transportation (DOT). Through a rigorous examination spanning the years 2000 to 2022, our findings reveal a surprising correlation, leaving us to ponder whether there's "more to this than meets the eye," much like a well-crafted cotton-picking pun.
As we proceed, we encourage readers to buckle up and embrace the unpredictable journey ahead as we unravel the mystery behind this seemingly inexplicable intersection of genetically modified cotton and cruise control. After all, in the world of academia, it's not every day that we stumble upon such an unconventional pairing, prompting us to question whether there truly is "something in the air," or perhaps, in the biological makeup of our cotton fields.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data revealed a surprisingly strong correlation between the use of genetically modified cotton in Georgia and automotive recalls related to vehicle speed control. The correlation coefficient was found to be 0.8782491, with an r-squared value of 0.7713215, indicating that approximately 77% of the variability in vehicle speed control recalls can be explained by the use of GMO cotton. This level of correlation would make even the most obtuse statistical skeptic raise an eyebrow more quizzically than a cat trying to understand quantum physics.

The p-value was found to be less than 0.01, signifying a statistically significant relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. It's as if these two unrelated entities were intertwined in a peculiar dance, akin to a tango between modern agricultural practices and automotive technology – a dance that we were not expecting to see, much like finding a stray sock in the cotton harvest.

To visually illustrate the strength of this association, Figure 1 displays a scatterplot showcasing the striking correlation between the use of GMO cotton in Georgia and the incidence of automotive recalls for issues with vehicle speed control. One might say that the relationship depicted in the plot is as clear as day, or rather, as crisp as a freshly pressed cotton shirt.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Georgia and Automotive recalls for issues with Vehicle Speed Control. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Genetically Modified Cotton and Cruise Control: An Unlikely Pair"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper aims to investigate the unexpected correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in the state of Georgia and automotive recalls related to issues with vehicle speed control. It presents findings from an analysis of data collected from the USDA and US DOT, covering the years 2000 to 2022. Our research team uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8782491 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong association between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The implications of this surprising connection are both thought-provoking and, dare we say, "cotton-picking curious." We invite readers to delve into the details of our findings, which may just shift their gears on the intersection of agricultural biotechnology and automotive engineering.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The unexpected link between genetically modified cotton in Georgia and automotive recalls for issues with vehicle speed control has left many researchers scratching their heads, much like a perplexing case of sudden crop failure or a mysterious engine malfunction. The literature on this intersection of agricultural biotechnology and automotive engineering is as sparse as a cotton field in winter, but a few studies have touched upon related topics.
Smith and Doe (2010) examined the impact of GMO cotton adoption on agricultural practices and found significant increases in yield and pest resistance. Meanwhile, Jones (2015) explored the complexities of vehicle speed control systems and their susceptibility to malfunctions, revealing a multitude of factors at play in the engineering and regulation of automotive technology. These studies offer valuable insights into the individual components of our curious correlation, but they don't quite bridge the gap between cotton and cruise control.
Turning to non-fiction books, "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan provides a comprehensive exploration of the modern food industry, including the role of genetically modified crops in agriculture. Similarly, "Faster: The Acceleration of Just About Everything" by James Gleick delves into the culture and technology of speed, though it focuses on the societal implications rather than the mechanics of automotive recalls.
Fiction also offers its share of tangentially related works. In "Cotton Malone" novels by Steve Berry, the protagonist's adventures may not directly involve GM cotton, but they do take readers on thrilling journeys that, not unlike our research, unravel unexpected mysteries. On the automotive side, the classic "Christine" by Stephen King presents a chilling tale of a possessed car, reminding us that the world of vehicles can be as enigmatic as a genetically modified crop.
In a somewhat unconventional research approach, our team also ventured into the realm of children's cartoons and stumbled upon "Cars," an animated film that anthropomorphizes automobiles. While Lightning McQueen and Mater may not provide scientific insights, their antics did offer a momentary distraction from the complexities of our investigation.
As we wade through this eclectic mix of literature and culture, we remain committed to unraveling the enigma of genetically modified cotton and cruise control. After all, as much as we appreciate a good pun, we're eager to bring clarity to this unexpected pairing, even if it means digging through literature as deeply as a root in a cotton field.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a surprisingly strong correlation between the use of genetically modified cotton in Georgia and automotive recalls related to vehicle speed control. The correlation coefficient was found to be 0.8782491, with an r-squared value of 0.7713215, indicating that approximately 77% of the variability in vehicle speed control recalls can be explained by the use of GMO cotton. This level of correlation would make even the most obtuse statistical skeptic raise an eyebrow more quizzically than a cat trying to understand quantum physics.
The p-value was found to be less than 0.01, signifying a statistically significant relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. It's as if these two unrelated entities were intertwined in a peculiar dance, akin to a tango between modern agricultural practices and automotive technology – a dance that we were not expecting to see, much like finding a stray sock in the cotton harvest.
To visually illustrate the strength of this association, Figure 1 displays a scatterplot showcasing the striking correlation between the use of GMO cotton in Georgia and the incidence of automotive recalls for issues with vehicle speed control. One might say that the relationship depicted in the plot is as clear as day, or rather, as crisp as a freshly pressed cotton shirt.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings have shed light, or perhaps cast a spotlight, on the unexpected relationship between the use of genetically modified cotton in Georgia and automotive recalls related to vehicle speed control. We can safely say that our results not only support but practically embrace the quizzical nature of this connection, much like a detective solving a case of agricultural intrigue meets automotive mystery. The statistically significant correlation coefficient and p-value endorse the notion that these seemingly distant realms of GMO cotton and cruise control have, for lack of a better phrase, revved up a fascinating partnership.

Harking back to the literature review, Smith and Doe's work on the impact of GMO cotton adoption takes on a whole new level of relevance, doesn't it? The significant increases in yield and pest resistance from genetically modified cotton now appear to have a ripple effect that extends all the way to the automotive industry, much like a tailwind unexpectedly sweeping through a field of cotton. And let's not overlook Jones' exploration of vehicle speed control systems. The complex interplay of factors he unveiled seems to have waltzed its way into our correlation, painting a picture of technological entanglement as rich and intricate as the finest tapestry.

It is as though our research has unraveled a spool of the most befuddling interconnectedness between the adoption of genetically modified cotton and the speed at which vehicles are recalled for control issues. This revelation has the potential to engage the minds of scientists and engineers alike, inspiring them to rethink the influences that agricultural practices can have on seemingly unrelated domains. After all, the sparks flying between these two distinct realms are more electrifying than a hybrid car running on both cotton and cruise control.

Our results may just be the tip of the iceberg, opening the door to further investigations into the ramifications of GMO use in agriculture and its unsuspected reach into the machinery of our everyday lives. We dare say this relationship is as intriguing as a well-crafted mystery – and just like a good mystery, it keeps us on the edge of our seats, eagerly awaiting the next twist in the plot.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Georgia and Automotive recalls for issues with Vehicle Speed Control. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Genetically Modified Cotton and Cruise Control: An Unlikely Pair"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper aims to investigate the unexpected correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in the state of Georgia and automotive recalls related to issues with vehicle speed control. It presents findings from an analysis of data collected from the USDA and US DOT, covering the years 2000 to 2022. Our research team uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8782491 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong association between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The implications of this surprising connection are both thought-provoking and, dare we say, "cotton-picking curious." We invite readers to delve into the details of our findings, which may just shift their gears on the intersection of agricultural biotechnology and automotive engineering.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
One might think that the world of genetically modified cotton and automotive technology exist in separate spheres, as different as night and day, or perhaps as varied as, well, cotton and cars. Yet, in the expansive landscape of agricultural biotechnology and mechanical engineering, sometimes the unexpected arises, much like a rogue weed amidst fields of neatly cultivated crops.
In this study, we delve into the curious case of genetically modified cotton in the cotton-rich state of Georgia and its peculiar connection to automotive recalls for issues with vehicle speed control. It's as if we stumbled upon a hidden thread, woven into the fabric of these two distinct domains, ultimately unraveled for all to inspect.
The research seeks to validate and make sense of this unlikely association, offering a statistically robust analysis of data collected from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Department of Transportation (DOT). Through a rigorous examination spanning the years 2000 to 2022, our findings reveal a surprising correlation, leaving us to ponder whether there's "more to this than meets the eye," much like a well-crafted cotton-picking pun.
As we proceed, we encourage readers to buckle up and embrace the unpredictable journey ahead as we unravel the mystery behind this seemingly inexplicable intersection of genetically modified cotton and cruise control. After all, in the world of academia, it's not every day that we stumble upon such an unconventional pairing, prompting us to question whether there truly is "something in the air," or perhaps, in the biological makeup of our cotton fields.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a surprisingly strong correlation between the use of genetically modified cotton in Georgia and automotive recalls related to vehicle speed control. The correlation coefficient was found to be 0.8782491, with an r-squared value of 0.7713215, indicating that approximately 77% of the variability in vehicle speed control recalls can be explained by the use of GMO cotton. This level of correlation would make even the most obtuse statistical skeptic raise an eyebrow more quizzically than a cat trying to understand quantum physics.
The p-value was found to be less than 0.01, signifying a statistically significant relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. It's as if these two unrelated entities were intertwined in a peculiar dance, akin to a tango between modern agricultural practices and automotive technology – a dance that we were not expecting to see, much like finding a stray sock in the cotton harvest.
To visually illustrate the strength of this association, Figure 1 displays a scatterplot showcasing the striking correlation between the use of GMO cotton in Georgia and the incidence of automotive recalls for issues with vehicle speed control. One might say that the relationship depicted in the plot is as clear as day, or rather, as crisp as a freshly pressed cotton shirt.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the findings of this study provide compelling evidence of a robust correlation between the use of genetically modified cotton in Georgia and automotive recalls related to vehicle speed control. The strength of this association, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8782491 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, raises eyebrows higher than a pair of windshield wipers in a torrential downpour. It's as if these two seemingly unrelated entities decided to carpool in a comically tiny coupe, leaving us scratching our heads more vigorously than a cat with an itch.

While the exact mechanisms underlying this peculiar relationship remain as enigmatic as the Bermuda Triangle, our research has shed light on a connection that is as unexpected as finding a mint under the driver's seat – undoubtedly surprising, but undeniably there. As we bring this investigation to a close, we can't help but marvel at the mysteriously interwoven nature of agricultural biotechnology and automotive engineering, a puzzling pairing that may just redefine the meaning of "crop circles."

In light of these findings, it is with great confidence, and perhaps the faintest hint of relief, that we assert no further research in this area is necessary. As the saying goes, "let sleeping cars lie," or in this case, perhaps "let the genetically modified cotton keep on growing – at a speed that won't trigger any recalls."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Genetically Modified Cotton and Cruise Control: An Unlikely Pair. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agricultural Genetics and Behavioral Engineering


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Genetically Modified Cotton and Cruise Control: An Unlikely Pair. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Agricultural Innovation and Technological Integration (SAITI)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Genetically Modified Cotton and Cruise Control: An Unlikely Pair with an abstract of This paper aims to investigate the unexpected correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in the state of Georgia and automotive recalls related to issues with vehicle speed control. It presents findings from an analysis of data collected from the USDA and US DOT, covering the years 2000 to 2022. Our research team uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8782491 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a strong association between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The implications of this surprising connection are both thought-provoking and, dare we say, "cotton-picking curious." We invite readers to delve into the details of our findings, which may just shift their gears on the intersection of agricultural biotechnology and automotive engineering.

ChatGPT:

"Genetically modified cotton," "GMO cotton," "cotton cultivation Georgia," "automotive recalls," "vehicle speed control issues," "USDA data," "US DOT data," "correlation coefficient analysis," "association between GMOs and automotive recalls," "agricultural biotechnology," "automotive engineering."

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in cotton in Georgia
Detailed data title: Percent of cotton planted in Georgia that is genetically modified to be herbicide-tolerant (HT), but not insect-resistant (Bt)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in cotton in Georgia

Automotive recalls for issues with Vehicle Speed Control
Source: US DOT
See what else correlates with Automotive recalls for issues with Vehicle Speed Control

Correlation r = 0.8782491 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7713215 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 77.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Automotive recalls for issues with Vehicle Speed Control) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in cotton in Georgia) over the 23 years from 2000 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.6E-8. 0.0000000361799492741782100000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.88 in 3.6E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 27,639,619 random variables You don't actually need 27 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 22 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 22 because we have two variables measured over a period of 23 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.73, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in cotton in Georgia (GMO cotton %)32435532231113105786710455431341
Automotive recalls for issues with Vehicle Speed Control (Recalls)15152715181511103611734766321412




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([32,43,55,32,23,11,13,10,5,7,8,6,7,10,4,5,5,4,3,1,3,4,1,])
array_2 = np.array([15,15,27,15,18,15,11,10,3,6,11,7,3,4,7,6,6,3,2,1,4,1,2,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in cotton in Georgia"
array_2_name = "Automotive recalls for issues with Vehicle Speed Control"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is stellar!


Correlation ID: 3884 · Black Variable ID: 782 · Red Variable ID: 1110
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0