Download png, svg
AI explanation
The genetically modified cotton in Georgia was inadvertently transmitting internet-blocking signals, leading to a decrease in online activity whenever the cotton was in full bloom. As a result, fewer people were able to access the internet to search for Matt Parker, causing his Google searches to decrease.Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a high-tech cotton field in Georgia where rows of genetically modified cotton plants are bathed in sunlight. A farmer is depicted using a smartphone to search for "matt parker" on Google. The cotton plants sway gently in the breeze, and the scene exudes a futuristic, high-tech vibe. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in cotton in Georgia and Google searches for 'matt parker'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Sci-fi fantacy High-tech Low poly A photo-realistic image Photorealism
ChatGPT: High-tech
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in cotton in Georgia and Google searches for 'matt parker' together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a cotton field in Georgia, rows of genetically modified cotton plants stretch out towards the horizon under a bright sun. Nearby, a farmer uses his smartphone to search for "matt parker" on Google, while the cotton plants sway gently in the breeze.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ High-tech ] and depicting this scene: In a cotton field in Georgia, rows of genetically modified cotton plants stretch out towards the horizon under a bright sun. Nearby, a farmer uses his smartphone to search for "matt parker" on Google, while the cotton plants sway gently in the breeze. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a high-tech cotton field in Georgia where rows of genetically modified cotton plants are bathed in sunlight. A farmer is depicted using a smartphone to search for "matt parker" on Google. The cotton plants sway gently in the breeze, and the scene exudes a futuristic, high-tech vibe.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in GMO use in cotton in Georgia caused matt parker (Google searches for 'matt parker') to decrease.
AI academic paper
Cotton Pickin' Math: The Gossypium Hirsutum Hypothesis - Examining the Correlation Between GMO Cotton Cultivation in Georgia and Google Searches for 'Matt Parker' The Journal of Agricultural Math and Googling Patterns Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Georgia and Google searches for 'matt parker'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.
Your research team used data from USDA and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9150623 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2022.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Cotton Pickin' Math: The Gossypium Hirsutum Hypothesis - Examining the Correlation Between GMO Cotton Cultivation in Georgia and Google Searches for 'Matt Parker'"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the quirky and unexpected relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in Georgia and the online activity of individuals searching for the mathematically-inclined YouTuber, Matt Parker. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, our research team applied statistical analysis to unravel the mysterious link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The results revealed a notably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9150623 and a level of significance with p < 0.01, spanning the years from 2004 to 2022. In this context, our findings shed light on the peculiar interplay between agricultural biotechnology and digital curiosity, offering a tantalizing glimpse into the whimsical world of mathematical cotton cultivation. With this research, we aim to add a touch of lightheartedness to the often serious realm of agricultural and mathematical studies, while presenting a thought-provoking correlation that may prompt further investigation and amusement.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Georgia and Google searches for 'matt parker'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Cotton Pickin' Math: The Gossypium Hirsutum Hypothesis - Examining the Correlation Between GMO Cotton Cultivation in Georgia and Google Searches for 'Matt Parker'"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the quirky and unexpected relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in Georgia and the online activity of individuals searching for the mathematically-inclined YouTuber, Matt Parker. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, our research team applied statistical analysis to unravel the mysterious link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The results revealed a notably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9150623 and a level of significance with p < 0.01, spanning the years from 2004 to 2022. In this context, our findings shed light on the peculiar interplay between agricultural biotechnology and digital curiosity, offering a tantalizing glimpse into the whimsical world of mathematical cotton cultivation. With this research, we aim to add a touch of lightheartedness to the often serious realm of agricultural and mathematical studies, while presenting a thought-provoking correlation that may prompt further investigation and amusement.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of agricultural biotechnology and mathematical musings may seem like two entirely unrelated domains, but our study - "Cotton Pickin' Math: The Gossypium Hirsutum Hypothesis" - endeavors to unravel the intriguing correlation between them. In recent years, the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton has seen burgeoning success in the cotton fields of Georgia, touting higher yields, improved pest resistance, and perhaps unexpectedly, an unforeseen connection to the online activity of individuals enthusiastically searching for the charismatic mathematician and YouTuber, Matt Parker.
Now, before you conjure thoughts of GM cotton whispering Pythagoras' theorem to its neighboring crops or Matt Parker donning a cotton-picking hat for his next YouTube video, let's dig deeper into this surprising synchrony. Our research marries fields as diverse as a sunflower with a slide rule, aiming to inject a touch of whimsy into the often buttoned-up realms of agriculture and mathematics.
As we delve into the intricacies of this peculiarity, we hope to spark your curiosity and offer a jocular take on the seemingly serious worlds of agricultural innovation and mathematical entertainment. So, grab a bale of cotton and a pocket calculator, and let's journey through this unexpected correlation that may just leave you cottoning onto the unlikely links between GMO cotton and Google searches for 'Matt Parker'.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Georgia and Google searches for 'matt parker'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Cotton Pickin' Math: The Gossypium Hirsutum Hypothesis - Examining the Correlation Between GMO Cotton Cultivation in Georgia and Google Searches for 'Matt Parker'"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the quirky and unexpected relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in Georgia and the online activity of individuals searching for the mathematically-inclined YouTuber, Matt Parker. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, our research team applied statistical analysis to unravel the mysterious link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The results revealed a notably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9150623 and a level of significance with p < 0.01, spanning the years from 2004 to 2022. In this context, our findings shed light on the peculiar interplay between agricultural biotechnology and digital curiosity, offering a tantalizing glimpse into the whimsical world of mathematical cotton cultivation. With this research, we aim to add a touch of lightheartedness to the often serious realm of agricultural and mathematical studies, while presenting a thought-provoking correlation that may prompt further investigation and amusement.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of agricultural biotechnology and mathematical musings may seem like two entirely unrelated domains, but our study - "Cotton Pickin' Math: The Gossypium Hirsutum Hypothesis" - endeavors to unravel the intriguing correlation between them. In recent years, the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton has seen burgeoning success in the cotton fields of Georgia, touting higher yields, improved pest resistance, and perhaps unexpectedly, an unforeseen connection to the online activity of individuals enthusiastically searching for the charismatic mathematician and YouTuber, Matt Parker.
Now, before you conjure thoughts of GM cotton whispering Pythagoras' theorem to its neighboring crops or Matt Parker donning a cotton-picking hat for his next YouTube video, let's dig deeper into this surprising synchrony. Our research marries fields as diverse as a sunflower with a slide rule, aiming to inject a touch of whimsy into the often buttoned-up realms of agriculture and mathematics.
As we delve into the intricacies of this peculiarity, we hope to spark your curiosity and offer a jocular take on the seemingly serious worlds of agricultural innovation and mathematical entertainment. So, grab a bale of cotton and a pocket calculator, and let's journey through this unexpected correlation that may just leave you cottoning onto the unlikely links between GMO cotton and Google searches for 'Matt Parker'.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The correlation between GMO cotton cultivation and the online phenomenon of individuals searching for the mathematical virtuoso, Matt Parker, has spurred a range of research probing this peculiar connection. Smith et al. (2018) conducted a comprehensive analysis of GMO cotton adoption in Georgia, exploring its impact on yields, pest management, and economic implications. Surprisingly, buried within their findings was a curious notation of an elevated frequency of 'Matt Parker' Google searches among cotton farmers utilizing GMO seeds. This unexpected observation raised eyebrows and prompted further investigations into the far-reaching implications of biotechnological interventions in agricultural practices.
Doe and Jones (2020) delved into the complexities of digital trends and online behavior, striving to decode the enigma of seemingly unrelated search queries. Their meticulous study uncovered a subtle, yet statistically significant, association between the burgeoning popularity of GMO cotton and the surge in online interest in the world of mathematical puzzles and conundrums. As they combed through mounds of data, a pattern emerged, illustrating a compelling link between agricultural innovation and digital diversions, piquing the curiosity of researchers and internet aficionados alike.
In "The Impact of GMOs on Modern Agriculture" by Green (2015), the author delves into the multifaceted ramifications of genetically modified organisms in crop production. However, nestled among the discussions of crop resilience and environmental concerns, lies a riveting footnote highlighting an unexpected surge in searches for 'Matt Parker' within regions known for GMO cotton cultivation. This seemingly trivial tidbit fuels speculation about the intricacies of human behavior in the digital age and raises questions about the underlying motivations driving cyber inquiries.
Turning to non-fiction sources, "The Botany of Desire" by Michael Pollan explores the intricate relationships between humans and plants, unearthing the complex web of interconnections that shape our interactions with the botanical world. Amidst the musings on apples, tulips, cannabis, and potatoes, Pollan unfurls a tangential thread - the curious correlation between GMO cotton cultivation and the online quest for mathematical enlightenment embodied by 'Matt Parker'. This unexpected confluence of subjects paints a whimsical picture of the intertwined fates of nature and digital curiosity.
In a more fictional realm, "The Da Vinci Code" by Dan Brown captivates readers with its cryptic puzzles and intellectual intrigue, mirroring the insatiable thirst for mathematical enigmas embodied by Matt Parker's online persona. While Brown's novel delves into the realms of art, history, and religious symbology, the underlying quest for truth and hidden connections echoes the whimsical juxtaposition of GMO cotton and 'Matt Parker' searches, adding a sprinkle of mystery to the seemingly mundane world of agriculture and digital queries.
As the literature weaves a tapestry of unexpected connections, the exploration of this peculiar correlation extends into unconventional realms, including cartoons and children's shows. In the vibrant world of animated entertainment, "Phineas and Ferb" introduces viewers to a quirky duo embarking on whimsical adventures while also enticing the curious minds of adults, akin to the way Matt Parker's mathematical content captivates digital audiences. This parallel underscores the delightful and unexpected harmonies that emerge when seemingly disparate domains converge, injecting a dose of levity and amusement into the earnest pursuit of understanding the GMO cotton-Matt Parker nexus.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Georgia and Google searches for 'matt parker'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2022
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Cotton Pickin' Math: The Gossypium Hirsutum Hypothesis - Examining the Correlation Between GMO Cotton Cultivation in Georgia and Google Searches for 'Matt Parker'"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the quirky and unexpected relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in Georgia and the online activity of individuals searching for the mathematically-inclined YouTuber, Matt Parker. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, our research team applied statistical analysis to unravel the mysterious link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The results revealed a notably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9150623 and a level of significance with p < 0.01, spanning the years from 2004 to 2022. In this context, our findings shed light on the peculiar interplay between agricultural biotechnology and digital curiosity, offering a tantalizing glimpse into the whimsical world of mathematical cotton cultivation. With this research, we aim to add a touch of lightheartedness to the often serious realm of agricultural and mathematical studies, while presenting a thought-provoking correlation that may prompt further investigation and amusement.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of agricultural biotechnology and mathematical musings may seem like two entirely unrelated domains, but our study - "Cotton Pickin' Math: The Gossypium Hirsutum Hypothesis" - endeavors to unravel the intriguing correlation between them. In recent years, the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton has seen burgeoning success in the cotton fields of Georgia, touting higher yields, improved pest resistance, and perhaps unexpectedly, an unforeseen connection to the online activity of individuals enthusiastically searching for the charismatic mathematician and YouTuber, Matt Parker.
Now, before you conjure thoughts of GM cotton whispering Pythagoras' theorem to its neighboring crops or Matt Parker donning a cotton-picking hat for his next YouTube video, let's dig deeper into this surprising synchrony. Our research marries fields as diverse as a sunflower with a slide rule, aiming to inject a touch of whimsy into the often buttoned-up realms of agriculture and mathematics.
As we delve into the intricacies of this peculiarity, we hope to spark your curiosity and offer a jocular take on the seemingly serious worlds of agricultural innovation and mathematical entertainment. So, grab a bale of cotton and a pocket calculator, and let's journey through this unexpected correlation that may just leave you cottoning onto the unlikely links between GMO cotton and Google searches for 'Matt Parker'.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To unweave the whimsical web of GMO cotton and Matt Parker fandom, our research team embarked on a comically convoluted journey that involved data collection methods as diverse as a Fibonacci sequence and a Google Doodle for π – with a dash of serendipity thrown in for good measure.
Data Collection:
We harnessed the bountiful resources of the internet, trawling through USDA databases like cotton aficionados on a treasure hunt. Our intrepid researchers also summoned the robust power of Google Trends to track the ebbs and flows of online searches for the enigmatic 'Matt Parker' across the years.
The implementation of GMO cotton in Georgia was meticulously documented through official agricultural records, and we must confess, there was an abundance of cotton-picking puns exchanged while sifting through these agricultural archives.
Statistical Analysis:
Armed with an arsenal of statistical tools, ranging from scatterplots to a PowerPoint presentation on the statistical significance of dad jokes, our team sought to quantify the relationship between GMO cotton cultivation and Google searches for 'Matt Parker'. As we dove into the data, our team passionately debated whether to employ Hypothesis Testing or Hypotenuse Testing – we eventually settled on the former.
Time Span:
The research period spanned from 2004 to 2022, capturing the undulations of GMO cotton adoption and Matt Parker's burgeoning online fame. This considerable timeline provided the canvas for our analysis, allowing us to paint a detailed picture of the evolving relationship between genetically modified cotton plants and Internet surfers seeking mathematical merriment.
The Big Reveal:
After untangling the webs of data and statistics, our findings sparkled with a revelation so surprising, it could make even the most stoic statistician leap for joy. The correlation coefficient between GMO cotton cultivation in Georgia and Google searches for 'Matt Parker' stood at a remarkable 0.9150623, causing our team to wonder whether there was a mathematical equation hidden in the cotton fields of Georgia.
Significance:
The level of significance? P < 0.01, signaling that this correlation wasn't just an amusing coincidence but a statistically robust phenomenon. The results left our researchers scratching their heads in amusement, pondering the delightful juxtaposition of agricultural innovation and online mathematical curiosity.
Though our methods may have been as winding as a Fibonacci spiral, the light-hearted spirit with which we approached this research adds a touch of mirth to the often sober arenas of agricultural and mathematical studies. The correlation between GMO cotton and 'Matt Parker' searches is more than just a statistical curiosity – it's a delightful confluence of agricultural innovation and digital enchantment, offering a whimsical twist to the sometimes serious world of research.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Georgia and Google searches for 'matt parker'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends .
For the time period 2004 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9150623, r-squared of 0.8373391, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Cotton Pickin' Math: The Gossypium Hirsutum Hypothesis - Examining the Correlation Between GMO Cotton Cultivation in Georgia and Google Searches for 'Matt Parker'"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the quirky and unexpected relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in Georgia and the online activity of individuals searching for the mathematically-inclined YouTuber, Matt Parker. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, our research team applied statistical analysis to unravel the mysterious link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The results revealed a notably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9150623 and a level of significance with p < 0.01, spanning the years from 2004 to 2022. In this context, our findings shed light on the peculiar interplay between agricultural biotechnology and digital curiosity, offering a tantalizing glimpse into the whimsical world of mathematical cotton cultivation. With this research, we aim to add a touch of lightheartedness to the often serious realm of agricultural and mathematical studies, while presenting a thought-provoking correlation that may prompt further investigation and amusement.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of agricultural biotechnology and mathematical musings may seem like two entirely unrelated domains, but our study - "Cotton Pickin' Math: The Gossypium Hirsutum Hypothesis" - endeavors to unravel the intriguing correlation between them. In recent years, the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton has seen burgeoning success in the cotton fields of Georgia, touting higher yields, improved pest resistance, and perhaps unexpectedly, an unforeseen connection to the online activity of individuals enthusiastically searching for the charismatic mathematician and YouTuber, Matt Parker.
Now, before you conjure thoughts of GM cotton whispering Pythagoras' theorem to its neighboring crops or Matt Parker donning a cotton-picking hat for his next YouTube video, let's dig deeper into this surprising synchrony. Our research marries fields as diverse as a sunflower with a slide rule, aiming to inject a touch of whimsy into the often buttoned-up realms of agriculture and mathematics.
As we delve into the intricacies of this peculiarity, we hope to spark your curiosity and offer a jocular take on the seemingly serious worlds of agricultural innovation and mathematical entertainment. So, grab a bale of cotton and a pocket calculator, and let's journey through this unexpected correlation that may just leave you cottoning onto the unlikely links between GMO cotton and Google searches for 'Matt Parker'.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
Upon conducting our analysis, we found an impressive correlation coefficient of 0.9150623 between the adoption of GMO cotton in Georgia and the frequency of Google searches for 'Matt Parker.' The r-squared value of 0.8373391 further underpins the robustness of this relationship, suggesting that 83.7% of the variability in 'Matt Parker' searches can be explained by the variation in GMO cotton cultivation.
The level of statistical significance was striking, with p < 0.01, indicating a high degree of certainty in the observed correlation. This lends strong support to the notion that there's more to this link than mere coincidence or statistical fluff.
Fig. 1 reveals a visually compelling scatterplot, showing a near-linear relationship between GMO cotton cultivation and Google searches for 'Matt Parker.' It seems that the cotton fields of Georgia and the digital savvy fans of Matt Parker are not as distant as one might initially assume.
This unexpected correlation raises some intriguing questions, perhaps suggesting that the allure of mathematical musings extends beyond just the confines of the classroom and into the realm of agricultural innovation. It appears that the genetic tinkering in cotton plants and the virtual hunt for mathematical marvels have a mysterious meeting point that transcends the mundane divisions of agribusiness and internet culture.
The strength of this correlation invites a delightful array of speculation and jest, prompting us to ponder: Is Matt Parker secretly spreading mathematical secrets to the cotton plants through the ether? Or are GMO cotton farmers simply searching for tips on how to calculate the optimal spacing between their cotton rows?
These findings are a testament to the whimsical and unexpected ways in which disparate facets of our world can intersect. They also underscore the enduring merits of pursuing seemingly incongruous lines of inquiry, as it may lead to delightful surprises and a more nuanced understanding of the interconnections that shape our modern world.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Georgia and Google searches for 'matt parker'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
"Cotton Pickin' Math: The Gossypium Hirsutum Hypothesis - Examining the Correlation Between GMO Cotton Cultivation in Georgia and Google Searches for 'Matt Parker'"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the quirky and unexpected relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in Georgia and the online activity of individuals searching for the mathematically-inclined YouTuber, Matt Parker. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, our research team applied statistical analysis to unravel the mysterious link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The results revealed a notably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9150623 and a level of significance with p < 0.01, spanning the years from 2004 to 2022. In this context, our findings shed light on the peculiar interplay between agricultural biotechnology and digital curiosity, offering a tantalizing glimpse into the whimsical world of mathematical cotton cultivation. With this research, we aim to add a touch of lightheartedness to the often serious realm of agricultural and mathematical studies, while presenting a thought-provoking correlation that may prompt further investigation and amusement.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The correlation between GMO cotton cultivation and the online phenomenon of individuals searching for the mathematical virtuoso, Matt Parker, has spurred a range of research probing this peculiar connection. Smith et al. (2018) conducted a comprehensive analysis of GMO cotton adoption in Georgia, exploring its impact on yields, pest management, and economic implications. Surprisingly, buried within their findings was a curious notation of an elevated frequency of 'Matt Parker' Google searches among cotton farmers utilizing GMO seeds. This unexpected observation raised eyebrows and prompted further investigations into the far-reaching implications of biotechnological interventions in agricultural practices.
Doe and Jones (2020) delved into the complexities of digital trends and online behavior, striving to decode the enigma of seemingly unrelated search queries. Their meticulous study uncovered a subtle, yet statistically significant, association between the burgeoning popularity of GMO cotton and the surge in online interest in the world of mathematical puzzles and conundrums. As they combed through mounds of data, a pattern emerged, illustrating a compelling link between agricultural innovation and digital diversions, piquing the curiosity of researchers and internet aficionados alike.
In "The Impact of GMOs on Modern Agriculture" by Green (2015), the author delves into the multifaceted ramifications of genetically modified organisms in crop production. However, nestled among the discussions of crop resilience and environmental concerns, lies a riveting footnote highlighting an unexpected surge in searches for 'Matt Parker' within regions known for GMO cotton cultivation. This seemingly trivial tidbit fuels speculation about the intricacies of human behavior in the digital age and raises questions about the underlying motivations driving cyber inquiries.
Turning to non-fiction sources, "The Botany of Desire" by Michael Pollan explores the intricate relationships between humans and plants, unearthing the complex web of interconnections that shape our interactions with the botanical world. Amidst the musings on apples, tulips, cannabis, and potatoes, Pollan unfurls a tangential thread - the curious correlation between GMO cotton cultivation and the online quest for mathematical enlightenment embodied by 'Matt Parker'. This unexpected confluence of subjects paints a whimsical picture of the intertwined fates of nature and digital curiosity.
In a more fictional realm, "The Da Vinci Code" by Dan Brown captivates readers with its cryptic puzzles and intellectual intrigue, mirroring the insatiable thirst for mathematical enigmas embodied by Matt Parker's online persona. While Brown's novel delves into the realms of art, history, and religious symbology, the underlying quest for truth and hidden connections echoes the whimsical juxtaposition of GMO cotton and 'Matt Parker' searches, adding a sprinkle of mystery to the seemingly mundane world of agriculture and digital queries.
As the literature weaves a tapestry of unexpected connections, the exploration of this peculiar correlation extends into unconventional realms, including cartoons and children's shows. In the vibrant world of animated entertainment, "Phineas and Ferb" introduces viewers to a quirky duo embarking on whimsical adventures while also enticing the curious minds of adults, akin to the way Matt Parker's mathematical content captivates digital audiences. This parallel underscores the delightful and unexpected harmonies that emerge when seemingly disparate domains converge, injecting a dose of levity and amusement into the earnest pursuit of understanding the GMO cotton-Matt Parker nexus.
[[RESULTS]]
Upon conducting our analysis, we found an impressive correlation coefficient of 0.9150623 between the adoption of GMO cotton in Georgia and the frequency of Google searches for 'Matt Parker.' The r-squared value of 0.8373391 further underpins the robustness of this relationship, suggesting that 83.7% of the variability in 'Matt Parker' searches can be explained by the variation in GMO cotton cultivation.
The level of statistical significance was striking, with p < 0.01, indicating a high degree of certainty in the observed correlation. This lends strong support to the notion that there's more to this link than mere coincidence or statistical fluff.
Fig. 1 reveals a visually compelling scatterplot, showing a near-linear relationship between GMO cotton cultivation and Google searches for 'Matt Parker.' It seems that the cotton fields of Georgia and the digital savvy fans of Matt Parker are not as distant as one might initially assume.
This unexpected correlation raises some intriguing questions, perhaps suggesting that the allure of mathematical musings extends beyond just the confines of the classroom and into the realm of agricultural innovation. It appears that the genetic tinkering in cotton plants and the virtual hunt for mathematical marvels have a mysterious meeting point that transcends the mundane divisions of agribusiness and internet culture.
The strength of this correlation invites a delightful array of speculation and jest, prompting us to ponder: Is Matt Parker secretly spreading mathematical secrets to the cotton plants through the ether? Or are GMO cotton farmers simply searching for tips on how to calculate the optimal spacing between their cotton rows?
These findings are a testament to the whimsical and unexpected ways in which disparate facets of our world can intersect. They also underscore the enduring merits of pursuing seemingly incongruous lines of inquiry, as it may lead to delightful surprises and a more nuanced understanding of the interconnections that shape our modern world.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The unfathomable connection between genetically modified cotton and the quirky allure of online searches for 'Matt Parker' has left us scratching our heads with bemusement and wonder. Our robust correlation coefficient, as well as the r-squared value, not only supports the existing literature but also unveils the enigmatic dance between agricultural biotechnology and digital eccentricities.
Drawing from the whimsical literature review, our findings lend statistical weight to the peculiar linkage that had been playfully teased by Smith et al. (2018), Doe and Jones (2020), and even made cameo appearances in works as diverse as Michael Pollan's "The Botany of Desire" and Dan Brown's "The Da Vinci Code." The results validate the prior observations spearheaded by agricultural researchers and digital trend trackers, reinforcing the notion that this unexpected correlation is more than mere happenstance.
Indeed, the visually compelling scatterplot in Fig. 1 paints a delightful picture – one that suggests the cotton fields of Georgia and the mathematically-inclined denizens of the internet are engaged in an intricate waltz of intrigue and inquiry. The strength of our correlation prompts us to conjure up whimsical scenarios, such as envisioning Matt Parker subtly disseminating mathematical secrets to the cotton plants through the digital ether.
Are GMO cotton farmers clandestinely seeking guidance on perplexing mathematical conundrums, or are they simply attempting to calculate the optimal spacing between their cotton rows using Parker's mathematical prowess? These notions might sound amusing, but they serve to underscore the curious ways in which disparate domains intertwine in the complex fabric of our modern world.
In conclusion...
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Georgia and Google searches for 'matt parker'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Cotton Pickin' Math: The Gossypium Hirsutum Hypothesis - Examining the Correlation Between GMO Cotton Cultivation in Georgia and Google Searches for 'Matt Parker'"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the quirky and unexpected relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in Georgia and the online activity of individuals searching for the mathematically-inclined YouTuber, Matt Parker. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, our research team applied statistical analysis to unravel the mysterious link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The results revealed a notably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9150623 and a level of significance with p < 0.01, spanning the years from 2004 to 2022. In this context, our findings shed light on the peculiar interplay between agricultural biotechnology and digital curiosity, offering a tantalizing glimpse into the whimsical world of mathematical cotton cultivation. With this research, we aim to add a touch of lightheartedness to the often serious realm of agricultural and mathematical studies, while presenting a thought-provoking correlation that may prompt further investigation and amusement.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of agricultural biotechnology and mathematical musings may seem like two entirely unrelated domains, but our study - "Cotton Pickin' Math: The Gossypium Hirsutum Hypothesis" - endeavors to unravel the intriguing correlation between them. In recent years, the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton has seen burgeoning success in the cotton fields of Georgia, touting higher yields, improved pest resistance, and perhaps unexpectedly, an unforeseen connection to the online activity of individuals enthusiastically searching for the charismatic mathematician and YouTuber, Matt Parker.
Now, before you conjure thoughts of GM cotton whispering Pythagoras' theorem to its neighboring crops or Matt Parker donning a cotton-picking hat for his next YouTube video, let's dig deeper into this surprising synchrony. Our research marries fields as diverse as a sunflower with a slide rule, aiming to inject a touch of whimsy into the often buttoned-up realms of agriculture and mathematics.
As we delve into the intricacies of this peculiarity, we hope to spark your curiosity and offer a jocular take on the seemingly serious worlds of agricultural innovation and mathematical entertainment. So, grab a bale of cotton and a pocket calculator, and let's journey through this unexpected correlation that may just leave you cottoning onto the unlikely links between GMO cotton and Google searches for 'Matt Parker'.
[[RESULTS]]
Upon conducting our analysis, we found an impressive correlation coefficient of 0.9150623 between the adoption of GMO cotton in Georgia and the frequency of Google searches for 'Matt Parker.' The r-squared value of 0.8373391 further underpins the robustness of this relationship, suggesting that 83.7% of the variability in 'Matt Parker' searches can be explained by the variation in GMO cotton cultivation.
The level of statistical significance was striking, with p < 0.01, indicating a high degree of certainty in the observed correlation. This lends strong support to the notion that there's more to this link than mere coincidence or statistical fluff.
Fig. 1 reveals a visually compelling scatterplot, showing a near-linear relationship between GMO cotton cultivation and Google searches for 'Matt Parker.' It seems that the cotton fields of Georgia and the digital savvy fans of Matt Parker are not as distant as one might initially assume.
This unexpected correlation raises some intriguing questions, perhaps suggesting that the allure of mathematical musings extends beyond just the confines of the classroom and into the realm of agricultural innovation. It appears that the genetic tinkering in cotton plants and the virtual hunt for mathematical marvels have a mysterious meeting point that transcends the mundane divisions of agribusiness and internet culture.
The strength of this correlation invites a delightful array of speculation and jest, prompting us to ponder: Is Matt Parker secretly spreading mathematical secrets to the cotton plants through the ether? Or are GMO cotton farmers simply searching for tips on how to calculate the optimal spacing between their cotton rows?
These findings are a testament to the whimsical and unexpected ways in which disparate facets of our world can intersect. They also underscore the enduring merits of pursuing seemingly incongruous lines of inquiry, as it may lead to delightful surprises and a more nuanced understanding of the interconnections that shape our modern world.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
Truly, the interplay between GMO cotton in Georgia and Google searches for 'Matt Parker' has left us perplexed, amused, and maybe in need of a cotton swab to clean out our ears. Who would have thought that the mathematical musings of a YouTuber could be so closely entwined with the genetic modification of our fluffy cotton companions? It seems that these seeds of curiosity have sprouted some truly unexpected results.
As we wrap up our study, we can't help but wonder: Could juggling math equations amidst the cotton fields yield higher crop yields? Perhaps a sprinkle of mathematical magic is what the cotton crop needs to reach new heights. Or maybe, just maybe, Matt Parker's charm has stealthily infiltrated the very DNA of GMO cotton, sparking an inexplicable correlation that would have even the most seasoned statistician scratching their head.
Alas, our findings have awakened a myriad of whimsical possibilities and youthful curiosities. However, we must bid adieu to this peculiar puzzle and refrain from combing any further through this unique correlation. It seems that while the cotton plant may keep secrets close to its vest, the connection between its genetic modifications and online fascination for math-savvy entertainers is a riddle we are content to leave unsolved. With that, we conclude that no more research is needed in this delightful, cotton-pickin', mathematically-inclined realm—our plates are full, and it's time to sow the seeds of inquiry elsewhere!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Cotton Pickin' Math: The Gossypium Hirsutum Hypothesis - Examining the Correlation Between GMO Cotton Cultivation in Georgia and Google Searches for 'Matt Parker'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Agricultural Math and Googling Patterns
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Cotton Pickin' Math: The Gossypium Hirsutum Hypothesis - Examining the Correlation Between GMO Cotton Cultivation in Georgia and Google Searches for 'Matt Parker'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Society for Agricultural Innovation and Research
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Cotton Pickin' Math: The Gossypium Hirsutum Hypothesis - Examining the Correlation Between GMO Cotton Cultivation in Georgia and Google Searches for 'Matt Parker' with an abstract of This study examines the quirky and unexpected relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in Georgia and the online activity of individuals searching for the mathematically-inclined YouTuber, Matt Parker. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, our research team applied statistical analysis to unravel the mysterious link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The results revealed a notably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9150623 and a level of significance with p < 0.01, spanning the years from 2004 to 2022. In this context, our findings shed light on the peculiar interplay between agricultural biotechnology and digital curiosity, offering a tantalizing glimpse into the whimsical world of mathematical cotton cultivation. With this research, we aim to add a touch of lightheartedness to the often serious realm of agricultural and mathematical studies, while presenting a thought-provoking correlation that may prompt further investigation and amusement.
ChatGPT:
"GMO cotton cultivation Georgia," "Matt Parker Google searches," "correlation GMO cotton Matt Parker," "agricultural biotechnology digital curiosity," "Gossypium Hirsutum hypothesis," "USDA cotton cultivation data," "Google Trends analysis," "mathematical cotton cultivation," "whimsical agricultural studies," "correlation coefficient significance p-value," "unrelated phenomena correlation," "agricultural biotechnology curiosity correlation," "Matt Parker YouTube math," "GMO cotton adoption correlation," "unexpected research findings," "agricultural and mathematical studies correlation," "interplay GMO cotton searches."
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
GMO use in cotton in GeorgiaDetailed data title: Percent of cotton planted in Georgia that is genetically modified to be herbicide-tolerant (HT), but not insect-resistant (Bt)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in cotton in Georgia
Google searches for 'matt parker'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'matt parker' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
See what else correlates with Google searches for 'matt parker'
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.8373391 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 83.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'matt parker') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in cotton in Georgia) over the 19 years from 2004 through 2022.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.08E-8. 0.0000000407798129718478160000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 4.08E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 24,521,937 random variables You don't actually need 24 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.79, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
GMO use in cotton in Georgia (GMO cotton %) | 23 | 11 | 13 | 10 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 10 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 1 |
Google searches for 'matt parker' (Rel. search volume) | 38.5 | 26.4167 | 24.8333 | 17.5833 | 16.3333 | 15.1667 | 19.9167 | 22.1667 | 16.5 | 14.75 | 16.25 | 14.5 | 14.0833 | 11.6667 | 10 | 11 | 10.4167 | 10.1667 | 10.5 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([23,11,13,10,5,7,8,6,7,10,4,5,5,4,3,1,3,4,1,])
array_2 = np.array([38.5,26.4167,24.8333,17.5833,16.3333,15.1667,19.9167,22.1667,16.5,14.75,16.25,14.5,14.0833,11.6667,10,11,10.4167,10.1667,10.5,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in cotton in Georgia"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'matt parker'"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only GMO use in cotton in Georgia
- Line chart for only Google searches for 'matt parker'
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Cotton Pickin' Math: The Gossypium Hirsutum Hypothesis - Examining the Correlation Between GMO Cotton Cultivation in Georgia and Google Searches for 'Matt Parker'
You're a rater extraordinaire!
Correlation ID: 1694 · Black Variable ID: 782 · Red Variable ID: 1489