Report an error
GMO use in cotton correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Fossil fuel use in Netherlands Antilles | r=0.96 | 22yrs | No |
Google searches for 'desktop background' | r=0.96 | 16yrs | Yes! |
Arson in New Hampshire | r=0.93 | 23yrs | Yes! |
Asthma prevalence in American children | r=0.93 | 17yrs | No |
National Lacrosse Champions' Final Point | r=0.91 | 23yrs | Yes! |
The divorce rate in Oklahoma | r=0.91 | 18yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Erick | r=0.87 | 23yrs | No |
Votes for the Democratic Presidential candidate in South Dakota | r=0.86 | 6yrs | Yes! |
The average age of batters for the Boston Red Sox | r=0.86 | 23yrs | No |
The number of aircraft mechanics in Kansas | r=0.84 | 20yrs | No |
GMO use in cotton also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)