Report an error
Popularity of the first name Denver correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Centene's stock price (CNC) | r=0.99 | 21yrs | Yes! |
Vertex Pharmaceuticals' stock price (VRTX) | r=0.98 | 21yrs | Yes! |
Xcel Energy's stock price (XEL) | r=0.98 | 21yrs | Yes! |
Solar power generated in South Korea | r=0.97 | 32yrs | Yes! |
Marriott International's stock price (MAR) | r=0.97 | 21yrs | Yes! |
Google's Net Income | r=0.97 | 19yrs | No |
Intel's stock price (INTC) | r=0.91 | 21yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Denver also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)