Report an error
Heineken Cup Final winning team score correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of computer network support specialists in Virginia | r=0.87 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the 'call me maybe' meme | r=0.72 | 11yrs | No |
Google searches for 'how to build a bunker' | r=0.62 | 19yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'titanic' | r=0.61 | 19yrs | No |
The number of dietitians and nutritionists in Ohio | r=0.57 | 20yrs | No |
Rain in Miami | r=0.57 | 27yrs | No |
Hot days in Phoenix | r=0.57 | 27yrs | No |
The number of movies Nicole Kidman appeared in | r=0.53 | 27yrs | No |
Heineken Cup Final winning team score also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)