about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,096 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Heineken Cup Final winning team score and the second variable is Google searches for 'how to build a bunker'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The higher score serves as a "blast" of inspiration for fans, leading to an explosive interest in bunker construction. As the winning team's score rises, so does the "underground" knowledge of bunker building, creating a real "bomb" of a correlation!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Style: Abstract impressionism Image prompt: Create an abstract, vibrant portrayal of a bustling pub filled with excited rugby fans celebrating the Heineken Cup Final. Show a dynamic scene where the fans' emotions fluctuate as the winning team's score changes. At the forefront, depict a group of exuberant fans cheering and raising their drinks in jubilation. As the winning team's score decreases, convey a subtle decrease in the number of people focused on their phones, with a noticeable decline in searches for "how to build a bunker." In the background, subtly hint at a few individuals engaged in a deep conversation about the ancient tradition of building bunkers as a form of consolation for the losing team. Let the composition capture the ebb and flow of excitement, with a fusion of vibrant colors and energetic brushstrokes reflecting the dynamic atmosphere of the pub. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: Scientists have discovered an unexpected correlation between the winning team score in the Heineken Cup Final and Google searches for "how to build a bunker." It turns out that as the winning team score decreases, so does the interest in bunker-building. Experts speculate that this bizarre connection may have its roots in an ancient tradition of bunker construction as a form of consolation for the losing team, causing a decrease in interest when the winning team's score is lower.. Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cybernetic art Brutalism Photorealism Scalar art Pop art
ChatGPT: Scalar art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. Scientists have discovered an unexpected correlation between the winning team score in the Heineken Cup Final and Google searches for "how to build a bunker." It turns out that as the winning team score decreases, so does the interest in bunker-building. Experts speculate that this bizarre connection may have its roots in an ancient tradition of bunker construction as a form of consolation for the losing team, causing a decrease in interest when the winning team's score is lower.
ChatGPT: Imagine a group of rugby fans celebrating the Heineken Cup Final in a crowded pub. As the winning team's score decreases, so does the number of people looking up "how to build a bunker" on their phones. Meanwhile, in the corner, a few individuals discuss the ancient tradition of building bunkers as a form of consolation for the losing team, shedding light on the unexpected correlation.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Scalar art ] and depicting this scene: Imagine a group of rugby fans celebrating the Heineken Cup Final in a crowded pub. As the winning team's score decreases, so does the number of people looking up "how to build a bunker" on their phones. Meanwhile, in the corner, a few individuals discuss the ancient tradition of building bunkers as a form of consolation for the losing team, shedding light on the unexpected correlation. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Style: Abstract impressionism Image prompt: Create an abstract, vibrant portrayal of a bustling pub filled with excited rugby fans celebrating the Heineken Cup Final. Show a dynamic scene where the fans' emotions fluctuate as the winning team's score changes. At the forefront, depict a group of exuberant fans cheering and raising their drinks in jubilation. As the winning team's score decreases, convey a subtle decrease in the number of people focused on their phones, with a noticeable decline in searches for "how to build a bunker." In the background, subtly hint at a few individuals engaged in a deep conversation about the ancient tradition of building bunkers as a form of consolation for the losing team. Let the composition capture the ebb and flow of excitement, with a fusion of vibrant colors and energetic brushstrokes reflecting the dynamic atmosphere of the pub.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Heineken Cup Final winning team score positively influenced how to build a bunker (Google searches for 'how to build a bunker'). Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Bunker Building Behavior: Heineken Cup Happiness and Hasty Hideaways

Journal of Spontaneous Hideaway Engineering

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Heineken Cup Final winning team score and Google searches for 'how to build a bunker'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Wikipedia and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.6170589 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Bunker Building Behavior: Heineken Cup Happiness and Hasty Hideaways

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our study delves into the curious correlation between the winning team's score in the Heineken Cup Final and the subsequent surge in Google searches for "how to build a bunker." Taking on this whimsical investigation, we wanted to see if there was a concrete connection or if it was all just a load of bunk. Utilizing data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, our team unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.6170589 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2022. We present our findings with a lighthearted touch, exploring the potential psychological implications and tongue-in-cheek interpretations of this peculiar pattern. Whether it's a case of fans seeking solace in fortified fortresses or simply a statistical anomaly, our research uncovers an unexpected intersection between sports triumph and doomsday preparation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Heineken Cup Final winning team score and Google searches for 'how to build a bunker'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Bunker Building Behavior: Heineken Cup Happiness and Hasty Hideaways

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our study delves into the curious correlation between the winning team's score in the Heineken Cup Final and the subsequent surge in Google searches for "how to build a bunker." Taking on this whimsical investigation, we wanted to see if there was a concrete connection or if it was all just a load of bunk. Utilizing data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, our team unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.6170589 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2022. We present our findings with a lighthearted touch, exploring the potential psychological implications and tongue-in-cheek interpretations of this peculiar pattern. Whether it's a case of fans seeking solace in fortified fortresses or simply a statistical anomaly, our research uncovers an unexpected intersection between sports triumph and doomsday preparation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

As the saying goes, "When the going gets tough, the tough get Googling 'how to build a bunker'" – at least that's the sentiment we encountered when embarking on our quirky investigation. While most scholarly endeavors hew to the beaten track, we veered off into uncharted territory by musing over the connection between the Heineken Cup Final and the peculiar predilection for bunker-building inquiries. It's not every day that you find yourself analyzing rugby scores and doomsday preparations in the same breath, but here we are, folks!

With a twinkle in our eyes, we set out to unearth the nitty-gritty of this enigmatic pattern. It's a peculiar marriage of sports jubilation and post-apocalyptic apprehension – an unlikely pairing, to be sure. But fear not, dear reader, for we aren't just diving into stats and coefficients. Our approach is as light and frothy as a freshly poured pint of Heineken, weaving together the realms of sports fandom and survivalist instincts with a healthy dose of wit.

Imagine our surprise when our exploration into rugby revelry and bunker blues turned up a correlation coefficient of 0.6170589 – talk about a scrum of statistics! And with a p-value of less than 0.01, it appears that there's more to this peculiar phenomenon than just a random ruck. Could it be that fans, in the throes of joy or despair, seek solace in the solidity of concrete fortifications? Or is this all just a statistical anomaly, a mere blip in the vast expanse of data-driven research?

Join us as we embroil ourselves in the realms of sports psychology, disaster preparedness, and the wacky world of human behavior. From the elation of victory to the agony of defeat, we'll venture into the minds of rugby enthusiasts and doomsday preppers alike, attempting to decipher this unexpected intersection between the thrill of triumph and the urge to hunker down.

So, ready your calculators and dust off your bunker blueprints – this is no ordinary academic affair. With a healthy dose of curiosity and a sprinkle of whimsy, let's unravel the mystery of Heineken Cup happiness and the hasty pursuit of hideaways!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Heineken Cup Final winning team score and Google searches for 'how to build a bunker'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Bunker Building Behavior: Heineken Cup Happiness and Hasty Hideaways

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our study delves into the curious correlation between the winning team's score in the Heineken Cup Final and the subsequent surge in Google searches for "how to build a bunker." Taking on this whimsical investigation, we wanted to see if there was a concrete connection or if it was all just a load of bunk. Utilizing data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, our team unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.6170589 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2022. We present our findings with a lighthearted touch, exploring the potential psychological implications and tongue-in-cheek interpretations of this peculiar pattern. Whether it's a case of fans seeking solace in fortified fortresses or simply a statistical anomaly, our research uncovers an unexpected intersection between sports triumph and doomsday preparation.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
As the saying goes, "When the going gets tough, the tough get Googling 'how to build a bunker'" – at least that's the sentiment we encountered when embarking on our quirky investigation. While most scholarly endeavors hew to the beaten track, we veered off into uncharted territory by musing over the connection between the Heineken Cup Final and the peculiar predilection for bunker-building inquiries. It's not every day that you find yourself analyzing rugby scores and doomsday preparations in the same breath, but here we are, folks!
With a twinkle in our eyes, we set out to unearth the nitty-gritty of this enigmatic pattern. It's a peculiar marriage of sports jubilation and post-apocalyptic apprehension – an unlikely pairing, to be sure. But fear not, dear reader, for we aren't just diving into stats and coefficients. Our approach is as light and frothy as a freshly poured pint of Heineken, weaving together the realms of sports fandom and survivalist instincts with a healthy dose of wit.
Imagine our surprise when our exploration into rugby revelry and bunker blues turned up a correlation coefficient of 0.6170589 – talk about a scrum of statistics! And with a p-value of less than 0.01, it appears that there's more to this peculiar phenomenon than just a random ruck. Could it be that fans, in the throes of joy or despair, seek solace in the solidity of concrete fortifications? Or is this all just a statistical anomaly, a mere blip in the vast expanse of data-driven research?
Join us as we embroil ourselves in the realms of sports psychology, disaster preparedness, and the wacky world of human behavior. From the elation of victory to the agony of defeat, we'll venture into the minds of rugby enthusiasts and doomsday preppers alike, attempting to decipher this unexpected intersection between the thrill of triumph and the urge to hunker down.
So, ready your calculators and dust off your bunker blueprints – this is no ordinary academic affair. With a healthy dose of curiosity and a sprinkle of whimsy, let's unravel the mystery of Heineken Cup happiness and the hasty pursuit of hideaways!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al.," the authors find that the Heineken Cup Final has been a source of joy and celebration for rugby enthusiasts. The victorious roar of the crowd, the jubilant embraces, and the triumphant chants weave a tapestry of elation and ecstasy for the winning team and its fervent supporters. However, amidst the revelry, a curious uptick in the queries for "how to build a bunker" enters the spotlight, casting a shadow of bemusement over the otherwise blissful scene.

As we shift our focus to a more tongue-in-cheek perspective, let's not overlook the potential behavioral undercurrents at play. In "Doe and Jones," the authors delve into the psychology of dissonance between sports triumph and existential concerns. It's no secret that amidst the joy of victory, a tinge of apprehension about what comes next may linger in the minds of fans. Could this undercurrent of post-triumph existential angst be the driving force behind the sudden surge in bunker-related inquiries following the Heineken Cup Final? It's a peculiar juxtaposition, to say the least.

Now, let's unshackle ourselves from the confines of academia for a moment and peruse some sources that may be tangentially related to our whimsical investigation. In "How to Survive the End of the World as We Know It" by James Wesley Rawles, the author offers a comprehensive guide to preparing for apocalyptic scenarios, although we suspect the Heineken Cup Final is not on the list of catalysts for disaster readiness. Similarly, in the fictional realm, the dystopian themes of "The Road" by Cormac McCarthy and "Station Eleven" by Emily St. John Mandel could serve as metaphorical mirrors to our unexpected correlation.

Moving further into the realm of popular social media, I stumbled upon a tweet from a self-proclaimed rugby aficionado, who humorously mused, "After that nail-biting Heineken Cup Final, I'm one step closer to building a bunker and never watching a rugby match again– or at least until next season." While an anecdotal comment, it offers an amusing peek into the potential psychological impact of sporting events on bunker-building proclivities.

In the spirit of academic rigor and a touch of whimsy, we've uncovered a curious thread linking the exuberance of sports triumph with the quixotic quest for subterranean sanctuaries. As we journey deeper into the realms of human behavior and unexpected correlations, let's not forget to temper our statistical analyses with a healthy dose of humor and curiosity. After all, sometimes the most unexpected juxtapositions yield the quirkiest insights.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Heineken Cup Final winning team score and Google searches for 'how to build a bunker'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Bunker Building Behavior: Heineken Cup Happiness and Hasty Hideaways

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our study delves into the curious correlation between the winning team's score in the Heineken Cup Final and the subsequent surge in Google searches for "how to build a bunker." Taking on this whimsical investigation, we wanted to see if there was a concrete connection or if it was all just a load of bunk. Utilizing data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, our team unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.6170589 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2022. We present our findings with a lighthearted touch, exploring the potential psychological implications and tongue-in-cheek interpretations of this peculiar pattern. Whether it's a case of fans seeking solace in fortified fortresses or simply a statistical anomaly, our research uncovers an unexpected intersection between sports triumph and doomsday preparation.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
As the saying goes, "When the going gets tough, the tough get Googling 'how to build a bunker'" – at least that's the sentiment we encountered when embarking on our quirky investigation. While most scholarly endeavors hew to the beaten track, we veered off into uncharted territory by musing over the connection between the Heineken Cup Final and the peculiar predilection for bunker-building inquiries. It's not every day that you find yourself analyzing rugby scores and doomsday preparations in the same breath, but here we are, folks!
With a twinkle in our eyes, we set out to unearth the nitty-gritty of this enigmatic pattern. It's a peculiar marriage of sports jubilation and post-apocalyptic apprehension – an unlikely pairing, to be sure. But fear not, dear reader, for we aren't just diving into stats and coefficients. Our approach is as light and frothy as a freshly poured pint of Heineken, weaving together the realms of sports fandom and survivalist instincts with a healthy dose of wit.
Imagine our surprise when our exploration into rugby revelry and bunker blues turned up a correlation coefficient of 0.6170589 – talk about a scrum of statistics! And with a p-value of less than 0.01, it appears that there's more to this peculiar phenomenon than just a random ruck. Could it be that fans, in the throes of joy or despair, seek solace in the solidity of concrete fortifications? Or is this all just a statistical anomaly, a mere blip in the vast expanse of data-driven research?
Join us as we embroil ourselves in the realms of sports psychology, disaster preparedness, and the wacky world of human behavior. From the elation of victory to the agony of defeat, we'll venture into the minds of rugby enthusiasts and doomsday preppers alike, attempting to decipher this unexpected intersection between the thrill of triumph and the urge to hunker down.
So, ready your calculators and dust off your bunker blueprints – this is no ordinary academic affair. With a healthy dose of curiosity and a sprinkle of whimsy, let's unravel the mystery of Heineken Cup happiness and the hasty pursuit of hideaways!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

METHODOLOGY

Now, let's delve into the nitty-gritty of how we unearthed this peculiar correlation between the Heineken Cup Final winning team's score and the subsequent surge in Google searches for "how to build a bunker." Our approach involved a smorgasbord of data collection and analysis, akin to a scrum on the rugby field, albeit with fewer bruises.

Data Collection:
To embark on this whimsical journey, we ventured into the expansive realm of the internet, casting our nets far and wide in search of relevant information. Armed with our trusty laptops and a bottomless reserve of caffeine, we scoured the depths of Wikipedia and dipped our toes into the waves of Google Trends. We reveled in the treasure trove of rugby-related data and the unexpected quirks of online search behavior. After sifting through countless digital tidbits, we emerged with a juicy dataset spanning the years 2004 to 2022, capturing the ebbs and flows of Heineken Cup Finals and the curious upticks in bunker-building curiosity.

Data Analysis:
With our virtual spoils in hand, we set out to crunch the numbers and make sense of this seemingly far-fetched connection. Utilizing statistical software that was more reliable than a rock-solid bunker foundation, we computed the correlation coefficient between the winning team's score in the Heineken Cup Final and the volume of Google searches for "how to build a bunker." As we waded through the sea of data points, we marveled at the ebb and flow of sports elation and bunker blues, all while keeping our spirits high with the occasional rugby pun.

Interpretation:
Once the statistical dust settled, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.6170589, giving us a solid anchor in the sea of conjecture. With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings stood as tall and sturdy as a well-fortified bunker. However, as with any peculiar discovery, we approached our results with a healthy dose of skepticism, aware that correlation does not necessarily imply causation. But in the spirit of scholarly wit and whimsy, we explored potential psychological implications and conjured up tongue-in-cheek interpretations of this curious pattern, adding a splash of humor to this otherwise serious pursuit of knowledge.

In essence, our methodology was a whirlwind of internet sleuthing, statistical sorcery, and a pinch of scholarly jest. It was a journey that traversed the terrains of rugby fandom and doomsday preparations in search of an unexpected intersection between sports triumph and the urge to hunker down. And with a lighthearted touch, we present our methodology as the sturdy bridge between Heineken Cup happiness and the hasty pursuit of hideaways.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Heineken Cup Final winning team score and Google searches for 'how to build a bunker'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.6170589, r-squared of 0.3807617, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Bunker Building Behavior: Heineken Cup Happiness and Hasty Hideaways

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our study delves into the curious correlation between the winning team's score in the Heineken Cup Final and the subsequent surge in Google searches for "how to build a bunker." Taking on this whimsical investigation, we wanted to see if there was a concrete connection or if it was all just a load of bunk. Utilizing data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, our team unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.6170589 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2022. We present our findings with a lighthearted touch, exploring the potential psychological implications and tongue-in-cheek interpretations of this peculiar pattern. Whether it's a case of fans seeking solace in fortified fortresses or simply a statistical anomaly, our research uncovers an unexpected intersection between sports triumph and doomsday preparation.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
As the saying goes, "When the going gets tough, the tough get Googling 'how to build a bunker'" – at least that's the sentiment we encountered when embarking on our quirky investigation. While most scholarly endeavors hew to the beaten track, we veered off into uncharted territory by musing over the connection between the Heineken Cup Final and the peculiar predilection for bunker-building inquiries. It's not every day that you find yourself analyzing rugby scores and doomsday preparations in the same breath, but here we are, folks!
With a twinkle in our eyes, we set out to unearth the nitty-gritty of this enigmatic pattern. It's a peculiar marriage of sports jubilation and post-apocalyptic apprehension – an unlikely pairing, to be sure. But fear not, dear reader, for we aren't just diving into stats and coefficients. Our approach is as light and frothy as a freshly poured pint of Heineken, weaving together the realms of sports fandom and survivalist instincts with a healthy dose of wit.
Imagine our surprise when our exploration into rugby revelry and bunker blues turned up a correlation coefficient of 0.6170589 – talk about a scrum of statistics! And with a p-value of less than 0.01, it appears that there's more to this peculiar phenomenon than just a random ruck. Could it be that fans, in the throes of joy or despair, seek solace in the solidity of concrete fortifications? Or is this all just a statistical anomaly, a mere blip in the vast expanse of data-driven research?
Join us as we embroil ourselves in the realms of sports psychology, disaster preparedness, and the wacky world of human behavior. From the elation of victory to the agony of defeat, we'll venture into the minds of rugby enthusiasts and doomsday preppers alike, attempting to decipher this unexpected intersection between the thrill of triumph and the urge to hunker down.
So, ready your calculators and dust off your bunker blueprints – this is no ordinary academic affair. With a healthy dose of curiosity and a sprinkle of whimsy, let's unravel the mystery of Heineken Cup happiness and the hasty pursuit of hideaways!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our offbeat exploration into the connection between the Heineken Cup Final winning team score and Google searches for "how to build a bunker" have yielded some intriguing findings. We hope you're sitting down for this, because it turns out there's more to this peculiar pattern than meets the eye – or the scrum, for that matter!

Our analysis uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.6170589, indicating a moderately strong relationship between the two variables. This isn't just a fly-by-night correlation; it's a statistically significant one, with an r-squared value of 0.3807617 and a p-value of less than 0.01. If there ever was a time to take notice of a correlation, this would be it!

To put the magnitude of this discovery into perspective, Fig. 1 illustrates a scatterplot showcasing the robust relationship between Heineken Cup Final winning team scores and the subsequent surge in Google searches for "how to build a bunker." It's a visual feast for the eyes, highlighting the undeniable trend that has emerged from our unorthodox investigation.

Now, we won't go so far as to proclaim causation in this merry mix of rugby revelry and bunker blues, but there's a distinct pattern that tickles the fancy of data enthusiasts and sports aficionados alike. Whether it's the joyous exuberance of victory prompting fans to seek shelter from the storms of life, or the heart-wrenching defeats driving them to prepare for the worst, our research has peeled back the layers of this seemingly absurd yet undeniably curious phenomenon.

So there you have it, dear reader. From scrum to shelter, ruck to refuge, our findings lend weight to the notion that sports euphoria and the primal urge for protection intersect in unexpected ways. It's a peculiar pairing, to be sure, but one that adds a dash of whimsy and wonder to the world of academic inquiry. And with that, let's raise a glass of good cheer to the surprising confluence of Heineken Cup happiness and the hasty pursuit of hideaways!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Heineken Cup Final winning team score and Google searches for 'how to build a bunker'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Bunker Building Behavior: Heineken Cup Happiness and Hasty Hideaways

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our study delves into the curious correlation between the winning team's score in the Heineken Cup Final and the subsequent surge in Google searches for "how to build a bunker." Taking on this whimsical investigation, we wanted to see if there was a concrete connection or if it was all just a load of bunk. Utilizing data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, our team unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.6170589 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2022. We present our findings with a lighthearted touch, exploring the potential psychological implications and tongue-in-cheek interpretations of this peculiar pattern. Whether it's a case of fans seeking solace in fortified fortresses or simply a statistical anomaly, our research uncovers an unexpected intersection between sports triumph and doomsday preparation.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find that the Heineken Cup Final has been a source of joy and celebration for rugby enthusiasts. The victorious roar of the crowd, the jubilant embraces, and the triumphant chants weave a tapestry of elation and ecstasy for the winning team and its fervent supporters. However, amidst the revelry, a curious uptick in the queries for "how to build a bunker" enters the spotlight, casting a shadow of bemusement over the otherwise blissful scene.
As we shift our focus to a more tongue-in-cheek perspective, let's not overlook the potential behavioral undercurrents at play. In "Doe and Jones," the authors delve into the psychology of dissonance between sports triumph and existential concerns. It's no secret that amidst the joy of victory, a tinge of apprehension about what comes next may linger in the minds of fans. Could this undercurrent of post-triumph existential angst be the driving force behind the sudden surge in bunker-related inquiries following the Heineken Cup Final? It's a peculiar juxtaposition, to say the least.
Now, let's unshackle ourselves from the confines of academia for a moment and peruse some sources that may be tangentially related to our whimsical investigation. In "How to Survive the End of the World as We Know It" by James Wesley Rawles, the author offers a comprehensive guide to preparing for apocalyptic scenarios, although we suspect the Heineken Cup Final is not on the list of catalysts for disaster readiness. Similarly, in the fictional realm, the dystopian themes of "The Road" by Cormac McCarthy and "Station Eleven" by Emily St. John Mandel could serve as metaphorical mirrors to our unexpected correlation.
Moving further into the realm of popular social media, I stumbled upon a tweet from a self-proclaimed rugby aficionado, who humorously mused, "After that nail-biting Heineken Cup Final, I'm one step closer to building a bunker and never watching a rugby match again– or at least until next season." While an anecdotal comment, it offers an amusing peek into the potential psychological impact of sporting events on bunker-building proclivities.
In the spirit of academic rigor and a touch of whimsy, we've uncovered a curious thread linking the exuberance of sports triumph with the quixotic quest for subterranean sanctuaries. As we journey deeper into the realms of human behavior and unexpected correlations, let's not forget to temper our statistical analyses with a healthy dose of humor and curiosity. After all, sometimes the most unexpected juxtapositions yield the quirkiest insights.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our offbeat exploration into the connection between the Heineken Cup Final winning team score and Google searches for "how to build a bunker" have yielded some intriguing findings. We hope you're sitting down for this, because it turns out there's more to this peculiar pattern than meets the eye – or the scrum, for that matter!
Our analysis uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.6170589, indicating a moderately strong relationship between the two variables. This isn't just a fly-by-night correlation; it's a statistically significant one, with an r-squared value of 0.3807617 and a p-value of less than 0.01. If there ever was a time to take notice of a correlation, this would be it!
To put the magnitude of this discovery into perspective, Fig. 1 illustrates a scatterplot showcasing the robust relationship between Heineken Cup Final winning team scores and the subsequent surge in Google searches for "how to build a bunker." It's a visual feast for the eyes, highlighting the undeniable trend that has emerged from our unorthodox investigation.
Now, we won't go so far as to proclaim causation in this merry mix of rugby revelry and bunker blues, but there's a distinct pattern that tickles the fancy of data enthusiasts and sports aficionados alike. Whether it's the joyous exuberance of victory prompting fans to seek shelter from the storms of life, or the heart-wrenching defeats driving them to prepare for the worst, our research has peeled back the layers of this seemingly absurd yet undeniably curious phenomenon.
So there you have it, dear reader. From scrum to shelter, ruck to refuge, our findings lend weight to the notion that sports euphoria and the primal urge for protection intersect in unexpected ways. It's a peculiar pairing, to be sure, but one that adds a dash of whimsy and wonder to the world of academic inquiry. And with that, let's raise a glass of good cheer to the surprising confluence of Heineken Cup happiness and the hasty pursuit of hideaways!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:


[[DISCUSSION]]

In what can only be described as a scrum of surprising results, our study has uncovered a statistically significant correlation between the Heineken Cup Final winning team score and the subsequent surge in Google searches for "how to build a bunker." If you're a rugby enthusiast, you might be tempted to call this a game-changer – pun absolutely intended!

Now, let's circle back to some of the more whimsical elements from our literature review. Smith et al. illuminated the joy and celebration sparked by the Heineken Cup Final, but we took a light-hearted detour to explore the quirkier aftermath of this euphoria. It appears that amidst the triumphant chants and embraces, a peculiar uptick in bunker-related queries emerges as a sort of yin to the yang of jubilation. Our results have lent support to this light-hearted observation, unearthing an unexpected correlation that beckons us to don our thinking caps and perhaps a hard hat or two.

Further echoing the sentiment of Doe and Jones, who delved into the potential dissonance between sporting triumph and existential concerns, we've come face to face with a curious juxtaposition. It's as if the elation of victory is met with an undercurrent of post-triumph apprehension, prompting fans to turn to the digital cosmos in search of fortification of a different sort.

In the spirit of academic rigor, however, we must exercise caution in interpreting these findings. While we have identified a robust relationship between the winning team's score and bunker-related searches, we cannot infer causation. It's one thing to raise a glass of celebratory ale in the wake of victory; it's a whole other ball game to claim that a high-scoring match prompts fans to break ground on their own subterranean sanctuaries.

Yet, in the delightful chaos of statistics and human behavior, our findings beckon us to embrace this peculiar pairing with open arms. This unexpected intersection of sports euphoria and the primal urge for protection adds a whimsical touch to the otherwise serious world of academic inquiry. So, whether you're a rugby fan seeking refuge in a bunker after a heart-stopping match or simply a data enthusiast reveling in this quirky confluence, let's raise a glass to the serendipitous discoveries that captivate our curious minds. Cheers to the merry mix of Heineken Cup happiness and the hasty pursuit of hideaways – it's a peculiar pairing, indeed!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Heineken Cup Final winning team score and Google searches for 'how to build a bunker'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Bunker Building Behavior: Heineken Cup Happiness and Hasty Hideaways

[[ABSTRACT]]
Our study delves into the curious correlation between the winning team's score in the Heineken Cup Final and the subsequent surge in Google searches for "how to build a bunker." Taking on this whimsical investigation, we wanted to see if there was a concrete connection or if it was all just a load of bunk. Utilizing data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, our team unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.6170589 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2022. We present our findings with a lighthearted touch, exploring the potential psychological implications and tongue-in-cheek interpretations of this peculiar pattern. Whether it's a case of fans seeking solace in fortified fortresses or simply a statistical anomaly, our research uncovers an unexpected intersection between sports triumph and doomsday preparation.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
As the saying goes, "When the going gets tough, the tough get Googling 'how to build a bunker'" – at least that's the sentiment we encountered when embarking on our quirky investigation. While most scholarly endeavors hew to the beaten track, we veered off into uncharted territory by musing over the connection between the Heineken Cup Final and the peculiar predilection for bunker-building inquiries. It's not every day that you find yourself analyzing rugby scores and doomsday preparations in the same breath, but here we are, folks!
With a twinkle in our eyes, we set out to unearth the nitty-gritty of this enigmatic pattern. It's a peculiar marriage of sports jubilation and post-apocalyptic apprehension – an unlikely pairing, to be sure. But fear not, dear reader, for we aren't just diving into stats and coefficients. Our approach is as light and frothy as a freshly poured pint of Heineken, weaving together the realms of sports fandom and survivalist instincts with a healthy dose of wit.
Imagine our surprise when our exploration into rugby revelry and bunker blues turned up a correlation coefficient of 0.6170589 – talk about a scrum of statistics! And with a p-value of less than 0.01, it appears that there's more to this peculiar phenomenon than just a random ruck. Could it be that fans, in the throes of joy or despair, seek solace in the solidity of concrete fortifications? Or is this all just a statistical anomaly, a mere blip in the vast expanse of data-driven research?
Join us as we embroil ourselves in the realms of sports psychology, disaster preparedness, and the wacky world of human behavior. From the elation of victory to the agony of defeat, we'll venture into the minds of rugby enthusiasts and doomsday preppers alike, attempting to decipher this unexpected intersection between the thrill of triumph and the urge to hunker down.
So, ready your calculators and dust off your bunker blueprints – this is no ordinary academic affair. With a healthy dose of curiosity and a sprinkle of whimsy, let's unravel the mystery of Heineken Cup happiness and the hasty pursuit of hideaways!

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our offbeat exploration into the connection between the Heineken Cup Final winning team score and Google searches for "how to build a bunker" have yielded some intriguing findings. We hope you're sitting down for this, because it turns out there's more to this peculiar pattern than meets the eye – or the scrum, for that matter!
Our analysis uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.6170589, indicating a moderately strong relationship between the two variables. This isn't just a fly-by-night correlation; it's a statistically significant one, with an r-squared value of 0.3807617 and a p-value of less than 0.01. If there ever was a time to take notice of a correlation, this would be it!
To put the magnitude of this discovery into perspective, Fig. 1 illustrates a scatterplot showcasing the robust relationship between Heineken Cup Final winning team scores and the subsequent surge in Google searches for "how to build a bunker." It's a visual feast for the eyes, highlighting the undeniable trend that has emerged from our unorthodox investigation.
Now, we won't go so far as to proclaim causation in this merry mix of rugby revelry and bunker blues, but there's a distinct pattern that tickles the fancy of data enthusiasts and sports aficionados alike. Whether it's the joyous exuberance of victory prompting fans to seek shelter from the storms of life, or the heart-wrenching defeats driving them to prepare for the worst, our research has peeled back the layers of this seemingly absurd yet undeniably curious phenomenon.
So there you have it, dear reader. From scrum to shelter, ruck to refuge, our findings lend weight to the notion that sports euphoria and the primal urge for protection intersect in unexpected ways. It's a peculiar pairing, to be sure, but one that adds a dash of whimsy and wonder to the world of academic inquiry. And with that, let's raise a glass of good cheer to the surprising confluence of Heineken Cup happiness and the hasty pursuit of hideaways!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

CONCLUSION

As we bid adieu to our merry expedition into the quirky realm of Heineken Cup happiness and hasty hideaways, we're left with a pot of glittering gold at the end of the rugby rainbow. Our findings have not only left us scratching our heads but also chuckling merrily at the whimsical world of human behavior.

From the jubilant highs of victory to the desolate lows of defeat, it seems that rugby fans are not just riding the emotional rollercoaster but also Googling their way to bunker blueprints. While we hesitate to dub this as a case of "scrum and shelter," the evidence suggests a tantalizing correlation, leaving us pondering the profound confluence of sports fervor and survival instincts.

With our correlation coefficient of 0.6170589 in tow, we're tempted to declare that rugby scores and bunker ambitions are partners in crime – the Robin to Batman, the salt to pepper, the peanut butter to jelly. The scatterplot, with its unmistakable trajectory, only adds credence to this peculiar pairing, inviting a wry smile of bemusement from even the most stoic of researchers.

But alas, as much as we'd relish the opportunity to continue plumbing the depths of this offbeat connection, we must, regrettably, bid farewell to our investigative escapade. For, in the immortal words of the bard, "All good things must come to an end." On that note, we assert confidently, and perhaps with a lingering chuckle, that no further research is needed in this area. As the final whistle blows, let's raise a glass to the delightful fusion of sports revelry and the quest for fortification, in all its pun-tastic glory!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Bunker Building Behavior: Heineken Cup Happiness and Hasty Hideaways. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Spontaneous Hideaway Engineering


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Bunker Building Behavior: Heineken Cup Happiness and Hasty Hideaways. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Vivacious Vault Ventures Association


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Bunker Building Behavior: Heineken Cup Happiness and Hasty Hideaways with an abstract of Our study delves into the curious correlation between the winning team's score in the Heineken Cup Final and the subsequent surge in Google searches for "how to build a bunker." Taking on this whimsical investigation, we wanted to see if there was a concrete connection or if it was all just a load of bunk. Utilizing data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, our team unearthed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.6170589 and a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2022. We present our findings with a lighthearted touch, exploring the potential psychological implications and tongue-in-cheek interpretations of this peculiar pattern. Whether it's a case of fans seeking solace in fortified fortresses or simply a statistical anomaly, our research uncovers an unexpected intersection between sports triumph and doomsday preparation.

ChatGPT:

Heineken Cup, bunker building, bunker construction, sport psychology, sports fandom, Google search trends, sports impact, fan behavior, doomsday preparation, Heineken Cup Final, statistical correlation, sports triumph, psychological implications

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Heineken Cup Final winning team score
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Heineken Cup Final winning team score

Google searches for 'how to build a bunker'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'how to build a bunker' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'how to build a bunker'

Correlation r = 0.6170589 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.3807617 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 38.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'how to build a bunker') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Heineken Cup Final winning team score) over the 19 years from 2004 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0049. 0.0048863728616625660000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.62 in 0.49% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 205 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.23, 0.84 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Heineken Cup Final winning team score (Score)27182325161921334216232421281520312224
Google searches for 'how to build a bunker' (Rel. search volume)45.525.333321.416723.2537.333331.7535.083344.560.416742.833332.916733.583336.7542.916731.416727.083345.166737.583354




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([27,18,23,25,16,19,21,33,42,16,23,24,21,28,15,20,31,22,24,])
array_2 = np.array([45.5,25.3333,21.4167,23.25,37.3333,31.75,35.0833,44.5,60.4167,42.8333,32.9167,33.5833,36.75,42.9167,31.4167,27.0833,45.1667,37.5833,54,])
array_1_name = "Heineken Cup Final winning team score"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'how to build a bunker'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're a rater extraordinaire!


Correlation ID: 1096 · Black Variable ID: 387 · Red Variable ID: 1377
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0