about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,647 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Heineken Cup Final winning team score and the second variable is The number of computer network support specialists in Virginia.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the winning team's score decreased, fans experienced less joy, leading to a statewide dip in overall happiness levels. This led to a decrease in the demand for computer network support specialists as people were too sad to even turn on their computers, let alone seek technical help. Looks like the real MVPs were the network support specialists, keeping Virginia afloat one tech issue at a time!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image of a sports bar with a distinct Brutalist architectural style. In the center, depict a group of disappointed fans wearing the winning team's merchandise as they watch the Heineken Cup Final. Behind them, illustrate a large display showing the winning team's score decreasing. Show the fans gradually losing enthusiasm, leading to fewer high-fives and a decrease in the hand injury incidents. Finally, indicate a corresponding decline in the demand for computer network support specialists in Virginia through subtle visual cues such as empty chairs at a computer support desk. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Heineken Cup Final winning team score and The number of computer network support specialists in Virginia. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Concept art Oragami Cutsy art illustration Brutalism Macabre
ChatGPT: Brutalism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Heineken Cup Final winning team score and The number of computer network support specialists in Virginia, in the following situation: The decrease in Heineken Cup Final winning team score led to a decrease in confidence among fans, resulting in a decrease in high-fives, causing a decline in hand injuries and thus a decreased demand for computer network support specialists in Virginia due to less typing.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a sports bar in Virginia, the Heineken Cup Final winning team's score decreases, causing fans to lose confidence and high-five less. As a result, fewer hand injuries occur, leading to a decrease in the demand for computer network support specialists in Virginia who would typically assist with typing-related injuries.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Brutalism ] and depicting this scene: In a sports bar in Virginia, the Heineken Cup Final winning team's score decreases, causing fans to lose confidence and high-five less. As a result, fewer hand injuries occur, leading to a decrease in the demand for computer network support specialists in Virginia who would typically assist with typing-related injuries. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image of a sports bar with a distinct Brutalist architectural style. In the center, depict a group of disappointed fans wearing the winning team's merchandise as they watch the Heineken Cup Final. Behind them, illustrate a large display showing the winning team's score decreasing. Show the fans gradually losing enthusiasm, leading to fewer high-fives and a decrease in the hand injury incidents. Finally, indicate a corresponding decline in the demand for computer network support specialists in Virginia through subtle visual cues such as empty chairs at a computer support desk.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Heineken Cup Final winning team score caused The number of computer network support specialists in Virginia to decrease. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Scoring More, Networking Better: Heineken Cup Victory and Virginia's IT Quandary

The Journal of Sports Analytics and Technology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Heineken Cup Final winning team score and The number of computer network support specialists in Virginia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from Wikipedia and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8674040 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Scoring More, Networking Better: Heineken Cup Victory and Virginia's IT Quandary

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research investigates the peculiar relationship between the winning team score in the Heineken Cup Final and the number of computer network support specialists in Virginia. Using data from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, a correlation coefficient of 0.8674040 with p < 0.01 was observed over the years 2012 to 2022, presenting a rather surprising associative link between the two seemingly disparate entities. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we reveal implications that transcend mere coincidence, raising questions about the hidden interplay of sports glory and information technology expertise. This study offers an intriguing lens through which to view the enigmatic dance of sporting achievement and technological infrastructure, and invites readers to ponder the delightful quirks of the interconnected world we inhabit.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Heineken Cup Final winning team score and The number of computer network support specialists in Virginia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Scoring More, Networking Better: Heineken Cup Victory and Virginia's IT Quandary

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research investigates the peculiar relationship between the winning team score in the Heineken Cup Final and the number of computer network support specialists in Virginia. Using data from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, a correlation coefficient of 0.8674040 with p < 0.01 was observed over the years 2012 to 2022, presenting a rather surprising associative link between the two seemingly disparate entities. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we reveal implications that transcend mere coincidence, raising questions about the hidden interplay of sports glory and information technology expertise. This study offers an intriguing lens through which to view the enigmatic dance of sporting achievement and technological infrastructure, and invites readers to ponder the delightful quirks of the interconnected world we inhabit.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The Heineken Cup Final has long been regarded as a pinnacle of European rugby achievement, drawing fervent fans and generating intense rivalries among teams. It stands as a testament to the competitive spirit and the sheer determination of its participants. Similarly, the field of information technology in Virginia has witnessed a remarkable surge in demand for computer network support specialists, in consonance with the relentless march of digitization in the modern world. These seemingly unrelated domains have been brought together in this research, as we delve into the intriguing link between the victorious scores in the Heineken Cup Final and the workforce landscape of Virginia's IT sector.

The choice of the Heineken Cup Final as the focal point of this research is not without its charm. With its ebbs and flows, unexpected upsets, and unforgettable triumphs, the tournament provides a rich tapestry of sporting narratives, ripe for exploration. Meanwhile, the information technology realm in Virginia presents its own complexities, with the ever-evolving nature of technological advancements and the consequential demand for specialized support. By aligning these distinct spheres, we embark on a quest to unravel the enigmatic correlation between sporting glory and the intricate web of computer network support in the state of Virginia.

The title of this paper, "Scoring More, Networking Better: Heineken Cup Victory and Virginia's IT Quandary," offers a nod to this intriguing interplay, encapsulating the overarching theme of exploring unexpected connections and fortuitous intersections. The abstract nature of these two seemingly unrelated phenomena invites an element of surprise, much like stumbling upon an unsuspected correlation in a complex dataset. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8674040 and a p-value of less than 0.01, our initial findings have piqued our curiosity and beckoned us to peer deeper into this puzzle.

As we embark on this scholarly expedition, we do so with a mixture of inquisitiveness and amusement, recognizing the delightful peculiarity of our chosen inquiry. This study safeguards against the temptation to view the world solely through a utilitarian lens, reminding us of the unexpected threads that weave through the fabric of human pursuits, whether on the field of play or within the intricate circuits of technology. By unveiling the unexpected connectivity of Heineken Cup triumphs and Virginia's IT ecosystem, we hope to invite our readers to revel in the whimsical serendipity that often underlies the most unlikely associations.

In the subsequent sections, we undertake a methodical examination of the empirical data, while fostering a sense of wonder at the improbable kinship we have unearthed. Through this lens, we entreat the reader to join us in our investigation of this unexpected relationship between the thrill of victory and the intricacies of information technology, as we navigate the hitherto unexplored corridors of these seemingly disparate domains.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Heineken Cup Final winning team score and The number of computer network support specialists in Virginia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Scoring More, Networking Better: Heineken Cup Victory and Virginia's IT Quandary

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research investigates the peculiar relationship between the winning team score in the Heineken Cup Final and the number of computer network support specialists in Virginia. Using data from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, a correlation coefficient of 0.8674040 with p < 0.01 was observed over the years 2012 to 2022, presenting a rather surprising associative link between the two seemingly disparate entities. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we reveal implications that transcend mere coincidence, raising questions about the hidden interplay of sports glory and information technology expertise. This study offers an intriguing lens through which to view the enigmatic dance of sporting achievement and technological infrastructure, and invites readers to ponder the delightful quirks of the interconnected world we inhabit.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The Heineken Cup Final has long been regarded as a pinnacle of European rugby achievement, drawing fervent fans and generating intense rivalries among teams. It stands as a testament to the competitive spirit and the sheer determination of its participants. Similarly, the field of information technology in Virginia has witnessed a remarkable surge in demand for computer network support specialists, in consonance with the relentless march of digitization in the modern world. These seemingly unrelated domains have been brought together in this research, as we delve into the intriguing link between the victorious scores in the Heineken Cup Final and the workforce landscape of Virginia's IT sector.
The choice of the Heineken Cup Final as the focal point of this research is not without its charm. With its ebbs and flows, unexpected upsets, and unforgettable triumphs, the tournament provides a rich tapestry of sporting narratives, ripe for exploration. Meanwhile, the information technology realm in Virginia presents its own complexities, with the ever-evolving nature of technological advancements and the consequential demand for specialized support. By aligning these distinct spheres, we embark on a quest to unravel the enigmatic correlation between sporting glory and the intricate web of computer network support in the state of Virginia.
The title of this paper, "Scoring More, Networking Better: Heineken Cup Victory and Virginia's IT Quandary," offers a nod to this intriguing interplay, encapsulating the overarching theme of exploring unexpected connections and fortuitous intersections. The abstract nature of these two seemingly unrelated phenomena invites an element of surprise, much like stumbling upon an unsuspected correlation in a complex dataset. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8674040 and a p-value of less than 0.01, our initial findings have piqued our curiosity and beckoned us to peer deeper into this puzzle.
As we embark on this scholarly expedition, we do so with a mixture of inquisitiveness and amusement, recognizing the delightful peculiarity of our chosen inquiry. This study safeguards against the temptation to view the world solely through a utilitarian lens, reminding us of the unexpected threads that weave through the fabric of human pursuits, whether on the field of play or within the intricate circuits of technology. By unveiling the unexpected connectivity of Heineken Cup triumphs and Virginia's IT ecosystem, we hope to invite our readers to revel in the whimsical serendipity that often underlies the most unlikely associations.
In the subsequent sections, we undertake a methodical examination of the empirical data, while fostering a sense of wonder at the improbable kinship we have unearthed. Through this lens, we entreat the reader to join us in our investigation of this unexpected relationship between the thrill of victory and the intricacies of information technology, as we navigate the hitherto unexplored corridors of these seemingly disparate domains.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The authors find a notable dearth of literature explicitly examining the intersection of Heineken Cup Final winning team scores and the number of computer network support specialists in Virginia. However, the tangential exploration of sports-related economic impacts and the influence of technological advancements on labor markets offers a glimpse into the broader context of our research inquiry. Smith et al. (2015) shed light on the economic ripple effects of major sports events, albeit not specifically focused on rugby competitions or the IT sector. Doe (2017) delves into the changing landscape of technological professions, providing insights into the evolving demands for specialized technical expertise. Furthermore, Jones (2019) discusses the intricate relationship between sports fandom and digital engagement, hinting at the multifaceted nature of our interconnected world.

Expanding beyond the realm of academic treatises, works such as "Moneyball: The Art of Winning an Unfair Game" by Michael Lewis and "The Big Short: Inside the Doomsday Machine" by Michael Lewis, while not directly addressing our research subject, offer engaging narratives of unconventional correlations and unpredicted outcomes in sports and financial domains. The aptly titled "The IT Crowd" by Philbin and Linehan, a work of fiction portraying the comedic escapades of an IT department, presents a lighthearted exploration of technological support dynamics, albeit in a vastly different context.

Moreover, the popular internet meme "Distracted Boyfriend" serves as an amusing reference to the unexpected allure of alternative pursuits, reflecting the whimsical nature of the correlations we seek to uncover. The meme, with its humorous take on divided attention and unforeseen attractions, aligns with the underlying spirit of our investigation into the curious interplay of rugby triumphs and IT labor dynamics.

In synthesizing these eclectic strands of literature and popular culture, our research strives to infuse a sense of curiosity and amusement into the discernment of intriguing connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena. With a touch of levity and an acknowledgment of the serendipitous aspects of scholarly inquiry, we embark on this analytical journey to unearth the unexpected rapport between Heineken Cup triumphs and the intricate tapestry of Virginia's IT workforce landscape.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Heineken Cup Final winning team score and The number of computer network support specialists in Virginia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2012 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Scoring More, Networking Better: Heineken Cup Victory and Virginia's IT Quandary

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research investigates the peculiar relationship between the winning team score in the Heineken Cup Final and the number of computer network support specialists in Virginia. Using data from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, a correlation coefficient of 0.8674040 with p < 0.01 was observed over the years 2012 to 2022, presenting a rather surprising associative link between the two seemingly disparate entities. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we reveal implications that transcend mere coincidence, raising questions about the hidden interplay of sports glory and information technology expertise. This study offers an intriguing lens through which to view the enigmatic dance of sporting achievement and technological infrastructure, and invites readers to ponder the delightful quirks of the interconnected world we inhabit.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The Heineken Cup Final has long been regarded as a pinnacle of European rugby achievement, drawing fervent fans and generating intense rivalries among teams. It stands as a testament to the competitive spirit and the sheer determination of its participants. Similarly, the field of information technology in Virginia has witnessed a remarkable surge in demand for computer network support specialists, in consonance with the relentless march of digitization in the modern world. These seemingly unrelated domains have been brought together in this research, as we delve into the intriguing link between the victorious scores in the Heineken Cup Final and the workforce landscape of Virginia's IT sector.
The choice of the Heineken Cup Final as the focal point of this research is not without its charm. With its ebbs and flows, unexpected upsets, and unforgettable triumphs, the tournament provides a rich tapestry of sporting narratives, ripe for exploration. Meanwhile, the information technology realm in Virginia presents its own complexities, with the ever-evolving nature of technological advancements and the consequential demand for specialized support. By aligning these distinct spheres, we embark on a quest to unravel the enigmatic correlation between sporting glory and the intricate web of computer network support in the state of Virginia.
The title of this paper, "Scoring More, Networking Better: Heineken Cup Victory and Virginia's IT Quandary," offers a nod to this intriguing interplay, encapsulating the overarching theme of exploring unexpected connections and fortuitous intersections. The abstract nature of these two seemingly unrelated phenomena invites an element of surprise, much like stumbling upon an unsuspected correlation in a complex dataset. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8674040 and a p-value of less than 0.01, our initial findings have piqued our curiosity and beckoned us to peer deeper into this puzzle.
As we embark on this scholarly expedition, we do so with a mixture of inquisitiveness and amusement, recognizing the delightful peculiarity of our chosen inquiry. This study safeguards against the temptation to view the world solely through a utilitarian lens, reminding us of the unexpected threads that weave through the fabric of human pursuits, whether on the field of play or within the intricate circuits of technology. By unveiling the unexpected connectivity of Heineken Cup triumphs and Virginia's IT ecosystem, we hope to invite our readers to revel in the whimsical serendipity that often underlies the most unlikely associations.
In the subsequent sections, we undertake a methodical examination of the empirical data, while fostering a sense of wonder at the improbable kinship we have unearthed. Through this lens, we entreat the reader to join us in our investigation of this unexpected relationship between the thrill of victory and the intricacies of information technology, as we navigate the hitherto unexplored corridors of these seemingly disparate domains.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The primary objective of this inquiry was to rigorously scrutinize the relationship between the scores of the winning teams in the Heineken Cup Final and the number of computer network support specialists in Virginia. To achieve this, a multi-faceted approach encompassing data collection, analysis, and interpretation was employed.

Data Collection:
The first step involved the procurement of pertinent data. The scores of the winning teams in the Heineken Cup Final were sourced from reputable sports databases and archival records. The number of computer network support specialists in Virginia was obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, ensuring the reliance on credible employment statistics. The data ranged from 2012 to 2022, encapsulating a decade of sporting triumphs and technological developments.

Data Analysis:
Subsequently, the amassed data underwent meticulous scrutiny. Descriptive statistics were employed to encapsulate the fundamental characteristics of the variables under consideration. Meanwhile, a correlation analysis was performed to quantify the strength and direction of the relationship between the Heineken Cup Final winning team scores and the count of computer network support specialists in Virginia. The application of a tenuous hypothesis was avoided, as we delved into this uncharted territory of sport-infused technology empiricism.

Modeling:
In order to further delve into the potential causal mechanisms underpinning the observed correlation, a series of unconventional models were considered. Proposals such as the "Rugby Champion Effect" and the "Tech-savvy Spectator Hypothesis" were entertained, albeit with a healthy dose of skepticism. Perhaps due to a "try-umph" of ingenuity, the correlation coefficient was derived and the p-value calculated, revealing a surprising statistical significance that incited both professional curiosity and unforeseen mirth.

External Validation:
To ensure the robustness and generalizability of our findings, we sought validation from external sources, conducting a thorough review of related literature. This ensured that our exploration of the whimsical correlation between sporting victory and technological expertise was anchored in a foundation of scholarly discourse, even while we embarked on this venturesome journey of unconventional intersectionality.

Ethical Considerations:
It is imperative to note that throughout this research endeavor, ethical standards and academic integrity were paramount. Data handling and analysis were meticulously executed, taking into account the limitations and potential biases inherent in such an unorthodox inquiry. The dissemination of findings adhered to established protocols, with due recognition of the unexpectedness of the discovered association.

In summary, the comprehensive methodological framework adopted in this research facilitated an in-depth examination of the enigmatic association between Heineken Cup Final success and the proliferation of computer network support specialists in Virginia. While the seriousness of scholarly inquiry was retained, it is with a twinkle in the eye and a pun at the ready that we present these methodological exploits, mirroring the whimsical nature of our enthralling subject matter.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Heineken Cup Final winning team score and The number of computer network support specialists in Virginia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2012 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8674040, r-squared of 0.7523898, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Scoring More, Networking Better: Heineken Cup Victory and Virginia's IT Quandary

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research investigates the peculiar relationship between the winning team score in the Heineken Cup Final and the number of computer network support specialists in Virginia. Using data from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, a correlation coefficient of 0.8674040 with p < 0.01 was observed over the years 2012 to 2022, presenting a rather surprising associative link between the two seemingly disparate entities. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we reveal implications that transcend mere coincidence, raising questions about the hidden interplay of sports glory and information technology expertise. This study offers an intriguing lens through which to view the enigmatic dance of sporting achievement and technological infrastructure, and invites readers to ponder the delightful quirks of the interconnected world we inhabit.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The Heineken Cup Final has long been regarded as a pinnacle of European rugby achievement, drawing fervent fans and generating intense rivalries among teams. It stands as a testament to the competitive spirit and the sheer determination of its participants. Similarly, the field of information technology in Virginia has witnessed a remarkable surge in demand for computer network support specialists, in consonance with the relentless march of digitization in the modern world. These seemingly unrelated domains have been brought together in this research, as we delve into the intriguing link between the victorious scores in the Heineken Cup Final and the workforce landscape of Virginia's IT sector.
The choice of the Heineken Cup Final as the focal point of this research is not without its charm. With its ebbs and flows, unexpected upsets, and unforgettable triumphs, the tournament provides a rich tapestry of sporting narratives, ripe for exploration. Meanwhile, the information technology realm in Virginia presents its own complexities, with the ever-evolving nature of technological advancements and the consequential demand for specialized support. By aligning these distinct spheres, we embark on a quest to unravel the enigmatic correlation between sporting glory and the intricate web of computer network support in the state of Virginia.
The title of this paper, "Scoring More, Networking Better: Heineken Cup Victory and Virginia's IT Quandary," offers a nod to this intriguing interplay, encapsulating the overarching theme of exploring unexpected connections and fortuitous intersections. The abstract nature of these two seemingly unrelated phenomena invites an element of surprise, much like stumbling upon an unsuspected correlation in a complex dataset. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8674040 and a p-value of less than 0.01, our initial findings have piqued our curiosity and beckoned us to peer deeper into this puzzle.
As we embark on this scholarly expedition, we do so with a mixture of inquisitiveness and amusement, recognizing the delightful peculiarity of our chosen inquiry. This study safeguards against the temptation to view the world solely through a utilitarian lens, reminding us of the unexpected threads that weave through the fabric of human pursuits, whether on the field of play or within the intricate circuits of technology. By unveiling the unexpected connectivity of Heineken Cup triumphs and Virginia's IT ecosystem, we hope to invite our readers to revel in the whimsical serendipity that often underlies the most unlikely associations.
In the subsequent sections, we undertake a methodical examination of the empirical data, while fostering a sense of wonder at the improbable kinship we have unearthed. Through this lens, we entreat the reader to join us in our investigation of this unexpected relationship between the thrill of victory and the intricacies of information technology, as we navigate the hitherto unexplored corridors of these seemingly disparate domains.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of the statistical analysis reveal a notable correlation between the winning team score in the Heineken Cup Final and the number of computer network support specialists in Virginia. The correlation coefficient of 0.8674040 signifies a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This unexpected association prompts us to consider the whimsical interplay of sporting achievements and technological landscapes, evoking a sense of astonishment at the unanticipated bonds that tie together the realms of sports and information technology.

The r-squared value of 0.7523898 further underscores the robustness of the correlation, indicating that approximately 75.24% of the variance in the number of computer network support specialists in Virginia can be explained by the winning team score in the Heineken Cup Final. Such a substantial proportion of variance elucidates the degree to which these variables coalesce, leaving us pleasantly intrigued by the underlying forces at play.

Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 bolsters our confidence in the statistical significance of our findings, affirming that the observed correlation is unlikely to have occurred by mere chance. This compelling evidence compels us to reevaluate our preconceptions and adopt a more inquisitive stance toward the mysterious nexus between sporting glory and the demand for IT expertise in Virginia.

In Figure 1, we present a scatterplot depicting the robust correlation between the winning team score in the Heineken Cup Final and the number of computer network support specialists in Virginia. The scatterplot conveys the compelling coherence between these variables, further accentuating the unexpected alignment of sports triumphs and technological workforce dynamics.

The unexpected alignment of these seemingly disparate domains offers a whimsical reminder of the serendipitous connections that underlie our world. As we continue to delve into the ramifications of this unique association, we are called to embrace the delightful quirks of our interconnected existence, inviting further exploration of the captivating interplay between sporting excellence and technological infrastructure.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Heineken Cup Final winning team score and The number of computer network support specialists in Virginia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Scoring More, Networking Better: Heineken Cup Victory and Virginia's IT Quandary

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research investigates the peculiar relationship between the winning team score in the Heineken Cup Final and the number of computer network support specialists in Virginia. Using data from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, a correlation coefficient of 0.8674040 with p < 0.01 was observed over the years 2012 to 2022, presenting a rather surprising associative link between the two seemingly disparate entities. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we reveal implications that transcend mere coincidence, raising questions about the hidden interplay of sports glory and information technology expertise. This study offers an intriguing lens through which to view the enigmatic dance of sporting achievement and technological infrastructure, and invites readers to ponder the delightful quirks of the interconnected world we inhabit.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The authors find a notable dearth of literature explicitly examining the intersection of Heineken Cup Final winning team scores and the number of computer network support specialists in Virginia. However, the tangential exploration of sports-related economic impacts and the influence of technological advancements on labor markets offers a glimpse into the broader context of our research inquiry. Smith et al. (2015) shed light on the economic ripple effects of major sports events, albeit not specifically focused on rugby competitions or the IT sector. Doe (2017) delves into the changing landscape of technological professions, providing insights into the evolving demands for specialized technical expertise. Furthermore, Jones (2019) discusses the intricate relationship between sports fandom and digital engagement, hinting at the multifaceted nature of our interconnected world.
Expanding beyond the realm of academic treatises, works such as "Moneyball: The Art of Winning an Unfair Game" by Michael Lewis and "The Big Short: Inside the Doomsday Machine" by Michael Lewis, while not directly addressing our research subject, offer engaging narratives of unconventional correlations and unpredicted outcomes in sports and financial domains. The aptly titled "The IT Crowd" by Philbin and Linehan, a work of fiction portraying the comedic escapades of an IT department, presents a lighthearted exploration of technological support dynamics, albeit in a vastly different context.
Moreover, the popular internet meme "Distracted Boyfriend" serves as an amusing reference to the unexpected allure of alternative pursuits, reflecting the whimsical nature of the correlations we seek to uncover. The meme, with its humorous take on divided attention and unforeseen attractions, aligns with the underlying spirit of our investigation into the curious interplay of rugby triumphs and IT labor dynamics.
In synthesizing these eclectic strands of literature and popular culture, our research strives to infuse a sense of curiosity and amusement into the discernment of intriguing connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena. With a touch of levity and an acknowledgment of the serendipitous aspects of scholarly inquiry, we embark on this analytical journey to unearth the unexpected rapport between Heineken Cup triumphs and the intricate tapestry of Virginia's IT workforce landscape.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of the statistical analysis reveal a notable correlation between the winning team score in the Heineken Cup Final and the number of computer network support specialists in Virginia. The correlation coefficient of 0.8674040 signifies a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This unexpected association prompts us to consider the whimsical interplay of sporting achievements and technological landscapes, evoking a sense of astonishment at the unanticipated bonds that tie together the realms of sports and information technology.
The r-squared value of 0.7523898 further underscores the robustness of the correlation, indicating that approximately 75.24% of the variance in the number of computer network support specialists in Virginia can be explained by the winning team score in the Heineken Cup Final. Such a substantial proportion of variance elucidates the degree to which these variables coalesce, leaving us pleasantly intrigued by the underlying forces at play.
Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 bolsters our confidence in the statistical significance of our findings, affirming that the observed correlation is unlikely to have occurred by mere chance. This compelling evidence compels us to reevaluate our preconceptions and adopt a more inquisitive stance toward the mysterious nexus between sporting glory and the demand for IT expertise in Virginia.
In Figure 1, we present a scatterplot depicting the robust correlation between the winning team score in the Heineken Cup Final and the number of computer network support specialists in Virginia. The scatterplot conveys the compelling coherence between these variables, further accentuating the unexpected alignment of sports triumphs and technological workforce dynamics.
The unexpected alignment of these seemingly disparate domains offers a whimsical reminder of the serendipitous connections that underlie our world. As we continue to delve into the ramifications of this unique association, we are called to embrace the delightful quirks of our interconnected existence, inviting further exploration of the captivating interplay between sporting excellence and technological infrastructure.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The compelling results presented in this study affirm a robust and significant correlation between the winning team score in the Heineken Cup Final and the number of computer network support specialists in Virginia. The unexpected coherence between these variables points to a nuanced interplay that transcends traditional expectations of sports outcomes and labor market dynamics. Our findings not only contribute to the burgeoning field of interdisciplinary research but also prompt an engaging reconsideration of the whimsical connections that underpin our interconnected world.

Building upon the eclectic strands of literature and popular culture addressed in the literature review, we find that the unexpected rapport uncovered in our study attests to the enigmatic nature of phenomena that seem disparate on the surface but are intricately intertwined in practice. The amusing reference to the "Distracted Boyfriend" meme gains newfound relevance as we contemplate the unforeseen allure of this unusual association, evoking a sense of amusement and curiosity that aligns with the underlying spirit of our investigation.

Remarkably, our results reaffirm and extend the implications hinted at in prior works such as Smith et al. (2015), Doe (2017), and Jones (2019), albeit in an unforeseen context. The economic ripple effects of major sports events, the evolving demands for specialized technical expertise, and the intricate relationship between sports fandom and digital engagement now resonate with a renewed vigor, as our research uncovers a unique manifestation of these broader themes. Furthermore, the lighthearted exploration of technological support dynamics in "The IT Crowd" takes on a subtly prophetic hue, as the theatrical escapades of an IT department now seem to presage the unanticipated parallels between Heineken Cup triumphs and Virginia's IT workforce landscape.

The statistical significance of our findings, underscored by the robust correlation coefficient and the compelling r-squared value, invites us to reassess conventional boundaries and embrace the idiosyncratic interconnections that permeate our society. With a touch of levity and an acknowledgment of the serendipitous aspects of scholarly inquiry, our research unravels the compelling narrative of this unexpected rapport, prompting further exploration of the captivating interplay between sporting excellence and technological infrastructure.

In light of these results, we are called to embrace the delightful quirks of our interconnected existence, entrusting the enigmatic dance of sports glory and information technology expertise to guide our intellectual curiosity and invigorate our academic discourse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Heineken Cup Final winning team score and The number of computer network support specialists in Virginia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Scoring More, Networking Better: Heineken Cup Victory and Virginia's IT Quandary

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research investigates the peculiar relationship between the winning team score in the Heineken Cup Final and the number of computer network support specialists in Virginia. Using data from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, a correlation coefficient of 0.8674040 with p < 0.01 was observed over the years 2012 to 2022, presenting a rather surprising associative link between the two seemingly disparate entities. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we reveal implications that transcend mere coincidence, raising questions about the hidden interplay of sports glory and information technology expertise. This study offers an intriguing lens through which to view the enigmatic dance of sporting achievement and technological infrastructure, and invites readers to ponder the delightful quirks of the interconnected world we inhabit.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The Heineken Cup Final has long been regarded as a pinnacle of European rugby achievement, drawing fervent fans and generating intense rivalries among teams. It stands as a testament to the competitive spirit and the sheer determination of its participants. Similarly, the field of information technology in Virginia has witnessed a remarkable surge in demand for computer network support specialists, in consonance with the relentless march of digitization in the modern world. These seemingly unrelated domains have been brought together in this research, as we delve into the intriguing link between the victorious scores in the Heineken Cup Final and the workforce landscape of Virginia's IT sector.
The choice of the Heineken Cup Final as the focal point of this research is not without its charm. With its ebbs and flows, unexpected upsets, and unforgettable triumphs, the tournament provides a rich tapestry of sporting narratives, ripe for exploration. Meanwhile, the information technology realm in Virginia presents its own complexities, with the ever-evolving nature of technological advancements and the consequential demand for specialized support. By aligning these distinct spheres, we embark on a quest to unravel the enigmatic correlation between sporting glory and the intricate web of computer network support in the state of Virginia.
The title of this paper, "Scoring More, Networking Better: Heineken Cup Victory and Virginia's IT Quandary," offers a nod to this intriguing interplay, encapsulating the overarching theme of exploring unexpected connections and fortuitous intersections. The abstract nature of these two seemingly unrelated phenomena invites an element of surprise, much like stumbling upon an unsuspected correlation in a complex dataset. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8674040 and a p-value of less than 0.01, our initial findings have piqued our curiosity and beckoned us to peer deeper into this puzzle.
As we embark on this scholarly expedition, we do so with a mixture of inquisitiveness and amusement, recognizing the delightful peculiarity of our chosen inquiry. This study safeguards against the temptation to view the world solely through a utilitarian lens, reminding us of the unexpected threads that weave through the fabric of human pursuits, whether on the field of play or within the intricate circuits of technology. By unveiling the unexpected connectivity of Heineken Cup triumphs and Virginia's IT ecosystem, we hope to invite our readers to revel in the whimsical serendipity that often underlies the most unlikely associations.
In the subsequent sections, we undertake a methodical examination of the empirical data, while fostering a sense of wonder at the improbable kinship we have unearthed. Through this lens, we entreat the reader to join us in our investigation of this unexpected relationship between the thrill of victory and the intricacies of information technology, as we navigate the hitherto unexplored corridors of these seemingly disparate domains.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of the statistical analysis reveal a notable correlation between the winning team score in the Heineken Cup Final and the number of computer network support specialists in Virginia. The correlation coefficient of 0.8674040 signifies a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This unexpected association prompts us to consider the whimsical interplay of sporting achievements and technological landscapes, evoking a sense of astonishment at the unanticipated bonds that tie together the realms of sports and information technology.
The r-squared value of 0.7523898 further underscores the robustness of the correlation, indicating that approximately 75.24% of the variance in the number of computer network support specialists in Virginia can be explained by the winning team score in the Heineken Cup Final. Such a substantial proportion of variance elucidates the degree to which these variables coalesce, leaving us pleasantly intrigued by the underlying forces at play.
Additionally, the p-value of less than 0.01 bolsters our confidence in the statistical significance of our findings, affirming that the observed correlation is unlikely to have occurred by mere chance. This compelling evidence compels us to reevaluate our preconceptions and adopt a more inquisitive stance toward the mysterious nexus between sporting glory and the demand for IT expertise in Virginia.
In Figure 1, we present a scatterplot depicting the robust correlation between the winning team score in the Heineken Cup Final and the number of computer network support specialists in Virginia. The scatterplot conveys the compelling coherence between these variables, further accentuating the unexpected alignment of sports triumphs and technological workforce dynamics.
The unexpected alignment of these seemingly disparate domains offers a whimsical reminder of the serendipitous connections that underlie our world. As we continue to delve into the ramifications of this unique association, we are called to embrace the delightful quirks of our interconnected existence, inviting further exploration of the captivating interplay between sporting excellence and technological infrastructure.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has unveiled a rather delightful and unexpected relationship between the winning team score in the Heineken Cup Final and the number of computer network support specialists in Virginia. The striking correlation coefficient of 0.8674040, along with a p-value of less than 0.01, suggests an intriguing link that defies conventional expectations. This unforeseen connection beckons us to consider the whimsical interplay of sporting achievements and technological landscapes, prompting a reevaluation of the often overlooked influences that shape our societal domains.

The robust r-squared value further accentuates the extent to which the winning team score in the Heineken Cup Final can elucidate the variance in the number of computer network support specialists in Virginia, leaving us pleasantly intrigued by the underlying forces at play. The scatterplot presented in Figure 1 serves as a visual testament to the cohesive relationship between these apparently incongruous variables, offering a whimsical reminder of the tangled web of associations that permeate our world.

As we reflect on the unexpected alignment of these seemingly disparate realms, one cannot help but marvel at the humorous quirkiness of such interconnectedness. The peculiar bond between sporting triumphs and the demand for IT expertise in Virginia serves as a gentle nudge to embrace the delightful idiosyncrasies that underpin our daily pursuits.

While our findings invite continued curiosity and contemplation, it is our firm assertion that no further research is warranted in this area. The findings of this study represent a curiously charming and conclusive insight into the delightful intertwining of sporting triumphs and technological exigencies, leaving us with a renewed fondness for the delightful surprises that often emerge from the most unexpected connections.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Scoring More, Networking Better: Heineken Cup Victory and Virginia's IT Quandary. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Sports Analytics and Technology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Scoring More, Networking Better: Heineken Cup Victory and Virginia's IT Quandary. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Global Sports and Technology Advancement


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Scoring More, Networking Better: Heineken Cup Victory and Virginia's IT Quandary with an abstract of This research investigates the peculiar relationship between the winning team score in the Heineken Cup Final and the number of computer network support specialists in Virginia. Using data from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, a correlation coefficient of 0.8674040 with p < 0.01 was observed over the years 2012 to 2022, presenting a rather surprising associative link between the two seemingly disparate entities. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we reveal implications that transcend mere coincidence, raising questions about the hidden interplay of sports glory and information technology expertise. This study offers an intriguing lens through which to view the enigmatic dance of sporting achievement and technological infrastructure, and invites readers to ponder the delightful quirks of the interconnected world we inhabit.

ChatGPT:

Heineken Cup Final, Virginia computer network support specialists, sports victory correlation, IT workforce analysis, sports achievement impact, information technology statistics, sports and technology relationship, sports performance influence, correlation between sports success and IT professionals, interconnected world implications

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Heineken Cup Final winning team score
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Heineken Cup Final winning team score

The number of computer network support specialists in Virginia
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of computer network support specialists in Virginia
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of computer network support specialists in Virginia

Correlation r = 0.8674040 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7523898 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 75.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of computer network support specialists in Virginia) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Heineken Cup Final winning team score) over the 11 years from 2012 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00054. 0.0005423041685828331000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.87 in 0.054% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,844 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.56, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Heineken Cup Final winning team score (Score)4216232421281520312224
The number of computer network support specialists in Virginia (Laborers)88107020703074307390733069706780772069806730




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([42,16,23,24,21,28,15,20,31,22,24,])
array_2 = np.array([8810,7020,7030,7430,7390,7330,6970,6780,7720,6980,6730,])
array_1_name = "Heineken Cup Final winning team score"
array_2_name = "The number of computer network support specialists in Virginia"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the rating guru we've been waiting for!


Correlation ID: 3647 · Black Variable ID: 387 · Red Variable ID: 19561
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0