Additional Info: Current total views of videos released that year.
Report an error
Total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Biomass power generated in Lithuania | r=0.96 | 13yrs | Yes! |
U.S. Bancorp's stock price (USB) | r=0.95 | 15yrs | No |
Boeing's stock price (BA) | r=0.91 | 15yrs | No |
Average number of milk cows in the United States | r=0.9 | 14yrs | No |
Intel's stock price (INTC) | r=0.9 | 15yrs | No |
Royal Caribbean Cruises' stock price (RCL) | r=0.9 | 15yrs | No |
Google searches for 'how to immigrate to canada' | r=0.9 | 15yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'white house hotline' | r=0.79 | 15yrs | No |
Total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)