about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #4,930 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the second variable is Google searches for 'how to immigrate to canada'.  The chart goes from 2009 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Tom Scott's videos were so informative and engaging that people couldn't help but consider leaving their current country and starting a new life in Canada, where they could apply Tom's intelligent and curious approach to everyday life. After watching his content, people just couldn't resist the urge to pack their bags and move to the land of maple syrup and politeness.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image of a vibrant 3D scene in the Pixar style. In the forefront, showcase large bold numbers representing the total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos. Next to it, depict a separate graphic representing the significant increase in Google searches for "how to immigrate to Canada." In the background, feature stunning imagery of iconic Canadian landmarks such as the CN Tower and majestic snowy mountains. The goal is to symbolize the allure of relocating to Canada influenced by Tom Scott's captivating content. The scene should be visually captivating and appealing. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Total views on Tom Scott YouTube videos and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to canada'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cute 2D animation Surrealism 3D Pixar Style 3D Pixar Style Sci-fi fantacy
ChatGPT: 3D Pixar Style

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Total views on Tom Scott YouTube videos and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to canada', in the following situation: Tom Scott's videos were so informative and engaging that people couldn't help but consider leaving their current country and starting a new life in Canada, where they could apply Tom's intelligent and curious approach to everyday life. After watching his content, people just couldn't resist the urge to pack their bags and move to the land of maple syrup and politeness.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the visualization, the number of Total views on Tom Scott YouTube videos is displayed in large, bold numbers. Meanwhile, Google searches for "how to immigrate to Canada" are represented in a separate graphic, showing a significant increase in search volume. The background features imagery of iconic Canadian landmarks such as the CN Tower and snowy mountains, symbolizing the lure of relocating to Canada inspired by Tom's captivating content.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ 3D Pixar Style ] and depicting this scene: In the visualization, the number of Total views on Tom Scott YouTube videos is displayed in large, bold numbers. Meanwhile, Google searches for "how to immigrate to Canada" are represented in a separate graphic, showing a significant increase in search volume. The background features imagery of iconic Canadian landmarks such as the CN Tower and snowy mountains, symbolizing the lure of relocating to Canada inspired by Tom's captivating content. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image of a vibrant 3D scene in the Pixar style. In the forefront, showcase large bold numbers representing the total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos. Next to it, depict a separate graphic representing the significant increase in Google searches for "how to immigrate to Canada." In the background, feature stunning imagery of iconic Canadian landmarks such as the CN Tower and majestic snowy mountains. The goal is to symbolize the allure of relocating to Canada influenced by Tom Scott's captivating content. The scene should be visually captivating and appealing.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Total views on Tom Scott YouTube videos caused how to immigrate to canada (Google searches for 'how to immigrate to canada') to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Tangoing with Tom: Total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the Trend of 'Travelling to Toronto' in Google searches

The Journal of Online Culture and Internet Trends

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on Tom Scott YouTube videos and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to canada'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from YouTube and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9024189 and p < 0.01 for 2009 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Tangoing with Tom: Total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the Trend of 'Travelling to Toronto' in Google searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
Traversing the digital landscape, we set our sights on unraveling the enigmatic connection between the total views on Tom Scott's tantalizing YouTube videos and the trend of 'how to immigrate to Canada' Google searches. With a skip in our step and data in hand, we delved into the depths of YouTube and Google Trends to scrutinize this peculiar pairing. Our findings unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9024189, beckoning us to ponder whether there's an undercover Canadian immigration campaign lurking in the witty world of Tom Scott's videos. This quirky correlation, with p < 0.01, left us envisaging a world where the allure of Canada and the allure of YouTube collided in a comical, clandestine courtship. So, if you find yourself binge-watching Tom Scott and suddenly searching for maple syrup and moose sightings, just remember, the correlation may not be causation, but it sure makes for a 'wonderfully weird' research finding!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on Tom Scott YouTube videos and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to canada'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Tangoing with Tom: Total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the Trend of 'Travelling to Toronto' in Google searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
Traversing the digital landscape, we set our sights on unraveling the enigmatic connection between the total views on Tom Scott's tantalizing YouTube videos and the trend of 'how to immigrate to Canada' Google searches. With a skip in our step and data in hand, we delved into the depths of YouTube and Google Trends to scrutinize this peculiar pairing. Our findings unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9024189, beckoning us to ponder whether there's an undercover Canadian immigration campaign lurking in the witty world of Tom Scott's videos. This quirky correlation, with p < 0.01, left us envisaging a world where the allure of Canada and the allure of YouTube collided in a comical, clandestine courtship. So, if you find yourself binge-watching Tom Scott and suddenly searching for maple syrup and moose sightings, just remember, the correlation may not be causation, but it sure makes for a 'wonderfully weird' research finding!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Waltzing its way into the digital realm, our study endeavors to shed light on a peculiar and, dare we say, quixotic connection between the total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the trend of 'how to immigrate to Canada' Google searches. It's an odd pairing, like bacon and chocolate, or perhaps like maple syrup on everything in Canada. As we embarked on this adventure, we couldn't help but wonder if there's a clandestine, comedy-infused conspiracy afoot that's coaxing viewers to trade their current coordinates for a one-way ticket to the Great White North, eh?

Picture this: you're innocently indulging in the intellectual amusement of Tom Scott's videos, chuckling at his witticisms and pondering the delightful oddities of the universe, when suddenly, an inexplicable yearning to explore the land of poutine and politeness creeps in. Is it mere coincidence, or is there a clandestine call to Canucks embedded within the captivating content of these YouTube videos?

Our journey unraveled as we delved into the depths of data, armed with our trusty statistical tools and a healthy dose of skepticism. We were met with a correlation coefficient of 0.9024189, beckoning us to consider the possibility that there's more afoot than meets the eye – or the algorithm. With p < 0.01, we found ourselves in a whirlwind of wonder, imagining a world where the irresistible allure of Canada and the tantalizing allure of YouTube collided in an unexpected and uncharted courtship.

So, as we set the stage for our findings, we invite you to join us on this whimsical expedition, where the enigmatic dance between YouTube viewership and Canadian curiosity unfolds before our curious eyes. As we navigate through the data, we channel the spirit of inquisitiveness and humor, pondering whether the algorithmic allure of Canada is captivating the hearts and search histories of YouTube enthusiasts worldwide.

As we delve deeper into the wilderness of data and delve further into the digital jungle, let's remember that correlation does not imply causation, but it sure does make for a delightfully peculiar research voyage!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on Tom Scott YouTube videos and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to canada'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Tangoing with Tom: Total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the Trend of 'Travelling to Toronto' in Google searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
Traversing the digital landscape, we set our sights on unraveling the enigmatic connection between the total views on Tom Scott's tantalizing YouTube videos and the trend of 'how to immigrate to Canada' Google searches. With a skip in our step and data in hand, we delved into the depths of YouTube and Google Trends to scrutinize this peculiar pairing. Our findings unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9024189, beckoning us to ponder whether there's an undercover Canadian immigration campaign lurking in the witty world of Tom Scott's videos. This quirky correlation, with p < 0.01, left us envisaging a world where the allure of Canada and the allure of YouTube collided in a comical, clandestine courtship. So, if you find yourself binge-watching Tom Scott and suddenly searching for maple syrup and moose sightings, just remember, the correlation may not be causation, but it sure makes for a 'wonderfully weird' research finding!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Waltzing its way into the digital realm, our study endeavors to shed light on a peculiar and, dare we say, quixotic connection between the total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the trend of 'how to immigrate to Canada' Google searches. It's an odd pairing, like bacon and chocolate, or perhaps like maple syrup on everything in Canada. As we embarked on this adventure, we couldn't help but wonder if there's a clandestine, comedy-infused conspiracy afoot that's coaxing viewers to trade their current coordinates for a one-way ticket to the Great White North, eh?
Picture this: you're innocently indulging in the intellectual amusement of Tom Scott's videos, chuckling at his witticisms and pondering the delightful oddities of the universe, when suddenly, an inexplicable yearning to explore the land of poutine and politeness creeps in. Is it mere coincidence, or is there a clandestine call to Canucks embedded within the captivating content of these YouTube videos?
Our journey unraveled as we delved into the depths of data, armed with our trusty statistical tools and a healthy dose of skepticism. We were met with a correlation coefficient of 0.9024189, beckoning us to consider the possibility that there's more afoot than meets the eye – or the algorithm. With p < 0.01, we found ourselves in a whirlwind of wonder, imagining a world where the irresistible allure of Canada and the tantalizing allure of YouTube collided in an unexpected and uncharted courtship.
So, as we set the stage for our findings, we invite you to join us on this whimsical expedition, where the enigmatic dance between YouTube viewership and Canadian curiosity unfolds before our curious eyes. As we navigate through the data, we channel the spirit of inquisitiveness and humor, pondering whether the algorithmic allure of Canada is captivating the hearts and search histories of YouTube enthusiasts worldwide.
As we delve deeper into the wilderness of data and delve further into the digital jungle, let's remember that correlation does not imply causation, but it sure does make for a delightfully peculiar research voyage!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

To fathom the whimsical connection between the total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the trend of 'how to immigrate to Canada' Google searches, we embarked on a quest to survey the existing literature, seeking insights into this peculiar pair. Our journey led us through serious studies and scholarly works, but also meandered into the realm of fiction and childhood nostalgia, making for an unexpectedly delightful romp through the research landscape.

In "Quantitative Analysis of YouTube Viewership and International Migration Aspirations" by Smith et al., the authors find a cautious correlation between YouTube viewership patterns and online searches related to immigration procedures in various countries. Similarly, Doe and Jones, in their paper "Digital Dalliances: Exploring Online Content Consumption and Aspirations of Relocation," delve into the intriguing world of online content consumption and its potential influence on individuals' desires for international migration. These scholarly works help set the stage for our exploration of the curious case of Tom Scott's impact on Canadian immigration curiosity.

Transitioning to non-fiction literature, "The Canadian Immigration Handbook" by Lorem and Ipsum offers a comprehensive guide for individuals contemplating a move to the Great White North. In a similar vein, "Navigating North: A Tourist's Take on Canada" by Lorem delves into the various attractions and logistical considerations for prospective immigrants. These informative texts provide a backdrop to the real-world intrigue surrounding Canadian immigration as we set the scene for our investigation.

Venturing into the realm of fiction, we encounter "The Maple Mysteries" by Mystery Author X, a whimsical tale laced with intrigue and immigration escapades, sparking the imagination with an unconventional take on the allure of Canadian soil. Additionally, "Northern Lights and Syrup Delights" by Fictional Writer Y weaves a captivating narrative of wanderlust and the magnetic pull of Canada, painting a vivid picture of the mystical allure that beckons from the digital realm.

Our foray into childhood nostalgia unearthed the animated series "The Adventure of Timmy and Sarah in Maple Land," a whimsical show that chronicles the adventures of two siblings as they navigate the enchanting landscapes of Canada. Furthermore, the classic cartoon "Quest for the Majestic Moose" offers a lighthearted portrayal of the lure of Canadian wildlife, appealing to the inner child in all of us.

As we wade through this eclectic medley of literature and media, we find ourselves at the crossroads of curiosity and comedy, poised to unravel the mystery behind the enthralling connection between Tom Scott's YouTube viewership and the perennial fascination with traversing the Canadian border. So, with a twinkle in our eyes and a dash of mirth in our hearts, we set the stage for our whimsical pursuit of understanding this enchanting correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on Tom Scott YouTube videos and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to canada'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from YouTube and Google Trends . You used data from 2009 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Tangoing with Tom: Total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the Trend of 'Travelling to Toronto' in Google searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
Traversing the digital landscape, we set our sights on unraveling the enigmatic connection between the total views on Tom Scott's tantalizing YouTube videos and the trend of 'how to immigrate to Canada' Google searches. With a skip in our step and data in hand, we delved into the depths of YouTube and Google Trends to scrutinize this peculiar pairing. Our findings unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9024189, beckoning us to ponder whether there's an undercover Canadian immigration campaign lurking in the witty world of Tom Scott's videos. This quirky correlation, with p < 0.01, left us envisaging a world where the allure of Canada and the allure of YouTube collided in a comical, clandestine courtship. So, if you find yourself binge-watching Tom Scott and suddenly searching for maple syrup and moose sightings, just remember, the correlation may not be causation, but it sure makes for a 'wonderfully weird' research finding!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Waltzing its way into the digital realm, our study endeavors to shed light on a peculiar and, dare we say, quixotic connection between the total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the trend of 'how to immigrate to Canada' Google searches. It's an odd pairing, like bacon and chocolate, or perhaps like maple syrup on everything in Canada. As we embarked on this adventure, we couldn't help but wonder if there's a clandestine, comedy-infused conspiracy afoot that's coaxing viewers to trade their current coordinates for a one-way ticket to the Great White North, eh?
Picture this: you're innocently indulging in the intellectual amusement of Tom Scott's videos, chuckling at his witticisms and pondering the delightful oddities of the universe, when suddenly, an inexplicable yearning to explore the land of poutine and politeness creeps in. Is it mere coincidence, or is there a clandestine call to Canucks embedded within the captivating content of these YouTube videos?
Our journey unraveled as we delved into the depths of data, armed with our trusty statistical tools and a healthy dose of skepticism. We were met with a correlation coefficient of 0.9024189, beckoning us to consider the possibility that there's more afoot than meets the eye – or the algorithm. With p < 0.01, we found ourselves in a whirlwind of wonder, imagining a world where the irresistible allure of Canada and the tantalizing allure of YouTube collided in an unexpected and uncharted courtship.
So, as we set the stage for our findings, we invite you to join us on this whimsical expedition, where the enigmatic dance between YouTube viewership and Canadian curiosity unfolds before our curious eyes. As we navigate through the data, we channel the spirit of inquisitiveness and humor, pondering whether the algorithmic allure of Canada is captivating the hearts and search histories of YouTube enthusiasts worldwide.
As we delve deeper into the wilderness of data and delve further into the digital jungle, let's remember that correlation does not imply causation, but it sure does make for a delightfully peculiar research voyage!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the intriguing entanglement between total views on Tom Scott’s YouTube videos and the trend of ‘how to immigrate to Canada’ Google searches, our research team embarked on a digital escapade that would make Phileas Fogg's journey seem like a mere walk in the park. Armed with curiosity as our compass and statistical software as our trusty steed, we traversed the vast expanse of data from 2009 to 2023, channeling the spirit of digital detectives in pursuit of answers that eluded the ordinary observer.

Our first port of call was the treasure trove of YouTube analytics, where we meticulously collected data on the total views of Tom Scott’s mesmerizing and intellectually stimulating videos. From the quirky escapades of 'Amazing Places' to the thought-provoking explorations in 'Things You Might Not Know,' we left no stone unturned in our quest to quantify the viewership allure of Tom Scott's virtual odysseys.

Venturing further into the digital wilderness, we turned our gaze towards the labyrinthine archives of Google Trends. With the tenacity of adventurers seeking lost treasure, we scoured the search interest data for the elusive quest of 'how to immigrate to Canada,' aiming to capture the ebb and flow of curiosity about this northern utopia across the years. Like intrepid explorers charting unknown territories, we extracted the search interest index and regional interest data, seeking to decode the enigmatic rhythms of virtual wanderlust that echoed through the corridors of the internet.

In a gesture of digital diplomacy, we harmonized the temporal dimensions of the YouTube viewership and Google search data. Through temporal alignment and synchronization, we harmonized the unit of measurement and temporal granularity, ensuring that our analysis captured the synergy between moments of digital enlightenment and the incipient yearning for life in the land of snow-capped mountains and syrup-soaked dreams. This method aimed to elucidate the coalescence of digital engagements and migratory musings, creating a harmonious medley of data points that painted a vibrant tableau of human curiosity and cyberspace dalliance.

With the multivariate nature of our dataset brimming with curiosity and captivation, we employed a suite of statistical methods that would make even Turing's head spin with admiration. From the elegant dance of correlation analysis to the seductive embrace of regression modeling, we sought to distill patterns from the digital cacophony, all while acknowledging that causation remained elusive in this whimsical waltz of data.

In the spirit of navigating uncharted territories, we sought to lend our findings a degree of interpretative flair, recognizing the enticing allure of storytelling within the tapestry of research. Thus, armed with the saber of scholarly rigor and the shield of academic prudence, we embarked on our expedition to discern the contours of this peculiar pairing of digital phenomena.

While our methodology embraced precision and rigor, we also indulged in the art of whimsy and wonder, recognizing that the endeavor to decode the digital duet of Tom Scott's YouTube empire and the siren call of Canadian shores was as much a journey of the mind as it was an exploration of data. So, as we unveil the findings that emerged from this virtual odyssey, we invite fellow wanderers of the digital realm to join us in savoring the turbulent tango of technology and curiosity that underpins our enthralling results.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on Tom Scott YouTube videos and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to canada'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from YouTube and Google Trends .

For the time period 2009 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.9024189, r-squared of 0.8143599, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Tangoing with Tom: Total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the Trend of 'Travelling to Toronto' in Google searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
Traversing the digital landscape, we set our sights on unraveling the enigmatic connection between the total views on Tom Scott's tantalizing YouTube videos and the trend of 'how to immigrate to Canada' Google searches. With a skip in our step and data in hand, we delved into the depths of YouTube and Google Trends to scrutinize this peculiar pairing. Our findings unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9024189, beckoning us to ponder whether there's an undercover Canadian immigration campaign lurking in the witty world of Tom Scott's videos. This quirky correlation, with p < 0.01, left us envisaging a world where the allure of Canada and the allure of YouTube collided in a comical, clandestine courtship. So, if you find yourself binge-watching Tom Scott and suddenly searching for maple syrup and moose sightings, just remember, the correlation may not be causation, but it sure makes for a 'wonderfully weird' research finding!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Waltzing its way into the digital realm, our study endeavors to shed light on a peculiar and, dare we say, quixotic connection between the total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the trend of 'how to immigrate to Canada' Google searches. It's an odd pairing, like bacon and chocolate, or perhaps like maple syrup on everything in Canada. As we embarked on this adventure, we couldn't help but wonder if there's a clandestine, comedy-infused conspiracy afoot that's coaxing viewers to trade their current coordinates for a one-way ticket to the Great White North, eh?
Picture this: you're innocently indulging in the intellectual amusement of Tom Scott's videos, chuckling at his witticisms and pondering the delightful oddities of the universe, when suddenly, an inexplicable yearning to explore the land of poutine and politeness creeps in. Is it mere coincidence, or is there a clandestine call to Canucks embedded within the captivating content of these YouTube videos?
Our journey unraveled as we delved into the depths of data, armed with our trusty statistical tools and a healthy dose of skepticism. We were met with a correlation coefficient of 0.9024189, beckoning us to consider the possibility that there's more afoot than meets the eye – or the algorithm. With p < 0.01, we found ourselves in a whirlwind of wonder, imagining a world where the irresistible allure of Canada and the tantalizing allure of YouTube collided in an unexpected and uncharted courtship.
So, as we set the stage for our findings, we invite you to join us on this whimsical expedition, where the enigmatic dance between YouTube viewership and Canadian curiosity unfolds before our curious eyes. As we navigate through the data, we channel the spirit of inquisitiveness and humor, pondering whether the algorithmic allure of Canada is captivating the hearts and search histories of YouTube enthusiasts worldwide.
As we delve deeper into the wilderness of data and delve further into the digital jungle, let's remember that correlation does not imply causation, but it sure does make for a delightfully peculiar research voyage!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The data we collected from 2009 to 2023 has unraveled an undeniable correlation between the total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the trend of 'how to immigrate to Canada' Google searches. Our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9024189, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. In fact, the r-squared value of 0.8143599 further corroborates the robustness of this connection.

To illustrate this striking correlation, we present Fig. 1, which showcases the scatterplot depicting the enchanting dance between total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the burgeoning interest in Canadian immigration. The scatterplot unmistakably depicts the synchrony between these two trends, beckoning us to ponder the whimsical intertwining of YouTube viewership and dreams of Canadian maple bliss.

The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the statistical significance of this relationship, leaving us with a delightful conundrum. We find ourselves teetering between the realms of statistical inquiry and whimsical wonder, where the allure of Canada and the captivating content of Tom Scott's videos converge in an unexpected union.

As we shuffle through the data, it becomes abundantly clear that the magnetic charm of Canada and the magnetic appeal of Tom Scott's YouTube creations may be orchestrating a clandestine waltz across the digital domain. Therefore, while correlation may not imply causation, the tantalizing correlation we've uncovered certainly makes for an intriguing and, dare I say, punny research finding.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on Tom Scott YouTube videos and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to canada'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Tangoing with Tom: Total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the Trend of 'Travelling to Toronto' in Google searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
Traversing the digital landscape, we set our sights on unraveling the enigmatic connection between the total views on Tom Scott's tantalizing YouTube videos and the trend of 'how to immigrate to Canada' Google searches. With a skip in our step and data in hand, we delved into the depths of YouTube and Google Trends to scrutinize this peculiar pairing. Our findings unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9024189, beckoning us to ponder whether there's an undercover Canadian immigration campaign lurking in the witty world of Tom Scott's videos. This quirky correlation, with p < 0.01, left us envisaging a world where the allure of Canada and the allure of YouTube collided in a comical, clandestine courtship. So, if you find yourself binge-watching Tom Scott and suddenly searching for maple syrup and moose sightings, just remember, the correlation may not be causation, but it sure makes for a 'wonderfully weird' research finding!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
To fathom the whimsical connection between the total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the trend of 'how to immigrate to Canada' Google searches, we embarked on a quest to survey the existing literature, seeking insights into this peculiar pair. Our journey led us through serious studies and scholarly works, but also meandered into the realm of fiction and childhood nostalgia, making for an unexpectedly delightful romp through the research landscape.
In "Quantitative Analysis of YouTube Viewership and International Migration Aspirations" by Smith et al., the authors find a cautious correlation between YouTube viewership patterns and online searches related to immigration procedures in various countries. Similarly, Doe and Jones, in their paper "Digital Dalliances: Exploring Online Content Consumption and Aspirations of Relocation," delve into the intriguing world of online content consumption and its potential influence on individuals' desires for international migration. These scholarly works help set the stage for our exploration of the curious case of Tom Scott's impact on Canadian immigration curiosity.
Transitioning to non-fiction literature, "The Canadian Immigration Handbook" by Lorem and Ipsum offers a comprehensive guide for individuals contemplating a move to the Great White North. In a similar vein, "Navigating North: A Tourist's Take on Canada" by Lorem delves into the various attractions and logistical considerations for prospective immigrants. These informative texts provide a backdrop to the real-world intrigue surrounding Canadian immigration as we set the scene for our investigation.
Venturing into the realm of fiction, we encounter "The Maple Mysteries" by Mystery Author X, a whimsical tale laced with intrigue and immigration escapades, sparking the imagination with an unconventional take on the allure of Canadian soil. Additionally, "Northern Lights and Syrup Delights" by Fictional Writer Y weaves a captivating narrative of wanderlust and the magnetic pull of Canada, painting a vivid picture of the mystical allure that beckons from the digital realm.
Our foray into childhood nostalgia unearthed the animated series "The Adventure of Timmy and Sarah in Maple Land," a whimsical show that chronicles the adventures of two siblings as they navigate the enchanting landscapes of Canada. Furthermore, the classic cartoon "Quest for the Majestic Moose" offers a lighthearted portrayal of the lure of Canadian wildlife, appealing to the inner child in all of us.
As we wade through this eclectic medley of literature and media, we find ourselves at the crossroads of curiosity and comedy, poised to unravel the mystery behind the enthralling connection between Tom Scott's YouTube viewership and the perennial fascination with traversing the Canadian border. So, with a twinkle in our eyes and a dash of mirth in our hearts, we set the stage for our whimsical pursuit of understanding this enchanting correlation.

[[RESULTS]]
The data we collected from 2009 to 2023 has unraveled an undeniable correlation between the total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the trend of 'how to immigrate to Canada' Google searches. Our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9024189, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. In fact, the r-squared value of 0.8143599 further corroborates the robustness of this connection.
To illustrate this striking correlation, we present Fig. 1, which showcases the scatterplot depicting the enchanting dance between total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the burgeoning interest in Canadian immigration. The scatterplot unmistakably depicts the synchrony between these two trends, beckoning us to ponder the whimsical intertwining of YouTube viewership and dreams of Canadian maple bliss.
The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the statistical significance of this relationship, leaving us with a delightful conundrum. We find ourselves teetering between the realms of statistical inquiry and whimsical wonder, where the allure of Canada and the captivating content of Tom Scott's videos converge in an unexpected union.
As we shuffle through the data, it becomes abundantly clear that the magnetic charm of Canada and the magnetic appeal of Tom Scott's YouTube creations may be orchestrating a clandestine waltz across the digital domain. Therefore, while correlation may not imply causation, the tantalizing correlation we've uncovered certainly makes for an intriguing and, dare I say, punny research finding.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings unveiled a remarkable correlation between the total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the trend of 'how to immigrate to Canada' Google searches, aligning with prior research that hinted at the enigmatic interplay between online content consumption and aspirations for relocation. Smith et al.'s cautionary correlation findings and Doe and Jones' exploration of online content's influence on migration aspirations resonated with our discovery, albeit with a jocular twist that Tom Scott's captivating videos appear to be leading a comedic campaign to entice viewers into Canadian daydreams.

Drawing from the literature review, it is evident that our study adds a whimsical yet statistically significant layer to the existing understanding of the quirky courtship between YouTube viewership and the siren call of Canadian shores. This correlation, with a wink and a nudge, reinforces the notion that the digital realm holds both tantalizing content and unexpected influences, with Tom Scott appearing as an unintentional (or is it intentional?) provocateur of Canadian curiosity.

Our results not only bolster the scholarly dialogue on online content's potential impact but also add a mischievous melody to this virtuoso of statistical synchrony. As we traverse the whimsical interplay between YouTube musings and Canadian reveries, we must tread lightly between caution and comedy, knowing that correlation does not necessarily imply causation, alBEAR it sure makes for a 'pawsitively' entertaining research endeavor.

In the grand scheme of scholarly pursuits, our discovery aligns with the tradition of mixing levity with erudition, reminding us that even in the rigors of statistical analysis, there lies an undercurrent of playfulness and quirkiness. So, as we bid adieu to this delightful dalliance with data, we are left pondering the merry moose dance between Tom Scott's captivating content and the allure of Canada, leaving us smiling in the wondrously weird world of research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on Tom Scott YouTube videos and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to canada'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Tangoing with Tom: Total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the Trend of 'Travelling to Toronto' in Google searches

[[ABSTRACT]]
Traversing the digital landscape, we set our sights on unraveling the enigmatic connection between the total views on Tom Scott's tantalizing YouTube videos and the trend of 'how to immigrate to Canada' Google searches. With a skip in our step and data in hand, we delved into the depths of YouTube and Google Trends to scrutinize this peculiar pairing. Our findings unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9024189, beckoning us to ponder whether there's an undercover Canadian immigration campaign lurking in the witty world of Tom Scott's videos. This quirky correlation, with p < 0.01, left us envisaging a world where the allure of Canada and the allure of YouTube collided in a comical, clandestine courtship. So, if you find yourself binge-watching Tom Scott and suddenly searching for maple syrup and moose sightings, just remember, the correlation may not be causation, but it sure makes for a 'wonderfully weird' research finding!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Waltzing its way into the digital realm, our study endeavors to shed light on a peculiar and, dare we say, quixotic connection between the total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the trend of 'how to immigrate to Canada' Google searches. It's an odd pairing, like bacon and chocolate, or perhaps like maple syrup on everything in Canada. As we embarked on this adventure, we couldn't help but wonder if there's a clandestine, comedy-infused conspiracy afoot that's coaxing viewers to trade their current coordinates for a one-way ticket to the Great White North, eh?
Picture this: you're innocently indulging in the intellectual amusement of Tom Scott's videos, chuckling at his witticisms and pondering the delightful oddities of the universe, when suddenly, an inexplicable yearning to explore the land of poutine and politeness creeps in. Is it mere coincidence, or is there a clandestine call to Canucks embedded within the captivating content of these YouTube videos?
Our journey unraveled as we delved into the depths of data, armed with our trusty statistical tools and a healthy dose of skepticism. We were met with a correlation coefficient of 0.9024189, beckoning us to consider the possibility that there's more afoot than meets the eye – or the algorithm. With p < 0.01, we found ourselves in a whirlwind of wonder, imagining a world where the irresistible allure of Canada and the tantalizing allure of YouTube collided in an unexpected and uncharted courtship.
So, as we set the stage for our findings, we invite you to join us on this whimsical expedition, where the enigmatic dance between YouTube viewership and Canadian curiosity unfolds before our curious eyes. As we navigate through the data, we channel the spirit of inquisitiveness and humor, pondering whether the algorithmic allure of Canada is captivating the hearts and search histories of YouTube enthusiasts worldwide.
As we delve deeper into the wilderness of data and delve further into the digital jungle, let's remember that correlation does not imply causation, but it sure does make for a delightfully peculiar research voyage!

[[RESULTS]]
The data we collected from 2009 to 2023 has unraveled an undeniable correlation between the total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the trend of 'how to immigrate to Canada' Google searches. Our analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9024189, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. In fact, the r-squared value of 0.8143599 further corroborates the robustness of this connection.
To illustrate this striking correlation, we present Fig. 1, which showcases the scatterplot depicting the enchanting dance between total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the burgeoning interest in Canadian immigration. The scatterplot unmistakably depicts the synchrony between these two trends, beckoning us to ponder the whimsical intertwining of YouTube viewership and dreams of Canadian maple bliss.
The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the statistical significance of this relationship, leaving us with a delightful conundrum. We find ourselves teetering between the realms of statistical inquiry and whimsical wonder, where the allure of Canada and the captivating content of Tom Scott's videos converge in an unexpected union.
As we shuffle through the data, it becomes abundantly clear that the magnetic charm of Canada and the magnetic appeal of Tom Scott's YouTube creations may be orchestrating a clandestine waltz across the digital domain. Therefore, while correlation may not imply causation, the tantalizing correlation we've uncovered certainly makes for an intriguing and, dare I say, punny research finding.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation into the quirky connection between total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the trend of 'how to immigrate to Canada' Google searches has left us pondering the whimsical and perhaps clandestine courtship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9024189, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01, has undeniably captured our attention, much like the lure of a warm poutine on a cold Canadian day.

As we tangoed through the data, we couldn't help but humorously speculate on the potential influence of Tom Scott's witty content in arousing an inexplicable yearning for Canadian maple syrup and Mountie musings. The idea of a covert campaign for Canadian immigration embedded within the digital delights of YouTube certainly tickles the funny bone, much like a comedian with a penchant for puns.

Nonetheless, while it may be tempting to attribute this correlation to a cleverly crafted campaign to attract new residents to the Great White North, we must remember that correlation, no matter how captivating, does not equate to causation. After all, it's like mistaking the shimmer of a Northern Light for a mere street lamp.

Therefore, in the spirit of scientific inquiry mingled with levity, we bid adieu to this curious correlation, acknowledging the need for further exploration into the whimsical ways of digital influence and the peculiar pull of Canadian dreams. Despite the allure of delving deeper into this enchanting enigma, we assert that no more research is needed in this area, as this finding stands as a testament to the delightful peculiarities that underlie statistical analysis and the comical complexity of human curiosity. So, as we eagerly await the next intriguing dance between digital trends, we leave this peculiar pairing to the realm of wonderfully weird research findings.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Tangoing with Tom: Total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the Trend of 'Travelling to Toronto' in Google searches. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Online Culture and Internet Trends


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Tangoing with Tom: Total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the Trend of 'Travelling to Toronto' in Google searches. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Internet Culture and Trend Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Tangoing with Tom: Total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the Trend of 'Travelling to Toronto' in Google searches with an abstract of Traversing the digital landscape, we set our sights on unraveling the enigmatic connection between the total views on Tom Scott's tantalizing YouTube videos and the trend of 'how to immigrate to Canada' Google searches. With a skip in our step and data in hand, we delved into the depths of YouTube and Google Trends to scrutinize this peculiar pairing. Our findings unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9024189, beckoning us to ponder whether there's an undercover Canadian immigration campaign lurking in the witty world of Tom Scott's videos. This quirky correlation, with p < 0.01, left us envisaging a world where the allure of Canada and the allure of YouTube collided in a comical, clandestine courtship. So, if you find yourself binge-watching Tom Scott and suddenly searching for maple syrup and moose sightings, just remember, the correlation may not be causation, but it sure makes for a 'wonderfully weird' research finding!

ChatGPT:

Tom Scott, YouTube videos, total views, Trend of 'Travelling to Toronto', Google searches, correlation coefficient, 'how to immigrate to Canada', Google Trends, Canadian immigration campaign, correlation vs causation, YouTube viewership, online search behavior

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos
Detailed data title: Total views on Tom Scott YouTube videos.
Source: Tom Scott's YouTube
Additional Info: Current total views of videos released that year.

See what else correlates with Total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos

Google searches for 'how to immigrate to canada'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'how to immigrate to canada' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'how to immigrate to canada'

Correlation r = 0.9024189 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8143599 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 81.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'how to immigrate to canada') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos) over the 15 years from 2009 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.2E-6. 0.0000041801095855566100000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.9 in 0.00042% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 239,228 random variables You don't actually need 239 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 14 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 14 because we have two variables measured over a period of 15 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.73, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
Total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos (Total views)19592200165101537358864919047902600121953000117957000136713000162250000220220000168731000254354000185627000158759000117563000
Google searches for 'how to immigrate to canada' (Rel. search volume)17.916720.416721.916719.7523.583325.7522.083331.2528.83333232.166735.583329.833333.666729.5




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([19592200,165101,537358,8649190,47902600,121953000,117957000,136713000,162250000,220220000,168731000,254354000,185627000,158759000,117563000,])
array_2 = np.array([17.9167,20.4167,21.9167,19.75,23.5833,25.75,22.0833,31.25,28.8333,32,32.1667,35.5833,29.8333,33.6667,29.5,])
array_1_name = "Total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'how to immigrate to canada'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is much appreciated!


Correlation ID: 4930 · Black Variable ID: 25467 · Red Variable ID: 1349
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0