Download png, svg
AI explanation
As Tom's views went up, so did the plant productivity in Lithuania, creating a real-leaf effect. As more people tuned in, it sparked a fire within the biomass power industry, proving that when it comes to energy, Tom's channel is a real powerhouse!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a vibrant, surreal landscape exuding a Vaporwave aesthetic. At the center, a sleek YouTube play button with Tom Scott's logo brightly glows, surrounded by a rapidly increasing digital view count. The scene transitions seamlessly to a lush Lithuanian forest, dominated by tall, thriving trees. Within the forest, a bustling biomass power plant hums with activity, its chimneys emitting clean, white smoke that seems to nourish and enrich the surrounding foliage. This visually captures the mesmerizing synergy between Tom's YouTube views and the flourishing productivity of the biomass power industry in Lithuania. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and Biomass power generated in Lithuania. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: inspired by bauhaus Data cyber art Cutsy art illustration Vaporwave Vaporwave
ChatGPT: Vaporwave
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and Biomass power generated in Lithuania, in the following situation: As Tom's views went up, so did the plant productivity in Lithuania, creating a real-leaf effect. As more people tuned in, it sparked a fire within the biomass power industry, proving that when it comes to energy, Tom's channel is a real powerhouse!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the scene, we see a YouTube play button with Tom Scott's logo shining brightly, surrounded by an increasing number of digital views. As the views rise, we see a lush green forest in Lithuania, where a biomass power plant hums with activity. The trees in the forest seem to grow taller and lusher, and the plant's chimneys emit clean white smoke that seems to nourish the surrounding trees and foliage. The scene illustrates a clear connection between Tom's YouTube views and the increased productivity and growth within the biomass power industry in Lithuania.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Vaporwave ] and depicting this scene: In the scene, we see a YouTube play button with Tom Scott's logo shining brightly, surrounded by an increasing number of digital views. As the views rise, we see a lush green forest in Lithuania, where a biomass power plant hums with activity. The trees in the forest seem to grow taller and lusher, and the plant's chimneys emit clean white smoke that seems to nourish the surrounding trees and foliage. The scene illustrates a clear connection between Tom's YouTube views and the increased productivity and growth within the biomass power industry in Lithuania. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a vibrant, surreal landscape exuding a Vaporwave aesthetic. At the center, a sleek YouTube play button with Tom Scott's logo brightly glows, surrounded by a rapidly increasing digital view count. The scene transitions seamlessly to a lush Lithuanian forest, dominated by tall, thriving trees. Within the forest, a bustling biomass power plant hums with activity, its chimneys emitting clean, white smoke that seems to nourish and enrich the surrounding foliage. This visually captures the mesmerizing synergy between Tom's YouTube views and the flourishing productivity of the biomass power industry in Lithuania.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Total views on Tom Scott YouTube videos caused Biomass power generated in Lithuania to increase. Include one good pun.
AI academic paper
The Twisted Tale of Total Tom Scott's Tube Views and Lithuania’s Lively Biomass Power: A Tentative Twosome? The Whimsical Journal of Quirky Research and Curious Discoveries Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on Tom Scott YouTube videos and Biomass power generated in Lithuania. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title an alliteration.
Your research team used data from YouTube and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9602649 and p < 0.01 for 2009 to 2021.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Twisted Tale of Total Tom Scott's Tube Views and Lithuania’s Lively Biomass Power: A Tentative Twosome?
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the twisted tale of the total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the production of biomass power in Lithuania, aiming to untangle the potential tentativeness of a twosome between these seemingly disparate entities. Using data from YouTube and the Energy Information Administration, we sought to shed light on this unlikely duo. Our analysis uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9602649 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2009 to 2021. The findings of this study, while raising eyebrows, may hint at a peculiar connection between internet users' interest in educational content and renewable energy sources. This research opens the door to a new realm of exploration, where the whimsical world of online viewership intertwines with the invigorating industry of bioenergy.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on Tom Scott YouTube videos and Biomass power generated in Lithuania. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Twisted Tale of Total Tom Scott's Tube Views and Lithuania’s Lively Biomass Power: A Tentative Twosome?
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the twisted tale of the total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the production of biomass power in Lithuania, aiming to untangle the potential tentativeness of a twosome between these seemingly disparate entities. Using data from YouTube and the Energy Information Administration, we sought to shed light on this unlikely duo. Our analysis uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9602649 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2009 to 2021. The findings of this study, while raising eyebrows, may hint at a peculiar connection between internet users' interest in educational content and renewable energy sources. This research opens the door to a new realm of exploration, where the whimsical world of online viewership intertwines with the invigorating industry of bioenergy.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
The intriguing interplay between seemingly unrelated phenomena has long captivated the curiosity of researchers across various disciplines. In the realm of social media, the popularity of content creators can wield unexpected influence, while the field of renewable energy presents a landscape of innovation and potential. Our study delves into the uncharted territory where these two worlds collide, exploring the connection between the total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the generation of biomass power in Lithuania. This endeavor, while initially met with skepticism and raised eyebrows, has unearthed a formidable correlation between these seemingly disparate variables.
As we embark on this exploratory journey, it is imperative to recognize the inherent quirkiness and unpredictability of the digital age, where an individual's musings and meanderings through the vast expanse of the internet can yield unexpected repercussions. The labyrinthine algorithmic intricacies of YouTube, coupled with the capricious nature of viewers' preferences, provide an enigmatic backdrop against which we seek to unravel the interwoven nature of online viewership and the production of biomass power.
Furthermore, the realm of renewable energy, with its undercurrents of sustainability and ecological conscientiousness, presents a strikingly divergent context. The rhythmic hum of biomass power production serves as a pulsating heartbeat, propelling Lithuania toward a greener, more sustainable future. The juxtaposition of this burgeoning industry with the esoteric world of online viewership generates a curious juxtaposition that demands thorough investigation.
Thus, the confluence of these divergent domains mandates a critical examination of the potential correlation between total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the generation of biomass power in Lithuania. Through the rigorous analysis of empirical data, we endeavor to corroborate this unexpected relationship and shed light on a hitherto unexplored linkage between the virtual realm of digital content consumption and the tangible realm of renewable energy production.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on Tom Scott YouTube videos and Biomass power generated in Lithuania. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Twisted Tale of Total Tom Scott's Tube Views and Lithuania’s Lively Biomass Power: A Tentative Twosome?
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the twisted tale of the total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the production of biomass power in Lithuania, aiming to untangle the potential tentativeness of a twosome between these seemingly disparate entities. Using data from YouTube and the Energy Information Administration, we sought to shed light on this unlikely duo. Our analysis uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9602649 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2009 to 2021. The findings of this study, while raising eyebrows, may hint at a peculiar connection between internet users' interest in educational content and renewable energy sources. This research opens the door to a new realm of exploration, where the whimsical world of online viewership intertwines with the invigorating industry of bioenergy.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intriguing interplay between seemingly unrelated phenomena has long captivated the curiosity of researchers across various disciplines. In the realm of social media, the popularity of content creators can wield unexpected influence, while the field of renewable energy presents a landscape of innovation and potential. Our study delves into the uncharted territory where these two worlds collide, exploring the connection between the total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the generation of biomass power in Lithuania. This endeavor, while initially met with skepticism and raised eyebrows, has unearthed a formidable correlation between these seemingly disparate variables.
As we embark on this exploratory journey, it is imperative to recognize the inherent quirkiness and unpredictability of the digital age, where an individual's musings and meanderings through the vast expanse of the internet can yield unexpected repercussions. The labyrinthine algorithmic intricacies of YouTube, coupled with the capricious nature of viewers' preferences, provide an enigmatic backdrop against which we seek to unravel the interwoven nature of online viewership and the production of biomass power.
Furthermore, the realm of renewable energy, with its undercurrents of sustainability and ecological conscientiousness, presents a strikingly divergent context. The rhythmic hum of biomass power production serves as a pulsating heartbeat, propelling Lithuania toward a greener, more sustainable future. The juxtaposition of this burgeoning industry with the esoteric world of online viewership generates a curious juxtaposition that demands thorough investigation.
Thus, the confluence of these divergent domains mandates a critical examination of the potential correlation between total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the generation of biomass power in Lithuania. Through the rigorous analysis of empirical data, we endeavor to corroborate this unexpected relationship and shed light on a hitherto unexplored linkage between the virtual realm of digital content consumption and the tangible realm of renewable energy production.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find a strong positive correlation between online viewership of educational content and interest in renewable energy sources. Conversely, in "Doe et al.," the findings suggest a tenuous association that does not reach statistical significance. Moreover, in "Jones et al.," the results indicate a potential relationship worthy of further investigation.
Turning to relevant literature, "The Biomass Power Plant Handbook" by Mark Diesendorf provides a comprehensive overview of biomass power generation, highlighting its potential for sustainable energy production. Similarly, "YouTube for Dummies" by Doug Sahlin and Chris Botello offers insights into the world of online content creation and viewership dynamics. Pivoting toward fiction, the science fiction novel "The Energetic Adventures of Tom Scott and the Biomass Crusaders" presents an imaginative narrative intertwining YouTube stardom with the quest for renewable energy.
As the authors traverse the whimsical world of online viewership and the invigorating industry of bioenergy, the exploration of connections extends to unconventional sources of insight. An unexpected source that emerged in the pursuit of untangling this mysterious twosome is the animated series "Captain Planet and the Planeteers," shedding light on the importance of environmental consciousness and renewable energy through the lens of 1990s Saturday morning cartoons. Delving deeper into the realm of childhood nostalgia, "The Magic School Bus" offers a lighthearted yet educational perspective on scientific concepts, potentially laying the groundwork for future research angles.
Unconventional sources aside, the authors strive to methodically unravel the entwined tale of online viewership and biomass power generation, while nodding to the distinct peculiarities and potential absurdities that underscore this unexpected coupling.
This review of literature, while layering serious findings with whimsical indulgences, serves as a foundation for the interdisciplinary exploration of the potential linkage between the total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the production of biomass power in Lithuania.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on Tom Scott YouTube videos and Biomass power generated in Lithuania. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from YouTube and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2009 to 2021
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Twisted Tale of Total Tom Scott's Tube Views and Lithuania’s Lively Biomass Power: A Tentative Twosome?
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the twisted tale of the total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the production of biomass power in Lithuania, aiming to untangle the potential tentativeness of a twosome between these seemingly disparate entities. Using data from YouTube and the Energy Information Administration, we sought to shed light on this unlikely duo. Our analysis uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9602649 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2009 to 2021. The findings of this study, while raising eyebrows, may hint at a peculiar connection between internet users' interest in educational content and renewable energy sources. This research opens the door to a new realm of exploration, where the whimsical world of online viewership intertwines with the invigorating industry of bioenergy.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intriguing interplay between seemingly unrelated phenomena has long captivated the curiosity of researchers across various disciplines. In the realm of social media, the popularity of content creators can wield unexpected influence, while the field of renewable energy presents a landscape of innovation and potential. Our study delves into the uncharted territory where these two worlds collide, exploring the connection between the total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the generation of biomass power in Lithuania. This endeavor, while initially met with skepticism and raised eyebrows, has unearthed a formidable correlation between these seemingly disparate variables.
As we embark on this exploratory journey, it is imperative to recognize the inherent quirkiness and unpredictability of the digital age, where an individual's musings and meanderings through the vast expanse of the internet can yield unexpected repercussions. The labyrinthine algorithmic intricacies of YouTube, coupled with the capricious nature of viewers' preferences, provide an enigmatic backdrop against which we seek to unravel the interwoven nature of online viewership and the production of biomass power.
Furthermore, the realm of renewable energy, with its undercurrents of sustainability and ecological conscientiousness, presents a strikingly divergent context. The rhythmic hum of biomass power production serves as a pulsating heartbeat, propelling Lithuania toward a greener, more sustainable future. The juxtaposition of this burgeoning industry with the esoteric world of online viewership generates a curious juxtaposition that demands thorough investigation.
Thus, the confluence of these divergent domains mandates a critical examination of the potential correlation between total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the generation of biomass power in Lithuania. Through the rigorous analysis of empirical data, we endeavor to corroborate this unexpected relationship and shed light on a hitherto unexplored linkage between the virtual realm of digital content consumption and the tangible realm of renewable energy production.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Data Collection:
The present investigation adopted a comprehensive approach to data collection, drawing from diverse sources that epitomize the perplexing amalgamation of online viewership and biomass power generation. Primary data were sourced from the ubiquitous platform of YouTube, with a fervent emphasis on aggregating the total views of Tom Scott's prodigious repertoire of educational and insightful videos. The timeline for this data extended from 2009 to 2021, encompassing a wide expanse of the digital epoch and allowing for a deep dive into the annals of virtual engagement.
In parallel, secondary data were culled from the Energy Information Administration, capturing the ebbs and flows of biomass power generation in the vibrant landscape of Lithuania. This multifaceted approach aimed to encapsulate the fervent dynamism of both online viewers' interactions with intellectual expositions and the robust endeavors in harnessing renewable energy within a specific geographical context.
Data Processing and Analysis:
The amassed data from YouTube and the Energy Information Administration underwent a meticulous process of data purification and harmonization, where outliers and anomalies were exorcised with the resolute determination of a meticulous curator. Through a seamless symphony of data handling techniques, the research team harmonized the disparate datasets, aligning them along the temporal axis to enable a convergence of insights.
With the sanctity of statistical rigor as their guiding star, the researchers calculated the correlation coefficient between the total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the biomass power generated in Lithuania. This endeavor, fraught with the unpredictability reminiscent of a David and Goliath joust, yielded a sizzling correlation coefficient of 0.9602649. With a p-value that glittered with statistical significance, clocking in at less than 0.01, the team found themselves at the zenith of empirical validation.
Correlation Extrapolation:
The prodigious correlation coefficient birthed a gleaming horizon of potential insights, beckoning the research team to undertake a journey of correlation extrapolation. With cautious optimism and a sprinkling of requisite whimsy, the team explored the implications of this unexpected nexus between online viewership and the energetic effervescence of biomass power generation in Lithuania. The unfurling panorama of implications beckons further exploration, eco-ing with a resounding invitation for diligent scholarly endeavor.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on Tom Scott YouTube videos and Biomass power generated in Lithuania. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from YouTube and Energy Information Administration .
For the time period 2009 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9602649, r-squared of 0.9221087, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Twisted Tale of Total Tom Scott's Tube Views and Lithuania’s Lively Biomass Power: A Tentative Twosome?
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the twisted tale of the total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the production of biomass power in Lithuania, aiming to untangle the potential tentativeness of a twosome between these seemingly disparate entities. Using data from YouTube and the Energy Information Administration, we sought to shed light on this unlikely duo. Our analysis uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9602649 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2009 to 2021. The findings of this study, while raising eyebrows, may hint at a peculiar connection between internet users' interest in educational content and renewable energy sources. This research opens the door to a new realm of exploration, where the whimsical world of online viewership intertwines with the invigorating industry of bioenergy.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intriguing interplay between seemingly unrelated phenomena has long captivated the curiosity of researchers across various disciplines. In the realm of social media, the popularity of content creators can wield unexpected influence, while the field of renewable energy presents a landscape of innovation and potential. Our study delves into the uncharted territory where these two worlds collide, exploring the connection between the total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the generation of biomass power in Lithuania. This endeavor, while initially met with skepticism and raised eyebrows, has unearthed a formidable correlation between these seemingly disparate variables.
As we embark on this exploratory journey, it is imperative to recognize the inherent quirkiness and unpredictability of the digital age, where an individual's musings and meanderings through the vast expanse of the internet can yield unexpected repercussions. The labyrinthine algorithmic intricacies of YouTube, coupled with the capricious nature of viewers' preferences, provide an enigmatic backdrop against which we seek to unravel the interwoven nature of online viewership and the production of biomass power.
Furthermore, the realm of renewable energy, with its undercurrents of sustainability and ecological conscientiousness, presents a strikingly divergent context. The rhythmic hum of biomass power production serves as a pulsating heartbeat, propelling Lithuania toward a greener, more sustainable future. The juxtaposition of this burgeoning industry with the esoteric world of online viewership generates a curious juxtaposition that demands thorough investigation.
Thus, the confluence of these divergent domains mandates a critical examination of the potential correlation between total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the generation of biomass power in Lithuania. Through the rigorous analysis of empirical data, we endeavor to corroborate this unexpected relationship and shed light on a hitherto unexplored linkage between the virtual realm of digital content consumption and the tangible realm of renewable energy production.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9602649 between the total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the production of biomass power in Lithuania during the period from 2009 to 2021. This finding suggests a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables, prompting us to ponder the intertwined nature of online viewership and the generation of renewable energy.
Moreover, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.9221087 indicates that a substantial proportion of the variability in biomass power generated in Lithuania can be explained by the total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos. This unexpected robustness of the relationship adds an intriguing layer to our understanding of the potential influence of educational content consumption on the renewable energy landscape.
The statistical significance of the correlation is underscored by the p-value of less than 0.01, further affirming the compelling association between these divergent phenomena. The remote likelihood of this correlation occurring by chance suggests that there may be underlying dynamics at play, perhaps hinting at a curious interplay between digital content consumption and environmental consciousness.
The visual representation of the relationship is encapsulated in Fig. 1, a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the remarkably strong correlation between the total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the production of biomass power in Lithuania. The unmistakable clustering of data points along a discernible trendline serves as a compelling visual testament to the surprising connection unearthed by this study.
These intriguing findings prompt us to contemplate the potential implications of this unlikely duo, as well as to delve further into the whimsical interplay of digital content consumption and the dynamics of sustainable energy production. The implications of this research extend beyond the confines of traditional academic inquiry, inviting a thoughtful reflection on the intricate and often unforeseen relationships that underpin our modern, interconnected world.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on Tom Scott YouTube videos and Biomass power generated in Lithuania. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
The Twisted Tale of Total Tom Scott's Tube Views and Lithuania’s Lively Biomass Power: A Tentative Twosome?
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the twisted tale of the total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the production of biomass power in Lithuania, aiming to untangle the potential tentativeness of a twosome between these seemingly disparate entities. Using data from YouTube and the Energy Information Administration, we sought to shed light on this unlikely duo. Our analysis uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9602649 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2009 to 2021. The findings of this study, while raising eyebrows, may hint at a peculiar connection between internet users' interest in educational content and renewable energy sources. This research opens the door to a new realm of exploration, where the whimsical world of online viewership intertwines with the invigorating industry of bioenergy.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find a strong positive correlation between online viewership of educational content and interest in renewable energy sources. Conversely, in "Doe et al.," the findings suggest a tenuous association that does not reach statistical significance. Moreover, in "Jones et al.," the results indicate a potential relationship worthy of further investigation.
Turning to relevant literature, "The Biomass Power Plant Handbook" by Mark Diesendorf provides a comprehensive overview of biomass power generation, highlighting its potential for sustainable energy production. Similarly, "YouTube for Dummies" by Doug Sahlin and Chris Botello offers insights into the world of online content creation and viewership dynamics. Pivoting toward fiction, the science fiction novel "The Energetic Adventures of Tom Scott and the Biomass Crusaders" presents an imaginative narrative intertwining YouTube stardom with the quest for renewable energy.
As the authors traverse the whimsical world of online viewership and the invigorating industry of bioenergy, the exploration of connections extends to unconventional sources of insight. An unexpected source that emerged in the pursuit of untangling this mysterious twosome is the animated series "Captain Planet and the Planeteers," shedding light on the importance of environmental consciousness and renewable energy through the lens of 1990s Saturday morning cartoons. Delving deeper into the realm of childhood nostalgia, "The Magic School Bus" offers a lighthearted yet educational perspective on scientific concepts, potentially laying the groundwork for future research angles.
Unconventional sources aside, the authors strive to methodically unravel the entwined tale of online viewership and biomass power generation, while nodding to the distinct peculiarities and potential absurdities that underscore this unexpected coupling.
This review of literature, while layering serious findings with whimsical indulgences, serves as a foundation for the interdisciplinary exploration of the potential linkage between the total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the production of biomass power in Lithuania.
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9602649 between the total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the production of biomass power in Lithuania during the period from 2009 to 2021. This finding suggests a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables, prompting us to ponder the intertwined nature of online viewership and the generation of renewable energy.
Moreover, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.9221087 indicates that a substantial proportion of the variability in biomass power generated in Lithuania can be explained by the total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos. This unexpected robustness of the relationship adds an intriguing layer to our understanding of the potential influence of educational content consumption on the renewable energy landscape.
The statistical significance of the correlation is underscored by the p-value of less than 0.01, further affirming the compelling association between these divergent phenomena. The remote likelihood of this correlation occurring by chance suggests that there may be underlying dynamics at play, perhaps hinting at a curious interplay between digital content consumption and environmental consciousness.
The visual representation of the relationship is encapsulated in Fig. 1, a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the remarkably strong correlation between the total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the production of biomass power in Lithuania. The unmistakable clustering of data points along a discernible trendline serves as a compelling visual testament to the surprising connection unearthed by this study.
These intriguing findings prompt us to contemplate the potential implications of this unlikely duo, as well as to delve further into the whimsical interplay of digital content consumption and the dynamics of sustainable energy production. The implications of this research extend beyond the confines of traditional academic inquiry, inviting a thoughtful reflection on the intricate and often unforeseen relationships that underpin our modern, interconnected world.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The findings of our study have unraveled a peculiar and unexpected relationship between the total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the production of biomass power in Lithuania. This unlikely duo, which may initially raise eyebrows, is supported by previous research suggesting a potential association between online viewership of educational content and interest in renewable energy sources. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9602649 and the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 provide empirical evidence for the interconnectedness of these seemingly disparate variables.
Our results align with the previous work of Smith et al., who also found a strong positive correlation between online viewership of educational content and interest in renewable energy sources. While "Captain Planet and the Planeteers" may have seemed like an unconventional source of insight in our literature review, the animated series' emphasis on environmental consciousness and renewable energy takes on a newfound relevance in light of our findings. Additionally, our study's linkage between online viewership and biomass power generation unexpectedly aligns with the whimsical storyline of "The Energetic Adventures of Tom Scott and the Biomass Crusaders," illustrating the potential for reality to mirror fiction in unexpected ways.
The substantial proportion of the variability in biomass power generated in Lithuania being explained by the total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos (as indicated by the coefficient of determination) adds a layer of robustness to the identified relationship. The humorous undertones of the fictional literature in our review are seemingly echoed in our substantial statistical findings, further blurring the lines between seriousness and whimsy in the pursuit of scientific inquiry.
The visual representation of the remarkably strong correlation in our scatterplot (Fig. 1) serves as a compelling testament to the surprising nature of this connection. The unmistakable clustering of data points along a discernible trendline sparks a reflection on the potential unpredictability and serendipitous nature of research outcomes. As the lighthearted yet educational perspective of "The Magic School Bus" is discussed in our literature review, it seems fitting to humorously contemplate the fortuitous "magic" behind the unexpected strength of our identified relationship.
This study’s implications may extend beyond the conventional boundaries of academic inquiry, inviting further exploration of the whimsical interplay between digital content consumption and the dynamics of sustainable energy production. Our findings underscore the intricate and often unforeseen relationships that underpin our modern, interconnected world, reminding us all that even in the world of statistical measurements and serious research, there is room for a touch of the unexpected and whimsy.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Total views on Tom Scott YouTube videos and Biomass power generated in Lithuania. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Twisted Tale of Total Tom Scott's Tube Views and Lithuania’s Lively Biomass Power: A Tentative Twosome?
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the twisted tale of the total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the production of biomass power in Lithuania, aiming to untangle the potential tentativeness of a twosome between these seemingly disparate entities. Using data from YouTube and the Energy Information Administration, we sought to shed light on this unlikely duo. Our analysis uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9602649 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2009 to 2021. The findings of this study, while raising eyebrows, may hint at a peculiar connection between internet users' interest in educational content and renewable energy sources. This research opens the door to a new realm of exploration, where the whimsical world of online viewership intertwines with the invigorating industry of bioenergy.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intriguing interplay between seemingly unrelated phenomena has long captivated the curiosity of researchers across various disciplines. In the realm of social media, the popularity of content creators can wield unexpected influence, while the field of renewable energy presents a landscape of innovation and potential. Our study delves into the uncharted territory where these two worlds collide, exploring the connection between the total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the generation of biomass power in Lithuania. This endeavor, while initially met with skepticism and raised eyebrows, has unearthed a formidable correlation between these seemingly disparate variables.
As we embark on this exploratory journey, it is imperative to recognize the inherent quirkiness and unpredictability of the digital age, where an individual's musings and meanderings through the vast expanse of the internet can yield unexpected repercussions. The labyrinthine algorithmic intricacies of YouTube, coupled with the capricious nature of viewers' preferences, provide an enigmatic backdrop against which we seek to unravel the interwoven nature of online viewership and the production of biomass power.
Furthermore, the realm of renewable energy, with its undercurrents of sustainability and ecological conscientiousness, presents a strikingly divergent context. The rhythmic hum of biomass power production serves as a pulsating heartbeat, propelling Lithuania toward a greener, more sustainable future. The juxtaposition of this burgeoning industry with the esoteric world of online viewership generates a curious juxtaposition that demands thorough investigation.
Thus, the confluence of these divergent domains mandates a critical examination of the potential correlation between total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the generation of biomass power in Lithuania. Through the rigorous analysis of empirical data, we endeavor to corroborate this unexpected relationship and shed light on a hitherto unexplored linkage between the virtual realm of digital content consumption and the tangible realm of renewable energy production.
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9602649 between the total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the production of biomass power in Lithuania during the period from 2009 to 2021. This finding suggests a remarkably strong relationship between these seemingly incongruous variables, prompting us to ponder the intertwined nature of online viewership and the generation of renewable energy.
Moreover, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.9221087 indicates that a substantial proportion of the variability in biomass power generated in Lithuania can be explained by the total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos. This unexpected robustness of the relationship adds an intriguing layer to our understanding of the potential influence of educational content consumption on the renewable energy landscape.
The statistical significance of the correlation is underscored by the p-value of less than 0.01, further affirming the compelling association between these divergent phenomena. The remote likelihood of this correlation occurring by chance suggests that there may be underlying dynamics at play, perhaps hinting at a curious interplay between digital content consumption and environmental consciousness.
The visual representation of the relationship is encapsulated in Fig. 1, a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the remarkably strong correlation between the total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the production of biomass power in Lithuania. The unmistakable clustering of data points along a discernible trendline serves as a compelling visual testament to the surprising connection unearthed by this study.
These intriguing findings prompt us to contemplate the potential implications of this unlikely duo, as well as to delve further into the whimsical interplay of digital content consumption and the dynamics of sustainable energy production. The implications of this research extend beyond the confines of traditional academic inquiry, inviting a thoughtful reflection on the intricate and often unforeseen relationships that underpin our modern, interconnected world.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, the findings of this study offer a tantalizing glimpse into the interconnected web of digital content consumption and the realm of renewable energy production. The striking correlation coefficient of 0.9602649 starkly shines a light on the unexpected relationship between the total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the generation of biomass power in Lithuania. It seems that Scott's endeavors have sparked an energizing effect on Lithuania's bioenergy landscape, creating a palpable buzz in the sphere of sustainable power production.
The substantial r-squared value of 0.9221087 tickles our statistical fancies, indicating that a lion's share of the variability in biomass power generated in Lithuania can be spiritedly elucidated by the total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos. This robust relationship, although initially met with raised eyebrows and bemused chuckles, defies the conventional understanding of causal links between digital content consumption and environmental conscientiousness.
The palpable visual representation in Fig. 1 makes it resoundingly clear that the data points are not just idly wandering, but rather enthusiastically clustering along a discernible trendline, culminating in a visual symphony of statistical significance. This evidence tantalizingly suggests that there may be more to this connection than meets the eye, beckoning researchers to embark on a twin expedition of jaw-dropping data analysis and wry pun-making.
While this study has shed light on the unexpected tether between Tom Scott's ubiquitous presence and Lithuania's effervescent bioenergy sector, it is imperative to recognize the limitations of this research. The complex interplay between online viewership and renewable energy production is a textured tapestry that requires further exploration, but it is fair to say that this study has certainly ignited a spark of curiosity in the academic community.
In the grand tradition of inquiry, it is our scholarly duty to insist that no further research is needed in this particular area. For we have surely exhausted this topic to its most rambunctious extent, and any subsequent study would merely be spinning its wheels. With a jest in our heart and a flourish of statistical significance, we bid adieu to this inexplicably charming twosome of Tom Scott's Tube Views and Lithuania's Lively Biomass Power, content in the quirky, unanticipated connections it has unveiled.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Twisted Tale of Total Tom Scott's Tube Views and Lithuania’s Lively Biomass Power: A Tentative Twosome?. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Whimsical Journal of Quirky Research and Curious Discoveries
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Twisted Tale of Total Tom Scott's Tube Views and Lithuania’s Lively Biomass Power: A Tentative Twosome?. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Institute for Eclectic Energy Economics and Entertaining Enigmas
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Twisted Tale of Total Tom Scott's Tube Views and Lithuania’s Lively Biomass Power: A Tentative Twosome? with an abstract of This study examines the twisted tale of the total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos and the production of biomass power in Lithuania, aiming to untangle the potential tentativeness of a twosome between these seemingly disparate entities. Using data from YouTube and the Energy Information Administration, we sought to shed light on this unlikely duo. Our analysis uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9602649 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2009 to 2021. The findings of this study, while raising eyebrows, may hint at a peculiar connection between internet users' interest in educational content and renewable energy sources. This research opens the door to a new realm of exploration, where the whimsical world of online viewership intertwines with the invigorating industry of bioenergy.
ChatGPT:
Tom Scott, YouTube views, biomass power, Lithuania, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, educational content, renewable energy sources, online viewership, bioenergy industry, data analysis
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videosDetailed data title: Total views on Tom Scott YouTube videos.
Source: Tom Scott's YouTube
Additional Info: Current total views of videos released that year.
See what else correlates with Total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos
Biomass power generated in Lithuania
Detailed data title: Total biomass power generated in Lithuania in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Biomass power generated in Lithuania
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.9221087 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 92.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Biomass power generated in Lithuania) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos) over the 13 years from 2009 through 2021.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.9E-7. 0.0000001947159632281653000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.96 in 1.9E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 5,135,686 random variables You don't actually need 5 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 12 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 12 because we have two variables measured over a period of 13 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.87, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | |
Total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos (Total views) | 19592200 | 165101 | 537358 | 8649190 | 47902600 | 121953000 | 117957000 | 136713000 | 162250000 | 220220000 | 168731000 | 254354000 | 185627000 |
Biomass power generated in Lithuania (Billion kWh) | 0.102 | 0.147 | 0.157 | 0.218 | 0.383 | 0.443 | 0.507 | 0.543 | 0.587 | 0.628 | 0.619 | 0.73 | 0.695047 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([19592200,165101,537358,8649190,47902600,121953000,117957000,136713000,162250000,220220000,168731000,254354000,185627000,])
array_2 = np.array([0.102,0.147,0.157,0.218,0.383,0.443,0.507,0.543,0.587,0.628,0.619,0.73,0.695047,])
array_1_name = "Total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos"
array_2_name = "Biomass power generated in Lithuania"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Total views on Tom Scott's YouTube videos
- Line chart for only Biomass power generated in Lithuania
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: The Twisted Tale of Total Tom Scott's Tube Views and Lithuania’s Lively Biomass Power: A Tentative Twosome?
I'm genuinely thankful for your rating!
Correlation ID: 5699 · Black Variable ID: 25467 · Red Variable ID: 23796