Report an error
Wind power generated in Norway correlates with...
| Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
| Average length of Mark Rober YouTube videos | r=0.99 | 11yrs | Yes! |
| Organic Food Sales Volume in the United States | r=0.98 | 13yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Sonny | r=0.98 | 30yrs | Yes! |
| Lululemon's stock price (LULU) | r=0.98 | 14yrs | No |
| Amazon.com's stock price (AMZN) | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
| Apple's stock price (AAPL) | r=0.97 | 20yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Walker | r=0.96 | 30yrs | No |
| Google searches for 'do vaccines work' | r=0.96 | 18yrs | No |
| Number of websites on the internet | r=0.95 | 27yrs | Yes! |
| Sales of LP/Vinyl Albums | r=0.95 | 29yrs | No |
| Walmart's stock price (WMT) | r=0.95 | 20yrs | No |
| Popularity of the first name Astrid | r=0.95 | 30yrs | No |
| NVIDIA's stock price (NVDA) | r=0.93 | 20yrs | No |
| The number of Breweries in the United States | r=0.9 | 30yrs | Yes! |
Wind power generated in Norway also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)