Download png, svg
AI explanation
As the number of breweries in the United States increases, so does the production of beer. With more beer available, people tend to have a gassier diet, leading to an increase in flatulence. This rise in gaseous emissions creates a higher demand for wind power in Norway to offset the increased methane and carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere. This in turn drives the expansion of wind farms and boosts the overall production of wind power in Norway. So, next time you crack open a cold one, just remember, you're also contributing to the winds of change in Norway!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image with a nostalgic comic-book style, using muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s. Depict a scene where a growing number of breweries across the United States are shown, each producing more beer and leading to an increase in discarded glass bottles. With the sunlight passing through these bottles, create a shimmering effect, reflecting extra sunlight towards Norway. Illustrate the increase in sunlight leading to better wind patterns, ultimately boosting the production of wind power in Norway. Keep the visual depiction simple, without including any words or speech bubbles. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of Breweries in the United States and Wind power generated in Norway. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Voxel art A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Woodblock painting Cute 2D animation High-tech
ChatGPT: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of Breweries in the United States and Wind power generated in Norway, in the following situation: Because as the number of breweries in the United States increased, so did the demand for beer. This led to an increase in the production of beer, resulting in more discarded beer bottles. These glass bottles, when thrown away, create a shimmering effect as sunlight passes through them, which inadvertently increased the reflection of sunlight towards Norway. As a result, the increase in sunlight led to better wind patterns, ultimately boosting wind power generated in Norway.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Imagine a growing number of breweries across the United States, each producing more beer and leading to an increase in discarded glass bottles. As the sunlight passes through these bottles, they create a shimmering effect, reflecting extra sunlight towards Norway. This increase in sunlight leads to better wind patterns, ultimately boosting the production of wind power in Norway.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s ] and depicting this scene: Imagine a growing number of breweries across the United States, each producing more beer and leading to an increase in discarded glass bottles. As the sunlight passes through these bottles, they create a shimmering effect, reflecting extra sunlight towards Norway. This increase in sunlight leads to better wind patterns, ultimately boosting the production of wind power in Norway. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image with a nostalgic comic-book style, using muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s. Depict a scene where a growing number of breweries across the United States are shown, each producing more beer and leading to an increase in discarded glass bottles. With the sunlight passing through these bottles, create a shimmering effect, reflecting extra sunlight towards Norway. Illustrate the increase in sunlight leading to better wind patterns, ultimately boosting the production of wind power in Norway. Keep the visual depiction simple, without including any words or speech bubbles.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of Breweries in the United States caused Wind power generated in Norway to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.
AI academic paper
Brew and Renew: Inebriated Winds or Evaporated Energy? The Journal of Intoxication Studies Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of Breweries in the United States and Wind power generated in Norway. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title a clever pun.
Your research team used data from Brewers Association and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9010866 and p < 0.01 for 1992 to 2021.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Brew and Renew: Inebriated Winds or Evaporated Energy?
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the surprising correlation between the number of breweries in the United States and the wind power generated in Norway. Drawing on data from the Brewers Association and the Energy Information Administration spanning from 1992 to 2021, our research team identified a correlation coefficient of 0.9010866 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. While this finding may seem as frothy as a freshly poured pint, our analysis reveals a potential link between the proliferation of breweries and the generation of wind power. This intriguing relationship prompts further investigation into the interconnectedness of global energy patterns and the imbibing preferences of individuals. Our findings highlight the importance of considering both climate conditions and cultural trends in the pursuit of sustainable energy solutions.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of Breweries in the United States and Wind power generated in Norway. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Brew and Renew: Inebriated Winds or Evaporated Energy?
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the surprising correlation between the number of breweries in the United States and the wind power generated in Norway. Drawing on data from the Brewers Association and the Energy Information Administration spanning from 1992 to 2021, our research team identified a correlation coefficient of 0.9010866 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. While this finding may seem as frothy as a freshly poured pint, our analysis reveals a potential link between the proliferation of breweries and the generation of wind power. This intriguing relationship prompts further investigation into the interconnectedness of global energy patterns and the imbibing preferences of individuals. Our findings highlight the importance of considering both climate conditions and cultural trends in the pursuit of sustainable energy solutions.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of renewable energy, the pursuit of sustainable and efficient power sources has led researchers and policymakers to explore unusual and unexpected correlations. As the world grapples with the challenges of climate change, scientists are casting a wider net, seeking insights from unconventional sources. One such curious correlation that has piqued the interest of our research team is the unlikely relationship between the number of breweries in the United States and the wind power generated in Norway. At first blush, one might assume this connection to be as fleeting as a passing zephyr, but our analysis has uncovered a significant and robust association that demands further scrutiny.
The landscape of energy production is often perceived as a stark and serious domain, devoid of the whimsy and conviviality found in the world of craft brewing. However, our investigation has revealed a surprising confluence of these seemingly disparate realms. With the brewers on one side, concocting their amber elixirs, and wind turbines whirling on the Norwegian fjords on the other, our study seeks to unravel the enigmatic ties binding these phenomena together. Could it be that the effervescent spirit of beer brewing somehow carries over to the generation of wind power in distant lands? Or perhaps there exists an unseen force, akin to the fermentation process, propelling both industries towards a shared destiny?
Our foray into this uncharted territory of interdisciplinary research was fueled by the recognition that beneath the surface of these distinct industries lies a rich tapestry of variables waiting to be unravelled. While the notion of linking wind power to the revelry of breweries may seem as improbable as a gravity-defying stout, our preliminary findings have unveiled a correlation coefficient that glitters like a freshly polished beer stein. Join us on this academic odyssey as we raise a toast to the unexpected interplay of Brew and Renew: Inebriated Winds or Evaporated Energy?
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of Breweries in the United States and Wind power generated in Norway. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Brew and Renew: Inebriated Winds or Evaporated Energy?
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the surprising correlation between the number of breweries in the United States and the wind power generated in Norway. Drawing on data from the Brewers Association and the Energy Information Administration spanning from 1992 to 2021, our research team identified a correlation coefficient of 0.9010866 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. While this finding may seem as frothy as a freshly poured pint, our analysis reveals a potential link between the proliferation of breweries and the generation of wind power. This intriguing relationship prompts further investigation into the interconnectedness of global energy patterns and the imbibing preferences of individuals. Our findings highlight the importance of considering both climate conditions and cultural trends in the pursuit of sustainable energy solutions.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of renewable energy, the pursuit of sustainable and efficient power sources has led researchers and policymakers to explore unusual and unexpected correlations. As the world grapples with the challenges of climate change, scientists are casting a wider net, seeking insights from unconventional sources. One such curious correlation that has piqued the interest of our research team is the unlikely relationship between the number of breweries in the United States and the wind power generated in Norway. At first blush, one might assume this connection to be as fleeting as a passing zephyr, but our analysis has uncovered a significant and robust association that demands further scrutiny.
The landscape of energy production is often perceived as a stark and serious domain, devoid of the whimsy and conviviality found in the world of craft brewing. However, our investigation has revealed a surprising confluence of these seemingly disparate realms. With the brewers on one side, concocting their amber elixirs, and wind turbines whirling on the Norwegian fjords on the other, our study seeks to unravel the enigmatic ties binding these phenomena together. Could it be that the effervescent spirit of beer brewing somehow carries over to the generation of wind power in distant lands? Or perhaps there exists an unseen force, akin to the fermentation process, propelling both industries towards a shared destiny?
Our foray into this uncharted territory of interdisciplinary research was fueled by the recognition that beneath the surface of these distinct industries lies a rich tapestry of variables waiting to be unravelled. While the notion of linking wind power to the revelry of breweries may seem as improbable as a gravity-defying stout, our preliminary findings have unveiled a correlation coefficient that glitters like a freshly polished beer stein. Join us on this academic odyssey as we raise a toast to the unexpected interplay of Brew and Renew: Inebriated Winds or Evaporated Energy?
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The seminal work of Smith et al. sheds light on the intricacies of renewable energy dynamics, though wind power and the brewing industry were not explicitly examined. However, Doe's analysis of climate conditions and cultural phenomena in "The Nexus of Nature and Nurture" offers a tantalizing glimpse into the complex interplay of environmental factors and human activities. Moreover, Jones' comprehensive study, "Energy Trends and Consumption Patterns," provides a foundational understanding of global energy patterns, laying the groundwork for our exploration of the surprising relationship between breweries and wind power.
Delving into the world of beer brewing, "The Brewmaster's Handbook" by Oliver uncovers the alchemical processes that transform humble ingredients into frothy libations, offering a metaphorical lens through which to contemplate the potential influence of these beverages on atmospheric forces. Meanwhile, "Yeast: The Practical Guide to Beer Fermentation" by White and "Hops and Glory" by Johnson illuminate the multifaceted nature of brewing, serving as a source of inspiration for our investigation into the unforeseen connections between beer and renewable energy.
A departure into the realm of fiction brings intriguing parallels with our research focus. J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire" features a scene at the bustling Three Broomsticks Inn, where magical brews likely conceal potent powers akin to those witnessed in wind power generation. Additionally, the whimsical tales of "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" by Roald Dahl provide a lighthearted lens through which to consider the transformative potential of inventive concoctions, mirroring the innovative spirit of both the brewing and renewable energy spheres.
Reflecting on cinematic narratives, the elegantly swirling landscapes of "The Sound of Music" invite contemplation of the windswept vistas that house the majestically rotating wind turbines – an unexpected parallel between Austrian scenery and Norwegian fjords. Furthermore, the exuberant escapades of "The Secret Life of Walter Mitty" offer a whimsical portrayal of unexpected adventure, mirroring our own academic voyage into the uncharted territory of Brew and Renew.
As we venture beyond the confines of traditional research domains, the perplexing convergence of breweries and wind power beckons us to embrace the unexpected and revel in the unexplored connections that animate our world. With a nod to both the scholarly and the fanciful, our inquiry seeks to uncork the enigmatic ties binding these curious phenomena, inviting further exploration into the interplay of Inebriated Winds or Evaporated Energy.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of Breweries in the United States and Wind power generated in Norway. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Brewers Association and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1992 to 2021
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Brew and Renew: Inebriated Winds or Evaporated Energy?
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the surprising correlation between the number of breweries in the United States and the wind power generated in Norway. Drawing on data from the Brewers Association and the Energy Information Administration spanning from 1992 to 2021, our research team identified a correlation coefficient of 0.9010866 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. While this finding may seem as frothy as a freshly poured pint, our analysis reveals a potential link between the proliferation of breweries and the generation of wind power. This intriguing relationship prompts further investigation into the interconnectedness of global energy patterns and the imbibing preferences of individuals. Our findings highlight the importance of considering both climate conditions and cultural trends in the pursuit of sustainable energy solutions.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of renewable energy, the pursuit of sustainable and efficient power sources has led researchers and policymakers to explore unusual and unexpected correlations. As the world grapples with the challenges of climate change, scientists are casting a wider net, seeking insights from unconventional sources. One such curious correlation that has piqued the interest of our research team is the unlikely relationship between the number of breweries in the United States and the wind power generated in Norway. At first blush, one might assume this connection to be as fleeting as a passing zephyr, but our analysis has uncovered a significant and robust association that demands further scrutiny.
The landscape of energy production is often perceived as a stark and serious domain, devoid of the whimsy and conviviality found in the world of craft brewing. However, our investigation has revealed a surprising confluence of these seemingly disparate realms. With the brewers on one side, concocting their amber elixirs, and wind turbines whirling on the Norwegian fjords on the other, our study seeks to unravel the enigmatic ties binding these phenomena together. Could it be that the effervescent spirit of beer brewing somehow carries over to the generation of wind power in distant lands? Or perhaps there exists an unseen force, akin to the fermentation process, propelling both industries towards a shared destiny?
Our foray into this uncharted territory of interdisciplinary research was fueled by the recognition that beneath the surface of these distinct industries lies a rich tapestry of variables waiting to be unravelled. While the notion of linking wind power to the revelry of breweries may seem as improbable as a gravity-defying stout, our preliminary findings have unveiled a correlation coefficient that glitters like a freshly polished beer stein. Join us on this academic odyssey as we raise a toast to the unexpected interplay of Brew and Renew: Inebriated Winds or Evaporated Energy?
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To unravel the mystifying connection between the proliferation of breweries in the United States and the wind power generated in Norway, our esteemed research team embarked on a quirky journey through the labyrinth of data collection and analysis. The methodology employed in this investigation combined the rigor of statistical analyses with the unbridled curiosity of explorers venturing into uncharted territories.
Initially, we scoured the virtual alehouses of the internet, foraging for data on the number of breweries sprouting across the United States. The Brewers Association served as our primary tap, offering a comprehensive repository of industry data spanning nearly three decades. Armed with this information, we sought to distill the essence of brewery proliferation and discern its potential influence on the far-reaching winds of Norway.
Complementing our beer-soaked quest, the Energy Information Administration stood as the lighthouse guiding our investigation into the windswept energy landscape of Norway. By harnessing the power of online databases, we harnessed oodles of data on wind power generation in Norway from 1992 to 2021, painting a vivid picture of the country's prowess in harnessing Mother Nature's breezy bounty.
With these datasets in hand, we delved into the frothy depths of statistical analyses. Armed with the trusty swords of correlation coefficients and p-values, we sought to uncover the veiled connections between these seemingly unrelated variables. Our voyages through the stormy seas of regression analysis, scatter plots, and trend lines helped chart a course through the tumultuous currents of data, steering us toward the beacon of significance in the form of a p-value less than 0.01 and a correlation coefficient as robust as a sturdy oak beer barrel.
Having emerged from this statistical tempest, we then voyaged into the uncharted waters of qualitative analysis, sifting through historical and cultural narratives to glean insights into the evolving landscapes of brewing and renewable energy. This multidimensional approach allowed us to distill the fermented essence of our findings, revealing a correlation as tantalizing as a well-crafted brew on a hot summer's day.
The culmination of these methodological brews and winds consolidated our investigation into a comprehensive examination of the interconnectedness between brew and renew. Through this interdisciplinary approach, we endeavored to infuse a sense of curiosity and adventure into the typically staid realm of scientific inquiry, proving that even in the serious pursuit of knowledge, there's always room for a frothy twist of fun and whimsy.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of Breweries in the United States and Wind power generated in Norway. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Brewers Association and Energy Information Administration .
For the time period 1992 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9010866, r-squared of 0.8119570, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Brew and Renew: Inebriated Winds or Evaporated Energy?
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the surprising correlation between the number of breweries in the United States and the wind power generated in Norway. Drawing on data from the Brewers Association and the Energy Information Administration spanning from 1992 to 2021, our research team identified a correlation coefficient of 0.9010866 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. While this finding may seem as frothy as a freshly poured pint, our analysis reveals a potential link between the proliferation of breweries and the generation of wind power. This intriguing relationship prompts further investigation into the interconnectedness of global energy patterns and the imbibing preferences of individuals. Our findings highlight the importance of considering both climate conditions and cultural trends in the pursuit of sustainable energy solutions.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the realm of renewable energy, the pursuit of sustainable and efficient power sources has led researchers and policymakers to explore unusual and unexpected correlations. As the world grapples with the challenges of climate change, scientists are casting a wider net, seeking insights from unconventional sources. One such curious correlation that has piqued the interest of our research team is the unlikely relationship between the number of breweries in the United States and the wind power generated in Norway. At first blush, one might assume this connection to be as fleeting as a passing zephyr, but our analysis has uncovered a significant and robust association that demands further scrutiny.
The landscape of energy production is often perceived as a stark and serious domain, devoid of the whimsy and conviviality found in the world of craft brewing. However, our investigation has revealed a surprising confluence of these seemingly disparate realms. With the brewers on one side, concocting their amber elixirs, and wind turbines whirling on the Norwegian fjords on the other, our study seeks to unravel the enigmatic ties binding these phenomena together. Could it be that the effervescent spirit of beer brewing somehow carries over to the generation of wind power in distant lands? Or perhaps there exists an unseen force, akin to the fermentation process, propelling both industries towards a shared destiny?
Our foray into this uncharted territory of interdisciplinary research was fueled by the recognition that beneath the surface of these distinct industries lies a rich tapestry of variables waiting to be unravelled. While the notion of linking wind power to the revelry of breweries may seem as improbable as a gravity-defying stout, our preliminary findings have unveiled a correlation coefficient that glitters like a freshly polished beer stein. Join us on this academic odyssey as we raise a toast to the unexpected interplay of Brew and Renew: Inebriated Winds or Evaporated Energy?
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The correlation coefficient of 0.9010866 between the number of breweries in the United States and the wind power generated in Norway suggests a remarkably strong association, akin to the sturdy structure of a well-crafted beer mug. Our analysis yielded an r-squared value of 0.8119570, indicating that over 81% of the variability in wind power generation in Norway can be explained by the number of breweries in the United States. This finding holds with a p-value of less than 0.01, signifying that the likelihood of this correlation occurring by chance is as rare as finding a four-leaf clover in a barley field.
Fig. 1 depicts the unmistakable relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables, akin to the fusion of hops and malt in a carefully brewed ale. The scatterplot resembles the effervescent bubbles rising in a carbonated beverage, illustrating the upward trend of wind power generation in proportion to the burgeoning count of breweries. The robustness of this correlation dances across the graph like the lively carbonation in a freshly uncorked bottle of beer, leaving little room for doubt regarding the strength of this unexpected bond.
While the idea of a connection between breweries and wind power may elicit a chuckle or a raised eyebrow, our findings underscore the importance of considering unanticipated factors in the realm of energy dynamics. As with the intricate blending of ingredients in a complex brew, our study suggests that the intersection of cultural trends and climatic conditions may have a significant impact on the global landscape of renewable energy. This revelation invites further investigation into the potential mechanisms underlying this correlation, offering a refreshing perspective on the interconnectedness of disparate domains.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of Breweries in the United States and Wind power generated in Norway. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Brew and Renew: Inebriated Winds or Evaporated Energy?
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the surprising correlation between the number of breweries in the United States and the wind power generated in Norway. Drawing on data from the Brewers Association and the Energy Information Administration spanning from 1992 to 2021, our research team identified a correlation coefficient of 0.9010866 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. While this finding may seem as frothy as a freshly poured pint, our analysis reveals a potential link between the proliferation of breweries and the generation of wind power. This intriguing relationship prompts further investigation into the interconnectedness of global energy patterns and the imbibing preferences of individuals. Our findings highlight the importance of considering both climate conditions and cultural trends in the pursuit of sustainable energy solutions.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The seminal work of Smith et al. sheds light on the intricacies of renewable energy dynamics, though wind power and the brewing industry were not explicitly examined. However, Doe's analysis of climate conditions and cultural phenomena in "The Nexus of Nature and Nurture" offers a tantalizing glimpse into the complex interplay of environmental factors and human activities. Moreover, Jones' comprehensive study, "Energy Trends and Consumption Patterns," provides a foundational understanding of global energy patterns, laying the groundwork for our exploration of the surprising relationship between breweries and wind power.
Delving into the world of beer brewing, "The Brewmaster's Handbook" by Oliver uncovers the alchemical processes that transform humble ingredients into frothy libations, offering a metaphorical lens through which to contemplate the potential influence of these beverages on atmospheric forces. Meanwhile, "Yeast: The Practical Guide to Beer Fermentation" by White and "Hops and Glory" by Johnson illuminate the multifaceted nature of brewing, serving as a source of inspiration for our investigation into the unforeseen connections between beer and renewable energy.
A departure into the realm of fiction brings intriguing parallels with our research focus. J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire" features a scene at the bustling Three Broomsticks Inn, where magical brews likely conceal potent powers akin to those witnessed in wind power generation. Additionally, the whimsical tales of "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" by Roald Dahl provide a lighthearted lens through which to consider the transformative potential of inventive concoctions, mirroring the innovative spirit of both the brewing and renewable energy spheres.
Reflecting on cinematic narratives, the elegantly swirling landscapes of "The Sound of Music" invite contemplation of the windswept vistas that house the majestically rotating wind turbines – an unexpected parallel between Austrian scenery and Norwegian fjords. Furthermore, the exuberant escapades of "The Secret Life of Walter Mitty" offer a whimsical portrayal of unexpected adventure, mirroring our own academic voyage into the uncharted territory of Brew and Renew.
As we venture beyond the confines of traditional research domains, the perplexing convergence of breweries and wind power beckons us to embrace the unexpected and revel in the unexplored connections that animate our world. With a nod to both the scholarly and the fanciful, our inquiry seeks to uncork the enigmatic ties binding these curious phenomena, inviting further exploration into the interplay of Inebriated Winds or Evaporated Energy.
[[RESULTS]]
The correlation coefficient of 0.9010866 between the number of breweries in the United States and the wind power generated in Norway suggests a remarkably strong association, akin to the sturdy structure of a well-crafted beer mug. Our analysis yielded an r-squared value of 0.8119570, indicating that over 81% of the variability in wind power generation in Norway can be explained by the number of breweries in the United States. This finding holds with a p-value of less than 0.01, signifying that the likelihood of this correlation occurring by chance is as rare as finding a four-leaf clover in a barley field.
Fig. 1 depicts the unmistakable relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables, akin to the fusion of hops and malt in a carefully brewed ale. The scatterplot resembles the effervescent bubbles rising in a carbonated beverage, illustrating the upward trend of wind power generation in proportion to the burgeoning count of breweries. The robustness of this correlation dances across the graph like the lively carbonation in a freshly uncorked bottle of beer, leaving little room for doubt regarding the strength of this unexpected bond.
While the idea of a connection between breweries and wind power may elicit a chuckle or a raised eyebrow, our findings underscore the importance of considering unanticipated factors in the realm of energy dynamics. As with the intricate blending of ingredients in a complex brew, our study suggests that the intersection of cultural trends and climatic conditions may have a significant impact on the global landscape of renewable energy. This revelation invites further investigation into the potential mechanisms underlying this correlation, offering a refreshing perspective on the interconnectedness of disparate domains.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The remarkably strong correlation between the number of breweries in the United States and the wind power generated in Norway uncovers a fascinating narrative, as intriguing as a tantalizing mystery novel. These findings build upon the scholarly pursuits of Smith et al. and Doe, further substantiating the potential intertwined relationship between environmental conditions and societal activities. The unexpected ties that bind brewing practices and wind energy generation echo the unexpected allure of finding the philosopher's stone in a seemingly ordinary laboratory. This study aligns with the metaphorical lens of Oliver's "The Brewmaster's Handbook," revealing an unexpected alchemical transformation akin to the transmutation of base metals into gold.
Our results echo the robustness of a well-aged wine, demonstrating that over 81% of the variability in wind power generation in Norway can be elucidated by the number of breweries in the United States. This numerical behemoth stands as solid as a stout ale, cementing the bond between these unlikely bedfellows. The scatterplot, akin to a work of art, mirrors the effervescent dance of bubbles in a glass, painting a picture as captivating as the swirling patterns of a Van Gogh masterpiece.
As we raise our glasses to toast these revelatory findings, it becomes increasingly clear that the potential connection between breweries and wind power is not as frothy as it might first seem. Indeed, the likelihood of this correlation occurring by chance is as rare as stumbling upon a virtuoso brewer crafting an unparalleled beverage.
In the spirit of adventurous inquiry, this study beckons the scholarly community to uncork the complexities of these enigmatic connections. Indeed, as J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire" alludes to the mysterious powers of magical brews, our findings unravel the whimsical potential of these peculiar relationships. Just as the winds power the majestic turbines in the Norwegian fjords, the winds of curiosity and wonder propel us to further explore the uncharted territory of Brew and Renew.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of Breweries in the United States and Wind power generated in Norway. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Brew and Renew: Inebriated Winds or Evaporated Energy?
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the surprising correlation between the number of breweries in the United States and the wind power generated in Norway. Drawing on data from the Brewers Association and the Energy Information Administration spanning from 1992 to 2021, our research team identified a correlation coefficient of 0.9010866 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. While this finding may seem as frothy as a freshly poured pint, our analysis reveals a potential link between the proliferation of breweries and the generation of wind power. This intriguing relationship prompts further investigation into the interconnectedness of global energy patterns and the imbibing preferences of individuals. Our findings highlight the importance of considering both climate conditions and cultural trends in the pursuit of sustainable energy solutions.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the realm of renewable energy, the pursuit of sustainable and efficient power sources has led researchers and policymakers to explore unusual and unexpected correlations. As the world grapples with the challenges of climate change, scientists are casting a wider net, seeking insights from unconventional sources. One such curious correlation that has piqued the interest of our research team is the unlikely relationship between the number of breweries in the United States and the wind power generated in Norway. At first blush, one might assume this connection to be as fleeting as a passing zephyr, but our analysis has uncovered a significant and robust association that demands further scrutiny.
The landscape of energy production is often perceived as a stark and serious domain, devoid of the whimsy and conviviality found in the world of craft brewing. However, our investigation has revealed a surprising confluence of these seemingly disparate realms. With the brewers on one side, concocting their amber elixirs, and wind turbines whirling on the Norwegian fjords on the other, our study seeks to unravel the enigmatic ties binding these phenomena together. Could it be that the effervescent spirit of beer brewing somehow carries over to the generation of wind power in distant lands? Or perhaps there exists an unseen force, akin to the fermentation process, propelling both industries towards a shared destiny?
Our foray into this uncharted territory of interdisciplinary research was fueled by the recognition that beneath the surface of these distinct industries lies a rich tapestry of variables waiting to be unravelled. While the notion of linking wind power to the revelry of breweries may seem as improbable as a gravity-defying stout, our preliminary findings have unveiled a correlation coefficient that glitters like a freshly polished beer stein. Join us on this academic odyssey as we raise a toast to the unexpected interplay of Brew and Renew: Inebriated Winds or Evaporated Energy?
[[RESULTS]]
The correlation coefficient of 0.9010866 between the number of breweries in the United States and the wind power generated in Norway suggests a remarkably strong association, akin to the sturdy structure of a well-crafted beer mug. Our analysis yielded an r-squared value of 0.8119570, indicating that over 81% of the variability in wind power generation in Norway can be explained by the number of breweries in the United States. This finding holds with a p-value of less than 0.01, signifying that the likelihood of this correlation occurring by chance is as rare as finding a four-leaf clover in a barley field.
Fig. 1 depicts the unmistakable relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables, akin to the fusion of hops and malt in a carefully brewed ale. The scatterplot resembles the effervescent bubbles rising in a carbonated beverage, illustrating the upward trend of wind power generation in proportion to the burgeoning count of breweries. The robustness of this correlation dances across the graph like the lively carbonation in a freshly uncorked bottle of beer, leaving little room for doubt regarding the strength of this unexpected bond.
While the idea of a connection between breweries and wind power may elicit a chuckle or a raised eyebrow, our findings underscore the importance of considering unanticipated factors in the realm of energy dynamics. As with the intricate blending of ingredients in a complex brew, our study suggests that the intersection of cultural trends and climatic conditions may have a significant impact on the global landscape of renewable energy. This revelation invites further investigation into the potential mechanisms underlying this correlation, offering a refreshing perspective on the interconnectedness of disparate domains.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our investigation into the entwined realms of breweries in the United States and wind power generation in Norway has yielded results as invigorating as a well-poured pint. The robust correlation coefficient and r-squared value highlight a relationship that is as strong and effervescent as the bubbles in a freshly poured brew. While this unexpected connection may initially seem as unlikely as a kangaroo performing ballet, the statistical significance cannot be ignored.
This study not only showcases the surprising interplay between cultural indulgences and sustainable energy production but also serves as a reminder that research can lead us to unexpected places, much like a lost sock in the dryer. As our findings suggest, the churning winds of change in the energy sector may be influenced by the spirited fermentations of the brewing world. It is clear that beyond the frothy surfaces of these distinct realms lie deep currents that intertwine in ways as intricate as the patterns of foam atop a well-crafted beer.
Therefore, it is with great conviction that we assert that no further research is necessary in this area. The correlation between the number of breweries in the United States and the wind power generated in Norway stands as solid as a barrel-aged stout, leaving little room for doubt or further inquiry, much like the feeling of satisfaction after a successful experiment. Sometimes, as elusive as a unicorn in the forest, correlation can indeed lead us to unexpected and delightful discoveries.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Brew and Renew: Inebriated Winds or Evaporated Energy?. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Intoxication Studies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Brew and Renew: Inebriated Winds or Evaporated Energy?. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Society for Alcoholic Atmospheric Analysis and Alternative Energy Exploration
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Brew and Renew: Inebriated Winds or Evaporated Energy? with an abstract of This study investigates the surprising correlation between the number of breweries in the United States and the wind power generated in Norway. Drawing on data from the Brewers Association and the Energy Information Administration spanning from 1992 to 2021, our research team identified a correlation coefficient of 0.9010866 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. While this finding may seem as frothy as a freshly poured pint, our analysis reveals a potential link between the proliferation of breweries and the generation of wind power. This intriguing relationship prompts further investigation into the interconnectedness of global energy patterns and the imbibing preferences of individuals. Our findings highlight the importance of considering both climate conditions and cultural trends in the pursuit of sustainable energy solutions.
ChatGPT:
breweries, wind power, correlation, energy generation, United States, Norway, Brewers Association, Energy Information Administration, climate conditions, sustainable energy, global energy patterns, cultural trends
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
The number of Breweries in the United StatesDetailed data title: Number of Breweries in the United States
Source: Brewers Association
See what else correlates with The number of Breweries in the United States
Wind power generated in Norway
Detailed data title: Total wind power generated in Norway in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Wind power generated in Norway
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.8119570 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 81.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Wind power generated in Norway) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of Breweries in the United States) over the 30 years from 1992 through 2021.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.1E-11. 0.0000000000113768704217942120
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.9 in 1.1E-9% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 87,897,634,668 random variables You don't actually need 87 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 29 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 29 because we have two variables measured over a period of 30 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.8, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | |
The number of Breweries in the United States (Number of breweries) | 405 | 490 | 634 | 1006 | 1305 | 1475 | 1651 | 1577 | 1493 | 1499 | 1575 | 1629 | 1635 | 1612 | 1741 | 1805 | 1896 | 1933 | 2131 | 2525 | 2670 | 3162 | 4014 | 4847 | 5780 | 6767 | 7722 | 8557 | 9092 | 9384 |
Wind power generated in Norway (Billion kWh) | 0.00285 | 0.007 | 0.009 | 0.01 | 0.009 | 0.011 | 0.011 | 0.025 | 0.031 | 0.027 | 0.075 | 0.218 | 0.252 | 0.499 | 0.636 | 0.892 | 0.913 | 0.977 | 0.878998 | 1.283 | 1.548 | 1.881 | 2.215 | 2.513 | 2.116 | 2.852 | 3.87588 | 5.514 | 9.90529 | 11.7607 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.
- Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data.
In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.
For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.
(This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([405,490,634,1006,1305,1475,1651,1577,1493,1499,1575,1629,1635,1612,1741,1805,1896,1933,2131,2525,2670,3162,4014,4847,5780,6767,7722,8557,9092,9384,])
array_2 = np.array([0.00285,0.007,0.009,0.01,0.009,0.011,0.011,0.025,0.031,0.027,0.075,0.218,0.252,0.499,0.636,0.892,0.913,0.977,0.878998,1.283,1.548,1.881,2.215,2.513,2.116,2.852,3.87588,5.514,9.90529,11.7607,])
array_1_name = "The number of Breweries in the United States"
array_2_name = "Wind power generated in Norway"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only The number of Breweries in the United States
- Line chart for only Wind power generated in Norway
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Brew and Renew: Inebriated Winds or Evaporated Energy?
Your rating is much appreciated!
Correlation ID: 2856 · Black Variable ID: 34 · Red Variable ID: 23878