Report an error
Fossil fuel use in Ecuador correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Annabelle | r=0.97 | 42yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Camden | r=0.96 | 42yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Massachusetts | r=0.93 | 42yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Virginia | r=0.92 | 42yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Jeremiah | r=0.92 | 42yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Maryland | r=0.91 | 42yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Michigan | r=0.9 | 42yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'Taylor Swift' | r=0.88 | 16yrs | No |
UFO sightings in Ohio | r=0.88 | 42yrs | Yes! |
The number of movies Emma Stone appeared in | r=0.87 | 15yrs | Yes! |
UFO sightings in Alabama | r=0.85 | 42yrs | Yes! |
The number of postsecondary art, drama, and music teachers in California | r=0.84 | 19yrs | No |
Fossil fuel use in Ecuador also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)