Report an error
Solar power generated in Bolivia correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Air pollution in Orlando | r=1 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Average length of OverSimplified YouTube videos | r=1 | 6yrs | Yes! |
Adobe's stock price (ADBE) | r=0.99 | 14yrs | No |
Google searches for 'Mr. Beast' | r=0.97 | 14yrs | No |
Google searches for 'that is sus' | r=0.96 | 14yrs | Yes! |
Solar power generated in Bolivia also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)