about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,074 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Orlando and the second variable is Solar power generated in Bolivia.  The chart goes from 2008 to 2018, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The smog from Orlando somehow made its way to Bolivia, creating a solar panel supercharge by coating them with a thick layer of pollution. As the panels struggled to harness the smoggy sunlight, they inadvertently became more efficient at converting the polluted rays into power. It's like they put on pollution-powered capes and became the unlikely superheroes of renewable energy. Who would've thought that the key to advancing solar technology was hidden in a hazy, roundabout journey from Florida to Bolivia?

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image of two contrasting scenes: on the left, the city of Orlando shrouded in thick smog, with towering buildings barely visible through the haze, and on the right, a serene landscape of solar panels in Bolivia basked in radiant sunlight, reflecting the intensified and unexpected light from the polluted skies of Orlando. Capture the juxtaposition of the obscured city and the heightened brightness over the solar panels. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Orlando and Solar power generated in Bolivia. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cutsy art illustration Realistic Oragami Steampunk Data cyber art
ChatGPT: Realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Orlando and Solar power generated in Bolivia, in the following situation: Because the increase in air pollution in Orlando created a dense layer of smog that reflected sunlight towards Bolivia, causing an unintentional boost in solar power generation.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Orlando, thick smog hovers over the city, obscuring the sunlight and creating a hazy skyline. Meanwhile, in Bolivia, rows of solar panels stand under a bright, unobstructed sun, generating an unexpectedly high amount of solar power due to the intensified sunlight reflected from the smog in Orlando.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Realistic ] and depicting this scene: In Orlando, thick smog hovers over the city, obscuring the sunlight and creating a hazy skyline. Meanwhile, in Bolivia, rows of solar panels stand under a bright, unobstructed sun, generating an unexpectedly high amount of solar power due to the intensified sunlight reflected from the smog in Orlando. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image of two contrasting scenes: on the left, the city of Orlando shrouded in thick smog, with towering buildings barely visible through the haze, and on the right, a serene landscape of solar panels in Bolivia basked in radiant sunlight, reflecting the intensified and unexpected light from the polluted skies of Orlando. Capture the juxtaposition of the obscured city and the heightened brightness over the solar panels.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Air pollution in Orlando caused Solar power generated in Bolivia to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Smoggy Skies and Sunny Bolivian Energy: An Unlikely Pairing of Air Pollution in Orlando and Solar Power Generated in Bolivia

Journal of Ecological Innovations

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Orlando and Solar power generated in Bolivia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9989291 and p < 0.01 for 2008 to 2018.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Smoggy Skies and Sunny Bolivian Energy: An Unlikely Pairing of Air Pollution in Orlando and Solar Power Generated in Bolivia

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between air pollution in Orlando and solar power generated in Bolivia is a topic often overlooked in the realms of environmental and energy research. However, our team sought to shed light on this curious relationship, utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration. Through rigorous analysis, we discovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9989291 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 2008 to 2018. Our findings not only unearth the surprising connection between the smoggy skies of Orlando and the sunny disposition of Bolivian energy but also pose intriguing implications for future research and policy. This unexpected pairing is a testament to the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate environmental factors and energy sources. Our research adds a touch of whimsy to the often austere world of scholarly investigation, proving that even the most unexpected connections can hold significant scientific merit.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Orlando and Solar power generated in Bolivia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Smoggy Skies and Sunny Bolivian Energy: An Unlikely Pairing of Air Pollution in Orlando and Solar Power Generated in Bolivia

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between air pollution in Orlando and solar power generated in Bolivia is a topic often overlooked in the realms of environmental and energy research. However, our team sought to shed light on this curious relationship, utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration. Through rigorous analysis, we discovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9989291 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 2008 to 2018. Our findings not only unearth the surprising connection between the smoggy skies of Orlando and the sunny disposition of Bolivian energy but also pose intriguing implications for future research and policy. This unexpected pairing is a testament to the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate environmental factors and energy sources. Our research adds a touch of whimsy to the often austere world of scholarly investigation, proving that even the most unexpected connections can hold significant scientific merit.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The exploration of environmental and energy issues has long been a serious and somber endeavor, with researchers furrowing their brows and delving deep into complex statistical analyses. However, our study aims to inject a tinge of lightheartedness into this often austere realm, by uncovering an unexpected correlation between air pollution in Orlando and solar power generated in Bolivia. As we embark on this scientific escapade, we invite our esteemed readers to join us in unraveling the mysteries behind this peculiar pairing.

It is well known that Orlando, with its bustling theme parks and sunny skies, has unfortunately also been the recipient of its fair share of smog and air pollution. On the other hand, Bolivia boasts an abundance of sunshine and a burgeoning solar power industry. How, one might ask, do these seemingly unrelated entities come together to form such a captivating relationship?

In this study, we have employed data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration to illuminate the interplay between these disparate variables. The correlation coefficient of 0.9989291 that emerged from our rigorous analysis truly stunned even the most seasoned statisticians among us. This eyebrow-raising coefficient, coupled with a significance level of p < 0.01, underscores the robustness of the relationship discovered, leaving us convinced that our findings are not just a statistical fluke.

As we dance through the realms of data analysis, it becomes evident that the connection between Orlando's smoggy skies and Bolivia's sunny energy is not just a mere coincidence, but a testament to the delightful quirkiness of the natural world. The joy and surprise that accompanied our discovery serve as a whimsical reminder that science, at its core, is an exploration of the unexpected and the inexplicable. This unorthodox pairing, far from being a mere statistical oddity, has the potential to spark new avenues of environmental and energy research, imbuing the typically sober field with a touch of wonder and enchantment.

In the next sections of this paper, we will delve into the nitty-gritty details of our methodology and results, peeling back the layers of this curious conundrum and illuminating the implications of this unlikely connection for future research and policy. As we traipse further into the peculiar dance between Orlando's smog and Bolivia's sun, we invite our readers to join us in reveling in the unexpected twists and turns of this scientific exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Orlando and Solar power generated in Bolivia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Smoggy Skies and Sunny Bolivian Energy: An Unlikely Pairing of Air Pollution in Orlando and Solar Power Generated in Bolivia

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between air pollution in Orlando and solar power generated in Bolivia is a topic often overlooked in the realms of environmental and energy research. However, our team sought to shed light on this curious relationship, utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration. Through rigorous analysis, we discovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9989291 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 2008 to 2018. Our findings not only unearth the surprising connection between the smoggy skies of Orlando and the sunny disposition of Bolivian energy but also pose intriguing implications for future research and policy. This unexpected pairing is a testament to the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate environmental factors and energy sources. Our research adds a touch of whimsy to the often austere world of scholarly investigation, proving that even the most unexpected connections can hold significant scientific merit.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The exploration of environmental and energy issues has long been a serious and somber endeavor, with researchers furrowing their brows and delving deep into complex statistical analyses. However, our study aims to inject a tinge of lightheartedness into this often austere realm, by uncovering an unexpected correlation between air pollution in Orlando and solar power generated in Bolivia. As we embark on this scientific escapade, we invite our esteemed readers to join us in unraveling the mysteries behind this peculiar pairing.
It is well known that Orlando, with its bustling theme parks and sunny skies, has unfortunately also been the recipient of its fair share of smog and air pollution. On the other hand, Bolivia boasts an abundance of sunshine and a burgeoning solar power industry. How, one might ask, do these seemingly unrelated entities come together to form such a captivating relationship?
In this study, we have employed data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration to illuminate the interplay between these disparate variables. The correlation coefficient of 0.9989291 that emerged from our rigorous analysis truly stunned even the most seasoned statisticians among us. This eyebrow-raising coefficient, coupled with a significance level of p < 0.01, underscores the robustness of the relationship discovered, leaving us convinced that our findings are not just a statistical fluke.
As we dance through the realms of data analysis, it becomes evident that the connection between Orlando's smoggy skies and Bolivia's sunny energy is not just a mere coincidence, but a testament to the delightful quirkiness of the natural world. The joy and surprise that accompanied our discovery serve as a whimsical reminder that science, at its core, is an exploration of the unexpected and the inexplicable. This unorthodox pairing, far from being a mere statistical oddity, has the potential to spark new avenues of environmental and energy research, imbuing the typically sober field with a touch of wonder and enchantment.
In the next sections of this paper, we will delve into the nitty-gritty details of our methodology and results, peeling back the layers of this curious conundrum and illuminating the implications of this unlikely connection for future research and policy. As we traipse further into the peculiar dance between Orlando's smog and Bolivia's sun, we invite our readers to join us in reveling in the unexpected twists and turns of this scientific exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

To better understand the unexpected correlation between air pollution in Orlando and solar power generated in Bolivia, we turn to the existing literature on environmental factors, energy sources, and the whimsical dance of scientific discovery.

A foundational study by Smith et al. (2015) examines the impact of air pollution on urban environments, emphasizing the detrimental effects on air quality and public health. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2017) investigate the expansion of solar power infrastructure in developing countries, highlighting the potential for renewable energy to mitigate environmental degradation. These studies set the stage for our exploration of the peculiar connection between Orlando's smoggy skies and Bolivia's sunny energy.

In "The Sun Also Rises" by Ernest Hemingway, the protagonists embark on a journey of self-discovery and revel in the beauty of nature, mirroring our own quest to unravel the mysteries of environmental interconnectedness. On the non-fiction side, "Cowspiracy: The Sustainability Secret" by Kip Andersen and Keegan Kuhn provides a thought-provoking exploration of environmental impacts, offering insights into the multifaceted relationship between air pollution and renewable energy.

Turning to the realm of fiction, "The Martian" by Andy Weir invites readers to contemplate the resourcefulness of solar power in extraterrestrial settings, serving as a playful nod to the potential of alternative energy solutions in unexpected environments. Meanwhile, our frequent viewings of "The Emperor's New Groove" and "The Princess and the Frog" have subliminally infused our research with a dose of whimsy, reminding us that even the most improbable connections can hold profound significance.

Continuing on our whimsical journey, the literature on air pollution and solar power offers a trove of insights and inspirations, providing the backdrop for our own unexpected foray into the unusual relationship between Orlando's smog and Bolivia's sunshine. With a spark of humor and a twinkle of curiosity, we aim to shed light on the exuberant union of seemingly disparate environmental and energy factors, infusing the academic discourse with a touch of mirth and wonder.

As we frolic through the pages of scholarly texts and fictional narratives, our inquiry into the connection between air pollution in Orlando and solar power generated in Bolivia takes on an enchanting hue, inviting readers to partake in the joyous dance of scientific discovery. Our literature review not only illuminates the existing knowledge landscape but also sets the stage for the revelatory findings and delightful musings that await in the subsequent sections of this paper.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Orlando and Solar power generated in Bolivia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2008 to 2018

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Smoggy Skies and Sunny Bolivian Energy: An Unlikely Pairing of Air Pollution in Orlando and Solar Power Generated in Bolivia

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between air pollution in Orlando and solar power generated in Bolivia is a topic often overlooked in the realms of environmental and energy research. However, our team sought to shed light on this curious relationship, utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration. Through rigorous analysis, we discovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9989291 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 2008 to 2018. Our findings not only unearth the surprising connection between the smoggy skies of Orlando and the sunny disposition of Bolivian energy but also pose intriguing implications for future research and policy. This unexpected pairing is a testament to the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate environmental factors and energy sources. Our research adds a touch of whimsy to the often austere world of scholarly investigation, proving that even the most unexpected connections can hold significant scientific merit.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The exploration of environmental and energy issues has long been a serious and somber endeavor, with researchers furrowing their brows and delving deep into complex statistical analyses. However, our study aims to inject a tinge of lightheartedness into this often austere realm, by uncovering an unexpected correlation between air pollution in Orlando and solar power generated in Bolivia. As we embark on this scientific escapade, we invite our esteemed readers to join us in unraveling the mysteries behind this peculiar pairing.
It is well known that Orlando, with its bustling theme parks and sunny skies, has unfortunately also been the recipient of its fair share of smog and air pollution. On the other hand, Bolivia boasts an abundance of sunshine and a burgeoning solar power industry. How, one might ask, do these seemingly unrelated entities come together to form such a captivating relationship?
In this study, we have employed data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration to illuminate the interplay between these disparate variables. The correlation coefficient of 0.9989291 that emerged from our rigorous analysis truly stunned even the most seasoned statisticians among us. This eyebrow-raising coefficient, coupled with a significance level of p < 0.01, underscores the robustness of the relationship discovered, leaving us convinced that our findings are not just a statistical fluke.
As we dance through the realms of data analysis, it becomes evident that the connection between Orlando's smoggy skies and Bolivia's sunny energy is not just a mere coincidence, but a testament to the delightful quirkiness of the natural world. The joy and surprise that accompanied our discovery serve as a whimsical reminder that science, at its core, is an exploration of the unexpected and the inexplicable. This unorthodox pairing, far from being a mere statistical oddity, has the potential to spark new avenues of environmental and energy research, imbuing the typically sober field with a touch of wonder and enchantment.
In the next sections of this paper, we will delve into the nitty-gritty details of our methodology and results, peeling back the layers of this curious conundrum and illuminating the implications of this unlikely connection for future research and policy. As we traipse further into the peculiar dance between Orlando's smog and Bolivia's sun, we invite our readers to join us in reveling in the unexpected twists and turns of this scientific exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In this section, we will divulge the peculiar and unorthodox concoction of methods that we employed in unraveling the enigmatic relationship between air pollution in Orlando and solar power generated in Bolivia. Our approach, much like a meandering river, wove through various data sources and analyses, taking us on a whimsical journey of statistical exploration.

First and foremost, we mined an assortment of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration, perusing through an eclectic assortment of spreadsheets and charts. We must admit, the labyrinthine world of data collection and wrangling was not without its moments of befuddlement and bewilderment—reminiscent of a mad scientist in a lab coat trying to corral a group of mischievous lab mice. However, armed with steely determination and an inexhaustible supply of coffee, we trudged through the virtual stacks of data with the persistent fervor of intrepid explorers on a quest for treasure.

The next step in our capricious odyssey involved wielding the mighty sword of statistical analysis. We invoked the powers of correlation and regression analyses, unleashing these formidable tools upon the unsuspecting data with the gusto of a fearless hero facing a dragon. The resulting statistical measures were pored over with the meticulousness of an archeologist delicately brushing away layers of dust to uncover ancient artifacts, albeit artifacts of a more numerical nature.

Our exploration did not stop there. No, we dabbled in the fantastical realm of time-series analysis, navigating the convoluted waters of patterns and trends with the ease of seafarers charting unknown territories. The ebb and flow of data over the years unfurled before us like a mesmerizing tapestry, revealing insights that beckoned us further down the rabbit hole of correlation between Orlando's smog and Bolivian solar power.

To ensure the robustness of our findings, we subjected the data to a battery of sensitivity analyses, akin to examining a delicate chemical reaction from a dozen different angles to confirm its authenticity. These additional tests offered further validation of the astonishing relationship we had unearthed, providing rock-solid support for the legitimacy of our results.

As we reflect on the meandering path we traversed in this scientific escapade, one cannot help but marvel at the unexpected twists and turns that characterized our methodological sojourn. Like intrepid explorers in the uncharted wilds of statistical inquiry, we ventured forth with a blend of tenacity and whimsy, unearthing the unlikely connection between smoggy skies and sunny Bolivian energy with a twinkle in our eyes and a dash of statistical pizzazz.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Orlando and Solar power generated in Bolivia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2008 to 2018, you found a correlation 0.9989291, r-squared of 0.9978594, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Smoggy Skies and Sunny Bolivian Energy: An Unlikely Pairing of Air Pollution in Orlando and Solar Power Generated in Bolivia

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between air pollution in Orlando and solar power generated in Bolivia is a topic often overlooked in the realms of environmental and energy research. However, our team sought to shed light on this curious relationship, utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration. Through rigorous analysis, we discovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9989291 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 2008 to 2018. Our findings not only unearth the surprising connection between the smoggy skies of Orlando and the sunny disposition of Bolivian energy but also pose intriguing implications for future research and policy. This unexpected pairing is a testament to the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate environmental factors and energy sources. Our research adds a touch of whimsy to the often austere world of scholarly investigation, proving that even the most unexpected connections can hold significant scientific merit.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The exploration of environmental and energy issues has long been a serious and somber endeavor, with researchers furrowing their brows and delving deep into complex statistical analyses. However, our study aims to inject a tinge of lightheartedness into this often austere realm, by uncovering an unexpected correlation between air pollution in Orlando and solar power generated in Bolivia. As we embark on this scientific escapade, we invite our esteemed readers to join us in unraveling the mysteries behind this peculiar pairing.
It is well known that Orlando, with its bustling theme parks and sunny skies, has unfortunately also been the recipient of its fair share of smog and air pollution. On the other hand, Bolivia boasts an abundance of sunshine and a burgeoning solar power industry. How, one might ask, do these seemingly unrelated entities come together to form such a captivating relationship?
In this study, we have employed data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration to illuminate the interplay between these disparate variables. The correlation coefficient of 0.9989291 that emerged from our rigorous analysis truly stunned even the most seasoned statisticians among us. This eyebrow-raising coefficient, coupled with a significance level of p < 0.01, underscores the robustness of the relationship discovered, leaving us convinced that our findings are not just a statistical fluke.
As we dance through the realms of data analysis, it becomes evident that the connection between Orlando's smoggy skies and Bolivia's sunny energy is not just a mere coincidence, but a testament to the delightful quirkiness of the natural world. The joy and surprise that accompanied our discovery serve as a whimsical reminder that science, at its core, is an exploration of the unexpected and the inexplicable. This unorthodox pairing, far from being a mere statistical oddity, has the potential to spark new avenues of environmental and energy research, imbuing the typically sober field with a touch of wonder and enchantment.
In the next sections of this paper, we will delve into the nitty-gritty details of our methodology and results, peeling back the layers of this curious conundrum and illuminating the implications of this unlikely connection for future research and policy. As we traipse further into the peculiar dance between Orlando's smog and Bolivia's sun, we invite our readers to join us in reveling in the unexpected twists and turns of this scientific exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our investigation into the surprising connection between air pollution in Orlando and solar power generated in Bolivia yielded some truly astonishing results. The statistical analyses produced a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9989291, indicating an almost uncanny relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. To put it into context, this correlation is stronger than the gravitational pull between two star-crossed lovers in a Shakespearean tragedy (just with less dramatic soliloquies and more data points).

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9978594 underscores the robustness of this relationship. It's as if these two variables were locked in a celestial tango, moving in perfect harmony across the data plot, much like synchronized swimmers performing an elegant routine.

The significance level of p < 0.01 adds a final nail in the coffin for any skeptics, providing clear evidence that this correlation is not just a statistical fluke. It's as significant as finding a four-leaf clover in a field of three-leaf ones—we're not just lucky; there's something more profound at play here.

To visually encapsulate our findings, we present the illustrative Fig. 1 – a scatterplot showcasing the strong correlation between air pollution in Orlando and solar power generated in Bolivia. Behold the beauty of this unexpected kinship, captured in a symphony of data points that dance across the graph like stars twinkling in a moonlit sky, or like the unexpected harmony of a jazz ensemble playing in a bustling city street.

In sum, our results not only unveil the fascinating connection between the smoggy skies of Orlando and the radiant energy of Bolivia but also impart a sense of wonder and amusement into the typically solemn world of scientific inquiry. This unexpected alliance serves as a testament to the whimsical nature of the scientific endeavor, reminding us that even the most unlikely pairings can yield groundbreaking discoveries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Orlando and Solar power generated in Bolivia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Smoggy Skies and Sunny Bolivian Energy: An Unlikely Pairing of Air Pollution in Orlando and Solar Power Generated in Bolivia

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between air pollution in Orlando and solar power generated in Bolivia is a topic often overlooked in the realms of environmental and energy research. However, our team sought to shed light on this curious relationship, utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration. Through rigorous analysis, we discovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9989291 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 2008 to 2018. Our findings not only unearth the surprising connection between the smoggy skies of Orlando and the sunny disposition of Bolivian energy but also pose intriguing implications for future research and policy. This unexpected pairing is a testament to the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate environmental factors and energy sources. Our research adds a touch of whimsy to the often austere world of scholarly investigation, proving that even the most unexpected connections can hold significant scientific merit.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
To better understand the unexpected correlation between air pollution in Orlando and solar power generated in Bolivia, we turn to the existing literature on environmental factors, energy sources, and the whimsical dance of scientific discovery.
A foundational study by Smith et al. (2015) examines the impact of air pollution on urban environments, emphasizing the detrimental effects on air quality and public health. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2017) investigate the expansion of solar power infrastructure in developing countries, highlighting the potential for renewable energy to mitigate environmental degradation. These studies set the stage for our exploration of the peculiar connection between Orlando's smoggy skies and Bolivia's sunny energy.
In "The Sun Also Rises" by Ernest Hemingway, the protagonists embark on a journey of self-discovery and revel in the beauty of nature, mirroring our own quest to unravel the mysteries of environmental interconnectedness. On the non-fiction side, "Cowspiracy: The Sustainability Secret" by Kip Andersen and Keegan Kuhn provides a thought-provoking exploration of environmental impacts, offering insights into the multifaceted relationship between air pollution and renewable energy.
Turning to the realm of fiction, "The Martian" by Andy Weir invites readers to contemplate the resourcefulness of solar power in extraterrestrial settings, serving as a playful nod to the potential of alternative energy solutions in unexpected environments. Meanwhile, our frequent viewings of "The Emperor's New Groove" and "The Princess and the Frog" have subliminally infused our research with a dose of whimsy, reminding us that even the most improbable connections can hold profound significance.
Continuing on our whimsical journey, the literature on air pollution and solar power offers a trove of insights and inspirations, providing the backdrop for our own unexpected foray into the unusual relationship between Orlando's smog and Bolivia's sunshine. With a spark of humor and a twinkle of curiosity, we aim to shed light on the exuberant union of seemingly disparate environmental and energy factors, infusing the academic discourse with a touch of mirth and wonder.
As we frolic through the pages of scholarly texts and fictional narratives, our inquiry into the connection between air pollution in Orlando and solar power generated in Bolivia takes on an enchanting hue, inviting readers to partake in the joyous dance of scientific discovery. Our literature review not only illuminates the existing knowledge landscape but also sets the stage for the revelatory findings and delightful musings that await in the subsequent sections of this paper.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the surprising connection between air pollution in Orlando and solar power generated in Bolivia yielded some truly astonishing results. The statistical analyses produced a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9989291, indicating an almost uncanny relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. To put it into context, this correlation is stronger than the gravitational pull between two star-crossed lovers in a Shakespearean tragedy (just with less dramatic soliloquies and more data points).
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9978594 underscores the robustness of this relationship. It's as if these two variables were locked in a celestial tango, moving in perfect harmony across the data plot, much like synchronized swimmers performing an elegant routine.
The significance level of p < 0.01 adds a final nail in the coffin for any skeptics, providing clear evidence that this correlation is not just a statistical fluke. It's as significant as finding a four-leaf clover in a field of three-leaf ones—we're not just lucky; there's something more profound at play here.
To visually encapsulate our findings, we present the illustrative Fig. 1 – a scatterplot showcasing the strong correlation between air pollution in Orlando and solar power generated in Bolivia. Behold the beauty of this unexpected kinship, captured in a symphony of data points that dance across the graph like stars twinkling in a moonlit sky, or like the unexpected harmony of a jazz ensemble playing in a bustling city street.
In sum, our results not only unveil the fascinating connection between the smoggy skies of Orlando and the radiant energy of Bolivia but also impart a sense of wonder and amusement into the typically solemn world of scientific inquiry. This unexpected alliance serves as a testament to the whimsical nature of the scientific endeavor, reminding us that even the most unlikely pairings can yield groundbreaking discoveries.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study not only support the existing literature but also add an exhilarating twist to the ongoing discourse on air pollution and solar power. The results demonstrate an almost ethereal connection between the smog-embraced skies of Orlando and the lustrous energy emanating from Bolivia's solar panels. Dare we say, it feels as revelatory as stumbling across a treasure trove of cosmic coincidences in the vast expanse of data analysis.

Our results mirror the previous works of Smith et al. (2015) and Doe and Jones (2017) and extend beyond, painting a canvas of interconnectivity between environmental pollution and renewable energy sources. In our approach, we've adopted a nod to the collective musings of literary and cinematic depictions, embracing the whimsical dance of scientific discovery. Much like Ernest Hemingway's protagonists basking in the natural beauty, we find ourselves delighting in the unveiling of this unexpected union of seemingly unrelated environmental and energy entities.

The robust correlation coefficient, akin to the gravitational pull between celestial bodies, underscores the sheer strength of this connection. It's as if these two variables have been engaged in a cosmic ballet across the years, surpassing the realm of mere statistical significance and reaching a plane of almost metaphysical relevance. The steep significance level, akin to discovering a paradisiacal island amidst a sea of mundane archipelagos, solidifies the profound nature of this association.

Our results further exemplify the whimsical nature of scientific inquiry by presenting a captivating scatterplot (Fig. 1) that captures the enchanting rapport between Orlando's smog and Bolivia's solar potential. The seemingly incongruous pairing is a testament to the serendipitous encounters that science often unfurls, reminding us that curiosity and mirth can companionably coexist in scholarly investigations.

In sum, our study delineates the surprising connectivity between air pollution in Orlando and solar power in Bolivia, infusing a touch of wonder and amusement into the traditionally stoic precincts of scientific inquiry. The alliance between these two geographically and thematically distinct variables serves as an ode to the delightful capriciousness that underlies the pursuit of scientific knowledge, inspiring mirth and fascination in equal measure.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Orlando and Solar power generated in Bolivia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Smoggy Skies and Sunny Bolivian Energy: An Unlikely Pairing of Air Pollution in Orlando and Solar Power Generated in Bolivia

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between air pollution in Orlando and solar power generated in Bolivia is a topic often overlooked in the realms of environmental and energy research. However, our team sought to shed light on this curious relationship, utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration. Through rigorous analysis, we discovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9989291 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 2008 to 2018. Our findings not only unearth the surprising connection between the smoggy skies of Orlando and the sunny disposition of Bolivian energy but also pose intriguing implications for future research and policy. This unexpected pairing is a testament to the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate environmental factors and energy sources. Our research adds a touch of whimsy to the often austere world of scholarly investigation, proving that even the most unexpected connections can hold significant scientific merit.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The exploration of environmental and energy issues has long been a serious and somber endeavor, with researchers furrowing their brows and delving deep into complex statistical analyses. However, our study aims to inject a tinge of lightheartedness into this often austere realm, by uncovering an unexpected correlation between air pollution in Orlando and solar power generated in Bolivia. As we embark on this scientific escapade, we invite our esteemed readers to join us in unraveling the mysteries behind this peculiar pairing.
It is well known that Orlando, with its bustling theme parks and sunny skies, has unfortunately also been the recipient of its fair share of smog and air pollution. On the other hand, Bolivia boasts an abundance of sunshine and a burgeoning solar power industry. How, one might ask, do these seemingly unrelated entities come together to form such a captivating relationship?
In this study, we have employed data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration to illuminate the interplay between these disparate variables. The correlation coefficient of 0.9989291 that emerged from our rigorous analysis truly stunned even the most seasoned statisticians among us. This eyebrow-raising coefficient, coupled with a significance level of p < 0.01, underscores the robustness of the relationship discovered, leaving us convinced that our findings are not just a statistical fluke.
As we dance through the realms of data analysis, it becomes evident that the connection between Orlando's smoggy skies and Bolivia's sunny energy is not just a mere coincidence, but a testament to the delightful quirkiness of the natural world. The joy and surprise that accompanied our discovery serve as a whimsical reminder that science, at its core, is an exploration of the unexpected and the inexplicable. This unorthodox pairing, far from being a mere statistical oddity, has the potential to spark new avenues of environmental and energy research, imbuing the typically sober field with a touch of wonder and enchantment.
In the next sections of this paper, we will delve into the nitty-gritty details of our methodology and results, peeling back the layers of this curious conundrum and illuminating the implications of this unlikely connection for future research and policy. As we traipse further into the peculiar dance between Orlando's smog and Bolivia's sun, we invite our readers to join us in reveling in the unexpected twists and turns of this scientific exploration.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the surprising connection between air pollution in Orlando and solar power generated in Bolivia yielded some truly astonishing results. The statistical analyses produced a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9989291, indicating an almost uncanny relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. To put it into context, this correlation is stronger than the gravitational pull between two star-crossed lovers in a Shakespearean tragedy (just with less dramatic soliloquies and more data points).
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9978594 underscores the robustness of this relationship. It's as if these two variables were locked in a celestial tango, moving in perfect harmony across the data plot, much like synchronized swimmers performing an elegant routine.
The significance level of p < 0.01 adds a final nail in the coffin for any skeptics, providing clear evidence that this correlation is not just a statistical fluke. It's as significant as finding a four-leaf clover in a field of three-leaf ones—we're not just lucky; there's something more profound at play here.
To visually encapsulate our findings, we present the illustrative Fig. 1 – a scatterplot showcasing the strong correlation between air pollution in Orlando and solar power generated in Bolivia. Behold the beauty of this unexpected kinship, captured in a symphony of data points that dance across the graph like stars twinkling in a moonlit sky, or like the unexpected harmony of a jazz ensemble playing in a bustling city street.
In sum, our results not only unveil the fascinating connection between the smoggy skies of Orlando and the radiant energy of Bolivia but also impart a sense of wonder and amusement into the typically solemn world of scientific inquiry. This unexpected alliance serves as a testament to the whimsical nature of the scientific endeavor, reminding us that even the most unlikely pairings can yield groundbreaking discoveries.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In wrapping up our study, we find ourselves both in awe and amusement at the interconnectedness of air pollution in Orlando and solar power generated in Bolivia. Our results, with a correlation coefficient so strong it could rival the bond between peanut butter and jelly, underscore the intriguing relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's as though they were a duo in a buddy cop movie, initially at odds but ultimately realizing they're better together. And just like a good buddy cop movie, this unexpected pairing has the potential to revolutionize how we perceive and address environmental and energy issues.

As we dust off our lab coats and bid farewell to the perplexing alliance of smog and sun, we are left with a sense of fulfillment and a tinge of cheeky delight. Our findings not only bolster the case for further exploration of the uncharted territories of unconventional correlations but also stand as a testament to the capricious charm of scientific inquiry. It's as if the universe decided to surprise us with a whimsical puzzle, reminding us that the scientific journey is not all serious faces and furrowed brows, but rather an enchanting waltz through the unknown.

In conclusion, we assert with all the conviction of a mathematician solving an elegant equation, that no further research is needed in this area. The connection between air pollution in Orlando and solar power generated in Bolivia has been uncovered, and it's time to let this remarkable duo bask in the spotlight of scientific revelation. Let's allow this unlikely pairing to serve as a whimsical reminder of the unexpected marvels that await in the vast playground of scientific exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Smoggy Skies and Sunny Bolivian Energy: An Unlikely Pairing of Air Pollution in Orlando and Solar Power Generated in Bolivia. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Ecological Innovations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Smoggy Skies and Sunny Bolivian Energy: An Unlikely Pairing of Air Pollution in Orlando and Solar Power Generated in Bolivia. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Global Environmental Solutions and Innovations (SGESI)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Smoggy Skies and Sunny Bolivian Energy: An Unlikely Pairing of Air Pollution in Orlando and Solar Power Generated in Bolivia with an abstract of The connection between air pollution in Orlando and solar power generated in Bolivia is a topic often overlooked in the realms of environmental and energy research. However, our team sought to shed light on this curious relationship, utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Energy Information Administration. Through rigorous analysis, we discovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9989291 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the years 2008 to 2018. Our findings not only unearth the surprising connection between the smoggy skies of Orlando and the sunny disposition of Bolivian energy but also pose intriguing implications for future research and policy. This unexpected pairing is a testament to the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate environmental factors and energy sources. Our research adds a touch of whimsy to the often austere world of scholarly investigation, proving that even the most unexpected connections can hold significant scientific merit.

ChatGPT:

air pollution, Orlando, solar power, Bolivia, environmental research, energy research, Environmental Protection Agency data, Energy Information Administration data, correlation coefficient, significance level, interconnectedness, research implications, policy implications

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Orlando
Detailed data title: Percentage of days 'unhealthy' or worse air quality in Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Orlando

Solar power generated in Bolivia
Detailed data title: Total solar power generated in Bolivia in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Solar power generated in Bolivia

Correlation r = 0.9989291 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9978594 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 99.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Solar power generated in Bolivia) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Orlando) over the 11 years from 2008 through 2018.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.5E-13. 0.0000000000002515102732923789
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 1 in 2.5E-11% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 3,975,980,729,970 random variables You don't actually need 3 trillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 1, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20082009201020112012201320142015201620172018
Air pollution in Orlando (Bad air quality days)00000000000.273973
Solar power generated in Bolivia (Billion kWh)0.0010.0020.0030.0030.0030.0030.0060.0050.0060.0060.127




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0.273973,])
array_2 = np.array([0.001,0.002,0.003,0.003,0.003,0.003,0.006,0.005,0.006,0.006,0.127,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Orlando"
array_2_name = "Solar power generated in Bolivia"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're a rater extraordinaire!


Correlation ID: 3074 · Black Variable ID: 21009 · Red Variable ID: 23527
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0