Report an error
Biomass power generated in Australia correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Votes for Libertarian Senators in Indiana | r=0.94 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Jonas | r=0.92 | 42yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in Agriculture | r=0.91 | 11yrs | No |
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion | r=0.91 | 42yrs | No |
US Annual Tax Revenue | r=0.88 | 42yrs | No |
The distance between Uranus and Saturn | r=0.86 | 42yrs | No |
UFO sightings in California | r=0.86 | 42yrs | No |
The number of loan interviewers and clerks in Utah | r=0.79 | 18yrs | Yes! |
The number of movies Willem Dafoe appeared in | r=0.74 | 42yrs | No |
Biomass power generated in Australia also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)