Report an error
Air pollution in Washington Court House, Ohio correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the 'aint nobody got time for that' meme | r=1 | 7yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'willy wonka' meme | r=1 | 7yrs | No |
Lionel Messi's goal count for Argentina | r=0.92 | 7yrs | No |
Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count | r=0.91 | 9yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'how to fake your own death' | r=0.8 | 9yrs | Yes! |
Air pollution in Washington Court House, Ohio also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)