about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,706 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Washington Court House, Ohio and the second variable is Google searches for 'how to fake your own death'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2012, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The smog became so thick that it created the perfect cover for staging a dramatic car explosion and disappearance, while leaving behind nothing but a charred mannequin in your burnt-out car. It's like the ultimate magic trick, but with more coughing and respiratory issues. The polluted air provided the most convenient smoke screen for executing a vanishing act and starting a new life under a new identity. It's the environmental crisis no one saw coming, except for those who Googled it and vanished into thin (polluted) air.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [A Polaroid photo] Create an image of a small town in Ohio. The sky is tinged with a subtle yet noticeable hazy quality, depicting the presence of air pollution. On the town's streets, people are seen wearing protective masks, their figures slightly obscured by the masks. Among the crowd, a line of cars can be seen trailing along a winding road leading out of town. One of the cars, visible through the car window, contains a passenger frantically typing on their phone. The atmosphere should evoke a sense of desperation and suffocation, with an underlying desire for a fresh start. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Washington Court House, Ohio and Google searches for 'how to fake your own death'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Woodblock painting a Polaroid photo An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Cubism a funny image you would see on reddit
ChatGPT: A Polaroid photo

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Washington Court House, Ohio and Google searches for 'how to fake your own death', in the following situation: The increase in air pollution in Washington Court House has led to a sudden desire to "escape the smog" by faking one's own demise. People are "gasping for a breath of fresh air" and turning to extreme measures to "clear the air" and start afresh. #ToxicEscape. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a small town in Ohio, the sky is hazy with air pollution, and the streets are filled with people wearing masks to filter the air. Amongst the crowd, a line of cars trails the winding road leading out of town. Inside one of the cars, a passenger furiously types "how to fake your own death" into their phone's search bar, desperate for a way out of the toxic environment. The air is heavy with a sense of suffocation and the desire for a fresh start.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Polaroid photo ] and depicting this scene: In a small town in Ohio, the sky is hazy with air pollution, and the streets are filled with people wearing masks to filter the air. Amongst the crowd, a line of cars trails the winding road leading out of town. Inside one of the cars, a passenger furiously types "how to fake your own death" into their phone's search bar, desperate for a way out of the toxic environment. The air is heavy with a sense of suffocation and the desire for a fresh start. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [A Polaroid photo] Create an image of a small town in Ohio. The sky is tinged with a subtle yet noticeable hazy quality, depicting the presence of air pollution. On the town's streets, people are seen wearing protective masks, their figures slightly obscured by the masks. Among the crowd, a line of cars can be seen trailing along a winding road leading out of town. One of the cars, visible through the car window, contains a passenger frantically typing on their phone. The atmosphere should evoke a sense of desperation and suffocation, with an underlying desire for a fresh start.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Air pollution in Washington Court House, Ohio caused how to fake your own death (Google searches for 'how to fake your own death') to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Pollution Puzzles and Pseudocide: An Analysis of Air Quality and Interest in Faking Death in Washington Court House, Ohio

The Journal of Ecological Enigmas and Existential Escapades

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Washington Court House, Ohio and Google searches for 'how to fake your own death'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8028809 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2012.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Pollution Puzzles and Pseudocide: An Analysis of Air Quality and Interest in Faking Death in Washington Court House, Ohio"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the peculiar link between air quality and the strange yet intriguing surge in Google searches for "how to fake your own death." Utilizing EPA data on air pollution as well as Google Trends analytics, our research team conducted an empirical analysis spanning from 2004 to 2012 in Washington Court House, Ohio. The findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8028809 with a statistically significant p-value less than 0.01, pointing to a positive relationship between air pollution levels and the online quest for extreme anonymity. Our study sheds light on the unanticipated ways in which environmental factors can influence human behavior, and prompts a reevaluation of the phrase "taking a breath of fresh air" in the context of both physical and digital escapades.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Washington Court House, Ohio and Google searches for 'how to fake your own death'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Pollution Puzzles and Pseudocide: An Analysis of Air Quality and Interest in Faking Death in Washington Court House, Ohio"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the peculiar link between air quality and the strange yet intriguing surge in Google searches for "how to fake your own death." Utilizing EPA data on air pollution as well as Google Trends analytics, our research team conducted an empirical analysis spanning from 2004 to 2012 in Washington Court House, Ohio. The findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8028809 with a statistically significant p-value less than 0.01, pointing to a positive relationship between air pollution levels and the online quest for extreme anonymity. Our study sheds light on the unanticipated ways in which environmental factors can influence human behavior, and prompts a reevaluation of the phrase "taking a breath of fresh air" in the context of both physical and digital escapades.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the realm of scientific inquiry, we often find ourselves delving into the strange and unexpected connections that lurk amidst the vast sea of data. Our research has led us down a peculiar path, one that treads the thin line between reality and the tantalizing allure of make-believe. While one might assume that air pollution and the desire to orchestrate one's own passing exist in separate spheres, our investigation has unearthed a surprising correlation that challenges conventional wisdom and tickles the fancy of statisticians and skeptics alike.

As we embark on this intellectual adventure, it is important to acknowledge the enigmatic nature of human behavior and its responsiveness to environmental stimuli. Our study centers on the captivating town of Washington Court House, Ohio, a place where the air quality is often overshadowed by the obscurity of its connection to the world of digital anonymity. Why, one might ponder, would the residents of this quaint town show an increased interest in faking their own demise as air pollution levels fluctuate?

With the precision of a skilled researcher and the curiosity of a detective untangling a web of intrigue, our team sought to unravel the mystery that lies at the intersection of air pollution and the online quest for vanishing without a trace. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to measure air quality, and delving into the labyrinthine realm of Google Trends analytics to track searches for "how to fake your own death," we set out to shine a light on an unexplored facet of human behavior.

The convergence of these seemingly disparate variables sparked our scientific curiosity and fueled our quest to decipher the perplexing relationship between air quality and the temptation to orchestrate an exit from the stage of life. As we embark on this journey of scholarly inquiry, brace yourselves for an adventure through the whimsical world of statistical analysis, where unexpected correlations and whimsical observations await at every turn. Join us as we explore the realm of Pollution Puzzles and Pseudocide, and unravel the mystery that lingers in the digital echoes of Washington Court House, Ohio.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Washington Court House, Ohio and Google searches for 'how to fake your own death'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Pollution Puzzles and Pseudocide: An Analysis of Air Quality and Interest in Faking Death in Washington Court House, Ohio"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the peculiar link between air quality and the strange yet intriguing surge in Google searches for "how to fake your own death." Utilizing EPA data on air pollution as well as Google Trends analytics, our research team conducted an empirical analysis spanning from 2004 to 2012 in Washington Court House, Ohio. The findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8028809 with a statistically significant p-value less than 0.01, pointing to a positive relationship between air pollution levels and the online quest for extreme anonymity. Our study sheds light on the unanticipated ways in which environmental factors can influence human behavior, and prompts a reevaluation of the phrase "taking a breath of fresh air" in the context of both physical and digital escapades.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of scientific inquiry, we often find ourselves delving into the strange and unexpected connections that lurk amidst the vast sea of data. Our research has led us down a peculiar path, one that treads the thin line between reality and the tantalizing allure of make-believe. While one might assume that air pollution and the desire to orchestrate one's own passing exist in separate spheres, our investigation has unearthed a surprising correlation that challenges conventional wisdom and tickles the fancy of statisticians and skeptics alike.
As we embark on this intellectual adventure, it is important to acknowledge the enigmatic nature of human behavior and its responsiveness to environmental stimuli. Our study centers on the captivating town of Washington Court House, Ohio, a place where the air quality is often overshadowed by the obscurity of its connection to the world of digital anonymity. Why, one might ponder, would the residents of this quaint town show an increased interest in faking their own demise as air pollution levels fluctuate?
With the precision of a skilled researcher and the curiosity of a detective untangling a web of intrigue, our team sought to unravel the mystery that lies at the intersection of air pollution and the online quest for vanishing without a trace. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to measure air quality, and delving into the labyrinthine realm of Google Trends analytics to track searches for "how to fake your own death," we set out to shine a light on an unexplored facet of human behavior.
The convergence of these seemingly disparate variables sparked our scientific curiosity and fueled our quest to decipher the perplexing relationship between air quality and the temptation to orchestrate an exit from the stage of life. As we embark on this journey of scholarly inquiry, brace yourselves for an adventure through the whimsical world of statistical analysis, where unexpected correlations and whimsical observations await at every turn. Join us as we explore the realm of Pollution Puzzles and Pseudocide, and unravel the mystery that lingers in the digital echoes of Washington Court House, Ohio.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In our exploration of the enigmatic connection between air quality and the peculiar, if not morbid, fascination with faking one's own death, we delve into a body of literature that spans the fields of environmental science, psychology, and criminology. The initial search for scholarly works promptly led us to the meticulous studies of Smith et al. (2010), who examined the impact of air pollution on human health and behavior. Surprisingly, however, our pursuit also uncovered a series of curiously titled non-fiction works, including "The Art of Disappearing: Faking Your Death and Vanishing Without a Trace" by Jane Doe, which, while not a scholarly source, nevertheless stands as a testament to the enduring allure of clandestine escapades.

Moreover, our reading journey took an unexpected turn as we stumbled upon fictional narratives that, albeit purely figments of imagination, portrayed the intriguing allure of assuming a new identity and vanishing into obscurity. Among these works were "The Disappearance" by J.K. Rowling, whose protagonist embarks on a daring journey of self-erasure, and "Gone Girl" by Gillian Flynn, a thrilling tale of vanishing acts and calculated deception that resonated with our inquiry.

Furthermore, in the pursuit of a deeper understanding of the human psyche and the deceptive allure of pseudocide, our research team found itself indulging in a rather eclectic mix of popular television shows. Programs such as "How to Get Away with Murder" and "Dexter" presented an unusual, though not entirely irrelevant, source of inspiration in our quest to unravel the curious connection between air pollution and the internet's interest in orchestrating a dramatic departure from the mortal coil.

As we immersed ourselves in these diverse sources, punctuated by both serious scholarship and imaginative narratives, it became increasingly evident that the allure of faking one's own death extends beyond the pages of scholarly journals and into the whimsical realm of fiction and entertainment. This interdisciplinary foray into the literature surrounding our research topic provided a refreshing perspective, serving as a gentle reminder that even the most peculiar phenomena are often intertwined with the playful nuance of human imagination.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Washington Court House, Ohio and Google searches for 'how to fake your own death'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2012

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Pollution Puzzles and Pseudocide: An Analysis of Air Quality and Interest in Faking Death in Washington Court House, Ohio"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the peculiar link between air quality and the strange yet intriguing surge in Google searches for "how to fake your own death." Utilizing EPA data on air pollution as well as Google Trends analytics, our research team conducted an empirical analysis spanning from 2004 to 2012 in Washington Court House, Ohio. The findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8028809 with a statistically significant p-value less than 0.01, pointing to a positive relationship between air pollution levels and the online quest for extreme anonymity. Our study sheds light on the unanticipated ways in which environmental factors can influence human behavior, and prompts a reevaluation of the phrase "taking a breath of fresh air" in the context of both physical and digital escapades.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of scientific inquiry, we often find ourselves delving into the strange and unexpected connections that lurk amidst the vast sea of data. Our research has led us down a peculiar path, one that treads the thin line between reality and the tantalizing allure of make-believe. While one might assume that air pollution and the desire to orchestrate one's own passing exist in separate spheres, our investigation has unearthed a surprising correlation that challenges conventional wisdom and tickles the fancy of statisticians and skeptics alike.
As we embark on this intellectual adventure, it is important to acknowledge the enigmatic nature of human behavior and its responsiveness to environmental stimuli. Our study centers on the captivating town of Washington Court House, Ohio, a place where the air quality is often overshadowed by the obscurity of its connection to the world of digital anonymity. Why, one might ponder, would the residents of this quaint town show an increased interest in faking their own demise as air pollution levels fluctuate?
With the precision of a skilled researcher and the curiosity of a detective untangling a web of intrigue, our team sought to unravel the mystery that lies at the intersection of air pollution and the online quest for vanishing without a trace. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to measure air quality, and delving into the labyrinthine realm of Google Trends analytics to track searches for "how to fake your own death," we set out to shine a light on an unexplored facet of human behavior.
The convergence of these seemingly disparate variables sparked our scientific curiosity and fueled our quest to decipher the perplexing relationship between air quality and the temptation to orchestrate an exit from the stage of life. As we embark on this journey of scholarly inquiry, brace yourselves for an adventure through the whimsical world of statistical analysis, where unexpected correlations and whimsical observations await at every turn. Join us as we explore the realm of Pollution Puzzles and Pseudocide, and unravel the mystery that lingers in the digital echoes of Washington Court House, Ohio.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To untangle the enigmatic web of perplexing connections between air pollution and the fascinating quest for digital pseudocide, our research team embarked on a methodological adventure that would make even the most seasoned statistician raise an eyebrow or two. Our data-gathering odyssey began with a careful excavation of Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) archives, where we unearthed a treasure trove of air quality measurements spanning the years 2004 to 2012 in the illustrious locale of Washington Court House, Ohio. Armed with this arsenal of atmospheric data, we sought to illuminate the obscure relationship between air pollution levels and the digital yearning for clandestine departure.

In parallel, our intrepid explorers navigated the labyrinthine expanse of Google Trends analytics with the dexterity of seasoned cartographers, mapping the peaks and valleys of interest in the esoteric topic of "how to fake your own death." The digital footprints left by inquisitive netizens served as our guide, leading us through the convoluted terrain of online searches to capture the zeitgeist of the elusive pursuit of extreme anonymity.

With these disparate yet tantalizing datasets in hand, our intrepid researchers leaped into the scholarly fray armed with a potent arsenal of statistical weaponry. The Pearson correlation coefficient, that trusted stalwart of quantitative inquiry, stood ready to quantify the strength and direction of the relationship between air pollution and the quest for vanishing without a trace. This stalwart measurement tool enabled us to gauge the degree of association between these variables, shedding light on the perplexing interplay between atmospheric conditions and the yearning for elusive anonymity.

But wait, our methodological journey does not end here. In a daring display of statistical prowess, we harnessed the formidable power of regression analysis, plunging headlong into the murky depths of multivariate modeling to disentangle the web of variables that shape the digital landscape of pseudocide proclivities. Armed with our trusty arsenal of p-values, confidence intervals, and coefficient estimates, we sought to uncover the intricate patterns that underlie the surreptitious dance between air pollution and the irresistible allure of digital vanishing acts.

And lo, our methodological escapade culminates in the revelatory unveiling of our findings, presenting a compelling narrative that paints a vivid portrait of the unexpected interplay between environmental factors and the enigmatic echoes of digital desire. Together, through the daring fusion of data mining, statistical acumen, and a touch of whimsy, our methodological journey has illuminated the unexpected correlations and delightful oddities that lurk amidst the humdrum world of scholarly inquiry. Welcome to the daring realm of Pollution Puzzles and Pseudocide, where statistical rigour meets the insatiable allure of the unknown.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Washington Court House, Ohio and Google searches for 'how to fake your own death'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2012, you found a correlation 0.8028809, r-squared of 0.6446178, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Pollution Puzzles and Pseudocide: An Analysis of Air Quality and Interest in Faking Death in Washington Court House, Ohio"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the peculiar link between air quality and the strange yet intriguing surge in Google searches for "how to fake your own death." Utilizing EPA data on air pollution as well as Google Trends analytics, our research team conducted an empirical analysis spanning from 2004 to 2012 in Washington Court House, Ohio. The findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8028809 with a statistically significant p-value less than 0.01, pointing to a positive relationship between air pollution levels and the online quest for extreme anonymity. Our study sheds light on the unanticipated ways in which environmental factors can influence human behavior, and prompts a reevaluation of the phrase "taking a breath of fresh air" in the context of both physical and digital escapades.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the realm of scientific inquiry, we often find ourselves delving into the strange and unexpected connections that lurk amidst the vast sea of data. Our research has led us down a peculiar path, one that treads the thin line between reality and the tantalizing allure of make-believe. While one might assume that air pollution and the desire to orchestrate one's own passing exist in separate spheres, our investigation has unearthed a surprising correlation that challenges conventional wisdom and tickles the fancy of statisticians and skeptics alike.
As we embark on this intellectual adventure, it is important to acknowledge the enigmatic nature of human behavior and its responsiveness to environmental stimuli. Our study centers on the captivating town of Washington Court House, Ohio, a place where the air quality is often overshadowed by the obscurity of its connection to the world of digital anonymity. Why, one might ponder, would the residents of this quaint town show an increased interest in faking their own demise as air pollution levels fluctuate?
With the precision of a skilled researcher and the curiosity of a detective untangling a web of intrigue, our team sought to unravel the mystery that lies at the intersection of air pollution and the online quest for vanishing without a trace. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to measure air quality, and delving into the labyrinthine realm of Google Trends analytics to track searches for "how to fake your own death," we set out to shine a light on an unexplored facet of human behavior.
The convergence of these seemingly disparate variables sparked our scientific curiosity and fueled our quest to decipher the perplexing relationship between air quality and the temptation to orchestrate an exit from the stage of life. As we embark on this journey of scholarly inquiry, brace yourselves for an adventure through the whimsical world of statistical analysis, where unexpected correlations and whimsical observations await at every turn. Join us as we explore the realm of Pollution Puzzles and Pseudocide, and unravel the mystery that lingers in the digital echoes of Washington Court House, Ohio.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation have unveiled a remarkable correlation between air pollution in Washington Court House, Ohio, and the curious surge in Google searches for "how to fake your own death." The correlation coefficient of 0.8028809 indicates a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena, piquing the interest of both researchers and armchair detectives alike.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually encapsulates the intriguing association we uncovered, depicting a striking pattern that tantalizes the imagination and beckons the inquisitive mind. While normally we might expect a breath of fresh air to clear one's thoughts, it seems that in the case of Washington Court House, Ohio, a different kind of air is fueling an unconventional train of thought, leading individuals down a rabbit hole of macabre curiosity.

The r-squared value of 0.6446178 suggests that a sizeable portion of the variance in the interest in faking one's own death can be explained by fluctuations in air pollution levels. It's as if the town's atmosphere is whispering eerie inspirations into the ears of its inhabitants, compelling them to seek digital avenues of escape from the haze that envelops their physical surroundings.

As statisticians, we were both puzzled and amused by this unexpected connection, contemplating the whims of fate that have led us to unveil this correlation. It seems that the winds of statistical significance have carried us to uncharted territory, where the air is thick with mystery and the search for answers leads us down a path less traveled.

The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the robustness of this association, prompting us to consider the implications of such a finding. Could it be that the town's air quality acts as a silent storyteller, compelling its denizens to contemplate the ultimate disappearing act? It's a scientific riddle that tickles the fancy of researchers and the cloaked desires of those who dare to seek the limelight of obscurity.

In conclusion, our research offers a whimsical yet thought-provoking lens through which to view the interplay between environmental factors and human behavior. The unexpected correlation between air pollution and the digital allure of pseudocide challenges traditional notions of cause and effect, reminding us that the world of statistics is teeming with surprises, just waiting to be unraveled.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Washington Court House, Ohio and Google searches for 'how to fake your own death'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Pollution Puzzles and Pseudocide: An Analysis of Air Quality and Interest in Faking Death in Washington Court House, Ohio"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the peculiar link between air quality and the strange yet intriguing surge in Google searches for "how to fake your own death." Utilizing EPA data on air pollution as well as Google Trends analytics, our research team conducted an empirical analysis spanning from 2004 to 2012 in Washington Court House, Ohio. The findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8028809 with a statistically significant p-value less than 0.01, pointing to a positive relationship between air pollution levels and the online quest for extreme anonymity. Our study sheds light on the unanticipated ways in which environmental factors can influence human behavior, and prompts a reevaluation of the phrase "taking a breath of fresh air" in the context of both physical and digital escapades.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In our exploration of the enigmatic connection between air quality and the peculiar, if not morbid, fascination with faking one's own death, we delve into a body of literature that spans the fields of environmental science, psychology, and criminology. The initial search for scholarly works promptly led us to the meticulous studies of Smith et al. (2010), who examined the impact of air pollution on human health and behavior. Surprisingly, however, our pursuit also uncovered a series of curiously titled non-fiction works, including "The Art of Disappearing: Faking Your Death and Vanishing Without a Trace" by Jane Doe, which, while not a scholarly source, nevertheless stands as a testament to the enduring allure of clandestine escapades.
Moreover, our reading journey took an unexpected turn as we stumbled upon fictional narratives that, albeit purely figments of imagination, portrayed the intriguing allure of assuming a new identity and vanishing into obscurity. Among these works were "The Disappearance" by J.K. Rowling, whose protagonist embarks on a daring journey of self-erasure, and "Gone Girl" by Gillian Flynn, a thrilling tale of vanishing acts and calculated deception that resonated with our inquiry.
Furthermore, in the pursuit of a deeper understanding of the human psyche and the deceptive allure of pseudocide, our research team found itself indulging in a rather eclectic mix of popular television shows. Programs such as "How to Get Away with Murder" and "Dexter" presented an unusual, though not entirely irrelevant, source of inspiration in our quest to unravel the curious connection between air pollution and the internet's interest in orchestrating a dramatic departure from the mortal coil.
As we immersed ourselves in these diverse sources, punctuated by both serious scholarship and imaginative narratives, it became increasingly evident that the allure of faking one's own death extends beyond the pages of scholarly journals and into the whimsical realm of fiction and entertainment. This interdisciplinary foray into the literature surrounding our research topic provided a refreshing perspective, serving as a gentle reminder that even the most peculiar phenomena are often intertwined with the playful nuance of human imagination.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation have unveiled a remarkable correlation between air pollution in Washington Court House, Ohio, and the curious surge in Google searches for "how to fake your own death." The correlation coefficient of 0.8028809 indicates a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena, piquing the interest of both researchers and armchair detectives alike.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually encapsulates the intriguing association we uncovered, depicting a striking pattern that tantalizes the imagination and beckons the inquisitive mind. While normally we might expect a breath of fresh air to clear one's thoughts, it seems that in the case of Washington Court House, Ohio, a different kind of air is fueling an unconventional train of thought, leading individuals down a rabbit hole of macabre curiosity.
The r-squared value of 0.6446178 suggests that a sizeable portion of the variance in the interest in faking one's own death can be explained by fluctuations in air pollution levels. It's as if the town's atmosphere is whispering eerie inspirations into the ears of its inhabitants, compelling them to seek digital avenues of escape from the haze that envelops their physical surroundings.
As statisticians, we were both puzzled and amused by this unexpected connection, contemplating the whims of fate that have led us to unveil this correlation. It seems that the winds of statistical significance have carried us to uncharted territory, where the air is thick with mystery and the search for answers leads us down a path less traveled.
The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the robustness of this association, prompting us to consider the implications of such a finding. Could it be that the town's air quality acts as a silent storyteller, compelling its denizens to contemplate the ultimate disappearing act? It's a scientific riddle that tickles the fancy of researchers and the cloaked desires of those who dare to seek the limelight of obscurity.
In conclusion, our research offers a whimsical yet thought-provoking lens through which to view the interplay between environmental factors and human behavior. The unexpected correlation between air pollution and the digital allure of pseudocide challenges traditional notions of cause and effect, reminding us that the world of statistics is teeming with surprises, just waiting to be unraveled.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study have opened a veritable Pandora's box of peculiarities, shedding light on the unexpected relationship between air pollution and the engrossing surge in Google searches for "how to fake your own death" in Washington Court House, Ohio. Our results not only corroborate the previous work of Smith et al. (2010) regarding the impact of air pollution on human behavior but also add a newfound layer of whimsy to the scholarly discourse.

Indeed, the statistical analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8028809, which stands as a testament to the captivating influence of air quality on the digital quest for anonymity. It seems that the town's atmosphere, thick with invisible particles, has managed to catalyze an unanticipated surge in searches for strategies to elude the shackles of one's identity. In a twist worthy of a suspense novel, our study demonstrates that the air in Washington Court House, Ohio, is not just laden with particulate matter, but also with enigmatic inspiration that fuels the virtual odyssey for clandestine liberation.

Moreover, the scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually encapsulates the intriguing association we uncovered, depicting a pattern that is as confounding as it is captivating. It's almost as if the data points are engaged in a dramatic dance, twirling and pirouetting to the silent melody of the town's atmospheric idiosyncrasies. One cannot help but marvel at the unexpected waltz between environmental factors and the digital yearning for escapism, a partnership that transcends conventional understandings of cause and effect.

The r-squared value of 0.6446178 provides further fodder for contemplation, suggesting that a substantial portion of the variance in the interest in faking one's own death can be attributed to fluctuations in air pollution levels. It's as if the town's air quality is a mischievous jester, whispering whimsical notions into the ears of its residents and beckoning them to embark on a virtual masquerade. Such findings underscore the intricate interplay between the physical and the digital realms, challenging us to reconsider the boundaries that demarcate the domains of science and serendipity.

As we contemplate the implications of these unexpected findings, it becomes evident that the world of research is as playful as it is profound, teeming with surprises that invite us to ponder the duality of statistical significance and lyrical intrigue. Our study, despite its lighthearted undertones, prompts a reevaluation of the phrase "taking a breath of fresh air," inviting us to consider its implications not only in the context of physical respite but also in the allure of digital vanishing acts.

In light of our research, it is clear that the tale of air pollution and the internet's fascination with pseudocide is a narrative shrouded in whimsy, challenging us to embrace the enchanting dance of statistical inference and digital yearning. The findings of this study not only contribute to the expansion of scholarly discourse but also serve as a quirky reminder that, in the realm of research, the most unexpected phenomena often harbor the most intriguing revelations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Washington Court House, Ohio and Google searches for 'how to fake your own death'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Pollution Puzzles and Pseudocide: An Analysis of Air Quality and Interest in Faking Death in Washington Court House, Ohio"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the peculiar link between air quality and the strange yet intriguing surge in Google searches for "how to fake your own death." Utilizing EPA data on air pollution as well as Google Trends analytics, our research team conducted an empirical analysis spanning from 2004 to 2012 in Washington Court House, Ohio. The findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8028809 with a statistically significant p-value less than 0.01, pointing to a positive relationship between air pollution levels and the online quest for extreme anonymity. Our study sheds light on the unanticipated ways in which environmental factors can influence human behavior, and prompts a reevaluation of the phrase "taking a breath of fresh air" in the context of both physical and digital escapades.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the realm of scientific inquiry, we often find ourselves delving into the strange and unexpected connections that lurk amidst the vast sea of data. Our research has led us down a peculiar path, one that treads the thin line between reality and the tantalizing allure of make-believe. While one might assume that air pollution and the desire to orchestrate one's own passing exist in separate spheres, our investigation has unearthed a surprising correlation that challenges conventional wisdom and tickles the fancy of statisticians and skeptics alike.
As we embark on this intellectual adventure, it is important to acknowledge the enigmatic nature of human behavior and its responsiveness to environmental stimuli. Our study centers on the captivating town of Washington Court House, Ohio, a place where the air quality is often overshadowed by the obscurity of its connection to the world of digital anonymity. Why, one might ponder, would the residents of this quaint town show an increased interest in faking their own demise as air pollution levels fluctuate?
With the precision of a skilled researcher and the curiosity of a detective untangling a web of intrigue, our team sought to unravel the mystery that lies at the intersection of air pollution and the online quest for vanishing without a trace. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to measure air quality, and delving into the labyrinthine realm of Google Trends analytics to track searches for "how to fake your own death," we set out to shine a light on an unexplored facet of human behavior.
The convergence of these seemingly disparate variables sparked our scientific curiosity and fueled our quest to decipher the perplexing relationship between air quality and the temptation to orchestrate an exit from the stage of life. As we embark on this journey of scholarly inquiry, brace yourselves for an adventure through the whimsical world of statistical analysis, where unexpected correlations and whimsical observations await at every turn. Join us as we explore the realm of Pollution Puzzles and Pseudocide, and unravel the mystery that lingers in the digital echoes of Washington Court House, Ohio.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation have unveiled a remarkable correlation between air pollution in Washington Court House, Ohio, and the curious surge in Google searches for "how to fake your own death." The correlation coefficient of 0.8028809 indicates a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena, piquing the interest of both researchers and armchair detectives alike.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually encapsulates the intriguing association we uncovered, depicting a striking pattern that tantalizes the imagination and beckons the inquisitive mind. While normally we might expect a breath of fresh air to clear one's thoughts, it seems that in the case of Washington Court House, Ohio, a different kind of air is fueling an unconventional train of thought, leading individuals down a rabbit hole of macabre curiosity.
The r-squared value of 0.6446178 suggests that a sizeable portion of the variance in the interest in faking one's own death can be explained by fluctuations in air pollution levels. It's as if the town's atmosphere is whispering eerie inspirations into the ears of its inhabitants, compelling them to seek digital avenues of escape from the haze that envelops their physical surroundings.
As statisticians, we were both puzzled and amused by this unexpected connection, contemplating the whims of fate that have led us to unveil this correlation. It seems that the winds of statistical significance have carried us to uncharted territory, where the air is thick with mystery and the search for answers leads us down a path less traveled.
The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the robustness of this association, prompting us to consider the implications of such a finding. Could it be that the town's air quality acts as a silent storyteller, compelling its denizens to contemplate the ultimate disappearing act? It's a scientific riddle that tickles the fancy of researchers and the cloaked desires of those who dare to seek the limelight of obscurity.
In conclusion, our research offers a whimsical yet thought-provoking lens through which to view the interplay between environmental factors and human behavior. The unexpected correlation between air pollution and the digital allure of pseudocide challenges traditional notions of cause and effect, reminding us that the world of statistics is teeming with surprises, just waiting to be unraveled.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In closing, our quirky exploration of the link between air pollution and the intriguing uptick in Google searches for "how to fake your own death" in Washington Court House, Ohio has left us both bemused and bewildered. As we reflect on our statistical escapade through the whimsical world of unexpected correlations, it is clear that our findings have tickled the funny bones of both researchers and armchair detectives alike.

The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8028809 serves as a gentle nudge, reminding us that even in the realm of scientific inquiry, the air we breathe—both metaphorically and literally—can whisper peculiar inspirations into the recesses of our statistical minds. Our scatterplot (Fig. 1) paints a picture that could rival any mystery novel, with the tangy scent of statistical significance teasing our nostrils and prompting us to ponder the enigma of it all.

The r-squared value of 0.6446178 invites us to consider the role of environmental factors in nurturing the fertile ground where peculiar curiosities take root. It seems the residents of Washington Court House, Ohio are not just breathing in air; they are inhaling the whims of statistical fate, serenading them with a siren song that leads to a digital quest for anonymous vanishing acts.

As we bid adieu to this intriguing saga, it is with great certainty that we assert: no further research is needed in this area. After all, in the whimsical world of statistical inquiry, sometimes a touch of mystery is just what we need to remind us that even the most peculiar correlations can captivate our scientific souls.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Pollution Puzzles and Pseudocide: An Analysis of Air Quality and Interest in Faking Death in Washington Court House, Ohio. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Ecological Enigmas and Existential Escapades


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Pollution Puzzles and Pseudocide: An Analysis of Air Quality and Interest in Faking Death in Washington Court House, Ohio. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Quirky Environmental and Behavioral Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Pollution Puzzles and Pseudocide: An Analysis of Air Quality and Interest in Faking Death in Washington Court House, Ohio with an abstract of In this paper, we investigate the peculiar link between air quality and the strange yet intriguing surge in Google searches for "how to fake your own death." Utilizing EPA data on air pollution as well as Google Trends analytics, our research team conducted an empirical analysis spanning from 2004 to 2012 in Washington Court House, Ohio. The findings reveal a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8028809 with a statistically significant p-value less than 0.01, pointing to a positive relationship between air pollution levels and the online quest for extreme anonymity. Our study sheds light on the unanticipated ways in which environmental factors can influence human behavior, and prompts a reevaluation of the phrase "taking a breath of fresh air" in the context of both physical and digital escapades.

ChatGPT:

air quality, air pollution, Google searches, faking death, Washington Court House Ohio, EPA data, Google Trends, environmental factors, human behavior

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Washington Court House, Ohio
Detailed data title: Percentage of days 'unhealthy' or worse air quality in Washington Court House, OH
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Washington Court House, Ohio

Google searches for 'how to fake your own death'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'how to fake your own death' (Worldwide), with quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'how to fake your own death'

Correlation r = 0.8028809 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6446178 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 64.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'how to fake your own death') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Washington Court House, Ohio) over the 9 years from 2004 through 2012.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0092. 0.0091788225192219080000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.8 in 0.92% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 109 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 8 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 8 because we have two variables measured over a period of 9 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.3, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200420052006200720082009201020112012
Air pollution in Washington Court House, Ohio (Bad air quality days)00.005665720000000.00285714
Google searches for 'how to fake your own death' (Rel. search volume)15.583325.083313.66676.2510.166712.416714.514.515.3333




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0,0.00566572,0,0,0,0,0,0,0.00285714,])
array_2 = np.array([15.5833,25.0833,13.6667,6.25,10.1667,12.4167,14.5,14.5,15.3333,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Washington Court House, Ohio"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'how to fake your own death'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are top-notch!


Correlation ID: 2706 · Black Variable ID: 22274 · Red Variable ID: 1494
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0