about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,538 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Washington Court House, Ohio and the second variable is Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2012, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As air pollution in Washington Court House, Ohio increased, it created stronger wind currents. These winds, filled with smog particles, inadvertently boosted Lukas Podolski's shots with some unconventional spin, leading to an uptick in his goal count. You could say he really 'fouled' the air with those polluted shots! Now that's what I call a smoggy assist!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that shows Lukas Podolski on a soccer field in Washington Court House, Ohio. The environment should be portrayed with a haze due to pollution, and the sky should feature a muted glow. Lukas Podolski is depicted with a determined expression as he kicks the ball with an extra burst of energy, overcoming the resistance from the polluted air. The visual should convey a sense of determination and athleticism as he scores multiple goals in the match. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Washington Court House, Ohio and Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A photo-realistic image Concept art a meme Hyper-realistic Cybernetic art
ChatGPT: A photo-realistic image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Washington Court House, Ohio and Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count, in the following situation: The increase in air pollution led to thicker air, which provided more resistance to the soccer ball. This resistance forced Lukas Podolski to kick harder, ultimately improving his goal count. In this case, it seems like the dirty air really helped him clean up on the field!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Washington Court House, Ohio, the air is thick with pollution. The hazy sky cast a muted glow over the soccer field where Lukas Podolski, with determination on his face, kicks the ball with an extra burst of energy. With each powerful kick, the resistance from the polluted air pushes the ball forward, propelling him to score multiple goals in the match.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A photo-realistic image ] and depicting this scene: In Washington Court House, Ohio, the air is thick with pollution. The hazy sky cast a muted glow over the soccer field where Lukas Podolski, with determination on his face, kicks the ball with an extra burst of energy. With each powerful kick, the resistance from the polluted air pushes the ball forward, propelling him to score multiple goals in the match. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that shows Lukas Podolski on a soccer field in Washington Court House, Ohio. The environment should be portrayed with a haze due to pollution, and the sky should feature a muted glow. Lukas Podolski is depicted with a determined expression as he kicks the ball with an extra burst of energy, overcoming the resistance from the polluted air. The visual should convey a sense of determination and athleticism as he scores multiple goals in the match.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Air pollution in Washington Court House, Ohio caused Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Air Pollution and Podolski's Prolificity: A Goal-scoring Correlation

The Journal of Environmental Soccer Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Washington Court House, Ohio and Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9109714 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2012.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Air Pollution and Podolski's Prolificity: A Goal-scoring Correlation"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the unexpected and whimsical connection between air pollution levels in Washington Court House, Ohio, and the domestic match goal count of the renowned footballer, Lukas Podolski. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, an intriguing correlation coefficient of 0.9109714 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 were discovered for the period spanning from 2004 to 2012. Our findings highlight a surprising relationship between environmental factors and athletic achievements, providing an amusing and thought-provoking insight into the potential influence of air quality on sports performance. This research not only presents a statistically sound analysis but also offers a lighthearted juxtaposition of seemingly unrelated phenomena, encouraging further exploration into the quirky intersections of environmental conditions and sporting prowess.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Washington Court House, Ohio and Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Air Pollution and Podolski's Prolificity: A Goal-scoring Correlation"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the unexpected and whimsical connection between air pollution levels in Washington Court House, Ohio, and the domestic match goal count of the renowned footballer, Lukas Podolski. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, an intriguing correlation coefficient of 0.9109714 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 were discovered for the period spanning from 2004 to 2012. Our findings highlight a surprising relationship between environmental factors and athletic achievements, providing an amusing and thought-provoking insight into the potential influence of air quality on sports performance. This research not only presents a statistically sound analysis but also offers a lighthearted juxtaposition of seemingly unrelated phenomena, encouraging further exploration into the quirky intersections of environmental conditions and sporting prowess.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the realm of statistical analysis and academic inquiry, it is often the case that unexpected correlations emerge, prompting researchers to pause and consider the whimsical dance of variables. In this paper, we delve into the peculiar and seemingly improbable relationship between air pollution levels in Washington Court House, Ohio, and the domestic match goal count of none other than the illustrious Lukas Podolski. While the initial premise may elicit a chuckle or a quizzical eyebrow raise, it is precisely these offbeat connections that spark curiosity and drive scientific inquiry.

The endeavor of investigating such an association necessitates a careful and rigorous approach, rooted in the principles of statistical analysis and environmental research. As we embark on this peculiar journey, it is paramount to appreciate the multifaceted nature of our investigation. On one hand, we grapple with the tangible and quantifiable metrics of air pollution levels, drawing upon data gleaned from the esteemed Environmental Protection Agency. On the other hand, we delve into the intangible realm of athletic achievement, seeking to measure the goal-scoring prowess of a celebrated footballer notorious for his thunderous strikes and unyielding determination on the pitch.

The confluence of these divergent variables beckons us to consider the interplay of environmental factors and athletic performance, beckoning us to unlock the subtle mysteries that might be hiding in plain sight. While statistical rigor and methodological precision undoubtedly underpin our efforts, we invite the reader to embrace the delightful irony and levity inherent in this pursuit. After all, who would have conceived that the quality of the air in a small Ohio town might hold sway over the goal-scoring exploits of a revered footballing figure?

As we navigate this intricate and unexpected terrain, let us approach the task at hand with due diligence and scholarly rigor – and perhaps a dash of lighthearted mirth. For in the whimsical juxtaposition of air pollution and athletic prowess, we may yet uncover a tapestry of statistical intrigue and amusing anecdotes, showcasing the peculiar and often serendipitous nature of scientific investigation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Washington Court House, Ohio and Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Air Pollution and Podolski's Prolificity: A Goal-scoring Correlation"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the unexpected and whimsical connection between air pollution levels in Washington Court House, Ohio, and the domestic match goal count of the renowned footballer, Lukas Podolski. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, an intriguing correlation coefficient of 0.9109714 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 were discovered for the period spanning from 2004 to 2012. Our findings highlight a surprising relationship between environmental factors and athletic achievements, providing an amusing and thought-provoking insight into the potential influence of air quality on sports performance. This research not only presents a statistically sound analysis but also offers a lighthearted juxtaposition of seemingly unrelated phenomena, encouraging further exploration into the quirky intersections of environmental conditions and sporting prowess.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of statistical analysis and academic inquiry, it is often the case that unexpected correlations emerge, prompting researchers to pause and consider the whimsical dance of variables. In this paper, we delve into the peculiar and seemingly improbable relationship between air pollution levels in Washington Court House, Ohio, and the domestic match goal count of none other than the illustrious Lukas Podolski. While the initial premise may elicit a chuckle or a quizzical eyebrow raise, it is precisely these offbeat connections that spark curiosity and drive scientific inquiry.
The endeavor of investigating such an association necessitates a careful and rigorous approach, rooted in the principles of statistical analysis and environmental research. As we embark on this peculiar journey, it is paramount to appreciate the multifaceted nature of our investigation. On one hand, we grapple with the tangible and quantifiable metrics of air pollution levels, drawing upon data gleaned from the esteemed Environmental Protection Agency. On the other hand, we delve into the intangible realm of athletic achievement, seeking to measure the goal-scoring prowess of a celebrated footballer notorious for his thunderous strikes and unyielding determination on the pitch.
The confluence of these divergent variables beckons us to consider the interplay of environmental factors and athletic performance, beckoning us to unlock the subtle mysteries that might be hiding in plain sight. While statistical rigor and methodological precision undoubtedly underpin our efforts, we invite the reader to embrace the delightful irony and levity inherent in this pursuit. After all, who would have conceived that the quality of the air in a small Ohio town might hold sway over the goal-scoring exploits of a revered footballing figure?
As we navigate this intricate and unexpected terrain, let us approach the task at hand with due diligence and scholarly rigor – and perhaps a dash of lighthearted mirth. For in the whimsical juxtaposition of air pollution and athletic prowess, we may yet uncover a tapestry of statistical intrigue and amusing anecdotes, showcasing the peculiar and often serendipitous nature of scientific investigation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The unexpected connection between air pollution in Washington Court House, Ohio, and Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count is a topic that has seen a dearth of scholarly attention. Despite its whimsical and seemingly improbable nature, a growing body of literature has emerged, seeking to unravel the enigmatic relationship between environmental quality and athletic prowess.

Smith et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of air pollution levels and their potential impact on human performance in various spheres, ranging from cognitive function to physical endurance. While their study did not directly explore the correlation with football match goal counts, their findings lay the groundwork for considering the broader implications of air quality on human activity. The authors highlight the imperative of mitigating air pollution for societal well-being, inadvertently setting the stage for the quirky synthesis of environmental factors and sports performance.

Doe and Jones (2017) further contributed to this discourse by examining the psychological and physiological effects of air pollution on athletes. Their study illuminated the adverse consequences of pollution on respiratory function and overall health, demonstrating the pervasive reach of environmental factors into the domain of physical exertion. While their work primarily focused on elite athletes, the implications for professional footballers, such as Podolski, beckon us to ponder the potential influence of air quality on their on-field achievements.

Turning to the realm of non-fiction literature, the seminal work "The Air We Breathe" by Clean (2018) provides a comprehensive overview of air quality and its ramifications for human health and well-being. While not specifically addressing athletic performance, the book underscores the pervasive impact of air pollution, laying the groundwork for considering its influence on diverse facets of human activity.

In a similar vein, "Pollution and Its Discontents" by Green (2016) delves into the societal and individual repercussions of environmental degradation. Though the book predominantly delves into the socio-economic dimensions of pollution, its insights prompt us to contemplate the broader consequences of environmental factors on human behavior, including the captivating intersection of air pollution and athletic achievements.

Venturing into the realm of fiction, Orwell's "The Smoke Eaters" (1948) immerses the reader in a dystopian world characterized by suffocating air pollution, offering a curious parallel to our exploration of atmospheric influences on sporting prowess. Furthermore, Huxley's "Brave New World" (1932) presents a thought-provoking narrative set against a backdrop of environmental manipulation, prompting contemplation of the intriguing interplay between external conditions and personal performance.

In a departure from conventional academic sources, the authors also engaged in a light-hearted foray beyond traditional literature, perusing the backs of shampoo bottles in a whimsical bid to uncover unorthodox perspectives on air pollution and athletic achievement. While this unconventional approach yielded more lather than substance, it nevertheless underscores the delightfully diverse avenues of inquiry that this research endeavor has ventured into.

As we synthesize these eclectic sources and embark on our own investigation, we are reminded of the intricate tapestry of influences that shape human endeavors, from the palpable impact of environmental factors to the tantalizing realm of athletic feats. This lighthearted juxtaposition invites us to weave a narrative that traverses the rigorous terrain of academic research while embracing the delightful and unexpected intersections of the human experience.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Washington Court House, Ohio and Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia . You used data from 2004 to 2012

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Air Pollution and Podolski's Prolificity: A Goal-scoring Correlation"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the unexpected and whimsical connection between air pollution levels in Washington Court House, Ohio, and the domestic match goal count of the renowned footballer, Lukas Podolski. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, an intriguing correlation coefficient of 0.9109714 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 were discovered for the period spanning from 2004 to 2012. Our findings highlight a surprising relationship between environmental factors and athletic achievements, providing an amusing and thought-provoking insight into the potential influence of air quality on sports performance. This research not only presents a statistically sound analysis but also offers a lighthearted juxtaposition of seemingly unrelated phenomena, encouraging further exploration into the quirky intersections of environmental conditions and sporting prowess.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of statistical analysis and academic inquiry, it is often the case that unexpected correlations emerge, prompting researchers to pause and consider the whimsical dance of variables. In this paper, we delve into the peculiar and seemingly improbable relationship between air pollution levels in Washington Court House, Ohio, and the domestic match goal count of none other than the illustrious Lukas Podolski. While the initial premise may elicit a chuckle or a quizzical eyebrow raise, it is precisely these offbeat connections that spark curiosity and drive scientific inquiry.
The endeavor of investigating such an association necessitates a careful and rigorous approach, rooted in the principles of statistical analysis and environmental research. As we embark on this peculiar journey, it is paramount to appreciate the multifaceted nature of our investigation. On one hand, we grapple with the tangible and quantifiable metrics of air pollution levels, drawing upon data gleaned from the esteemed Environmental Protection Agency. On the other hand, we delve into the intangible realm of athletic achievement, seeking to measure the goal-scoring prowess of a celebrated footballer notorious for his thunderous strikes and unyielding determination on the pitch.
The confluence of these divergent variables beckons us to consider the interplay of environmental factors and athletic performance, beckoning us to unlock the subtle mysteries that might be hiding in plain sight. While statistical rigor and methodological precision undoubtedly underpin our efforts, we invite the reader to embrace the delightful irony and levity inherent in this pursuit. After all, who would have conceived that the quality of the air in a small Ohio town might hold sway over the goal-scoring exploits of a revered footballing figure?
As we navigate this intricate and unexpected terrain, let us approach the task at hand with due diligence and scholarly rigor – and perhaps a dash of lighthearted mirth. For in the whimsical juxtaposition of air pollution and athletic prowess, we may yet uncover a tapestry of statistical intrigue and amusing anecdotes, showcasing the peculiar and often serendipitous nature of scientific investigation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To explore the enigmatic and offbeat correlation between air pollution levels in Washington Court House, Ohio, and the domestic match goal count of the venerable Lukas Podolski, an assortment of rigorous and, dare I say, quirky research methodologies were undertaken. The data collection process involved a synthesis of datasets obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the vast troves of knowledge housed within the catacombs of Wikipedia. Our frenetic quest for insight spanned the years 2004 to 2012, as we sought to capture the ebbs and flows of both air quality and Podolski's goal-scoring escapades.

The air pollution data, a veritable treasure trove of chemical compositions and atmospheric delectations, was sourced from the venerable Environmental Protection Agency. Variables such as particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5), ozone (O3), sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and carbon monoxide (CO) were extracted with fervor and gusto, much like the intrepid explorer unearthing lost artifacts from a bygone era.

In tandem with this atmospheric odyssey, the domestic match goal count of the indomitable Lukas Podolski was meticulously tabulated from the extensive fount of knowledge that is Wikipedia. As we delved deep into the labyrinthine corridors of internet wisdom, we navigated past the siren songs of anecdotal trivia and emerged with a robust compilation of Podolski's goal-scoring feats within the specified time frame.

Now, dear reader, one might pause to question the synchronicity of these disparate data sources and the rationale behind their curious convergence. The answer lies in the gathering storm of statistical coherence, as we sought to weave a narrative thread from the zephyrs of pollutant concentrations to the thunderous volleys of Podolski's goals.

Preceding the conflation of these datasets, an air of methodological rigor and statistical finesse was employed to ensure the primacy of our findings. The statistical analysis unfurled with such precision and grace that it would rival the most finely-tuned orchestral performance. A series of correlation analyses, replete with Pearson's r and, dare I say, Spearman's rho, were conducted to unveil the intricate dance of variables and hint at the tantalizing connection hiding in the recesses of data.

Furthermore, a multifaceted regression analysis was executed, akin to peering through a kaleidoscope of variables to discern the subtle hues of significance. The relationships between air pollutant concentrations and Podolski's goal count were unveiled with such finesse that one might imagine the statistical software itself let out a satisfied chuckle at the sight of such revelatory p-values and coefficients.

Through this measured and at times whimsical approach, our research endeavors stood at the crossroads of statistical inquiry and sporting conundrums, poised to unravel the enigmatic interplay between environmental caprice and the exploits of a renowned football luminary. As we wade further into the depths of our results, it is with a wry smile and a knowing nod that we present the fruits of our methodological whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Washington Court House, Ohio and Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia .

For the time period 2004 to 2012, you found a correlation 0.9109714, r-squared of 0.8298688, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Air Pollution and Podolski's Prolificity: A Goal-scoring Correlation"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the unexpected and whimsical connection between air pollution levels in Washington Court House, Ohio, and the domestic match goal count of the renowned footballer, Lukas Podolski. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, an intriguing correlation coefficient of 0.9109714 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 were discovered for the period spanning from 2004 to 2012. Our findings highlight a surprising relationship between environmental factors and athletic achievements, providing an amusing and thought-provoking insight into the potential influence of air quality on sports performance. This research not only presents a statistically sound analysis but also offers a lighthearted juxtaposition of seemingly unrelated phenomena, encouraging further exploration into the quirky intersections of environmental conditions and sporting prowess.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the realm of statistical analysis and academic inquiry, it is often the case that unexpected correlations emerge, prompting researchers to pause and consider the whimsical dance of variables. In this paper, we delve into the peculiar and seemingly improbable relationship between air pollution levels in Washington Court House, Ohio, and the domestic match goal count of none other than the illustrious Lukas Podolski. While the initial premise may elicit a chuckle or a quizzical eyebrow raise, it is precisely these offbeat connections that spark curiosity and drive scientific inquiry.
The endeavor of investigating such an association necessitates a careful and rigorous approach, rooted in the principles of statistical analysis and environmental research. As we embark on this peculiar journey, it is paramount to appreciate the multifaceted nature of our investigation. On one hand, we grapple with the tangible and quantifiable metrics of air pollution levels, drawing upon data gleaned from the esteemed Environmental Protection Agency. On the other hand, we delve into the intangible realm of athletic achievement, seeking to measure the goal-scoring prowess of a celebrated footballer notorious for his thunderous strikes and unyielding determination on the pitch.
The confluence of these divergent variables beckons us to consider the interplay of environmental factors and athletic performance, beckoning us to unlock the subtle mysteries that might be hiding in plain sight. While statistical rigor and methodological precision undoubtedly underpin our efforts, we invite the reader to embrace the delightful irony and levity inherent in this pursuit. After all, who would have conceived that the quality of the air in a small Ohio town might hold sway over the goal-scoring exploits of a revered footballing figure?
As we navigate this intricate and unexpected terrain, let us approach the task at hand with due diligence and scholarly rigor – and perhaps a dash of lighthearted mirth. For in the whimsical juxtaposition of air pollution and athletic prowess, we may yet uncover a tapestry of statistical intrigue and amusing anecdotes, showcasing the peculiar and often serendipitous nature of scientific investigation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data collected from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia revealed a captivating and remarkably robust correlation between air pollution levels in Washington Court House, Ohio, and Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count for the period from 2004 to 2012. The correlation coefficient of 0.9109714 suggests a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This conspicuous correlation, which exhibited an r-squared value of 0.8298688, surpassed the conventional threshold for statistical significance with a p-value of less than 0.01.

Fig. 1 illustrates the compelling relationship between air pollution levels and Lukas Podolski's goal-scoring exploits, showcasing a visually striking scatterplot that attests to the robustness of the correlation. One cannot help but marvel at the alignment of data points, harmonizing in a symphony of statistical significance and whimsical intrigue.

The findings from this investigation not only affirm the unexpected and whimsical link between environmental conditions and athletic achievements but also underscore the potential for nuanced interplay between seemingly unrelated phenomena. While the statistical robustness of the correlation demands acknowledgment and respect, the fortuitous nature of this discovery elicits a sense of mirth and wonder, challenging established notions and beckoning researchers to explore the more peculiar dimensions of statistical analysis and environmental influence on athletic performance.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Washington Court House, Ohio and Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Air Pollution and Podolski's Prolificity: A Goal-scoring Correlation"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the unexpected and whimsical connection between air pollution levels in Washington Court House, Ohio, and the domestic match goal count of the renowned footballer, Lukas Podolski. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, an intriguing correlation coefficient of 0.9109714 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 were discovered for the period spanning from 2004 to 2012. Our findings highlight a surprising relationship between environmental factors and athletic achievements, providing an amusing and thought-provoking insight into the potential influence of air quality on sports performance. This research not only presents a statistically sound analysis but also offers a lighthearted juxtaposition of seemingly unrelated phenomena, encouraging further exploration into the quirky intersections of environmental conditions and sporting prowess.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The unexpected connection between air pollution in Washington Court House, Ohio, and Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count is a topic that has seen a dearth of scholarly attention. Despite its whimsical and seemingly improbable nature, a growing body of literature has emerged, seeking to unravel the enigmatic relationship between environmental quality and athletic prowess.
Smith et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of air pollution levels and their potential impact on human performance in various spheres, ranging from cognitive function to physical endurance. While their study did not directly explore the correlation with football match goal counts, their findings lay the groundwork for considering the broader implications of air quality on human activity. The authors highlight the imperative of mitigating air pollution for societal well-being, inadvertently setting the stage for the quirky synthesis of environmental factors and sports performance.
Doe and Jones (2017) further contributed to this discourse by examining the psychological and physiological effects of air pollution on athletes. Their study illuminated the adverse consequences of pollution on respiratory function and overall health, demonstrating the pervasive reach of environmental factors into the domain of physical exertion. While their work primarily focused on elite athletes, the implications for professional footballers, such as Podolski, beckon us to ponder the potential influence of air quality on their on-field achievements.
Turning to the realm of non-fiction literature, the seminal work "The Air We Breathe" by Clean (2018) provides a comprehensive overview of air quality and its ramifications for human health and well-being. While not specifically addressing athletic performance, the book underscores the pervasive impact of air pollution, laying the groundwork for considering its influence on diverse facets of human activity.
In a similar vein, "Pollution and Its Discontents" by Green (2016) delves into the societal and individual repercussions of environmental degradation. Though the book predominantly delves into the socio-economic dimensions of pollution, its insights prompt us to contemplate the broader consequences of environmental factors on human behavior, including the captivating intersection of air pollution and athletic achievements.
Venturing into the realm of fiction, Orwell's "The Smoke Eaters" (1948) immerses the reader in a dystopian world characterized by suffocating air pollution, offering a curious parallel to our exploration of atmospheric influences on sporting prowess. Furthermore, Huxley's "Brave New World" (1932) presents a thought-provoking narrative set against a backdrop of environmental manipulation, prompting contemplation of the intriguing interplay between external conditions and personal performance.
In a departure from conventional academic sources, the authors also engaged in a light-hearted foray beyond traditional literature, perusing the backs of shampoo bottles in a whimsical bid to uncover unorthodox perspectives on air pollution and athletic achievement. While this unconventional approach yielded more lather than substance, it nevertheless underscores the delightfully diverse avenues of inquiry that this research endeavor has ventured into.
As we synthesize these eclectic sources and embark on our own investigation, we are reminded of the intricate tapestry of influences that shape human endeavors, from the palpable impact of environmental factors to the tantalizing realm of athletic feats. This lighthearted juxtaposition invites us to weave a narrative that traverses the rigorous terrain of academic research while embracing the delightful and unexpected intersections of the human experience.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia revealed a captivating and remarkably robust correlation between air pollution levels in Washington Court House, Ohio, and Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count for the period from 2004 to 2012. The correlation coefficient of 0.9109714 suggests a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This conspicuous correlation, which exhibited an r-squared value of 0.8298688, surpassed the conventional threshold for statistical significance with a p-value of less than 0.01.
Fig. 1 illustrates the compelling relationship between air pollution levels and Lukas Podolski's goal-scoring exploits, showcasing a visually striking scatterplot that attests to the robustness of the correlation. One cannot help but marvel at the alignment of data points, harmonizing in a symphony of statistical significance and whimsical intrigue.
The findings from this investigation not only affirm the unexpected and whimsical link between environmental conditions and athletic achievements but also underscore the potential for nuanced interplay between seemingly unrelated phenomena. While the statistical robustness of the correlation demands acknowledgment and respect, the fortuitous nature of this discovery elicits a sense of mirth and wonder, challenging established notions and beckoning researchers to explore the more peculiar dimensions of statistical analysis and environmental influence on athletic performance.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study compellingly corroborate the curious correlation between air pollution levels in Washington Court House, Ohio, and Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count. Our findings not only substantiate the whimsical linkage posited in the literature review but also unveil the unexpected harmony between environmental factors and sporting accomplishments, demonstrating the delightful and befuddling nature of statistical inquiry into seemingly unrelated phenomena.

The intriguing coherence between air pollution and Podolski's goal-scoring prowess is a testament to the multifaceted interplay of factors that underpin sporting achievements. As we reflect on the palpable alignment of data points in the scatterplot, one cannot help but marvel at the statistical serendipity that has bestowed upon us this whimsical revelation. This unexpected correlation, while demanding rigorous scrutiny and methodological acumen, also beckons us to appreciate the unanticipated twists and turns that research often unfurls, akin to a thrilling journey through the statistical wilderness.

The robustness of the correlation coefficient and the statistical significance of the p-value not only lend credence to the validity of our findings but also invite us to revel in the uncanny symbiosis of environmental variables and athletic accomplishments. The palpable rapport between air pollution and Podolski's goal-scoring exploits challenges traditional paradigms of sporting performance, prompting us to embrace the zany and unexplored domains of statistical inquiry with a sense of buoyant curiosity and statistical zing.

As we bask in the revelry of this delightful discovery, it is imperative to acknowledge the fortuitous confluence of statistical significance and whimsical intrigue that has germinated from this investigation. The elucidation of this unexpected correlation not only underscores the playful side of scientific exploration but also underscores the importance of considering unorthodox variables in statistical analysis, navigating the terrain of research with a blend of scholarly rigor and statistical whimsy.

In conclusion, the discovery of the correlation between air pollution levels in Washington Court House, Ohio, and Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count serves as a whimsical reminder of the delightful and offbeat trajectories that statistics and research can traverse. The unexpected convergence of environmental factors and sporting feats invites us to embrace the impish and unanticipated dimensions of statistical inquiry, infusing the scholarly landscape with a dash of levity and an exuberant appreciation for the quirky interplay of variables in scientific investigation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Washington Court House, Ohio and Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Air Pollution and Podolski's Prolificity: A Goal-scoring Correlation"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the unexpected and whimsical connection between air pollution levels in Washington Court House, Ohio, and the domestic match goal count of the renowned footballer, Lukas Podolski. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, an intriguing correlation coefficient of 0.9109714 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 were discovered for the period spanning from 2004 to 2012. Our findings highlight a surprising relationship between environmental factors and athletic achievements, providing an amusing and thought-provoking insight into the potential influence of air quality on sports performance. This research not only presents a statistically sound analysis but also offers a lighthearted juxtaposition of seemingly unrelated phenomena, encouraging further exploration into the quirky intersections of environmental conditions and sporting prowess.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the realm of statistical analysis and academic inquiry, it is often the case that unexpected correlations emerge, prompting researchers to pause and consider the whimsical dance of variables. In this paper, we delve into the peculiar and seemingly improbable relationship between air pollution levels in Washington Court House, Ohio, and the domestic match goal count of none other than the illustrious Lukas Podolski. While the initial premise may elicit a chuckle or a quizzical eyebrow raise, it is precisely these offbeat connections that spark curiosity and drive scientific inquiry.
The endeavor of investigating such an association necessitates a careful and rigorous approach, rooted in the principles of statistical analysis and environmental research. As we embark on this peculiar journey, it is paramount to appreciate the multifaceted nature of our investigation. On one hand, we grapple with the tangible and quantifiable metrics of air pollution levels, drawing upon data gleaned from the esteemed Environmental Protection Agency. On the other hand, we delve into the intangible realm of athletic achievement, seeking to measure the goal-scoring prowess of a celebrated footballer notorious for his thunderous strikes and unyielding determination on the pitch.
The confluence of these divergent variables beckons us to consider the interplay of environmental factors and athletic performance, beckoning us to unlock the subtle mysteries that might be hiding in plain sight. While statistical rigor and methodological precision undoubtedly underpin our efforts, we invite the reader to embrace the delightful irony and levity inherent in this pursuit. After all, who would have conceived that the quality of the air in a small Ohio town might hold sway over the goal-scoring exploits of a revered footballing figure?
As we navigate this intricate and unexpected terrain, let us approach the task at hand with due diligence and scholarly rigor – and perhaps a dash of lighthearted mirth. For in the whimsical juxtaposition of air pollution and athletic prowess, we may yet uncover a tapestry of statistical intrigue and amusing anecdotes, showcasing the peculiar and often serendipitous nature of scientific investigation.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia revealed a captivating and remarkably robust correlation between air pollution levels in Washington Court House, Ohio, and Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count for the period from 2004 to 2012. The correlation coefficient of 0.9109714 suggests a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This conspicuous correlation, which exhibited an r-squared value of 0.8298688, surpassed the conventional threshold for statistical significance with a p-value of less than 0.01.
Fig. 1 illustrates the compelling relationship between air pollution levels and Lukas Podolski's goal-scoring exploits, showcasing a visually striking scatterplot that attests to the robustness of the correlation. One cannot help but marvel at the alignment of data points, harmonizing in a symphony of statistical significance and whimsical intrigue.
The findings from this investigation not only affirm the unexpected and whimsical link between environmental conditions and athletic achievements but also underscore the potential for nuanced interplay between seemingly unrelated phenomena. While the statistical robustness of the correlation demands acknowledgment and respect, the fortuitous nature of this discovery elicits a sense of mirth and wonder, challenging established notions and beckoning researchers to explore the more peculiar dimensions of statistical analysis and environmental influence on athletic performance.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

As we conclude this curious investigation into the intertwined realms of air pollution and Lukas Podolski's goal-scoring prowess, we are reminded of the capricious nature of statistical inquiry. Our study has illuminated a remarkably robust correlation between the air quality in Washington Court House, Ohio, and the domestic match goal count of the illustrious footballer. While the statistical significance of this correlation demands meticulous interpretation, one cannot help but marvel at the whimsical dance of variables, transcending the confines of traditional scientific exploration.

The alignment of data points, akin to celestial bodies harmonizing in their cosmic ballet, serves as a testament to the singular wonder of statistical analysis and the unexpected twists inherent in scientific investigation. It is not every day that one uncovers a correlation as resolute and, dare we say, charismatic as the one observed in this study. The convergence of environmental metrics and sporting achievements has yielded a tapestry of statistical intrigue, replete with moments of levity and paradoxical revelations.

As we bid adieu to this zany foray into the enigmatic realms of air pollution and athletic exploits, we are compelled to acknowledge the sheer unexpectedness of our findings. While our study has shed light on a correlation that surpasses conventional expectations, we must also pause to appreciate the fortuitous nature of this discovery. For in the midst of statistical rigor and methodological precision, there exists a playful undercurrent of whimsy, beckoning researchers to embrace the quirky and the unanticipated.

In light of these remarkable findings, we are inclined to assert that further research in this domain may yield diminishing returns, akin to chasing a football that has already rippled the back of the net. Our study has unveiled a correlation that teeters on the line between statistical intrigue and delightful peculiarity, compelling us to venture forth into new avenues of scholarly inquiry. It is our hope that this whimsical synthesis of air pollution and athletic prowess serves as a testament to the serendipitous nature of scientific exploration, inspiring researchers to seek out the unexpected and revel in the peculiar delights that lie at the fringes of statistical inquiry.

In conclusion, dear reader, as we bid adieu to this peculiar sojourn, we are reminded that the quirks and jests of statistical analysis never fail to surprise and amuse, unveiling the unexpected connections that lie just beneath the surface. And with that, we declare that no more research is needed in this area.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Air Pollution and Podolski's Prolificity: A Goal-scoring Correlation. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Environmental Soccer Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Air Pollution and Podolski's Prolificity: A Goal-scoring Correlation. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Atmospheric Analysis and Athletic Achievement


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Air Pollution and Podolski's Prolificity: A Goal-scoring Correlation with an abstract of This study investigates the unexpected and whimsical connection between air pollution levels in Washington Court House, Ohio, and the domestic match goal count of the renowned footballer, Lukas Podolski. Utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Wikipedia, an intriguing correlation coefficient of 0.9109714 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 were discovered for the period spanning from 2004 to 2012. Our findings highlight a surprising relationship between environmental factors and athletic achievements, providing an amusing and thought-provoking insight into the potential influence of air quality on sports performance. This research not only presents a statistically sound analysis but also offers a lighthearted juxtaposition of seemingly unrelated phenomena, encouraging further exploration into the quirky intersections of environmental conditions and sporting prowess.

ChatGPT:

Air pollution, Podolski, prolificity, goal-scoring correlation, air pollution levels, Washington Court House, Ohio, Lukas Podolski, footballer, correlation coefficient, statistically significant, environmental factors, athletic achievements, air quality, sports performance, environmental conditions, sporting prowess, environmental influence on sports performance

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Washington Court House, Ohio
Detailed data title: Percentage of days 'unhealthy' or worse air quality in Washington Court House, OH
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Washington Court House, Ohio

Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count

Correlation r = 0.9109714 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8298688 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 83% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Washington Court House, Ohio) over the 9 years from 2004 through 2012.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00063. 0.0006348757101131594000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 0.063% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,575 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 8 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 8 because we have two variables measured over a period of 9 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.62, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200420052006200720082009201020112012
Air pollution in Washington Court House, Ohio (Bad air quality days)00.005665720000000.00285714
Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count (Goals scored)102912710931418




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0,0.00566572,0,0,0,0,0,0,0.00285714,])
array_2 = np.array([10,29,12,7,10,9,3,14,18,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Washington Court House, Ohio"
array_2_name = "Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm grateful for your review!


Correlation ID: 2538 · Black Variable ID: 22274 · Red Variable ID: 334
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0