Report an error
Burglaries in Washington correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Associates degrees awarded in Criminal justice and corrections | r=0.98 | 11yrs | No |
Milk consumption | r=0.96 | 32yrs | Yes! |
Kerosene used in Mexico | r=0.94 | 35yrs | Yes! |
The number of telemarketers in Washington | r=0.92 | 20yrs | No |
The divorce rate in Washington | r=0.92 | 23yrs | No |
Cottage cheese consumption | r=0.9 | 32yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Pierre | r=0.87 | 38yrs | No |
Air pollution in Spokane, Washington | r=0.79 | 38yrs | No |
The number of aerospace engineers in Washington | r=0.76 | 13yrs | No |
Burglaries in Washington also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)