Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
Report an error
Google searches for 'sushi near me' correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Air pollution in St. Marys, Pennsylvania | r=1 | 9yrs | Yes! |
Solar power generated in United States | r=0.99 | 18yrs | No |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in information sciences | r=0.99 | 10yrs | No |
Master's degrees awarded in Mathematics and statistics | r=0.99 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Master's degrees awarded in Multi/interdisciplinary studies | r=0.99 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Solar power generated in Morocco | r=0.98 | 18yrs | Yes! |
Wind power generated in South Africa | r=0.98 | 18yrs | Yes! |
Master's degrees awarded in Parks & Recreation | r=0.98 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Associates degrees awarded in Psychology | r=0.98 | 11yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Ghana | r=0.97 | 9yrs | No |
Fossil fuel use in Burundi | r=0.97 | 18yrs | No |
Solar power generated in Nicaragua | r=0.96 | 18yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Malcolm | r=0.95 | 19yrs | No |
The number of librarians in Georgia | r=-0.94 | 15yrs | No |
Google searches for 'sushi near me' also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)