Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
Report an error
Google searches for 'lost my wallet' correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Fossil fuel use in Lebanon | r=0.97 | 15yrs | No |
Electricity generation in Lebanon | r=0.97 | 15yrs | No |
Number of internet users | r=0.96 | 10yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Weston | r=0.96 | 16yrs | No |
Gasoline pumped in Chile | r=0.96 | 16yrs | No |
GMO use in corn grown in Texas | r=0.95 | 17yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'red pill blue pill' meme | r=0.94 | 17yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Emmett | r=0.94 | 16yrs | No |
Revenue of US Broadcasting Industry | r=0.92 | 15yrs | No |
Global revenue generated by Unilever Group | r=0.92 | 16yrs | Yes! |
US GDP per capita | r=0.92 | 14yrs | No |
Dollar Tree's stock price (DLTR) | r=0.92 | 17yrs | No |
Apple's annual net income | r=0.92 | 16yrs | No |
How insightful SmarterEveryDay YouTube video titles are | r=0.91 | 17yrs | No |
The number of zoologists in New Mexico | r=0.67 | 16yrs | Yes! |
The number of films in Sylvester Stallone's filmography | r=0.56 | 16yrs | No |
Google searches for 'lost my wallet' also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)