about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,269 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of zoologists in New Mexico and the second variable is Google searches for 'lost my wallet'.  The chart goes from 2007 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of zoologists in New Mexico soared, there was a strange otter migration towards wallets. The sea of wallets proved too tempting for these crafty creatures, leading to a wave of missing wallets across the state. It seems the otterly charming zoologists unintentionally sparked a statewide game of hide-and-seek with our wallets. It's a situation that can only be described as a 'otter'ly bizarre case of wallet disappearance!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that embodies the cyberpunk style. Show an office in Albuquerque, with the sun streaming in through the window as a zoologist sits at their computer, immersed in their research on wildlife. On the desk, the computer screen displays a Google search for "lost my wallet." Just outside the window, a group of colleagues engaged in lively discussion against the backdrop of the captivating New Mexico landscape. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of zoologists in New Mexico and Google searches for 'lost my wallet'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cyberpunk Cutsy art illustration Voxel art Low poly Photorealism
ChatGPT: Cyberpunk

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of zoologists in New Mexico and Google searches for 'lost my wallet' together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a sunny office in Albuquerque, a zoologist is answering emails and researching wildlife on their computer. On the desk, there is an open browser with a Google search for "lost my wallet" on the screen. Just outside the window, a few colleagues are discussing their latest field work in the beautiful New Mexico landscape.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cyberpunk ] and depicting this scene: In a sunny office in Albuquerque, a zoologist is answering emails and researching wildlife on their computer. On the desk, there is an open browser with a Google search for "lost my wallet" on the screen. Just outside the window, a few colleagues are discussing their latest field work in the beautiful New Mexico landscape. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that embodies the cyberpunk style. Show an office in Albuquerque, with the sun streaming in through the window as a zoologist sits at their computer, immersed in their research on wildlife. On the desk, the computer screen displays a Google search for "lost my wallet." Just outside the window, a group of colleagues engaged in lively discussion against the backdrop of the captivating New Mexico landscape.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of zoologists in New Mexico caused lost my wallet (Google searches for 'lost my wallet') to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Zoologist-Zoinks Connection: Uncovering the Wallet-Wildlife Correlation in New Mexico

The Journal of Ecological Quirks and Curiosities

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of zoologists in New Mexico and Google searches for 'lost my wallet'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.6716816 and p < 0.01 for 2007 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Zoologist-Zoinks Connection: Uncovering the Wallet-Wildlife Correlation in New Mexico

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the peculiar relationship between the number of zoologists in New Mexico and Google searches for "lost my wallet". Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team embarked on a mission to unravel this enigmatic connection. The findings unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.6716816 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 2007 to 2022, shedding light on this uncanny correlation.

It appears that as the population of zoologists in New Mexico increases, so does the frequency of Google searches related to misplaced wallets. This unexpected relationship offers a new angle for understanding human behavior in response to wildlife sightings. One can’t help but ponder if the wallets are not just lost, but have embarked on a wild adventure of their own, perhaps attempting to join a local herd of roaming bison.

With these findings in mind, we encourage the integration of wallet-tracking devices into the toolkit of every diligent zoologist, ensuring that wildlife enthusiasts are not unwittingly aiding in the distribution of potential wallet-related chaos. After all, we wouldn't want wallets to become the latest endangered species, now would we?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of zoologists in New Mexico and Google searches for 'lost my wallet'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Zoologist-Zoinks Connection: Uncovering the Wallet-Wildlife Correlation in New Mexico

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the peculiar relationship between the number of zoologists in New Mexico and Google searches for "lost my wallet". Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team embarked on a mission to unravel this enigmatic connection. The findings unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.6716816 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 2007 to 2022, shedding light on this uncanny correlation.

It appears that as the population of zoologists in New Mexico increases, so does the frequency of Google searches related to misplaced wallets. This unexpected relationship offers a new angle for understanding human behavior in response to wildlife sightings. One can’t help but ponder if the wallets are not just lost, but have embarked on a wild adventure of their own, perhaps attempting to join a local herd of roaming bison.

With these findings in mind, we encourage the integration of wallet-tracking devices into the toolkit of every diligent zoologist, ensuring that wildlife enthusiasts are not unwittingly aiding in the distribution of potential wallet-related chaos. After all, we wouldn't want wallets to become the latest endangered species, now would we?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As the late, great Charles Darwin once said, "It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change." And in the ever-evolving landscape of scientific inquiry, it seems that even the most unpredictable of correlations can reveal insightful connections. This leads us to the peculiar relationship between the number of zoologists in New Mexico and the frequency of Google searches for "lost my wallet", prompting us to wonder if wallets have become the new elusive species in the wild.

Now, before we delve into the nitty-gritty statistical analysis, let's address the elephant in the room – or should we say, the bison? Yes, that’s right – while studying the strange link between zoologists and missing wallets, we felt the need to acknowledge the potential “herd mentality” of these wayward wallets, perhaps seeking to blend in among the local wildlife. It's as if their natural camouflage is a wallet-sized bison costume hiding in plain sight!

Our journey into this unique correlation began with a pang of curiosity and a dash of skepticism, much like the start of a wild safari. Yet, armed with data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team ventured forth, equipped with a compass for navigating through the jungle of statistical significance and a pair of binoculars for keeping a keen eye on the surprising correlations. It's fair to say we were truly "wallet-armed" for our expedition!

As we scrutinized the data, what we uncovered was a correlation coefficient of 0.6716816 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 2007 to 2022, a result that left us as astonished as a chameleon finding itself in a box of crayons. The findings not only raised eyebrows but also raised the question of whether wallets, much like certain species, exhibit migratory patterns influenced by zoological activity in their vicinity. It's almost as if wallets have taken on the behavior of elusive creatures, a phenomenon we might dub as "pocket-sized rangers on the move"!

Through the lens of our research, it becomes clear that the bond between zoologists and misplaced wallets is more than mere coincidence; it offers a fascinating perspective on the interplay between human behavior and encounters with wildlife. As we reflect on these unexpected findings, one can't help but appreciate the inexplicable ways in which the world of science continuously astonishes and amuses us. After all, who would have thought that a study on zoologists and wallets could lead to such walletful revelations?

With these discoveries in hand, we invite you on a whimsical expedition into the enigmatic realm of zoologists, missing wallets, and the wild wonders that unfold when seemingly disparate variables collide. So, grab your wallet (and try not to lose it) as we embark on this scientific safari through the untamed wilderness of unexpected correlations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of zoologists in New Mexico and Google searches for 'lost my wallet'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Zoologist-Zoinks Connection: Uncovering the Wallet-Wildlife Correlation in New Mexico

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the peculiar relationship between the number of zoologists in New Mexico and Google searches for "lost my wallet". Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team embarked on a mission to unravel this enigmatic connection. The findings unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.6716816 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 2007 to 2022, shedding light on this uncanny correlation.

It appears that as the population of zoologists in New Mexico increases, so does the frequency of Google searches related to misplaced wallets. This unexpected relationship offers a new angle for understanding human behavior in response to wildlife sightings. One can’t help but ponder if the wallets are not just lost, but have embarked on a wild adventure of their own, perhaps attempting to join a local herd of roaming bison.

With these findings in mind, we encourage the integration of wallet-tracking devices into the toolkit of every diligent zoologist, ensuring that wildlife enthusiasts are not unwittingly aiding in the distribution of potential wallet-related chaos. After all, we wouldn't want wallets to become the latest endangered species, now would we?

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the late, great Charles Darwin once said, "It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change." And in the ever-evolving landscape of scientific inquiry, it seems that even the most unpredictable of correlations can reveal insightful connections. This leads us to the peculiar relationship between the number of zoologists in New Mexico and the frequency of Google searches for "lost my wallet", prompting us to wonder if wallets have become the new elusive species in the wild.
Now, before we delve into the nitty-gritty statistical analysis, let's address the elephant in the room – or should we say, the bison? Yes, that’s right – while studying the strange link between zoologists and missing wallets, we felt the need to acknowledge the potential “herd mentality” of these wayward wallets, perhaps seeking to blend in among the local wildlife. It's as if their natural camouflage is a wallet-sized bison costume hiding in plain sight!
Our journey into this unique correlation began with a pang of curiosity and a dash of skepticism, much like the start of a wild safari. Yet, armed with data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team ventured forth, equipped with a compass for navigating through the jungle of statistical significance and a pair of binoculars for keeping a keen eye on the surprising correlations. It's fair to say we were truly "wallet-armed" for our expedition!
As we scrutinized the data, what we uncovered was a correlation coefficient of 0.6716816 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 2007 to 2022, a result that left us as astonished as a chameleon finding itself in a box of crayons. The findings not only raised eyebrows but also raised the question of whether wallets, much like certain species, exhibit migratory patterns influenced by zoological activity in their vicinity. It's almost as if wallets have taken on the behavior of elusive creatures, a phenomenon we might dub as "pocket-sized rangers on the move"!
Through the lens of our research, it becomes clear that the bond between zoologists and misplaced wallets is more than mere coincidence; it offers a fascinating perspective on the interplay between human behavior and encounters with wildlife. As we reflect on these unexpected findings, one can't help but appreciate the inexplicable ways in which the world of science continuously astonishes and amuses us. After all, who would have thought that a study on zoologists and wallets could lead to such walletful revelations?
With these discoveries in hand, we invite you on a whimsical expedition into the enigmatic realm of zoologists, missing wallets, and the wild wonders that unfold when seemingly disparate variables collide. So, grab your wallet (and try not to lose it) as we embark on this scientific safari through the untamed wilderness of unexpected correlations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between zoologists and Google searches for "lost my wallet" has been a subject of profound curiosity, prompting researchers to explore this unconventional juxtaposition of wildlife expertise and personal item misplacement. Smith and Doe (2015) articulated the significance of human-wildlife interactions and identified the potential for unexpected correlations to emerge within these encounters. However, little did they anticipate the comical twist that wallets would add to the narrative, holding a metaphorical mirror to the antics of the elusive creatures studied by zoologists.

In a similar vein, Jones (2018) delved into the behavioral patterns exhibited by wild animals in response to human presence, emphasizing the interconnectedness between human activities and wildlife dynamics. Little did Jones know, the real wildlife to be observed may have been the wallets embarking on their grand escapade within the realm of New Mexico's zoological landscapes.

In keeping with the zoological theme, "Zoology: The Secret Lives of Animals" by Mary Jones offers a comprehensive exploration of diverse animal species and their captivating behaviors. Perhaps in the next edition, a chapter on "The Secret Lives of Wallets" will make its debut – a humorous yet intriguing addition to the field.

Additionally, "The Call of the Wild" by Jack London and "Where the Wild Things Are" by Maurice Sendak provide fictional yet insightful narratives of untamed environments and the enigmatic allure of the wild. Could it be that within these narratives, the plight of wallets searching for belonging amidst the New Mexican wilderness is an allegory waiting to be uncovered?

A recent social media post by @WildWalletWatchers highlighted an anecdote of a zoologist stumbling upon a misplaced wallet while observing a pack of coyotes. The post humorously pondered whether the wallet mistook the canines for distant relatives and decided to join in on their escapades – a speculation that undeniably adds a touch of whimsy to the realm of zoological exploration.

Isn't it wild, the unexpected connections that can be drawn between seemingly unrelated elements? It seems that even in the vast expanse of academic research, a touch of humor and a nod to the absurdity of life can elevate the discourse to new heights – or should we say, new wallets?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of zoologists in New Mexico and Google searches for 'lost my wallet'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends . You used data from 2007 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Zoologist-Zoinks Connection: Uncovering the Wallet-Wildlife Correlation in New Mexico

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the peculiar relationship between the number of zoologists in New Mexico and Google searches for "lost my wallet". Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team embarked on a mission to unravel this enigmatic connection. The findings unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.6716816 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 2007 to 2022, shedding light on this uncanny correlation.

It appears that as the population of zoologists in New Mexico increases, so does the frequency of Google searches related to misplaced wallets. This unexpected relationship offers a new angle for understanding human behavior in response to wildlife sightings. One can’t help but ponder if the wallets are not just lost, but have embarked on a wild adventure of their own, perhaps attempting to join a local herd of roaming bison.

With these findings in mind, we encourage the integration of wallet-tracking devices into the toolkit of every diligent zoologist, ensuring that wildlife enthusiasts are not unwittingly aiding in the distribution of potential wallet-related chaos. After all, we wouldn't want wallets to become the latest endangered species, now would we?

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the late, great Charles Darwin once said, "It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change." And in the ever-evolving landscape of scientific inquiry, it seems that even the most unpredictable of correlations can reveal insightful connections. This leads us to the peculiar relationship between the number of zoologists in New Mexico and the frequency of Google searches for "lost my wallet", prompting us to wonder if wallets have become the new elusive species in the wild.
Now, before we delve into the nitty-gritty statistical analysis, let's address the elephant in the room – or should we say, the bison? Yes, that’s right – while studying the strange link between zoologists and missing wallets, we felt the need to acknowledge the potential “herd mentality” of these wayward wallets, perhaps seeking to blend in among the local wildlife. It's as if their natural camouflage is a wallet-sized bison costume hiding in plain sight!
Our journey into this unique correlation began with a pang of curiosity and a dash of skepticism, much like the start of a wild safari. Yet, armed with data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team ventured forth, equipped with a compass for navigating through the jungle of statistical significance and a pair of binoculars for keeping a keen eye on the surprising correlations. It's fair to say we were truly "wallet-armed" for our expedition!
As we scrutinized the data, what we uncovered was a correlation coefficient of 0.6716816 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 2007 to 2022, a result that left us as astonished as a chameleon finding itself in a box of crayons. The findings not only raised eyebrows but also raised the question of whether wallets, much like certain species, exhibit migratory patterns influenced by zoological activity in their vicinity. It's almost as if wallets have taken on the behavior of elusive creatures, a phenomenon we might dub as "pocket-sized rangers on the move"!
Through the lens of our research, it becomes clear that the bond between zoologists and misplaced wallets is more than mere coincidence; it offers a fascinating perspective on the interplay between human behavior and encounters with wildlife. As we reflect on these unexpected findings, one can't help but appreciate the inexplicable ways in which the world of science continuously astonishes and amuses us. After all, who would have thought that a study on zoologists and wallets could lead to such walletful revelations?
With these discoveries in hand, we invite you on a whimsical expedition into the enigmatic realm of zoologists, missing wallets, and the wild wonders that unfold when seemingly disparate variables collide. So, grab your wallet (and try not to lose it) as we embark on this scientific safari through the untamed wilderness of unexpected correlations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

The methodology for our study can be likened to a wild safari through the tangled jungle of data collection and statistical analysis. Much like navigating through the untamed wilderness, our research team embarked on a curious expedition to uncover the hidden trails and elusive connections between the number of zoologists in New Mexico and the frequency of Google searches for "lost my wallet".

To begin our escapade, the first step was to hunt down the elusive data sources that would illuminate this wallet-wildlife correlation. We pored over the habitat of the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, setting our traps for the data from 2007 to 2022, a period chosen to capture the migratory patterns of both zoologists and wallets. This data, much like a well-crafted habitat, would provide the bedrock for our scientific safari. Speaking of habitats, did you hear about the scientific study on the homes of birds? It's quite a nest-egg of information!

Having secured our data amidst the digital undergrowth, we then tamed the unruly statistical methodologies to wrangle meaningful insights from the tangled web of information. We performed a rigorous correlation analysis, akin to untangling the knotted mane of a statistical lion, to reveal the coefficient of 0.6716816 and a p-value of less than 0.01. These statistical beasts are not to be taken lightly, for they can roar insights as definitive as a lion’s pride staking its claim in the savanna of significance.

With the statistical topography charted, we then conducted a time-series analysis to track the ebb and flow of both zoologists and lost wallets over the years. This temporal exploration allowed us to observe the seasonal migrations of misplaced wallets, potentially uncovering their hidden patterns of movement in response to the burgeoning population of zoologists. It’s as if the wallets, much like migrating wildebeest, were utilizing zoologists as their newfound guides through the wilderness of New Mexico – a phenomenon we might categorize under “zoological assistance in wallet wanderlust”.

In parallel to our statistical treks, we also explored the qualitative side of behavioral science, delving into the psychology behind misplaced wallets and the enigmatic allure of wildlife encounters. Through anecdotal interviews with zoologists and wallet-owners alike, we attempted to capture the impassioned narratives of these two disparate groups, as they wove their tales of wallets embarked on stealthy adventures in the company of awe-struck zoologists. It’s almost as if the wallets were seeking out these professional wildlife enthusiasts, perhaps hoping for an audience to appreciate their nature-themed designs!

In the grand tapestry of our methodology, this multi-pronged approach enabled us to shed light on the peculiar correlation between zoologists and lost wallets, enriching the scientific landscape with unexpected insights that could rival even the grandeur of a vast, wild safari. With the study's framework firmly in place, we set out to navigate the uncharted territory of correlation, encouraging our findings to take root amidst the scientific savannas of curiosity and astonishment. For in the wilderness of research, every unexpected correlation is ripe for exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of zoologists in New Mexico and Google searches for 'lost my wallet'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends .

For the time period 2007 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.6716816, r-squared of 0.4511561, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Zoologist-Zoinks Connection: Uncovering the Wallet-Wildlife Correlation in New Mexico

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the peculiar relationship between the number of zoologists in New Mexico and Google searches for "lost my wallet". Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team embarked on a mission to unravel this enigmatic connection. The findings unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.6716816 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 2007 to 2022, shedding light on this uncanny correlation.

It appears that as the population of zoologists in New Mexico increases, so does the frequency of Google searches related to misplaced wallets. This unexpected relationship offers a new angle for understanding human behavior in response to wildlife sightings. One can’t help but ponder if the wallets are not just lost, but have embarked on a wild adventure of their own, perhaps attempting to join a local herd of roaming bison.

With these findings in mind, we encourage the integration of wallet-tracking devices into the toolkit of every diligent zoologist, ensuring that wildlife enthusiasts are not unwittingly aiding in the distribution of potential wallet-related chaos. After all, we wouldn't want wallets to become the latest endangered species, now would we?

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As the late, great Charles Darwin once said, "It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change." And in the ever-evolving landscape of scientific inquiry, it seems that even the most unpredictable of correlations can reveal insightful connections. This leads us to the peculiar relationship between the number of zoologists in New Mexico and the frequency of Google searches for "lost my wallet", prompting us to wonder if wallets have become the new elusive species in the wild.
Now, before we delve into the nitty-gritty statistical analysis, let's address the elephant in the room – or should we say, the bison? Yes, that’s right – while studying the strange link between zoologists and missing wallets, we felt the need to acknowledge the potential “herd mentality” of these wayward wallets, perhaps seeking to blend in among the local wildlife. It's as if their natural camouflage is a wallet-sized bison costume hiding in plain sight!
Our journey into this unique correlation began with a pang of curiosity and a dash of skepticism, much like the start of a wild safari. Yet, armed with data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team ventured forth, equipped with a compass for navigating through the jungle of statistical significance and a pair of binoculars for keeping a keen eye on the surprising correlations. It's fair to say we were truly "wallet-armed" for our expedition!
As we scrutinized the data, what we uncovered was a correlation coefficient of 0.6716816 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 2007 to 2022, a result that left us as astonished as a chameleon finding itself in a box of crayons. The findings not only raised eyebrows but also raised the question of whether wallets, much like certain species, exhibit migratory patterns influenced by zoological activity in their vicinity. It's almost as if wallets have taken on the behavior of elusive creatures, a phenomenon we might dub as "pocket-sized rangers on the move"!
Through the lens of our research, it becomes clear that the bond between zoologists and misplaced wallets is more than mere coincidence; it offers a fascinating perspective on the interplay between human behavior and encounters with wildlife. As we reflect on these unexpected findings, one can't help but appreciate the inexplicable ways in which the world of science continuously astonishes and amuses us. After all, who would have thought that a study on zoologists and wallets could lead to such walletful revelations?
With these discoveries in hand, we invite you on a whimsical expedition into the enigmatic realm of zoologists, missing wallets, and the wild wonders that unfold when seemingly disparate variables collide. So, grab your wallet (and try not to lose it) as we embark on this scientific safari through the untamed wilderness of unexpected correlations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the relationship between the number of zoologists in New Mexico and Google searches for "lost my wallet" yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.6716816, indicating a moderately strong positive correlation. We were, quite frankly, as surprised as a deer in headlights at this unexpected finding.

In addition, the r-squared value of 0.4511561 suggests that approximately 45.12% of the variance in wallet-related searches can be explained by the variance in the number of zoologists. It's clear that something truly wild is afoot here – enough to make even the most level-headed statistician furrow their brows in wonder.

The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the significance of the observed relationship, providing compelling evidence that this correlation is not merely a fluke. It seems that the allure of the animal kingdom is not limited to wildlife enthusiasts alone but extends its reach to the realm of missing personal effects, as well. It's almost as if the wallets are trying to tell us, “I’ll be beary happy if you come find me!”

We present a visual depiction of this compelling correlation in Fig. 1, which illustrates a scatterplot showcasing the positive relationship between the two variables. It's quite the sight to behold – a veritable snapshot of zoologists and wallets dancing in statistical harmony, like an elegant waltz in the wild.

This unexpected discovery not only challenges traditional notions of wildlife-human interaction but also offers a playful reminder that science is full of surprises. Just when you think you’ve seen it all, a correlation like this comes along and leaves you scratching your head, much like a curious raccoon pondering the mysteries of the universe.

Upon pondering this unique association, one can’t help but wonder if perhaps the wallets, much like a flock of birds, have sensed a newfound kinship with the zoological community. Perhaps they have adopted the mantra “bird of a feather, herd together” in their own quirky way. It's as if they are urging us to remember that statistical relationships, much like the animal kingdom, can often be filled with unexpected twists and turns.

In conclusion, our findings not only reveal a noteworthy correlation between the number of zoologists in New Mexico and Google searches for "lost my wallet" but also invite us to embrace the unpredictable and whimsical nature of scientific inquiry. After all, who said that statistics couldn’t be as entertaining as a barrel of monkeys?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of zoologists in New Mexico and Google searches for 'lost my wallet'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Zoologist-Zoinks Connection: Uncovering the Wallet-Wildlife Correlation in New Mexico

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the peculiar relationship between the number of zoologists in New Mexico and Google searches for "lost my wallet". Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team embarked on a mission to unravel this enigmatic connection. The findings unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.6716816 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 2007 to 2022, shedding light on this uncanny correlation.

It appears that as the population of zoologists in New Mexico increases, so does the frequency of Google searches related to misplaced wallets. This unexpected relationship offers a new angle for understanding human behavior in response to wildlife sightings. One can’t help but ponder if the wallets are not just lost, but have embarked on a wild adventure of their own, perhaps attempting to join a local herd of roaming bison.

With these findings in mind, we encourage the integration of wallet-tracking devices into the toolkit of every diligent zoologist, ensuring that wildlife enthusiasts are not unwittingly aiding in the distribution of potential wallet-related chaos. After all, we wouldn't want wallets to become the latest endangered species, now would we?

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between zoologists and Google searches for "lost my wallet" has been a subject of profound curiosity, prompting researchers to explore this unconventional juxtaposition of wildlife expertise and personal item misplacement. Smith and Doe (2015) articulated the significance of human-wildlife interactions and identified the potential for unexpected correlations to emerge within these encounters. However, little did they anticipate the comical twist that wallets would add to the narrative, holding a metaphorical mirror to the antics of the elusive creatures studied by zoologists.
In a similar vein, Jones (2018) delved into the behavioral patterns exhibited by wild animals in response to human presence, emphasizing the interconnectedness between human activities and wildlife dynamics. Little did Jones know, the real wildlife to be observed may have been the wallets embarking on their grand escapade within the realm of New Mexico's zoological landscapes.
In keeping with the zoological theme, "Zoology: The Secret Lives of Animals" by Mary Jones offers a comprehensive exploration of diverse animal species and their captivating behaviors. Perhaps in the next edition, a chapter on "The Secret Lives of Wallets" will make its debut – a humorous yet intriguing addition to the field.
Additionally, "The Call of the Wild" by Jack London and "Where the Wild Things Are" by Maurice Sendak provide fictional yet insightful narratives of untamed environments and the enigmatic allure of the wild. Could it be that within these narratives, the plight of wallets searching for belonging amidst the New Mexican wilderness is an allegory waiting to be uncovered?
A recent social media post by @WildWalletWatchers highlighted an anecdote of a zoologist stumbling upon a misplaced wallet while observing a pack of coyotes. The post humorously pondered whether the wallet mistook the canines for distant relatives and decided to join in on their escapades – a speculation that undeniably adds a touch of whimsy to the realm of zoological exploration.
Isn't it wild, the unexpected connections that can be drawn between seemingly unrelated elements? It seems that even in the vast expanse of academic research, a touch of humor and a nod to the absurdity of life can elevate the discourse to new heights – or should we say, new wallets?

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between the number of zoologists in New Mexico and Google searches for "lost my wallet" yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.6716816, indicating a moderately strong positive correlation. We were, quite frankly, as surprised as a deer in headlights at this unexpected finding.
In addition, the r-squared value of 0.4511561 suggests that approximately 45.12% of the variance in wallet-related searches can be explained by the variance in the number of zoologists. It's clear that something truly wild is afoot here – enough to make even the most level-headed statistician furrow their brows in wonder.
The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the significance of the observed relationship, providing compelling evidence that this correlation is not merely a fluke. It seems that the allure of the animal kingdom is not limited to wildlife enthusiasts alone but extends its reach to the realm of missing personal effects, as well. It's almost as if the wallets are trying to tell us, “I’ll be beary happy if you come find me!”
We present a visual depiction of this compelling correlation in Fig. 1, which illustrates a scatterplot showcasing the positive relationship between the two variables. It's quite the sight to behold – a veritable snapshot of zoologists and wallets dancing in statistical harmony, like an elegant waltz in the wild.
This unexpected discovery not only challenges traditional notions of wildlife-human interaction but also offers a playful reminder that science is full of surprises. Just when you think you’ve seen it all, a correlation like this comes along and leaves you scratching your head, much like a curious raccoon pondering the mysteries of the universe.
Upon pondering this unique association, one can’t help but wonder if perhaps the wallets, much like a flock of birds, have sensed a newfound kinship with the zoological community. Perhaps they have adopted the mantra “bird of a feather, herd together” in their own quirky way. It's as if they are urging us to remember that statistical relationships, much like the animal kingdom, can often be filled with unexpected twists and turns.
In conclusion, our findings not only reveal a noteworthy correlation between the number of zoologists in New Mexico and Google searches for "lost my wallet" but also invite us to embrace the unpredictable and whimsical nature of scientific inquiry. After all, who said that statistics couldn’t be as entertaining as a barrel of monkeys?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study not only showcase the unexpected correlation between the number of zoologists in New Mexico and Google searches for "lost my wallet," but also demonstrate the whimsical and unpredictable nature of scientific inquiry. In the realm of statistical relationships, it seems that the zoological community and wayward wallets have forged an unlikely connection – akin to a monkey forming an allegorical bond with an algorithm.

Building on the literature review, this research has indeed augmented the understanding of wildlife-human dynamics, offering a fresh perspective on the interplay between the elusive wallets and the passionate pursuit of zoological inquiry. It is as if the wallets are signaling to us, "You may have lost your wallet, but we have found a way to your heart – through statistics and wild observations!"

The positive correlation coefficient reiterates the compelling association between these seemingly disparate variables, as if the wallets and zoologists are engaged in a statistical tango – a waltz of wild numbers that has left us all gazing in awe, much like a flock of bewildered flamingos at the intricacies of their mesmerizing dance.

The robust relationship unravelled through our analysis adds an amusing twist to the often serious realm of research. As the wallets continue to skitter about in the statistical underbrush, it seems they are playfully teasing us with their knack for mischief, whispering, "I'm not just another lost wallet; I'm a wandering enigma of statistical intrigue!"

In light of our findings, it becomes evident that the traditional boundaries of scientific inquiry must make space for the unexpected and the fantastical. The wallets seemingly implore us to approach statistics with a spirit of lighthearted curiosity, much like a curious otter playfully dabbling in the waters of numerical mysteries.

The r-squared value, along with the significant p-value, cements the validity of this correlation, leaving us all pondering the enigma of the wallets and their coalescence with the zoological community. It's almost as if the wallets are issuing a challenge – "Can you unravel the mystery hidden within the folds of our leather interior?"

Our research not only encourages a reimagining of statistical relationships but also urges scholars to embrace the quirkiness and unpredictability of scientific exploration. After all, one never knows when a correlation as unexpected as this might come bounding out of the statistical jungle, much like a playful troup of leaping lemurs.

It is our hope that this paper will inspire future researchers to approach their inquiries with a touch of levity, ready to uncover the unexpected and the absurdity that often lurks beneath the surface of scientific exploration. Who knows? Perhaps the wallets are but the first of many seemingly unrelated elements that are waiting to reveal themselves in the wilds of statistical inquiry. For science, much like a good dad joke, is full of delightful surprises waiting to be unearthed.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of zoologists in New Mexico and Google searches for 'lost my wallet'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Zoologist-Zoinks Connection: Uncovering the Wallet-Wildlife Correlation in New Mexico

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the peculiar relationship between the number of zoologists in New Mexico and Google searches for "lost my wallet". Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team embarked on a mission to unravel this enigmatic connection. The findings unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.6716816 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 2007 to 2022, shedding light on this uncanny correlation.

It appears that as the population of zoologists in New Mexico increases, so does the frequency of Google searches related to misplaced wallets. This unexpected relationship offers a new angle for understanding human behavior in response to wildlife sightings. One can’t help but ponder if the wallets are not just lost, but have embarked on a wild adventure of their own, perhaps attempting to join a local herd of roaming bison.

With these findings in mind, we encourage the integration of wallet-tracking devices into the toolkit of every diligent zoologist, ensuring that wildlife enthusiasts are not unwittingly aiding in the distribution of potential wallet-related chaos. After all, we wouldn't want wallets to become the latest endangered species, now would we?

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As the late, great Charles Darwin once said, "It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change." And in the ever-evolving landscape of scientific inquiry, it seems that even the most unpredictable of correlations can reveal insightful connections. This leads us to the peculiar relationship between the number of zoologists in New Mexico and the frequency of Google searches for "lost my wallet", prompting us to wonder if wallets have become the new elusive species in the wild.
Now, before we delve into the nitty-gritty statistical analysis, let's address the elephant in the room – or should we say, the bison? Yes, that’s right – while studying the strange link between zoologists and missing wallets, we felt the need to acknowledge the potential “herd mentality” of these wayward wallets, perhaps seeking to blend in among the local wildlife. It's as if their natural camouflage is a wallet-sized bison costume hiding in plain sight!
Our journey into this unique correlation began with a pang of curiosity and a dash of skepticism, much like the start of a wild safari. Yet, armed with data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team ventured forth, equipped with a compass for navigating through the jungle of statistical significance and a pair of binoculars for keeping a keen eye on the surprising correlations. It's fair to say we were truly "wallet-armed" for our expedition!
As we scrutinized the data, what we uncovered was a correlation coefficient of 0.6716816 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 2007 to 2022, a result that left us as astonished as a chameleon finding itself in a box of crayons. The findings not only raised eyebrows but also raised the question of whether wallets, much like certain species, exhibit migratory patterns influenced by zoological activity in their vicinity. It's almost as if wallets have taken on the behavior of elusive creatures, a phenomenon we might dub as "pocket-sized rangers on the move"!
Through the lens of our research, it becomes clear that the bond between zoologists and misplaced wallets is more than mere coincidence; it offers a fascinating perspective on the interplay between human behavior and encounters with wildlife. As we reflect on these unexpected findings, one can't help but appreciate the inexplicable ways in which the world of science continuously astonishes and amuses us. After all, who would have thought that a study on zoologists and wallets could lead to such walletful revelations?
With these discoveries in hand, we invite you on a whimsical expedition into the enigmatic realm of zoologists, missing wallets, and the wild wonders that unfold when seemingly disparate variables collide. So, grab your wallet (and try not to lose it) as we embark on this scientific safari through the untamed wilderness of unexpected correlations.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between the number of zoologists in New Mexico and Google searches for "lost my wallet" yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.6716816, indicating a moderately strong positive correlation. We were, quite frankly, as surprised as a deer in headlights at this unexpected finding.
In addition, the r-squared value of 0.4511561 suggests that approximately 45.12% of the variance in wallet-related searches can be explained by the variance in the number of zoologists. It's clear that something truly wild is afoot here – enough to make even the most level-headed statistician furrow their brows in wonder.
The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the significance of the observed relationship, providing compelling evidence that this correlation is not merely a fluke. It seems that the allure of the animal kingdom is not limited to wildlife enthusiasts alone but extends its reach to the realm of missing personal effects, as well. It's almost as if the wallets are trying to tell us, “I’ll be beary happy if you come find me!”
We present a visual depiction of this compelling correlation in Fig. 1, which illustrates a scatterplot showcasing the positive relationship between the two variables. It's quite the sight to behold – a veritable snapshot of zoologists and wallets dancing in statistical harmony, like an elegant waltz in the wild.
This unexpected discovery not only challenges traditional notions of wildlife-human interaction but also offers a playful reminder that science is full of surprises. Just when you think you’ve seen it all, a correlation like this comes along and leaves you scratching your head, much like a curious raccoon pondering the mysteries of the universe.
Upon pondering this unique association, one can’t help but wonder if perhaps the wallets, much like a flock of birds, have sensed a newfound kinship with the zoological community. Perhaps they have adopted the mantra “bird of a feather, herd together” in their own quirky way. It's as if they are urging us to remember that statistical relationships, much like the animal kingdom, can often be filled with unexpected twists and turns.
In conclusion, our findings not only reveal a noteworthy correlation between the number of zoologists in New Mexico and Google searches for "lost my wallet" but also invite us to embrace the unpredictable and whimsical nature of scientific inquiry. After all, who said that statistics couldn’t be as entertaining as a barrel of monkeys?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our expedition into the mystical realm of correlations between zoologists and lost wallets has uncovered a delightfully peculiar relationship that tickles the funny bone as much as it boggles the mind. Our findings have not only provided statistical evidence of a surprising connection but have also illuminated the uncharted territory where wildlife encounters and human behavior intersect. It's as if the wallets are saying, "Hey, did you misplace me, or should I join a wildlife tour?"

The correlation coefficient of 0.6716816 has left us as astonished as a dodo encountering a smartphone – who would have thought that such a seemingly unrelated pairing could reveal such a strong statistical bond? We're tempted to propose a new creature, the 'wallet-ho' – an elusive hybrid that mysteriously disappears into the wild.

With an r-squared value of 0.4511561 and a p-value of less than 0.01, we can assert with confidence that this correlation is no statistical fluke. It's almost as if the wallets are rallying a chorus of "wallet-lyon" to make their presence known in the zoological landscape.

As we bid adieu to this whimsical scientific safari, we're compelled to acknowledge that our findings, much like the wallets in question, are rich in surprises. Perhaps it's a gentle nudge to remind us that scientific inquiry, much like a box of chocolates, is always full of unexpected delights and inexplicable wonders.

In light of these revelatory findings, we confidently assert that further research in this area is as unnecessary as a fish riding a bicycle. It's safe to say that this correlation has been explored to the fullest – and then some. So, let's leave no stone unturned and no wallet unfound, as we bid farewell to the delightful absurdity that is the Zoologist-Zoinks Connection.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Zoologist-Zoinks Connection: Uncovering the Wallet-Wildlife Correlation in New Mexico. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Ecological Quirks and Curiosities


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Zoologist-Zoinks Connection: Uncovering the Wallet-Wildlife Correlation in New Mexico. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for the Preservation of Novel Wildlife Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Zoologist-Zoinks Connection: Uncovering the Wallet-Wildlife Correlation in New Mexico with an abstract of This paper delves into the peculiar relationship between the number of zoologists in New Mexico and Google searches for "lost my wallet". Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, our research team embarked on a mission to unravel this enigmatic connection. The findings unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.6716816 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 2007 to 2022, shedding light on this uncanny correlation.
It appears that as the population of zoologists in New Mexico increases, so does the frequency of Google searches related to misplaced wallets. This unexpected relationship offers a new angle for understanding human behavior in response to wildlife sightings. One can’t help but ponder if the wallets are not just lost, but have embarked on a wild adventure of their own, perhaps attempting to join a local herd of roaming bison.
With these findings in mind, we encourage the integration of wallet-tracking devices into the toolkit of every diligent zoologist, ensuring that wildlife enthusiasts are not unwittingly aiding in the distribution of potential wallet-related chaos. After all, we wouldn't want wallets to become the latest endangered species, now would we?

ChatGPT:

zoologists, New Mexico, correlation, Google searches, lost my wallet, wildlife, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Google Trends, population, human behavior, wallet tracking devices, endangered species

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of zoologists in New Mexico
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of zoologists and wildlife biologists in New Mexico
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of zoologists in New Mexico

Google searches for 'lost my wallet'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'lost my wallet' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'lost my wallet'

Correlation r = 0.6716816 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.4511561 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 45.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'lost my wallet') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of zoologists in New Mexico) over the 16 years from 2007 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0044. 0.0043788623391489995000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.67 in 0.44% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 228 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 15 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 15 because we have two variables measured over a period of 16 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.26, 0.88 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
The number of zoologists in New Mexico (Laborers)100100160100160200190190140160200180210170200150
Google searches for 'lost my wallet' (Rel. search volume)1529.083334.916739.833341.166750.7556.2552.559.563.166772.833369.166769.333356.333377.916782.1667




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([100,100,160,100,160,200,190,190,140,160,200,180,210,170,200,150,])
array_2 = np.array([15,29.0833,34.9167,39.8333,41.1667,50.75,56.25,52.5,59.5,63.1667,72.8333,69.1667,69.3333,56.3333,77.9167,82.1667,])
array_1_name = "The number of zoologists in New Mexico"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'lost my wallet'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is much appreciated!


Correlation ID: 2269 · Black Variable ID: 11802 · Red Variable ID: 1464
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0