Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
Report an error
Google searches for 'easy bake oven' correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of gas plant operators in Michigan | r=0.93 | 13yrs | Yes! |
Number of pirate attacks in Indonesia | r=0.93 | 15yrs | No |
Season wins for the Denver Broncos | r=0.88 | 16yrs | No |
Ticket sales for Pittsburgh Pirates games | r=0.88 | 12yrs | No |
Culinary Associates degrees awarded | r=0.88 | 11yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Bradley | r=0.86 | 15yrs | No |
Kerosene used in Guatemala | r=0.84 | 14yrs | No |
The number of computer programmers in Washington | r=0.81 | 15yrs | No |
Novak Djokovic's ATP title wins | r=0.75 | 15yrs | Yes! |
The number of movies Dwayne Johnson appeared in | r=0.66 | 16yrs | No |
The Winning Score of The Northern Trust Open Golf Championship | r=0.65 | 15yrs | Yes! |
The number of physicists in Massachusetts | r=0.62 | 15yrs | No |
Season wins for the Carolina Panthers | r=0.54 | 16yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'easy bake oven' also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)