about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,947 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Novak Djokovic's ATP title wins and the second variable is Google searches for 'easy bake oven'.  The chart goes from 2008 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As Novak Djokovic's ATP title wins increased, his exceptional hand-eye coordination and precise movements inspired more kids to take up tennis. Many of these aspiring young players also happened to be fans of easy bake ovens, leading to a surge in interest in both tennis and culinary delights among the youth. It's a smashing success for both sports and baking enthusiasts alike!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie, where Novak Djokovic stands on a grand podium in the middle of a bustling city. The city is vivid and brimming with vibrant colors. Novak Djokovic is seen raising the ATP trophy high above his head, his victory pose exuding a sense of accomplishment. In the background, a group of people are gathered around a computer, their expressions filled with excitement and curiosity as they eagerly search online for "easy bake oven." The scene captures a sense of celebration and anticipation, with the city's hustle and bustle adding to the dynamic and lively atmosphere. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Novak Djokovic's ATP title wins and Google searches for 'easy bake oven'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cybernetic art Sci-fi fantacy An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie inspired by bauhaus Macabre
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Novak Djokovic's ATP title wins and Google searches for 'easy bake oven' together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling city, Novak Djokovic stands on a podium, raising the ATP trophy high above his head, while in the background, a group of people are gathered around a computer, eagerly searching online for "easy bake oven."

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling city, Novak Djokovic stands on a podium, raising the ATP trophy high above his head, while in the background, a group of people are gathered around a computer, eagerly searching online for "easy bake oven." Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie, where Novak Djokovic stands on a grand podium in the middle of a bustling city. The city is vivid and brimming with vibrant colors. Novak Djokovic is seen raising the ATP trophy high above his head, his victory pose exuding a sense of accomplishment. In the background, a group of people are gathered around a computer, their expressions filled with excitement and curiosity as they eagerly search online for "easy bake oven." The scene captures a sense of celebration and anticipation, with the city's hustle and bustle adding to the dynamic and lively atmosphere.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Novak Djokovic's ATP title wins positively influenced easy bake oven (Google searches for 'easy bake oven').

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
A Grand Slam of Baking: A Correlative Study between Novak Djokovic's ATP Title Wins and Google Searches for 'Easy Bake Oven'

The Journal of Sporty Culinary Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Novak Djokovic's ATP title wins and Google searches for 'easy bake oven'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from Wikipedia and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7452864 and p < 0.01 for 2008 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
A Grand Slam of Baking: A Correlative Study between Novak Djokovic's ATP Title Wins and Google Searches for 'Easy Bake Oven'

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between sports achievements and unconventional search trends has long been a topic of amusement, with previous studies exploring correlations between athletic performance and everything from avocado toast to pet grooming services. In this research, we set out to investigate the unlikely yet intriguing association between Novak Djokovic's ATP title wins and Google searches for 'Easy Bake Oven'. Leveraging data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, we conducted a thorough analysis covering the period from 2008 to 2022. Notably, our study unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.7452864 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust statistical connection between the tennis player's triumphs on the court and the online interest in miniature baking appliances. While the nature of this correlation remains enshrouded in mystery, our findings underscore the unconventional interplay between elite athletic performances and seemingly unrelated search patterns. This research not only sheds light on the whimsical antics of internet users but also highlights the peculiar nuances of human behavior in the digital age.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Novak Djokovic's ATP title wins and Google searches for 'easy bake oven'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Grand Slam of Baking: A Correlative Study between Novak Djokovic's ATP Title Wins and Google Searches for 'Easy Bake Oven'

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between sports achievements and unconventional search trends has long been a topic of amusement, with previous studies exploring correlations between athletic performance and everything from avocado toast to pet grooming services. In this research, we set out to investigate the unlikely yet intriguing association between Novak Djokovic's ATP title wins and Google searches for 'Easy Bake Oven'. Leveraging data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, we conducted a thorough analysis covering the period from 2008 to 2022. Notably, our study unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.7452864 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust statistical connection between the tennis player's triumphs on the court and the online interest in miniature baking appliances. While the nature of this correlation remains enshrouded in mystery, our findings underscore the unconventional interplay between elite athletic performances and seemingly unrelated search patterns. This research not only sheds light on the whimsical antics of internet users but also highlights the peculiar nuances of human behavior in the digital age.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The quest for uncovering unexpected correlations between seemingly disparate phenomena has long been the hallmark of scientific inquiry. From the whimsical to the downright absurd, scientists have tirelessly ventured into the uncharted territory of bizarre associations, determined to bring to light the peculiar interactions that govern our world. In this vein, we delve into the intersection of athletic prowess and culinary curiosity, exploring the hitherto uncharted territory of the correlation, if any, between Novak Djokovic's ATP title wins and the surge in Google searches for the venerable 'Easy Bake Oven'.

Imagine the surprise on the faces of esteemed researchers as they stumble upon the delightful yet confounding relationship between a tennis titan's conquests on the court and the culinary escapades of amateur bakers scouring the internet for diminutive, lightbulb-powered baking appliances. Indeed, the expanse of human intrigue knows no bounds, as illustrated by the amusing escapade this study embodies.

As we embark on this curious expedition through the labyrinth of statistics and internet absurdity, it is imperative to acknowledge the whimsical allure of this research endeavor. For as much as we tout rigour and statistical significance, we are also navigating the realm of the utterly whimsical and the wondrously incongruous, embracing the comedic side of scientific inquiry. And so, with an appreciative nod to the eccentricities of the human psyche, we unravel the tapestry of correlations and causations in the most unexpected of domains.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Novak Djokovic's ATP title wins and Google searches for 'easy bake oven'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Grand Slam of Baking: A Correlative Study between Novak Djokovic's ATP Title Wins and Google Searches for 'Easy Bake Oven'

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between sports achievements and unconventional search trends has long been a topic of amusement, with previous studies exploring correlations between athletic performance and everything from avocado toast to pet grooming services. In this research, we set out to investigate the unlikely yet intriguing association between Novak Djokovic's ATP title wins and Google searches for 'Easy Bake Oven'. Leveraging data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, we conducted a thorough analysis covering the period from 2008 to 2022. Notably, our study unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.7452864 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust statistical connection between the tennis player's triumphs on the court and the online interest in miniature baking appliances. While the nature of this correlation remains enshrouded in mystery, our findings underscore the unconventional interplay between elite athletic performances and seemingly unrelated search patterns. This research not only sheds light on the whimsical antics of internet users but also highlights the peculiar nuances of human behavior in the digital age.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The quest for uncovering unexpected correlations between seemingly disparate phenomena has long been the hallmark of scientific inquiry. From the whimsical to the downright absurd, scientists have tirelessly ventured into the uncharted territory of bizarre associations, determined to bring to light the peculiar interactions that govern our world. In this vein, we delve into the intersection of athletic prowess and culinary curiosity, exploring the hitherto uncharted territory of the correlation, if any, between Novak Djokovic's ATP title wins and the surge in Google searches for the venerable 'Easy Bake Oven'.
Imagine the surprise on the faces of esteemed researchers as they stumble upon the delightful yet confounding relationship between a tennis titan's conquests on the court and the culinary escapades of amateur bakers scouring the internet for diminutive, lightbulb-powered baking appliances. Indeed, the expanse of human intrigue knows no bounds, as illustrated by the amusing escapade this study embodies.
As we embark on this curious expedition through the labyrinth of statistics and internet absurdity, it is imperative to acknowledge the whimsical allure of this research endeavor. For as much as we tout rigour and statistical significance, we are also navigating the realm of the utterly whimsical and the wondrously incongruous, embracing the comedic side of scientific inquiry. And so, with an appreciative nod to the eccentricities of the human psyche, we unravel the tapestry of correlations and causations in the most unexpected of domains.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith et al. (2015) conducted a study examining the surprising connection between athletes and seemingly unrelated consumer behavior. Their findings showcased the unexpected correlation between LeBron James' NBA playoff performances and the sale of avocado toast in urban areas. This study set a precedent for our exploration into the enigmatic relationship between Novak Djokovic's ATP title wins and the surge in Google searches for the 'Easy Bake Oven.' The study by Doe (2017) further delved into the realm of sports and internet trends, uncovering a statistical link between Lionel Messi's goal-scoring streaks and the demand for pet grooming services.

In "The Statistics of Sports: An Unconventional Perspective," Jones (2019) delves into the realm of statistical anomalies and sheds light on the peculiar interplay between athletic achievements and seemingly unrelated consumer behavior. The book explores the statistical methodologies behind investigating correlations in unconventional domains, piquing the curiosity of researchers in search of whimsical connections.

Turning to non-fiction works, "Cooking with Data: Unveiling the Statistical Recipes of Culinary Curiosities" by Brown (2020) offers an insightful analysis of the interplay between culinary phenomena and statistical correlations. While the focus is primarily on traditional cooking trends, the book's exploration of statistical oddities lays the groundwork for our investigation into the curious relationship between Djokovic's athletic triumphs and the unusual online fascination with miniature baking appliances.

On the fictional front, "The Mystery of the Baking Championships" by Green (2018) provides a whimsical portrayal of a world where sporting prowess and culinary delights intertwine in unexpected ways. The book's narrative flair and imaginative scenarios add a touch of levity to our exploration of the improbable correlation between Djokovic's successes and the surge in 'Easy Bake Oven' searches.

As we venture further into the realm of unexpected correlations, it is pertinent to note the unconventional sources that have influenced our understanding of this peculiar phenomenon. In our pursuit of offbeat connections, unconventional inspirations such as the backs of shampoo bottles and the musings of misplaced fortune cookies have also proven instrumental, offering unique perspectives that have contributed to our comprehensive review of the literature.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Novak Djokovic's ATP title wins and Google searches for 'easy bake oven'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and Google Trends . You used data from 2008 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Grand Slam of Baking: A Correlative Study between Novak Djokovic's ATP Title Wins and Google Searches for 'Easy Bake Oven'

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between sports achievements and unconventional search trends has long been a topic of amusement, with previous studies exploring correlations between athletic performance and everything from avocado toast to pet grooming services. In this research, we set out to investigate the unlikely yet intriguing association between Novak Djokovic's ATP title wins and Google searches for 'Easy Bake Oven'. Leveraging data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, we conducted a thorough analysis covering the period from 2008 to 2022. Notably, our study unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.7452864 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust statistical connection between the tennis player's triumphs on the court and the online interest in miniature baking appliances. While the nature of this correlation remains enshrouded in mystery, our findings underscore the unconventional interplay between elite athletic performances and seemingly unrelated search patterns. This research not only sheds light on the whimsical antics of internet users but also highlights the peculiar nuances of human behavior in the digital age.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The quest for uncovering unexpected correlations between seemingly disparate phenomena has long been the hallmark of scientific inquiry. From the whimsical to the downright absurd, scientists have tirelessly ventured into the uncharted territory of bizarre associations, determined to bring to light the peculiar interactions that govern our world. In this vein, we delve into the intersection of athletic prowess and culinary curiosity, exploring the hitherto uncharted territory of the correlation, if any, between Novak Djokovic's ATP title wins and the surge in Google searches for the venerable 'Easy Bake Oven'.
Imagine the surprise on the faces of esteemed researchers as they stumble upon the delightful yet confounding relationship between a tennis titan's conquests on the court and the culinary escapades of amateur bakers scouring the internet for diminutive, lightbulb-powered baking appliances. Indeed, the expanse of human intrigue knows no bounds, as illustrated by the amusing escapade this study embodies.
As we embark on this curious expedition through the labyrinth of statistics and internet absurdity, it is imperative to acknowledge the whimsical allure of this research endeavor. For as much as we tout rigour and statistical significance, we are also navigating the realm of the utterly whimsical and the wondrously incongruous, embracing the comedic side of scientific inquiry. And so, with an appreciative nod to the eccentricities of the human psyche, we unravel the tapestry of correlations and causations in the most unexpected of domains.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:

The first step in our zany expedition into the world of statistical oddities involved the retrieval of data. Leveraging the stalwart repositories of information that are Wikipedia and Google Trends, we meticulously gathered data pertaining to Novak Djokovic's ATP title wins from 2008 to 2022. Additionally, we plumped for this unconventional task of scouring the internet for the frequency of searches related to the timeless, lightbulb-illuminated marvel that is the 'Easy Bake Oven'. We obtained Google search volume data for this delectably enlightening subject over the same time period.

Data Analysis:

With our trove of data in hand, we tiptoed into the wondrous world of statistics. Employing the formidable tools of correlation analysis and regression modeling, we sought to unravel the enigma of the relationship between Djokovic's sterling triumphs on the courts and the heightened interest in culinary contraptions that could just as easily double as experimental scientific apparatuses. We calculated the correlation coefficient, akin to a sneaky Pikachu peeking out from the sea of data, and the p-value, wielding the significance of a koala bear nonchalantly munching on eucalyptus. These statistical measures provided us with the necessary ammunition to tease out the potential concealed connection between these seemingly incongruent variables.

Control Variables:

In our valiant attempts to sidestep confounding influences and maintain the integrity of our analysis, we considered various external factors that could meddle with the presumed association between Djokovic's laurels and the surge in Easy Bake Oven inquiries. These included global economic trends, meteorological idiosyncrasies, and the proliferation of cringe-worthy dad jokes on social media. By rigorously accounting for these factors, we sought to ensure that the observed correlation was not merely a mischievous mirage, but a genuine phenomenon deserving closer inspection.

Ethical Considerations:

While the internet is a playground teeming with eccentric inquiries and whimsical capers, we approached our data and analysis with utmost solemnity. Our commitment to scientific integrity and statistical rigor knew no bounds, even as we chuckled at the serendipitous absurdity of our chosen research questions. All data handling and analytical procedures were conducted in accordance with the standards of academic conduct, despite the undeniable temptation to unleash the latent comedy within our statistical findings.

This peculiar blend of rigorous methodology and whimsical subject matter set the stage for a research journey that encapsulates the curious convergence of the comical and the scientific. As we present our findings in the following sections, we invite our readers to relish the delightful interplay between statistical inquiry and the lighthearted whimsy of internet curiosities.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Novak Djokovic's ATP title wins and Google searches for 'easy bake oven'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and Google Trends .

For the time period 2008 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.7452864, r-squared of 0.5554518, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A Grand Slam of Baking: A Correlative Study between Novak Djokovic's ATP Title Wins and Google Searches for 'Easy Bake Oven'

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between sports achievements and unconventional search trends has long been a topic of amusement, with previous studies exploring correlations between athletic performance and everything from avocado toast to pet grooming services. In this research, we set out to investigate the unlikely yet intriguing association between Novak Djokovic's ATP title wins and Google searches for 'Easy Bake Oven'. Leveraging data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, we conducted a thorough analysis covering the period from 2008 to 2022. Notably, our study unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.7452864 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust statistical connection between the tennis player's triumphs on the court and the online interest in miniature baking appliances. While the nature of this correlation remains enshrouded in mystery, our findings underscore the unconventional interplay between elite athletic performances and seemingly unrelated search patterns. This research not only sheds light on the whimsical antics of internet users but also highlights the peculiar nuances of human behavior in the digital age.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The quest for uncovering unexpected correlations between seemingly disparate phenomena has long been the hallmark of scientific inquiry. From the whimsical to the downright absurd, scientists have tirelessly ventured into the uncharted territory of bizarre associations, determined to bring to light the peculiar interactions that govern our world. In this vein, we delve into the intersection of athletic prowess and culinary curiosity, exploring the hitherto uncharted territory of the correlation, if any, between Novak Djokovic's ATP title wins and the surge in Google searches for the venerable 'Easy Bake Oven'.
Imagine the surprise on the faces of esteemed researchers as they stumble upon the delightful yet confounding relationship between a tennis titan's conquests on the court and the culinary escapades of amateur bakers scouring the internet for diminutive, lightbulb-powered baking appliances. Indeed, the expanse of human intrigue knows no bounds, as illustrated by the amusing escapade this study embodies.
As we embark on this curious expedition through the labyrinth of statistics and internet absurdity, it is imperative to acknowledge the whimsical allure of this research endeavor. For as much as we tout rigour and statistical significance, we are also navigating the realm of the utterly whimsical and the wondrously incongruous, embracing the comedic side of scientific inquiry. And so, with an appreciative nod to the eccentricities of the human psyche, we unravel the tapestry of correlations and causations in the most unexpected of domains.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.7452864 between Novak Djokovic's ATP title wins and Google searches for 'Easy Bake Oven', indicating a moderate to strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was calculated to be 0.5554518, signifying that approximately 55.55% of the variance in the popularity of the 'Easy Bake Oven' searches can be explained by the number of ATP titles won by the tennis maestro. The p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence to assert the presence of a significant correlation, strengthening the case for further exploration of this unanticipated connection.

In Figure 1, the scatterplot graphically depicts the interplay between Novak Djokovic's ATP title victories and the frequency of 'Easy Bake Oven' searches. The data points exhibit a discernible pattern, with an upward trend indicative of the simultaneous rise in both variables, validating the robustness of the statistical relationship. As the search interest in the diminutive baking apparatus surges, aligning closely with Djokovic's tournament triumphs, one cannot help but marvel at the whimsical dance of human curiosity and its intriguing manifestation in cyberspace.

The unexpected confluence of a tennis legend's accomplishments and the digital quests for culinary contraptions underscores the enchanting complexity of human behavior. While our analysis has unveiled a statistically significant correlation, the underlying mechanisms driving this association elude conventional explanations, inviting further contemplation and speculation. This study not only adds a touch of levity to scientific inquiry but also accentuates the delightfully absurd connections that punctuate the fabric of our digital interactions.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Novak Djokovic's ATP title wins and Google searches for 'easy bake oven'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
A Grand Slam of Baking: A Correlative Study between Novak Djokovic's ATP Title Wins and Google Searches for 'Easy Bake Oven'

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between sports achievements and unconventional search trends has long been a topic of amusement, with previous studies exploring correlations between athletic performance and everything from avocado toast to pet grooming services. In this research, we set out to investigate the unlikely yet intriguing association between Novak Djokovic's ATP title wins and Google searches for 'Easy Bake Oven'. Leveraging data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, we conducted a thorough analysis covering the period from 2008 to 2022. Notably, our study unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.7452864 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust statistical connection between the tennis player's triumphs on the court and the online interest in miniature baking appliances. While the nature of this correlation remains enshrouded in mystery, our findings underscore the unconventional interplay between elite athletic performances and seemingly unrelated search patterns. This research not only sheds light on the whimsical antics of internet users but also highlights the peculiar nuances of human behavior in the digital age.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith et al. (2015) conducted a study examining the surprising connection between athletes and seemingly unrelated consumer behavior. Their findings showcased the unexpected correlation between LeBron James' NBA playoff performances and the sale of avocado toast in urban areas. This study set a precedent for our exploration into the enigmatic relationship between Novak Djokovic's ATP title wins and the surge in Google searches for the 'Easy Bake Oven.' The study by Doe (2017) further delved into the realm of sports and internet trends, uncovering a statistical link between Lionel Messi's goal-scoring streaks and the demand for pet grooming services.
In "The Statistics of Sports: An Unconventional Perspective," Jones (2019) delves into the realm of statistical anomalies and sheds light on the peculiar interplay between athletic achievements and seemingly unrelated consumer behavior. The book explores the statistical methodologies behind investigating correlations in unconventional domains, piquing the curiosity of researchers in search of whimsical connections.
Turning to non-fiction works, "Cooking with Data: Unveiling the Statistical Recipes of Culinary Curiosities" by Brown (2020) offers an insightful analysis of the interplay between culinary phenomena and statistical correlations. While the focus is primarily on traditional cooking trends, the book's exploration of statistical oddities lays the groundwork for our investigation into the curious relationship between Djokovic's athletic triumphs and the unusual online fascination with miniature baking appliances.
On the fictional front, "The Mystery of the Baking Championships" by Green (2018) provides a whimsical portrayal of a world where sporting prowess and culinary delights intertwine in unexpected ways. The book's narrative flair and imaginative scenarios add a touch of levity to our exploration of the improbable correlation between Djokovic's successes and the surge in 'Easy Bake Oven' searches.
As we venture further into the realm of unexpected correlations, it is pertinent to note the unconventional sources that have influenced our understanding of this peculiar phenomenon. In our pursuit of offbeat connections, unconventional inspirations such as the backs of shampoo bottles and the musings of misplaced fortune cookies have also proven instrumental, offering unique perspectives that have contributed to our comprehensive review of the literature.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.7452864 between Novak Djokovic's ATP title wins and Google searches for 'Easy Bake Oven', indicating a moderate to strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was calculated to be 0.5554518, signifying that approximately 55.55% of the variance in the popularity of the 'Easy Bake Oven' searches can be explained by the number of ATP titles won by the tennis maestro. The p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence to assert the presence of a significant correlation, strengthening the case for further exploration of this unanticipated connection.
In Figure 1, the scatterplot graphically depicts the interplay between Novak Djokovic's ATP title victories and the frequency of 'Easy Bake Oven' searches. The data points exhibit a discernible pattern, with an upward trend indicative of the simultaneous rise in both variables, validating the robustness of the statistical relationship. As the search interest in the diminutive baking apparatus surges, aligning closely with Djokovic's tournament triumphs, one cannot help but marvel at the whimsical dance of human curiosity and its intriguing manifestation in cyberspace.
The unexpected confluence of a tennis legend's accomplishments and the digital quests for culinary contraptions underscores the enchanting complexity of human behavior. While our analysis has unveiled a statistically significant correlation, the underlying mechanisms driving this association elude conventional explanations, inviting further contemplation and speculation. This study not only adds a touch of levity to scientific inquiry but also accentuates the delightfully absurd connections that punctuate the fabric of our digital interactions.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The nexus between Novak Djokovic's ATP laurels and the Cyberian clamoring for 'Easy Bake Oven' feeds our insatiable appetites for whimsical connection. As we burrow deeper into the perplexing labyrinth where athletic prowess meets autonomous baking appliances, our findings amplify the flamboyant interplay of statistical anomalies and fanciful fascinations.

Our results fortify the claims put forth by Smith et al. (2015) and Doe (2017), affirming the existence of a pervasive correlation between athletic triumphs and seemingly unrelated consumer propensities. The statistical tryst between Djokovic's on-court escapades and the digital crusade for petite ovens resonates with the captivating dance elucidated by Jones (2019), emboldening the narrative of improbable correlations within the statistical realm.

The scatterplot visually encapsulates the intoxicating synchrony between Djokovic's victories and the escalating ardor for miniature confectionary implements. This harmonious display mirrors the lyrical stratagem of 'The Mystery of the Baking Championships' (Green, 2018), weaving a fanciful tapestry where sporting theatrics and gustatory reveries intertwine in an exuberant serenade. The embrace of unconventional inspirations, such as the backs of shampoo bottles and the capricious counsel of disoriented fortune cookies, has enriched our understanding of this whimsical phenomenon, painting a surreal tableau within the scientific landscape.

As we relish the persistent inquiry into the esoteric connection between Djokovic and the 'Easy Bake Oven', we must acknowledge the delightful repartee between human caprice and digital dalliance. This revelry adds a dash of humor to the staid corridors of scientific disquisition, underscoring the inimitable charm of offbeat connections that embellish our technological interactions.

In unraveling the enigma that undergirds this statistical concord, we celebrate the enigmatic synergy between statistical ordainment and digital reverie - a ballet of piquant proportions that brings a lighthearted twirl to the gravitas of empirical exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Novak Djokovic's ATP title wins and Google searches for 'easy bake oven'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
A Grand Slam of Baking: A Correlative Study between Novak Djokovic's ATP Title Wins and Google Searches for 'Easy Bake Oven'

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between sports achievements and unconventional search trends has long been a topic of amusement, with previous studies exploring correlations between athletic performance and everything from avocado toast to pet grooming services. In this research, we set out to investigate the unlikely yet intriguing association between Novak Djokovic's ATP title wins and Google searches for 'Easy Bake Oven'. Leveraging data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, we conducted a thorough analysis covering the period from 2008 to 2022. Notably, our study unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.7452864 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust statistical connection between the tennis player's triumphs on the court and the online interest in miniature baking appliances. While the nature of this correlation remains enshrouded in mystery, our findings underscore the unconventional interplay between elite athletic performances and seemingly unrelated search patterns. This research not only sheds light on the whimsical antics of internet users but also highlights the peculiar nuances of human behavior in the digital age.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The quest for uncovering unexpected correlations between seemingly disparate phenomena has long been the hallmark of scientific inquiry. From the whimsical to the downright absurd, scientists have tirelessly ventured into the uncharted territory of bizarre associations, determined to bring to light the peculiar interactions that govern our world. In this vein, we delve into the intersection of athletic prowess and culinary curiosity, exploring the hitherto uncharted territory of the correlation, if any, between Novak Djokovic's ATP title wins and the surge in Google searches for the venerable 'Easy Bake Oven'.
Imagine the surprise on the faces of esteemed researchers as they stumble upon the delightful yet confounding relationship between a tennis titan's conquests on the court and the culinary escapades of amateur bakers scouring the internet for diminutive, lightbulb-powered baking appliances. Indeed, the expanse of human intrigue knows no bounds, as illustrated by the amusing escapade this study embodies.
As we embark on this curious expedition through the labyrinth of statistics and internet absurdity, it is imperative to acknowledge the whimsical allure of this research endeavor. For as much as we tout rigour and statistical significance, we are also navigating the realm of the utterly whimsical and the wondrously incongruous, embracing the comedic side of scientific inquiry. And so, with an appreciative nod to the eccentricities of the human psyche, we unravel the tapestry of correlations and causations in the most unexpected of domains.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.7452864 between Novak Djokovic's ATP title wins and Google searches for 'Easy Bake Oven', indicating a moderate to strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was calculated to be 0.5554518, signifying that approximately 55.55% of the variance in the popularity of the 'Easy Bake Oven' searches can be explained by the number of ATP titles won by the tennis maestro. The p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence to assert the presence of a significant correlation, strengthening the case for further exploration of this unanticipated connection.
In Figure 1, the scatterplot graphically depicts the interplay between Novak Djokovic's ATP title victories and the frequency of 'Easy Bake Oven' searches. The data points exhibit a discernible pattern, with an upward trend indicative of the simultaneous rise in both variables, validating the robustness of the statistical relationship. As the search interest in the diminutive baking apparatus surges, aligning closely with Djokovic's tournament triumphs, one cannot help but marvel at the whimsical dance of human curiosity and its intriguing manifestation in cyberspace.
The unexpected confluence of a tennis legend's accomplishments and the digital quests for culinary contraptions underscores the enchanting complexity of human behavior. While our analysis has unveiled a statistically significant correlation, the underlying mechanisms driving this association elude conventional explanations, inviting further contemplation and speculation. This study not only adds a touch of levity to scientific inquiry but also accentuates the delightfully absurd connections that punctuate the fabric of our digital interactions.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our foray into the enigmatic nexus of Novak Djokovic's ATP victories and the burgeoning interest in 'Easy Bake Oven' searches has revealed a correlation of surprising magnitude and statistical robustness. The evidence presented in this study not only affirms the existence of a significant link between the tennis virtuoso's on-court conquests and the fascination with miniature baking contraptions, but also invites a light-hearted exploration of the whimsical dimensions of human behavior. As we bid adieu to this peculiar yet delightful odyssey through statistics and cyber-culinary curiosities, it is hard not to appreciate the sheer audacity of the human mind to forge connections in the most improbable of realms. With a gentle nod to the capricious realms of research and a touch of statistical seasoning, we humbly submit this study's findings, alongside the understanding that perhaps, there are some phenomena in this world that demand no further investigation. For in the realm of tennis and tiny ovens, the sweet spot has unequivocally been found, and no more research is needed in this area.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited A Grand Slam of Baking: A Correlative Study between Novak Djokovic's ATP Title Wins and Google Searches for 'Easy Bake Oven'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Sporty Culinary Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited A Grand Slam of Baking: A Correlative Study between Novak Djokovic's ATP Title Wins and Google Searches for 'Easy Bake Oven'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Culinary and Athletic Symbiosis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled A Grand Slam of Baking: A Correlative Study between Novak Djokovic's ATP Title Wins and Google Searches for 'Easy Bake Oven' with an abstract of The relationship between sports achievements and unconventional search trends has long been a topic of amusement, with previous studies exploring correlations between athletic performance and everything from avocado toast to pet grooming services. In this research, we set out to investigate the unlikely yet intriguing association between Novak Djokovic's ATP title wins and Google searches for 'Easy Bake Oven'. Leveraging data from Wikipedia and Google Trends, we conducted a thorough analysis covering the period from 2008 to 2022. Notably, our study unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.7452864 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust statistical connection between the tennis player's triumphs on the court and the online interest in miniature baking appliances. While the nature of this correlation remains enshrouded in mystery, our findings underscore the unconventional interplay between elite athletic performances and seemingly unrelated search patterns. This research not only sheds light on the whimsical antics of internet users but also highlights the peculiar nuances of human behavior in the digital age.

ChatGPT:

Novak Djokovic, ATP title wins, Google searches, Easy Bake Oven, correlation study, sports achievements, Google Trends, statistical analysis, online interest, human behavior, digital age

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Novak Djokovic's ATP title wins
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Novak Djokovic's ATP title wins

Google searches for 'easy bake oven'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'easy bake oven' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'easy bake oven'

Correlation r = 0.7452864 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.5554518 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 55.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'easy bake oven') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Novak Djokovic's ATP title wins) over the 15 years from 2008 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0014. 0.0014283326092710286000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.75 in 0.14% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 700 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 14 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 14 because we have two variables measured over a period of 15 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.38, 0.91 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Novak Djokovic's ATP title wins (Title win)45210677117245455
Google searches for 'easy bake oven' (Rel. search volume)17.833316.166716.2521.583323.833324.2523.333326.166719.333316.333315.583314.916716.916714.916714.1667




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4,5,2,10,6,7,7,11,7,2,4,5,4,5,5,])
array_2 = np.array([17.8333,16.1667,16.25,21.5833,23.8333,24.25,23.3333,26.1667,19.3333,16.3333,15.5833,14.9167,16.9167,14.9167,14.1667,])
array_1_name = "Novak Djokovic's ATP title wins"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'easy bake oven'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the correlation whisperer we needed!


Correlation ID: 1947 · Black Variable ID: 93 · Red Variable ID: 1420
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0