Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
Report an error
Google searches for 'i am dizzy' correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Master's degrees awarded in Military technologies | r=1 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Solar power generated in Kazakhstan | r=0.99 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Biomass power generated in Serbia | r=0.99 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Solar power generated in Dominican Republic | r=0.99 | 10yrs | Yes! |
The distance between Neptune and Uranus | r=0.98 | 20yrs | No |
Butter consumption | r=0.98 | 18yrs | No |
Cost to send a letter via the USPS | r=0.98 | 17yrs | Yes! |
The Coca-Cola Company's stock price (KO) | r=0.98 | 20yrs | No |
McDonald's stock price (MCD) | r=0.98 | 20yrs | No |
The number of consultants in New York | r=0.98 | 19yrs | No |
Annual Revenue of the Lego Group | r=0.98 | 19yrs | No |
Total wind power generated globally | r=0.98 | 18yrs | No |
Arch Capital Group's stock price (ACGL) | r=0.95 | 20yrs | No |
Wind power generated in Bosnia and Herzegovina | r=0.95 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Master's degrees awarded in Psychology | r=0.93 | 10yrs | No |
SAP SE's stock price (SAP) | r=0.91 | 20yrs | No |
Annual revenue from Disney movies | r=0.77 | 11yrs | No |
Google searches for 'i am dizzy' also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)