Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
Report an error
Google searches for 'download firefox' correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the 'whip nae nae' meme | r=0.98 | 9yrs | No |
Master's degrees awarded in Transportation | r=0.98 | 10yrs | No |
Pirate attacks globally | r=0.97 | 14yrs | Yes! |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Social sciences and history | r=0.97 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Master's degrees awarded in literature | r=0.97 | 10yrs | No |
Master's degrees awarded in Liberal arts | r=0.96 | 10yrs | No |
GMO use in corn grown in Wisconsin | r=0.96 | 20yrs | Yes! |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Education | r=0.95 | 10yrs | No |
Master's degrees awarded in Social sciences and history | r=0.95 | 10yrs | No |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in gender studies | r=0.94 | 10yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Chloe | r=0.92 | 19yrs | No |
GMO use in corn grown in Illinois | r=0.88 | 20yrs | Yes! |
The distance between Saturn and Jupiter | r=0.85 | 20yrs | No |
GMO use in corn grown in Michigan | r=0.85 | 20yrs | Yes! |
Number of edits to the Wikipedia article for Goldman Sachs | r=0.84 | 20yrs | No |
Number of World of Warcraft Subscribers | r=0.81 | 18yrs | No |
Google searches for 'download firefox' also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)