about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,300 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and the second variable is Google searches for 'download firefox'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the GMO use in Michigan corn decreased, corn mazes became wildly popular. Participants navigated the mazes to find the non-GMO corn, inadvertently stumbling upon hidden computer terminals. This led to a statewide surge in unauthorized Firefox downloads, prompting the authorities to launch a campaign: "Get lost in the corn, not online!"

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image depicting a farm in Michigan, with rows of towering cornstalks gently swaying in the breeze. At the center of the field, there is a large, old-fashioned computer tower nestled among the crops, connected to the cornstalks with a web of wires. On the computer screen, glitched versions of web browsers like Mozilla Firefox are displayed, each showing small, pixelated images of download servers. These servers are linked to each individual cornstalk with glowing, intricate threads. As the farmers stop tending to the corn, the threads begin to disconnect one by one, causing the download servers to slowly fade away, leaving the internet with a sense of emptiness and frustration. The image should convey a blend of nature and technology, with glitch art elements adding a sense of digital distortion and surrealism to the scene. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: Because GMO corn in Michigan was actually a secret ingredient in the Mozilla Firefox web browser, and when farmers stopped using it, the internet lost its connection to the download servers. It turns out, GMO corn was the key to faster download speeds and now we're all stuck waiting.. Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A photo-realistic image Glitch art Vaporwave Magic realism Cyber folk
ChatGPT: Glitch art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. Because GMO corn in Michigan was actually a secret ingredient in the Mozilla Firefox web browser, and when farmers stopped using it, the internet lost its connection to the download servers. It turns out, GMO corn was the key to faster download speeds and now we're all stuck waiting.
ChatGPT: Imagine a farm in Michigan where rows of tall, green cornstalks sway gently in the breeze. A large, old-fashioned computer tower is nestled in the middle of the cornfield, connected to the stalks with wires. On the computer screen, web browsers like Mozilla Firefox are displayed, and small, pixelated images of download servers are linked to each cornstalk with tiny, glowing threads. As the farmers stop tending to the corn, the threads disconnect one by one, causing the download servers to slowly fade away, leaving the internet with a sense of emptiness and frustration.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Glitch art ] and depicting this scene: Imagine a farm in Michigan where rows of tall, green cornstalks sway gently in the breeze. A large, old-fashioned computer tower is nestled in the middle of the cornfield, connected to the stalks with wires. On the computer screen, web browsers like Mozilla Firefox are displayed, and small, pixelated images of download servers are linked to each cornstalk with tiny, glowing threads. As the farmers stop tending to the corn, the threads disconnect one by one, causing the download servers to slowly fade away, leaving the internet with a sense of emptiness and frustration. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image depicting a farm in Michigan, with rows of towering cornstalks gently swaying in the breeze. At the center of the field, there is a large, old-fashioned computer tower nestled among the crops, connected to the cornstalks with a web of wires. On the computer screen, glitched versions of web browsers like Mozilla Firefox are displayed, each showing small, pixelated images of download servers. These servers are linked to each individual cornstalk with glowing, intricate threads. As the farmers stop tending to the corn, the threads begin to disconnect one by one, causing the download servers to slowly fade away, leaving the internet with a sense of emptiness and frustration. The image should convey a blend of nature and technology, with glitch art elements adding a sense of digital distortion and surrealism to the scene.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in GMO use in corn grown in Michigan caused download firefox (Google searches for 'download firefox') to decrease. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Genetically Modified Maize in Michigan: An Analysis of its Impact on Google Searches for 'Download Firefox'

The Journal of Transgenic Agriculture and Internet Search Trends

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and Google searches for 'download firefox'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from USDA and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8479397 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Genetically Modified Maize in Michigan: An Analysis of its Impact on Google Searches for 'Download Firefox'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present an in-depth investigation into the unexpected relationship between the cultivation of genetically modified maize (GMO corn) in Michigan and Google searches for 'Download Firefox'. Our research team utilized data from the USDA on GMO corn production and Google Trends analytics for 'Download Firefox' searches to analyze the temporal patterns and potential correlations. The juxtaposition of agricultural biotechnology and internet browsing trends may seem far-fetched, but the results reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8479397 with p < 0.01, spanning the years 2004 to 2023. This study sheds light on the curious interplay between agricultural practices and internet behavior, prompting further exploration into the interconnectivity of seemingly disparate domains. We hope our findings will cultivate a sense of curiosity and spark kernels of insight into the intricate web of influences on modern human behavior.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and Google searches for 'download firefox'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Genetically Modified Maize in Michigan: An Analysis of its Impact on Google Searches for 'Download Firefox'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present an in-depth investigation into the unexpected relationship between the cultivation of genetically modified maize (GMO corn) in Michigan and Google searches for 'Download Firefox'. Our research team utilized data from the USDA on GMO corn production and Google Trends analytics for 'Download Firefox' searches to analyze the temporal patterns and potential correlations. The juxtaposition of agricultural biotechnology and internet browsing trends may seem far-fetched, but the results reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8479397 with p < 0.01, spanning the years 2004 to 2023. This study sheds light on the curious interplay between agricultural practices and internet behavior, prompting further exploration into the interconnectivity of seemingly disparate domains. We hope our findings will cultivate a sense of curiosity and spark kernels of insight into the intricate web of influences on modern human behavior.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

The cultivation and consumption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have garnered significant attention and debate in recent years. Genetically modified maize, commonly referred to as GMO corn, has been a focal point of controversy and curiosity due to its potential implications for human health, ecological sustainability, and economic dynamics. Amidst the fervent discussions surrounding GMOs, a peculiar and unexpected correlation between the production of GMO corn in Michigan and Google searches for 'Download Firefox' has emerged. This seemingly perplexing relationship has piqued the curiosity of our research team and prompted a rigorous investigation into its underlying mechanisms.

Our study delves into the interplay between agricultural practices, technological advancements, and online behavior, aiming to unravel the enigmatic connection between GMO corn and internet browsing patterns. The juxtaposition of these seemingly disparate domains raises intriguing questions about the intricate web of influences that shape human actions and decisions in the digital age.

While it may seem far-fetched to draw parallels between the production of GMO corn and Google searches for a web browser, our preliminary analysis has unveiled a statistically significant correlation that extends over nearly two decades. This unexpected finding sparks a kernel of curiosity, prompting us to embark on a comprehensive exploration of the temporal patterns and potential causative factors underlying this association.

As we navigate through the complex landscape of GMO cultivation and internet search trends, we recognize the need to approach this investigation with a blend of scientific rigor and creative inquiry. Our endeavor opens a new frontier in interdisciplinary research, offering a glimpse into the interconnected tapestry of agriculture, technology, and human behavior.

In the forthcoming sections of this paper, we present our methodological approach, data analysis techniques, and the nuanced implications of our findings. Through this endeavor, we endeavor to plant the seeds of thoughtful investigation and cultivate a rich harvest of insight into the whimsical interconnections that shape the fabric of our modern world.

(End of the introduction section)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and Google searches for 'download firefox'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Genetically Modified Maize in Michigan: An Analysis of its Impact on Google Searches for 'Download Firefox'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present an in-depth investigation into the unexpected relationship between the cultivation of genetically modified maize (GMO corn) in Michigan and Google searches for 'Download Firefox'. Our research team utilized data from the USDA on GMO corn production and Google Trends analytics for 'Download Firefox' searches to analyze the temporal patterns and potential correlations. The juxtaposition of agricultural biotechnology and internet browsing trends may seem far-fetched, but the results reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8479397 with p < 0.01, spanning the years 2004 to 2023. This study sheds light on the curious interplay between agricultural practices and internet behavior, prompting further exploration into the interconnectivity of seemingly disparate domains. We hope our findings will cultivate a sense of curiosity and spark kernels of insight into the intricate web of influences on modern human behavior.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The cultivation and consumption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have garnered significant attention and debate in recent years. Genetically modified maize, commonly referred to as GMO corn, has been a focal point of controversy and curiosity due to its potential implications for human health, ecological sustainability, and economic dynamics. Amidst the fervent discussions surrounding GMOs, a peculiar and unexpected correlation between the production of GMO corn in Michigan and Google searches for 'Download Firefox' has emerged. This seemingly perplexing relationship has piqued the curiosity of our research team and prompted a rigorous investigation into its underlying mechanisms.
Our study delves into the interplay between agricultural practices, technological advancements, and online behavior, aiming to unravel the enigmatic connection between GMO corn and internet browsing patterns. The juxtaposition of these seemingly disparate domains raises intriguing questions about the intricate web of influences that shape human actions and decisions in the digital age.
While it may seem far-fetched to draw parallels between the production of GMO corn and Google searches for a web browser, our preliminary analysis has unveiled a statistically significant correlation that extends over nearly two decades. This unexpected finding sparks a kernel of curiosity, prompting us to embark on a comprehensive exploration of the temporal patterns and potential causative factors underlying this association.
As we navigate through the complex landscape of GMO cultivation and internet search trends, we recognize the need to approach this investigation with a blend of scientific rigor and creative inquiry. Our endeavor opens a new frontier in interdisciplinary research, offering a glimpse into the interconnected tapestry of agriculture, technology, and human behavior.
In the forthcoming sections of this paper, we present our methodological approach, data analysis techniques, and the nuanced implications of our findings. Through this endeavor, we endeavor to plant the seeds of thoughtful investigation and cultivate a rich harvest of insight into the whimsical interconnections that shape the fabric of our modern world.
(End of the introduction section)

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between genetically modified maize cultivation and internet browsing habits may appear whimsically incongruous at first glance, yet empirical evidence suggests an intriguing correlation that warrants closer examination. Early investigations by Smith et al. (2010) and Doe (2012) initially explored the impact of GMO corn production on agricultural yields, environmental sustainability, and human health. However, our quest for understanding veers into uncharted territory as we seek to unravel the enigmatic alliance between agricultural biotechnology and cyber explorations.

In their seminal work, "The Ecology of Genetically Modified Crops," Jones and Brown (2015) delve into the ecological ramifications of GMO cultivation, shedding light on the intricate interplay between transgenic crops and the environment. The unanticipated intertwining of GMO corn in Michigan with Google searches for 'Download Firefox' prompts us to consider the uncharted territory of techno-agricultural ecology.

Expanding our purview beyond conventional academic literature, we venture into the realm of non-fiction works that address the juxtaposition of technology and agriculture. "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "Guns, Germs, and Steel" by Jared Diamond offer insightful perspectives on the intricate interplay between human civilizations, agricultural practices, and technological evolution. While these esteemed authors do not explicitly broach the topic of internet browsing habits, the underlying themes of interconnectedness and adaptation serve as thought-provoking companions on our scholarly expedition.

In a departure from traditional academia, we dare to draw inspiration from the realm of fiction, where the boundaries of plausibility are delightfully blurred. The dystopian landscapes depicted in Margaret Atwood's "Oryx and Crake" and the techno-agrarian musings of Neal Stephenson's "Snow Crash" spark speculative contemplation on the fusion of biotechnology and virtual quests for web browsers.

Venturing into the unexplored terrain of popular culture, we rekindle childhood memories of Saturday morning cartoons and children's shows for fresh perspectives. The zany antics of Dexter's Laboratory, where science and experimentation collide in a whirlwind of comical chaos, serve as a whimsical parallel to our quest for unraveling the inexplicable link between GMO corn production and internet search behaviors.

As we embark on this scholarly odyssey, we embrace the spirit of inquiry, tempered by a touch of mirth, to navigate the curious confluence of agricultural biotechnology and online escapades. In the next section, we unravel the methodological framework that underpins our whimsical pursuit of understanding.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and Google searches for 'download firefox'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Genetically Modified Maize in Michigan: An Analysis of its Impact on Google Searches for 'Download Firefox'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present an in-depth investigation into the unexpected relationship between the cultivation of genetically modified maize (GMO corn) in Michigan and Google searches for 'Download Firefox'. Our research team utilized data from the USDA on GMO corn production and Google Trends analytics for 'Download Firefox' searches to analyze the temporal patterns and potential correlations. The juxtaposition of agricultural biotechnology and internet browsing trends may seem far-fetched, but the results reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8479397 with p < 0.01, spanning the years 2004 to 2023. This study sheds light on the curious interplay between agricultural practices and internet behavior, prompting further exploration into the interconnectivity of seemingly disparate domains. We hope our findings will cultivate a sense of curiosity and spark kernels of insight into the intricate web of influences on modern human behavior.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The cultivation and consumption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have garnered significant attention and debate in recent years. Genetically modified maize, commonly referred to as GMO corn, has been a focal point of controversy and curiosity due to its potential implications for human health, ecological sustainability, and economic dynamics. Amidst the fervent discussions surrounding GMOs, a peculiar and unexpected correlation between the production of GMO corn in Michigan and Google searches for 'Download Firefox' has emerged. This seemingly perplexing relationship has piqued the curiosity of our research team and prompted a rigorous investigation into its underlying mechanisms.
Our study delves into the interplay between agricultural practices, technological advancements, and online behavior, aiming to unravel the enigmatic connection between GMO corn and internet browsing patterns. The juxtaposition of these seemingly disparate domains raises intriguing questions about the intricate web of influences that shape human actions and decisions in the digital age.
While it may seem far-fetched to draw parallels between the production of GMO corn and Google searches for a web browser, our preliminary analysis has unveiled a statistically significant correlation that extends over nearly two decades. This unexpected finding sparks a kernel of curiosity, prompting us to embark on a comprehensive exploration of the temporal patterns and potential causative factors underlying this association.
As we navigate through the complex landscape of GMO cultivation and internet search trends, we recognize the need to approach this investigation with a blend of scientific rigor and creative inquiry. Our endeavor opens a new frontier in interdisciplinary research, offering a glimpse into the interconnected tapestry of agriculture, technology, and human behavior.
In the forthcoming sections of this paper, we present our methodological approach, data analysis techniques, and the nuanced implications of our findings. Through this endeavor, we endeavor to plant the seeds of thoughtful investigation and cultivate a rich harvest of insight into the whimsical interconnections that shape the fabric of our modern world.
(End of the introduction section)

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

METHODOLOGY

Data Collection and Preprocessing:
Our research team embarked on a quest for data, scouring the vast expanse of the internet in search of pertinent information. We diligently harvested data from reliable sources, primarily drawing upon the comprehensive dataset from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) detailing the production and dissemination of genetically modified maize in Michigan. Additionally, we harnessed the power of Google Trends, a digital oracle of internet search trends, to secure the search volume index for 'Download Firefox' from 2004 to 2023. The confluence of these disparate datasets lay the groundwork for our investigation, sowing the seeds of curiosity and yielding a bountiful harvest of information.

Experimental Design:
With data in hand, we undertook the task of designing an experimental framework that would reap meaningful insights from the fertile soil of our datasets. Adopting a hybrid approach seamlessly blending statistical analysis and digital archaeology, we crafted a convoluted yet meticulous method to unfold the intricate relationship between GMO corn cultivation and internet browsing behavior. Our model incorporated an array of temporal and comparative analyses, cultivating a holistic understanding of the temporal patterns and potential correlations that lay beneath the surface of our datasets.

Statistical Analysis:
As researchers, we understand the paramount importance of statistical rigor in untangling the vines of correlation from the jungle of data. We employed advanced statistical techniques, nurturing the data with time series analysis, correlation coefficients, and inferential tests to distill the essence of the relationship between GMO corn production and 'Download Firefox' searches. The numerical crops that emerged from our statistical orchard provided a robust foundation for our interpretations, feeding into our understanding of the interplay between agricultural biotechnology and cyberforaging behavior.

Data Interpretation and Synthesis:
Having traversed the valleys of data collection and statistical analysis, we ascended to the summit of data interpretation – a journey that demanded both analytical prowess and a keen eye for holistic synthesis. Like botanists studying a diverse ecosystem, we carefully examined the tendrils of correlation, causation, and temporal dynamics that intertwined GMO corn production and online browser searches. Our examination yielded a rich tapestry of insights, incorporating nuanced observations and unexpected patterns that germinated our understanding of this uncharted correlation.

Ethical Considerations:
In the fertile soil of academic research, ethical considerations serve as the essential nutrients that sustain the burgeoning garden of knowledge. Our methodology adhered to the highest ethical standards, ensuring the respectful and responsible use of data while nurturing a culture of transparency and integrity. We honored the principles of data privacy and security, upholding the sanctity of individual online behavior while cultivating a verdant landscape of academic inquiry.

Limitations:
As we tread through the rich terrain of scientific inquiry, we recognize the presence of limitations that cast shadows over our endeavor. The dynamic nature of digital behavior, the evolving landscape of internet technology, and the multifaceted realm of agricultural dynamics pose as lush thickets, concealing potential confounders and unexplored pathways in our exploration. Our interpretation of causation, therefore, must be approached with cautious optimism, acknowledging the verdant uncertainties that spring forth in the field of interdisciplinary research.

In the forthcoming sections, we unveil the ripe fruits of our research inquiry, presenting the nuanced implications, unexpected insights, and the promising avenues that blossom from our exploration of the connection between GMO corn cultivation in Michigan and online foraging for internet browsers.

(End of the methodology section)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and Google searches for 'download firefox'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.8479397, r-squared of 0.7190018, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Genetically Modified Maize in Michigan: An Analysis of its Impact on Google Searches for 'Download Firefox'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present an in-depth investigation into the unexpected relationship between the cultivation of genetically modified maize (GMO corn) in Michigan and Google searches for 'Download Firefox'. Our research team utilized data from the USDA on GMO corn production and Google Trends analytics for 'Download Firefox' searches to analyze the temporal patterns and potential correlations. The juxtaposition of agricultural biotechnology and internet browsing trends may seem far-fetched, but the results reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8479397 with p < 0.01, spanning the years 2004 to 2023. This study sheds light on the curious interplay between agricultural practices and internet behavior, prompting further exploration into the interconnectivity of seemingly disparate domains. We hope our findings will cultivate a sense of curiosity and spark kernels of insight into the intricate web of influences on modern human behavior.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
The cultivation and consumption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have garnered significant attention and debate in recent years. Genetically modified maize, commonly referred to as GMO corn, has been a focal point of controversy and curiosity due to its potential implications for human health, ecological sustainability, and economic dynamics. Amidst the fervent discussions surrounding GMOs, a peculiar and unexpected correlation between the production of GMO corn in Michigan and Google searches for 'Download Firefox' has emerged. This seemingly perplexing relationship has piqued the curiosity of our research team and prompted a rigorous investigation into its underlying mechanisms.
Our study delves into the interplay between agricultural practices, technological advancements, and online behavior, aiming to unravel the enigmatic connection between GMO corn and internet browsing patterns. The juxtaposition of these seemingly disparate domains raises intriguing questions about the intricate web of influences that shape human actions and decisions in the digital age.
While it may seem far-fetched to draw parallels between the production of GMO corn and Google searches for a web browser, our preliminary analysis has unveiled a statistically significant correlation that extends over nearly two decades. This unexpected finding sparks a kernel of curiosity, prompting us to embark on a comprehensive exploration of the temporal patterns and potential causative factors underlying this association.
As we navigate through the complex landscape of GMO cultivation and internet search trends, we recognize the need to approach this investigation with a blend of scientific rigor and creative inquiry. Our endeavor opens a new frontier in interdisciplinary research, offering a glimpse into the interconnected tapestry of agriculture, technology, and human behavior.
In the forthcoming sections of this paper, we present our methodological approach, data analysis techniques, and the nuanced implications of our findings. Through this endeavor, we endeavor to plant the seeds of thoughtful investigation and cultivate a rich harvest of insight into the whimsical interconnections that shape the fabric of our modern world.
(End of the introduction section)

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

RESULTS

The statistical analysis of the data revealed a remarkably robust correlation between the cultivation of genetically modified maize (GMO corn) in Michigan and Google searches for 'Download Firefox'. The correlation coefficient, which measures the strength and direction of the linear relationship between the two variables, was calculated to be 0.8479397. This value signifies a strong positive correlation, indicating that as the production of GMO corn increased, there was a concomitant rise in the frequency of searches for 'Download Firefox'. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) further substantiated the strength of this association, yielding a value of 0.7190018. This implies that approximately 71.9% of the variability in 'Download Firefox' searches can be attributed to the changes in GMO corn production.

The p-value obtained from the analysis was less than 0.01, signifying a statistically significant relationship between GMO corn cultivation and 'Download Firefox' searches. This indicates that the observed correlation is unlikely to have occurred by random chance alone, providing compelling evidence for a meaningful connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.

Additionally, the graphical representation of the correlation, as depicted in Figure 1, further underscores the compelling nature of the relationship. The scatterplot highlights the strong positive linear trend between GMO corn production and 'Download Firefox' searches, visually reinforcing the outcomes of the statistical analysis.

This unexpected and intriguing correlation prompts a reevaluation of our understanding of the interplay between agricultural practices and digital behavior. While the underlying mechanisms driving this relationship warrant further exploration, our findings exemplify the intricacies of modern societal influences and the potential for unanticipated intersections between seemingly disconnected domains.

The coherent alignment of GMO corn and 'Download Firefox' searches ignites an intellectual spark, compelling us to delve deeper into the enigmatic linkages that underpin human actions in the contemporary era. This research opens avenues for interdisciplinary inquiry, cultivating a fertile ground for the cultivation of novel insights and the cultivation of a greater understanding of the intertwined facets of human behavior.

The unexpected convergence of GMO corn and internet browsing behavior thus serves as a cornerstone for future investigations, seeding the fertile ground for further exploration into the whimsical interconnections that shape the fabric of our modern world.

In conclusion, the interrelationship between GMO corn cultivation in Michigan and Google searches for 'Download Firefox' offers a tantalizing glimpse into the multifaceted influences that shape human interactions in the digital age. This study not only underscores the surprising potential for cross-disciplinary correlations but also sows the seeds for future inquiry into the curious interplay between agriculture, technology, and human behavior.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and Google searches for 'download firefox'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Genetically Modified Maize in Michigan: An Analysis of its Impact on Google Searches for 'Download Firefox'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present an in-depth investigation into the unexpected relationship between the cultivation of genetically modified maize (GMO corn) in Michigan and Google searches for 'Download Firefox'. Our research team utilized data from the USDA on GMO corn production and Google Trends analytics for 'Download Firefox' searches to analyze the temporal patterns and potential correlations. The juxtaposition of agricultural biotechnology and internet browsing trends may seem far-fetched, but the results reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8479397 with p < 0.01, spanning the years 2004 to 2023. This study sheds light on the curious interplay between agricultural practices and internet behavior, prompting further exploration into the interconnectivity of seemingly disparate domains. We hope our findings will cultivate a sense of curiosity and spark kernels of insight into the intricate web of influences on modern human behavior.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between genetically modified maize cultivation and internet browsing habits may appear whimsically incongruous at first glance, yet empirical evidence suggests an intriguing correlation that warrants closer examination. Early investigations by Smith et al. (2010) and Doe (2012) initially explored the impact of GMO corn production on agricultural yields, environmental sustainability, and human health. However, our quest for understanding veers into uncharted territory as we seek to unravel the enigmatic alliance between agricultural biotechnology and cyber explorations.
In their seminal work, "The Ecology of Genetically Modified Crops," Jones and Brown (2015) delve into the ecological ramifications of GMO cultivation, shedding light on the intricate interplay between transgenic crops and the environment. The unanticipated intertwining of GMO corn in Michigan with Google searches for 'Download Firefox' prompts us to consider the uncharted territory of techno-agricultural ecology.
Expanding our purview beyond conventional academic literature, we venture into the realm of non-fiction works that address the juxtaposition of technology and agriculture. "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "Guns, Germs, and Steel" by Jared Diamond offer insightful perspectives on the intricate interplay between human civilizations, agricultural practices, and technological evolution. While these esteemed authors do not explicitly broach the topic of internet browsing habits, the underlying themes of interconnectedness and adaptation serve as thought-provoking companions on our scholarly expedition.
In a departure from traditional academia, we dare to draw inspiration from the realm of fiction, where the boundaries of plausibility are delightfully blurred. The dystopian landscapes depicted in Margaret Atwood's "Oryx and Crake" and the techno-agrarian musings of Neal Stephenson's "Snow Crash" spark speculative contemplation on the fusion of biotechnology and virtual quests for web browsers.
Venturing into the unexplored terrain of popular culture, we rekindle childhood memories of Saturday morning cartoons and children's shows for fresh perspectives. The zany antics of Dexter's Laboratory, where science and experimentation collide in a whirlwind of comical chaos, serve as a whimsical parallel to our quest for unraveling the inexplicable link between GMO corn production and internet search behaviors.
As we embark on this scholarly odyssey, we embrace the spirit of inquiry, tempered by a touch of mirth, to navigate the curious confluence of agricultural biotechnology and online escapades. In the next section, we unravel the methodological framework that underpins our whimsical pursuit of understanding.

[[RESULTS]]
RESULTS
The statistical analysis of the data revealed a remarkably robust correlation between the cultivation of genetically modified maize (GMO corn) in Michigan and Google searches for 'Download Firefox'. The correlation coefficient, which measures the strength and direction of the linear relationship between the two variables, was calculated to be 0.8479397. This value signifies a strong positive correlation, indicating that as the production of GMO corn increased, there was a concomitant rise in the frequency of searches for 'Download Firefox'. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) further substantiated the strength of this association, yielding a value of 0.7190018. This implies that approximately 71.9% of the variability in 'Download Firefox' searches can be attributed to the changes in GMO corn production.
The p-value obtained from the analysis was less than 0.01, signifying a statistically significant relationship between GMO corn cultivation and 'Download Firefox' searches. This indicates that the observed correlation is unlikely to have occurred by random chance alone, providing compelling evidence for a meaningful connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.
Additionally, the graphical representation of the correlation, as depicted in Figure 1, further underscores the compelling nature of the relationship. The scatterplot highlights the strong positive linear trend between GMO corn production and 'Download Firefox' searches, visually reinforcing the outcomes of the statistical analysis.
This unexpected and intriguing correlation prompts a reevaluation of our understanding of the interplay between agricultural practices and digital behavior. While the underlying mechanisms driving this relationship warrant further exploration, our findings exemplify the intricacies of modern societal influences and the potential for unanticipated intersections between seemingly disconnected domains.
The coherent alignment of GMO corn and 'Download Firefox' searches ignites an intellectual spark, compelling us to delve deeper into the enigmatic linkages that underpin human actions in the contemporary era. This research opens avenues for interdisciplinary inquiry, cultivating a fertile ground for the cultivation of novel insights and the cultivation of a greater understanding of the intertwined facets of human behavior.
The unexpected convergence of GMO corn and internet browsing behavior thus serves as a cornerstone for future investigations, seeding the fertile ground for further exploration into the whimsical interconnections that shape the fabric of our modern world.
In conclusion, the interrelationship between GMO corn cultivation in Michigan and Google searches for 'Download Firefox' offers a tantalizing glimpse into the multifaceted influences that shape human interactions in the digital age. This study not only underscores the surprising potential for cross-disciplinary correlations but also sows the seeds for future inquiry into the curious interplay between agriculture, technology, and human behavior.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The discovery of a significant statistical relationship between the growth of genetically modified maize (GMO corn) in Michigan and Google searches for 'Download Firefox' has, without a doubt, elicited surprise and amusement in equal measure. The investigation into this comically unexpected correlation aligns with the principle that delving into unusual domains of inquiry can yield captivating and illuminating insights. Remarkably, our results echo the findings of Smith et al. (2010) and Doe (2012), who, as it turns out, were unwitting trailblazers in unearthing the interplay between agricultural biotechnology and cyber ponderings.

The fortuitous connection between our whimsical investigation and the scholarly explorations of Jones and Brown (2015) stands as a testament to the unanticipated convergence of agro-technological phenomena and the abstract intricacies of online pursuits. Even as we add a dash of levity to the scholarly discourse, this relationship underscores the wondrous interconnectedness of seemingly disparate fields of study.

Engaging with non-fiction authors such as Michael Pollan and Jared Diamond, who may not have directly pondered the relationship between GMO corn and web browsing, provided a delightful juxtaposition that expanded the horizons of our inquiry. The dalliance with speculations from fiction writers proved to be oddly prescient, demonstrating that the boundaries of plausibility are pleasantly blurred. Furthermore, the nostalgic revisit to cartoons and children's shows pays homage to the playful spirit of inquiry and curiosity that underscores our scholarly escapade.

Our investigation leaves a cornucopia of opportunities for further scholarly endeavors, seeding the fertile ground for interdisciplinary inquiry with a healthy dose of whimsy. The unexpected convergence of GMO corn and internet browsing behavior in our findings serves as a springboard for cultivating a keen understanding of the multifaceted influences that shape human interactions in the digital era. In this spirit, we encourage fellow researchers to embrace the spirit of lighthearted inquiry in scholarly pursuits, for even the most improbable connections may yield kernels of truth and a-maize-ing discoveries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and Google searches for 'download firefox'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Genetically Modified Maize in Michigan: An Analysis of its Impact on Google Searches for 'Download Firefox'

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we present an in-depth investigation into the unexpected relationship between the cultivation of genetically modified maize (GMO corn) in Michigan and Google searches for 'Download Firefox'. Our research team utilized data from the USDA on GMO corn production and Google Trends analytics for 'Download Firefox' searches to analyze the temporal patterns and potential correlations. The juxtaposition of agricultural biotechnology and internet browsing trends may seem far-fetched, but the results reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8479397 with p < 0.01, spanning the years 2004 to 2023. This study sheds light on the curious interplay between agricultural practices and internet behavior, prompting further exploration into the interconnectivity of seemingly disparate domains. We hope our findings will cultivate a sense of curiosity and spark kernels of insight into the intricate web of influences on modern human behavior.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The cultivation and consumption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have garnered significant attention and debate in recent years. Genetically modified maize, commonly referred to as GMO corn, has been a focal point of controversy and curiosity due to its potential implications for human health, ecological sustainability, and economic dynamics. Amidst the fervent discussions surrounding GMOs, a peculiar and unexpected correlation between the production of GMO corn in Michigan and Google searches for 'Download Firefox' has emerged. This seemingly perplexing relationship has piqued the curiosity of our research team and prompted a rigorous investigation into its underlying mechanisms.
Our study delves into the interplay between agricultural practices, technological advancements, and online behavior, aiming to unravel the enigmatic connection between GMO corn and internet browsing patterns. The juxtaposition of these seemingly disparate domains raises intriguing questions about the intricate web of influences that shape human actions and decisions in the digital age.
While it may seem far-fetched to draw parallels between the production of GMO corn and Google searches for a web browser, our preliminary analysis has unveiled a statistically significant correlation that extends over nearly two decades. This unexpected finding sparks a kernel of curiosity, prompting us to embark on a comprehensive exploration of the temporal patterns and potential causative factors underlying this association.
As we navigate through the complex landscape of GMO cultivation and internet search trends, we recognize the need to approach this investigation with a blend of scientific rigor and creative inquiry. Our endeavor opens a new frontier in interdisciplinary research, offering a glimpse into the interconnected tapestry of agriculture, technology, and human behavior.
In the forthcoming sections of this paper, we present our methodological approach, data analysis techniques, and the nuanced implications of our findings. Through this endeavor, we endeavor to plant the seeds of thoughtful investigation and cultivate a rich harvest of insight into the whimsical interconnections that shape the fabric of our modern world.
(End of the introduction section)

[[RESULTS]]
RESULTS
The statistical analysis of the data revealed a remarkably robust correlation between the cultivation of genetically modified maize (GMO corn) in Michigan and Google searches for 'Download Firefox'. The correlation coefficient, which measures the strength and direction of the linear relationship between the two variables, was calculated to be 0.8479397. This value signifies a strong positive correlation, indicating that as the production of GMO corn increased, there was a concomitant rise in the frequency of searches for 'Download Firefox'. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) further substantiated the strength of this association, yielding a value of 0.7190018. This implies that approximately 71.9% of the variability in 'Download Firefox' searches can be attributed to the changes in GMO corn production.
The p-value obtained from the analysis was less than 0.01, signifying a statistically significant relationship between GMO corn cultivation and 'Download Firefox' searches. This indicates that the observed correlation is unlikely to have occurred by random chance alone, providing compelling evidence for a meaningful connection between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.
Additionally, the graphical representation of the correlation, as depicted in Figure 1, further underscores the compelling nature of the relationship. The scatterplot highlights the strong positive linear trend between GMO corn production and 'Download Firefox' searches, visually reinforcing the outcomes of the statistical analysis.
This unexpected and intriguing correlation prompts a reevaluation of our understanding of the interplay between agricultural practices and digital behavior. While the underlying mechanisms driving this relationship warrant further exploration, our findings exemplify the intricacies of modern societal influences and the potential for unanticipated intersections between seemingly disconnected domains.
The coherent alignment of GMO corn and 'Download Firefox' searches ignites an intellectual spark, compelling us to delve deeper into the enigmatic linkages that underpin human actions in the contemporary era. This research opens avenues for interdisciplinary inquiry, cultivating a fertile ground for the cultivation of novel insights and the cultivation of a greater understanding of the intertwined facets of human behavior.
The unexpected convergence of GMO corn and internet browsing behavior thus serves as a cornerstone for future investigations, seeding the fertile ground for further exploration into the whimsical interconnections that shape the fabric of our modern world.
In conclusion, the interrelationship between GMO corn cultivation in Michigan and Google searches for 'Download Firefox' offers a tantalizing glimpse into the multifaceted influences that shape human interactions in the digital age. This study not only underscores the surprising potential for cross-disciplinary correlations but also sows the seeds for future inquiry into the curious interplay between agriculture, technology, and human behavior.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our research has uncovered a rather kernel of insight into the interwoven world of GMO maize cultivation and Google searches for 'Download Firefox'. While the profound correlation coefficient of 0.8479397 highlights a statistically significant association that sprouts intrigue, it also leaves us pondering the evergreen question – what on earth could these seemingly unrelated phenomena have in common? The fertile soil of further exploration may yield a harvest of answers, but for now, this unexpected correlation may simply plant a seed of curiosity in the minds of researchers and aficionados alike. As we bid adieu to this peculiar interplay, it seems clear that no further ploughing of this particular furrow is needed. After all, as the saying goes, there's no need to beat a dead horse – especially if it's been genetically modified!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Genetically Modified Maize in Michigan: An Analysis of its Impact on Google Searches for 'Download Firefox'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Transgenic Agriculture and Internet Search Trends


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Genetically Modified Maize in Michigan: An Analysis of its Impact on Google Searches for 'Download Firefox'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Society for the Advancement of Unconventional Agricultural Practices


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Genetically Modified Maize in Michigan: An Analysis of its Impact on Google Searches for 'Download Firefox' with an abstract of In this paper, we present an in-depth investigation into the unexpected relationship between the cultivation of genetically modified maize (GMO corn) in Michigan and Google searches for 'Download Firefox'. Our research team utilized data from the USDA on GMO corn production and Google Trends analytics for 'Download Firefox' searches to analyze the temporal patterns and potential correlations. The juxtaposition of agricultural biotechnology and internet browsing trends may seem far-fetched, but the results reveal a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8479397 with p < 0.01, spanning the years 2004 to 2023. This study sheds light on the curious interplay between agricultural practices and internet behavior, prompting further exploration into the interconnectivity of seemingly disparate domains. We hope our findings will cultivate a sense of curiosity and spark kernels of insight into the intricate web of influences on modern human behavior.

ChatGPT:

Genetically modified maize Michigan, GMO corn cultivation impact, Google search trends, Download Firefox searches correlation, USDA GMO corn production data, Google Trends analytics, temporal patterns analysis, correlation coefficient, internet browsing behavior, agricultural practices effect, interconnected domains, modern human behavior influences

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn grown in Michigan
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in Michigan that is genetically modified to be herbicide-tolerant (HT), but not insect-resistant (Bt)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in Michigan

Google searches for 'download firefox'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'download firefox' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'download firefox'

Correlation r = 0.8479397 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7190018 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 71.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'download firefox') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in Michigan) over the 20 years from 2004 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.3E-6. 0.0000023447618139603700000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.85 in 0.00023% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 426,483 random variables You don't actually need 426 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.65, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
GMO use in corn grown in Michigan (GMO corn %)142018222420252426151516181511111312119
Google searches for 'download firefox' (Rel. search volume)10.7525.666730.333337.2548.083368.833377.416763.833343.166731.752519.83338.583337.833335.583334.666674.8333344.253




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([14,20,18,22,24,20,25,24,26,15,15,16,18,15,11,11,13,12,11,9,])
array_2 = np.array([10.75,25.6667,30.3333,37.25,48.0833,68.8333,77.4167,63.8333,43.1667,31.75,25,19.8333,8.58333,7.83333,5.58333,4.66667,4.83333,4,4.25,3,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in Michigan"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'download firefox'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Bravo! Your evaluation rocks!


Correlation ID: 1300 · Black Variable ID: 729 · Red Variable ID: 1397
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0