Spurious correlation #2,204 · View random
A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Pirate attacks globally and the second variable is Google searches for 'download firefox'. The chart goes from 2009 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time.

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Pirate attacks globally and the second variable is Google searches for 'download firefox'. The chart goes from 2009 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time.

Download png, svg

AI explanation

As pirate attacks decreased, more pirates decided to pursue careers in technology. These ex-pirates, with their love for the sea and all things nautical, joined forces with the Firefox web browser team, leading to the development of a new sea-themed update. This update, complete with a swashbuckling interface and an 'arrr-some' new features, created a wave of excitement in the tech world. As a result, people no longer just wanted to download Firefox, they wanted to 'yo-ho-ho' and download Firefox for the high seas of the internet! This ultimately led to a decrease in searches for 'download Firefox' as the browser became the go-to choice for anyone looking for a more 'ship-shape' internet browsing experience. So, remember, matey, it's not just about navigating the web, it's about setting sail on the digital seas with Firefox!

^{Show image generation prompt} Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s. Depict a world map with red skulls marking pirate attacks in the oceans and continents. Include a computer screen in the background showing multiple tabs open with Google searches for "download firefox" in different languages. The visual depiction should be simple and detailed. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.

This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Pirate attacks globally and Google searches for 'download firefox'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Brutalism Minimalism Cute 2D animation
ChatGPT: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Pirate attacks globally and Google searches for 'download firefox' together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A world map with red skulls marking pirate attacks in the oceans and continents, while a computer screen shows multiple tabs open with Google searches for "download firefox" in different languages.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s ] and depicting this scene: A world map with red skulls marking pirate attacks in the oceans and continents, while a computer screen shows multiple tabs open with Google searches for "download firefox" in different languages. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s. Depict a world map with red skulls marking pirate attacks in the oceans and continents. Include a computer screen in the background showing multiple tabs open with Google searches for "download firefox" in different languages. The visual depiction should be simple and detailed.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
^{Show prompt for explanation} Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Pirate attacks globally caused download firefox (Google searches for 'download firefox') to decrease. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)

Ahoy, Matey! Navigating the High Seas of Internet Search Behavior: A Correlational Analysis of Pirate Attacks and Google Searches for 'Download Firefox'

The Journal of Online Buccaneers and Cyber Searches

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!

^{Show prompt used to generate this paper} Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Pirate attacks globally and Google searches for 'download firefox'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Ahoy, Matey! Navigating the High Seas of Internet Search Behavior: A Correlational Analysis of Pirate Attacks and Google Searches for 'Download Firefox'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study delves into the unexpected and uncharted waters of the relationship between pirate attacks worldwide and the Google search term "download firefox." Leveraging data from Statista and Google Trends, we embarked on an empirical exploration to shed light on this enigmatic connection. Our findings revealed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9741997, with a significance level of p < 0.01, for the years 2009 to 2022. This paper illuminates the startling yet intriguing relationship between maritime piracy and individuals' proclivity to seek out an alternative web browser. The implications of this discovery provoke contemplation and bemusement, serving as a reminder that in the vast sea of internet behavior, unexpected currents can often lead to unforeseen destinations.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The oceans of internet search behavior are vast and sometimes treacherous, much like the high seas themselves. While the piratical exploits of yore have largely been consigned to the annals of history, the digital age has ushered in its own brand of piracy, albeit of a markedly different nature. The emergence of online piracy, characterized by unauthorized downloading and sharing of copyrighted content, has posed numerous challenges to the maritime, legal, and technological realms. However, in a curious twist of fate, our investigation has illuminated an intriguing correlation between this modern-day piracy and a seemingly unrelated phenomenon: the Google search term "download firefox."
The ubiquitous web browser Firefox, offered by the Mozilla Foundation, has long been the choice of many conscientious internet users and tech enthusiasts. Its commitment to privacy, open-source principles, and innovative features has earned it a dedicated following amid the vast expanse of browser options. However, what prompts individuals to seek out this particular browser, and why might this behavior be linked, however tangentially, to the domain of piracy?
Motivated by these ponderings, the present study seeks to navigate these uncharted waters and unravel the confounding relationship between pirate attacks globally and the esoteric search query "download firefox." Through a meticulous analysis of data culled from Statista, which documents incidents of pirate attacks across the globe, and Google Trends, which tracks the volume of searches for specific terms, we endeavored to tease out the patterns and interconnections that underpin these ostensibly disparate phenomena.
In the pages that follow, we present the findings of our empirical investigation, wherein we have uncovered a strikingly robust correlation between pirate attacks and Google searches for "download firefox," spanning the years 2009 to 2022. The implications of this unexpected linkage are as enigmatic as they are thought-provoking, traversing the realms of digital behavior, consumer preferences, and perhaps even the whims of the intrepid internet navigator.
We invite the reader to embark upon this scholarly voyage with us, as we unravel the intricacies of this intriguing correlation and contemplate the unforeseen currents that traverse the landscape of internet behavior. As we navigate these uncharted waters, it becomes manifest that the digital age, much like the maritime realm, harbors its own share of mysteries and unexpected connections, waiting to be discovered by those adventurous enough to venture forth.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

To contextualize the unexpected correlation between pirate attacks globally and the Google search term "download firefox," it is imperative to survey the existing literature on internet behavior, piracy, and web browsing habits. Smith et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of online search patterns and observed a discernible relationship between internet user demographics and their choice of web browsers. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2018) delved into the intricacies of digital piracy and its impact on consumer behavior, shedding light on the complex interplay between online content consumption and legal frameworks. However, these studies, while illuminating in their own right, have yet to explore the peculiar nexus between maritime piracy and the proclivity to seek an alternative web browser.

In "The Internet and Society" by Johnson (2019) and "Digital Piracy in the Modern Age" by Brown (2020), the authors emphasized the need to unravel the idiosyncrasies of internet behavior and the influence of technological advancements on consumer choices. These works provide a foundational understanding of the intricate tapestry of online activities and the broader societal implications thereof. However, the profound association between pirate attacks worldwide and the specific Google query "download firefox" remained conspicuously absent from their purview.

Turning to fictional works, the timeless classic "Treasure Island" by Stevenson (1883) and the swashbuckling saga "Pirates of the Caribbean" by Disney (2003) stimulate the imagination with their tales of maritime adventures and derring-do. While these literary and cinematic creations captivate audiences with their romanticized depictions of piracy, they offer little insight into the peculiar digital behaviors that underpin our contemporary internet landscape.

In the realm of animated entertainment, the whimsical escapades of "SpongeBob SquarePants" and the daring exploits of "Jake and the Never Land Pirates" beckon viewers into a realm of make-believe piracy. While these lighthearted portrayals of nautical hijinks entertain and amuse, they do little to elucidate the profound connection between real-world pirate activity and the inclination to download an alternative web browser.

In light of the dearth of academic inquiry into this cryptic synergy, our study ventures into uncharted waters to unravel the unforeseen convergence of pirate attacks and the Google search term "download firefox." As we navigate these enigmatic currents, we do so in the spirit of scholarly curiosity and a willingness to entertain unexpected revelations.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Pirate attacks globally and Google searches for 'download firefox'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Statista and Google Trends . You used data from 2009 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Ahoy, Matey! Navigating the High Seas of Internet Search Behavior: A Correlational Analysis of Pirate Attacks and Google Searches for 'Download Firefox'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study delves into the unexpected and uncharted waters of the relationship between pirate attacks worldwide and the Google search term "download firefox." Leveraging data from Statista and Google Trends, we embarked on an empirical exploration to shed light on this enigmatic connection. Our findings revealed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9741997, with a significance level of p < 0.01, for the years 2009 to 2022. This paper illuminates the startling yet intriguing relationship between maritime piracy and individuals' proclivity to seek out an alternative web browser. The implications of this discovery provoke contemplation and bemusement, serving as a reminder that in the vast sea of internet behavior, unexpected currents can often lead to unforeseen destinations.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The oceans of internet search behavior are vast and sometimes treacherous, much like the high seas themselves. While the piratical exploits of yore have largely been consigned to the annals of history, the digital age has ushered in its own brand of piracy, albeit of a markedly different nature. The emergence of online piracy, characterized by unauthorized downloading and sharing of copyrighted content, has posed numerous challenges to the maritime, legal, and technological realms. However, in a curious twist of fate, our investigation has illuminated an intriguing correlation between this modern-day piracy and a seemingly unrelated phenomenon: the Google search term "download firefox."
The ubiquitous web browser Firefox, offered by the Mozilla Foundation, has long been the choice of many conscientious internet users and tech enthusiasts. Its commitment to privacy, open-source principles, and innovative features has earned it a dedicated following amid the vast expanse of browser options. However, what prompts individuals to seek out this particular browser, and why might this behavior be linked, however tangentially, to the domain of piracy?
Motivated by these ponderings, the present study seeks to navigate these uncharted waters and unravel the confounding relationship between pirate attacks globally and the esoteric search query "download firefox." Through a meticulous analysis of data culled from Statista, which documents incidents of pirate attacks across the globe, and Google Trends, which tracks the volume of searches for specific terms, we endeavored to tease out the patterns and interconnections that underpin these ostensibly disparate phenomena.
In the pages that follow, we present the findings of our empirical investigation, wherein we have uncovered a strikingly robust correlation between pirate attacks and Google searches for "download firefox," spanning the years 2009 to 2022. The implications of this unexpected linkage are as enigmatic as they are thought-provoking, traversing the realms of digital behavior, consumer preferences, and perhaps even the whims of the intrepid internet navigator.
We invite the reader to embark upon this scholarly voyage with us, as we unravel the intricacies of this intriguing correlation and contemplate the unforeseen currents that traverse the landscape of internet behavior. As we navigate these uncharted waters, it becomes manifest that the digital age, much like the maritime realm, harbors its own share of mysteries and unexpected connections, waiting to be discovered by those adventurous enough to venture forth.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The present study employed a range of methodological approaches to navigate the elusive waters of the relationship between pirate attacks worldwide and Google searches for the phrase "download firefox." Data on pirate attacks spanning the years 2009 to 2022 was procured from the Global Incident Map, an online repository documenting reported incidents of maritime piracy across the globe. These reports were meticulously sifted through and cross-referenced to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information gathered.

In parallel, Google Trends, a tool provided by the ubiquitous search engine, was utilized to harvest data pertaining to the search interest over time for the term "download firefox." Given the mercurial nature of internet trends, the reliability and validity of the search volume data were subjected to rigorous scrutiny to discern any potential anomalies or irregularities.

The collected datasets were then subjected to a rigorous process of merging and alignment, akin to that of aligning the constellations in the night sky, to ensure temporal synchronicity and coherency. This methodological confluence aimed to facilitate a comprehensive analysis that could effectively capture the intricate interplay between the occurrences of pirate attacks and the fluctuations in Google searches for "download firefox."

To ascertain the statistical significance and robustness of the relationship between the aforementioned variables, a correlational analysis was conducted using the Pearson correlation coefficient. This approach sought to quantify the strength and direction of the linear relationship between the incidence of pirate attacks and the intensity of searches for "download firefox."

Furthermore, to expound upon the nuanced dynamics at play, a series of exploratory analyses were undertaken to discern potential temporal patterns, cyclical fluctuations, and any spatiotemporal associations that may underpin the observed correlation.

In summary, the methodological trajectory of this investigation was characterized by a systematic assembly of disparate data sources, a fervent quest for coherence and chronological alignment, and a quantitative interrogation of the relationship between pirate attacks and Google searches for "download firefox." This meandering journey across the expanse of digital data sought to unravel the cryptic correlation that has surfaced, illuminating an unforeseen connection that winds through the labyrinthine depths of internet behavior.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Pirate attacks globally and Google searches for 'download firefox'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Statista and Google Trends .

For the time period 2009 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9741997, r-squared of 0.9490651, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Ahoy, Matey! Navigating the High Seas of Internet Search Behavior: A Correlational Analysis of Pirate Attacks and Google Searches for 'Download Firefox'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study delves into the unexpected and uncharted waters of the relationship between pirate attacks worldwide and the Google search term "download firefox." Leveraging data from Statista and Google Trends, we embarked on an empirical exploration to shed light on this enigmatic connection. Our findings revealed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9741997, with a significance level of p < 0.01, for the years 2009 to 2022. This paper illuminates the startling yet intriguing relationship between maritime piracy and individuals' proclivity to seek out an alternative web browser. The implications of this discovery provoke contemplation and bemusement, serving as a reminder that in the vast sea of internet behavior, unexpected currents can often lead to unforeseen destinations.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
The oceans of internet search behavior are vast and sometimes treacherous, much like the high seas themselves. While the piratical exploits of yore have largely been consigned to the annals of history, the digital age has ushered in its own brand of piracy, albeit of a markedly different nature. The emergence of online piracy, characterized by unauthorized downloading and sharing of copyrighted content, has posed numerous challenges to the maritime, legal, and technological realms. However, in a curious twist of fate, our investigation has illuminated an intriguing correlation between this modern-day piracy and a seemingly unrelated phenomenon: the Google search term "download firefox."
The ubiquitous web browser Firefox, offered by the Mozilla Foundation, has long been the choice of many conscientious internet users and tech enthusiasts. Its commitment to privacy, open-source principles, and innovative features has earned it a dedicated following amid the vast expanse of browser options. However, what prompts individuals to seek out this particular browser, and why might this behavior be linked, however tangentially, to the domain of piracy?
Motivated by these ponderings, the present study seeks to navigate these uncharted waters and unravel the confounding relationship between pirate attacks globally and the esoteric search query "download firefox." Through a meticulous analysis of data culled from Statista, which documents incidents of pirate attacks across the globe, and Google Trends, which tracks the volume of searches for specific terms, we endeavored to tease out the patterns and interconnections that underpin these ostensibly disparate phenomena.
In the pages that follow, we present the findings of our empirical investigation, wherein we have uncovered a strikingly robust correlation between pirate attacks and Google searches for "download firefox," spanning the years 2009 to 2022. The implications of this unexpected linkage are as enigmatic as they are thought-provoking, traversing the realms of digital behavior, consumer preferences, and perhaps even the whims of the intrepid internet navigator.
We invite the reader to embark upon this scholarly voyage with us, as we unravel the intricacies of this intriguing correlation and contemplate the unforeseen currents that traverse the landscape of internet behavior. As we navigate these uncharted waters, it becomes manifest that the digital age, much like the maritime realm, harbors its own share of mysteries and unexpected connections, waiting to be discovered by those adventurous enough to venture forth.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]

ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis revealed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9741997 between the incidence of pirate attacks globally and the volume of Google searches for "download firefox." The r-squared value of 0.9490651 indicated that approximately 94.9% of the variance in the Google search term can be explained by the frequency of pirate attacks. Furthermore, the significance level of p < 0.01 provided compelling evidence that this correlation is not merely a product of random chance.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the strong positive relationship between the two variables, with the incidence of pirate attacks aligning closely with the volume of searches for "download firefox." The upward trajectory of the data points is indicative of a pronounced association, albeit one laden with intrigue and unexpected relevance.

These findings, while unexpected, serve as a poignant reminder that the seas of internet behavior are rife with unforeseen currents, and that even the most obscure search queries may harbor connections to seemingly unrelated global occurrences. The implications of this correlation prompt contemplation and curiosity, underscoring the multifaceted nature of internet behavior and the unexpected web of connections that underpin it.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Pirate attacks globally and Google searches for 'download firefox'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Ahoy, Matey! Navigating the High Seas of Internet Search Behavior: A Correlational Analysis of Pirate Attacks and Google Searches for 'Download Firefox'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study delves into the unexpected and uncharted waters of the relationship between pirate attacks worldwide and the Google search term "download firefox." Leveraging data from Statista and Google Trends, we embarked on an empirical exploration to shed light on this enigmatic connection. Our findings revealed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9741997, with a significance level of p < 0.01, for the years 2009 to 2022. This paper illuminates the startling yet intriguing relationship between maritime piracy and individuals' proclivity to seek out an alternative web browser. The implications of this discovery provoke contemplation and bemusement, serving as a reminder that in the vast sea of internet behavior, unexpected currents can often lead to unforeseen destinations.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
To contextualize the unexpected correlation between pirate attacks globally and the Google search term "download firefox," it is imperative to survey the existing literature on internet behavior, piracy, and web browsing habits. Smith et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of online search patterns and observed a discernible relationship between internet user demographics and their choice of web browsers. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2018) delved into the intricacies of digital piracy and its impact on consumer behavior, shedding light on the complex interplay between online content consumption and legal frameworks. However, these studies, while illuminating in their own right, have yet to explore the peculiar nexus between maritime piracy and the proclivity to seek an alternative web browser.
In "The Internet and Society" by Johnson (2019) and "Digital Piracy in the Modern Age" by Brown (2020), the authors emphasized the need to unravel the idiosyncrasies of internet behavior and the influence of technological advancements on consumer choices. These works provide a foundational understanding of the intricate tapestry of online activities and the broader societal implications thereof. However, the profound association between pirate attacks worldwide and the specific Google query "download firefox" remained conspicuously absent from their purview.
Turning to fictional works, the timeless classic "Treasure Island" by Stevenson (1883) and the swashbuckling saga "Pirates of the Caribbean" by Disney (2003) stimulate the imagination with their tales of maritime adventures and derring-do. While these literary and cinematic creations captivate audiences with their romanticized depictions of piracy, they offer little insight into the peculiar digital behaviors that underpin our contemporary internet landscape.
In the realm of animated entertainment, the whimsical escapades of "SpongeBob SquarePants" and the daring exploits of "Jake and the Never Land Pirates" beckon viewers into a realm of make-believe piracy. While these lighthearted portrayals of nautical hijinks entertain and amuse, they do little to elucidate the profound connection between real-world pirate activity and the inclination to download an alternative web browser.
In light of the dearth of academic inquiry into this cryptic synergy, our study ventures into uncharted waters to unravel the unforeseen convergence of pirate attacks and the Google search term "download firefox." As we navigate these enigmatic currents, we do so in the spirit of scholarly curiosity and a willingness to entertain unexpected revelations.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis revealed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9741997 between the incidence of pirate attacks globally and the volume of Google searches for "download firefox." The r-squared value of 0.9490651 indicated that approximately 94.9% of the variance in the Google search term can be explained by the frequency of pirate attacks. Furthermore, the significance level of p < 0.01 provided compelling evidence that this correlation is not merely a product of random chance.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the strong positive relationship between the two variables, with the incidence of pirate attacks aligning closely with the volume of searches for "download firefox." The upward trajectory of the data points is indicative of a pronounced association, albeit one laden with intrigue and unexpected relevance.
These findings, while unexpected, serve as a poignant reminder that the seas of internet behavior are rife with unforeseen currents, and that even the most obscure search queries may harbor connections to seemingly unrelated global occurrences. The implications of this correlation prompt contemplation and curiosity, underscoring the multifaceted nature of internet behavior and the unexpected web of connections that underpin it.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]

ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

In the wake of our empirical inquiry into the correlation between pirate attacks worldwide and Google searches for "download firefox," our findings resoundingly affirm the unexpected alliance between maritime piracy and web browsing behavior. This discovery evokes contemplation of the intriguing interplay between seemingly disparate phenomena. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9741997 showcases the undeniable affinity between these variables, while the high r-squared value of 0.9490651 underscores the substantial proportion of variance explained by the frequency of pirate attacks. These results align with previous research on internet user demographics influencing web browser choices (Smith et al., 2015), substantiating the notion that external factors, such as global events, can indeed sway online behavior in unforeseen ways.

The unexpected nexus between piratical activities and the predilection to seek out an alternative web browser calls to mind the timeless adage "seeking treasure where one least expects to find it." Just as intrepid mariners sail the open seas in pursuit of hidden bounty, internet users navigate the digital expanse in quest of their preferred virtual tools. The peculiarity of this connection serves as a testament to the unpredictable undercurrents that shape our online activities, reminding us that the vast sea of internet behavior harbors unexpected depths.

Our study's alignment with prior literature on the influence of technological advancements on consumer choices (Johnson, 2019) and the impact of digital piracy on consumer behavior (Doe & Jones, 2018) underscores the interdisciplinary relevance of our findings. While the whimsical portrayals of piracy in popular culture enkindle the imagination, our research sheds light on the substantive convergence between real-world events and digital inclinations. This unanticipated fusion of high-seas exploits and virtual quests underscores the expansive tapestry of human behavior, affirming that the ripples of global events reverberate throughout the digital domain in ways both enigmatic and enlightening.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Pirate attacks globally and Google searches for 'download firefox'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Ahoy, Matey! Navigating the High Seas of Internet Search Behavior: A Correlational Analysis of Pirate Attacks and Google Searches for 'Download Firefox'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study delves into the unexpected and uncharted waters of the relationship between pirate attacks worldwide and the Google search term "download firefox." Leveraging data from Statista and Google Trends, we embarked on an empirical exploration to shed light on this enigmatic connection. Our findings revealed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9741997, with a significance level of p < 0.01, for the years 2009 to 2022. This paper illuminates the startling yet intriguing relationship between maritime piracy and individuals' proclivity to seek out an alternative web browser. The implications of this discovery provoke contemplation and bemusement, serving as a reminder that in the vast sea of internet behavior, unexpected currents can often lead to unforeseen destinations.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The oceans of internet search behavior are vast and sometimes treacherous, much like the high seas themselves. While the piratical exploits of yore have largely been consigned to the annals of history, the digital age has ushered in its own brand of piracy, albeit of a markedly different nature. The emergence of online piracy, characterized by unauthorized downloading and sharing of copyrighted content, has posed numerous challenges to the maritime, legal, and technological realms. However, in a curious twist of fate, our investigation has illuminated an intriguing correlation between this modern-day piracy and a seemingly unrelated phenomenon: the Google search term "download firefox."
The ubiquitous web browser Firefox, offered by the Mozilla Foundation, has long been the choice of many conscientious internet users and tech enthusiasts. Its commitment to privacy, open-source principles, and innovative features has earned it a dedicated following amid the vast expanse of browser options. However, what prompts individuals to seek out this particular browser, and why might this behavior be linked, however tangentially, to the domain of piracy?
Motivated by these ponderings, the present study seeks to navigate these uncharted waters and unravel the confounding relationship between pirate attacks globally and the esoteric search query "download firefox." Through a meticulous analysis of data culled from Statista, which documents incidents of pirate attacks across the globe, and Google Trends, which tracks the volume of searches for specific terms, we endeavored to tease out the patterns and interconnections that underpin these ostensibly disparate phenomena.
In the pages that follow, we present the findings of our empirical investigation, wherein we have uncovered a strikingly robust correlation between pirate attacks and Google searches for "download firefox," spanning the years 2009 to 2022. The implications of this unexpected linkage are as enigmatic as they are thought-provoking, traversing the realms of digital behavior, consumer preferences, and perhaps even the whims of the intrepid internet navigator.
We invite the reader to embark upon this scholarly voyage with us, as we unravel the intricacies of this intriguing correlation and contemplate the unforeseen currents that traverse the landscape of internet behavior. As we navigate these uncharted waters, it becomes manifest that the digital age, much like the maritime realm, harbors its own share of mysteries and unexpected connections, waiting to be discovered by those adventurous enough to venture forth.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis revealed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9741997 between the incidence of pirate attacks globally and the volume of Google searches for "download firefox." The r-squared value of 0.9490651 indicated that approximately 94.9% of the variance in the Google search term can be explained by the frequency of pirate attacks. Furthermore, the significance level of p < 0.01 provided compelling evidence that this correlation is not merely a product of random chance.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the strong positive relationship between the two variables, with the incidence of pirate attacks aligning closely with the volume of searches for "download firefox." The upward trajectory of the data points is indicative of a pronounced association, albeit one laden with intrigue and unexpected relevance.
These findings, while unexpected, serve as a poignant reminder that the seas of internet behavior are rife with unforeseen currents, and that even the most obscure search queries may harbor connections to seemingly unrelated global occurrences. The implications of this correlation prompt contemplation and curiosity, underscoring the multifaceted nature of internet behavior and the unexpected web of connections that underpin it.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]

ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our expedition into the uncharted waters of internet behavior has yielded a remarkable revelation: a remarkably robust correlation exists between pirate attacks worldwide and the volume of Google searches for "download firefox." The strength of this correlation, with a coefficient of 0.9741997 and a significance level of p < 0.01, defies mere happenstance and underscores the unexpected currents that traverse the digital landscape.

The implications of this discovery are as baffling as they are intriguing. One cannot help but ponder the curious link between maritime piracy and individuals' proclivity to seek out an alternative web browser. Could it be that the allure of the high seas and the swashbuckling tales of old stir a latent desire for adventure and exploration, manifesting in the choice of an alternate browser? Or perhaps, the need for anonymity and privacy in the face of digital piracy drives individuals to seek out a browser renowned for its commitment to these principles. The answers remain shrouded in mystery, much like the depths of the ocean.

As we chart our course through the realm of internet behavior, it becomes evident that the digital age, much like the maritime world, harbors its own share of enigmas and unexpected connections. The unassuming search query "download firefox" has, in this study, emerged as a beacon amidst the waves, guiding us toward unforeseen destinations and beckoning us to contemplate the curious intertwining of disparate phenomena.

While the correlation uncovered in this study may elicit bemusement and curiosity, it stands as a testament to the capricious nature of internet behavior, where even the most unlikely associations can bear unexpected significance. Therefore, it is our earnest contention that no further research is warranted in this peculiar domain, as the findings of this investigation have comprehensively navigated the depths of this confounding correlation, leaving no stone unturned in the exploration of this unforeseen current in internet behavior.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Ahoy, Matey! Navigating the High Seas of Internet Search Behavior: A Correlational Analysis of Pirate Attacks and Google Searches for 'Download Firefox'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Online Buccaneers and Cyber Searches

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Ahoy, Matey! Navigating the High Seas of Internet Search Behavior: A Correlational Analysis of Pirate Attacks and Google Searches for 'Download Firefox'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Nautical Analytics and Cyber Navigation

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Ahoy, Matey! Navigating the High Seas of Internet Search Behavior: A Correlational Analysis of Pirate Attacks and Google Searches for 'Download Firefox' with an abstract of The present study delves into the unexpected and uncharted waters of the relationship between pirate attacks worldwide and the Google search term "download firefox." Leveraging data from Statista and Google Trends, we embarked on an empirical exploration to shed light on this enigmatic connection. Our findings revealed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9741997, with a significance level of p < 0.01, for the years 2009 to 2022. This paper illuminates the startling yet intriguing relationship between maritime piracy and individuals' proclivity to seek out an alternative web browser. The implications of this discovery provoke contemplation and bemusement, serving as a reminder that in the vast sea of internet behavior, unexpected currents can often lead to unforeseen destinations.

ChatGPT:

"internet search behavior," "pirate attacks," "Google searches," "correlational analysis," "download Firefox," "Statista data," "Google Trends," "relationship between pirate attacks and internet searches," "web browser usage," "maritime piracy," "alternative web browser," "unexpected internet behavior," "unexpected correlations," "internet search trends," "unforeseen destinations"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.

Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error

Data details

Pirate attacks globally
Detailed data title: Global Pirate Attack Count
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with Pirate attacks globally

Google searches for 'download firefox'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'download firefox' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: ^{See full details} Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'download firefox'

Correlation r = 0.9741997 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r² = 0.9490651 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 94.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'download firefox') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Pirate attacks globally) over the 14 years from 2009 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.03E-9.^Show 0.0000000040281631357464190000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme.^Note More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 4.03E-7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 248,252,111 random variables^Note You don't actually need 248 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 13 degrees of freedom, ^Note Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 13 because we have two variables measured over a period of 14 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.92, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
^{Read more about the confidence interval} The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!

All values for the years included above: ^Note If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.

	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016	2017	2018	2019	2020	2021	2022
Pirate attacks globally (Number of Attacks)	410	445	439	297	264	245	246	191	180	201	162	195	132	115
Google searches for 'download firefox' (Rel. search volume)	68.8333	77.4167	63.8333	43.1667	31.75	25	19.8333	8.58333	7.83333	5.58333	4.66667	4.83333	4	4.25

Why this works

Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
Lack of causal connection: There is probably^Note Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple^Note Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.

Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. ^{Show the steps to do this.} Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."

# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([410,445,439,297,264,245,246,191,180,201,162,195,132,115,])
array_2 = np.array([68.8333,77.4167,63.8333,43.1667,31.75,25,19.8333,8.58333,7.83333,5.58333,4.66667,4.83333,4,4.25,])
array_1_name = "Pirate attacks globally"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'download firefox'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)

Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. ^Note Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:

High resolution line chart ^Note The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.

If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.

Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape.
High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
Alternative high resolution line chart
Scatterplot
Portable line chart (png)
Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
Line chart for only Pirate attacks globally
Line chart for only Google searches for 'download firefox'
AI-generated correlation image
The spurious research paper: Ahoy, Matey! Navigating the High Seas of Internet Search Behavior: A Correlational Analysis of Pirate Attacks and Google Searches for 'Download Firefox'

View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm grateful for your review!

Correlation ID: 2204 · Black Variable ID: 488 · Red Variable ID: 1397


Problem variable:
Issue:
Additional details: Optional
Confirm you are a human: