Report an error
Master's degrees awarded in Parks & Recreation correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of insurance sales agents in Idaho | r=0.99 | 10yrs | No |
Wind power generated in South Africa | r=0.99 | 10yrs | No |
Electricity generation in Singapore | r=0.98 | 10yrs | No |
Google searches for 'sushi near me' | r=0.98 | 10yrs | Yes! |
US Wind Power Generation Capacity | r=0.98 | 10yrs | No |
Cheddar cheese consumption | r=0.97 | 10yrs | No |
Johnson & Johnson's stock price (JNJ) | r=0.97 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA | r=0.96 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Alphabet's stock price (GOOGL) | r=0.96 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Master's degrees awarded in Parks & Recreation also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)